DOCSLIB.ORG

Love That Grows Stronger and Becomes More Christ-Like Every Day

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Love That Grows Stronger and Becomes More Christ-Like Every Day Love that grows Stronger and becomes More Christ-Like Every Day Scripture Related to God’s Love By: Bernardine Gibbs Opening Prayer By: William Mahoney Lesson Scripture Foundation 1st Thessalonians 3:12 And may the Lord make your love for one another and for all people grow and overflow, just as our love for you overflows. Background Generally new believers have questions about their new faith. Paul new this so he sent Timothy back to Thessalonica shortly after establishing the church there to report on how the young church was doing. Timothy returned with considerable questions posed by the new converts. Consequently, Paul addressed their question in 1st Thessalonians, by reinforcing the basic gospel message, instructing them further in the faith and providing practical applications for spiritual truth. Historically- Thessalonica was one of the first cities evangelized by Paul and Silas on the continent of Europe. They were invited by a man with a vision (Acts 16:9,10) from Macedonia to preach the gospel in the area. Because of its location Thessalonica became the primary base for the spread of the gospel in Macedonia and Greece. Paul had considerable success, not only among the Jews but also among the god-fearing Greeks. However, some Jews rejected Paul’s message and they were 1 envious of his successes, subsequently, they hired thugs to attack him and spread negative rumors on the integrity and intent of his ministry. As a result, Paul fled to Berea, where they had a good reception, yet Paul longed for the converts in Thessalonica. Such is the impetus for writing 1st Thessalonians. Paul’s Message and Purpose to the Thessalonians To encourage the church by emphasizing their faith. Paul warned the congregation of their coming affliction. He focused on the scripture that teaches them “who live godly lives” to expect persecution (2 Tim 3:12). Suffering from persecution should not cause them to be downcast; instead they should rejoice that they have been considered worthy of sharing in Christ’s suffering (Matt 5:10-12). Paul had a concern that the Thessalonians might succumb to the temptation of Satan and forsake the Christian Faith; that concern was put to rest when Timothy reported that the Thessalonians stood fast to their faithfulness to Christ. Through his separation Paul developed a strong desire to see the Thessalonians not only to satisfy his own love and emotion but to perfect or complete their own faith, realizing that there is always room for improvement. Paul noted that the Thessalonian’s endurance under persecution demonstrated the growth of their faith; however, Paul wanted them to mature in it. Christ told his disciples that His followers would be identified by their love for one another (John 13:35). In keeping with that mark of identification, Paul prayed that the Thessalonians would love each other more and more, emphasizing that he desired that the hearts of 2 the Thessalonians would become blameless in holiness not only before people but also before God. Significance This brings us to our lesson today that focuses on the fundamental tenets of the varying characteristics of Love as espoused by the Greeks. The Thessalonian believers already had a good record of loving one another, but Paul wanted that love to increase more and more as commanded by Jesus (John 13:34), which is an important basis of evangelism. In a world that is filled with self-serving individuals it becomes imperative that the genuine love of Christians should attract others to the faith which is the major thesis of missionary work! Let’s discuss and evaluate the various types of love according to the Greeks to arrive at the love Jesus speaks. Eros Love Biblical Significance of Eros Eros is used in the Old Testament to express the physical and sensual intimacy between a husband and a wife. Because God deliberately uses the relationship of marriage as an illustration of the relationship he has with his people, using the Bible, as his love letter it illustrates this love with its varying intensity and the beauty of the relationship that exists between God and those who believe in him. God loves us as a Bridegroom, as “a lover with all the passion of a true love,” he says. Within the boundary of marriage, Eros love is to be celebrated. One example of this beautiful imagery is found in the Song of Solomon. 