DOCSLIB.ORG

Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege EDITED BY PETER GEACH Senior Lect~rrerin P/~ilosup/ry,C~ri~,ersity qf Bir~ni~!flt~rin AND MAX BLACK Profeaor of PhiIl~s,scrp/r~,Ci~rr~ell Cl~~ivcrsity BASIL BLACKWELL OXFORD . I 960 First Edition 1952 Second Edition 1960 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN FOR BASIL BLACKWELL & MOTT LTD. BY THE COMPTON PRINTING WORKS (LONDON) LTD., LONDON, N.I AND BOUND BY THE KEMP HALL BINDERY, OXFORD PREFACE ONEaim of this volume is to make available to English readers FregeYsmere important logical essays, which have long been buried in various German periodicals (mostly now defunct). ~esidesthese we have given certain extracts from his Grund- gesetze der Arithmetik; these can be understood in the light of the essays, without the reader's needing to follow the chain of deduc- tion in the Grundgesetze. Special attention should be paid to Frege's discussion of Russell's paradox in the appendix to Vol. ii of the Grundgesetze. It is dis- creditable that logical works should repeat the legend of Frege's abandoning his researches in despair when faced with the paradox; in fact he indicates a line of solution, which others might well have followed out farther. The authorship of the various versions is stated in the table of contents. All versions have been revised with a view to uniform rendering of Frege's special terms; a glossary of these terms is supplied. Footnote flags such as A,B, relate to translators' footnotes; other footnotes are Frege's own. Acknowledgments are due to the editors of Mind and the Philosophical Review, for permission to use versions first published there. Acknowledgment is also due for use of the translations made from Vol. i of the Grundgesetze by P. E. B. Jourdain and J. Stachelroth (which were first published in the Monist, 1915-17), to the owners of the copyright, whom it has un- fortunately proved impossible to trace. Professor Ryle and Lord Russell have been most helpful by lending works of Frege that' were otherwise almost unobtainable. MAX BLACK. P. T. GEACH. NOTE TO SECOND EDITION WEhave made a number of corrections for this second impression. Mr. Michael Dummett was kind enough to check the whole translation and give us his advice. A new footnote on p. 243 refers to recent work on 'Frege's Way Out'. M. B. P. T. G. CONTENTS PAGE preface . v Note to Second Edition . vi Glossary . BEGRIFFSSCHRFT(Chapter I). Translated by P. T. GEACH. FUNCTIONAND CONCEPT.Translated by P. T. GEACH . ON CONCEPTAND OBJECT.Translated by P. T. GEACH ON SENSEAND REFERENCE.Translated by MAXBLACK . Illustrative Extracts &om Frege's Review of Husserl's Philosophie der Arithmetik. Translated by P. T. GEACH. A CRITICALELUCIDATION OF SOME POINTSIN E. SCHROE DER'S ALGEBRA DER LOGK. Translated by P. T. GEACH. WHATIS A FUNCTION?Translated by P. T. GEACH . NEGATION.Translated by P. T. GEACH . TRANSLATIONOF PARTS OF FREGE'S GRUNDG~ZE DER ARITHMETIK: Selections &om Volume I. Translated by P. E. B. JOURDAINand J. STACHELROTH. (Translated by P. T. GEACH)I1 (Vol. 11, §§13g-44,1467) FREGEAGAINST THE FORMALISTS(~01. II, §§86-137) . Translated by MAXBLACK FREGEON RUSSELL'SPARADOX (Appendix to Vol. 11) . Translated by P. T. GEACH GLOSSARY THEspecial terms used by Frege have been rendered as follows: Anschauung intuition, experiencc Art des Gegebenseins mode of prcsentation bedeutenl stand for Bedeutungl reference [occasionally: what . stands for] Begd concept [in the logical sense] Behauptungssatz declarative sentence beurtheilbarer Inhalt possible content of judgment eigentliche Zahl actual number [as opposed to a nunieral] Figur2 figure formal formal(ist) Gebild2 character, structure Gedankes thought Gegenstand object gewiihnliche (Bedeutung) customary (reference) gleich, GleichheitP equal, equality inhaltlich meaningful [an epithet of arith- metic interpreted in a non- formalist fashion] objektiv6 ob'ective Rechenspiel c1 culating game [~rithmeticon the formahst view] Rechnungsart arithmetical operation [addition, subtraction, etc.] Satz sentence, proposition, theorem, clause [according to context] The natural rendering of these words would be 'mean' and 'meaning'; this rendering is actually required for their occurrence in German works quoted by Frege, and for his own use of the words when alluding to such quotations. But 'meaning' in ordinary English often answers to Frege's Sinrt rather than Bedeutung. Russell's 'indicate' and 'indication' are barred because we need 'indicate' rather for attdeuten. The renderings given here seem to be the simplest means of expressing Frege's thought faithfully. Philosophical technicalities, like 'referent' or 'denotation' or 'nominatum,' would give a misleading impression of Frege's style. 