Duty Calls: Holkham 1914 to 1918
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Number of Soldiers That Joined the Army from Registered Address in Scotland for Financial Years 2014 to 2017
Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom Ref: FOI2017/10087/13/04/79464 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.army.mod.uk XXX XXXXXXXXXXX 5 December 2017 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Dear XXXXXX, Thank you for your email of 14 October in which you clarified your request of 6 October to the following : ‘In particular please clarify what you mean by ‘people from Scotland’. Are you seeking information regarding individuals who identify themselves as being Scottish regardless of where they live now, or people who currently have a Scottish address regardless of their background or country of origin? Please note that for the MOD Joint Personnel Administration, some of the nationality options an individual can record themselves as include ‘British’, ‘Scottish’ or ‘British Scottish’. I was mainly looking for those having joined the Army from a Scottish address as I’m looking at how many people located in Scotland join the Army. Further clarification is required concerning the second part of your request - please clarify if you want Corps and Infantry Regiment (In essence Cap badge) or Corps and Infantry totals. Please note that a proportion of those who joined the untrained strength in 2016 may still be in training. Yes please, looking for Cap Badge of entrants from Scotland should this information exist. Finally please confirm that you require the information for both parts of your request by Financial Years 2014, 2015 & 2016. Yes please, If the information exists for each year then I would be grateful for this. If this is significantly time consuming then 2016 would be sufficient.’ I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000. -
World War I: the War to End All Wars and the Birth of a Handicapped International Criminal Justice System
Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 30 Number 3 Summer Article 3 May 2020 World War I: The War to End All Wars and the Birth of a Handicapped International Criminal Justice System M. Cherif Bassiouni Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation M. Cherif Bassiouni, World War I: The War to End All Wars and the Birth of a Handicapped International Criminal Justice System, 30 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 244 (2002). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. WORLD WAR I: "THE WAR TO END ALL WARS"AND THE BIRTH OF A HANDICAPPED INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM M. CHERIF BASSIOUNI* "Strategy is a system of stop-gaps." -Moltke' INTRODUCTION The words of Von Moltke, Germany's well-known general, are an apt prelude to the strategy of justice pursued by the Allies after World War I. It was, indeed, a "system of stop-gaps." World War I, commonly referred to as the "Great War" and "the war to end all wars," took place between 1914 and 1918 and "was the first general war, involving all the Great Powers of the day, to be fought out in the modem, industrialized world."2 The trigger for the war was an incident that occurred in the volatile Balkans 3 on June 28, 1914, in which Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife were assassinated by Gavrilo Princip as they rode in a car in Sarajevo.4 The " Professor of Law, President, International Human Rights Law Institute, DePaul University College of Law; President, International Association of Penal Law; President, International Institute for Higher Studies in Criminal Sciences. -
Regimental Associations
Regimental Associations Organisation Website AGC Regimental Association www.rhqagc.com A&SH Regimental Association https://www.argylls.co.uk/regimental-family/regimental-association-3 Army Air Corps Association www.army.mod.uk/aviation/ Airborne Forces Security Fund No Website information held Army Physical Training Corps Assoc No Website information held The Black Watch Association www.theblackwatch.co.uk The Coldstream Guards Association www.rhqcoldmgds.co.uk Corps of Army Music Trust No Website information held Duke of Lancaster’ Regiment www.army.mod.uk/infantry/regiments/3477.aspx The Gordon Highlanders www.gordonhighlanders.com Grenadier Guards Association www.grengds.com Gurkha Brigade Association www.army.mod.uk/gurkhas/7544.aspx Gurkha Welfare Trust www.gwt.org.uk The Highlanders Association No Website information held Intelligence Corps Association www.army.mod.uk/intelligence/association/ Irish Guards Association No Website information held KOSB Association www.kosb.co.uk The King's Royal Hussars www.krh.org.uk The Life Guards Association No website – Contact [email protected]> The Blues And Royals Association No website. Contact through [email protected]> Home HQ the Household Cavalry No website. Contact [email protected] Household Cavalry Associations www.army.mod.uk/armoured/regiments/4622.aspx The Light Dragoons www.lightdragoons.org.uk 9th/12th Lancers www.delhispearman.org.uk The Mercian Regiment No Website information held Military Provost Staff Corps http://www.mpsca.org.uk -