3 Small Nugget #1: Give us an example of Eros love in your life Alice Evans Yura Wright Linard Bethune Storge love in the Bible Storge (pronounced stor-JAY) is a Greek word that is used in Christianity to mean family love, the bond among mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, sisters, and brothers. Examples of Storge in the Scriptures Many examples of family love are found in Scripture, such as the love and mutual protection among Noah and his wife, their sons, and daughters-in-law in Genesis; the love of Jacob for his sons; and the strong love the sisters Martha and Mary in the gospels had for their brother Lazarus. The family was a vital part of ancient Jewish culture. In the Ten Commandments, God charges his people to: Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land the LORD your God is giving you. (Exodus 20:12, NIV) When we become followers of Jesus Christ, we enter into the family of God. Our lives are bound together by something stronger than physical ties—the bonds of the Spirit. We are related by something more powerful than human blood—the blood of Jesus Christ. God calls his family to love one another with the deep affection of storge. Small Nugget #2: How has Storge love affected your life? Angelia Smith 4 Bernardine Gibbs Phileo Love Philia means close friendship or brotherly love in Greek. It is one of the four types of love in the Bible. St. Augustine, Bishop of Hippo (354–430 AD), understood this form of love to describe a love of equals who are united in a common purpose, pursuit, good, or end. Thus, philia refers to love based on mutual respect, shared devotion, joint interests, and common values. It is the love near and dear friends have for one another. Philia Meaning Philia (pronounced FILL-ee-uh) conveys a strong feeling of attraction. It is the most general form of love in the Bible, encompassing love for fellow humans, care, respect, and compassion for people in need. For example, philia describes the benevolent, kindly love. The most common form of philia is close friendship. Philia and other forms of this Greek noun are found throughout the New Testament. Christians are frequently exhorted to love their fellow Christians. Philadelphia (brotherly love) appears a handful of times, and philia (friendship) appears once in James: According to Strong's Concordance, the Greek verb philéō is closely related to the noun philia. It means "to show warm affection in an intimate friendship." It is characterized by tender, heartfelt consideration and kinship. Both philia and phileo originate from the Greek term phílos, a noun meaning "beloved, dear ... a friend; someone dearly loved (prized) in a personal, intimate way; a trusted confidant held dear in a close bond of personal affection." Philos expresses experience-based love. 5 Philia Love in the Bible Is a Family Word Love one another with brotherly affection. Outdo one another in showing honor. (Romans 12:10 ESV) Now concerning brotherly love, you have no need for anyone to write to you, for you yourselves have been taught by God to love one another... (1 Thessalonians 4:9, ESV) (c ) Let brotherly love continue. (Hebrews 13:1, ESV) And godliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love. (2 Peter 1:7, ESV) Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart ... (1 Peter 1:22, ESV) Finally, all of you, have unity of mind, sympathy, brotherly love, a tender heart, and a humble mind. (1 Peter 3:8, ESV) Small Nugget #3: How has Phileo love enriched your life? Sharhonda Johnson Paul Stephens Glen Robinson Agape love Agape could be defined as charity. However, we often think of charity nowadays as giving away money or things, which doesn’t encompass all of what agape is about. Agape love is unconcerned with the self and concerned with the greatest good of another. Agape isn’t born just out of emotions, feelings, familiarity, or attraction, but from the will and as a choice. Agape requires faithfulness, commitment, and sacrifice without expecting anything in return. 6 This is the type of love the Bible speaks about the most. The New Testament references agape over 200 times. Agape love, in the Bible, is love that comes from God. God’s love isn’t sentimental; it’s part of His character. God loves from an outpouring of who He is. As 1 John 4:8 states, “God is love [agapos],” meaning He is the source of agape love. His love is undeserved, gracious, and sacrificial. We are to love God and others with agape love. Agape is a choice, a deliberate striving for another’s highest good, and is demonstrated through action. God set the standard for agape love in sending Jesus to die for us while we were still sinners. Agape Love Examples Matthew 22:37-39, also known as “The Greatest Commandments,” instructs us to agapao God and our neighbors, while Matthew 5:43-46 instructs us to even agapao our enemies. However, a person can also agape or wholeheartedly love the wrong things.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aristotle on Love and Friendship
