The Medvedev Thaw: Is It Real? Will It Last?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Medvedev Thaw: Is It Real? Will It Last? THE MEDVEDEV THAW: IS IT REAL? WILL IT LAST? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 23, 2009 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 111–1–4] ( Available via http://www.csce.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 75–512 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:23 Sep 18, 2012 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\WORK\062309.TXT KATIE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida, BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland, Co-Chairman Chairman EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER, SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island New York TOM UDALL, New Mexico MIKE McINTYRE, North Carolina JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama RICHARD BURR, North Carolina JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania ROBERT F. WICKER, Mississippi DARRELL E. ISSA, California EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS VACANT, Department of State VACANT, Department of Defense ALEXANDER VERSHBOW, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:23 Sep 18, 2012 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 U:\WORK\062309.TXT KATIE THE MEDVEDEV THAW: IS IT REAL? WILL IT LAST? JUNE 23, 2009 COMMISSIONERS Page Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin, Chairman, Commission on Secu- rity and Cooperation in Europe .............................................. 1 Hon. Darrell E. Issa, Commissioner, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ..................................................... 16 WITNESSES Sergey Cherepanov, Russia Coordinator, Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania ......................................... 3 Musa Klebnikov, Executive Director, The Paul Klebnikov Fund ......................................................................................... 6 William Browder, Chief Executive Officer, Hermitage Capital Management Limited .............................................................. 9 Sarah E. Mendelson, Director, Human Rights and Security Initiative, and Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Pro- gram, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) ....................................................................................... 21 APPENDICES Prepared statement of Hon. Alcee L. Hastings ........................ 30 Prepared statement of Hon. Christopher Smith ....................... 31 Prepared statement of Hon. Joseph R. Pitts ............................. 32 Prepared statement of Sergey Cherepanov ............................... 33 Prepared statement of Musa Klebnikov .................................... 36 Prepared statement of William Browder .................................. 39 Prepared statement of Sarah E. Mendelson ............................. 48 Material submitted for the record by: The Russian Federation .......................................................... 54 The European Association of Jehovah’s Christian Wit- nesses .................................................................................... 71 Geraldine Fagan, Forum 18 News Service ............................ 86 Joseph K. Grieboski, Founder and President, Institute on Religion and Public Policy ................................................... 92 Ilya Katsnelson, Managing Director, VTMS in Copen- hagen, Denmark ................................................................... 98 Paul LeGendre, Director, Fighting Discrimination Pro- gram, Human Rights First .................................................. 104 (III) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:23 Sep 18, 2012 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 0484 U:\WORK\062309.TXT KATIE IV Page Karinna Moskalenko, Director, International Protection Center ................................................................................... 110 Nina Ognianova, Europe and Central Asia Program Coor- dinator, Committee to Protect Journalists ........................ 115 Tim Osborne, Director, GML Ltd ........................................... 