DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of Deep-Sea Benthic Biodiversity Associated with Trench, Canyon and Abyssal Habitats Below 1500 M Depth in New Zealand Waters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of Deep-Sea Benthic Biodiversity Associated with Trench, Canyon and Abyssal Habitats Below 1500 M Depth in New Zealand Waters A review of deep-sea benthic biodiversity associated with trench, canyon and abyssal habitats below 1500 m depth in New Zealand waters A.N. Lörz ¹ K. Berkenbusch² S. Nodder¹ S. Ahyong3 D. Bowden¹ P. McMillan¹ D. Gordon¹ S. Mills¹ K. Mackay¹ ¹ NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington. ² Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin. 3 Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 92 2012 Published by Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Wellington 2012 ISBN 978-0-478-38782-7 (Online) ISSN 1176-9440 (Print) ISSN 1179-6480 (Online) © Crown Copyright, 2012 - Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Lörz, A.N.; Berkenbusch, K.; Nodder, S.; Ahyong, S.; Bowden, D.; McMillan, P.; Gordon, D.; Mills, S.; Mackay, K. (2012) A review of deep-sea benthic biodiversity associated with trench, canyon and abyssal habitats below 1500 m depth in New Zealand waters. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No 92. 133 p. This series continues the Marine Biodiversity Biosecurity Report series which ceased with No. 7 in February 2005. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry P O Box 2526 WELLINGTON Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry of Fisheries website at http://fs.fish.govt.nz go to Document library/Research reports or the MAF website at: http://www.maf.govt.nz/news-resources/publications.aspx. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lörz, A.N.; Berkenbusch, K.; Nodder, S.; Ahyong, S.; Bowden, D.; McMillan, P.; Gordon, D.; Mills, S.; Mackay, K. (2012). A review of deep-sea benthic biodiversity associated with trench, canyon and abyssal habitats below 1500 m depth in New Zealand waters. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No 92. 133p. We review the state of knowledge of benthic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in deep-sea abyssal, canyon and trench habitats in the New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone and the Ross Dependency, and make recommendations for future deep-sea research in depths exceeding 1500 m. All biological information in scientific papers and reports from New Zealand below 1500 m was reviewed and an exhaustive search of multiple data sources was conducted. The area of the deep seafloor below 1500 m covers more than 65% of New Zealand’s Exclusive Economic Zone. A total of 1489 benthic gear deployments have been conducted by New Zealand- based sampling initiatives since 1955, most of which were focused on obtaining geological samples. Less than 0.002 % of New Zealand’s deep-sea environment (i.e. in terms of seabed area) below 1500 m has been sampled. All taxonomy-based studies of all taxa reported in New Zealand waters below 1500 m have been reviewed. To date, 8 species of Bacteria, 293 species of Protozoa, 785 species of invertebrates, and 56 fish species have been recorded from water depths greater than 1500 m. Most of these species are known only from single or relatively few stations collected mainly during historical, non-New Zealand sampling initiatives, notably the British Challenger, Danish Galathea or Russian Vityaz expeditions. Many of these specimens are held at the associated institutions in London, Copenhagen and Moscow, and are therefore not immediately available for scientific study in New Zealand. Few ecological studies in New Zealand waters have focused on assemblage patterns or processes at depths exceeding 1500 m. Of these, most have been on the Chatham Rise and surrounding areas, with sampling conducted across a wide depth range (from shallow to deep-sea sediments), sometimes as part of interdisciplinary research of particular ecosystem processes. Ecological information on benthic fauna and demersal fish from depths below 1500 m is restricted to the Kermadec Trench. Process- orientated studies are limited to pelagic-benthic coupling (and ocean productivity) research on the Chatham Rise slopes, and trophic interactions research in hadal environments (below 6000 m) of the Kermadec Trench. The scarcity of information from New Zealand is particularly evident when compared with other regions worldwide, for which detailed descriptions of invertebrate and fish assemblages exist, and where the availability of long-term and experimental data has enabled the elucidation of deep-sea ecosystem processes. More than 8000 images are known to have been taken of the seafloor below 1500 m in the New Zealand region, covering an area of approximately 0.016 km2. Over 4000 of the images held at NIWA exist either as paper prints or negatives and ideally should be digitised for future storage and access for analyses. Analysis of these photographic images should yield considerable information about deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem function in the New Zealand region and could be used to answer a number of research questions (especially around deep-sea benthic biodiversity). Recommendations on how to potentially further analyse existing data from images, databases and actual specimens are provided. The technical challenges, including gear requirements to sample deep- sea New Zealand benthos and potential future investments, are summarised. