Matrices in Polarization Optics Polarized Light
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Polarization Optics Polarized Light Propagation Partially Polarized Light
The physics of polarization optics Polarized light propagation Partially polarized light Polarization Optics N. Fressengeas Laboratoire Mat´eriaux Optiques, Photonique et Syst`emes Unit´ede Recherche commune `al’Universit´ede Lorraine et `aSup´elec Download this document from http://arche.univ-lorraine.fr/ N. Fressengeas Polarization Optics, version 2.0, frame 1 The physics of polarization optics Polarized light propagation Partially polarized light Further reading [Hua94, GB94] A. Gerrard and J.M. Burch. Introduction to matrix methods in optics. Dover, 1994. S. Huard. Polarisation de la lumi`ere. Masson, 1994. N. Fressengeas Polarization Optics, version 2.0, frame 2 The physics of polarization optics Polarized light propagation Partially polarized light Course Outline 1 The physics of polarization optics Polarization states Jones Calculus Stokes parameters and the Poincare Sphere 2 Polarized light propagation Jones Matrices Examples Matrix, basis & eigen polarizations Jones Matrices Composition 3 Partially polarized light Formalisms used Propagation through optical devices N. Fressengeas Polarization Optics, version 2.0, frame 3 The physics of polarization optics Polarization states Polarized light propagation Jones Calculus Partially polarized light Stokes parameters and the Poincare Sphere The vector nature of light Optical wave can be polarized, sound waves cannot The scalar monochromatic plane wave The electric field reads: A cos (ωt kz ϕ) − − A vector monochromatic plane wave Electric field is orthogonal to wave and Poynting vectors -
Dual Beam Detection Technique to Study Magneto-Optical Kerr
DUAL BEAM DETECTION TECHNIQUE TO STUDY MAGNETO-OPTICAL KERR EFFECT By Shankar Chandra Acharya, Msc A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a Major in Physics May 2019 Committee Members: Wilhelmus J Geerts, Chair Nikoleta Theodoropoulou Alexander Zakhidov COPYRIGHT By Shankar Chandra Acharya 2019 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Shankar Chandra Acharya, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to than my supervisor Dr. Wilhelmus J Geerts for his constant support and guidance. I feel grateful to have worked under such an inspiring researcher who has given me this opportunity to learn and explore scientific knowledge. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Nikoleta Theodoropoulou and Dr. Alexander Zakhidov for their constructive feedback which have contributed to my thesis project. I am grateful for my family and friends for their motivation and encouragement all these years of my studies. My mother and father have supported me during the difficult times and inspired me throughout my research. -
De Sénarmont Bias Retardation in DIC Microscopy Stanley Schwartz1, Douglas B
de Sénarmont Bias Retardation in DIC Microscopy Stanley Schwartz1, Douglas B. Murphy2, Kenneth R. Spring3, and Michael W. Davidson4 1Bioscience Department, Nikon Instruments, Inc., 1300 Walt Whitman Road, Melville, New York 11747. 2Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy and Microscope Facility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe Street, 107 WBSB, Baltimore, Maryland 21205. 3National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 6N260, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 4National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 3231 Keywords: microscopy, de Senarmont, Henri Hureau de Sénarmont, Francis Smith, Georges Nomarski, William Hyde Wollaston, Michel- Levy color chart, contrast-enhancement techniques, depth of field, bias, retardation, compensating, plates, DIC, differential interference, contrast, prisms, compensators, shadow-cast, relief, pseudo, three-dimensional, birefringence, optical staining, sectioning, spherical aberrations, wavefronts, shear, fast, slow, axes, axis, linear, circularly, elliptically, polarized light, polarizers, analyzers, orthogonal, path, differences, OPD, gradients, phase, ordinary, extraordinary, maximum extinction, quarter-wavelength, full-wave plates, first-order red, halo, artifacts, interference plane, VEC, video enhanced, VE-DIC, Newtonian, interference colors, Nikon, Eclipse E600, microscopes, buccal, mucosa, epithelial, cheek cells, ctenoid, fish scales, Obelia, hydroids, polyps, coelenterates, murine, rodents, rats, -
Outline • Types of Polarization • Jones' Matrices • Birefringence • Polarizing Optical Components • Polarization in Scattering
