This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights Author's personal copy Quaternary Science Reviews 68 (2013) 200e215 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Environmental conditions in the SE Balkans since the Last Glacial Maximum and their influence on the spread of agriculture into Europe Simon E. Connor a,b,*, Shawn A. Ross c, Adela Sobotkova c, Andy I.R. Herries d, Scott D. Mooney e, Catherine Longford f, Ilia Iliev g a Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, Campus de Gambelas, University of the Algarve, Faro 8005-139, Portugal b School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia c School of Humanities, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia d Australian Archaeomagnetism Laboratory, Archaeology Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia e School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia f Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S1 4ET, United Kingdom g Yambol Regional Historical Museum, 2 Byalo More St., Yambol 8600, Bulgaria article info abstract Article history: The Thracian Plain in the SE Balkans was one of the main corridors through which Neolithic agriculture Received 28 May 2012 spread into continental Europe. Previous studies have invoked rapid sea-level and climatic changes to Received in revised form explain the timing of agricultural expansion. We present a new record of vegetation, fire and lacustrine 5 February 2013 sedimentation from Bulgarian Thrace to examine environmental change in this region since the Last Accepted 7 February 2013 Glacial Maximum. Our record indicates the persistence of cold steppe vegetation from w37,500 to Available online 17,900 cal. a BP, semidesert vegetation from w17,900 to 10,300 cal. a BP, forest-steppe vegetation from w10,300 to 8900 cal. a BP, and mixed oak woods from w8900 to 4000 cal. a BP, followed by widespread Keywords: Pollen deforestation, burning and grazing. Early-Holocene forest expansion in Bulgarian Thrace closely followed ’ fl Charcoal changes in the Black Sea s regional moisture balance and appears to have been in uenced by solar-forced Magnetic susceptibility changes in seasonality. We suggest that climatic aridity and/or enhanced seasonality e lasting until at Late Quaternary least w8900 cal. a BP e could have delayed the spread of early agriculture from the Aegean coast into Early agriculture the continental lowlands of the Balkans and thence into the rest of Europe. Neolithic transition Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction climatic event and Black Sea flood, had major impacts on the Neolithic transition (Ryan et al.,1997; Weninger et al., 2006; Turney Climate changes during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene and Brown, 2007; Pross et al., 2009). While the precise timing of the triggered major migrations of species and biomes in temperate arrival of Neolithic agriculture in SE Europe remains contentious, latitudes (Roberts, 1998; McGlone et al., 2012). A potential example there is general agreement that farming reached the Aegean coast of this is the spread of Neolithic farming into Europe, which somewhat earlier than the Balkans’ inland valleys and plains resulted in the transmission of technology, cultural traditions, ge- (Boyadziev, 1995, 2009; Perles, 2004; Turney and Brown, 2007; netic heritage and multiple plant and animal species from Western Reingruber and Thissen, 2009; Pinhasi et al., 2012). Asia. The degree to which environmental change influenced this Geographical factors mean that the Thracian Plain is one of the complex and essentially cultural event remains the topic of a vast probable corridors through which agriculture made its way into the scientific debate (e.g. Weninger et al., 2006; Turney and Brown, rest of Europe (Bocquet-Appel et al., 2009; Özdogan, 2011). The first 2007; Bocquet-Appel et al., 2009; Pross et al., 2009; Haak et al., agricultural settlements in Bulgarian Thrace date to around 2010; Özdogan, 2011; Magyari et al., 2012). It has been argued 8000 cal. a BP (Boyadziev, 1995, 2009). Until now there has been no that rapid environmental changes, such as the 8200 cal. a BP direct palaeoenvironmental evidence from this area to enlighten debate about the causes of the apparent delay in agricultural expansion. Here we present a late-Quaternary pollen, non-pollen paly- nomorph, magnetic susceptibility and charcoal record from a site * Corresponding author. School of Geography and Environmental Science, Mon- ’ ash University, VIC 3800, Australia. Tel.: þ61 3 99054619; fax: þ61 3 99052948. that was formerly Bulgaria s largest inland water body. Our