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Review of Deep Sea Benthic Biodiversity • 3 Recent research in the Southern Ocean highlights the ecological and evolutionary importance of the southeastern Pacific Ocean. There are clearly many research questions about benthic ecosystems in New Zealand waters below 1500 m depth that if addressed could increase knowledge to levels similar to those in other regions of the globe. This would require expanding New Zealand’s deep-sea sampling capabilities and developing a long-term, integrated research programme, potentially in collaboration with overseas research institutions. 1. INTRODUCTION The objective of the review is to assess the state of knowledge of biodiversity and ecosystem function in New Zealand deep-sea abyssal, canyon and trench habitats, and make recommendations for future research, under Ministry of Fisheries (MFish) project ZBD2008-27. 1.1 Rationale and aims of the review Seventy-one percent of the Earth's surface is covered by oceans. Of this, 87% of the ocean's surface and 90% of the ocean's volume is covered by water deeper than 1500 m. Habitats such as abyssal plains, deep-sea canyons, seamounts, channels and trenches that occur at depths below 1500 m occupy approximately 65% of New Zealand’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), distributed in three depth zones — bathyal (down to 3000 m), abyssal (3000–6000 m) and hadal (below 6000 m). Little is known, however, about benthic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in these zones in New Zealand, or how these are linked to more productive surface waters. The ecological and evolutionary relationships between deep-sea benthic biodiversity in New Zealand and other similar habitats around the world are also unknown. The tectonic setting of New Zealand astride the boundary between the Pacific and Australian crustal plates provides a “natural laboratory” for studying such bathymetrically complex environments. The rationale for the upper depth limit of 1500 m in the present review builds on the preliminary review of New Zealand’s deep-water benthic biodiversity prepared by Key (2002), and relates to the current depth limit of fishing. 1500 m is the maximal depth coverage by biodiversity projects under the regional Ocean Survey 20/20 (OS2020) mapping programme, administered by Land Information New Zealand (LINZ). The present review also includes habitats such as slope, troughs, plateaux and seamounts where they occur below 1500 m water depth. For the purposes of this review, the “New Zealand region” is bounded by latitudes 24° S to 57°30’ S and longitudes 157° E to 167° W. While the primary focus of the present review is abyssal environments within the New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), we have included the Ross Sea as this is an area where New Zealand has responsibilities to the Comission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Data from three primary sources were collated and summarised for the present review: 1) Scientific papers and reports: all published accounts of studies below 1500 m depth in the New Zealand region and the Ross Dependency, including peer-reviewed scientific literature, faunal monographs and technical reports. 2) Databases and collections: emphasis was made on data held by two nationally funded collections that contain most deep-water fauna samples collected historically in New Zealand waters. These samples are housed within NIWA’s Invertebrate Collection (NIC), a core funded (ex FRST- funded) ‘nationally significant’ collection of marine invertebrates, and the National Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, funded by the Ministry of Culture and including deep-water invertebrates and fishes. Other relevant databases (e.g., Specify, Trawl) were also interrogated and relevant metadata collated. 3) Image collections: comprising all photographs of the seabed greater than 1500 m depth in the New Zealand region. These were taken mostly by NIWA or its predecessor organisation (the New 4 • Review of Deep Sea Benthic Biodiversity Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Zealand Oceanographic Institute of the DSIR), with a small number by foreign vessels. All are available to NIWA but many have not yet been formally databased. 1.2 Specific Objectives Specific Objective 1 To assess the state of knowledge of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in New Zealand deep-sea abyssal, canyon and trench habitats and make recommendations for future research. 1.3 Physical, geographical, and chemical description of the habitat being reviewed The physiography of environments below 1500 m in the New Zealand region is varied and complex (Figure 1), reflecting tectonic evolution of the largely submerged ‘Zealandia’ subcontinent over the last 80 million years (Kamp 1986; Sutherland 1995, 1999a, b; King 2000a, b; Campbell & Hutching 2007; Wood & Stagpoole 2007). In particular, this tectonic activity has been dominated by the development of an active plate boundary between the Pacific and Australian plates since 25 million years ago.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Note