120 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:23 Sep 18, 2012 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 0484 U:\WORK\062309.TXT KATIE THE MEDVEDEV THAW: IS IT REAL? WILL IT LAST? March 4, 2008 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE WASHINGTON, DC The hearing was held at 10 a.m. in room SVC 203/202 Capitol Visitor Center, Washington, DC, Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin, Chair- man, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, pre- siding. Commissioners present: Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin, Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; and Hon. Dar- rell E. Issa, Commissioner, Commission on Security and Coopera- tion in Europe. Witnesses present: Sergey Cherepanov, Russia Coordinator, Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania; Musa Klebnikov, Executive Director, The Paul Klebnikov Fund; William Browder, CEO, Hermitage Capital Management; and Sarah E. Mendelson, Director, Human Rights and Security Initiative, and Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). HON. BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE Mr. CARDIN. Let me welcome everyone to today’s hearing for the Helsinki Commission. The hearing today will concentrate on Rus- sia. I think it’s a very timely hearing for the Commission consid- ering that President Obama will shortly be traveling to Moscow and that our Helsinki Commission will participate in the Par- liamentary Assembly in Vilnius next week. I think this hearing is particularly important and I want to thank all of the witnesses for making extraordinary efforts to be here. We’ve had some travel halfway around the world in order to be at this hearing today and one from London. We appreciate those efforts. I think it’s critically important for us to understand what is hap- pening in Russia. It’s evolving all the time—in the news today about—in Russia, what’s happening in that region. Our bilateral relationship in recent years has unfortunately been cool at best. Some of this is the result of the failed policies of the Bush adminis- tration, but the Russian government has regressed on reform. The rollback of Russia’s fledgling democracy, the erosion of the rule of law, the deadly attacks on independent journalists and the (1) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:23 Sep 18, 2012 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 U:\WORK\062309.TXT KATIE 2 recent war in Georgia are just a few of the many examples of hard- line policies emanating from the Kremlin. The new administration has been quite active in reaching out to Russia and there has already been a number of high-level meet- ings. I am hopeful that we are at the beginning of a new and fruit- ful partnership with Russia. Although our two great countries may not see eye to eye, being best friends may not be the measure of a successful relationship. There are many issues of mutual concern that we cannot afford to ignore, and restoring trust and mutual respect with Russia will allow us to pursue common security while fully upholding our OSCE commitments. Some in the human rights community here and in Russia are concerned that the reset in U.S.-Russia relations may lead to less attention being paid to traditional concerns such as religious free- dom, media freedom and the rule of law. Today’s hearing is in- tended to send the message that the laudable goals of improving relations with Russia and taking Russia’s compliance with human rights commitments seriously need not be mutually exclusive. When General Secretary Brezhnev signed the Helsinki Final Acts or the Helsinki Accords on August 1st, 1975 on behalf of the USSR, Soviet officials believed that they had gained an important foreign policy victory. Indeed, there were some provisions the So- viet diplomats had sought during negotiations with the 35 nations that they were successful in accomplishing. However, the West, for its part, had insisted on certain provi- sions in the area of human rights and humanitarian affairs, includ- ing the right of citizens to know their rights and to act upon them. In this context it is worth reminding everyone that since the 1991 Moscow Declaration, raising human rights concerns in the OSCE context is the legitimate prerogative of participating states and cannot be construed as interference in another country’s inter- nal affairs as the OSCE states have recognized the right and obli- gation to monitor and comment on the fulfillment of human rights commitments in any OSCE country. It’s our responsibility. We have the perfect right to raise viola- tions of OSCE commitments in any of the OSCE countries. As Chairman of this Commission I take seriously my responsibility im- plementation of the Helsinki Final Act and subsequent agreements throughout the expansive OSCE region, including in my own coun- try, and I have done that. Governments, including parliamentarians, have an important role to play in candidly raising human rights concerns and cases as part of their ongoing engagement. As the late Soviet human rights advocate Andrei Sakharov once observed, ‘‘The whole point of the Helsinki Accords is the mutual monitoring, not mutual eva- sion, of difficult problems.’’
