Proposed Action Pike National Forest & San Isabel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proposed Action Pike National Forest & San Isabel (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! Indian (! Hills Tiny Town Square Top (! Montezuma Mountain (! 24 (! Fenders ¤£ (! Frisco Mt. Gilman Evans (! Mt. Evans Conifer Parker (! Redcliff Burning (! (! Bear Breckenridge 285 (! ¤£ Jefferson Mt. Evans Louviers (! 25 Grant ¨¦§ (! Singleton 91 (! Sedalia (! (! Kokomo (! (!9 Lost Creek East Pine Bailey (! Boreas (! South Platte (! 67 Franktown (! (! (! (! Climax (! ! Jefferson Lost Creek Buffalo Creek ( Lost Creek West (! SKI East Castle Rock Elizabeth COOPER (! Holy (! Cross Silverheels Como Gunbarrel (! Lost Creek West Lost Alma Green (! Creek East Mountain Mt Massive Leadville Mt Massive (! Rampart West (! Fairplay Lost Larkspur (! Creek Elbert (! East 24 Thunder ¤£ Lost Creek Rampart East South Butte Farnum Sheep Weston Rock Mt. Buffalo Peaks Westcreek (! Elbert Peaks Tarryall West (! (! Palmer Lake Mt. Elbert Garo ¤£285 (! Twin Lakes Lost Creek (! Buffalo 82 South (! Peaks Elk Mountains - Buffalo Collegiate West Granite East 67 Elk Mountain - (! Peaks (! Collegiate North West (! (! Hartsel Lake George Elk Mountain - ¤£24 Puma (! (! Woodland Park Collegiate North Elk Mountain - Crystola Buffalo Peaks (! Collegiate North (! (! Divide South Florissant 24 ¤£ (! Falcon Pikeview (! Cascade Pikes (! Papeton Pikes Peak (! Elk Mountain - Peak East Collegiate South Buena Vista West (! Thirtynine Mile Mountain (!Colorado Springs Kreutzer-Princeton (! Broadmoor Guffey (! Security (!Nathrop (! Kreutzer-Princeton Cripple Creek (! Victor Aspen Ridge (! Fountain Romley Mount Antero (!9 Pitkin (! Ohio (! Badger Creek Garfield (! ¨¦§25 Maysville (! Wigwam Salida (! (! MONARCH Poncha Springs (! ¤£50 (! Parkdale Chipeta Methodist Mountain Howard Stone City Sangre de Cristo: (! (! Silverheels Gulch to Hunts Creek Canon City (! Penrose (! 50 (!Sargents (! ¤£ Texas Creek Portland (! ! Porphyry Florence ( Starvation Peak Coaldale (! Creek (! Cotopaxi Sangre de Cristo: ¤£50 ¤£285 West Creek to Tanner Peak (!67 Big Cottonwood Bonanza City (! Hillside (! Villa Grove 96 (! (! (! Pueblo Wetmore (! Highline Greenwood (! Sangre de Cristo: Lake Creek to Hermit Creek (!96 Hardscrabble Westcliffe (! (!Silver Cliff Rosita (! (! Saguache Scraggy • Beulah Peaks (! **Map Key** (! Cities/Towns Roads St. Charles Crestone 69 Peak State Boundary (! Sangre de Cristo: (! Alvarado Campground to National Forest System Lands Music Pass (Administrative Boundaries) Greenhorn Mountain: Little Saint Charles Creek to Cedarwood Pike National Forest & San Isabel Greenhorn Creek (! Rye National Forest - Colorado Roadless Road building categories are defined by the letters A through D: (! Areas (CRAs) Greenhorn Mountain: A – Roads prohibited (except reserved and outstanding rights) Cisneros Creek to Greenhorn (! National Forest System Other B – Roads generally restricted by desired conditions or guidelines Upper Turkey Creek Congressionally Designated Lands C – Roads generally not restricted except under some specific circumstances Greenhorn Mountain: Ski Area Boundaries (limited by specific language or road density requirements) Sangre de Cristo: Graneros Creek to Section10 La Garita Medano Pass to (! D – Roads not restricted Carbonate Mountain Greenhorn Mountain: Management Categories: Tree-cutting categories are defined by numbers 1 through 4: Badito Cone to Dry Creek A1 - No Road Construction; No Tree 1 – Tree-cutting prohibited (except incidental) Cutting 2 – Tree-cutting generally restricted by desired conditions or guidelines Gardner B1 - Road Construction Inappropriate Or 3 – Tree-cutting generally not restricted except for regulated commercial (! Discouraged; No Tree Cutting timber purposes C3 - Some Road Construction May Occur; 4 – Tree-cutting not restricted Hooper (! Tree Cutting Primarily For Non-Timber Sangre de Cristo: Medano Pass to Purposes The USDA Forest Service manages this data for planning purposes only, and provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any other use of this Carbonate Mountain Colorado Rule Direction For Road Building data. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data & Tree Cutting Replaces Forest Plan are suitable for any other purposes, and to apply this data in an appropriate and (! (! Direction Del Norte conscientious manner. Map Created: May 2008. Mosca C4 - Some Road Construction May Occur; (! Tree Cutting Within Regulated Suitable Sangre de Cristo: Commercial Timber Base Blanca Peak to Walsenburg (! D3 - No Restrictions On Road Construction; Slide Mountain Tree Cutting Primarily For Non-Timber Monte Vista (! ¨¦§25 Purposes ¤£160 D4 - No Restrictions On Road Construction; Tree Cutting Within Regulated Suitable Commercial Timber Base La Veta (! Alamosa (! (!12 (! (! Cuchara Pike National Forest & Fort Garland North Spanish Peaks Spanish Peaks Aguilar (! (! Estrella Cuchara (! San Isabel National Forest Cuchara South Spanish Peaks Ludlow (! Gulnare Alternative 2 - Proposed Action (! Purgatoire (! La Jara Sanford (! D:\projects\roadless\psi_mgtcats_alt2.mxd Boncarbo (! San Luis (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (!.
