DOCSLIB.ORG

9780801499548.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9780801499548.Pdf The Sel! and Its Pleasures Carolyn J. Dean THE SELF AND ITS PLEASURES Bataille, Lacan, and the History of the Decentered Sub;ect Cornell University Press Ithaca and London Copyright © 1992 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850, or visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. First published 1992 by Cornell University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dean, Carolyn J. (Carolyn Janice), 1960– The self and its pleasures / Carolyn J. Dean. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-2660-5 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-9954-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Self—History—20th century. 2. Self (Philosophy)—History— 20th century. 3. Masochism—History. 4. Criminal psychology—History. 5. Lacan, Jacques, 1901– . 6. Bataille, Georges, 1897–1962. 7. France— Intellectual life—20th century. I. Title. BF697.D363 1992 155.2'0944'0904—dc20 92-52748 The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 3050-2213d-1pass-r01.indd 1 22-03-2016 10:36:37 To my parents Harriet Katzman Dean Albert Robert Dean Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction I PART ONE Psychoanalysis and the Self II lo The Legal Status of the Irrational 17 2. Gender Complexes 5 8 3. Sight Unseen IReading the Unconsciousl 98 PART TWO Sade's Selflessness 123 4. The Virtue of Crime 127 5. The Pleasure of Pain 170 PART THREE Headlessness 201 6. Writing and Crime 205 7. Returning to the Scene of the Crime 221 Conclusion 246 Selected Bibliography 253 Index 265 [vii] Acknowledgments 1 thank the University of California at Berkeley and the An­ drew W. Mellon Foundation for providing the funds and leave time necessary to undertake the writing and research of this book. 1 am especially grateful to Mary Gluck, David Joravsky, and Sarah Maza, who graciously read various portions of the manu­ script. 1 am also indebted to Mark Poster's criticism and to Michael Roth, whose close reading of the final draft helped me clarify and sharpen my argumento 1 owe my most profound intellectual debts to Denis Hollier, Lynn Hunt, and Martin Jay, without whose encouragement, crit­ icism, and commitment this book might never have taken the direction it did. Martin Jay guided and commented on this work at every stage of its unfolding, and it is to him that 1 owe the deepest gratitude. John Ackerman, Judith Bailey, and the editorial staff at Cornell University Press helped prepare the final manuscript and offered invaluable assistance. Gretchen Schultz and Brigitte Mahuzier ad­ vised me on translations and helped me relax. For everything else, 1 thank my colleagues and friends Elizabeth Barnes, Laird Boswell, Julie Greenberg, Laura Hein, Walter Hixson, James Beale, Michael Sherry, Jennifer Terry, and Sharon Ullman. And a special thank you to Michael Polignano, Laurie Bernstein, Robert We inberg, and Nicole Albert. One portion of this book has appeared in differentform in Repre­ sentations 13 (Winter 1986). c. J. D. [ixl The Sel! and Its Pleasures Introduction In 1966 the historian Michel Foucault declared that the con­ cept of man I/would be erased, like a face drawn in sand at the edge of the sea."l Foucault's dramatic declaration represented the culmination of nearly a century of philosophical and aesthetic commentary that questioned whether "man" was in fact a unitary, transcendental, rational, knowing subject. Indeed, French modem­ ists, existentialists, phenomenologists, structuralists, and now poststructuralists have I/decentered" the seli in radically different ways since the late nineteenth century. They have developed the idea that the seli no longer masters the world through its reason but is mired in and constituted by culture. This book is about the development of one contemporary forro of seli-I/dissolution," whose different and most recent manifestations have often been terroed structuralist or poststructuralist. But it is aboye all an at­ tempt to account for the idea of a decentered seli as it has been articulated primarily in the works of two French thinkers who were friends as well as contemporaries: Georges Bataille (1897- 1962) and Jacques Lacan (1901-1981). 1 use their work to frame three interrelated questions: Why, quite simply, has France been the home of the most influential theories of seli-dissolution? How, then, is the decentered seli historically and culturally specific? And how do we account for rather than just describe what Judith Butler has called the I/regulatory fictions" that constitute it?2 Why, first of all, Bataille and Lacan? Intellectual historians and 1 Michel Foucault, Th e Order af Things (New York: Vintage, 1970), p. 387. 2Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion af Identity (New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1990), p. 33. [rl [2] The Self and Its Pleasures others usually place them in differentcategor ies. Scholars consider Lacan a structuralist (or a poststructuralist in disguise). No one calls Bataille a structuralist, sine e he never implicitly or explicitly used Saussurian linguistics to ground his thought. Instead, Jürgen Habermas places him first in a line that leads from "Bataille via Michel Foucault to Jacques Oerrida/'3 implying that Bataille is closest to poststructuralist thinkers. There have in fact been sever­ al recent attempts to see Bataille as a forerunner of poststruc­ turalism, and one critic claims that Bataille's work constitutes an "urtext of deconstruction."4 This effort to understand their work by reference to theories of the decentered subject helps us place Bataille and Lacan in the history of ideas. It tells us to whom they demonstrated intellectual affinities or allegiances, and it accounts for the significance of their contributions to the development of structuralist psychoanalysis or poststructuralist literary theory. But while it may be true, for example, that Lacan was Foucault's structuralist contemporary (in­ sofar as the early Foucault was seen as a structuralist), and Bataille his proto-poststructuralist predecessor, this kind of assertion still begs the question of the historical meaning and relevance of struc­ turalism and poststructuralism (not to mention the difficulty of pinning down Foucault). 1 have chosen Bataille and Lacan because they are each slippery enough to defy easy categorization and yet important enough in the history of French (and We stern) theories of the self to be considered predecessors, founders, or exemplars of particular schools of thought. So, what if we were to conceive their formulations of the self as local, historical practices rather than in terms of broad, shifting paradigms of subjectivity? 3 Jürgen Habermas, "Modernity-An Incomplete Project," in Hal Foster, ed., Th e Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture ¡Seattle: Bay Press, 1983), p. 14. 4 Allan Stoekl, Politics, Writing, Mutilation: The Cases of Bataille, Blanchot, Roussel, Leiris, and Ponge ¡Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985), p. xiii. Other attempts are Michele Richman, "Introduction to the College de So­ ciologie: Post-structuralism before Its Time?" Stanford French Review 12 ¡Spring 1988), 79-95; Jean-Michel Heimonet, Politiques de l'écriture: Bataille/Derrida: Le Sens du sacré dans la pensée fram;aise du surréalisme a nos jours ¡Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987); and Julian Pefanis, Heterology and the Postmodern: Bataille, Baudrillard, and Lyotard ¡Durham: Duke University Press, 1991), pp. 3, 9-58. Pefanis warns us to resist calling Bataille a poststructuralist or postmodernist "in order to avoid the easy retrospective projection of Bataille into a seminal prehistory of these two categories" ¡p. 40). Nevertheless, he proceeds to analyze Bataille more or les s in those terms. Introduction [31 In this book I seek to account for Bataille's and Lacan's formula­ tion of decentered subjectivity as part of a cultural crisis in inter­ war France in which aH the criteria defining what makes a self and what gives it legitimacy were perceived as having dissolved. In the chapters that foHow, I look at the relationship between this self and changing constructions of the other in order to account for what makes the French interwar critiques of the subject-in particular the works of Bataille and Lacan-culturally specific. More pre­ cisely, I try to document the process through which, in France, all psychoanalytic and literary attempts to rescue the self after the Great War led instead to its dissolution, and all attempts to sta­ bilize the self in new theoretical terms reiterated its instability. This approach requires treating ideas as historical practices. Ye t what it means to do so is far from clear. Other scholars have writ­ ten the history of how the decentered self emerged prior to struc­ turalism and poststructuralism in terms of a complex meshing of intellectual influences facilitated by cultural, spiritual crises. Most trace decentering to a general philosophical recognition of the other.5 Beginning in the nineteenth century, philosophers and members of literary movements in particular effected a shift away from a rational or empirical to what might be called an intuitive model of the sources of subjectivity: from seeing as a primary mode of cognition to an emphasis on being which rejects the sup­ posed neutrality or passivity of the observer. Abandoning the pose of the neutral recorder of experience, phi­ losophers, including Edmund Husserl and Henri Bergson, engaged in a common effort to save the self from a world they perceived as 5Jürgen Habermas, Th e Philosophical DiscoUlse ofModemity (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987)¡ Michael Theunissen, Th e Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber (Cambridge: MlT Press, 1984), p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE Roudinesco Review