Polarization Ivan Bazarov Cornell Physics Department / CLASSE Outline • Types of polarization • Jones’ matrices • Birefringence • Polarizing optical components • Polarization in scattering 1 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Polarization ellipse For light traveling along z direction: k E = vB ⇥ with a complex amplitude: The electric field traces out an ellipse: 2 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Polarization ellipse Polarization types: • linearly polarized light • circularly polarized light • unpolarized light (non-laser) 3 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Linear & circular polarizations linearly polarized light circularly polarized light Right CCW Left CW 4 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Unpolarized light? Unpolarized light means random (time-changing) polarization direction, e.g. excited atoms in a solid (a light bulb) emit randomly polarized light packets. 5 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Jones vector We can represent any monochromatic wave polarization as a Jones’ vector: For normalized intensity : E.g. orthogonal polarizations whenever J0 J =0 1 · 2 6 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Exercises Ex1: Check that HLP and VLP are orthogonal as well as RCP and LCP. Q: What does it mean? A: can use either as a basis to represent arbitrary polarization! Ex2: How to obtain the light intensity from its Jones vector (if in vacuum)? Ax 2 2 J0 J =[Ax⇤ Ay⇤] = Ax + Ay · Ay | | | | 7 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Jones matrix (don’t work with unpolarized light!) Normal modes: TJ = µJ 8 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Combining polarization devices & tilt Simply multiply the matrices in the reverse order: T1 T2 T3 T = T3T2T1 If polarization device is rotated, use: Proof: using , we get 9 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Linear polarizer Linear polarizer in x-direction A polarizer rotated by angle q 10 Polarization P3330 Exp Optics FA’2016 Polarization retarders or wave plates These devices do not affect one polarization component (fast axis) but add a retarding phase to the other component (slow axis). -
Instrumental Optics
Instrumental optics lecture 3 13 March 2020 Lecture 2 – summary 1. Optical materials (UV, VIS, IR) 2. Anisotropic media (ctd) • Double refraction 2. Anisotropic media • Refractive index: no, ne() • Permittivity tensor • Birefringent materials – calcite, • Optical axis YVO4, quartz • Ordinary wave Polarization perpendicular to o.a.-푘 plane • Extraordinary wave Polarization in o.a.-푘 plane • Birefringent walk-off 3. Polarization of light • Wave vector ellipsoid • states of polarization Polarization of light linear circular elliptical 휋 휋 Δ휙 = 0, sin Θ = 퐸 /퐸 Δ휙 = , 퐸 = 퐸 Δ휙 ∈ (0, ) 푦 푥 2 푥 푦 2 Plane wave, 푘||푧, 푧 = const: • Fully polarized light 푖(휔푡+휙푥) 퐸푥(푡) 퐸0푥푒 퐸0푥 • Partially polarized light 푖(휔푡+휙 ) i(휔푡+휙푥) iΔ휙 퐸 푡 = 퐸푦(푡) = 퐸 푒 푦 =e 퐸 e • Fully depolarized light 0푦 0푦 0 0 0 Δ휙 = 휙푦 − 휙푥 Note: electric polarization 푃(퐸) vs. polarization of a wave! Linear polarizers Key parameter: Other parameters: 퐼 extinction coefficient, 푦 • Spectral range, 퐼푥 • damage threshold, (assumption: incident light is • angle of incidence, unpolarized!) • beam geometry For polarizing beamsplitters: 2 extinction coefficients, reflection typically worse • clear aperture Polarizer types: • Dichroic • Crystalline • Thin-film Dichroic polarizers Dichroic polarizer: • Made from material with anisotropic absorption (or reflection) coefficient long, „conductive” molecules/structures • Polaroid: polyvinyl alcohol + iodine – one polarization component is absorbed. • Cheap, large aperture, broadband, poor extinction, low damage threshold • Wire grid / nanowire: -
Lab #6 Polarization
EELE482 Fall 2014 Lab #6 Lab #6 Polarization Contents: Pre-laboratory exercise 2 Introduction 2 1. Polarization of the HeNe laser 3 2. Polarizer extinction ratio 4 3. Wave Plates 4 4. Pseudo Isolator 5 References 5 Polarization Page 1 EELE482 Fall 2014 Lab #6 Pre-Laboratory Exercise Bring a pair of polarized sunglasses or other polarized optics to measure in the lab. Introduction The purpose of this lab it to gain familiarity with the concept of polarization, and with various polarization components including glass-film polarizers, polarizing beam splitters, and quarter wave and half wave plates. We will also investigate how reflections can change the polarization state of light. Within the paraxial limit, light propagates as an electromagnetic wave with transverse electric and magnetic (TEM) field directions, where the electric field component is orthogonal to the magnetic field component, and to the direction of propagation. We can account for this vector (directional) nature of the light wave without abandoning our scalar wave treatment if we assume that the x^ -directed electric field component and y^ -directed electric field component are independent of each other. This assumption is valid within the paraxial approximation for isotropic linear media. The “polarization” state of the light wave describes the relationship between these x^ -directed and y^ -directed components of the wave. If the light wave is monochromatic, the x and y components must have a fixed phase relationship to each other. If the tip of the electric field vector E = Ex x^ + Ey y^ were observed over time at a particular z plane, one would see that it traces out an ellipse. -
Chapter 8 Polarization