Recommended publications
  • Tax Lien Sale Notice 2020
    TAX LIEN SALE NOTICE DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, PAYABLE IN 2020 Office of the County Treasurer County of Pueblo State of Colorado INTERNET PUBLIC AUCTION: 2 Day Sale October 19 & 20, 2020 8:00 A.M. county.pueblo.org/treasurer zeusauction.com Tax payment must be received in the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office on or before Thursday, October 15, 2020 by 4:30 p.m., in cash or certified funds to avoid the delinquent property tax lien from being sold. If the property tax is sold at the tax lien sale, YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY INTEREST AT THE RATE OF NINE PERCENT (9%) PER ANNUM. Redemption payments will be accepted beginning November 6, 2020. Redemption of these taxes must be paid in cash or certified funds within three (3) years or a Treasurer's Deed may be issued to the holder of the tax lien certificate of purchase. All delinquent taxes must be paid to the Pueblo County Treasurer. Please contact the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office for any information regarding delinquent taxes at (719)583-6689, (719)583-6015, or (719)583-6683. DELINQUENT TAXPAYER NAMES WILL APPEAR IN ALL ISSUES OF DELINQUENT TAX LIST. *PUBLISHED IN THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN, SEPTEMBER 19, 26 & OCTOBER 3, 2020 *PUBLISHED WEEKLY FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE WEEKS. NO DELETIONS TO THIS ADVERTISING LIST CAN BE MADE. Page 2 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE Page 3 Page 4 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE 3812 AUGUSTA
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Record
    BULL MOOSE SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE/COLORADO BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS/COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED/COLORADO WILDLIFE FEDERATION/NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION/THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP/TROUT UNLIMITED/WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE Sportsmen's Recommendations for Supporting the Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule Problem 1: At 562,000 acres, the upper tier category in the preferred alternative is too small and fails to include much of the most important fish and wildlife habitat. Solution: After further upper tier areas are included by the agency for the Pike-San Isabel and Rio Grande national forests, the acreage of upper tier lands in the preferred alternative should increase to a total of at least 1.4 million acres (33% of Colorado's road less acres) using the prioritized list of road less areas below. Upper tier lands bordering Community Protection Zones may be cut back in acreage so the bordering areas are not included in the upper tier (the overlap is roughly 22,000 acres total). All Alternative 2 lands already placed in upper tier should remain there. Rationale: The upper tier category has been created to balance narrowly defined exceptions in the CO rule such as coal mining, ski area development, and community protection zone logging. This is very similar to the "Primitive" and "Wild Land Recreation" categories used to balance development allowances in the Idaho roadless rule. While important, the preferred alternative (alt. 2) acres are limited to areas where forest plans already prohibit road building. Using these acres as upper tier does not address key fish and wildlife habitat nor does it illustrate a commitment by the Forest Service to go beyond their current plans and create a truly protective rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild
    WILD FIRE INVASIVE AIR QUALITY EDUCATION OPP FOR REC SITE OUTFITTER ADEQUATE PLAN INFORMATION IM UPWARD IM NEEDS BASELINE FOREST WILD MANAGED TOTAL PLANS PLANTS VALUES PLANS SOLITUDE INVENTORY GUIDE NO OG STANDARDS MANAGEMENT REP DATA ASSESSMNT WORKFORCE IM VOLUNTEERS REGION NUMBER FOREST NAME WILDERNESS NAME ID TO STD? SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE FLAG SCORE SCORE COMPL FLAG COMPL FLAG SCORE USED EFF FLAG 02 02 BIGHORN NATIONAL CLOUD PEAK 080 Y 76 8 10 10 6 4 8 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 03 BLACK HILLS NATIONAL BLACK ELK WILDERNESS 172 Y 84 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP FOSSIL RIDGE 416 N 59 6 5 2 6 8 8 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LA GARITA WILDERNESS 032 Y 61 6 3 10 4 6 8 8 N 6 6 Y N 4 Y GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LIZARD HEAD 040 N 47 6 3 2 4 6 4 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP MOUNT SNEFFELS 167 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP POWDERHORN 413 Y 62 6 6 2 6 8 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP RAGGEDS WILDERNESS 170 Y 62 0 6 10 6 6 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP UNCOMPAHGRE 037 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP WEST ELK WILDERNESS 039 N 56 0 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT ENCAMPMENT RIVER 327 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Isabel NF Sangre De Cristo Wilderness