aim is to E-mail address: [email protected] (S.E. Connor). address the following questions: 0277-3791/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.02.011 Author's personal copy S.E. Connor et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 68 (2013) 200e215 201 1. How did the vegetation of the Thracian Plain respond to These studies unanimously assert that the Thracian Plain was climate changes since the Last Glacial Maximum? dominated by oak forests prior to clearing associated with agri- 2. Could the environment have influenced the Neolithic transition culture, but none provide direct palynological evidence that would to agriculture? support such a claim. Oak pollen never exceeds 20% in mid to late 3. Is Neolithic and later human activity registered Holocene pollen records from Sadovo and Straldzha, leading the palaeoecologically? authors of these studies to conclude that the Thracian Plain’s oak forests were destroyed prior to w4000 cal. a BP (Filipovitch and 1.1. Regional setting Stojanova, 1990; Tonkov et al., 2008a, 2009). Chapman et al. (2009) suggest that oak trees grew around the Ezero wetlands The Thracian Plain is a fertile basin wedged between the (Fig. 1) in the early-mid Holocene, but present pollen and macro- e mountain chains of the Balkans and the coastlines of the Aegean, fossil diagrams covering a later period (3200 2200 cal. a BP) and Marmara and Black Seas. Throughout its history, the plain has acted indicating deforested, agricultural landscapes. Only marine sedi- as a cultural conduit between East and West, criss-crossed by trade ments from the Black Sea provide good evidence for the early-mid routes and rich in archaeological remains. It was one of the main Holocene expansion of Quercus; the timing of subsequent defor- routes by which agriculture made its way into Europe from West- estation is unclear, however, with some marine and coastal records ern Asia, and was home to Europe’s earliest metalworking cultures showing an abrupt decline in Quercus around 6000 cal. a BP and (Renfrew, 1978; Bailey, 2000; Bocquet-Appel et al., 2009; Haak others showing no decline at all (Bozilova and Beug, 1994; et al., 2010). Archaeobotanically, six Neolithic sites on the Thra- Atanassova, 2005; Filipova-Marinova et al., 2011, 2012; see also cian Plain and adjacent foothills have been analysed, showing that Shumilovskikh et al., 2012). In the marine cores, moreover, palae- the full range of Near Eastern crops was cultivated here (Marinova, oecological responses to human impact, climatic changes and sea- fi 2006; Leshtakov et al., 2007). level rise can be dif cult to disentangle (Filipova-Marinova et al., In contrast to other parts of Europe, surprisingly little is known 2011; Shumilovskikh et al., 2012). about the environmental context of early agriculture on the Thra- cian Plain. Previous palynological studies of Bulgaria’s past vege- 2. Material and methods tation have focussed on the mountains (e.g. Tonkov et al., 2011; Marinova et al., 2012) or on present-day coastlines (e.g. Filipova, 2.1. Site description 1985; Bozilova and Beug, 1992). Mountain sites were too remote from early farming populations to directly register the arrival of The Straldzha Mire is located in the Karnobat Lowlands at the agriculture and pastoralism in the region, while the coastal sites foot of the Stara Planina Mountains (Fig. 2). These lowlands are part began to form as sea-levels rose 8000e6000 years ago, usually of the pre-Balkan sunkland that extends westward to the Bulgarian missing the early-Holocene advent of agriculture altogether. The capital, Sofia(Georgiev, 1991). The mire occupies a large, shallow lowlands, where most of the Neolithic settlements were situated, depression underlain by Pleistocene silts and gravels and is sur- lack detailed palaeoenvironmental records (Marinova and rounded by low hills of Upper Cretaceous limestones, marls and Thiebault, 2008; Marinova et al., 2012). The few pollen data that volcanic deposits (Stoyneva and Michev, 2007; Tonkov et al., exist from Bulgaria’s Thracian Plain miss the early Holocene alto- 2008a). The mire formerly covered an area of around 14,000 ha gether (Filipovitch and Stojanova, 1990; Magyari et al., 2008; (Bonchev, 1929), making it the largest freshwater wetland basin in Tonkov et al., 2008a, 2009). Bulgaria. 22º 24º 26º 28º BUCHAREST 44º ROMANIA Danube R. 11 EUROPE 8 BULGARIA Straldzha 4 SOFIA BLACK 5 Mire SEA 1 LEGEND 3 10 9 Upper Thrace 42º Maritsa 14 Straldzha Mire Struma 6 7 Other pollen sites 2 12 Capital cities Eastern ISTANBUL Rivers and lakes 13 Western Thrace Thrace MARMARA 100m isobath GREECE SEA 0 - 200 m a.s.l.