The Importance of the War at Sea During WWI
The Importance of The War At Sea During WWI By: Taylor Pressdee, Anna Ward, Nathan Urquidi What Was the Impact of ‘The War at Sea’? ● Opened a new kind of warfare: Submarine Warfare ● Involved civilians as well as sailors and soldiers ● One of the major reasons that the United States joined the Allies ● Influenced major events during the war: Battle of Jutland, the naval blockade, submarine warfare and the sinking of the Lusitania Who Was Affected By The War at Sea? ● “Total War” ● War At Sea affected civilians as well as soldiers ● Ship Liners, and Coastal cities were in danger of attack ● Starvation was prevalent in specifically Germany because supply ships were being sunk Timeline May 31st 1916 September 1915 Battle of Jutland Germans stop using U-boats February 1st 1916 Germans begin using U-boats again May 7th 1916 Lusitania Sinks Battle of Jutland Battle of Jutland ● Fought on May 31st 1916 ● Only major battle fought at sea ● Fought by the Jutland Peninsula between England and Germany ● Two Admirals in charge of both fleets: Vice Admiral Reinhard Scheer (Left) and Admiral Sir John Jellicoe (Right) The Battle ● British forces intercepted a German message containing a plan to attack them on May 28th ● However, Admiral Scheer postponed the attack due to bad weather ○ Attempted to plan another attack down by the Jutland Peninsula, however Britain intercepted this plan as well ● Vice Admiral Jellicoe moved his fleet down to the Jutland Peninsula, awaiting the attack Aftermath of the Battle ● The British suffered losses, but not nearly -
Lieutenant Commander Hugh C J Mcrae
Lieutenant Commander Hugh C J McRae Hugh Charles James McRae was born on 29th November 1909, the only son of Sir Charles James Hugh McRea Kt JP and Lady Edith Sophia McRea (nee Farnie). He had one sister Marjorie. When growing-up the family home was in Hendon. Hugh joined Lord Williams's Grammar School in 1918, and then in 1926 joined the Royal Navy as an officer cadet at the training school HMS Worcester. He was appointed a Midshipman in 1927 and went on to serve on a number of ships. He married Frances Mary Mason in Hendon in 1935 and they set-up their family home at Airandene, Wise Lane, Mill Hill, Middlesex. However when Hugh was stationed in China in 1936, Frances moved there too, albeit having to sail on a commercial liner – the Perseus – that departed Liverpool in September 1936. A daughter Jean was born in Shanghai in 1937. After serving in China for two years, Hugh returned to the UK and joined the destroyer HMS Grafton in July 1938. The Grafton was assigned to the 1st Destroyer Flotilla in the Mediterranean Fleet and his wife and daughter set up home in Malta in January 1939. In June 1940, during the evacuation from Dunkirk, and after successfully rescuing 1600 troops, the Grafton was struck by a torpedo from U-62., with the captain and 14 others killed, the ship was too badly damaged to be towed to safety, and she was sunk by gunfire from HMS Ivanhoe. Lieutenant McRea was subsequently Mentioned in Despatches, and promoted to Lieutenant Commander, taking over command of the captured French torpedo boat Branlebas. -
Disposal Services Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2006-2007
Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 DisposalSMART 1 What is the Disposal Services Agency? The Disposal Services Agency (DSA) is the sole authority for the disposal process of all surplus defence equipment, with the exception of nuclear, land and buildings. The Agency targets potential markets particularly in developing countries in a pro-active manner; to enable them to procure formally used British defence equipment instead of equipment from other countries. The principal activity of the Agency is the provision of disposal and sales services to MoD and other parts of the public sector. These services include Government-to-Government Sales, Asset Realisation, Inventory Disposals, Site Clearances, Repayment Sales, Waste Management and Consultancy and Valuation Services. DSA’s Aim: To secure the best nancial return from the sale of surplus equipment and stores; to minimise the cost of sales and to operate as an intelligent contracting organisation with various agreements with British Industry and Commerce. DSA’s Mission: To provide Defence and other users with an agreed, effective and ef cient disposals and sales service in order to support UK Defence capability. DSA’s Vision: To be the best government Disposals organisation in the world. DisposalSMART Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 A Defence Agency of the Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2006-2007 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 23rd July 2007 HC 705 -