    ARISTOTLE ON LOVE AND FRIENDSHIP DAVID KONSTAN Philia is exceptional among ancient Greek value terms for the number of still unre- solved, or at least intensely debated, questions that go to the heart of its very nature.1 Does it mean “friendship”, as it is most commonly rendered in discussions of Aris- totle, or rather “love”, as seems more appropriate in some contexts? Whether it is love, friendship, or something else, is it an emotion, a virtue, or a disposition? The same penumbra of ambiguity surrounds the related term philos, often rendered as “friend” but held by some to include kin and other relations, and even to refer chiefly to them. Thus, Elizabeth Belfiore affirms that “the noun philos surely has the same range as philia, and both refer primarily, if not exclusively, to relationships among close blood kin” (2000: 20). In respect to the affective character of philia, Michael Peachin (2001: 135 n. 2) describes “the standard modern view of Roman friendship” as one “that tends to reduce significantly the emotional aspect of the relationship among the Ro- mans, and to make of it a rather pragmatic business”, and he holds the same to be true of Greek friendship or philia. Scholars at the other extreme maintain that ancient friendship was based essentially on affection. As Peachin remarks (ibid., p. 7), “D. Konstan [1997] has recently argued against the majority opinion and has tried to inject more (modern-style?) emotion into ancient amicitia”. Some critics, in turn, have sought a compromise between the two positions, according to which ancient friend- ship involved both an affective component and the expectation of practical services.
    [Show full text]
  • Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler a Dissertati
    Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2018 Reading Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Chair Ann Anagnost Stevan Harrell Danny Hoffman Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Anthropology ©Copyright 2018 Darren T. Byler University of Washington Abstract Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Department of Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies This study argues that Uyghurs, a Turkic-Muslim group in contemporary Northwest China, and the city of Ürümchi have become the object of what the study names “terror capitalism.” This argument is supported by evidence of both the way state-directed economic investment and security infrastructures (pass-book systems, webs of technological surveillance, urban cleansing processes and mass internment camps) have shaped self-representation among Uyghur migrants and Han settlers in the city. It analyzes these human engineering and urban planning projects and the way their effects are contested in new media, film, television, photography and literature. It finds that this form of capitalist production utilizes the discourse of terror to justify state investment in a wide array of policing and social engineering systems that employs millions of state security workers. The project also presents a theoretical model for understanding how Uyghurs use cultural production to both build and refuse the development of this new economic formation and accompanying forms of gendered, ethno-racial violence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2013 The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle Robin Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Robin, "The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 143. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STOICS AND THE PRACTICAL: A ROMAN REPLY TO ARISTOTLE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 BY Robin Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Introduction……………………..............................................................................................................p.i Chapter One: Practical Knowledge and its Others Technê and Natural Philosophy…………………………….....……..……………………………….....p. 1 Virtue and technical expertise conflated – subsequently distinguished in Plato – ethical knowledge contrasted with that of nature in
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Eros: Friendship in the Phaedrus
    DRAFT Beyond eros: Friendship in the Phaedrus Plato is often held to be the first great theoriser of love in the Western tradition, and yet his account has been taken to be a resounding failure by many, if not most, modern scholars working on this topic. Criticisms have been articulated forcefully by Vlastos whose seminal paper „The Individual as an Object of love‟ charged Plato with „cold-hearted egoism‟; his account, he argued, disdained persons in favour of abstract, conceptual, objects – the so-called Platonic Forms, and advocates a „spiritualized egocentrism…scarcely aware of kindness, tenderness, compassion, concern for the freedom, respect for the integrity of the beloved, as essential ingredients of the highest type of interpersonal love‟ (Vlastos (1981/2000: 642)). The evidence is roughly as follows. In the Symposium Plato argues that the highest form of eros, roughly, „passionate desire‟ is love for Forms, and beautiful bodies and souls are to be used „as steps‟ towards this end. The Lysis appears to be the only exploration of friendship (philia), and this is an inconclusive work. At best, it is held, the lack of an account of love and friendship for persons compares unfavourably with Aristotle‟s detailed account of philia, which occupies two books of his Ethics and is, arguably, central to his account of human flourishing; at worst, this omission supports the view of Plato as „a cold-hearted egoist‟ who disdained persons in favour of abstract objects. If Plato thought philosophy could answer the question how should one live, in one crucial area of his thought the life worth living is not, apparently, a life worth choosing; as Aristotle made explicit, no one would choose to live without friends.