Report on the Health of Colorado's Forests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Health of Colorado's Forests 2016 REPORT ON THE HEALTH OF COLORADO’S FORESTS FIRE AND WATER Director’s Message January 2017 intervention to manage forests for their ability to provide safe, clean water reduced wildfire risk has evolved as to Colorado residents in a cost-effective, we seek to coexist within forested consistent manner. In this report, environments. Fire Adapted we take the opportunity to highlight Communities® initiatives, supported collaborative partnerships and projects through such programs as Firewise with Denver Water, Northern Water, Communities/USA® and Community the City of Ouray and professionals Wildfire Protection Plans, are facilitated implementing Colorado’s Water Plan. by the Colorado State Forest Service I invite you to absorb this and other organizations to provide information, and its implications, so fire mitigation assistance to Colorado you can weigh in on the all-important landowners. discussions facing our legislators and Michael B. Lester, State Forester and In this report, we are pleased to share citizens in directing the management of Director. Photo: Society of American a related success story about residents our forests. Foresters of Jackson County who have worked to better protect their community from Fire and water. The words themselves wildfire. A fire they faced in 2016 was evoke contrasting forces of nature – fire, the Beaver Creek Fire – a 38,000-acre Michael B. Lester often viewed as an all-consuming inferno wildfire northwest of Walden, much of State Forester and Director of destruction; water, a quenching and which occurred in areas dominated by Colorado State Forest Service life-sustaining means of rejuvenation. beetle-kill lodgepole pine – that burned But such generalizations are not always from mid-summer until well after snow accurate, especially in Colorado. Fire began to fall. The fire could serve as a is necessary to the ecology of healthy case study to offer insights regarding forests, and can be a useful wildland future forest management actions and Table of Contents firefighting tool for containment and associated impacts on fire behavior in Executive Summary 2 fuels reduction, while life-giving streams areas containing large amounts of dead and rivers may turn into raging torrents timber, to proactively develop strategies Wildfire in Colorado: 4 that cause heavy erosion and loss of to protect property and save lives. A Rising Challenge property and life. Fire has significant impacts on people So important are these two natural and forests; less obvious are the effects it Statewide Insect and 13 elements that we’ve chosen them for the has on the quality and quantity of water Disease Update focus of this year’s forest health report, available for human and agricultural Water Supplies and Forests: An 23 to give you a better understanding of consumption. The demand for water, of Interdependent Relationship their impacts on Colorado’s forested particular concern in rapidly developing lands. Fire and water are integrally linked sections of our state, underscores the References and 31 as necessary components in shaping a need to work across organizational Acknowledgments healthy, natural forest environment; in boundaries to develop effective return, both are heavily influenced by solutions. Interagency efforts highlight forests themselves. the importance of forest management to Front cover photo: 2012 High Park Fire near The role of wildfire in Colorado’s safeguard water supplies from post-fire Horsetooth Reservoir, Larimer County. Photo: forests has a long history. Human erosion so water providers can maintain Ryan DeBerardinis, Shutterstock.com The Role of the Colorado State Forest Service For more than 60 years, the Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) has been living out its mission: To achieve stewardship of Colorado’s diverse forest environments for the benefit of present and future generations. This is made possible not only by actions within the forestlands of Colorado, but also by initiating face-to-face conversations with surrounding community members, landowners and other agencies. Areas in which the CSFS offers leadership and guidance include forest management; wildfire mitigation and community planning; wood utilization CSFS Community Forestry Program Manager Keith Wood teaches an urban and and marketing; outreach and education; community forestry workshop, with Boyd Lebeda, CSFS Fort Collins District and insect and disease detection, forester. Photo: Grace Mirzeler, Council of Western State Foresters surveys and response. The agency offers technical assistance in urban and community forestry, including tree care and management plans, and is Colorado’s primary provider of seedling trees for conservation purposes such as creating living snow fences and windbreaks, reforesting areas after wildfire and enhancing wildlife habitat. The CSFS works through 19 district and field offices statewide, with a headquarters located in Fort Collins. The agency operates within the Warner College of Natural Resources at Colorado State University and fulfills the responsibilities of the Division of Forestry within the Colorado Department of Natural Resources. Assistant District Forester Kathryn Hardgrave, CSFS Salida District, on a site visit to a landowner’s property. Photo: Grace Mirzeler, Council of Western State Foresters Fire and Water 1 Executive Summary Annual reports on the health of Colorado’s forests provide information to the Colorado General Assembly, stakeholders and citizens by summarizing the current health and condition of forests across the state. This year’s report offers a special focus