'These two words are used to refer to supposedly meaningless marks, such as numerals are on the formalist theory. Both words must often also be rendered '(chess) piece.' Frege regards a 'thought' as sharable by many thinkers, and thus as objective. Frege remarks concerning these words that Be takes them to express strict identity, but other mathematicians disagree; 'equality' therefore seems preferable to 'identity.' It must be carefully noticed that the German words rendered 'object' and 'objective' are not connected in etymology or in Frege's mind. Concepts are fundamentally different from objects; but they are objective, i.e. not private to a particular thinker. ix x GLOSSARY Sinn sense Stufe level [of a concept or function] (unbestirnrnt) andeutenl indicate (indehtely) ungerade (Bedeutung) indirect (reference) [i.e. pertaining to words in oratio obliquo or virtual oratio obliaual1 a 'unsaturated' idea, image [regarded as essentially private] Wahrheitswerth truth-value Werthverlauf value-range, range of values [of a function] 1 Thic term is applied to pronouns (e.g. relative pronouns) and also to letters used as variables. (Frege Wedthe term 'variable'; cf. hi essay What is a Function?) This is Frege's term for such fragmentary expressions as '-conquered Gaul' or 'the capital of -'; and also for their Bedeutung, i.e. what they stand for. He may well have had in mind unsaturated molecules, which, without dissolution of their existing structure, can take up more atoms. To emphasize, as Frege does, the metaphorical nature of the term, we always write it in quotation marks. Contrasted--%th Begrif and Gedonke (q.v.). BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT a formalized Language of pure Thought modelled upon the Language of Arithmetic First published in 1879 I. EXPLANATION OF THE SYMBOLS THEsymbols used in the general theory of magnitude fall into two kinds. The first consists of the letters; each letter represents either an indeterminate number or an indeterminate function. This indeterminateness makes it possible to express by means of letters the general validity of propositions; e.g. : (a + b)c = ac + bc. The other kind contains such symbols as +, -, 4,o, I, 2; each of these has its own proper meaning.^ I adopt this fundamental idea of distinguishing two kinds of symbols (which unfortunately is not smctly carried out in the theory of magnitude*) in order to make it generally applicable in the wider domain of pure thought. Accordingly, I divide all the symbols I use into those that can be taken to mean various things and those that have a fully determinate sense. The first kind are letters, and their main task is to be the expression ofgenerality. For all their indeterminateness, it must be laid down that a letter retains in a given context the meaning once given to it. $ 2. Judgment A judgment is always to be +expressed by means of the sign This stands to the left of the sign or complex of signs in which the content of the judgment is given. ~fwe omit the little vertical p. 21 stroke at the left end of the horizontal stroke, then the * Consider the symbols 1, log, sin, Lim. A I render Bedeutung by 'meaning' or 'significance' throughout this work. since Frege had not yet begun to use it in his own special sense. Various other words, e.g. Begg ('concept') and Vorstellung ('idea') are also used in a less precise sense than he later gave to them. 1 2 TRANSLATIONS FROM THE WRITINGS OF GOTTLOB FREGE judgment is to be transformed into a men complex of ideas; the author is not expressing his recognition or non-recognition of the truth of this. Thus, let mean the judgment: 'unlike magnetic poles attract one another.' In that case A will not express this judgment; it d be intended just to produce in the reader the idea of the mutual attraction of unlike magnetic poles-so that, e.g., he may make inferences from this thought and test its correctness on the basis of these. In this case we qualify the expression with the words 'the circumstance that' or 'the proposition that.' Not every content can be turned into a judgment by prefixing 1- 1- to a symbol for the content; e.g. the idea 'house' cannot. Hence we distinguish contents that are, and contents that are not, possible contents ofjudgment.? As a constituent of the sign +the horizontal stroke combines the symbolsfollowing it into a whole; assertion, which is expressed by the vertical stroke at the left end ofthe horizontal one, relates to the whole thusforrned. The horizontal stroke I wish to call the content-stroke, and the vertical the judgment-stroke. The content-stroke is also to serve the purpose of relating any sign whatsoever to the whole formed by the symbols f~llowingthe stroke. The content of what follows the content-stroke must altuays be a possible content ofjudgment. A distinction of subject and predicate finds no place in my way of representing a judgment. In order to justify this, let me observe that there are two ways in which the content of two judgments may differ; it may, or it may not, be the case that all inferences that can be drawn from the first judgment when combined with * I use Greek uncials as abbreviations; if I give no special explanation of them I wish the reader to supply an appropriate sense.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Meaning and Significance of Dispute on Objectless Presentations