    by FRED INGLIS Our Dark Side: a history of perversion by Elisabeth Roudinesco Translated by David Macey Polity Press, 188pp ISBN 978-0-7456-4592-6 (hb) 4593-3 (pb) Sex is a subject much discussed in the official literature of French intellectual life. The works of Georges Bataille, Jean Genet, Michel de Certeau, Michel Foucault towering above them all, bear voluble witness to the imperturbable attentiveness with which the grand maitres à penser will calmly analyse the much mentioned unmentionables of carnal knowledge, taking due intellectual pride in counting in such knowledge as part of the natural purview of the inclusively human sciences. The genteel Anglophones can't touch them. Now the masters are joined by a maitresse and one intimately schooled in the mysteries of that Freudian psychoanalysis which is the de rigeur training in inwardness of the Ecoles Normales for whom the outward half of thought is built out of Marx's dark materialism. Elisabeth Roudinesco is, however, far less Olympian an authority than Foucault, not at all a serene determinist of discourse, and less a historian than an exasperated spirit, admonishing on a decidedly grand and unevidenced scale a humankind disfigured by the hideous enormities of the past and rendered irredeemably trivial by the antinomian self-indulgence of the present. Her brief book – too brief, surely, for so giant and extended a topic – starts out by handing conceptual centrality to that elusive, untranslatable and here untranslated word 'jouissance', which has locked in its jewelled depths something of pleasure, of enjoyment, of desire, of voluptuous excess. Whatever it is, it drives perversion and, Roudinesco promises us, we are all perverts, glad with all our hearts to find our indecorum get an airing from Paolo Pasolini, Alfred Hitchcock, or Last Tango in Paris .
    [Show full text]
  • The Argentinean Exception Proves the Rule Patricia Gherovici
    Abstract: Given the huge popularity of psychoanalysis in Argentina, one C R can wonder whether it has replaced politics. Could psychoanalysis have I come to inhabit a space where politics is reduced to its cultural aspect? S The Argentinean I Or has it substituted religion? Rejecting these two theses, I argue that S psychoanalysis is important because of its foundational link to the Law. To show this, I will discuss two recent Argentine films: La Fuga (The & Escape, 2001, Eduardo Mignona) and El secreto de sus ojos (The Secrets Exception Proves C of their Eyes, 2009, Juan Jose Campanella). They will allow me to explore R the complex rapport of Argentinean society with the Law as I suggest that I T psychoanalysis’ popularity is due to it being a symptom of the Law’s void. I the Rule Q Keywords: Psychoanalysis in Argentina, politics, state terror, state of U E exception, Law / Volume 6 / When one thinks of Argentina, psychoanalysis comes to mind as a Issue 1 national symbol as representative as soccer, tango, the disappeared, Patricia Gherovici and the Madres de Plaza de Mayo. One remarkable feature of Argentina is that this system created by Freud managed to develop and flourish under conditions of severely restricted political freedom. Psychoanalysis had an early but limited reception in the beginning of the twentieth century, but later became a serious profession that experienced exponential growth after 1955 as part of a rapid cultural modernization. By the 1960s, a psychoanalytic culture had been solidly established in Argentina. Psychoanalysis was a common language across social classes that appeared in magazines and television shows.1 In the clinical practice, psychoanalysis was increasingly seen as a tool for social change, and Freud was read along with Marx.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Structuralism. Vol. 2
