© in This Web Service Cambridge University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
John Dryden and the Late 17Th Century Dramatic Experience Lecture 16 (C) by Asher Ashkar Gohar 1 Credit Hr
JOHN DRYDEN AND THE LATE 17TH CENTURY DRAMATIC EXPERIENCE LECTURE 16 (C) BY ASHER ASHKAR GOHAR 1 CREDIT HR. JOHN DRYDEN (1631 – 1700) HIS LIFE: John Dryden was an English poet, literary critic, translator, and playwright who was made England's first Poet Laureate in 1668. He is seen as dominating the literary life of Restoration England to such a point that the period came to be known in literary circles as the “Age of Dryden”. The son of a country gentleman, Dryden grew up in the country. When he was 11 years old the Civil War broke out. Both his father’s and mother’s families sided with Parliament against the king, but Dryden’s own sympathies in his youth are unknown. About 1644 Dryden was admitted to Westminster School, where he received a predominantly classical education under the celebrated Richard Busby. His easy and lifelong familiarity with classical literature begun at Westminster later resulted in idiomatic English translations. In 1650 he entered Trinity College, Cambridge, where he took his B.A. degree in 1654. What Dryden did between leaving the university in 1654 and the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 is not known with certainty. In 1659 his contribution to a memorial volume for Oliver Cromwell marked him as a poet worth watching. His “heroic stanzas” were mature, considered, sonorous, and sprinkled with those classical and scientific allusions that characterized his later verse. This kind of public poetry was always one of the things Dryden did best. On December 1, 1663, he married Elizabeth Howard, the youngest daughter of Thomas Howard, 1st earl of Berkshire. -
Restoration Verse Satires on Nell Gwyn As Life-Writing
This is a postprint! The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Life Writing 13.4 (Taylor & Francis, 2016): 449-64. http://www.tandfonline.com/DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2015.1073715. ‘Rais’d from a Dunghill, to a King’s Embrace’: Restoration Verse Satires on Nell Gwyn as Life-Writing Dr. Julia Novak University of Salzburg Hertha Firnberg Research Fellow (FWF) Department of English and American Studies University of Salzburg Erzabt-Klotzstraße 1 5020 Salzburg AUSTRIA Tel. +43(0)699 81761689 Email: [email protected] This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under Grant T 589-G23. Abstract Nell Gwyn (1650-1687), one of the very early theatre actresses on the Restoration stage and long-term mistress to King Charles II, has today become a popular cultural icon, revered for her wit and good-naturedness. The image of Gwyn that emerges from Restoration satires, by contrast, is considerably more critical of the king’s actress-mistress. It is this image, arising from satiric references to and verse lives of Nell Gwyn, which forms the focus of this paper. Creating an image – a ‘likeness’ – of the subject is often cited as one of the chief purposes of biography. From the perspective of biography studies, this paper will probe to what extent Restoration verse satire can be read as life-writing and where it can be situated in the context of other 17th-century life-writing forms. It will examine which aspects of Gwyn’s life and character the satires address and what these choices reveal about the purposes of satire as a form of biographical storytelling. -
Jane Milling
ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE ‘“For Without Vanity I’m Better Known”: Restoration Actors and Metatheatre on the London Stage.’ AUTHORS Milling, Jane JOURNAL Theatre Survey DEPOSITED IN ORE 18 March 2013 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/4491 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Theatre Survey 52:1 (May 2011) # American Society for Theatre Research 2011 doi:10.1017/S0040557411000068 Jane Milling “FOR WITHOUT VANITY,I’M BETTER KNOWN”: RESTORATION ACTORS AND METATHEATRE ON THE LONDON STAGE Prologue, To the Duke of Lerma, Spoken by Mrs. Ellen[Nell], and Mrs. Nepp. NEPP: How, Mrs. Ellen, not dress’d yet, and all the Play ready to begin? EL[LEN]: Not so near ready to begin as you think for. NEPP: Why, what’s the matter? ELLEN: The Poet, and the Company are wrangling within. NEPP: About what? ELLEN: A prologue. NEPP: Why, Is’t an ill one? NELL[ELLEN]: Two to one, but it had been so if he had writ any; but the Conscious Poet with much modesty, and very Civilly and Sillily—has writ none.... NEPP: What shall we do then? ’Slife let’s be bold, And speak a Prologue— NELL[ELLEN]: —No, no let us Scold.1 When Samuel Pepys heard Nell Gwyn2 and Elizabeth Knipp3 deliver the prologue to Robert Howard’s The Duke of Lerma, he recorded the experience in his diary: “Knepp and Nell spoke the prologue most excellently, especially Knepp, who spoke beyond any creature I ever heard.”4 By 20 February 1668, when Pepys noted his thoughts, he had known Knipp personally for two years, much to the chagrin of his wife. -
