Assessing the Human Rights Situation in Bahrain: a Shadow Report on Bahrain's Implementation of Its ICCPR Obligations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing the Human Rights Situation in Bahrain: a Shadow Report on Bahrain's Implementation of Its ICCPR Obligations Assessing the Human Rights Situation in Bahrain: A Shadow Report on Bahrain's Implementation of its ICCPR Obligations © 2014, the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD), Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB) and the Bahran Centre for Human Rights. All rights reserved. Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy The Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD) is a non- profit organisation focusing on advocacy, education and awareness for the calls of democracy and human rights in Bahrain. www.birdbh.org Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain is a non- profit, 501(c)(3) organization based in Washington, D.C. Through engagement with U.S. government officials, intergovernmental actors, activists, and the public, we seek to foster awareness of and support for democracy and human rights in Bahrain. 1001 Connecticut Ave. Northwest, Suite 205 Washington, DC 20036 202.621.6141 United States www.adhrb.org Bahrain Center for Human Rights The Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) is a non-profit, non- governmental organization, registered with the Bahraini Ministry of Labor and Social Services since July 2002. Despite an order by the authorities in November 2004 to close it, the BCHR is still functioning after gaining wide internal and external support for its struggle to promote human rights in Bahrain. www.bahrainrights.org 2 Introduction The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1966 and in force since 1976, is one of three instruments comprising the ‘International Bill of Rights,’ the other two being the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Political Rights (ICESPR). Once a State ratifies the ICCPR, it falls upon its government to implement the necessary laws and mechanisms to protect the rights expressed within the ICCPR, such as the right to participate in government, to vote, and the freedoms of expression and assembly. It falls upon the UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) to review each individual State’s adherence to the ICCPR. This is done through the process by which each State submits a periodic report to the Committee, which then commences its review. As of 2014, 168 countries are party to the ICCPR. Bahrain acceded to the ICCPR in 2006, the only Arab Gulf monarchy to do so (however, Kuwait ratified in 1996). In acceding to the Convention, Bahrain agreed to be bound by the provisions of the ICCPR without the need for an act of signature. In accordance to Article 40 of the ICCPR, Bahrain was required to submit a periodic treaty report to the HRC on the measures adopted within one year of ratifying the convention and maintains an affirmative obligation to submit follow-up reports every four years thereafter. Bahrain has yet to submit either the initial report or any follow-up reports to the HRC. Before discussing the present state of Bahrain’s adherence to the ICCPR, it is necessary to briefly examine human rights developments before and after 2006. In the first seven years of King Hamad’s reign (r. 1999-present), the government made attempts towards meaningful political reforms to bring an end to the political uprising of the 1990’s. Included among these reforms was the scrapping of the 1974 State Security Law, which allowed the detention of persons for up to three years renewable without charges being brought against them, a general amnesty for all political exiles,1 and a commitment to democratic government.2 By 2006, however, during Bahrain’s accession to the ICCPR, many of these reforms had proven to be hollow, and political discontent began to foment once again. In 2007, security personnel once again began employing practices of torture after its absence in King Hamad’s first years as ruler. In February 2011, the ‘Arab Spring’ spread to Bahrain, and protesters took to the streets demanding political and economic reforms. The Government responded with increasingly repressive measures against its political opponents in a clear breach of its legal obligations under the ICCPR. Since then, the government has continued to infringe upon most civil and political rights. This report looks at Bahrain’s commitments to the following prohibitions, rights and freedoms guaranteed under the ICCPR: the prohibition of torture (article 7); right to liberty (article 9); rights of prisoners (article 10); right to fair trial (article 14); freedom of religion (article 18); 1 ‘Bahrain: Promising Human rights reform must continue,’ Amnesty International, 13 March 2001, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE11/005/2001/en/d76b504c-f84c-11dd-a0a9- 2bd73ca4d38a/mde110052001en.pdf. Archive of original created 9 February 2011, http://www.webcitation.org/5wNVoYKJs, (accessed 5 August 2014). 2 Constitution of the Kingdom of Bahrain, 2002, art. 1.b, 1.d. The 2002 Constitution states that Bahrain is a constitutional monarchy and affirms the country’s commitment to democracy. 