on how forests impact and are conversely affected by wildland fire and water flowing through forested watersheds. Between broader sections on fire and water, the report offers a detailed review of 2016 insect and disease activity in Colorado forests. Colorado’s 24.4 million acres of forestland provide immeasurable social, economic and ecological benefits to its citizens and visitors. Forests offer a sustainable wood products industry, diverse wildlife, fresh water and ample recreation opportunities. But they face numerous threats, and can present risks to citizens and visitors. These Ice forming on the creek near Willis Gulch Trail, Chaffee County. Photo: Joy Jackson risks, ranging from increasingly large, severe wildfires and insect infestations Fire Adapted Communities®, or Wildfire Risk Reduction Grant (WRRG) to long-term droughts, are likely to be those taking personal responsibility Program in 2013 to assist with funding amplified in the future, as climate model and implementing actions to reduce community-level and statewide actions projections predict statewide warming wildfire risk, provide another way to deal throughout Colorado. To date, the between 2.5°F and 6.5°F by 2050. with WUI challenges. Actions residents WRRG Program has awarded nearly In the face of changing climatic take not only reduce their wildfire risk, $12 million in grants to reduce risk of conditions, a long history of fire but also increase forest health through damage to property, infrastructure and suppression already has altered historic sound forest management practices. The water supplies on non-federal lands. fire cycles and led to the dangerous Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) A key source of information for these build-up of fuels in some areas. offers or assists with many programs reports is the annual aerial forest health Population growth into the wildland- and resources for landowners and survey, a cooperative project between the urban interface (WUI) – the area communities working to become fire- CSFS and the Rocky Mountain Region where structures and other human adapted, including Community Wildfire of the USDA Forest Service. Other data developments meet or intermingle Protection Plans (CWPPs), Firewise sources include information derived with wildland fuels – presents further Communities/USA® and the online from CSFS field inspections and contacts challenges. More than 2 million people Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment with forest landowners, and the Colorado live in Colorado’s WUI, and this number Portal. As testament to the importance Forest Inventory and Analysis Program. is expected to increase significantly. of these and similar programs, the In addition, the CSFS cooperates with Compounding this challenge is that Jackson County CWPP played a other agencies including the Colorado wildland fuel conditions are changing significant role in helping wildland Department of Agriculture and USDA in the state’s forests, in part due to the firefighters prepare for and manage Animal and Plant Health Inspection accumulation of bark beetle-killed trees. Colorado’s 38,000-acre Beaver Creek Fire Service in conducting special surveys to Forest management, including thinning in 2016. ensure early detection of exotic insect trees to improve forest resiliency and To help increase funding species that threaten both urban and reduce or alter fuel loads available for opportunities to mitigate wildfire risk native forests. wildfire, is imperative to effectively in the WUI before a fire starts, the Colorado’s most destructive forest address threats to forest health and Colorado General Assembly created the pests in 2016 continued to be several public safety. 2 2016 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests species of bark beetles that attack CSFS Nursery also grows more than partnerships described in this report and kill conifers. Spruce beetle was 500,000 seedling trees and shrubs each include those with Denver Water,
Recommended publications
  • Can You Unlock the Secrets? Douglas County Outdoors How to Play Has a Secret
    CAN YOU UNLOCK THE SECRETS? DOUGLAS COUNTY OUTDOORS HOW TO PLAY HAS A SECRET... 1. Have fun and enjoy your parks, trails and open spaces. but it’s encrypted, and we need YOU 2. Each individual may complete their own booklet (one booklet per person). to crack the code! 3. Visit the first location, which is LOCATION J. Visit eight scenic Douglas County Outdoors Open Space (Find the list of locations and their corresponding letters or Parks locations to find the numbers to solve the code. on pages 4-7.) Your first destination is provided on page eight of this decoder booklet. 4. Know before you go. Look at trail maps online or at the trailheads. Explore each trail or park while keeping your eyes peeled for a wooden post with a plaque on top. That’s where you’ll find 5. DON’T FORGET A CRAYON or PENCIL. a number in the code and the clue to your next location. 6. Find the post with the numbered plaque. Create a Once you collect all eight numbers you’ve cracked the code! rubbing of the plaque in the first box on page 8 by Use them to open two four-digit locks on a chest located at placing your booklet over the plaque and running your our Parks office. crayon or pencil over it. (The number in the center of the rubbing is the first Unlock the Decode Douglas County secrets to win a prize and number of the code that opens the locks on the chest.) be entered into the grand prize drawing.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Lien Sale Notice 2020