Recommended publications
  • James Rowson Phd Thesis Politics and Putinism a Critical Examination
    Politics and Putinism: A Critical Examination of New Russian Drama James Rowson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Royal Holloway, University of London Department of Drama, Theatre & Dance September 2017 1 Declaration of Authorship I James Rowson hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract This thesis will contextualise and critically explore how New Drama (Novaya Drama) has been shaped by and adapted to the political, social, and cultural landscape under Putinism (from 2000). It draws on close analysis of a variety of plays written by a burgeoning collection of playwrights from across Russia, examining how this provocative and political artistic movement has emerged as one of the most vehement critics of the Putin regime. This study argues that the manifold New Drama repertoire addresses key facets of Putinism by performing suppressed and marginalised voices in public arenas. It contends that New Drama has challenged the established, normative discourses of Putinism presented in the Russian media and by Putin himself, and demonstrates how these productions have situated themselves in the context of the nascent opposition movement in Russia. By doing so, this thesis will offer a fresh perspective on how New Drama’s precarious engagement with Putinism provokes political debate in contemporary Russia, and challenges audience members to consider their own role in Putin’s autocracy. The first chapter surveys the theatrical and political landscape in Russia at the turn of the millennium, focusing on the political and historical contexts of New Drama in Russian theatre and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • No Justice for Journalists in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia September 2011
    No Justice for Journalists in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia September 2011 ARTICLE 19 Free Word Centre 60 Farringdon Road London EC1R 3GA United Kingdom Tel: +44 20 7324 2500 Fax: +44 20 7490 0566 E-mail: [email protected] www.article19.org International Media Support (IMS) Nørregarde 18, 2nd floor 1165 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel: +45 88 32 7000 Fax: +45 33 12 0099 E-mail: [email protected] www.i-m-s.dk ISBN: 978-1-906586-27-0 © ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS), London and Copenhagen, August 2011 This work is provided under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 licence. You are free to copy, distribute and display this work and to make derivative works, provided you: 1) give credit to ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS); 2) do not use this work for commercial purposes; 3) distribute any works derived from this publication under a licence identical to this one. To access the full legal text of this licence, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ legalcode. ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS) would appreciate receiving a copy of any materials in which information from this report is used. This report was written and published within the framework of a project supported by the International Media Support (IMS) Media and Democracy Programme for Central and Eastern Europe and the Caucasus. It was compiled and written by Nathalie Losekoot, Senior Programme Officer for Europe at ARTICLE 19 and reviewed by JUDr. Barbora Bukovskà, Senior Director for Law at ARTICLE 19 and Jane Møller Larsen, Programme Coordinator for the Media and Democracy Unit at International Media Support (IMS).
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Department External Policies CITIZENS in DANGER HUMAN
    BRIEFING PAPER Policy Department External Policies CITIZENS IN DANGER HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOM IN PUTIN’S RUSSIA HUMAN RIGHTS February 2008 JANUARY 2004 EN This briefing paper was requested by the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights. This study is published in the following languages: EN, FR (OR), RU Author: Marie Mendras, researcher Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris Administrator: Andrea Subhan Directorate-General for External Policies Policy Department BD4 06 M 071 rue Wiertz, 60 B-1047 Brussels Manuscript completed in February 2008. This study is available on the Internet at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies.do?language=FR Brussels: European Parliament, 2008. The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. ©European Communities, 2008 Marie Mendras is a researcher at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Russia expert at the Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Internationales (CERI). She teaches at Sciences Po University in Paris. She runs the Observatoire de la Russie at CERI and in particular has published Comment fonctionne la Russie ? Le politique, le bureaucrate et l’oligarque, Autrement, 2003, and La Russie de Poutine, Pouvoirs, Le Seuil, 2005. Her publications in English include: Russia and Europe. The Challenge of Proximity, Europa Institut Zürich, Schulthess, 2004, ‘Back to the Besieged Fortress?’ in Putin’s Empire, Stefan Batory Foundation, Warsaw, 2007, ‘Authority and Identity in Russia’ in Katlijn Malfliet, ed., Elusive Russia, Leuven, 2007. Marie Mendras studied at Essex University, Sciences Po Paris, Institut des Langues et Civilisations Orientales, Johns Hopkins University Bologna Center, and Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter in Support of Amb. Bonnie Jenkins to Help Lead U.S. Efforts on Arms Control and International Security
