DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Picture of Life's History on Earth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A New Picture of Life's History on Earth Commentary A new picture of life’s history on Earth Mark Newman* Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501 hen most people think of paleon- his primary source (2, 3). Other compila- database is as exhaustive as possible, sub- Wtology, they picture the field pale- tions also have been published (4, 5), but stantial biases are introduced. For exam- ontologist digging up fossils with a tooth- Sepkoski’s database has received more ple, it is quite feasible that the increase in brush and publishing descriptions of the attention by far than any other. Sepkoski’s diversity toward recent times seen in Fig. anatomies of uncovered specimens in the database was simple in structure: it re- 1 is a result primarily of the greater vol- trade literature. New discoveries of dino- corded the first and last known occur- ume of rock available from recent times, saurs even make the national headlines. rences in the fossil record of more than and the greater amount of effort that has For many decades the discovery and de- 30,000 marine invertebrate genera in been put into studying these rocks. A scription of a previously unknown fossil about 4,000 families. Marine invertebrates number of studies over the years have species was the calling card that gained have been the focus of most statistical presented evidence showing that apparent would-be paleontologists professional ac- studies, because preservation is much diversity is closely correlated with the ceptance. However, in the last quarter of more reliable in marine environments and intensity with which different periods of a century or so, many of the most intrigu- invertebrates are much more numerous geologic time have been sampled (6, 7). ing new results in paleontology have come than vertebrates. The new database not from field studies, but from the com- Time was mea- compiled by Alroy pilation and analysis of large-scale data- sured in strati- and coworkers (one bases of fossil species. These databases graphic stages, un- John Alroy, Charles Marshall, and a of whom is the same have provided us with quantitative pic- even intervals large group of distinguished Jack Sepkoski men- tures of the pattern and size of mass defined by using a tioned above) at- collaborators report on the extinction events, the rate at which new variety of geologi- tempts to correct species have appeared, and crucially the cal and paleonto- creation of a new database some of these prob- number of species on the planet through logical markers. that catalogs fossils at the level lems by including time, the so-called standing diversity. In Many features of more comprehensive an article appearing in this issue of PNAS the fossil record of individual collections. data about fossil COMMENTARY (1), John Alroy, Charles Marshall, and a have been de- taxa, in particular di- large group of distinguished collaborators duced from Sep- viding data into col- report on the creation of a new database koski’s data. One of the most famous is lections—groups of fossils recovered from that catalogs fossils at the level of individ- shown in Fig. 1, which is a plot of the total specific locales by specific workers or ual collections. Preliminary analysis of this number of genera in the database as a teams—with repeated occurrences of taxa database reveals interesting results, call- function of time during the Phanero- at different times and places explicitly noted. ing into question some fundamental ideas zoic—approximately the last 540 million Like the database of Sepkoski, the new about the history of life on Earth. years, from the so-called ‘‘Cambrian ex- database focuses on marine invertebrates, There are three principal features wor- plosion’’ of metazoan diversity until the and is at present incomplete—work is still thy of note in the paper by Alroy et al. present day. The shape of this curve mir- continuing on the compilation. Currently it First, the paper announces the creation of rors the accepted view of life’s history on covers two time periods of about 150 million the new database. Second, the authors the planet: a burst of diversification in the years each, one in the middle part of the describe new methods of data analysis Cambrian and Ordovician, followed by a Paleozoic, during the plateau seen in Fig. 1, made possible by the database that help to rough plateau in diversity for about 200 and one from the mid-Mesozoic to the eliminate biases inherent in previous stud- million years in the latter half of the Paleo- mid-Cenozoic, the central portion of the ies as a result of variations in patterns of zoic, until the dip in the center of the figure, diversity increase in the right-hand part of fossil preservation and collection. Third, which represents the massive late-Permian the figure. these new methods raise doubts about the extinction event. Following this extinction, it Because of the division of the database long-held belief that biodiversity has in- appears that diversity first recovered and into collections, Alroy and coworkers creased