DOCSLIB.ORG

Badito Cone Contiguous Units

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Badito Cone Contiguous Units Lands with Wilderness Characteristics: Badito Cone Contiguous Units Badito Cone over Badito Cone South unit, Royal Gorge Field Office Photo: John Sztukowski The intent of this report is to present objective data to illustrate that the area in question qualifies as Lands with Wilderness Characteristics (LWC), in accordance with Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Manuals 6310 and 6320. The information presented in this report meets the minimum standards for review of new information per Manual 6310, and accordingly BLM must review this information and make its findings and documentation of the review process available to the public as soon as practicable. Lands with Wilderness Characteristics: Badito Cone Contiguous Units BLM Royal Gorge Field Office, Front Range District BLM Unit Identifiers: COF-020-001 (Badito Cone), COF-020-002 (North Hondo), COF-020-003 (Chitwood Gulch), COF-020-087 (Badito Cone North) Submitted by: Wild Connections 2168 Pheasant Place, Colorado Springs, CO 80909 [email protected]; (719) 686 - 5905 Prepared by: John Sztukowski, Wildlands Inventory Coordinator, Wild Connections [email protected]; (817) 939 - 4239 Report Date: March 2015 Table of Contents Map of Badito Cones Contiguous Units LWC ....................................................................................... 3 Overview ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Discussion of Wilderness Characteristics including Boundary Delineations......................... 6 I. The Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC meets the minimum size criteria for roadless lands. ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6 II. The Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC is primarily affected by the forces of nature. ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 III. The Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC provides outstanding opportunities for solitude and primitive recreation. .................................................................................................................... 13 IV. The Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC has supplemental values that would enhance the wilderness experience and should be recognized and protected. .................................. 14 Summary Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 16 Badito Cone Contiguous Units Proposed LWC Waypoints .......................................................... 18 2 Map of Badito Cones Contiguous Units LWC 3 Overview The Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed Lands with Wilderness Characteristics (LWC) is comprised of BLM lands contiguous with the Greenhorn Mountain Wilderness and/or United States Forest Service (USFS) Roadless Recommended Wilderness around the geological feature, Badito Cone. The proposed LWC is made up of four units that comprise approximately 7,600 acres, wrapping around the Wet Mountains predominantly to the south, but to the southeast and southwest as well. The nearest town is Walsenburg, CO, located about 20 miles to the southeast. All units are located in Huerfano County. The Badito Cone area supports a diversity of vegetation, primarily consisting of pinyon-juniper woodlands in the rugged rocky uplands with ponderosa pine mixing in at higher elevations. Cottonwoods and willows can be observed in the gulches that drain the unit. The terrain is predominantly steep and rocky, made up of canyons, cliffs, and rock outcroppings. The proposed LWC ranges from elevations of approximately 6,400 feet at its southernmost point to about 8,400 feet near the units’ boundaries approaching the USFS Recommended Wilderness to the east. Prairie grasslands can be found in the lower foothills to the south and east. The Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC is largely bordered by private property. Road 438 represents the only major access point to any of the units, splitting the two largest units to the southwest, bordering both as the road makes its way to Badito Cone and Forest Service land. County Road 616 borders the southern portion of the largest of these units for a short distance. The remainder of these and all units can otherwise only be accessed by foot via contiguous USFS land. The four Badito Cone Contiguous Units will be referenced geographically, beginning in the northwest, moving counterclockwise around the Wet Mountains. The northwestern unit, Arroyo Hondo, is approximately 530 acres, and does not offer public access. The BLM inventoried this unit as COF-020- 002 (North Hondo) and found the unit to have wilderness characteristics. Below this unit is Badito Cone West, approximately 950 acres, and has a southern boundary of USFS Road 438. The BLM inventoried this unit as COF-020-087 (Badito Cone North) and also found it to have wilderness characteristics. The Badito Cone South unit is by far the largest of these areas, comprising over 5,800 acres. Its northern boundary primarily consists of USFS recommended wilderness, with USFS Road 438 the northern boundary to the northwest. The BLM inventoried this unit as COF-020-001 (Badito Cone) and found wilderness characteristics on 4,866.2 acres, but not on 923.5 acres, identified as COF-020- 001-A (delineated by the yellow line in the above map), the northwestern portion of this area adjacent to USFS Road 438. The BLM did not find wilderness characteristics in this area due to grazing features and access, evidence of old mining, and evidence of timber harvesting. While this subunit does have man-made features, they are largely unnoticeable and do not affect the natural integrity or the apparent naturalness of the unit overall (BLM Manual 6310, p 6-7), particularly when taking into account for the larger 5,800 acre BLM contiguous area, not to mention the greater wilderness corridor this can create with the USFS Greenhorn Mountain Wilderness and Roadless Recommended Wilderness to the north. Furthermore some of the features found within this unit can be considered historical. 4 The final unit making up the Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC is Apache Creek, the northeastern most of these units, and comprises about 330 acres. The BLM inventoried this unit as COF-020-003 (Chitwood Gulch) and found it to have wilderness characteristics. The roads leading to this unit are inaccessible to the public. This unit mostly aligns with a Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Potential Conservation Area (PCA), identified for moderate biodiversity significance. The Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC has high habitat and range values for many wildlife species, including Canadian lynx, swift fox, Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep, black bear, elk, mule deer, white-tailed deer, pronghorn, mountain lion, black-tailed prairie-dog and Gunnison’s prairie-dog. Critical and valued bird species identified in this area include the Mexican spotted owl and scaled quail, both identified as priority birds by Partnership in Flight. The threatened fish species, the greenback cutthroat trout can be found in the Apache Creek unit. Opportunities for solitude and primitive recreation are abundant in the proposed Badito Cone Contiguous Units LWC. The steep rocky terrain, mid-elevation forests, vegetated gulches, and grassland prairies provide extensive opportunity for solitude in the forms of isolation, remoteness, lack of visitation and vegetative and topographic screening. Primitive recreation is also available in all seasons, including hunting, fishing, backpacking, hiking, wildlife viewing, bird watching, and photography. BLM's Manual 6310 states that the boundary delineation for a LWC unit "is generally based on the presence of Wilderness Inventory Roads" but can also be based on property lines between different types of land ownership or on developed rights of way (Manual 6310, p 4). These were the parameters Wild Connections used to define the boundaries of the Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC. Only after the true boundaries of the contiguous roadless unit are identified can an objective and thorough assessment of that unit's wilderness characteristics be made. In the spring of 2013, Wild Connections produced a preliminary boundary delineation for this unit based on the size and contiguity requirements stated in Manual 6310 (p 6). In 2014, Wild Connections' mapping teams visited the Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC to conduct in- depth, on-the-ground inventories of these units. Our goal was to assess this area for wilderness characteristics, based on BLM's Manual 6310, and report our findings to the BLM's Royal Gorge Field Office in efforts to identify potential wilderness areas to expand "wildlands" corridors in central Colorado. Additionally we have reviewed the 2013 BLM RGFO inventory and boundaries and have made assessments and adjustments based on our in-depth field inventories. Wild Connections’ report offers new in-depth data and information, including photo, narrative, and geo-referenced data, supporting the Badito Cone Contiguous Units proposed LWC. The boundary delineations and narratives describing the wilderness characteristics found within this unit are detailed below. Waypoints (many with photos)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tax Lien Sale Notice 2020