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. LETTER to PADMAJA NAIDU September 5, 1932 MY DEAR PADMAJA, Your Basket of Oranges Again! Seeing That You Will Insist on Sending Them No Matter What I Say
    1. LETTER TO PADMAJA NAIDU September 5, 1932 MY DEAR PADMAJA, Your basket of oranges again! Seeing that you will insist on sending them no matter what I say. let me tell you that they are really a good variety—very juicy. You have responded to the gentle driving by the poor little slave-driver. Even I could decipher your letter without difficulty. But I do not want you, please, to exert yourself when you are lying flat on your back. Any abomination will do. Even the abominations of loved ones are preferable to their silence. But when you are really ill, why not get some willing assistance? Anybody will gladly write to your dictation. Your mention of that magnificent story of the Buddha brings to mind many sacred things. Yes, I do dream many dreams. All may not be airy nothings or I would be crushed under the weight of the love I appropriate from people of all sorts and conditions—men, women, boys and girls.1 Sardar and Mahadev have more books than they can cope with. The former is absorbed like a diligent student in his Sanskrit studies; the latter in his French and Urdu thanks all the same on their behalf for your offer. It is no use, I fear, your wanting to see them. I wish it was possible. Love from us all. Yours, SLAVE-DRIVER SHRIMATI PADMAJA NAIDU C/O SERVANTS OF INDIA SOCIETY POONA CITY From the origin al: Padmaj a Naidu Papers . Courte sy: Nehru Memori al Museum and Librar y 1 This paragraph has already been reproduced in “Letter to Padmaja Naidu”, 5-9-1932.
    [Show full text]
  • On Perfect Friendship: an Outline and a Guide to Aristotle's Philosophy of Friendship
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2010 On Perfect Friendship: An Outline and a Guide to Aristotle's Philosophy of Friendship Kristen Psaty Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, and the Other Philosophy Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Psaty, Kristen, "On Perfect Friendship: An Outline and a Guide to Aristotle's Philosophy of Friendship" (2010). Honors Theses. Paper 589. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/589 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. ON PERFECT FRIENDSHIP: An Outline and a Guide to Aristotle’s Philosophy of Friendship By Kristen Psaty Honors Thesis Philosophy Department © 2010 1 For Megan The one who brings out the best in me. To Kyle My other self . & to the ∆ΠΠ 2 “This has always been a man's world, and none of the reasons that have been offered in explanation have seemed adequate.” -Simone de Beauvoir Special Thanks to Lydia Moland, Valerie Dionne, Holly Moore and Thanks also to readers Amy Holmen and Elise Breed. 3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………. 6 CHAPTER I. ……………………………………………………. 13 An Introduction to Aristotle on Friendship CHAPTER II.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbert and Elinor Nootbaar Institute on Law, Religion and Ethics Annual Conference Love and Law Proposal Title: “Why Agape I
    Herbert and Elinor Nootbaar Institute on Law, Religion and Ethics Annual Conference Love and Law Proposal Title: “Why Agape is Not More ‘Christian’ than Eros and Philia” Abstract: By drawing on various works in Christian theology and moral philosophy, this paper examines the Christian ethicist’s dangerously elevated view of agape. As Stephen Post observes, the tendency in Christian circles has been to “identify all family ties with nepotism, all erotic desire with sin, all self-love with unbound egocentrism, or all friendship with mercenary instrumentalism.” The result is nothing more than an impoverished love ethic. In fact, contrary to common perception, the biblical authors do not share our narrow preoccupation with agape. Rather, it speaks with a consistent appreciation of eros and philia as well. And if we look at what many believe to be the ultimate revelation of God – the Christ event – we see that the love expressed here is not exclusively agapic in nature. It would be a tragic mistake, then, to view eros and philia as inferior forms of love. Moreover, I argue that while agape rightly prizes benevolence and a person’s regard for another person, its true power lies in its mutuality. In other words, one’s obligations, affections, and faithfulness to another, not to mention the “concrete decencies” we expect from one another, are simply inseparable from the benevolent core of agape. As such, it is not only a mistake to privilege agape over eros and philia; it is just as wrong to see agape as purely distinct from eros and philia. The reality is that self- love and other-regarding love have to work together.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters Before Letters Ewen Bowie the Genre of 'Epistle'/'Letter', Including Its