Recommended publications
  • Company Profile
    www.ecobulpack.com COMPANY PROFILE KEEP BULGARIA CLEAN FOR THE CHILDREN! PHILIPPE ROMBAUT Chairman of the Board of Directors of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of AGROPOLYCHIM JSC-Devnia e, ECOBULPACK are dedicated to keeping clean the environment of the country we live Wand raise our children in. This is why we rely on good partnerships with the State and Municipal Authorities, as well as the responsible business managers who have supported our efforts from the very beginning of our activity. Because all together we believe in the cause: “Keep Bulgaria clean for the children!” VIDIO VIDEV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of NIVA JSC-Kostinbrod,VIDONA JSC-Yambol t ECOBULPACK we guarantee the balance of interests between the companies releasing A packed goods on the market, on one hand, and the companies collecting and recycling waste, on the other. Thus we manage waste throughout its course - from generation to recycling. The funds ECOBULPACK accumulates are invested in the establishment of sustainable municipal separate waste collection systems following established European models with proven efficiency. DIMITAR ZOROV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Owner of “PARSHEVITSA” Dairy Products ince the establishment of the company we have relied on the principles of democracy as Swell as on an open and fair strategy. We welcome new shareholders. We offer the business an alternative in fulfilling its obligations to utilize packaged waste, while meeting national legislative requirements. We achieve shared responsibilities and reduce companies’ product- packaging fees. MILEN DIMITROV Procurator of ECOBULPACK s a result of our joint efforts and the professionalism of our work, we managed to turn AECOBULPACK JSC into the largest organization utilizing packaging waste, which so far have gained the confidence of more than 3 500 companies operating in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including Offroadmap by Offroad-Bulgaria.Com Version 2021 Q1
    Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including OFFRoadMap by OFFRoad-Bulgaria.com Version 2021 Q2 The purpose of this map is to provide accessible, accurate and up-to-date information for your GPS devices. Despite all efforts made by the creators to achieve this goal, the roads and the data included in this digital map are intended to be used as guidance only and should not be used solely for navigation. The creators of this map make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the map data. In no event will the creators of this map be liable for any damages whatsoever, including but not limited to loss of revenue or profit, lost or damaged data, and expenses, arising in any way from or consequential upon the use of, or the inability to use this digital map. Contents: - Registering your map - Usage details - OFRM Geotrade 2021 Q2 variants - Coverage >>>>> REGISTRATION <<<<< To register your OFRM Geotrade map, please visit out website www.karta.bg. Click on “Create profile” in the top right corner of the screen and create your personal account. When done, the Support page will load automatically. Click on the button “Register OFRM Geotrade” and enter the 25-symbol map serial number and GPS model to activate your map’s update subscription (if your map includes one). To obtain the 25-symbol serial number, connect your GPS device to your computer via USB cable. If you have a GPS device with preloaded OFRM map, you will find the serial number in file “serial.txt” in the root folder of your device’s base memory or in the file “gmapsupp.unl” in folder “Garmin” (or folder “Map” on the newer models of the nüvi series and the new Drive series) of your device’s base memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Union C 435/5
    3.12.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 435/5 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 21 November 2018 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the application for registration of a geographical indication in the spirit drinks sector referred to in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council ‘Ямболска гроздова ракия/Гроздова ракия от Ямбол/Yambolska grozdova rakya/Grozdova rakya ot Yambol’ (2018/C 435/05) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15y Januar 2008 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89 (1), and in particular Article 17(6) thereof, Whereas: (1) The Republic of Bulgaria has sent an application for registration of the name ‘Ямболска гроздова ракия/Гроздова ракия от Ямбол/Yambolska grozdova rakya/Grozdova rakya ot Yambol’ in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 as geographical indication in accordance with Article 17(1) of that Regulation. (2) In accordance with Articles 17(5) and 17(6) of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 the Commission has examined that application and concluded that it fulfils the conditions laid down in that Regulation. (3) In order to allow for the submission of oppositions in accordance with Article 17(7) of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008, the main specifications
    [Show full text]
  • Xerotyphlops Vermicularis (MERREM, 1820), in the West Bulgarian Rhodope Mountains: Rediscovery After More Than 100 Years