    Open Letter in Support of Amb. Bonnie Jenkins to Help Lead U.S. Efforts on Arms Control and International Security June 21, 2021 As President Biden's Interim National Security Strategy notes: "Global dynamics have shifted. New crises demand our attention.” It is a "moment of accelerating global challenges — from the pandemic to the climate crisis to nuclear proliferation .…" This means that our nation has no time to lose when it comes to putting in place the leadership team in government that can harness America's diplomatic power, which is essential to advancing effective solutions to address the most difficult security and foreign policy challenges. As arms control, international security, and foreign policy experts with years of experience in and out of government, we believe President Joe Biden — or any president — needs a strong and experienced team in place to address issues of international security, particularly the difficult and urgent challenges posed by nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the countries that possess them or that could develop them. Five months since inauguration day, the president’s nominee for one of the most important positions in this area — Amb. Bonnie Jenkins for Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security — has yet to be confirmed. Further delays of this nomination will hamper our nation’s ability to put its best diplomatic foot forward at a critical time. In the coming weeks and months, her leadership will be important to help the State Department and the White House:
    [Show full text]
  • Ameroca's New World Order
    Ameroca’s New World Order Copyright 2008 Christian Patriot All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Contents • Preface ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 • Chapter 1 The North American Union and the End of America’s Sovereignty? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................4 • Chapter 2 The New World Order’s Global Agenda, Ten World Unions of Revelation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……8 • Chapter 3 Who’s behind the New World Order? A Brief History of the NWO? …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………11 • Chapter 4 Law – Patriot Act, Coming Martial Law, UN LOST Treaty (World Law) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 • Chapter 5 Military –REX 84, FEMA Camps, UN Peacekeeping Force (World Military) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………...25 • Chapter 6 Economics – Amero (World Currency), Historical Transactions, NWO Banks …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….39 • Chapter 7 Politics – CFR & TLC, Bilderberg Group, United Nations (World Government) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..44 • Chapter 8 Mental – The Media (World Propaganda), Tavistock Institute, MK Ultra …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….55 • Chapter 9 False Religion – Bohemian Grove, Skull & Bones, Freemasons, WCC …..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..60
    [Show full text]
  • Businessmen V. Investigators: Who Is Responsible for the Poor Russian Investment Climate?
    BUSINESSMEN V. INVESTIGATORS: WHO IS ReSPONSIBLE FOR THE POOR RUSSIAN INVESTMENT CLIMATE? Dmitry Gololobov, University of Westminster (London, UK) This article aims to examine the extent to which Russian investigations into economic and financial crimes are influenced by such factors as systemic problems with Russian gatekeepers, the absence of a formal corporate whistle-blowing mechanism and the continuous abuse of the law by the Russian business community. The traditional critical approach to the quality and effectiveness of Russian economic and financial investigations does not produce positive results and needs to be reformulated by considering the opinions of entrepreneurs. The author considers that forcing Russian entrepreneurs, regardless of the size of their business, to comply with Russian laws and regulations may be a more efficient way to develop the business environment than attempting to gradually improve the Russian judicial system. It is also hardly possible to expect the Russian investigatory bodies to investigate what are effectively complex economic and financial crimes in the almost complete absence of a developed whistle-blowing culture. Such a culture has greatly contributed to the success of widely-publicised corporate and financial investigations in the United States and Europe. The poor development of the culture of Russian gatekeepers and the corresponding regulatory environment is one more significant factor that permanently undermines the effectiveness of economic investigations and damages the investment climate. Key words: Russia; investigation; economic crime; gatekeepers; whistleblowing. 1. Introduction The aim of this article is to analyse the ongoing conflict between Russian investigators and the Russian business community, and to make one more attempt at answering the long-standing question regarding how a satisfactory balance between the interests of effective investigation and the protection of the business community can be reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Completeandleft
