© 2004 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 69(2): 155–160, 2004

A New Report of Multiple Sex Chromosome System in the Order Gymnotiformes (Pisces)

Sebastián Sánchez1,*, Alejandro Laudicina2 and Lilian Cristina Jorge1

1 Instituto de Ictiología del Nordeste, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Sargento Cabral 2139 (3400) Corrientes, 2 Laboratorio de Citogenética Molecular, Departamento de Radiobiología, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Gral. Paz 1499 (1650) San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Received December 25, 2004; accepted April 3, 2004

Summary An X1X2Y sex chromosome system is reported for the first time in sp. The chromosome number observed was 2n40 (14 M-SM26 ST-A) in females and 2n39 (15 M- SM24 ST-A) in males, with the same fundamental number in both sexes (FN54). The multiple sex chromosome system might have been originated by a Robertsonian translocation of an ancestral acrocentric Y-chromosome with an acrocentric autosome, resulting in a metacentric neo-Y chromo- some observed in males. Single NORs were detected on the short arm of a middle-sized acrocentric chromosome pair. Constitutive heterochromatin was observed in the pericentromeric regions of sev- eral chromosome pairs, including the neo-Y chromosome and the NOR carrier chromosomes. The DAPI/CMA3 stain revealed that all the pericentromeric heterochromatin are A T rich whereas the NORs were associated with GC rich base composition. The possible ancestral condition character- ized by an undifferentiated Y- chromosome from all the Gymnotiformes fishes is discussed.

Key words X1X2Y sex chromosomes, C-NOR band, CMA3-DAPI stain, Gymnotus, .

Multiple sex chromosome systems are known only for 7 neotropical fish species representing near 1% species cytogenetically analyzed already (Almeida-Toledo and Foresti 2001). This group is composed of species that are not closely related taxonomic units (different orders or families), indi- cating a polyphyletic origin for multiple sex chromosomes in fishes (Almeida-Toledo et al. 2000b, c).

Thus, in the neotropical fish fauna the X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y sex chromosome system has been de- scribed for 5 species. From these, in 2 Mexican species of Cyprinidontiformes (unnamed species, Uyeno and Miller 1971, 1972) and in 2 species of Gymnotiformes ( sp.2, Almeida- Toledo et al. 1984 and pinnicaudatus, Almeida-Toledo et al. 2000c), Robertson- ian translocations could have been involved in the origin of the neo-Y chromosome. In the remain- ing, one species (Hoplias malabaricus), pericentric inversions and translocations are considered to be involved in the sex chromosome differentiation (Bertollo et al. 1997). Exceptional- ly, in Hoplias sp. was described a XX/XY1Y2 system, when the Y-chromosomes would be result of a centric fission from the ancestral Y-chromosome (Bertollo et al. 1983). A single species with fe- male heterogamety presenting the multiple system ZZ/ZW1W2 was reported for Apareiodon affinis (Characiformes) (Moreira-Filho et al. 1980). The occurrence of a centric fission from a member of the pair 1 followed by pericentric inversions, was proposed to explain the origin and morphology of the female submetacentric W1 and W2 chromosomes (Jesus et al. 1999). Studies carried out on several Gymnotus species showed a wide heterogeneity of diploid chro- mosome numbers. They range from 2n40 in G. sylvius to 2n54 in G. carapo, including species with 2n42, 46, 48 and 52. In any cases has been identified sex chromosomes (Fernandez-Matioli et al. 1998).

* Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 156 Sebastián Sánchez et al. Cytologia 69(2)

In the present work, we described the first occurrence of sex chromosome system in Gymnotus and the third occurrence of a X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y system for Gymnotiformes from a sample of Gym- notus sp. The hypothetical evolution of the sex determination in the order Gymnotiformes is also discussed.

Materials and methods Twenty specimens of Gymnotus sp. (9 females and 11 males) from Corrientes Province were collected in ponds near to Riachuelo River, a tributary of Paraná River, Argentina (27°32S; 58°17W). The chromosome preparations were obtained from kidney cells using direct methods (Foresti et al. 1993). The final suspension was dropped on to the slides for diploid number determi- nations, C (Sumner 1972) and NOR (Howell and Black 1980) banding and Chromomicin/4,6-di- amidino-2-phenylindole (CMA3/DAPI) staining (Christian et al. 1998). All fishes were classified by Dr. Jorge Casciotta and Dr. Adriana Almirón and deposited in the fish collection of the Instituto de Ictiología del Nordeste, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corri- entes, Argentina.