    200 SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 27 (3/4) Wien, 30. Jänner 2015 SHORT NOTE Xerotyphlops vermicularis (MERREM, 1820), in the west Bulgarian Rhodope Mountains: rediscovery after more than 100 years The Eurasian Blind Snake, Xerotyph - lops vermicularis (MERREM, 1820), the only representative of the snake family Typhlo - pidae (Scolecophidia) in Europe (gRil- liTSCH & gRilliTSCH 1993), is found in the southern parts of the Balkan Peninsula, specifically in former yugoslavia (Croatia, FyR Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia), Albania, Bul garia, greece and Turkey (gRilliTSCH & gRilliTSCH 1993; gASC et al. 1997; gRilliTSCH et al. 1999) where it represents a chorotype element of the Turano-Mediterranean fauna (JABlONSki et al. 2012). However, the recent molecular data show that this traditionally accepted species is probably a species complex, since some populations from the Middle East show deep genetic divergences indicating their separate evolution since the end of Middle and late Miocene (kORNiliOS et al. 2012). This species prefers xerothermic habitats with deep, dry and soft (sandy) soil where it can burrow, typically rocky slopes with low, sparse bush vegetation, open areas with stones as well as cultivated fields (gRil liTSCH & gRilliTSCH 1993). The known edge of its distribution in the east of the Balkans is formed by several localities on Bulgarian territory (see BESH- kOv & NANEv 2006; STOJANOv et al. 2011), from where it was originally published only at the beginning of the 20th century (kOvA- CHEv 1912; CHiCHkOFF 1914). in Bul garia, this species has a scattered distribution at altitudes below 500 m above sea level. it is found only in the southern parts of the coun- try where it persisted from an earlier more extended distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters
    Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Status Report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety F+E Project No. 903 19 226 Oktober 2005 Imprint Authors: Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Project management: Adelphi Research gGmbH Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a D – 14193 Berlin Phone: +49-30-8900068-0 Fax: +49-30-8900068-10 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.adelphi-research.de Publisher: The German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety D – 11055 Berlin Phone: +49-01888-305-0 Fax: +49-01888-305 20 44 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmu.de © Adelphi Research gGmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2005 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters i Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Motive and main objectives ........................................................................................1 1.2 Structure of this report................................................................................................3 2 STRATEGIC ROLE OF WATER RESOURCES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY..........5 2.1 Climate and water resources......................................................................................5 2.2 Infrastructure development.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • The Maritsa River
    TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS Text of the intervention made by Mr. Yaşar Yakış Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey During the INBO Conference Istanbul, 18 October 2012 TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ 480 km long ‐ Tundzha, Arda, Ergene ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Cooperation projects with Greece and Bulgaria ‐ Obligations under the EU acquis communautaire ‐ Need for trilateral cooperation ‐ Turkey and the Euphrates‐Tigris Basin ‐ Conclusion TRASNBOUNDARY IMPACTS OF THE MARITSA BASIN PROJECTS ‐ Introduction ‐ The Maritsa River ‐ The Maritsa Basin ‐ Flood potential
    [Show full text]
  • International Poplar Commission
    INTERNATIONAL POPLAR COMMISSION 25th Session Berlin, Germany, 13- 16 September 2016 Poplars and Other Fast-Growing Trees - Renewable Resources for Future Green Economies Synthesis of Country Progress Reports - Activities Related to Poplar and Willow Cultivation and Utilization- 2012 through 2016 September 2016 Forestry Policy and Resources Division Working Paper IPC/15 Forestry Department FAO, Rome, Italy Disclaimer Twenty-one member countries of the IPC, and Moldova, the Russian Federation and Serbia, three non-member countries, have provided national progress reports to the 25th Session of the International Poplar Commission. A synthesis has been made by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations that summarizes issues, highlights status and identifies trends affecting the cultivation, management and utilization of poplars and willows in temperate and boreal regions of the world. Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information, please contact: Mr. Walter Kollert Secretary International Poplar Commission Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 1 I-00153 Rome Italy E-mail: [email protected] For quotation: FAO, 2016. Poplars and Other Fast-Growing Trees - Renewable Resources for Future Green Economies. Synthesis of Country Progress Reports. 25th Session of the International Poplar Commission, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany, 13-16 September 2016. Working Paper IPC/15. Forestry Policy and Resources Division, FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/forestry/ipc2016/en/.