    Letters before letters Ewen Bowie The genre of ‘epistle’/’letter’, including its species ‘love letter’, was developed and depended upon a world that had access to writing. Was the notion of communication of ideas to a remote audience therefore foreign to a pre-literate Greek society? Several poems surviving from the archaic period, when Greek culture was moving from an oral to an oral-cum-literate stage, show that it was not. Just as a king or community might arrange for a messenger to memorise a message and deliver it to a chosen recipient, so too a poet could have a friend or associate memorise a poem or, in most cases, a song, and sing that to an audience remote from the poet himself or herself. Our clearest case is Alcaeus fr. 428, where we have two testimonia, Herodotus 5.94-5 and Strabo 13.1.38 (600), who present complementary data, and surely both had access to and drew on Alcaeus’ poem, most of which is lost to us. It seems that the poem was addressed to Melanippus (also the addressee of the meta-sympotic fr. 38A), and asked him to act as a herald (kēryx) to carry to Mytilene the news of Alcaeus’ loss of his armour to the Athenians. Not, therefore, a remote immediate addressee: but Alcaeus envisages two audiences, Melanippus, and doubtless other hetairoi, in the hic et nunc in the Troad, and then other, remote Mytileneans back home. That Alcaeus presented himself giving instructions to Melanippus underlines the expectation that this song will be sung in Mytilene, but of course the move is one Alcaeus can make because he knows that sympotic songs of all sorts travel from one part of the Greek world to another, carried by singing symposiasts who learn a song that they like, whether for its tune, its words or its message, and then sing it at another symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Revision of Platonic Erōs and Philia A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M University EMBRACING THE HALF: ARISTOTLE’S REVISION OF PLATONIC ERŌS AND PHILIA A Thesis by EMIL SALIM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2006 Major Subject: Philosophy EMBRACING THE HALF: ARISTOTLE’S REVISION OF PLATONIC ERŌS AND PHILIA A Thesis by EMIL SALIM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Robin Smith Committee Members, Scott Austin Craig Kallendorf Head of Department, Robin Smith May 2006 Major Subject: Philosophy iii ABSTRACT Embracing the Half: Aristotle’s Revision of Platonic Erōs and Philia. (May 2006) Emil Salim, B.A., Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia; M.Div., Evangelical Reformed Theological Seminary, Indonesia Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Robin Smith In this thesis, I am investigating the nature of e[rwV (erōs) and filiva (philia) in Plato and Aristotle. I have confined this project to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (EN) and Metaphysics, with a background discussion of Plato’s Symposium and Phaedrus. I will argue for the following claims. First, Plato’s Symposium poses a dilemma with respect to the object and nature of e[rwV. The dilemma is that the objects of e[rwV must be either particular individuals or the Beautiful itself. Second, Plato’s Phaedrus may be seen as Plato’s attempt to solve the dilemma by giving a synthesis: e[rwV is a virtuous maniva and should be directed to particular individuals en route to the Beautiful.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Solidarity in Anarchist Thought
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository The Concept of Solidarity in Anarchist Thought by John Nightingale A Doctoral Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy Loughborough University September 2015 © John Nightingale 2015 Abstract This thesis makes an original contribution to knowledge by presenting an analysis of anarchist conceptions of solidarity. Whilst recent academic literature has conceptualised solidarity from a range of perspectives, anarchist interpretations have largely been marginalised or ignored. This neglect is unjustified, for thinkers of the anarchist tradition have often emphasised solidarity as a key principle, and have offered original and instructive accounts of this important but contested political concept. In