Phys 322 Chapter 8 Lecture 22 Polarization Reminder: Exam 2, October 22nd (see webpage) Dichroism = selective absorption of light of certain polarization Linear dichroism - selective absorption of one of the two P-state (linear) orthogonal polarizations Circular dichroism - selective absorption of L-state or R-state circular polarizations Using dichroic materials one can build a polarizer Dichroic crystals Anisotropic crystal structure: one polarization is absorbed more than the other Example: tourmaline Elastic constants for electrons may be different along two axes Polaroid 1928: dichroic sheet polarizer, J-sheet long tiny crystals of herapathite aligned in the plastic sheet Edwin Land 1938: H-sheet 1909-1991 Attach Iodine molecules to polymer molecules - molecular size iodine wires Presently produced: HN-38, HN-32, HN-22 Birefringence Elastic constants for electrons may be different along axes Resonance frequencies will be different for light polarized Refraction index depends on along different axes polarization: birefringence Dichroic crystal - absorbs one of the orthogonal P-states, transmits the other Optic axis of a crystal: the direction of linear polarization along which the resonance is different from the other two axes (assuming them equal) Calcite (CaCO3) Ca C O Image doubles Ordinary rays (o-rays) - unbent Extraordinary rays (e-rays) - bend Calcite (CaCO3) emerging rays are orthogonaly polarized Principal plane - any plane that contains optical axis Principal section - principal plane that is normal to one of the cleavage -
Optimized Morphologic Evaluation of Biostructures by Examination in Polarized Light and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
Rom J Leg Med [22] 275-282 [2014] DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2014.275 © 2014 Romanian Society of Legal Medicine Optimized morphologic evaluation of biostructures by examination in polarized light and differential interference contrast microscopy Elena Patrascu1, Petru Razvan Melinte1, Gheorghe S. Dragoi2,* _________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: Differential interference contrast microscopy (DIC) was possible after the invention of Wollaston prisms that were modified by Nomarski and could duplicate linear polarized light before passing through a specimen (Condenser DIC prism) and to recompose it afterwards (Objective DIC prism), thus creating the phenomenon of interference that depends on the thickness and birefringence of the studied structures. The authors proposed themselves to discuss the performances of this microscope and to widen the area of its usage in the optimized microanatomic analysis of cells and tissues on the native or stained sections. The authors consider it necessary to use DIC microscopy both in forensic medicine (identification of diatoms) as well as in reproduction biology (spermogram) and in early discovery of uterine cervix cancer. Key Words: DIC microscopy, Wollaston prism, Nomarski prism, polarized light, interference. he progresses achieved in the area of wave (Maxwell, 1864) [2] and has a photogenic improvement and diversification of structure (Einstein, 1921) [3]. It consists of an electric T optic systems determined the increase of photonic and a magnetic field, orthogonal, which vibrate in microscopes performances regarding the phase contrast, phase, in the direction of propagation. Within an polarized light and not least, differential interference electromagnetic wave, the electric and the magnetic contrast (DIC) examinations.They assure nowadays fields oscillate simultaneously, but in different planes. -
Optic Axis of a Crystal: the Direction of Linear Polarization Along Which the Resonance Is Different from the Other Two Axes (Assuming Them Equal) Calcite (Caco3)
Phys 322 Chapter 8 Lecture 22 Polarization Dichroism = selective absorption of light of certain polarization Linear dichroism - selective absorption of one of the two P-state (linear) orthogonal polarizations Circular dichroism - selective absorption of L-state or R-state circular polarizations Using dichroic materials one can build a polarizer Dichroic crystals Anisotropic crystal structure: one polarization is absorbed more than the other Example: tourmaline Elastic constants for electrons may be different along two axes Polaroid 1928: dichroic sheet polarizer, J-sheet long tiny crystals of herapathite aligned in the plastic sheet Edwin Land 1938: H-sheet 1909-1991 Attach Iodine molecules to polymer molecules - molecular size iodine wires Presently produced: HN-38, HN-32, HN-22 Birefringence Elastic constants for electrons may be different along axes Resonance frequencies will be different for light polarized Refraction index depends on along different axes polarization: birefringence Dichroic crystal - absorbs one of the orthogonal P-states, transmits the other Optic axis of a crystal: the direction of linear polarization along which the resonance is different from the other two axes (assuming them equal) Calcite (CaCO3) Ca C O Image doubles Ordinary rays (o-rays) - unbent Extraordinary rays (e-rays) - bend Calcite (CaCO3) emerging rays are orthogonaly polarized Principal plane - any plane that contains optical axis Principal section - principal plane that is normal to one of the cleavage surfaces Birefringence and Huygens’ principle -
Modeling and Measuring the Polarization of Light: from Jones Matrices to Ellipsometry