dramatically in the last 250 million then increased substantially during the have been able to compensate for biases in years; it may in fact be that diversity has Mezozoic and Cenozoic, rising to a present- the intensity of sampling of different time been roughly constant, although no firm day level two or more times higher than any intervals, and to some extent for varying verdict has been reached yet on this point. seen during the Paleozoic. quality of fossil preservation in their data, Statistical analyses of species turnover Sepkoski’s database, although extensive and so make more accurate estimates of and diversity in the fossil record have been and thorough, has a number of shortcom- diversity (although, as they are the first to dominated in the past by the work of one ings. In particular, it records only first and emphasize, biases are still present). Their man, Jack Sepkoski, who from the early last occurrences of taxa anywhere in the technique of analysis involves breaking eighties until his death in May 1999 world, and no other data, such as how the data down in two ways. First, they worked single-handedly on the compila- commonly taxa occur or where. Thus very tion of an encyclopedic database of oc- widely occurring taxa are accorded exactly currences of marine invertebrates in the the same status as ones that are found See companion article on page 6261. fossil record, using journal publications as rarely. Also, by the very fact that the *E-mail: [email protected] www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.121190498 PNAS ͉ May 22, 2001 ͉ vol. 98 ͉ no. 11 ͉ 5955–5956 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 intervals that have the same total count can be expected to have approximately equal real diversities. That is, the results are comparable between different geo- logic times. To some extent, the principal new con- tributions of the present study are the database itself and the sampling-standard- ized methods for measuring diversity. However, the preliminary results also of- fer some interesting suggestions of what is to come in this field. The authors make a host of different observations about the results of their calculations, but perhaps the most interesting is that most of their measures of biodiversity are found to give approximately equal figures for diversity in the two time periods studied. Recall that in the curve of Fig. 1, derived from the earlier work of Sepkoski, the two periods showed very different behavior, the first having a rough plateau in diversity, the second showing a marked diversity in- Fig. 1. Total number of genera as a function of time during the Phanerozoic, in the classic database of crease. This increase is not clearly visible Sepkoski (2, 3). The two dark blue regions indicate the time intervals studied in the new work by Alroy in the new results, suggesting that the et al. (1). supposed post-Paleozoic diversification of marine fauna may be merely an artifact of biases in the Sepkoski database. It should divide the data into roughly equal time from one collection to another. This, how- be emphasized however, that these results intervals—more uniform in length than ever, may not be the case, so they also use are by no means final, and it is too early to the intervals used by Sepkoski. Second, several other techniques that weight lists draw any firm conclusions from the data. within each interval they attempt to according to their length, and they report The creation of this new database of the choose a constant number of actual fossil separate results for each of the different fossil record may well have far-reaching specimens, as if the intensity of sampling methods used. Clearly in the absence of effects. The mere fact that most of the across different times and places had been more detailed information about which previous work in this area has made use of uniform, rather than widely varying as it in weighting is correct, only results that are just a single source of data—the Sepkoski compilation—makes the creation of an fact is. Unfortunately, only the number of robust across different methods should be independent database an important and taxa is recorded for many of their collec- considered to have strong support. worthwhile enterprise. However, the in- tions and not the number of specimens, so The diversity counts given by Alroy et al. clusion in this new database of far more it is not possible to fix specimen number are the total numbers of taxa seen across detailed information on frequency of oc- directly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The MBL Model and Stochastic Paleontology