    DJFHKJSD History of Structuralism Volume 2 This page intentionally left blank History of Structuralism Volume 2: The Sign Sets, 1967-Present Francois Dosse Translated by Deborah Glassman University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis London The University of Minnesota Press gratefully acknowledges financial assistance provided by the French Ministry of Culture for the translation of this book. Copyright 1997 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota Originally published as Histoire du structuralisme, 11. Le chant du cygne, de 1967 anos jour«; Copyright Editions La Decouverte, Paris, 1992. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press III Third Avenue South, Suite 290, Minneapolis, MN 554°1-2520 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper http://www.upress.umn.edu First paperback edition, 1998 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dosse, Francois, 1950- [Histoire du structuralisme. English] History of structuralism I Francois Dosse ; translated by Deborah Glassman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Contents: v. 1. The rising sign, 1945-1966-v. 2. The sign sets, 1967-present. ISBN 0-8166-2239-6 (v. I: he: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2241-8 (v. I: pbk. : alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2370-8 (v. 2: hc: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2371-6 (v. 2: pbk. : alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2240-X (set: hc: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2254-X (set: pbk.
    [Show full text]
  • From Or Toward the Symbolic? a Critique of Žižek's the Sublime
    Décalages Manuscript 1022 From or Toward the Symbolic? A Critique of Žižek’s The Sublime Object of Ideology Won Choi This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Occidental College Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Décalages by an authorized administrator of Occidental College Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected] . Choi: From or Toward the Symbolic? From or Toward the Symbolic? A Critique of Žižek’s The Sublime Object of Ideology Won Choi In her biography, Jacques Lacan , Elisabeth Roudinesco o ffers us a sharp contrast between the positions occupied by Louis Althusser and Jacques Lacan as follows: “Lacan . had traveled in the opposite direction from Althusser. Hence his constantly renewed attachment to Lévi-Strauss’s idea of symbolic function. While Althusser believed that only by escaping from all filial symbolism could one achieve a founding act, Lacan showed that, on the contrary, while such an escape might indeed produce logical discourse, such discourse would be invaded by psychosis” (Roudinesco 1997, pp. 301-2). Many readers today may be dumbfounded by this passage, since the picture presented here about the two theorists is diametrically opposed to the picture they tend to hold true. In the latter picture, Althusser is depicted as an adamant structuralist who disallowed the subject any chance to escape from the dominant ideology, while Lacan is portrayed as a genuine critic of such a position, who, by stressing the irreducible dimension of the real, showed how the subject might be able to find a way to subvert the entire symbolic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Elisabeth Roudinesco, Self-Plagiarist
    Translated by Philip Dravers Elisabeth Roudinesco, Self-Plagiarist Nathalie Jaudel “With these Écrits I needed to erect a barrier against the covetousness, now set in motion, of forgers always ready to serve under the banner of the intellectual spirit” Jacques Lacan, “Discourse at the ORTF” Elisabeth Roudinesco loves Lacan. She loves him “In spite of everything”, as Charlene Wittstock loves Prince Albert of Monaco.1 As she declares as early as the epigraph of her last work, she loves him in spite of the fact that he was a “clown” who readily assumed that role.2 She loves him in spite of his “excesses” (LECT, p.13), his “mania for neologisms” (LECT, p.13), his “attacks of rage and pique, his hermeticism (LECT, p.26), his unacknowledged conceptual borrowing (LECT, p. 31), his “cult of not keeping records” paradoxically correlated with an obsession for leaving a trace for posterity (LECT, p.66-67), his “having lost sight, over the years, of the confrontational essence of dialogue” (LECT, p.86) unless it was simply a question of his innate “inability (…) to hold a dialogue with anyone”, his blunders (LECT, p.86), his resemblance to Charcot‟s hysterics (LECT, p.74), his submission, “beyond what was reasonable, to the ritual of patient presentations” (LECT, p.21), his extravagant shirts (LECT, p.74), his adoration for the One Hundred and Twenty Days of Sodom (LECT, p.119), his transgressions (LECT, p.171), his “jealousy” and his “rather ridiculous allusions” (LECT, p.162) and the risk he took of “becoming one of the henchmen of obscurantism and anti- enlightenment thought” (LECT, p.20).