The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover. -
Fall K: German Offensive Plans Against the Netherlands
Chapter 4 W. Klinkert: Fall K. German Offensive Plans against the Netherlands 1916-1918 1 The Netherlands at the time of the First World War offers an inviting case-study of a small country’s freedom of movement in the close proximity of large, warring states. Important research into this has already been done, particularly in studies by Marc Frey1, Hubert van Tuyll2 and Maartje Abbenhuis3. They have made it clear, on the one hand, that the Entente and Central Powers had an interest in Dutch neutrality for economic as well as military reasons, and, on the other, that Dutch politicians, military leaders and entrepreneurs were in constant contact with those making government policy or those influencing it in the belligerent states, to defend Dutch interests and to steer a middle course between the contradictory and increasingly exacting demands of the warring states as the war progressed. The most powerful weapons the Netherlands could dispose of were of an economic nature and making it clear in word and deed that no party was favoured above the other. Any pretence of one of the belligerents to take preventive action against the Netherlands had to be taken away. Little has current research so far elaborated on the military interpretation of the Dutch policy of neutrality. Did the Dutch military effort– there were more than 200,000 troops at the ready for a period of four years – play any role of significance? Could the Dutch Government use this military element to make its policy of neutrality stronger and more credible? Did the Dutch army constitute a factor in the belligerents’ considerations concerning their policy towards the Netherlands? In other words, did the military effort of a small state really matter? To answer these questions, it may serve as a first step to have a closer look at German offensive plans, referred to as Fall K4 since October 1916, in relation with the matter of 1 M. -
The Semaphore Circular No 647 the Beating Heart of the RNA March 2015
The Semaphore Circular No 647 The Beating Heart of the RNA March 2015 Chrissie Hughes (Shipmates Administrator), Michelle Bainbridge (Financial Controller) and Life Vice President Rita Lock MBE offer sage instructions to AB Andy Linton and AB Jo Norcross at HQ after they were ‘Volunteered’ for supplementary duties with the RNA! Andy and Jo commented later it is a character building experience!! RNA members are reminded that hard-copies of the Circular are distributed to each branch via their Secretary, but “silver-surfers” can download their own copy from the RNA website at www.royal-naval-association.co.uk .(See below) Daily Orders 1. Welfare Seminar Update 2. IMC Sailing Camp 3. Gallipoli Event Whitehall 4. 75th Anniversary of Dunkirk Invitation 5. Guess Where? 6. Can anyone beat this Car Registration 7. Request for assistance 8. Finance Corner 9. Donations received 10. Free to a good home 11. Di from Llandrod Wells 12. Caption Competition 13. Can you assist 14. Spotters Corner 15. The Atheist and the Bear 16. Virtual Branch 17. RN VC Series – Captain Edward Unwin 18. Fifty Shades of Pussers Grey 19. Type 21 Memorial 20. Old Ships 21. HMS M33 Appeal 22. Down Memory Lane Longcast “D’ye hear there” (Branch news) Ship’s Office 1. Swinging the Lamp For the Branch Secretary and notice-board Glossary of terms NCM National Council Member NC National Council AMC Association Management Committee FAC Finance Administration Committee NCh National Chairman NVCh National Vice Chairman NP National President DNP Deputy National President GS General -
Wider. Bigger. Greater