Results The diploid number of all specimens of Gymnotus sp. analyzed was determined after the re- count of 30 metaphase plates per individual. The chromosome modal number was 2n40 for fe- males and 2n39 for males, with a karyotypic formulae of 14 M-SM26 ST-A and 15 M-SM24 ST-A, respectively, resulting in a fundamental number (FN) equal to 54 for all the fishes (Fig. 1). This difference in chromosome number is due to a Robertsonian translocation between 2 medium acrocentric chromosomes, becoming a major metacentric chromosome in males, the neo-Y. The X1 and X2 chromosomes were identified preliminarily as members of the chromosome pairs 13 and 18. The nucleolus organizer regions were detected by silver staining in the short arm in the fif- teenth ST-A chromosome pair (Fig. 2). Constitutive heterochromatic regions were detected in small sized blocks of the pericentromeric regions in several chromosome pairs (including the neo-Y chro- mosome) and adjacent to the NORs (Fig. 2). CMA3/DAPI stain applied to male preparations re- vealed small regions DAPI CMA3 occurring with the pericentromeric C-positive bands, while DAPI CMA3 bands were detected associated with NORs (Fig. 3a, b).

Discussion The multiple sex chromosome systems are relatively unusual in Neotropical fishes. They have been described for not closely related taxonomic groups, which indicates a polyphyletic origin (Almeida-Toledo et al. 2000a, b, c). Three different mechanisms were proposed by White (1973) to explain the origin of multiple sex chromosomes. The first, involves a centric fusion and was proposed for the origin of the neo-Y chromosome from two Mexican unnamed species (Uyeno and Miller 1971, 1972) and for the Gym- notiformes Eigenmannia sp. 2 and Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus (Almeida-Toledo et al. 2000c). The second is based on reciprocal translocations that could have been occurred in the neo-Y origin of Hoplias malabaricus (Bertollo et al. 1997). Finally, the third way could be either a chromosome dissociation or a centric fission and would explain the Y1Y2 chromosomes observed in Hoplias sp. (Bertollo et al. 1983) as well as the W1W2 chromosomes described in Apareidon affinis (Moreira- Filho et al. 1980). The differences detected between male and female karyotypes of Gymnotus sp. could be origi- nated by a Robertsonian translocation involving an ancestral acrocentric Y chromosome with an 2004 Multiple Sex Chromosome System in Gymnotiformes 157

Fig. 1. Giemsa stained karyotypes of Gymnotus sp.: a Female; b Male.

Fig. 2. C-banding karyotype and the Ag-NOR bearing pair sequentially stained from a male of Gymnotus sp. acrocentric autosome, originating a neo Y-chromosome observed in the males. This chromosome, the major sized in the male karyotype, could have one arm homologue to the original X chromo- some (now X1 chromosome) and the other arm corresponding to autosome involved in the Robert- sonnian translocation (now X2 chromosome) (Fig. 4). A similar mechanism was postulated for the origin of neo-Y chromosomes observed in the Gymnotiformes Eigenmannia sp. 2 and Brachyhy- popomus pinnicaudatus (Almeida-Toledo et al. 2000a, b, c). In a recent study, Almeida-Toledo et al. (2002) report the occurrence of female heterogamety in 3 isolated populations of E. virescens. This constitutes the first case of both XX/XY and ZZ/ZW sex chromosome system within a Gymnotiformes species. They could have derived from one mor- phologically undifferentiated acrocentric chromosome pair. It has been proposed that the variation of the sex chromosome determination could be result of a high plasticity of the sex-determining re- gion. This along with crossing-over and heterochromatinization events would explain the change from male to female heterogamety (Almeida-Toledo et al. 2002). A similar situation was suggested to interpret the sex chromosome variability observed in Xiphophorus maculatus (Volff and Schartl 2001). The presence of an heterochromatic segment DAPI was observed in the pericentromeric re- gion of the neo-Y chromosome in Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus and Eigenmannia sp. 2, indicat- ing a possible association of this AT rich region with the translocated acrocentric chromosomes involved in the neo-Y origin (Almeida-Toledo et al. 2000a). The small bright segment in the peri- 158 Sebastián Sánchez et al. Cytologia 69(2) centromeric regions of the neo-Y chromosome after the DAPI staining observed here in Gym- notus sp., could indicate a similar base compo- sition in the pericentromeric region of meta- centrics neo-Y of the three species mentioned above. Studies carried out on other Gymnoti- formes species, (pre- senting XX/XY sex chromosome system), re- veal that the distal region of the acrocentric X chromosome presents an additional block of heterochromatin G C rich (CMA3 ), without a corresponding segment in the Y-chromo- some, suggesting that this heterochromatic block could be related with sex in Eigenman- nia (Almeida-Toledo and Foresti 2001). In

Eigenmannia sp. 2 (with X1X2Y sex chromo- some system), an additional CMA3 segment was also observed in females, which present eight large acrocentric chromosomes with CMA3 blocks, while in the males only 7 bands have been detected. The authors inter- preted this situation as a loss of the fragment GC rich in the Robertsonian translocation re- sponsible of neo-Y origin (Almeida-Toledo et al. 2000b).