    TAX LIEN SALE NOTICE DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, PAYABLE IN 2020 Office of the County Treasurer County of Pueblo State of Colorado INTERNET PUBLIC AUCTION: 2 Day Sale October 19 & 20, 2020 8:00 A.M. county.pueblo.org/treasurer zeusauction.com Tax payment must be received in the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office on or before Thursday, October 15, 2020 by 4:30 p.m., in cash or certified funds to avoid the delinquent property tax lien from being sold. If the property tax is sold at the tax lien sale, YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY INTEREST AT THE RATE OF NINE PERCENT (9%) PER ANNUM. Redemption payments will be accepted beginning November 6, 2020. Redemption of these taxes must be paid in cash or certified funds within three (3) years or a Treasurer's Deed may be issued to the holder of the tax lien certificate of purchase. All delinquent taxes must be paid to the Pueblo County Treasurer. Please contact the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office for any information regarding delinquent taxes at (719)583-6689, (719)583-6015, or (719)583-6683. DELINQUENT TAXPAYER NAMES WILL APPEAR IN ALL ISSUES OF DELINQUENT TAX LIST. *PUBLISHED IN THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN, SEPTEMBER 19, 26 & OCTOBER 3, 2020 *PUBLISHED WEEKLY FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE WEEKS. NO DELETIONS TO THIS ADVERTISING LIST CAN BE MADE. Page 2 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE Page 3 Page 4 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE 3812 AUGUSTA
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath Falls 2014 and 2015 Exceptional Event EPA Concurrence Request
    Klamath Falls 2014 and 2015 Exceptional Event EPA Concurrence Request Submitted to: EPA, Region 10 By: Rachel Sakata and Anthony Barnack May 2017 Air Quality Planning 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite #600 Portland, OR 97232 Phone: (503) 229-5659 (800) 452-4011 Fax: (503) 229-6762 Contact: Rachel Sakata www.oregon.gov/DEQ DEQ is a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon’s air, land and water. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite #600 Portland, OR 97232 1-800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/deq Contact: Rachel Sakata 503-229-5659 Alternative formats (Braille, large type) of this document can be made available. Contact DEQ, Portland, at 503-229-5696, or toll-free in Oregon at 1-800-452-4011, ext. 5696. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ii Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Conceptual Model ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Source Area ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Affected Region
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Record
    BULL MOOSE SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE/COLORADO BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS/COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED/COLORADO WILDLIFE FEDERATION/NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION/THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP/TROUT UNLIMITED/WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE Sportsmen's Recommendations for Supporting the Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule Problem 1: At 562,000 acres, the upper tier category in the preferred alternative is too small and fails to include much of the most important fish and wildlife habitat. Solution: After further upper tier areas are included by the agency for the Pike-San Isabel and Rio Grande national forests, the acreage of upper tier lands in the preferred alternative should increase to a total of at least 1.4 million acres (33% of Colorado's road less acres) using the prioritized list of road less areas below. Upper tier lands bordering Community Protection Zones may be cut back in acreage so the bordering areas are not included in the upper tier (the overlap is roughly 22,000 acres total). All Alternative 2 lands already placed in upper tier should remain there. Rationale: The upper tier category has been created to balance narrowly defined exceptions in the CO rule such as coal mining, ski area development, and community protection zone logging. This is very similar to the "Primitive" and "Wild Land Recreation" categories used to balance development allowances in the Idaho roadless rule. While important, the preferred alternative (alt. 2) acres are limited to areas where forest plans already prohibit road building. Using these acres as upper tier does not address key fish and wildlife habitat nor does it illustrate a commitment by the Forest Service to go beyond their current plans and create a truly protective rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Correlation of Growth
    ANALYSIS AND CORRELATION OF GROWTH STRATA OF THE CRETACEOUS TO PALEOCENE LOWER DAWSON FORMATION: INSIGHT INTO THE TECTONO-STRATIGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE by Korey Tae Harvey A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: ________________________ Korey Harvey Signed: ________________________ Dr. Jennifer Aschoff Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ___________________________ Signed: _________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Despite numerous studies of Laramide-style (i.e., basement-cored) structures, their 4-dimensional structural evolution and relationship to adjacent sedimentary basins are not well understood. Analysis and correlation of growth strata along the eastern Colorado Front Range (CFR) help decipher the along-strike linkage of thrust structures and their affect on sediment dispersal. Growth strata, and the syntectonic unconformities within them, record the relative roles of uplift and deposition through time; when mapped along-strike, they provide insight into the location and geometry of structures through time. This paper presents an integrated structural- stratigraphic analysis and correlation of three growth-strata assemblages within the fluvial and fluvial megafan deposits of the lowermost Cretaceous to Paleocene Dawson Formation on the eastern CFR between Colorado Springs, CO and Sedalia, CO. Structural attitudes from 12 stratigraphic profiles at the three locales record dip discordances that highlight syntectonic unconformities within the growth strata packages. Eight traditional-type syntectonic unconformities were correlated along-strike of the eastern CFR distinguish six phases of uplift in the central portion of the CFR.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild
    WILD FIRE INVASIVE AIR QUALITY EDUCATION OPP FOR REC SITE OUTFITTER ADEQUATE PLAN INFORMATION IM UPWARD IM NEEDS BASELINE FOREST WILD MANAGED TOTAL PLANS PLANTS VALUES PLANS SOLITUDE INVENTORY GUIDE NO OG STANDARDS MANAGEMENT REP DATA ASSESSMNT WORKFORCE IM VOLUNTEERS REGION NUMBER FOREST NAME WILDERNESS NAME ID TO STD? SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE FLAG SCORE SCORE COMPL FLAG COMPL FLAG SCORE USED EFF FLAG 02 02 BIGHORN NATIONAL CLOUD PEAK 080 Y 76 8 10 10 6 4 8 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 03 BLACK HILLS NATIONAL BLACK ELK WILDERNESS 172 Y 84 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP FOSSIL RIDGE 416 N 59 6 5 2 6 8 8 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LA GARITA WILDERNESS 032 Y 61 6 3 10 4 6 8 8 N 6 6 Y N 4 Y GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LIZARD HEAD 040 N 47 6 3 2 4 6 4 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP MOUNT SNEFFELS 167 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP POWDERHORN 413 Y 62 6 6 2 6 8 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP RAGGEDS WILDERNESS 170 Y 62 0 6 10 6 6 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP UNCOMPAHGRE 037 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP WEST ELK WILDERNESS 039 N 56 0 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT ENCAMPMENT RIVER 327 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado
    Bibliography and Index of Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado By FELICIE CHRONIC and JOHN CHRONIC GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1306 Bibliographic citations for more than 1,800 indexed reports, theses, and open-file releases concerning one of the Nation's most rapidly growing areas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1974 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600045 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402- Price $1.15 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02545 PREFACE This bibliography is intended for persons wishing geological information about the Front Range Urban Corridor. It was compiled at the University of Colorado, funded by the U.S. Geological Survey, and is based primarily on references in the Petroleum Research Microfilm Library of the Rocky Mountain Region. Extensive use was made also of U.S. Geological Survey and American Geological Institute bibliographies, as well as those of the Colorado Geological Survey. Most of the material listed was published or completed before July 1, 1972; references to some later articles, as well as to a few which were not found in the first search, are appended at the end of the alphabetical listing. This bibliography may include more references than some users feel are warranted, but the authors felt that the greatest value to the user would result from a comprehensive rather than a selective listing. Hence, we decided to include the most significant synthesizing articles and books in order to give a broad picture of the geology of the Front Range Urban Corridor, and to include also some articles which deal with geology of areas adjacent to, and probably pertinent to, the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Fully Sited and Designed to Minimize Visual Impacts, Particularly of Distant Front Range Mountain Views and Open Meadows
    20352202035200303500333555 Department of Community Development Douglas County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan Douglas County Department of Community Development Planning Services Division Douglas County, Colorado Adopted by the Douglas County Planning Commission June 16, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On behalf of the Douglas County Planning Commission, staff would like to thank all those who participated in this incredible effort to aid in Douglas County’s development well into the future. Special thanks to all of the citizens who have Douglas County Community Development Staff participated in the 2035 Comprehensive Master Terence T. Quinn, AICP, Director of Community Plan Update. Without your input, the Plan Development would not be possible. Randy Burkhardt, Assistant Director of Parks, Planning Commission 2014 Trails & Building Grounds Pam Schenck Kelly, Chair Edward Brewer Jennifer Eby, Manager of Community and Jim Dullea Resource Services Clarence Hughes Scott Kirkwood Steve Koster, AICP, Assistant Director of David Simonson Planning Services Stevan Strain Bill Vincent Update Team Krystal Woodbury Joe Fowler Dustin Smith, Alternate Kati Rider, AICP Michael O’Muireadhaigh, Alternate Curt Weitkunat, AICP Lloyd Whittal, Jr., Alternate Editing and Graphics Former Planning Commissioners Kim Smith Gary Dani Gary Weaver Contributing Staff Dan Avery, AICP Board of County Commissioners Jeanette Bare, AICP Roger A. Partridge, Chair Chris Boyd Jack A. Hilbert Donna Coffin Jill E. Repella Dan Dertz Tina Dill Doug DeBord, County Manager Nancy Gedeon Judy
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]