    MEN WOMEN 1. Adam Ant=English musician who gained popularity as the Amy Adams=Actress, singer=134,576=68 AA lead singer of New Wave/post-punk group Adam and the Amy Acuff=Athletics (sport) competitor=34,965=270 Ants=70,455=40 Allison Adler=Television producer=151,413=58 Aljur Abrenica=Actor, singer, guitarist=65,045=46 Anouk Aimée=Actress=36,527=261 Atif Aslam=Pakistani pop singer and film actor=35,066=80 Azra Akin=Model and actress=67,136=143 Andre Agassi=American tennis player=26,880=103 Asa Akira=Pornographic act ress=66,356=144 Anthony Andrews=Actor=10,472=233 Aleisha Allen=American actress=55,110=171 Aaron Ashmore=Actor=10,483=232 Absolutely Amber=American, Model=32,149=287 Armand Assante=Actor=14,175=170 Alessandra Ambrosio=Brazilian model=447,340=15 Alan Autry=American, Actor=26,187=104 Alexis Amore=American pornographic actress=42,795=228 Andrea Anders=American, Actress=61,421=155 Alison Angel=American, Pornstar=642,060=6 COMPLETEandLEFT Aracely Arámbula=Mexican, Actress=73,760=136 Anne Archer=Film, television actress=50,785=182 AA,Abigail Adams AA,Adam Arkin Asia Argento=Actress, film director=85,193=110 AA,Alan Alda Alison Armitage=English, Swimming=31,118=299 AA,Alan Arkin Ariadne Artiles=Spanish, Model=31,652=291 AA,Alan Autry Anara Atanes=English, Model=55,112=170 AA,Alvin Ailey ……………. AA,Amedeo Avogadro ACTION ACTION AA,Amy Adams AA,Andre Agasi ALY & AJ AA,Andre Agassi ANDREW ALLEN AA,Anouk Aimée ANGELA AMMONS AA,Ansel Adams ASAF AVIDAN AA,Army Archerd ASKING ALEXANDRIA AA,Art Alexakis AA,Arthur Ashe ATTACK ATTACK! AA,Ashley
    [Show full text]
  • Spiritual and Moral Foundations of Craft Profession Training
    Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 13(1b), em78 ISSN:1306-3057 OPEN ACCESS Research Paper https://doi.org/10.29333/ejac/102243 Spiritual and Moral Foundations of Craft Profession Training Nikolay K. Chapaev 1, Andrei V. Efanov 1*, Ekaterina Yu. Bychkova 1, Evgenij M. Dorozhkin 1, 1 Olga B. Akimova 1 Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, Ekaterinburg, RUSSIA Received 24 August 2018 ▪ Revised 25 November 2018 ▪ Accepted 7 December 2018 ABSTRACT The relevance of the problem under consideration stemmed from the need of revival of craft education system in Russia which focuses on training personnel for small handicraft enterprises, and it is also very important to identify, to preserve and to adapt it to the modern realities of pedagogical experience which was gained by the vocational education system in the past. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the need for development of spiritual, moral, organizational and pedagogical foundations of craft vocational education development in Russia theoretically and methodologically. The central approach to the investigation of this problem is the study and generalization of pedagogical experience which makes it possible to substantiate the tendencies of formation of a new type of vocational education in Russia. The result of the study was the substantiation of the key qualities of a master craftsman as a creative thinker and craft labour as a man-making system of knowledge and practical experience forming “multidimensional human integrity”. The statement that modern craft education should take into account the productive and transforming essence of a person as fully as possible, and thus, it should be acmeologically oriented can be considered the key conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    APPROVED: by the General Shareholders’ Meeting of Open Joint-Stock Company Enel Russia on June 17, 2015 Minutes № 2/15 dd. June 17, 2015 PRELIMINARY APPROVED: by the OJSC Enel Russia Board of Directors on April 22, 2015 Minutes № 05/15 dd. April 22, 2015 2014 ANNUAL REPORT General Director of OJSC Enel Russia June ___, 2015 __________ / K. Palasciano Villamagna/ Chief Accountant of OJSC Enel Russia June ___, 2015 _________ / E.A. Dubtsova/ Moscow 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Address of the company management to shareholders .................................................................... 4 1.1. Address of the chairman of the board of directors .................................................................... 4 1.2. Address of the general director .................................................................................................. 6 2. Calendar of events ............................................................................................................................ 8 3. The company’s background............................................................................................................ 11 4. The board of directors report: results of the company priority activities ...................................... 12 4.1. Financial and economic performance of the company ............................................................ 12 4.1.1. Analysis of financial performance dynamics in comparison with the previous period........ 12 4.1.2. Dividend history ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DISCOVER URAL Ekaterinburg, 22 Vokzalnaya Irbit, 2 Proletarskaya Street Sysert, 51, Bykova St