The CMA3/DAPI staining made on Gym- Fig. 3. Metaphases of male Gymnotus sp.: a DAPI- notus sp. did not reveal CMA3 regions asso- staining; b. CMA3-staining. The arrows indicate the ciated with some chromosome pair excepting NORs; the arrowheads indicate the neo-Y chromosome. to the NORs carrier chromosomes, which pre- sent a banding pattern similar to other fish species (Mayr et al. 1986, Galetti Jr. et al. 1995, Affonso et al. 2001, among others). Thus, the CMA3 region observed in the X- chromosome of Eigenmannia species could be restricted in this genus, while the AT rich re- gion associated with the Y-chromosome could be considered as an ancestral character of the order. Differences between sex chromosomes Fig. 4. Hypothetical origin of the multiple sex chromo- originated by heterochromatinization processes some system in Gymnotus sp. X and Y: original sex chro- have been described for Poecilia sphenops mosomes; A: original autosomes; X1, X2 and Neo-Y: re- (Haaf and Schmid 1984), Semaprochilodus arranged sex chromosomes. The bars in chromosomes A and Y indicate the break points. taeniurus (Feldberg et al. 1987) and for several species of the genera Leporinus (Galetti and Foresti 1986) and Triportheus (Artoni et al. 2001).

It is interesting to emphasize that Gymnotiformes species with X1X2Y sex chromosome sys- tem belongs to 3 different families, the (Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus), Sternopygidae (Eigenmannia sp. 2) and Gymnotidae (Gymnotus sp.). In a recent study about phylo- genetic relationships among several Gymnotiformes species, the families mentioned above were 2004 Multiple Sex Chromosome System in Gymnotiformes 159 classified into 3 different phyllogenetic lines (Albert and Campos-da-Paz 1998). These observations reinforce the hypothetical independent origin of the multiple sex chromosome systems within the order Gymnotiformes proposed by Almeida Toledo et al. (2000b, c). According to the following evidence, we suggest that the ancestral condition of the order Gymnotiformes is the presence of genes responsible from male determination in an undifferentiated chromosome (ancestral Y-chromosome): i) the early XX/XY sex chromosome differentiation ob- served in Eigenmannia virescens; ii) the independent origin of multiple X1X2Y sex chromosome system in three not closely related taxonomic species; iii) the difficulty to recognize the X-chromo- somes in all the species with sex chromosomes. Thus, the occurrence of Robertsonian events between the hypothetical undifferentiated Y chro- mosome and a single autosome might have resulted in a multiple sex chromosome system in species belonging to genera without sex chromosome heteromorphism. To prove this hypothesis, molecular studies are necessary to identify the undifferentiated sex chromosome pair that could be present in the remaining species of the order Gymnotiformes.

Acknowledgements This study was supported by grants from the UNNE and CNEA (PICT89 N°0103089). We thank Dr. María Muhlmann and Dr. José Bechara for critical reading of the manuscript.

References

Affonso, P. R. A. M., Guedes, W., Pauls, E. and Galetti Jr, P. M. 2001. Cytogenetic analysis of coral reef fishes from Brazil (Families Pomacanthidae and Chaetodontidae). Cytologia 66: 379–384. Albert, J. S. and Campos-da-Paz, R. 1998. Phylogenetic Systematics of Gymnotiformes with Diagnoses of 58 Clades: A Re- view of Available Data. In: Malabarba, L. R., Reis, R., Vari, R., Lucena Z. M. S. and Lucena, C. A. (eds.). Phy- logeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. EDIPUCRS. Porto Alegre, (RS), Brazil. pp. 419–460. Almeida-Toledo, L. F., Foresti, F. and Toledo-Filho, S. A. 1984. Complex sex chromosome system in Eigenmannia sp. (Pisces, Gymnotiformes). Genetica 64: 165–169. —, — and — 2000a. Karyotypic evolution in neotropical freshwater fish. Chromosomes Today 13: 169–182. —, —, Daniel, M. F. Z. and Toledo-Filho, S. A. 2000b. Sex chromosome evolution in fish: the formation of the neo-Y chro- mosome in Eigenmannia (Gymnotiformes). Chromosoma 109: 197–200. —, Stocker, A. J., Foresti, F., Toledo-Filho, S. A. 2000c. Sex chromosome evolution in fish. II. Second occurrence of an