3 freedom of expression (article 19); freedom of assembly (article 21) and the freedom of association (article 22). It finds that in every respect, the situation in Bahrain has deteriorated. Freedom of Expression, Assembly, Association and Religion Freedom of Expression As many as 4,000 people are estimated to currently be in detention or prison in Bahrain for crimes related to thought, expression and assembly.3 The most prominent of them are the Bahrain 13. The Bahrain 13 are political leaders, human rights activists and members of Bahrain’s intelligentsia who have been imprisoned for expressing their views for reform in Bahrain. Six are sentenced to life in prison; two are serving five years sentences; another four are serving fifteen years in prison; and one, Mohammad Habib al-Miqdad, is serving a sixty- eight year sentence.4 The government imprisoned all of them in 2011 for offences related to their freedoms of expression and assembly. Abdulhadi al-Khawaja, one of the Bahrain 13, is a co-founder of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) and has been active in campaigns for reform since 1979. Security forces arrested al-Khawaja in 2011 for his role in leading pro-democracy protests. During his detention he was tortured and in June 2011 a military court sentenced him to life. On 25 August 2014 he began a hunger strike in protest of his false charges and poor prison conditions.5 It is his second since his imprisonment, his first in 2012 ending after 110 when authorities force- fed him to break his strike.6 As of 25 September 2014, his second strike continues despite his rapidly deteriorating health and his refusal to be transferred to a hospital.7 Al-Khawaja, punished for exercising his freedoms of expression and association three years ago, is left with no other way of expressing himself. In 2014, King Hamad decreed a new law criminalising ‘insulting the King.’ Persons found guilty face up to seven years in prison and a fine of up to USD$26,500.8 The police and judiciary use this as a pretext to target critics of the reigning monarch King Hamad and the monarchic system in general. However, the courts have convicted individuals for insulting King Hamad prior to the promulgation of this law. In October 2012, police arrested four unidentified individuals for insulting the King on Twitter,9 and as of 29 April 2014 the 3 ‘Advocacy Associate Engages Interactive Dialogue on Arbitrary Detention at HRC27,’ Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain, 14 September 2014, http://adhrb.org/2014/09/adhrb-advocacy- associate-engages-agenda-item-3-interactive-dialogue-at-hrc27/, (accessed 26 September 2014). 4 ‘Freedom for the Bahrain 13: Mohammad Al-Miqdad,’ BIRD, http://birdbh.org/mohammed-habib-al-miqdad/, (accessed 1 July 2014). 5 ‘Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja,’ BIRD, http://birdbh.org/abdulhadi-al-khawaja/, (accessed 12 September 2014). 6 ‘Bahraini activist Khawaja ends hunger strike,’ BBC, 29 May 2012, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world- 18239695, (accessed 12 September 2014). 7 ‘Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja,’ BIRD, http://birdbh.org/abdulhadi-al-khawaja/, (accessed 12 September 2014). 8 ‘New law: Insult Bahrain’s king, get thrown in jail,’ CNN, 6 February 2014, http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/06/world/meast/barhain-new-law/, (accessed 15 September 2014). 9 ‘Bahrain charges four men with defaming king on Twitter,’ Reuters, 18 October 2012, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/18/net-us-bahrain-defamation-king-idUSBRE89H0HI20121018, (accessed 25 June 2014). 4 Government admits to having arrested twelve for this crime.10 However, evidence shows that defendants were tried based on statements that do not necessarily target the private life of the King. Ali Abdulla Ahmad al-Hayaki was arrested for two statements he made on the social media website Twitter: ‘Down with Hamad – This immortal tune longs to be called out and inspire the heart – May God bring about the fall of this tyrant,’ and ‘The people said the word and the time of dictators has passed, down with Hamad.’11 Based on these two tweets, the court sentenced the defendant to four months in prison.12 Though the statements are certainly attacks on King Hamad as a public figure, it is difficult to see how they may be interpreted as insults towards his private life. Freedom of Assembly Between April and October 2011, military courts convicted at least 200 defendants of ‘participating in illegal demonstrations’.13 In 2012, a court sentenced Nabeel Rajab to a cumulative three years for three separate charges of illegal demonstration. The Information Affairs Authority said these had been violent protests, though Rajab and his lawyer contended that they were peaceful.14 Authorities arrested many prominent activists, including Abdulwahab Hussain of the Wafa’a Movement, Hassan Mushaima of the Haq Movement and Abdulhadi al-Khawaja, all members of the Bahrain 13, for their leading roles in the February- April 2011 protests.15 YouTube videos also attest to the fact that police have cracked down upon peaceful assemblies.