WIDER. BIGGER. GREATER. Neo-Palladian Country Houses as Representations of Power Struggle, Globalization and “Britishness” in the United Kingdom of the 1750s Stefanie Leitner s1782088 - [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. J.G. Roding Second reader: Dr. E. den Hartog MA Arts and Culture 2016/2017 Specialization: Architecture TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Theoretical Framework ......................................................................... 2 1.2. Literature Review ................................................................................. 4 2. Node I – Architecture .................................................................................. 8 2.1. General developments compared to the 1720s .................................... 8 2.2. Introduction of the Case Studies .......................................................... 9 2.2.1. Holkham Hall (1734-1764) ........................................................... 11 2.2.2. Hagley Hall (1754-1760)............................................................... 20 2.2.3. Kedleston Hall (1759) ................................................................... 28 3. Node II – Globalization ............................................................................. 38 3.1. Colonization and the British Empire ................................................. 38 3.2. Connection with continental Europe .................................................. 39 3.3. -
The Lookout Our New Visitor Facility on the Holkham National Nature Reserve First Words
Holkham Gazette Issue 28 Autumn 2018 The Lookout Our new visitor facility on the Holkham National Nature Reserve First words Caring for the Holkham collection Maria de Peverelli is executive chairman of Stonehage Fleming Art Management, serving a client base that includes The Lookout, the new facility on Lady individuals, family offices, foundations, Anne’s Drive on the Holkham trusts and estates. She has recently taken up National Nature Reserve, is well the role of consultant on the collection at worth a visit. The interesting, very Holkham where she will oversee the informative and interactive conservation and preservation, and educational boards and media screens supervise the loan, of items from Holkham’s reward those who take time to study world-famous collection to other art them, offering new insights as to how galleries and museums around the world. the reserve’s precious and precarious Maria is also a Trustee of the Yorkshire landscape is managed and what Sculpture Park and of the Estorick visitors can do to help. Its exciting Collection and serves as a member of the design seems destined for board of Advisers of the Fondazione Palazzo commendation by architects from Strozzi, Florence. She established OmniArt in 2005 and prior to that, Maria was around the country and the ‘green’ gallery director of the Villa Favorita in Lugano (Thyssen-Bornemisza message is very thoughtfully and collection). She has organised exhibitions for the Museum of Applied Arts in effectively conveyed. All that and Frankfurt and taught museum management at the University of Genoa. lavatories too – go and see! Sara Phillips, Editor Contents First words ........................................................ -
Islamic Gunpowder Empires : Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals / Douglas E
“Douglas Streusand has contributed a masterful comparative analysis and an up-to- S date reinterpretation of the significance of the early modern Islamic empires. This T book makes profound scholarly insights readily accessible to undergraduate stu- R dents and will be useful in world history surveys as well as more advanced courses.” —Hope Benne, Salem State College E U “Streusand creatively reexamines the military and political history and structures of the SAN Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires. He breaks down the process of transformation and makes their divergent outcomes comprehensible, not only to an audience of special- ists, but also to undergraduates and general readers. Appropriate for courses in world, early modern, or Middle Eastern history as well as the political sociology of empires.” D —Linda T. Darling, University of Arizona “Streusand is to be commended for navigating these hearty and substantial historiogra- phies to pull together an analytical textbook which will be both informative and thought provoking for the undergraduate university audience.” GUNPOWDER EMPIRES —Colin Mitchell, Dalhousie University Islamic Gunpowder Empires provides an illuminating history of Islamic civilization in the early modern world through a comparative examination of Islam’s three greatest empires: the Otto- IS mans (centered in what is now Turkey), the Safavids (in modern Iran), and the Mughals (ruling the Indian subcontinent). Author Douglas Streusand explains the origins of the three empires; compares the ideological, institutional, military, and economic contributors to their success; and L analyzes the causes of their rise, expansion, and ultimate transformation and decline. Streusand depicts the three empires as a part of an integrated international system extending from the At- lantic to the Straits of Malacca, emphasizing both the connections and the conflicts within that AMIC system.