    THE NAUTILUS 130(3):132–133, 2016 Page 132 Research Note A tumbling snail (Gastropoda: The width of the shell, based on the camera’s scale dots, Vetigastropoda: Margaritidae) seems to have been close to 40 mm, with the extended foot as much as 100 mm. The characteristic covered In August 2015, the NOAA ship OKEANOS EXPLORER con- umbilicus can only partially be seen in the photograph, ducted deep-sea studies in the northwestern Hawaiian so the identification remains uncertain. Hickman (2012) Islands, which now are within the Papahanaumokuakea noted that species of Gaza from the Gulf of Mexico Marine National Monument. The ship deployed the might be associated with chemosynthetic communi- remotely operated vehicle DEEP DISCOVERER (D2 ROV), ties, but the mollusk in the photographs was living on whose live video feed was shared with researchers on manganese-encrusted basalt. shore via satellite transmission. Hickman (2003; 2007) reported “foot thrashing” as an On 5 August 2015, the D2 ROV was exploring angular escape response to predators and in the laboratory by basalt blocks and sediment patches on the steep inner “mechanical disturbance” in the trochoidean gastropods slope of Maro Crater, an unusual 6 km-wide crater east Umbonium vestiarium (Linnaeus, 1758), Isanda coronata of Maro Reef (25.16o N, 169.88o W, 2998–3027 m). The A. Adams, 1854, and other species of the family cameras recorded what appeared to be a fish attacking or Solariellidae. The observations provided here are the first being attacked by some other unidentified animal. When of such behavior in Gaza spp. and among the few reports the ROV cameras were zoomed in on the encounter, the on behavior of non-cephalopod deep-sea mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    OPHIDIIFORMES (part 2) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 9.0 - 24 Aug. 2020 Order OPHIDIIFORMES (part 2 of 2) Suborder BYTHITOIDEI Family BYTHITIDAE Viviparous (or Livebearing) Brotulas 34 genera · 125 species · Taxonomic note: includes taxa sometimes placed in Aphyonidae. Acarobythites Machida 2000 acaro, small, referring to its small size (up to 25.2 mm SL); Bythites, type genus of family Acarobythites larsonae Machida 2000 in honor of Helen Larson, Curator of Fishes, Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory (Darwin, Australia), who kindly sent bythitid and ophidiid specimens to Machida for study Anacanthobythites Anderson 2008 an-, not and acanthus, thorn or prickle, referring to lack of developed gill rakers on first branchial arch; Bythites, type genus of family Anacanthobythites platycephalus Anderson 2008 platys, broad; cephalus, head, referring to its depressed head Anacanthobythites tasmaniensis Anderson 2008 -ensis, suffix denoting place: Tasmania, Australia, type locality Aphyonus Günther 1878 aphya, anchovy or small, translucent fish, referring to its transparent, colorless skin; onus, presumably a latinization of onos, a name dating to Aristotle, originally referring to Phycis blennoides (Gadiformes: Gadidae) but often mistakenly applied to Merluccius merluccius (Gadiformes: Merlucciidae) and hence used several times by Günther as a suffix for a hake-like fish Aphyonus gelatinosus Günther 1878 gelatinous or jelly-like, referring to “thin, scaleless, loose” skin, forming
    [Show full text]
  • A New Computing Environment for Modeling Species Distribution
    EXPLORATORY RESEARCH RECOGNIZED WORLDWIDE Botany, ecology, zoology, plant and animal genetics. In these and other sub-areas of Biological Sciences, Brazilian scientists contributed with results recognized worldwide. FAPESP,São Paulo Research Foundation, is one of the main Brazilian agencies for the promotion of research.The foundation supports the training of human resources and the consolidation and expansion of research in the state of São Paulo. Thematic Projects are research projects that aim at world class results, usually gathering multidisciplinary teams around a major theme. Because of their exploratory nature, the projects can have a duration of up to five years. SCIENTIFIC OPPORTUNITIES IN SÃO PAULO,BRAZIL Brazil is one of the four main emerging nations. More than ten thousand doctorate level scientists are formed yearly and the country ranks 13th in the number of scientific papers published. The State of São Paulo, with 40 million people and 34% of Brazil’s GNP responds for 52% of the science created in Brazil.The state hosts important universities like the University of São Paulo (USP) and the State University of Campinas (Unicamp), the growing São Paulo State University (UNESP), Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Federal University of ABC (ABC is a metropolitan region in São Paulo), Federal University of São Carlos, the Aeronautics Technology Institute (ITA) and the National Space Research Institute (INPE). Universities in the state of São Paulo have strong graduate programs: the University of São Paulo forms two thousand doctorates every year, the State University of Campinas forms eight hundred and the University of the State of São Paulo six hundred.