Recommended publications
  • QATAR V. BAHRAIN) REPLY of the STATE of QATAR ______TABLE of CONTENTS PART I - INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I - GENERAL 1 Section 1
    CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION AND TERRITORIAL QUESTIONS BETWEEN QATAR AND BAHRAIN (QATAR V. BAHRAIN) REPLY OF THE STATE OF QATAR _____________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I - GENERAL 1 Section 1. Qatar's Case and Structure of Qatar's Reply Section 2. Deficiencies in Bahrain's Written Pleadings Section 3. Bahrain's Continuing Violations of the Status Quo PART II - THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND CHAPTER II - THE TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF QATAR Section 1. The Overall Geographical Context Section 2. The Emergence of the Al-Thani as a Political Force in Qatar Section 3. Relations between the Al-Thani and Nasir bin Mubarak Section 4. The 1913 and 1914 Conventions Section 5. The 1916 Treaty Section 6. Al-Thani Authority throughout the Peninsula of Qatar was consolidated long before the 1930s Section 7. The Map Evidence CHAPTER III - THE EXTENT OF THE TERRITORY OF BAHRAIN Section 1. Bahrain from 1783 to 1868 Section 2. Bahrain after 1868 PART III - THE HAWAR ISLANDS AND OTHER TERRITORIAL QUESTIONS CHAPTER IV - THE HAWAR ISLANDS Section 1. Introduction: The Territorial Integrity of Qatar and Qatar's Sovereignty over the Hawar Islands Section 2. Proximity and Qatar's Title to the Hawar Islands Section 3. The Extensive Map Evidence supporting Qatar's Sovereignty over the Hawar Islands Section 4. The Lack of Evidence for Bahrain's Claim to have exercised Sovereignty over the Hawar Islands from the 18th Century to the Present Day Section 5. The Bahrain and Qatar Oil Concession Negotiations between 1925 and 1939 and the Events Leading to the Reversal of British Recognition of Hawar as part of Qatar Section 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain Country Report BTI 2012
    BTI 2012 | Bahrain Country Report Status Index 1-10 5.89 # 56 of 128 Political Transformation 1-10 4.35 # 87 of 128 Economic Transformation 1-10 7.43 # 21 of 128 Management Index 1-10 4.18 # 91 of 128 scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2012. The BTI is a global assessment of transition processes in which the state of democracy and market economy as well as the quality of political management in 128 transformation and developing countries are evaluated. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2012 — Bahrain Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2012. © 2012 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh BTI 2012 | Bahrain 2 Key Indicators Population mn. 1.3 HDI 0.806 GDP p.c. $ - Pop. growth1 % p.a. 7.6 HDI rank of 187 42 Gini Index - Life expectancy years 75 UN Education Index 0.747 Poverty3 % - Urban population % 88.6 Gender inequality2 0.288 Aid per capita $ - Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2011. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary Bahrain’s democratic reform process has come to a standstill since 2009, which marked the 10th anniversary of King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa’s accession to power. The positive developments in civil and political liberties observed with the start of the reform process in 2002 have in recent years been counteracted by repressive state tactics in which freedoms of expression and assembly have suffered most.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis Volume 6, Issue 1 Jan/Feb 2014
    Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis Volume 6, Issue 1 Jan/Feb 2014 Annual Threat Assessment SOUTHEAST ASIA Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore SOUTH ASIA Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka EAST AND CENTRAL ASIA China and Central Asia MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Libya and Somalia INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM RESEARCH S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2 ANNUAL THREAT ASSESSMENT Terrorism and Political Violence in 2013 Southeast Asia peace talks were held in January 2014. Iraq, too, remains besieged by sectarian violence and constant attacks. In Yemen, Southeast Asia has seen some of its insurgencies and conflicts multiple insurgencies and a robust threat from Al Qaeda in the diminish while others have continued unabated. In Thailand, the Arabian Peninsula have hampered an already difficult political restive south continued to see violence in 2013 while Bangkok transition. In Egypt, Morsi’s ouster has seen protests continuing witnessed a political crisis with protests against the government to plague the country while the military attempts another turning violent. In Myanmar, reforms have moved forward but political transition. Libya, meanwhile, faces a persistent security communal violence continues to plague the country and has challenge in its southern border region and the success of its evolved from targeting Rohingyas towards Muslim minority transition after Gaddafi will depend on the militias which communities in general. Indonesia continues to face a potent deposed the former dictator giving up their arms. In Somalia, threat from radicalization and concern has emerged over the al-Shabaab has intensified its campaign against the role its “hard” counterterrorist approach is playing in fueling government in the wake of a hardline faction emerging further extremism.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Uprisings: an Update