    TAX LIEN SALE NOTICE DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, PAYABLE IN 2020 Office of the County Treasurer County of Pueblo State of Colorado INTERNET PUBLIC AUCTION: 2 Day Sale October 19 & 20, 2020 8:00 A.M. county.pueblo.org/treasurer zeusauction.com Tax payment must be received in the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office on or before Thursday, October 15, 2020 by 4:30 p.m., in cash or certified funds to avoid the delinquent property tax lien from being sold. If the property tax is sold at the tax lien sale, YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY INTEREST AT THE RATE OF NINE PERCENT (9%) PER ANNUM. Redemption payments will be accepted beginning November 6, 2020. Redemption of these taxes must be paid in cash or certified funds within three (3) years or a Treasurer's Deed may be issued to the holder of the tax lien certificate of purchase. All delinquent taxes must be paid to the Pueblo County Treasurer. Please contact the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office for any information regarding delinquent taxes at (719)583-6689, (719)583-6015, or (719)583-6683. DELINQUENT TAXPAYER NAMES WILL APPEAR IN ALL ISSUES OF DELINQUENT TAX LIST. *PUBLISHED IN THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN, SEPTEMBER 19, 26 & OCTOBER 3, 2020 *PUBLISHED WEEKLY FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE WEEKS. NO DELETIONS TO THIS ADVERTISING LIST CAN BE MADE. Page 2 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE Page 3 Page 4 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE 3812 AUGUSTA
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Record
    BULL MOOSE SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE/COLORADO BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS/COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED/COLORADO WILDLIFE FEDERATION/NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION/THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP/TROUT UNLIMITED/WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE Sportsmen's Recommendations for Supporting the Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule Problem 1: At 562,000 acres, the upper tier category in the preferred alternative is too small and fails to include much of the most important fish and wildlife habitat. Solution: After further upper tier areas are included by the agency for the Pike-San Isabel and Rio Grande national forests, the acreage of upper tier lands in the preferred alternative should increase to a total of at least 1.4 million acres (33% of Colorado's road less acres) using the prioritized list of road less areas below. Upper tier lands bordering Community Protection Zones may be cut back in acreage so the bordering areas are not included in the upper tier (the overlap is roughly 22,000 acres total). All Alternative 2 lands already placed in upper tier should remain there. Rationale: The upper tier category has been created to balance narrowly defined exceptions in the CO rule such as coal mining, ski area development, and community protection zone logging. This is very similar to the "Primitive" and "Wild Land Recreation" categories used to balance development allowances in the Idaho roadless rule. While important, the preferred alternative (alt. 2) acres are limited to areas where forest plans already prohibit road building. Using these acres as upper tier does not address key fish and wildlife habitat nor does it illustrate a commitment by the Forest Service to go beyond their current plans and create a truly protective rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild
    WILD FIRE INVASIVE AIR QUALITY EDUCATION OPP FOR REC SITE OUTFITTER ADEQUATE PLAN INFORMATION IM UPWARD IM NEEDS BASELINE FOREST WILD MANAGED TOTAL PLANS PLANTS VALUES PLANS SOLITUDE INVENTORY GUIDE NO OG STANDARDS MANAGEMENT REP DATA ASSESSMNT WORKFORCE IM VOLUNTEERS REGION NUMBER FOREST NAME WILDERNESS NAME ID TO STD? SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE FLAG SCORE SCORE COMPL FLAG COMPL FLAG SCORE USED EFF FLAG 02 02 BIGHORN NATIONAL CLOUD PEAK 080 Y 76 8 10 10 6 4 8 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 03 BLACK HILLS NATIONAL BLACK ELK WILDERNESS 172 Y 84 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP FOSSIL RIDGE 416 N 59 6 5 2 6 8 8 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LA GARITA WILDERNESS 032 Y 61 6 3 10 4 6 8 8 N 6 6 Y N 4 Y GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LIZARD HEAD 040 N 47 6 3 2 4 6 4 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP MOUNT SNEFFELS 167 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP POWDERHORN 413 Y 62 6 6 2 6 8 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP RAGGEDS WILDERNESS 170 Y 62 0 6 10 6 6 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP UNCOMPAHGRE 037 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP WEST ELK WILDERNESS 039 N 56 0 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT ENCAMPMENT RIVER 327 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Action Pike National Forest & San Isabel