a global era which has seen the role of the nation state significantly reduced, anarchism, which consists in a fundamental critique and rejection of hierarchical state-like institutions, can provide a rich source of theory on the meaning and significance of solidarity. The work consists in detailed analyses of the concepts of solidarity of four prominent anarchist thinkers: Michael Bakunin, Peter Kropotkin, Murray Bookchin and Noam Chomsky. The analytic investigation is led by Michael Freeden’s methodology of ‘ideological morphology’, whereby ideologies are viewed as peculiar configurations of political concepts, which are themselves constituted by sub-conceptual idea- components. Working within this framework, the analysis seeks to ascertain the way in which each thinker attaches particular meanings to the concept of solidarity, and to locate solidarity within their wider ideological system. Subsequently, the thesis offers a representative profile of an ‘anarchist concept’ of solidarity, which is characterised by notions of universal inclusion, collective responsibility and the social production of individuality.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Augustinian Auden: the Influence of Augustine of Hippo on W. H. Auden Stephen J. Schuler, Ph.D. Mentor: Richard Rankin
    ABSTRACT Augustinian Auden: The Influence of Augustine of Hippo on W. H. Auden Stephen J. Schuler, Ph.D. Mentor: Richard Rankin Russell, Ph.D. It is widely acknowledged that W. H. Auden became a Christian in about 1940, but relatively little critical attention has been paid to Auden‟s theology, much less to the particular theological sources of Auden‟s faith. Auden read widely in theology, and one of his earliest and most important theological influences on his poetry and prose is Saint Augustine of Hippo. This dissertation explains the Augustinian origin of several crucial but often misunderstood features of Auden‟s work. They are, briefly, the nature of evil as privation of good; the affirmation of all existence, and especially the physical world and the human body, as intrinsically good; the difficult aspiration to the fusion of eros and agape in the concept of Christian charity; and the status of poetry as subject to both aesthetic and moral criteria. Auden had already been attracted to similar ideas in Lawrence, Blake, Freud, and Marx, but those thinkers‟ common insistence on the importance of physical existence took on new significance with Auden‟s acceptance of the Incarnation as an historical reality. For both Auden and Augustine, the Incarnation was proof that the physical world is redeemable. Auden recognized that if neither the physical world nor the human body are intrinsically evil, then the physical desires of the body, such as eros, the self-interested survival instinct, cannot in themselves be intrinsically evil. The conflict between eros and agape, or altruistic love, is not a Manichean struggle of darkness against light, but a struggle for appropriate placement in a hierarchy of values, and Auden derived several ideas about Christian charity from Augustine.
    [Show full text]
  • MORAL ECONOMY: CLAIMS for the COMMON GOOD by Elizabeth D
    MORAL ECONOMY: CLAIMS FOR THE COMMON GOOD By Elizabeth D. Mauritz A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Philosophy – Doctor of Philosophy 2014 ABSTRACT MORAL ECONOMY: CLAIMS FOR THE COMMON GOOD By Elizabeth D. Mauritz The cases, issues, and theoretical convictions of the social science work on the concept ‘Moral Economy’ are explored to develop a full understanding of what divergent theories and accounts share in common and to gauge the philosophical relevance of Moral Economy. The work of E.P. Thompson, James Scott, William Booth, Thomas Arnold, and Daniel Little are featured along with contemporary cases of Moral Economy. Conceptual clarification is guided by the categorization of common qualities including the scope of application, whether it is used historically or normatively, relevant time frame, nature of the community, goals that motivate practitioners, and how people are epistemically situated in relation to the Moral Economy under consideration. Moral Economy is identified here as a community centered response, arising from a sense of common good, reinforced by custom or tradition, to an unjust appropriation or abuse of land, labor, human dignity, natural resources, or material goods; moreover, it is the regular behaviors producing social arrangements that promote just relations between unequal persons or groups within a community to achieve long-term social sustainability. I argue that the moral economists are right to insist that people regularly make collective claims and take action on behalf of their communities for reasons that are not primarily self-interested. Furthermore, I demonstrate that social ethics and political behavior are culturally and temporally contextual, i.e.
    [Show full text]