    NeuroQuantology | December 2018 | Volume 16 | Issue 12 | Page 87-91| doi: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.12.1344 Seliverstov S., The Meaning and Significance of Dispute on Objectless Presentations The Meaning and Significance of Dispute on Objectless Presentations Vladimir Seliverstov* ABSTRACT This paper considers the evolution of understanding and the status of objectless presentations in the works of the three main authors of this tradition: “The Theory of Science” by B. Bolzano, “On Content and Object of Presentations” by K. Twardowski and “Intentional Objects” by E. Husserl. A critical analysis of these positions on objectless presentations is interesting, because here in one point, in one discussion, we have several very important philosophical theories that have had an impact on the philosophical debates in the twentieth century, particularly on the discussion Alexius Meinong and Bertrand Russell at the beginning of XX century. We want to show, how this Meinong’s conception has contemporary philosophy. Here author aims to show how theory of objects as such came into being and how its main ideasmade weresignificant discussed contribution and criticized into the in problemsubsequent of nonexistent philosophical objects thought. that Thisstill remainsdispute pushesone of theus tomost think debated that we in deal here with fundamental ideological differences between these conceptions. Therefore, it allowed to consider another important philosophical and methodological problem - the problem of incommunicability between logical and psychological conceptions. Key Words: Bolzano, Twardowski, Theory of Objects, Phenomenology, Objectless Presentations, Intentionality 87 DOI Number: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.12.1344 NeuroQuantology 2018; 16(12):87-91 The Problem he is often called a precursor of analytic philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Russellians Can Have a No Proposition View of Empty Names
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2017.1372307 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Hodgson, T. (2018). Russellians can have a no proposition view of empty names. Inquiry, 61(7), 670-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1372307 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Either in Plain Text Format As Am Attached PDF) at the End of the Term
    History of Analytic Philosophy410 — Syllabus Lecturer: SidneyFelder,e-mail: [email protected] Rutgers The State University of NewJersey, Spring 2021 “Office Hours” (i.e., individual discussions): By Appointment Formanyreasons, there is no uncontroversial general characterization of the range of work that tends to be classified under the heading “Analytic Philosophy”. For our purposes, an analytic philosopher is anyone whose work is conducted in awareness of the fundamental importance, for every variety of foundational and philosophical inquiry,ofobtaining a proper understanding of what properties of thought, perception, language, and the world, and what properties of their relationship, makepossible the meaningful ascription of truth, fal- sity,and referential significance of anykind to such things as thoughts, beliefs, sentences, propositions, and judgments. This course covers the early history of analytic philosophy, concentrating largely on writings of Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell, G.E. Moore, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, whose work secured recognition of the necessity as well as the great difficulty of this kind of inquiry. Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 Transition from idealism, naturalism, and Kantianism Russell Our Knowledgeofthe External World (1914) Chapter I, Current Tendencies; Chapter II, Logic As the Essence of Philosophy Frege The Foundations of Arithmetic (1884) , Introduction and sections 1-28. Moore Principia Ethica (1903) , Chapters I, II, III (36-44) ,VI(110-121) Russell The Principles of Mathematics (1903) , Chapters I, III (Sections 37-38, 43-45) ,IV, V(56-60, 63-65) ,VI(66-74) , VIII (86-87, 93) ,IX, X, XVI, XXVI, XXVII (217-219) ,XLII, XLIII (337-341) ,LI Weeks 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Construction of a Language for Mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus</Em>
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 8-6-2008 Three Wittgensteins: Interpreting the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Thomas J. Brommage Jr. University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Brommage, Thomas J. Jr., "Three Wittgensteins: Interpreting the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" (2008). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/149 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Three Wittgensteins: Interpreting the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Thomas J. Brommage, Jr. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Kwasi Wiredu, B.Phil. Co-Major Professor: Stephen P. Turner, Ph.D. Charles B. Guignon, Ph.D. Richard N. Manning, J. D., Ph.D. Joanne B. Waugh, Ph.D. Date of Approval: August 6, 2008 Keywords: Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, logical empiricism, resolute reading, metaphysics © Copyright 2008 , Thomas J. Brommage, Jr. Acknowledgments There are many people whom have helped me along the way. My most prominent debts include Ray Langely, Billy Joe Lucas, and Mary T. Clark, who trained me in philosophy at Manhattanville College; and also to Joanne Waugh, Stephen Turner, Kwasi Wiredu and Cahrles Guignon, all of whom have nurtured my love for the philosophy of language.