WRAP Theses Crowther 2017.Pdf
A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 97559 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications James Shirley and the Restoration Stage By Stefania Crowther A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Renaissance Studies University of Warwick, Centre for Renaissance Studies June 2017 2 3 Acknowledgements This thesis was supported by the James Shirley Complete Works Project, and funded by the AHRC, and Centre for Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick. I would like to thank these organisations, and in particular Jayne Browne, Ingrid de Smett, David Lines, Jayne Brown, Heather Pilbin, Paul Botley, and especially Elizabeth Clarke and Paul Prescott for their very helpful guidance during the upgrade process. Special thanks are due to Hannah Davis, whose URSS project on Restoration Shirley, supervised by Teresa Grant, provided the starting point for this thesis. I am also enormously grateful to the colleagues, friends and tutors who have inspired and supported my work: Daniel Ashman, Thomasin Bailey, Stephen Clucas, Michael Dobson, Peter Foreshaw, Douglas Hawes, Simon Jackson, Victoria Jones, Griff Jameson, Peter Kirwan, Chris Main, Gerry McAlpine, Zois Pigadas, Catherine Smith, Lee White, Susan Wiseman. -
Nell Gwynn Education Pack
EDUCATION PACK Thanks to our supporters. Contents. Synopsis Music ATC Creative Learning thanks ASB as a key supporter P.05 P.40 of all school-focused activities in 2017. About the period Choreography P.11 P.44 Auckland Theatre Company receives principal and core funding from: About the play Student Activity: P.14 Reflecting on the Play P.48 Director — Colin McColl P.19 Additional Reading Thanks to The Infinity Foundation for its support in delivering and Resources school matinee performances at the ASB Waterfront Theatre in 2017. Set Design P.51 P.24 ATC Creative Learning Costume Design P.52 P.30 Curriculum Links Lighting Design P.52 P.36 ATC Creative Learning also thanks the ATC Patrons and the ATC Supporting Acts for their ongoing generosity. Venue: ASB Waterfront Theatre, 138 Halsey Street, Wynyard Quarter Please note. School matinee: Tuesday 29 August at 11am Running time: 2 hours and 45 minutes, including a 20-minute interval • Eating and drinking in the auditorium is strictly prohibited. Post-Show Takes place in the theatre immediately after the Please make sure all cell phones are turned off • Forum: performance (15 – 20 minutes) Please don’t bring school bags to the theatre. • Suitability: This production is suitable for Year Levels 11 - 13 • Photography or recording of any kind is strictly prohibited. Advisory: Contains occasional use of strong language 1 CAST Nell Gwynn — Claire Chitham | King Charles II — Tim Balme Lord Arlington / John Dryden — Mark Hadlow | Edward Kynaston — Byron Coll Nancy / Queen Catherine — Hera Dunleavy -
Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: the Survival of the London Theatre Community
Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: The Survival of the London Theatre Community By Mary Alex Staude Honors Thesis Department of English and Comparative Literature University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2018 Approved: (Signature of Advisor) Acknowledgements I would like to thank Reid Barbour for his support, guidance, and advice throughout this process. Without his help, this project would not be what it is today. Thanks also to Laura Pates, Adam Maxfield, Alex LaGrand, Aubrey Snowden, Paul Smith, and Playmakers Repertory Company. Also to Diane Naylor at Chatsworth Settlement Trustees. Much love to friends and family for encouraging my excitement about this project. Particular thanks to Nell Ovitt for her gracious enthusiasm, and to Hannah Dent for her unyielding support. I am grateful for the community around me and for the communities that came before my time. Preface Mary Alex Staude worked on Twelfth Night 2017 with Alex LaGrand who worked on King Lear 2016 with Zack Powell who worked on Henry IV Part II 2015 with John Ahlin who worked on Macbeth 2000 with Jerry Hands who worked on Much Ado About Nothing 1984 with Derek Jacobi who worked on Othello 1964 with Laurence Olivier who worked on Romeo and Juliet 1935 with Edith Evans who worked on The Merry Wives of Windsor 1918 with Ellen Terry who worked on The Winter’s Tale 1856 with Charles Kean who worked on Richard III 1776 with David Garrick who worked on Hamlet 1747 with Charles Macklin who worked on Henry IV 1738 with Colley Cibber who worked on Julius Caesar 1707 with Thomas Betterton who worked on Hamlet 1661 with William Davenant who worked on Henry VIII 1637 with John Lowin who worked on Henry VIII 1613 with John Heminges who worked on Hamlet 1603 with William Shakespeare. -