    [Show full text]
  • Ljst 12 Syllabus
    Professor Adam Sitze Email: [email protected] Office: Clark 204 Phone: x2021 Office Hours: Friday, 1PM-5PM LJST 12: Psychoanalysis and Law This purpose of this course is to provide an introduction to psychoanalysis as a comprehensive theory of law. Although psychoanalysis has not traditionally been considered an integral part of the discipline of legal theory, its insights into the origin and structure of law are at once intriguing and disturbing, and its response to the basic question of jurisprudence—“what is law?”—permits us to refer with clarity and precision to an experience of law about which we would otherwise have to remain silent. Freud teaches that law is an institution that at once emerges from and recoils upon our most quotidian and intimate experiences of desire—love and aggression, sublimation and art, language and fantasy, perversion and wit, jealousy and forgetfulness, conscience and paranoia, obedience and transgression, gender and sexuality, anxiety and infancy—and he provides us with a set of interpretive terms and techniques that help us grasp this teaching. Our inquiry into psychoanalysis and law will be divided into three parts. After (a) studying the account of law offered by Freudian psychoanalysis, and (b) considering the way in which certain juridical experiences and events are prior to and generative of Freudian psychoanalysis, we will then (c) explore the ways that various scholars have applied, modified, and critiqued psychoanalytic concepts in their understanding of law. In addition to reading Freud’s Five Lectures on Psychoanalysis, The Question of Lay Analysis, Totem and Taboo, Civilization and its Discontents, Moses and Monotheism, and Lacan’s Seminar VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, we will thus also read works by such thinkers as Alain Badiou, Judith Butler, Frantz Fanon, Carlo Galli, Bonnie Honig, Pierre Legendre, Julia Kristeva, Juliett Mitchell, Jacqueline Rose, Edward Said, and Slavoj Žižek.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Esprit Français from the Mid-1910S to the End of the 1930S: Three Episodes1 Tomoko SATO2 I Am Honored to Particip
    “Deviating with Freud: Discussions with George Makari” 21 March 2019, Seikei University (Tokyo) Revolution in esprit français from the mid-1910s to the end of the 1930s: Three episodes1 Tomoko SATO2 I am honored to participate in the workshop on Professor George Makari’s book, Revolution in Mind (RM)3. I thank Professor Endo for giving me this opportunity. Today, I would like to discuss the “Revolution in esprit français from the 1910s to the 1930s.” The “esprit français” means the “French spirit” or “French mind.” My talk is directly inspired by Makari’s book, which consists of three parts, including “Part One: Making Freudian Theory,” “Part Two: Making the Freudians,” and “Part Three: Making Psychoanalysis.” While all three parts are quite informative and interesting, Part Three in particular caught my attention the most since it puts different events, which occurred from the mid-1910s to the end of the 1930s, in the same perspective. Indeed, this periodization allowed the author to clearly define what is at stake for the development of the psychoanalytic movement. This persuasively demonstrated how this movement, carried by Freudians, came to spread with those whom we should call psychoanalysts, rather than Freudians, to the Western world. Taking a cue from Makari’s successful demonstration, I propose examining three cases, which took place during the same period in France, in the context of chauvinistic resistance to psychoanalysis and their decline. Through this brief examination, I will attempt to respond, though indirectly, to the invitation written in the announcement of this workshop, for “re-historicization and re-evaluation of psychoanalysis as a radical ‘anti-psychology’—a persistent and daring resistance to modern institutionalizations of the human ‘mind’—in British, French, American, and Central-European contexts.” I Freud’s theoretical shifts as factors for openness Let us recall some remarks formulated in Part Three of the Revolution in Mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing One's Heritage