    216 Chapter seven ised exciting new avenues for research, that insights from biology and ecology could more profi tably be applied to paleontology, and that the future lay in assembling large databases as a foundation for analysis of broad-scale patterns of evolution over geological history. But in compar- ison to other expanding young disciplines—like theoretical ecology— paleobiology lacked a cohesive theoretical and methodological agenda. However, over the next ten years this would change dramatically. Chapter Seven One particular ecological/evolutionary issue emerged as the central unifying problem for paleobiology: the study and modeling of the his- “Towards a Nomothetic tory of diversity over time. This, in turn, motivated a methodological question: how reliable is the fossil record, and how can that reliability be Paleontology”: The MBL Model tested? These problems became the core of analytical paleobiology, and and Stochastic Paleontology represented a continuation and a consolidation of the themes we have examined thus far in the history of paleobiology. Ultimately, this focus led paleobiologists to groundbreaking quantitative studies of the inter- The Roots of Nomotheticism play of rates of origination and extinction of taxa through time, the role of background and mass extinctions in the history of life, the survivor- y the early 1970s, the paleobiology movement had begun to acquire ship of individual taxa, and the modeling of historical patterns of diver- Bconsiderable momentum. A number of paleobiologists began ac- sity. These questions became the central components of an emerging pa- tively building programs of paleobiological research and teaching at ma- leobiological theory of macroevolution, and by the mid 1980s formed the jor universities—Stephen Jay Gould at Harvard, Tom Schopf at the Uni- basis for paleobiologists’ claim to a seat at the “high table” of evolution- versity of Chicago, David Raup at the University of Rochester, James ary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • 12/04 CURRICULUM VITAE Karl W
    12/04 CURRICULUM VITAE Karl W. Flessa Department of Geosciences University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 (520) 621-7336 FAX (520) 621-2672 [email protected] Personal Data Birth Date: August 3, 1946 Place of Birth: Nürnberg, Germany Citizenship: U.S.A. (since 1950) Education and Degrees Ph.D., Geological Sciences, 1973. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island A.B., Geology, 1968. Lafayette College, Easton, Pennsylvania Principal Administrative Appointments Head, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, 1997-1999 Project Director, Research Training Group: Analysis of Biological Diversification, 1992-1994 Program Director, National Science Foundation, 1988-1990 Director, University of Arizona Geology Field Camp; 1983, 1985-1988 Academic Appointments Fellow, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, 2002-2003 Professor of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1987-present Professor of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, 1997-present Visiting Professor, Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada, México, 1999 Research Associate, Smithsonian Institution, 1988-1991 Associate Professor, University of Arizona; 1981-1987 Humboldt Fellow, Universität Tübingen, Germany, and University of Birmingham, U.K.; 1983- 1984 Research Associate, Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum; 1978-present Assistant Professor, University of Arizona; 1977-1981 Assistant Professor, State University of New York at Stony Brook; 1972-1977 Senior Assistant, Marine Biological Laboratory; 6/72-8/72 Lecturer, Case Western Reserve University; 1/71-6/71 Research Interests Current research interests focus on 1) the environmental history and conservation biology of the Colorado River Delta, 2) the taphonomy and paleoecology of Recent and Pleistocene invertebrates in the Gulf of California, 3) the quality of the fossil record, and 4) the biogeography of Recent bivalve mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • What Really Happened in the Late Triassic?
    Historical Biology, 1991, Vol. 5, pp. 263-278 © 1991 Harwood Academic Publishers, GmbH Reprints available directly from the publisher Printed in the United Kingdom Photocopying permitted by license only WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN THE LATE TRIASSIC? MICHAEL J. BENTON Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. (Received January 7, 1991) Major extinctions occurred both in the sea and on land during the Late Triassic in two major phases, in the middle to late Carnian and, 12-17 Myr later, at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. Many recent reports have discounted the role of the earlier event, suggesting that it is (1) an artefact of a subsequent gap in the record, (2) a complex turnover phenomenon, or (3) local to Europe. These three views are disputed, with evidence from both the marine and terrestrial realms. New data on terrestrial tetrapods suggests that the late Carnian event was more important than the end-Triassic event. For tetrapods, the end-Triassic extinction was a whimper that was followed by the radiation of five families of dinosaurs and mammal- like reptiles, while the late Carnian event saw the disappearance of nine diverse families, and subsequent radiation of 13 families of turtles, crocodilomorphs, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, lepidosaurs and mammals. Also, for many groups of marine animals, the Carnian event marked a more significant turning point in diversification than did the end-Triassic event. KEY WORDS: Triassic, mass extinction, tetrapod, dinosaur, macroevolution, fauna. INTRODUCTION Most studies of mass extinction identify a major event in the Late Triassic, usually placed at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Latitude Origins of the Four Phanerozoic Evolutionary Faunas