    Arab uprisings: an update Standard Note: SNIA/6400 Last updated: 2 August 2012 Author: Ben Smith Section International Affairs and Defence Section A brief survey of developments in the Arab world since the uprisings that began in 2011 (background and earlier developments can be found in a collection of briefings – see the last section: further reading). Two of the three countries that have had elections since the uprisings – Tunisia and Egypt – have seen mainstream and more radical Islamists dominating. In Libya, the third of the three, a pragmatic and relatively secular politician who had been former Prime Minister during the rebellion did well. It is still early to know what these new governments will do but, as with many of the countries in the region, pressing economic problems may be the most important thing. Meanwhile, after a dramatic few weeks, many are now convinced that the Assad regime in Syria cannot survive. Contents 1 Egypt 3 1.1 Elections 3 1.2 Formation of a government 4 1.3 Outlook 4 2 Tunisia 5 2.1 Election to the constituent assembly 6 Women 6 2.2 Interim government 7 2.3 Outlook 7 3 Libya 7 3.1 Electoral system 8 Women 8 This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Risk of Blackout on Human Rights Violations
    www.fidh.org Bahrain 1 April 2011 Bahrain: risk of blackout on human rights violations The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) strongly condemns the serious human rights violations that have been committed in Bahrain since February 14, 2011, and expresses its deepest concerns regarding the latest developments in the country. According to the information collected by the Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR), an FIDH member organisation, at least 26 people died and more than 200 individuals (click here to access the lists), including doctors, teachers, unionists and human rights defenders have been detained since the beginning of the repression led by security forces against peaceful protesters who are demanding democracy and respect for human rights in the country. In addition to the continuation of killings, arrests and acts of repression and intimidation against people considered as opponents or linked to the opposition movement, FIDH is worried about measures aiming at silencing those who dare to speak out about the repression. On March 29, 2011 two journalists from CNN were arrested while they were interviewing Nabeel Rajab, President of the BCHR at his home. They remained in detention for 4 hours. This event occured following a decree issued on March 28 by the Military General Prosecutor -Decision No.5 of 2011- imposing a ban on any publications dealing with the ongoing investigation conducted by the military prosecutor, under the State of National Safety. FIDH fears that this decree could be used to strictly limit the freedoms of expression and of the media and contribute to a blackout on human rights violations in Bahrain.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 May 2021, Rome to His Majesty King Hamad Bin Isa Al Khalifa Of
    13 May 2021, Rome To His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa of Bahrain, We, Members of the Italian Parliament, are writing to you today to express our deep concerns over the fate of the prisoners of conscience and the human rights defenders currently held in the prisons of the Kingdom of Bahrain. We are aware that not only are these prisoners subjected to unjust punishment and ill-treatment, but that they are also experiencing a disproportionately high risk of illness, as they are deprived of medical attention and personal protective equipment necessary to protect against COVID-19. This situation is great cause for concern, since it violates the values of freedom, dignity, and respect that Italy and the rest of the international community hold dear. Moreover, it does not respect the many international treaties that the Kingdom of Bahrain has signed which aim to defend human freedom, dignity, and safety. These treaties further safeguard an individual’s right to freedom of expression and freedom of speech, and include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and the Arab Charter on Human Rights (ACHR). As you are certainly aware, on 11th March 2021, the EU Parliament passed a resolution that addresses the cases of the prisoners of conscience and human rights defenders who are currently serving their prison sentences. For example, Hassan Mushaima, the leader of the political opposition, the former Secretary-General of the al-Haq Movement for Liberty and Democracy, and co-Founder and former Vice President of al-Wefaq National Islamic Society, has been imprisoned since 2011 because of his political opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Bahrain Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review