    [Show full text]
  • Cusk Eels, Brotulas [=Cherublemma Trotter [E
    FAMILY Ophidiidae Rafinesque, 1810 - cusk eels SUBFAMILY Ophidiinae Rafinesque, 1810 - cusk eels [=Ofidini, Otophidioidei, Lepophidiinae, Genypterinae] Notes: Ofidini Rafinesque, 1810b:38 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Ophidion [as Ophidium; latinized to Ophididae by Bonaparte 1831:162, 184 [ref. 4978] (family); stem corrected to Ophidi- by Lowe 1843:92 [ref. 2832], confirmed by Günther 1862a:317, 370 [ref. 1969], by Gill 1872:3 [ref. 26254] and by Carus 1893:578 [ref. 17975]; considered valid with this authorship by Gill 1893b:136 [ref. 26255], by Goode & Bean 1896:345 [ref. 1848], by Nolf 1985:64 [ref. 32698], by Patterson 1993:636 [ref. 32940] and by Sheiko 2013:63 [ref. 32944] Article 11.7.2; family name sometimes seen as Ophidionidae] Otophidioidei Garman, 1899:390 [ref. 1540] (no family-group name) Lepophidiinae Robins, 1961:218 [ref. 3785] (subfamily) Lepophidium Genypterinae Lea, 1980 (subfamily) Genypterus [in unpublished dissertation: Systematics and zoogeography of cusk-eels of the family Ophidiidae, subfamily Ophidiinae, from the eastern Pacific Ocean, University of Miami, not available] GENUS Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 - cusk eels, brotulas [=Cherublemma Trotter [E. S.], 1926:119, Brotuloides Robins [C. R.], 1961:214] Notes: [ref. 4466]. Neut. Cherublemma lelepris Trotter, 1926. Type by monotypy. •Valid as Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 -- (Pequeño 1989:48 [ref. 14125], Robins in Nielsen et al. 1999:27, 28 [ref. 24448], Castellanos-Galindo et al. 2006:205 [ref. 28944]). Current status: Valid as Cherublemma Trotter, 1926. Ophidiidae: Ophidiinae. (Brotuloides) [ref. 3785]. Masc. Leptophidium emmelas Gilbert, 1890. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Synonym of Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 -- (Castro-Aguirre et al. 1993:80 [ref. 21807] based on placement of type species, Robins in Nielsen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes of the Azores: an Annotated Checklist and Bibliography
    MARINE FISHES OF THE AZORES: AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND BIBLIOGRAPHY. RICARDO SERRÃO SANTOS, FILIPE MORA PORTEIRO & JOÃO PEDRO BARREIROS SANTOS, RICARDO SERRÃO, FILIPE MORA PORTEIRO & JOÃO PEDRO BARREIROS 1997. Marine fishes of the Azores: An annotated checklist and bibliography. Arquipélago. Life and Marine Sciences Supplement 1: xxiii + 242pp. Ponta Delgada. ISSN 0873-4704. ISBN 972-9340-92-7. A list of the marine fishes of the Azores is presented. The list is based on a review of the literature combined with an examination of selected specimens available from collections of Azorean fishes deposited in museums, including the collection of fish at the Department of Oceanography and Fisheries of the University of the Azores (Horta). Personal information collected over several years is also incorporated. The geographic area considered is the Economic Exclusive Zone of the Azores. The list is organised in Classes, Orders and Families according to Nelson (1994). The scientific names are, for the most part, those used in Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (FNAM) (Whitehead et al. 1989), and they are organised in alphabetical order within the families. Clofnam numbers (see Hureau & Monod 1979) are included for reference. Information is given if the species is not cited for the Azores in FNAM. Whenever available, vernacular names are presented, both in Portuguese (Azorean names) and in English. Synonyms, misspellings and misidentifications found in the literature in reference to the occurrence of species in the Azores are also quoted. The 460 species listed, belong to 142 families; 12 species are cited for the first time for the Azores.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Deep-Sea Scavengers to Ocean Acidification and the Odor from a Dead Grenadier