Information to Users
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back o f the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 WOMEN PLAYWRIGHTS DURING THE STRUGGLE FOR CONTROL OF THE LONDON THEATRE, 1695-1710 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Jay Edw ard Oney, B.A., M.A. -
D. M. Rosenberg MILTON, DRYDEN, and the IDEOLOGY of GENRE
D. M. Rosenberg MILTON, DRYDEN, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF GENRE Samson Agonistes was Milton's creative response to the political and social forces that shaped the values of the Restoration theatre. These forces included the domination of Crown and Court, the ideological predilections and beliefs of the courtier playwrights and their coterie audience, and prevalent literary taste and stage practices. The rhymed heroic play, especially as it was developed by John Dryden, poet laureate and royal historiographer, most clearly exemplifies the varied social and theatrical elements that constitute the ethos and ideology of early Restoration drama. •*- Samson Agonistes as a poetic drama resembles the Restoration heroic play, particularly with regard to heroic themes and neoclassical canons of style. More significantly, however, Milton uses the heroic play as a genre to dissent from its conventions and shared norms. Samson Agonistes, in other words, relates to the heroic play by antagonism and reformation.^ This study will compare the characteristic qualities of two kinds of poetic drama, analysing their common and distinctive modes in order to under stand better Milton1s work in his dissenting, antagonistic relation to the ideology of the Restoration theatre. This comparison affords a perspective on the serious drama of the early Restoration. Further, by setting these plays together, one can define their meaning more closely than is possible in isola tion. Finally, comparison is a method that clarifies the ways in which Samson Agonistes was unique in its own time. In his preface to Samson Agonistes, published eleven years after the return of Charles II and the re-opening of the London theatres, Milton declared that his play "never was intended for the stage." This in itself is a significant part of the meaning of Samson Agonistes in the context of Restoration culture. -
Theatre Survey Albion's “Chaste Lucrece”
Theatre Survey http://journals.cambridge.org/TSY Additional services for Theatre Survey: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Albion's “Chaste Lucrece”: Chastity, Resistance, and the Glorious Revolution in the Career of Anne Bracegirdle James Peck Theatre Survey / Volume null / Issue 01 / May 2004, pp 89 - 113 DOI: 10.1017/S0040557404000079, Published online: 01 May 2004 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0040557404000079 How to cite this article: James Peck (2004). Albion's “Chaste Lucrece”: Chastity, Resistance, and the Glorious Revolution in the Career of Anne Bracegirdle. Theatre Survey, null, pp 89-113 doi:10.1017/S0040557404000079 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/TSY, IP address: 192.104.181.248 on 21 Nov 2014 Theatre Survey 45:1 (May 2004) James Peck ALBION’S “CHASTE LUCRECE”: CHASTITY, RESISTANCE,AND THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION IN THE CAREER OF ANNE BRACEGIRDLE By all indications, the public persona of the late Restoration actress Anne Bracegirdle was built on the speculative foundation of maidenhead. A leading ingénue of multiple talents, Bracegirdle played significant roles in comedy, tragedy, and music-drama from her debut in 1688 to her retirement in 1707. In comedy, Bracegirdle specialized in marriageable young women of rank, wit, and fortune.1 In serious drama, Bracegirdle often played the pathetic heroine, a virtuous woman stalked by a predatory man.2 Though primarily an actress, Bracegirdle also called upon her impressive soprano voice in many entr’actes and the occasional musical part.3 A first-rank player and hardworking company member from very early in her career, Bracegirdle played some eighty roles over a nineteen-year span that kept her consistently before the public eye. -
PURCELL COLLECTION Opera, Albion and Albanius, Which Was Set to Music EXTENSIVE LINER NOTES by the Spanish Composer Luis Grabu and Performed in 1685