    [Show full text]
  • Truths Containing Empty Names Michael Mckinsey
    In Philosophical Approaches to Proper Names, P. Stalmaszczyk and L. Fernández Moreno (eds.).Peter Lang, 2016. Truths Containing Empty Names Michael McKinsey 1. A problem for direct reference. According to the thesis of Direct Reference (or the DR-thesis for short), the propositions expressed by sentences containing the proper names and indexical pronouns of natural language are a strict function of the semantic referents of the names and indexicals, as opposed to being a function of any Fregean descriptive senses or contents that the names and indexicals might be alleged to possess.1 Another way of expressing this idea is to say that the sole semantic contribution that a proper name or indexical can make to the propositions expressed by sentences containing the term is the term’s semantic referent. Bertrand Russell called terms of this sort ‘names in the logical sense’ (1918, 201). I will call them ‘genuine terms’. Following standard practice, I will call the propositions expressed by sentences containing genuine terms, ‘singular propositions’. Like many others, I endorse the DR-thesis. In my case, the primary reason for endorsing the thesis lies in the modal considerations first briefly introduced by John Searle (1958) and later clarified and forcefully applied by Saul Kripke (1972a), considerations which show that proper names do not have the meanings of contingent definite descriptions. David Kaplan (1989) raised related points to support the conclusion that indexical pronouns are also genuine terms. In recent work I have argued at some length that the DR-thesis entails both that (a) a sentence containing a non-referring name or indexical can express no proposition, and hence that (b) such sentences can have no truth value, that is, can be neither true or false.
    [Show full text]
  • Frege's Influence on Wittgenstein: Reversing Metaphysics Via the Context Principle*
    Frege's Influence on Wittgenstein: Reversing Metaphysics via the Context Principle* Erich H. Reck Gottlob Frege and Ludwig Wittgenstein (the later Wittgenstein) are often seen as polar opposites with respect to their fundamental philosophical outlooks: Frege as a paradig- matic "realist", Wittgenstein as a paradigmatic "anti-realist". This opposition is supposed to find its clearest expression with respect to mathematics: Frege is seen as the "arch-pla- tonist", Wittgenstein as some sort of "radical anti-platonist". Furthermore, seeing them as such fits nicely with a widely shared view about their relation: the later Wittgenstein is supposed to have developed his ideas in direct opposition to Frege. The purpose of this paper is to challenge these standard assumptions. I will argue that Frege's and Wittgen- stein's basic outlooks have something crucial in common; and I will argue that this is the result of the positive influence Frege had on Wittgenstein. It would be absurd to claim that there are no important differences between Frege and Wittgenstein. Likewise, it would be absurd to claim that the later Wittgenstein was not critical of some of Frege's ideas. What, then, is the common element I see? My sugges- tion is that the two thinkers agree on what I call a reversal of metaphysics (relative to a standard kind of metaphysics attacked by both). This is not an agreement on one particu- lar thesis or on one argument. Rather, it has to do with what is prior and what is posterior when it comes to certain fundamental explanations in metaphysics (also, relatedly, in semantics and epistemology).