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in Each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” Prepared at the Request of the CONT Committee
    STUDY Requested by CONT Committee The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs Authors: Willem Pieter DE GROEN, Jorge NUNEZ, Daina BELICKA, Roberto EN MUSMECI, Damir GOJSIC and Silvia TADI Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 679.107– January 2021 The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Abstract This report provides the preliminary findings of the study on “The Largest 50 beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” prepared at the request of the CONT committee. It provides the results of an assessment of almost 300 systems for the public disclosure of the beneficiaries of the common agricultural policy (CAP) and cohesion policy. Moreover, it provides the preliminary results for the analysis of about 10 million beneficiaries of the CAP in 2018 and 2019 and more than 500 000 projects receiving cohesion funds between 2014 and 2020. Finally, it assesses the barriers to more data transparency and the possibilities to enhance the transparency. NOTE: This is a pre-release version of the study. Changes may occur based on the final results of the research. For internal use only. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It designated Ms Monika Hohlmeier to follow the study. AUTHORS Willem Pieter DE GROEN, CEPS Jorge NUNEZ, CEPS Daina BELICKA, CSE COE Roberto MUSMECI, CEPS Damir GOJSIC, CEPS Silvia TADI, CEPS The authors would like to thank Daniele Genta, Babak Hakimi and Xinyi Li for their valuable contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Process: Program Data
    FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data Cover.indd 1 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PUBLICATIONS 1 Donor’s Brief 2 Initiator’s Guide 3 Coordinator’s Guide 4 Moderator’s Guide 5 Forum Program Data 6 Forum Films Publisher: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) 3003 Berne www.deza.ch Concept and coordination: Tulum Ltd. CH – 6987 Caslano www.tulum-consult.com The information in this brochure was provided by: Balkan Assist Association, Sofia Foundation for Local Government Reform, Sofia Agency for Socioeconomic Analyses, Sofia Industrieconsult, Sofia Business Center, Svishtov Znanie Association, Lovech NGO Club, Targovishte National Alliance for Volunteer Action, Plovdiv Regional Association of Municipalities “Trakya”, Stara Zagora Center for Sustainable Development of Teteven Municipality, Teteven Compilation and processing: Diana Andreeva and Irena Boneva Summary of the information: Maya Krasteva Introduction texts: Ginka Kapitanova, Iva Taralezhkova and Alex Melzer Layout: Mark Manion, Commusication Arts Orders: SDC Distribution Center Telephone: +41 31 322 44 12 Fax: +41 31 324 13 48 E-mail: [email protected] © SDC 2007 FP Program Data Cover.indd 2 11/20/07 3:03:17 AM FORUM PROCESS PROGRAM DATA FP Program Data.indd 1 11/20/07 8:00:27 AM CONTEnts PROGRAM OVERVIEW ...........................................7 THE SDC FORUM PROGRAM IN BULGARIA 2000–2007..................7 Summary Table 1 – Program Outcome and Volume ..................9 Summary Table 2 – Timetable
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology of Maritsa and Tundzha
    Hydrology of Maritsa and Tundzha The Maritsa/Meric River is the biggest river on the Balkan peninsular. Maritsa catchment is densely populated, highly industrialized and has intensive agriculture. The biggest cities are Plovdiv on the Bulgarian territory, with 650.000 citizens, and Edirne on the Turkish territory, with 231 000 citizens. The biggest tributaries are Tundzha and Arda Rivers, joining Maritsa at Edirne. Within Maritza and Tundja basin, a significant number of reservoirs and cascades were constructed for irrigation purposes, and for Hydro electricity production. The climatic and geographical characteristics of Maritsa and Tundja River Basins lead to specific run-off conditions: flash floods, high inter-annual variability, heavy soil erosion reducing the reservoirs' capacities through sedimentation, etc. The destructive forces of climatic hazards, manifesting themselves in the form of rainstorms, severe thunderstorms, intensive snowmelt, floods and droughts, appear to increase during recent years. After more than 20 years of relative minor floods during wet seasons, large floods started to occur more often since the end of the 90’s. Theses years of absence of large floods resulted in negligence of political action and financial investment for structural and non-structural flood mitigation measures and maintenance of the river bed and its embankments. 1 The morphology of both river systems is somewhat similar: Maritza flows between Pazarjik to Parvomay in a large flat plain where flood expansion would be very large if no dike contained the flows. However these dikes are not very well maintained out of the main cities, which actually protect them in a certain way ; In 2005 the large inundation upstream Plovdiv certainly prevented Maritza from overtopping the dikes in the city ! Downstream Parvomay, the relief becomes more hilly and the flood plains are more reduced in size until the Greek-Turkish borders where the plain becomes again wide and flat.
    [Show full text]