PURCELL COLLECTION opera, Albion and Albanius, which was set to music EXTENSIVE LINER NOTES by the Spanish composer Luis Grabu and performed in 1685. Six years later, after the Glorious Revolution had stripped Dryden of the CD1+2 Laureateship, and poverty had forced him once ‘King Arthur’: Purcell’s Music and Dryden’s Play again to write for the public stage, he dusted off John Dryden called King Arthur ‘A dramatick the old play, altered its original political message, opera’, a proud and idiosyncratic subtitle which and sent it to Purcell, whose music he had come to has caused much confusion. It has been said admire, especially the brilliantly successful semi‐ unfairly that this work is neither dramatic nor an opera Dioclesian (1690). opera. To be sure it is not like a real opera, nor could it be easily turned into one. King Arthur is How much revision the play required is unknown, very much a play, a tragi‐comedy which happens to since the original version does not survive, but include some exceptionally fine music. During the Dryden implies major surgery: ‘… not to offend the Restoration, the term ‘opera’ was used to describe present Times, nor a Government which has any stage work with elaborate scenic effects, and hitherto protected me, I have been oblig’d…to did not necessarily mean an all‐sung music drama. alter the first Design, and take away so many The original 1691 production of King Arthur, Beauties from the Writing’. Besides trimming for though it included flying chariots and trap‐door political reasons, he also had to satisfy his new effects, was modest compared to other similar collaborator: ‘the Numbers of Poetry and Vocal works. -
Actes Des Congrès De La Société Française Shakespeare
Actes des congrès de la Société française Shakespeare 39 | 2021 Shakespeare et les acteurs Performing Genre: Tragic Curtains, Tragic Walking and Tragic Speaking Tiffany Stern Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/shakespeare/5904 DOI: 10.4000/shakespeare.5904 ISSN: 2271-6424 Publisher Société Française Shakespeare Electronic reference Tiffany Stern, “Performing Genre: Tragic Curtains, Tragic Walking and Tragic Speaking”, Actes des congrès de la Société française Shakespeare [Online], 39 | 2021, Online since 19 May 2021, connection on 23 August 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/shakespeare/5904 ; DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4000/shakespeare.5904 This text was automatically generated on 23 August 2021. © SFS Performing Genre: Tragic Curtains, Tragic Walking and Tragic Speaking 1 Performing Genre: Tragic Curtains, Tragic Walking and Tragic Speaking Tiffany Stern 1 In his New World of English Words, Edward Phillips characterises a “Tragedian” as “a writer of […] a sort of Dramatick Poetry […] representing murthers, sad and mournfull actions.”1 He may be picking up on Florio’s New World of Words which had defined a “comedian” as, no surprise, a “writer of comedies.”2 Both seem, now, self-evident as definitions. But Shakespeare, who was, according to these classifications, both a tragedian and a comedian, used those same words in a different sense. When Rosencrantz lets Hamlet know that “the Tragedians of the City” (Hamlet, TLN 1375) have arrived, or when Cleopatra worries that “The quicke Comedians / Extemporally will -
Mthaniel Lee «S Ri7al Queens
MTHANIEL LEE «S RI7AL QUEENS: A STUDY OF DRAMATIC TASTE AND TECHNIQUE IN THE RESTORATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U niversity By NANCY ELOISE LE^S, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State U niversity 1957 Approved by: Department of English TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I INTRODUCTION.......... ......................................................................... 1 II ALEXANDI-R AS H E R O ................................................................... 13 III Tr^ RIVAL QUEENS AS T R A G E D Y .......................................... kS n Ç E RIVAL QUEENS ON THE BOARDS............................................ 86 V n&&^IIC]3FLm#K% OF THE RIVAL QUEENS . 128 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................... 158 XI CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In the annals of English drama, the period of the Restoration is labeled chiefly as the age of the comedy of manners, the witty, sophis ticated, amoral society comedy written primarily for the pleasure of the audience of nobility and gentry that attended the theatres duiring the reign of Charles II. Critical studies devoted to this genre have been numerous; the plays of Etherege, t^cherley, and Congreve, as w ell as those of their lesser contemporaries in this field, have been examined in d ivid u ally and c o lle c tiv e ly by scholars of several genera tions. Aesthetically, such attention seems justified. Restoration plays which have survived their age are, for the most part, ccmedies. Dryden’s All for Love is the only notable exception. The serious drama of the Restoration is just as representative of the age, notwithstanding its limitations as lasting literature; indeed, Allardyce Nicoll calls heroic tragedy "that most characteristic of all the Restoration theatrical species."^ Thus it cannot be ignored in any 1.