    [Show full text]
  • Empty Names, Fictional Names, Mythical Names
    NOUS^ 39:4 (2005) 596–631 Empty Names, Fictional Names, Mythical Names DAVID BRAUN University of Rochester John Stuart Mill (1843) thought that proper names denote individuals and do not connote attributes. Contemporary Millians agree, in spirit. We hold that the semantic content of a proper name is simply its referent. We also think that the semantic content of a declarative sentence is a Russellian structured proposition whose constituents are the semantic contents of the sentence’s constituents.1 This proposition is what the sentence semantically expresses. Therefore, we think that sentences containing proper names semantically express singular proposi- tions, which are propositions having individuals as constituents. For instance, the sentence ‘George W. Bush is human’ semantically expresses a proposition that has Bush himself as a constituent. Call this theory Millianism.2 Many philosophers initially find Millianism quite appealing, but find it much less so after considering its many apparent problems. Among these problems are those raised by non-referring names, which are sometimes (tendentiously) called empty names.3 Plausible examples of empty names include certain names from fiction, such as ‘Sherlock Holmes’, which I shall call fictional names, and certain names from myth and false scientific theory, such as ‘Pegasus’ and ‘Vulcan’, which I shall call mythical names.4 I have defended Millianism from objections concerning empty names in previous work (Braun [1993]). In this paper, I shall re-present those objec- tions, along with some new ones. I shall then describe my previous Millian theory of empty names, and my previous replies to the objections, and consider whether the theory or replies need revision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theatre of Death: the Uncanny in Mimesis Tadeusz Kantor, Aby Warburg, and an Iconography of the Actor; Or, Must One Die to Be Dead
    The Theatre of Death: The Uncanny in Mimesis Tadeusz Kantor, Aby Warburg, and an Iconography of the Actor; Or, must one die to be dead. Twitchin, Mischa The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8626 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] The Theatre of Death: The Uncanny in Mimesis Tadeusz Kantor, Aby Warburg, and an Iconography of the Actor; Or, must one die to be dead? Mischa Twitchin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1 The Theatre of Death: the Uncanny in Mimesis (Abstract) The aim of this thesis is to explore an heuristic analogy as proposed in its very title: how does a concept of the “uncanny in mimesis” and of the “theatre of death” give content to each other – historically and theoretically – as distinct from the one providing either a description of, or even a metaphor for, the other? Thus, while the title for this concept of theatre derives from an eponymous manifesto of Tadeusz Kantor’s, the thesis does not aim to explain what the concept might mean in this historically specific instance only. Rather, it aims to develop a comparative analysis, through the question of mimesis, allowing for different theatre artists to be related within what will be proposed as a “minor” tradition of modernist art theatre (that “of death”).
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Objects
    5 Concepts and Objects Ray Brassier 1. The question ‘What is real?’ stands at the crossroads of metaphysics and epistemol- ogy. More exactly, it marks the juncture of metaphysics and epistemology with the seal of conceptual representation. 2. Metaphysics understood as the investigation into what there is intersects with epistemology understood as the enquiry into how we know what there is. This intersec- tion of knowing and being is articulated through a theory of conception that explains how thought gains traction on being. 3. That the articulation of thought and being is necessarily conceptual follows from the Critical injunction which rules out any recourse to the doctrine of a pre-es- tablished harmony between reality and ideality. Thought is not guaranteed access to being; being is not inherently thinkable. There is no cognitive ingress to the real save through the concept. Yet the real itself is not to be confused with the concepts through which we know it. The fundamental problem of philosophy is to understand how to reconcile these two claims. 4. We gain access to the structure of reality via a machinery of conception which extracts intelligible indices from a world that is not designed to be intelligible and is not originarily infused with meaning. Meaning is a function of conception and con- ception involves representation—though this is not to say that conceptual representa- tion can be construed in terms of word-world mappings. It falls to conceptual ratio- nality to forge the explanatory bridge from thought to being. 5. Thus the metaphysical exploration of the structure of being can only be carried out in tandem with an epistemological investigation into the nature of conception.