    Vol. 350: 193–207, 2007 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published November 22 doi: 10.3354/meps07188 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Response of deep-sea scavengers to ocean acidification and the odor from a dead grenadier James P. Barry1,*, Jeffrey C. Drazen2 1Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholdt Road, Moss Landing, California 95039, USA 2University of Hawaii, Department of Oceanography, MSB 606, 1000 Pope Rd, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA ABSTRACT: Experiments to assess the impact of ocean acidification on abyssal animals were per- formed off Central California. The survival of caged megafauna (Benthoctopus sp., Pachycara bulbi- ceps, Coryphaenoides armatus) exposed to CO2-rich and normal (control) seawater varied among species. Benthoctopus sp. and P. bulbiceps survived control conditions and month-long episodic exposure to acidic, CO2-rich waters (pH reductions of ~0.1 U). All C. armatus in both treatments died, potentially due to cage-related stress, predation, and exposure to acidic waters. High survival by P. bulbiceps and Benthoctopus under month-long exposure to CO2-rich waters indicates a physiologi- cal capacity to cope, at least temporarily, with stresses that will accompany expected future changes in ocean chemistry. The abundance of free-ranging scavengers was not correlated with variation in pH levels near fish cages. Incidental observations of abyssal scavengers collected using time-lapse cameras during these experiments were used secondarily to evaluate the hypothesis that macrourid fishes avoid the odor of dead conspecifics. Caged macrourids in view of time-lapse cameras died within 2 to 3 d, eliciting a strong response from the regional scavenger assemblage which aggregated near the cage.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversidad De Los Equinodermos (Echinodermata) Del Mar Profundo Mexicano
    Biodiversidad de los equinodermos (Echinodermata) del mar profundo mexicano Francisco A. Solís-Marín,1 A. Laguarda-Figueras,1 A. Durán González,1 A.R. Vázquez-Bader,2 Adolfo Gracia2 Resumen Nuestro conocimiento de la diversidad del mar profundo en aguas mexicanas se limita a los escasos estudios existentes. El número de especies descritas es incipiente y los registros taxonómicos que existen provienen sobre todo de estudios realizados por ex- tranjeros y muy pocos por investigadores mexicanos, con los cuales es posible conjuntar algunas listas faunísticas. Es importante dar a conocer lo que se sabe hasta el momen- to sobre los equinodermos de las zonas profundas de México, información básica para diversos sectores en nuestro país, tales como los tomadores de decisiones y científicos interesados en el tema. México posee hasta el momento 643 especies de equinoder- mos reportadas en sus aguas territoriales, aproximadamente el 10% del total de las especies reportadas en todo el planeta (~7,000). Según los registros de la Colección Nacional de Equinodermos (ICML, UNAM), la Colección de Equinodermos del “Natural History Museum, Smithsonian Institution”, Washington, DC., EUA y la bibliografía revisa- 1 Colección Nacional de Equinodermos “Ma. E. Caso Muñoz”, Laboratorio de Sistemá- tica y Ecología de Equinodermos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (ICML), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Apdo. Post. 70-305, México, D. F. 04510, México. 2 Laboratorio de Ecología Pesquera de Crustáceos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Lim- nología (ICML), (UNAM), Apdo. Postal 70-305, México D. F., 04510, México. 215 da, existen 348 especies de equinodermos que habitan las aguas profundas mexicanas (≥ 200 m) lo que corresponde al 54.4% del total de las especies reportadas para el país.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an Updated Checklist
    1 2 Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist 3 4 5 RAFAEL BAÑON1, DAVID VILLEGAS-RÍOS2, ALBERTO SERRANO3, 6 GONZALO MUCIENTES2,4 & JUAN CARLOS ARRONTE3 7 8 9 10 1 Servizo de Planificación, Dirección Xeral de Recursos Mariños, Consellería de Pesca 11 e Asuntos Marítimos, Rúa do Valiño 63-65, 15703 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E- 12 mail: [email protected] 13 2 CSIC. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas. Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo 14 (Pontevedra), Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (D. V-R); [email protected] 15 (G.M.). 16 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. de Santander, Santander, Spain. E-mail: 17 [email protected] (A.S); [email protected] (J.-C. A). 18 4Centro Tecnológico del Mar, CETMAR. Eduardo Cabello s.n., 36208. Vigo 19 (Pontevedra), Spain. 