X1X2Y sex chromosome system in Gymnotiformes. Chromosome Res. 8: 335–340. — and Foresti, F. 2001. Morphologically differentiated sex chromosomes in neotropical freshwater fish. Genetica 111: 91–100. —, Daniel-Silva, M. F. Z., Moysés, C. B., Fonteles, S. B. A., Lopes, C. E., Akama, A. and Foresti, F. 2002. Chromosome evolution in fish: sex chromosome variability in Eigenmannia virescens (Gymnotiformes: Sternopygidae). Cyto- genet Genome Res. 99: 164–169. Artoni, R. F., Falcão, J. N., Moreira-Filho, O. and Bertollo, L. A. C. 2001. An uncommon condition for a sex chromosome system in characidae fish. Distribution and differentiation of the ZZ/ZW system in Triportheus. Chromosome Res. 9: 449–456. Bertollo, L. A. C., Takahashi, C. S. and Moreira Filho, O. 1983. Multiple sex chromosomes in the genus Hoplias (Pisces, Erythrinidae). Cytologia 48: 1–12.

—, Fontes, M. S., Fenocchio, A. S. and Cano, J. 1997. The X1X2Y sex chromosome system in the fish Hoplias malabaricus I. G-, C and chromosome replication banding. Chromosome Res. 5: 493–499. Christian, A., McNiel, E., Robinson, J., Drabek, R., Larue, S., Waldren, C. and Bedford, J. 1998. A versatile image analysis approach for simultaneous chromosome identification and localization of probes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 82: 172–179. Feldberg, E., Bertollo, L. A. C., Almeida-Toledo, L. F., Foresti, F., Moreira-Filho, O. and Santos, A. F. 1987. Biological as- pects of Amazonian fishes. IX. Cytogenetic studies in two species of the genus Semaprochilodus (Pisces, Characi- dae). Genome 29: 1–4. Fernandes-Matioli, F. M. C., Marcheto, M. C. N., Almeida-Toledo, L. F. and Toledo-Filho, S. A. 1998. High intraspecific karyological conservation in four species of Gymnotus (Pisces: Gymnotiformes) from Southeastern Brazilian 160 Sebastián Sánchez et al. Cytologia 69(2)

basins. Caryologia 51: 221–234. Foresti, F., Almeida, C. and Almeida-Toledo, L. F. 1993. A method for chromosome preparations from large fish specimens using “in vitro” short-term treatment with colchicine. Experientia 49: 810–814. Galetti Jr., P. M. and Foresti, F. 1986. Evolution of the ZZ/ZW system in Leporinus (Anostomidae, Characiformes). Cytolo- gia 60: 375–382. —, Mestriner, C. A., Monaco, P. J. and Rasch, E. M. 1995. Post-zygotic modifications and intra- and inter-individual nucle- olar organizing regions variations in fish: report of a case involving Leporinus friderici. Chromosome Res. 3: 285–290. Haaf, T. and Schmid, M. 1984. An early stage of ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes differentiation in Poecilia spenops var. melanis- tica (Poecilidae, ). Chromosoma 89: 37–41. Howell, W. M. and Black, D. A. 1980. Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experentia 36: 1014–1015. Jesus, C. M., Bertollo, L. A. C. and Moreira-Filho, O. 1999. Comparative cytogenetics in Apareiodon affinis (Pisces, Characiformes) and considerations regarding diversification of the group. Genetica 105: 63–67. Mayr, B., Rab, P. and Kalat, M. 1986. Localization of NORs and counterstaining-enhanced fluorescence studies in Salmo gairdneri and Salmo trutta (Pisces, ). Theor Appl Genet. 71: 703–707. Moreira-Filho, O., Bertollo, L. A. C. and Galetti Jr, P. M. 1980. Evidences for a multiple sex chromosome system with fe- male heterogamety in Apareiodon affinis (Pisces, Parodontidae). Caryologia 33: 83–91. Sumner, A. T. 1972. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res. 75: 304–306. Uyeno, T. and Miller, R. R. 1971. Multiple sex chromosomes in a Mexican Cyprinodontidae fish. Nature 231: 452–453. — and — 1972. Second discovery of multiple sex chromosome among fishes. Experientia 15: 223–226. Volff, J. N. and Schartl, M. 2001. Variability of genetic sex determination in poeciliid fishes. Genetica 111: 101–110. White, M. J. D. 1973. Cytology and Evolution. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.