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/866186; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Low-Latitude Origins of the Four Phanerozoic Evolutionary Faunas A. Rojas1*, J. Calatayud1, M. Kowalewski2, M. Neuman1, and M. Rosvall1 1Integrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden 5 2Florida Museum of Natural History, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract: Sepkoski’s hypothesis of Three Great Evolutionary Faunas that dominated 10 Phanerozoic oceans represents a foundational concept of macroevolutionary research. However, the hypothesis lacks spatial information and fails to recognize ecosystem changes in Mesozoic oceans. Using a multilayer network representation of fossil occurrences, we demonstrate that Phanerozoic oceans sequentially harbored four evolutionary faunas: Cambrian, Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic. These mega-assemblages all emerged at low latitudes and dispersed 15 out of the tropics. The Paleozoic–Mesozoic transition was abrupt, coincident with the Permian mass extinction, whereas the Mesozoic–Cenozoic transition was protracted, concurrent with gradual ecological shifts posited by the Mesozoic Marine Revolution. These findings support the notion that long-term ecological changes, historical contingencies, and major geological events all have played crucial roles in shaping the evolutionary history of marine animals. 20 One Sentence Summary: Network analysis reveals that Phanerozoic oceans harbored four evolutionary faunas with variable tempo and underlying causes.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISCUM the Newsletter of the Paleontological Society Volume 13, Number 2, Fall 2004
    PRISCUM The Newsletter of the Paleontological Society Volume 13, Number 2, Fall 2004 Paleontological PRESIDENT’S Society Officers COLUMN: Inside... President Treasurer’s Report 2 William I. Ausich WE NEED YOU! GSA Information 2 President-Elect by William I. Ausich Reviews of PS- David Bottjer Sponsored Sessions 3 Past-President Why are you a member of The Paleontology Portal 5 Patricia H. Kelley The Paleontological Society? In PS Lecture Program 6 Secretary the not too distance past, the Books for Review 9 Roger D. K. Thomas only way to receive a copy of the Journal of Book Reviews 9 Treasurer Paleontology and Paleobiology was to pay your dues Conference Announce- and belong to the Society. I suppose one could Mark E. Patzkowsky have borrowed a copy from a friend or wander over ments 14 JP Managing Editors to the library. However, this was probably done Ann (Nancy) F. Budd with a heavy burden of guilt. Now, as we move Christopher A. Brochu into the digital age of scientific journal publishing, Jonathan Adrain one can have copies of the Journal of Paleontology and Paleobiology transmitted right to your Paleobiology Editors computer. It actually may arrive faster than the Tomasz Baumiller U.S. mail, you do not have to pay anything, and Robyn Burnham you do not even have to walk over to the library. Philip Gingerich No need for shelf space, no hassle, no dues, no Program Coordinator guilt – isn’t the Web great? The Web is great, but the Society needs dues-paying members in order Mark A. Wilson to continue to publish in paper, digitally, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • David M. Raup 1933–2015
    David M. Raup 1933–2015 A Biographical Memoir by Michael Foote and Arnold I. Miller ©2017 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. DAVID MALCOLM RAUP April 24, 1933–July 9, 2015 Elected to the NAS, 1979 David M. Raup, one of the most influential paleontolo- gists of the second half of the 20th century, infused the field with concepts from modern biology and established several major lines of research that continue today: Theoretical morphology. Why, despite eons of evolution, is the spectrum of realized biological forms such a tiny fraction of those that are theoretically possible? First-order patterns in the geologic history of biodiversity. Has biodiversity increased steadily over time? What does the answer imply about the biosphere and the nature of the fossil record? Mathematical modeling of evolution. What By Michael Foote patterns result, for example, from the structure of evolu- and Arnold I. Miller tionary trees? And what is the apparent order that emerges from stochastic processes? Biological extinction. What temporal patterns are evident in the history of life and what are their implications for the drivers of extinction and for Earth’s place in the cosmos? The pilot and the paleontologist In The Right Stuff(1979), author Tom Wolfe observed that the calm West Virginia drawl of the renowned test pilot and World War II ace Chuck Yeager could still be heard in the voices of virtually all commercial pilots, decades after Yeager became the first to break the sound barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Similarity of Mammalian Body Size Across the Taxonomic Hierarchy and Across Space and Time Felisa A
