Species Composition and Spatiotemporal Pattern of the Seed Bank and Vegetation in Native and Degraded Florida Rosemary Scrub
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SPECIES COMPOSITION AND SPATIOTEMPORAL PATTERN OF THE SEED BANK AND VEGETATION IN NATIVE AND DEGRADED FLORIDA ROSEMARY SCRUB by JENNIFER J. NAVARRA B.A. University of Central Florida, 2005 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in the Department of Biology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2010 Major Professor: Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio ABSTRACT The soil seed bank plays a dynamic role in the regeneration of plant communities after natural and anthropogenic disturbance. In this thesis, I addressed how disturbances influence the vegetation and seed bank of Florida rosemary scrub. In Chapter One I evaluated changes in species composition and spatiotemporal pattern of the vegetation and seed bank along a gradient of disturbance. During the summers and winters of 2007-2009 percent ground cover and seed bank species composition were assessed among replicates of three vegetation types subjected to minimal, moderate, and extreme anthropogenic disturbance (native rosemary scrub, degraded scrub, and agriculturally improved pasture, respectively). These vegetation types shared the same soil and topographic characteristics but differed in disturbance history. I found that species composition and spatial pattern varied with disturbance. In pastures the compositional and structural characteristics of rosemary scrub were lost and only native scrub species able to evade herbivory persisted in this community. Native and degraded scrub differed most from each other in species abundances and spatial pattern. Degraded scrub showed highest abundance of subshrubs and a spike moss species, while rosemary scrub was dominated by shrubs. The seed banks of scrub herbs in degraded scrub had a tendency towards a random spatial distribution that lacked association with aboveground cover. Conversely, rosemary scrub seed banks tended to have an aggregated distribution and were associated with occurrence of conspecific species aboveground, litter, and shrub cover. These results indicated a change in the spatial heterogeneity of the seed banks of scrub herbs in degraded scrub. In Chapter Two I evaluated changes in seed bank density with time-since-fire in native rosemary scrub. Due to large pulses of recruitment immediately after fire and population decline ii with time-since-fire, I predicted seed density with time-since-fire would follow a unimodal function with low density in early and late years post-fire, and highest density at intermediate time-since-fire. I compared seed density data among sites with different time-since-fire: two sites each of three, six, ten and 24 years time-since-fire and three long-unburned sites (> 24 years). Variability in seed bank composition and density increased with time-since-fire and only recently burned stands were distinctly different from the other time-since-fire age classes. Some species and functional groups did exhibit a quadratic or cubic association to time-since-fire (ruderal herbs, subshrubs, Ceratiola ericoides, Lechea cernua, Paronychia chartacea, Phyllanthus tenellus); however, timing of the peak in seed density varied depending on life span and age of reproductive maturity. Scrub herbs were the most abundant functional group in the seed bank and showed highest density in the first ten years post-fire. This pattern corresponds to the pattern of aboveground species abundance and suggests abundances above- and belowground are closely linked. Understanding the dynamics of the seed bank in both naturally and anthropogenically disturbed communities in Florida rosemary scrub is important for the restoration of scrub habitat and management of existing populations of endangered and threatened scrub species endemic to the Lake Wales Ridge in central Florida. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio, Eric S. Menges, Carl Weekley, Beth Stephens, David Jenkins, and John Weishampel for providing advice on this project. For help with field and sample preparation I thank the Archbold Biological Station high school research assistants, Jorge Garcia, Beth Stephens, Eva Navarra, Amarantha Z. Quintana-Morales, Eréndira M. Quintana-Morales, Luz M. Castro-Morales, Mario A. Camchong and Holly McArdle. James Angelo assisted with statistical analysis and Roberta Pickert helped with GIS. Beth Stephen, Lina M. Sánchez-Clavijo, and Jorge Garcia helped with editing. Funding for this project was provided by Archbold Biological Station, the Garden Club of America, and the Florida Division of Forestry. My deepest thanks go to Archbold Biological Station who provided logistical support and the UCF Arboretum team coordinated by Alaina Bernard who managed the greenhouses used for this project. I also would like to thank Nancy Kohfeldt and Eric Menges for permitting the use of their data in Chapter Two. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 6 Study Site ............................................................................................................................ 6 Aboveground Cover Sampling ........................................................................................... 8 Seed Bank Sampling ........................................................................................................... 9 Greenhouse Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 9 Data Analysis .................................................................................................................... 10 Results ................................................................................................................................... 12 Species Composition ......................................................................................................... 12 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................... 12 Seed Bank ..................................................................................................................... 14 Spatial Structure ................................................................................................................ 15 Ground cover ................................................................................................................ 15 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................... 15 Seed Bank ..................................................................................................................... 17 Temporal Pattern ............................................................................................................... 18 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................... 18 v Seed bank ...................................................................................................................... 18 Relationship Above- and Belowground ............................................................................ 19 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 20 Species Composition ......................................................................................................... 21 Spatial Structure ................................................................................................................ 26 Broader Implications ......................................................................................................... 29 Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 47 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 48 Methods ................................................................................................................................. 50 Study Site .......................................................................................................................... 50 Seed Bank Sampling ......................................................................................................... 51 Field Sampling .............................................................................................................. 51 Greenhouse Monitoring ................................................................................................ 52 Assessing long-term persistence ................................................................................... 53 Data Analysis .................................................................................................................... 54 Results ................................................................................................................................... 55 Species composition.......................................................................................................... 55 Species Richness