    [Show full text]
  • DOES FREGE HAVE a PROBLEM with EMPTY NAMES? by Hans Robin Solberg
    DOES FREGE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH EMPTY NAMES? By Hans Robin Solberg hink about the following two identity statements: flexivity of identity), while the second is not and might T carry new information. This is because although ‘Afla’ and (1)Darth Vader = Anakin Skywalker. ‘Ateb’ name the same mountain (the reference), they are (2)Darth Vader = Robin Hood. also names of two different modes of presentation of the mountain. It has been argued that on this picture senses are depen- Intuitively, given the universe of Star Wars and the story dent on the objects that are given (e.g. Evans 1982:12–13, of Robin Hood, (1) is true and (2) is false. Also, asserting 22–33). The argument goes something like this: If sense these sentences in a conversation could, very plausibly, is the way a reference is presented to us, then if there is create either agreement or disagreement. And if I were to no reference there is no way it can be presented to us, i.e. assert (2), someone correcting me on my mistake about there is no sense. Empty names lack reference. So, empty Robin Hood would be right in doing so. names have no sense. In this text I’ll show that Frege’s account of empty na- This wouldn’t be a problem for Frege if he claimed that mes is at odds with the intuitive understanding and use there is no sense without reference, but he repeatedly does. sketched above.1 The text contains four parts. Part I deals For Frege, a sense is meant to be independent4 both of with Frege’s account of sense and reference.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theatre of Death: the Uncanny in Mimesis Tadeusz Kantor, Aby Warburg, and an Iconography of the Actor; Or, Must One Die to Be Dead?
    The Theatre of Death: The Uncanny in Mimesis Tadeusz Kantor, Aby Warburg, and an Iconography of the Actor; Or, must one die to be dead? Mischa Twitchin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1 The Theatre of Death: the Uncanny in Mimesis (Abstract) The aim of this thesis is to explore an heuristic analogy as proposed in its very title: how does a concept of the “uncanny in mimesis” and of the “theatre of death” give content to each other – historically and theoretically – as distinct from the one providing either a description of, or even a metaphor for, the other? Thus, while the title for this concept of theatre derives from an eponymous manifesto of Tadeusz Kantor’s, the thesis does not aim to explain what the concept might mean in this historically specific instance only. Rather, it aims to develop a comparative analysis, through the question of mimesis, allowing for different theatre artists to be related within what will be proposed as a “minor” tradition of modernist art theatre (that “of death”). This comparative enquiry – into theatre practices conceived of in terms of the relation between abstraction and empathy, in which the “model” for the actor is seen in mannequins, puppets, or effigies – is developed through such questions as the following: What difference does it make to the concept of “theatre” when thought of in terms “of death”? What thought of mimesis do the dead admit of? How has this been figured, historically, in aesthetics? How does an art of theatre participate
    [Show full text]
  • I HEGEL's LOGIC of ABSOLUTE IDEALISM and HIS POLITICAL
    HEGEL’S LOGIC OF ABSOLUTE IDEALISM AND HIS POLITICAL ARGUMENT: THE CONCEPTUALITY OF ACTUALITY A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Matthew J. Smetona May, 2010 Examining Committee Members: Aryeh Botwinick, Advisory Chair, Political Science Joseph M. Schwartz, Political Science Carol C. Gould, Philosophy and Political Science Joseph Margolis, External Member, Philosophy i © by Matthew J. Smetona 2010 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Title: Hegel’s Logic of Absolute Idealism and his Political Argument: The Conceptuality of Actuality Candidate’s Name: Matthew J. Smetona Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2010 Doctoral Advisory Committee Chair: Aryeh Botwinick This dissertation is about the theoretical foundation of Hegel’s political argument. Its goal is to comprehend the basic structure of that argument by articulating the conceptual framework Hegel employs when he asserts that the particular set of political institutions he is arguing for is rational. Its argument is that the criterion Hegel employs in his conception of rationality is that an object is rational if and only if it is comprehended by thought in and through the holistic inferential system of concepts he refers to as the Concept ( der Begriff ). Hegel’s final argument in the Science of Logic is that there can be no actual object that is not “rational,” i.e., that is not constituted, in all of its determinations, by the unified activity of thinking that is the Concept. Consequently, it is argued that the rationality, and therewith the actuality, of Hegel’s rational state depicted in the Philosophy of Right derives from the fact that it is comprehended by thought in and through the totality as thought that is the Concept.
    [Show full text]