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Biology Faculty & Staff ubP lications Scholarly Communication - Departments 5-1-2004 Similarity of Mammalian Body Size across the Taxonomic Hierarchy and across Space and Time Felisa A. Smith James H. Brown John P. Haskell S. Kathleen Lyons John Alroy See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_fsp Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Felisa A.; James H. Brown; John P. Haskell; S. Kathleen Lyons; John Alroy; Eric L. Charnov; Tamar Dayan; Brian J. Enquist; S.K. Morgan Ernest; Elizabeth A. Hadly; David Jablonski; Kate E. Jones; Dawn M. Kaufman; Pablo A. Marquet; Brian A. Maurer; Karl J. Niklas; Warren P. Porter; Kaustuv Roy; Bruce Tiffney; and Michael R. Willig. "Similarity of Mammalian Body Size across the Taxonomic Hierarchy and across Space and Time." 163, 5 (2004). http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_fsp/82 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarly Communication - Departments at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty & Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Felisa A. Smith, James H. Brown, John P. Haskell, S. Kathleen Lyons, John Alroy, Eric L. Charnov, Tamar Dayan, Brian J. Enquist, S.K. Morgan Ernest, Elizabeth A. Hadly, David Jablonski, Kate E. Jones, Dawn M. Kaufman, Pablo A. Marquet, Brian A. Maurer, Karl J. Niklas, Warren P. Porter, Kaustuv Roy, Bruce Tiffney, and Michael R. Willig This article is available at UNM Digital Repository: http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_fsp/82 vol.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Picture of Life's History on Earth
    Commentary A new picture of life’s history on Earth Mark Newman* Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501 hen most people think of paleon- his primary source (2, 3). Other compila- database is as exhaustive as possible, sub- Wtology, they picture the field pale- tions also have been published (4, 5), but stantial biases are introduced. For exam- ontologist digging up fossils with a tooth- Sepkoski’s database has received more ple, it is quite feasible that the increase in brush and publishing descriptions of the attention by far than any other. Sepkoski’s diversity toward recent times seen in Fig. anatomies of uncovered specimens in the database was simple in structure: it re- 1 is a result primarily of the greater vol- trade literature. New discoveries of dino- corded the first and last known occur- ume of rock available from recent times, saurs even make the national headlines. rences in the fossil record of more than and the greater amount of effort that has For many decades the discovery and de- 30,000 marine invertebrate genera in been put into studying these rocks. A scription of a previously unknown fossil about 4,000 families. Marine invertebrates number of studies over the years have species was the calling card that gained have been the focus of most statistical presented evidence showing that apparent would-be paleontologists professional ac- studies, because preservation is much diversity is closely correlated with the ceptance. However, in the last quarter of more reliable in marine environments and intensity with which different periods of a century or so, many of the most intrigu- invertebrates are much more numerous geologic time have been sampled (6, 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontologia Electronica the Paleobiological Revolution
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the Growth of Modern Paleontology Reviewed by Brian Switek David Sepkoski and Michael Ruse (editors) belief that paleon- University of Chicago Press, 2009 tology was more 584 pp., $65.00 (hardcover) closely related to ISBN 978-0-226-74861-0 geology rein- By the middle of the 20th century a great forced the idea divide had opened within evolutionary biology. As that it had little to summarized by paleontologist George Gaylord contribute to the Simpson, many geneticists “said that paleontology life sciences. had no further contributions to make to biology”, Despite this wide- while paleontologists believed that the emerging spread reticence science of genetics “had no significance for the to treat paleontol- true biologist.” (Simpson, 1944). Simpson, for his ogy as an evolu- own part, attempted to bring the disciplines into tionary discipline, accord in his classic Tempo and Mode in Evolution, however, paleon- but despite his efforts genetics eventually out- tologists such as stripped paleontology as the evolutionary science G.G. Simpson and du jour. Paleontology, some evolutionary theorists Norman Newell believed, could only testify to the fact of evolution fostered paleobiological research through the while telling us nothing of how such changes actu- 1950’s and 1960’s, setting a long fuse that finally ally occurred. Fortunately, however, some paleon- exploded in the 1970’s. Thomas Schopf, Niles tologists were not satisfied with this blinkered view Eldredge, Stephen Jay Gould, Elisabeth Vrba, of their discipline, and they began what historians David Raup, James Valentine, Jack Sepkoski, and David Sepkoski and Michael Ruse have called The many others transformed paleontology from a rela- Paleobiological Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeontology Newsletter