20 21 Abstract 22 23 An annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Galician waters is presented. The list 24 is based on historical literature records and new revisions. The ichthyofauna list is 25 composed by 397 species very diversified in 2 superclass, 3 class, 35 orders, 139 1 1 families and 288 genus. The order Perciformes is the most diverse one with 37 families, 2 91 genus and 135 species. Gobiidae (19 species) and Sparidae (19 species) are the 3 richest families. Biogeographically, the Lusitanian group includes 203 species (51.1%), 4 followed by 149 species of the Atlantic (37.5%), then 28 of the Boreal (7.1%), and 17 5 of the African (4.3%) groups. We have recognized 41 new records, and 3 other records 6 have been identified as doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • The Absence of Sharks from Abyssal Regions of the World's Oceans
    Proc. R. Soc. B (2006) 273, 1435–1441 doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3461 Published online 21 February 2006 The absence of sharks from abyssal regions of the world’s oceans Imants G. Priede1,*, Rainer Froese2, David M. Bailey3, Odd Aksel Bergstad4, Martin A. Collins5, Jan Erik Dyb6, Camila Henriques1, Emma G. Jones7 and Nicola King1 1University of Aberdeen, Oceanlab, Newburgh, Aberdeen AB41 6AA, UK 2Leibniz-Institut fu¨r Meereswissenschaften, IfM-GEOMAR, Du¨sternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany 3Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0202, USA 4Institute of Marine Research, Flødevigen Marine Research Station, 4817 His, Norway 5British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 6Møre Research, Section of Fisheries, PO Box 5075, 6021 Aalesund, Norway 7FRS Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB11 9DB, UK The oceanic abyss (depths greater than 3000 m), one of the largest environments on the planet, is characterized by absence of solar light, high pressures and remoteness from surface food supply necessitating special molecular, physiological, behavioural and ecological adaptations of organisms that live there. Sampling by trawl, baited hooks and cameras we show that the Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays and chimaeras) are absent from, or very rare in this region. Analysis of a global data set shows a trend of rapid disappearance of chondrichthyan species with depth when compared with bony fishes. Sharks, apparently well adapted to life at high pressures are conspicuous on slopes down to 2000 m including scavenging at food falls such as dead whales.
    [Show full text]
  • CNIDARIA Corals, Medusae, Hydroids, Myxozoans
    FOUR Phylum CNIDARIA corals, medusae, hydroids, myxozoans STEPHEN D. CAIRNS, LISA-ANN GERSHWIN, FRED J. BROOK, PHILIP PUGH, ELLIOT W. Dawson, OscaR OcaÑA V., WILLEM VERvooRT, GARY WILLIAMS, JEANETTE E. Watson, DENNIS M. OPREsko, PETER SCHUCHERT, P. MICHAEL HINE, DENNIS P. GORDON, HAMISH J. CAMPBELL, ANTHONY J. WRIGHT, JUAN A. SÁNCHEZ, DAPHNE G. FAUTIN his ancient phylum of mostly marine organisms is best known for its contribution to geomorphological features, forming thousands of square Tkilometres of coral reefs in warm tropical waters. Their fossil remains contribute to some limestones. Cnidarians are also significant components of the plankton, where large medusae – popularly called jellyfish – and colonial forms like Portuguese man-of-war and stringy siphonophores prey on other organisms including small fish. Some of these species are justly feared by humans for their stings, which in some cases can be fatal. Certainly, most New Zealanders will have encountered cnidarians when rambling along beaches and fossicking in rock pools where sea anemones and diminutive bushy hydroids abound. In New Zealand’s fiords and in deeper water on seamounts, black corals and branching gorgonians can form veritable trees five metres high or more. In contrast, inland inhabitants of continental landmasses who have never, or rarely, seen an ocean or visited a seashore can hardly be impressed with the Cnidaria as a phylum – freshwater cnidarians are relatively few, restricted to tiny hydras, the branching hydroid Cordylophora, and rare medusae. Worldwide, there are about 10,000 described species, with perhaps half as many again undescribed. All cnidarians have nettle cells known as nematocysts (or cnidae – from the Greek, knide, a nettle), extraordinarily complex structures that are effectively invaginated coiled tubes within a cell.
    [Show full text]