    (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! Indian (! Hills Tiny Town Square Top (! Montezuma Mountain (! 24 (! Fenders ¤£ (! Frisco Mt. Gilman Evans (! Mt. Evans Conifer Parker (! Redcliff Burning (! (! Bear Breckenridge 285 (! ¤£ Jefferson Mt. Evans Louviers (! 25 Grant ¨¦§ (! Singleton 91 (! Sedalia (! (! Kokomo (! (!9 Lost Creek East Pine Bailey (! Boreas (! South Platte (! 67 Franktown (! (! (! (! Climax (! ! Jefferson Lost Creek Buffalo Creek ( Lost Creek West (! SKI East Castle Rock Elizabeth COOPER (! Holy (! Cross Silverheels Como Gunbarrel (! Lost Creek West Lost Alma Green (! Creek East Mountain Mt Massive Leadville Mt Massive (! Rampart West (! Fairplay Lost Larkspur (! Creek Elbert (! East 24 Thunder ¤£ Lost Creek Rampart East South Butte Farnum Sheep Weston Rock Mt. Buffalo Peaks Westcreek (! Elbert Peaks Tarryall West (! (! Palmer Lake Mt. Elbert Garo ¤£285 (! Twin Lakes Lost Creek (! Buffalo 82 South (! Peaks Elk Mountains - Buffalo Collegiate West Granite East 67 Elk Mountain - (! Peaks (! Collegiate North West (! (! Hartsel Lake George Elk Mountain - ¤£24 Puma (! (! Woodland Park Collegiate North Elk Mountain - Crystola Buffalo Peaks (! Collegiate North (! (! Divide South Florissant 24 ¤£ (! Falcon Pikeview (! Cascade Pikes (! Papeton Pikes Peak (! Elk Mountain - Peak East Collegiate South Buena Vista West (! Thirtynine Mile Mountain (!Colorado Springs Kreutzer-Princeton (! Broadmoor Guffey (! Security (!Nathrop (! Kreutzer-Princeton Cripple Creek (! Victor Aspen Ridge (! Fountain Romley Mount Antero (!9 Pitkin (! Ohio
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Isabel NF Sangre De Cristo Wilderness
    Arapaho Eagles Nest Square Top Wilderness Mountain NF MountMount Evans Evans Wilderness Mount Evans Burning Bear White River NF Jefferson Mount Holy Evans Cross Lost Creek East Wilderness Boreas Hoosier Ridge Lost Creek East Holy Chicago Ridge Cross Holy Cross Silverheels Gunbarrel Lost Creek West Lost Creek Green Wilderness Mountain Mount Massive Lost Creek East Rampart Hunter- West Mount Massive Pike NF Fryingpan Thunder Wilderness Butte Rampart Wilderness East Lost Sheep Farnum Creek Rock South Weston Peak Schoolmarm Mt. Elbert Buffalo Mountain Peaks West Buffalo Elk Mountain- Peaks Collegiate West East Elk Mountain- Collegiate North Buffalo Peaks Elk Mountain- Collegiate North Wilderness Puma Hills Buffalo Peaks South Collegiate Peaks Wilderness Pikes Peak West Pikes Peak East Elk Mountain- Collegiate South Thirtynine Mile Mountain Kaufman Ridge Kreutzer-Princeton San Aspen Ridge Isabel Little Fountain Creek Romley Fossil Ridge Recreation NF Management Area Mount Antero Badger Gunnison NF Creek Chipeta Methodist Mountain Sangre de Cristo: Silverheels Gulch to Hunts Creek Starvation Creek Sangre de Cristo: West Creek to Big Cottonwood Tanner Peak Highline Sangre de Cristo: Lake Creek to Hermit Creek Babcock Sangre Hardscrabble Hole De Cristo Wilderness Scraggy Peaks Sangre de Cristo: Antelope Alvarado Campground Creek to Music Pass St. Charles Peak ** Map Key ** Sangre de Cristo: Alvarado Campground to Music Pass Greenhorn Mountain: Reveille Canyon Little Saint Charles Creek Proposed Colorado Roadless Areas (CRAs) to Greenhorn Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Revised Statutes 2020 TITLE 30
    Colorado Revised Statutes 2020 TITLE 30 GOVERNMENT - COUNTY COMPENSATION - FEES ARTICLE 1 Fees - General Cross references: For fees of county officers, see § 15 of art. XIV, Colo. Const. 30-1-101. Classification of counties - fixing fees. (1) For the purpose of fixing fees, chargeable and to be collected by county and other officers, and for no other purpose, the several counties of this state are divided into five classes, which classes shall be known as the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth, as follows: (a) The city and county of Denver is a county of the first class; (b) The counties of Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Douglas, El Paso, Jefferson, Pueblo, and Weld are counties of the second class; (c) The counties of Delta, Garfield, Larimer, Las Animas, Logan, Mesa, Montezuma, Montrose, Morgan, and Otero are counties of the third class; (d) The counties of Alamosa, Archuleta, Bent, city and county of Broomfield, Chaffee, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Eagle, Elbert, Fremont, Gilpin, Gunnison, Huerfano, Kit Carson, Lake, La Plata, Lincoln, Ouray, Park, Phillips, Prowers, Rio Grande, Routt, Saguache, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Teller, Washington, and Yuma are counties of the fourth class; (e) The counties of Baca, Custer, Dolores, Grand, Hinsdale, Jackson, Kiowa, Mineral, Moffat, Pitkin, Rio Blanco, San Juan, and Summit are counties of the fifth class. Source: L. 1891: p. 200, § 1. R.S. 08: § 2521. L. 13: p. 276, § 1. C.L. § 7869. L. 25: p. 243, § 1. CSA: C. 66, § 3. CRS 53: § 56-4-1. C.R.S. 1963: § 56-4-1. L. 69: p.
    [Show full text]