    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents100 Editorial 2 Association Business 3 Annual Meeting 2019 3 Awards and Prizes AGM 2018 12 PalAss YouTube Ambassador sought 24 Association Meetings 25 News 30 From our correspondents A Palaeontologist Abroad 40 Behind the Scenes: Yorkshire Museum 44 She married a dinosaur 47 Spotlight on Diversity 52 Future meetings of other bodies 55 Meeting Reports 62 Obituary: Ralph E. Chapman 67 Grant Reports 72 Book Reviews 104 Palaeontology vol. 62 parts 1 & 2 108–109 Papers in Palaeontology vol. 5 part 1 110 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no. 101 is 3rd June 2019. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 100 2 Editorial This 100th issue continues to put the “new” in Newsletter. Jo Hellawell writes about our new President Charles Wellman, and new Publicity Officer Susannah Lydon gives us her first news column. New award winners are announced, including the first ever PalAss Exceptional Lecturer (Stephan Lautenschlager). (Get your bids for Stephan’s services in now; check out pages 34 and 107.) There are also adverts – courtesy of Lucy McCobb – looking for the face of the Association’s new YouTube channel as well as a call for postgraduate volunteers to join the Association’s outreach efforts. But of course palaeontology would not be the same without the old. Behind the Scenes at the Museum returns with Sarah King’s piece on The Yorkshire Museum (York, UK). Norman MacLeod provides a comprehensive obituary of Ralph Chapman, and this issue’s palaeontologists abroad (Rebecca Bennion, Nicolás Campione and Paige dePolo) give their accounts of life in Belgium, Australia and the UK, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • DAVID SEPKOSKI Department of History University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana Gregory Hall 301 810 S. Wright St. Urbana, IL 61801 [email protected]
    DAVID SEPKOSKI Department of History University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana Gregory Hall 301 810 S. Wright St. Urbana, IL 61801 [email protected] Updated 2/2019 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2018 - Thomas M. Siebel Chair in History of Science and Professor of History Affiliate Professor, School of Information University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 2012 - 2018 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Senior Research Scholar, Department II 2006 - 2012 University of North Carolina Wilmington Associate Professor of History, 2010 - 2012 Assistant Professor of History, 2006 - 2010 2002 – 2006 Oberlin College Visiting Assistant Professor of History, 2004 - 2006 Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow in History, 2002 - 2004 EDUCATION 2002 University of Minnesota. Ph.D., Program in History of Science and Technology 1996 University of Chicago. A.M., Social Sciences 1994 Carleton College. B.A., History PUBLICATIONS Books In press Catastrophic Thinking: Extinction and the Value of Diversity Chicago: University of Chicago Press, forthcoming. 2012 Rereading the Fossil Record: The Growth of Paleobiology as an Evolutionary Discipline Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Paperback ed., 2015) 2007 Nominalism and Constructivism in Seventeenth-Century Mathematical Philosophy New York and London: Routledge. (Paperback ed., 2012) Sepkoski 2 Edited Volumes and Special Issues 2017 Histories of Data Editor, with Christine von Oertzen and Elena Aronova. Osiris 32. “Darwin and Paleontology.” Editor, with Marco Tamborini. Special issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 66, 1-54. 2009 The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the Growth of Modern Paleontology Editor, with Michael Ruse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Paperback ed., 2015) Journal Articles, Book Chapters, and Essay Reviews In press “The Unfinished Synthesis?: Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology in the 20th Century.” In special issue on “Historical and Conceptual Perspectives on the Modern Synthesis,” Journal of the History of Biology, forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2019-08-12 Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs Jordan, Katherine J. Jordan, K. J. (2019). Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/110722 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Using the Price Equation to Quantify Species Selection and Other Macroevolutionary Forces in Cretaceous Molluscs by Katherine J. Jordan A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2019 © Katherine J. Jordan 2019 Abstract Species selection and other macroevolutionary forces are challenging processes to study and quantify when using fossil data. Here, I used the Price equation to analyze changes in geographic range sizes prior to and during a mass extinction event to estimate the relative contribution of three macroevolutionary processes (species selection, anagenesis, and immigration). I also tested the hypothesis that larger geographic range size increases a group’s survivability during mass extinctions.
    [Show full text]