    Arapaho Eagles Nest Square Top Wilderness Mountain NF MountMount Evans Evans Wilderness Mount Evans Burning Bear White River NF Jefferson Mount Holy Evans Cross Lost Creek East Wilderness Boreas Hoosier Ridge Lost Creek East Holy Chicago Ridge Cross Holy Cross Silverheels Gunbarrel Lost Creek West Lost Creek Green Wilderness Mountain Mount Massive Lost Creek East Rampart Hunter- West Mount Massive Pike NF Fryingpan Thunder Wilderness Butte Rampart Wilderness East Lost Sheep Farnum Creek Rock South Weston Peak Schoolmarm Mt. Elbert Buffalo Mountain Peaks West Buffalo Elk Mountain- Peaks Collegiate West East Elk Mountain- Collegiate North Buffalo Peaks Elk Mountain- Collegiate North Wilderness Puma Hills Buffalo Peaks South Collegiate Peaks Wilderness Pikes Peak West Pikes Peak East Elk Mountain- Collegiate South Thirtynine Mile Mountain Kaufman Ridge Kreutzer-Princeton San Aspen Ridge Isabel Little Fountain Creek Romley Fossil Ridge Recreation NF Management Area Mount Antero Badger Gunnison NF Creek Chipeta Methodist Mountain Sangre de Cristo: Silverheels Gulch to Hunts Creek Starvation Creek Sangre de Cristo: West Creek to Big Cottonwood Tanner Peak Highline Sangre de Cristo: Lake Creek to Hermit Creek Babcock Sangre Hardscrabble Hole De Cristo Wilderness Scraggy Peaks Sangre de Cristo: Antelope Alvarado Campground Creek to Music Pass St. Charles Peak ** Map Key ** Sangre de Cristo: Alvarado Campground to Music Pass Greenhorn Mountain: Reveille Canyon Little Saint Charles Creek Proposed Colorado Roadless Areas (CRAs) to Greenhorn Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Revised Statutes 2020 TITLE 30
    Colorado Revised Statutes 2020 TITLE 30 GOVERNMENT - COUNTY COMPENSATION - FEES ARTICLE 1 Fees - General Cross references: For fees of county officers, see § 15 of art. XIV, Colo. Const. 30-1-101. Classification of counties - fixing fees. (1) For the purpose of fixing fees, chargeable and to be collected by county and other officers, and for no other purpose, the several counties of this state are divided into five classes, which classes shall be known as the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth, as follows: (a) The city and county of Denver is a county of the first class; (b) The counties of Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Douglas, El Paso, Jefferson, Pueblo, and Weld are counties of the second class; (c) The counties of Delta, Garfield, Larimer, Las Animas, Logan, Mesa, Montezuma, Montrose, Morgan, and Otero are counties of the third class; (d) The counties of Alamosa, Archuleta, Bent, city and county of Broomfield, Chaffee, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Eagle, Elbert, Fremont, Gilpin, Gunnison, Huerfano, Kit Carson, Lake, La Plata, Lincoln, Ouray, Park, Phillips, Prowers, Rio Grande, Routt, Saguache, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Teller, Washington, and Yuma are counties of the fourth class; (e) The counties of Baca, Custer, Dolores, Grand, Hinsdale, Jackson, Kiowa, Mineral, Moffat, Pitkin, Rio Blanco, San Juan, and Summit are counties of the fifth class. Source: L. 1891: p. 200, § 1. R.S. 08: § 2521. L. 13: p. 276, § 1. C.L. § 7869. L. 25: p. 243, § 1. CSA: C. 66, § 3. CRS 53: § 56-4-1. C.R.S. 1963: § 56-4-1. L. 69: p.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised)
    Butterflies of North America 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America. 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised) *Annotated Checklist of Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California *Field Collecting and Sight Records for Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California *Butterflies of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Tulare and Fresno Counties, California by Ken Davenport¹ 8417 Rosewood Ave. Bakersfield, California 93306 1Museum Associate, C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 January 25, 2014 1 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: San Emigdio Blue (Plebejus emigdionis) near Onyx, Kern County, California, May 23, 2002. This is a very uncommon lycaenid butterfly endemic to a small area of southern California (see text). The type locality is in Kern County. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 2 Annotated Checklist of Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California INTRODUCTION The information presented here incorporates data from collecting, scientific papers, published articles on butterflies, field guides and books, letters from lepidopterists and butterfly watchers. My purpose is to give an updated and annotated checklist of the butterflies occurring in Kern and Tulare Counties, California. This revised publication now includes specific records for all the species and subspecies known to occur in the region.
    [Show full text]