    Alapayevsk Kamyshlov Sysert Ski resort ‘Gora Belaya’ The history of Kamyshlov is an The only porcelain In winter ‘Gora Belaya’ becomes one of the best skiing Alapayevsk, one of the old town, interesting by works in the Urals, resort holidays in Russia – either in the quality of its ski oldest metallurgical its merchants’ houses, whose exclusive faience runs, the service quality or the variety of facilities on centres of the region, which are preserved until iconostases decorate offer. You can rent cross-country skis, you can skate or dozens of churches around where the most do snowtubing, you can visit a swimming-pool or do rope- honorable industrial nowadays. The main sight the world, is a most valid building of the Middle 26 of Kamyshlov is two-floored 35 reason to visit the town of 44 climbing park. In summer there is a range of active sports Urals stands today, is Pokrovsky cathedral Sysert. You can go to the to do – carting, bicycling and paintball. You can also take inseparably connected (1821), founded in honor works with an excursion and the lifter to the top of Belaya Mountain. with the names of many of victory over Napoleon’s try your hand at painting 180 km from Ekaterinburg, 1Р-352 Highway faience pieces. You can also extend your visit with memorial great people. The elegant Trinity Church was reconstructed army. Every august the jazz festival UralTerraJazz, one of the through the settlement of Uraletz by the direction by the renowned architect M.P. Malakhov, and its burial places of industrial history – the dam and the workshop 53 top-10 most popular open-air fests in Russia, takes place in sign ‘Gora Belaya’ + 7 (3435) 48-56-19, gorabelaya.ru vaults serve as a shelter for the Romanov Princes – the Kamyshlov.
    [Show full text]
  • Art, Religion and Hatred
    ART, RELIGION AND HATRED Religious Intolerance in Russia and its Effects on Art London December 2005 ARTICLE 19 · 6-8 Amwell Street · London EC1R 1UQ · United Kingdom Tel +44 20 7278 9292 · Fax +44 20 7278 7660 · [email protected] · http://www.article19.org ARTICLE 19 GLOBAL CAMPAIGN FOR FREE EXPRESSION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 3 1.1. Russia’s Religious Composition ........................................................... 3 2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RUSSIAN LAW ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE INCITEMENT OF RELIGIOUS HATRED ... 4 2.1. International Standards ......................................................................... 4 2.2. Russian Law and Practice ..................................................................... 5 2.3. Analysis of Article 282’s Application................................................... 6 2.4. Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations................. 6 3. ATTACKS ON ARTWORK....................................................................... 7 3.1. Oleg Yanushevski................................................................................. 7 3.2. Misuse of Incitement to Religious Hatred Legislation: the Sakharov Exhibition and Others.................................................................................. 9 4. A CLIMATE OF INTOLERANCE........................................................... 11 4.1. Anti-Semitism....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who Is Who? Who Is Behind It?
    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Avenue d’Auderghem 61/16, 1040 Brussels Phone/Fax: 32 2 3456145 Email: [email protected] – Website: http://www.hrwf.eu No Entreprise: 0473.809.960 The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who is Who? Who is Behind it? By Willy Fautré The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults About the so-called experts of the Israeli Center for Victims of Cults and Yad L'Achim Rami Feller ICVC Directors Some Other So-called Experts Some Dangerous Liaisons of the Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Conclusions Annexes Brussels, 1 September 2018 The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who is Who? Who is Behind it? The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults (ICVC) is well-known in Israel for its activities against a number of religious and spiritual movements that are depicted as harmful and dangerous. Over the years, the ICVC has managed to garner easy access to the media and Israeli government due to its moral panic narratives and campaign for an anti-cult law. It is therefore not surprising that the ICVC has also emerged in Europe, in particular, on the website of FECRIS (European Federation of Centers of Research and Information on Cults and Sects), as its Israel correspondent.1 For many years, FECRIS has been heavily criticized by international human rights organizations for fomenting social hostility and hate speech towards non-mainstream religions and worldviews, usually of foreign origin, and for stigmatizing members of these groups.2 Religious studies scholars and the scientific establishment in general have also denounced FECRIS for the lack of expertise of their so-called “cult experts”.
    [Show full text]