    Kingdom of Bahrain Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review 27th Session of the UPR Working Group Submitted 22 September 2016 Submission by Bahrain Human Rights Observatory (BHRO): Creation of parties and non-governmental organizations Freedom of assembly and peaceful demonstration Excessive suppression of protests Freedom of opinion and expression BHRO : Bahrain Human Rights Observatory Mrs. Jalila Al-Salman Mobile: +97336595325 e-mail: [email protected] Background: This report, addressed to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) session on Bahrain, covers the period from the end of the UPR in May 2012 up to the writing of this report in April 2016. The report is based on the Bahraini Constitution and the laws acted upon domestically. It is also founded on the United Nation’s Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as major conventions and treaties that Bahrain had endorsed in this field. The figures and statistics in this report depend on our observations of the violations committed. Bahrain’s enforcement of the 2012 Human Rights Council’s Recommendations: The United Nation’s Human Rights Council issued, in its second cycle in May 2012, 21 recommendations regarding the freedom of opinion, expression, peaceful assembly and association. Albeit Bahrain had roughly agreed upon all the recommendations mentioned, nothing had actually changed except an enhancement in the level of suppression against protesters. The Humans Rights Council had advised to make space for a political opposition. However, the Bahraini authorities did not comply with these recommendations, and more so pressured political associations to dissolve The Islamic Action Society [also known as Amal Party] in 2012 and chased down al-Wefaq National Islamic Society and the National Democratic Action Society (Waad) until al-Wefaq was dissolved in June 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK's Relations with Saudi Arabia and Bahrain
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee The UK’s relations with Saudi Arabia and Bahrain Fifth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 12 November 2013 Published on 22 November 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated agencies. Current membership Rt Hon Richard Ottaway (Conservative, Croydon South) (Chair) Mr John Baron (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell (Liberal Democrat, North East Fife) Rt Hon Ann Clwyd (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes (Labour/Co-op, Ilford South) Mark Hendrick (Labour/Co-op, Preston) Sandra Osborne (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Andrew Rosindell (Conservative, Romford) Mr Frank Roy (Labour, Motherwell and Wishaw) Rt Hon Sir John Stanley (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Rory Stewart (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the parliament: Rt Hon Bob Ainsworth (Labour, Coventry North East) Emma Reynolds (Labour, Wolverhampton North East) Mr Dave Watts (Labour, St Helens North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including news items) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/facom.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheikh Qassim, the Bahraini Shi'a, and Iran
    k o No. 4 • July 2012 o l Between Reform and Revolution: Sheikh Qassim, t the Bahraini Shi’a, and Iran u O By Ali Alfoneh The political stability of the small island state of Bahrain—home to the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet—matters to the n United States. And Sheikh Qassim, who simultaneously leads the Bahraini Shi’a majority’s just struggle for a more r democratic society and acts as an agent of the Islamic Republic of Iran, matters to the future of Bahrain. A survey e of the history of Shi’a activism in Bahrain, including Sheikh Qassim’s political life, shows two tendencies: reform and t revolution. Regardless of Sheikh Qassim’s dual roles and the Shi’a protest movement’s periodic ties to the regime in Tehran, the United States should do its utmost to reconcile the rulers and the ruled in Bahrain by defending the s civil rights of the Bahraini Shi’a. This action would not only conform to the United States’ principle of promoting a democracy and human rights abroad, but also help stabilize Bahrain and the broader Persian Gulf region and under- mine the ability of the regime in Tehran to continue to exploit the sectarian conflict in Bahrain in a way that broadens E its sphere of influence and foments anti-Americanism. e Every Friday, the elderly Ayatollah Isa Ahmad The Sunni ruling elites of Bahrain, however, l Qassim al-Dirazi al-Bahrani, more commonly see Sheikh Qassim not as a reformer but as d known as Sheikh Qassim, climbs the stairs to the a zealous revolutionary serving the Islamic pulpit at the Imam al-Sadiq mosque in Diraz, d Bahrain, to deliver his sermon.