    Choosing One’s Heritage Elisabeth Roudinesco: I would like first of all to evoke the past, our common history. It has become respectable today to express disapproval of the thinkers of the 1970 s and to demand a “necessary accounting” or, even worse, a “repentance” from those who claim them as an inspiration. The works of the period, marked as they are by very peculiar intersections with “structuralism,” are the targets of an incoherent jumble of reproaches: they excessively valorize the spirit of revolt; they indulge in the cult of aestheti­ cism; they are too attached to a certain linguistic formalism; they reject democratic freedoms; and they are profoundly skeptical of humanism. I think this ostracism is utterly sterile; it seems better to approach our age in a completely different way, one that involves, in your words, “choosing ones heritage”:1 neither accepting everything nor erasing everything. You are the heir to the major works of the second half of the century. A number of these came out of systems of thought that are being chal­ lenged today. You have “deconstructed”2 these works, notably those of Claude Levi-Strauss, Michel Foucault, Louis Althusser, and Jacques La­ can.3 During their lifetimes, and taking their works as your starting point, you “explicated” yourself (you like this verb) in relation to them; you en­ gaged in a work of textual commentary, while also insisting on the impor­ tance, for your own teaching practices, of Edmund Husserl, Martin Hei­ degger, and Emmanuel Levinas. It was at that time, around 1967, that I began reading your works, es­ pecially O f Grammatology and Writing and Difference,4 as did all the stu- 2 Choosing One’s Heritage dents of literature of my generation interested in avant-garde literature and in the structural linguistics coming out of the work of Ferdinand de Saus- sure and Roman Jakobson.
    [Show full text]
  • September-2006
    SeptemberJune 2006 2006 Clio’s Psyche Page 81 Clio’s Psyche Understanding the "Why" of Culture, Current Events, History, and Society Volume 13 Issue 2 September 2006 John Forrester: A Cambridge Suffer the Children: Children Historian of Psychoanalysis in the Early Christian Centuries Paul H. Elovitz Daniel Dervin The Psychohistory Forum Mary Washington University John Forrester was born on August 25, 1949 Through late Antiquity, as Christianity in London, England to working class parents reconfigured the Roman Empire, abandonment of transformed by education into the professional children, mostly through exposure, remained a classes. He received a B.A. with honors in the common practice, though officially condemned by Natural Sciences Tripos, specializing in the history the fourth century. Survivors of these practices likely and philosophy of science, from the University of entered the “slave populations” (Harris, pp. 1-22). Cambridge (1970). While on a Fulbright Scholar- Most families abandoned at least one of their ship he studied for eighteen months in the Program offspring, according to Boswell (pp. 135, 163-9), in the History of Science at Princeton University and who estimates abandonment rates between 20 percent he was elected a Junior Research Fellow at King’s and 40 percent. Accordingly, most psychohistorians College, Cambridge on the basis of his Fellowship agree with Lloyd deMause’s designating parenting in Dissertation “Language and Symbol in Freud’s this period as the Abandonment Mode of childrearing Psychoanalysis” (1975). Forrester received his (deMause, 1982, pp. 30-6). Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 1979. He Conversely, it has been pointed out that a was Senior Research Fellow at King’s College from majority of these children were wanted or at least 1980-84, when he was appointed to a position at the accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex, Gender, Sexuality I Professor Amy Hollywood
    Sex, Gender, Sexuality I Professor Amy Hollywood Fall 2019 Location: 60 Oxford Street 119 Mondays from 3-5 PM Professor Hollywood’s Office Hours: Tuesdays 1-3 and other times if needed Contact Andrea Davies to set up appointments [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Siobhan Kelly (Email: [email protected]) Teaching Fellow Office Hours: Mondays 12-2 and other times if needed Books available for purchase (all readings will be available on Canvas): Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (the Parshley translation, Vintage edition) Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure Sigmund Freud, Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (Strachey translation) Jacques Lacan and the École freudienne, Feminine Sexuality Course Requirements: 1. Attendance and participation in class. Please read materials carefully before we meet and be ready to discuss them. In the course schedule below, primary texts appear in bold and should be the focus of your attention. Careful reading of at least some portion of the secondary literature, however, is also essential to the success of the course. 