MODELING AND MEASURING THE POLARIZATION OF LIGHT: FROM JONES MATRICES TO ELLIPSOMETRY OVERALL GOALS The Polarization of Light lab strongly emphasizes connecting mathematical formalism with measurable results. It is not your job to understand every aspect of the theory, but rather to understand it well enough to make predictions in a variety of experimental situations. The model developed in this lab will have parameters that are easily experimentally adjustable. Additionally, you will refine your predictive models by accounting for systematic error sources that occur in the apparatus. The overarching goals for the lab are to: Model the vector nature of light. (Week 1) Model optical components that manipulate polarization (e.g., polarizing filters and quarter-wave plates). (Week 1) Measure a general polarization state of light. (Week 1) Model and measure the reflection and transmission of light at a dielectric interface. (Week 2) Perform an ellipsometry measurement on a Lucite surface. WEEK 1 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS Question 1 Set up the optical arrangement shown in Figure 1. It consists of (1) a laser, (2) Polarizing filters, (3) A quarter-wave plate (4) A photodetector. Observe the variation in the photodetector voltage as you rotate the polarizing filters and/or quarter-wave plate. This is as complicated as the apparatus gets. The challenge of week 1 is to build accurate models of these components and model their combined effect in an optical system. An understanding of polarized light and polarizing optical elements forms the foundation of many optical applications including AMO experiments such as magneto-optical traps, LCD displays, and 3D projectors. -
OPTI 484/584: Polarized Light and Polarimetry Effective Spring 2015 Replaces: OPTI 623 Course Description
OPTI 484/584: Polarized Light and Polarimetry Effective Spring 2015 Replaces: OPTI 623 Course Description: Polarized light and the Poincare sphere. Polarization in natural scenes and animal vision. Polarization elements: polarizers, retarders, and depolarizers. Jones and Mueller polarization calculus. Polarimetry: measuring the polarization properties of optical elements and materials. Polarization modulators and controllers. Polarization dependent loss and polarization mode dispersion in fiber optics. Advanced polarization issues in optical devices and systems. Pre-requisites: OPTI 501: Electromagnetic Waves/OPTI 330: Physical Optics II, or equivalent Number of Units/ component: 3 units/ lecture Locations and Times: T/R: 2:00 – 3:15 pm, Meinel Optical Sciences room 305 Instructor Information: Russell A. Chipman, Professor College of Optical Sciences, Room 737 The University of Arizona 1630 East University Boulevard Tucson, AZ 85721 Phone: 520-626-9435 [email protected] Expected Learning Outcomes: 1. Understand the relationship and differences between the Jones vector and Stokes parameter descriptions for polarized light. 2. Explain the operation of polarizers and retarders. 3. Be able to measure Stokes parameters and interpret Stokes images. 4. Understand the difference between linear retarders, elliptical retarders, and circular retarders and their Jones and Mueller matrices. 5. Describe five ways to electrically control polarization state. 6. Explain how liquid crystal displays can be fabricated from Twisted Nematic cells and VAN-mode cells. Required Texts: Course Notes: The instructor’s notes are used as the text and will be distributed periodically throughout the term. No other texts are required. Course notes are not available in electronic form. Notes are not to be copied or scanned into electronic form. -
Constraints on Jones Transmission Matrices from Time-Reversal
Constraints on Jones transmission matrices from time-reversal invariance and discrete spatial symmetries N.P. Armitage1 1The Institute for Quantum Matter, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA (Dated: May 23, 2014) Optical spectroscopies are most often used to probe dynamical correlations in materials, but they are also a probe of symmetry. Polarization anisotropies are of course sensitive to structural anisotropies, but have been much less used as a probe of more exotic symmetry breakings in ordered states. In this paper a Jones transfer matrix formalism is discussed to infer the existence of exotic broken symmetry states of matter from their electrodynamic response for a full complement of possible broken symmetries including reflection, rotation, rotation-reflection, inversion, and time- reversal. A specific condition to distinguish the case of macroscopic time-reversal symmetry breaking is particularly important as in a dynamical experiment like optics, one must distinguish reciprocity from time-reversal symmetry as dissipation violates strict time-reversal symmetry of an experiment. Different forms of reciprocity can be distinguished, but only one is a sufficient (but not necessary) condition for macroscopic time-reversal symmetry breaking. I show the constraints that a Jones matrix develops under the presence or absence of such symmetries. These constraints typically appear in the form of an algebra relating matrix elements or overall constraints (transposition, unitarity, hermiticity, normality, etc.) on the form of the Jones matrix. I work out a number of examples including the trivial case of a ferromagnet, and the less trivial cases of magnetoelectrics and vector and scalar spin “chiral” states.