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical Realignments
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Competing Visions of the State Political and Security Trends in the Arab World and the Middle East Highlights from the conference 19-20 January 2012, Ottawa Think recycling This document is printed with environmentally C friendly ink FSC World Watch: Expert Notes series publication No 2010-09-02 This report is based on the views expressed by presenting experts and other participants at a conference organised by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service as part of its academic outreach program.
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission U.S. Congress Hearing
    Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission U.S. Congress Hearing: “Implementation of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry Report” August 01, 2012 Statement by Amnesty International USA Amnesty International USA welcomes this opportunity to address the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission on the important subject of human rights in Bahrain. We believe that the U.S. Congress has a crucial role to play in supporting human rights and accountability for the people of Bahrain. Amnesty International’s vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other internationally recognized human rights standards. For more than 50 years, Amnesty International has been helping to build a world where human rights are respected, protected, and fulfilled. Today in Bahrain, repression of freedom of expression is continuing with impunity. Despite government promises to introduce reforms following its violent crackdown on protesters in 2011, few improvements have been seen on the ground. The Government of Bahrain is refusing to release scores of prisoners who are incarcerated simply because they exercised their rights to freedom of expression and association. Indeed, Bahrain’s government has sentenced and imprisoned a number of nonviolent critics and activists, making them prisoners of conscience. In her testimony to the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, Bahrain’s Ambassador to the United States Houda Ezra Ebrahim Nonoo stated, “All charges against protestors relating to freedom of speech have been dropped.” Unfortunately, the Government of Bahrain continues to use criminal charges to persecute individuals exercising their right to freedom of expression. Bahraini authorities have charged, convicted, and imprisoned peaceful protestors following nonviolent criticisms of the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Repression in Sudan
    Sudan Page 1 of 243 BEHIND THE RED LINE Political Repression in Sudan Human Rights Watch/Africa Human Rights Watch Copyright © May 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 96-75962 ISBN 1-56432-164-9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was researched and written by Human Rights Watch Counsel Jemera Rone. Human Rights Watch Leonard H. Sandler Fellow Brian Owsley also conducted research with Ms. Rone during a mission to Khartoum, Sudan, from May 1-June 13, 1995, at the invitation of the Sudanese government. Interviews in Khartoum with nongovernment people and agencies were conducted in private, as agreed with the government before the mission began. Private individuals and groups requested anonymity because of fear of government reprisals. Interviews in Juba, the largest town in the south, were not private and were controlled by Sudan Security, which terminated the visit prematurely. Other interviews were conducted in the United States, Cairo, London and elsewhere after the end of the mission. Ms. Rone conducted further research in Kenya and southern Sudan from March 5-20, 1995. The report was edited by Deputy Program Director Michael McClintock and Human Rights Watch/Africa Executive Director Peter Takirambudde. Acting Counsel Dinah PoKempner reviewed sections of the manuscript and Associate Kerry McArthur provided production assistance. This report could not have been written without the assistance of many Sudanese whose names cannot be disclosed. CONTENTS
    [Show full text]