2. Three short (5-6 pages, typed and double-spaced) exegetical papers or, with permission of the instructor or TF, one short exegetical paper and one longer (10-15 pages, typed and double-spaced) paper. This assignment will be discussed further in class. The first paper will be due on Friday, October 4th by midnight. The second paper will be due on Friday, November 8th by midnight. The final paper or the longer paper will be due on Monday, December 9th by midnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Lacan's Année Érotique Jean-Michel Rabaté
    PARRHESIA NUMBER 6 • 2009 • 28-45 68 + 1: LACAN'S ANNÉE ÉROTIQUE Jean-Michel Rabaté Gainsbourg et son Gainsborough Vont rejoindre Paris Ils ont laissé derrière eux La Tamise et Chelsea Ils s’aiment et la traversée Durera toute une année Et que les dieux les bénissent Jusqu’en soixante-dix Soixant’neuf année érotique Soixant’neuf année érotique In a presentation on “Identity in a time of loneliness” at a recent Lacanian conference on the topic of “Love” (Philadelphia, 03/29/2008), the Belgian theoretician of Lacanian psychoanalysis and clinician Paul Verhaeghe cited documentaries on May '68 as signs of a huge change that he saw in our perception not only of mentalities but of bodies. These were his terms: Recently a famous television documentary, In Europe, by Geert Mak, showed us images of the previous century, e.g., of the student protests in the late sixties. Even in color, the black, grey and white dominate. We have to assume that the marching men are in their early twenties, but they all look much older. Moreover, they don’t seem very healthy and their body shapes are not very appealing either. This comes as no surprise, as their main sporting activity came down to debating evenings with lots of cigarettes and alcohol. Their identity was based on the position provided by their studies in combination with the fact that they belonged to a number of other classic groups as well. Half a century later, this has completely changed. The majority of the students are female, colour is everywhere and almost everybody (professors included) is following a fitness program.
    [Show full text]
  • LJST%20212%20Syllabus
    Professor Adam Sitze Email: [email protected] Office: Clark 204 Phone: x2021 Office Hours: Friday, 11:30AM-3:30PM LJST 212: Psychoanalysis and Law Although psychoanalysis is not usually considered a part of the discipline of jurisprudence, its theories allow for comprehensive answers to the fundamental questions of jurisprudence, and its lexicon permits us to refer with clarity and precision to realities of juridical experience about which disciplinary jurisprudence remains silent. Psychoanalysis interprets law within a field defined by the vicissitudes and impasses of unconscious desire, giving us a way to speak about the pathologies that are constitutive of law’s normal operation, and this amounts, in effect if not in name, to a jurisprudence as compelling as it is unorthodox. At the same time, however, psychoanalysis also has been constrained, at key points in its history, by some of the very juridical forms and forces it seeks to analyze and to question, sometimes even to the point where those forms and forces have reappeared, internalized, within its own most basic theories and practices. If psychoanalysis allows for a comprehensive theory of law, so too then can law serve as an exemplary point of departure for the rethinking of psychoanalysis itself. The purpose of this course will be to pursue this twofold inquiry. After tracing the way that law emerges as a question within the thinking of Sigmund Freud, and considering the ways in which certain juridical problems and events are prior to and generative of Freud’s thought, we then will explore the various ways in which post-Freudian thinkers have not only applied but also rethought Freudian psychoanalysis in their own studies of law.
    [Show full text]