Cretaceous Rocks of South Coastal British REFERENCES Columbia Survived Into the Paleogene

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cretaceous Rocks of South Coastal British REFERENCES Columbia Survived Into the Paleogene Crustaceans.qxd 10/28/03 11:09 AM Page 57 Evolutionary and Biostratigraphic Implications Cretaceous rocks of south coastal British REFERENCES Columbia survived into the Paleogene. Of these, Enoploclytia and Latheticocarcinus survived into Alcock, A. 1900. Materials for a carcinological fauna of the Paleocene Epoch (Glaessner, 1969; Schweitzer India, 5: The Brachyura Primagenia or Dromiacea. et al., 2004). The remainder survived at least into Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 68(II:3): 123– 169. the Eocene, and Calliax and Neocallichirus are Bachmayer, F. 1954. Zwei bemerkenswerte Crustaceen- extant. Thus, the decapod genera discussed here Funde aus dem Jungtertiär des Wiener Beckens. do not appear to have been appreciably affected by Sitzungsberichte. Österreichische Akademie der the K/T extinction event. Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Abteilung 1. Biologie, Mineralogie, Erdkunde, und Verwandte Wissenschaften, 163(1 2): 63–70. Bate, C. S. 1888. Report on the Crustacea Macrura collected ACKNOWLEDGMENTS by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Report on the scientific results of the voyage of H. M. S. This work is the result of the efforts of numer- Challenger during the years 1873–76, Zoology 24: i-xc, ous individuals, other than the authors, who donat- 1 942, pls. 1–157. Bell, T. 1858. A monograph of the fossil malacostracous ed material for this study, facilitated the field Crustacea of Great Britain, Pt. I, Crustacea of the work, and offered stratigraphic and other informa- London Clay. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, tion. Without their generosity, the comprehensive London, 44 p. nature of this study would not have been possible. Bell, T. 1863. A monograph of the fossil malacostracous A. E. and M. Bernard collected and donated spec- Crustacea of Great Britain, Pt. II, Crustacea of the Gault and Greensand. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, imens, and A. Bernard assisted with field work and London, 40 p. provided a boat for transport to the Cowichan Berglund, R.E., and Feldmann, R.M. 1989. A new crab, Lake localities. D. Bowen, Courtenay, BC, Rogueus orri n. gen. and sp. (Decapoda: Brachyura) Canada, donated specimens to the study. D. from the Lookingglass Formation (Ulatisian Stage: Meckert, Courtenay, BC, Canada, donated numer- Lower Middle Eocene) of southwestern Oregon. Journal of Paleontology, 63: 69–73. ous specimens and assisted with field work and Beurlen, K. 1930. Vergleichende Stammesgeschichte stratigraphic interpretations. P. Bock and J. Grundlagen, Methoden, Probleme unter Besonderer Whittles assisted with field work. K. Morrison Beruchsichtingung der hoheren Krebse. Fortschrift prepared the specimen of Hoploparia horrida; his Geologie und Paleontologie, 8: 317–586. patience and skill is much appreciated. P. S. Bice, K. L., Scotese, C. R., Seidov, D., and Barron, E. J. 2000. Quantifying the role of geographic changes in Mustard and J. Haggart provided numerous help- Cenozoic ocean heat transport using uncoupled atmos- ful discussions and invaluable advice and informa- phere and ocean models. Palaeogeography, tion about the stratigraphy of the area. R. Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 161: 295–310. Ludvigsen and G. Beard, Vancouver Island, BC, Binkhorst, J. T. Van den. 1858. Neue Krebse aus der actively support amateur paleontology in the area. Maestrichter Tuffkreide. Verhandlungen des naturhis- torischen Vereins in preussische Rheinland und Mustard, G. Caldwell, and two anonymous Westfalen (Bonn), 14: 107–110. reviewers provided very thorough and careful Bishop, G. A. 1983a. Fossil decapod crustaceans from the reviews of the manuscript; our thanks to them. D. Lower Cretaceous Glen Rose Limestone of Central A. Waugh, Department of Geology, KSU, assisted Texas. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural with editing the figures. C. Kristof and the entire History, 20: 27–55. Bishop, G. A. 1983b. Two new species of crabs, Interlibrary Loan Staff, Kent State University, pro- Notopocorystes (Eucorystes) eichhorni and vided loans and requests in a timely fashion and Zygastrocarcinus griesi (Decapoda: Brachyura) from helped locate old and obscure literature. the Bearpaw Shale (Campanian) of north-central Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 57: 900–910. 57 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3733041/9780660190938_backmatter.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 Crustaceans.qxd 10/28/03 11:09 AM Page 58 Cretaceous and Eocene Decapod Crustaceans Bishop, G. A. 1985. Fossil decapod crustaceans from the Denmark and Sweden. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Gammon Ferruginous Member, Pierre Shale (Early Museum, 21: 35–46, pl. 10. Campanian), Black Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Collins, J. S. H., and Rasmussen, H. W. 1992. Upper Paleontology, 59: 605–624. Cretaceous Lower Tertiary decapod crustaceans from Bishop, G. A. 1987. Dromiopsis kimberlyae, a new Late West Greenland. Bulletin Grønlands Geologiske Cretaceous crab from the Pierre Shale of South Dakota. Undersøgelse, 162, 46 p. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Collins, J. S. H., and Smith, R. 1992. Ypresian (Lower 100: 35-39. Eocene) crabs (Decapoda, Crustacea) from Belgium. Bishop, G. A. 1988. Two crabs, Xandaros sternbergi Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de (Rathbun, 1926) n. gen., and Icriocarcinus xestos n. Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 63: 261–270. gen., n. sp., from the Late Cretaceous of San Diego Collins, J. S. H., Donovan, S. K., and Dixon, H. L. 1996. County, California, U.S.A., and Baja California Norte, Crabs and barnacles (Crustacea: Decapoda & Mexico. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Cirripedia) from the late Pleistocene Port Mortant Natural History, 21(15): 245–257. Formation of southeast Jamaica. Bulletin of the Bishop, G. A. 1992. A new Cretaceous crab, Diaulax miller- Mizunami Fossil Museum, 23: 51–63. ae (Crustacea: Decapoda), from the northern Atlantic Collins, J. S. H., Fraaye, R. H. B., and Jagt, J. W. M. 1995. Coastal Plain, U. S. A. Proceedings of the Biological Late Cretaceous anomurans and brachyurans from the Society of Washington, 105: 555–561. Maastrichtian type area. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, Bishop, G. A., and Williams, A. B. 1991. Necrocarcinus 40: 165–210. olsonorum, new species, a crab (Decapoda: Calappidae) Collins, J. S. H., Kanie, Y., and Karasawa, H. 1993. Late from the Cretaceous Carlile Shale (Turonian), Western Cretaceous crabs from Japan. Transactions and Interior United States. Journal of Crustacean Biology, Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, 11: 451–459. new series, 172: 292–310. Bittner, A. 1883. Neue Beitäge zur Kenntnis der Crame, J. A. 1992. Evolutionary history of the Polar regions. Brachyurenfauna des Alttertiärs von Vicenza und Historical Biology, 6: 37–60. Verona. Denkschriften Oesterreichische Akademie der Crame, J. A. 1993. Bipolar molluscs and their evolutionary Wissenschaften Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, significance. Journal of Biogeography, 20: 145–161. Wien, 46: 299 316, pl. 1. Crame, J. A. 1996. Evolution of high-latitude molluscan fau- Bittner, A. 1893. Decapoden des pannonischen Tertiärs. nas. In Origin and Evolutionary Radiation of the Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserliche Akademie der Mollusca. Edited by J. Taylor. The Malacological Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematisch- Society of London, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 102: 10–37. 119 131. Blow, W. C., and Manning, R. B. 1996. Preliminary descrip- Dana, J. D. 1852. Crustacea. United States Exploring tions of 25 new decapod crustaceans from the middle Expedition During the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, Eocene of the Carolinas, U.S.A. Tulane Studies in 1842 Under the Command of Charles Wilkes, U. S. N., Geology and Paleontology, 29: 1–26. 13, C. Sherman, Philadelphia, 1620 p. Boschi, E. E. 2000. Species of decapod crustaceans and their Davidson, E. 1966. A new Paleocene crab from Texas. distribution in the American marine zoogeographic Journal of Paleontology, 40: 211–213. provinces. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Davie, P. J. F. 2002. Crustacea: Malacostraca: Eucarida (Part Pesquero, 13: 7–136. 2): Decapoda Anomura, Brachyura. In Zoological Bosquet, J. 1854. Les Crustacés fossiles du Terrain Crétac‚ Catalogue of Australia, Vol. 19.3B. Edited by A. Wells du Limborg. In Verhandelingen uttgegeven door de and W. W. K. Houston. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, commissie belast met het vervaardigen eener beschryv- Australia, 641 pp. ing en kaart van Nederland. Teede deet:1–127. A. C. De Angeli, A., and Beschin, C. 2002. Branchioplax albertii, Kruseman, Haarlem. nuova specie di Goneplacidae (Crustacea, Decapoda) Carter, J. 1872. On Orithopsis Bonneyi, a new fossil crus- dell'Eocene di Cava "Main" di Arzignano (Vicenza- tacean. Geological Magazine, 9: 529–532. Italia Settentrionale). Lavori-Società Veneziana di Checchia-Rispoli, C. 1905. I Crostacei del Eocene dei din- Scienze Naturali, 27: 125–130. tori di Monreale in provincia di Palermo. Giornale delle Deslongchamps, E. E. 1835. Mémoir pour servirà l'histoire Societa Scienze Naturale Economico di Palermo, 25: naturelle des Crustacés fossiles. Mémoires de la Societé 309–325. Linnaean Normandie, 5: 37–46, pl. 1. Collins, J. S. H., and Jakobsen, S. L. 1994. A synopsis of the Desmarest, A. G. 1822. Crustacés Malacostracés. In biostratigraphic distribution of the crab genera Dictionnaire des Sciences naturelles, 28: 138–425, atlas, (Crustacea, Decapoda) of the Danian (Palaeocene) of vol. 4, pl. 1–58. F. G. Levrault
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Palaeocorystoidea and the Phylogeny of Raninoidian Crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Podotremata)
    Zootaxa 3215: 1–216 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 3215 A revision of the Palaeocorystoidea and the phylogeny of raninoidian crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Podotremata) BARRY W.M. VAN BAKEL1, 6, DANIÈLE GUINOT2, PEDRO ARTAL3, RENÉ H.B. FRAAIJE4 & JOHN W.M. JAGT5 1 Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL–5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands; and Nederlands Centrum voor Biodiver- siteit [Naturalis], P.O. Box 9517, NL–2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 2 Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 61 rue Buffon, CP 53, F–75231 Paris Cedex 5, France E-mail: [email protected] 3 Museo Geológico del Seminario de Barcelona, Diputación 231, E–08007 Barcelona, Spain E-mail: [email protected] 4 Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL–5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 5 Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6–7, NL–6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 6 Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by P. Castro: 2 Dec. 2011; published: 29 Feb. 2012 BARRY W.M. VAN BAKEL, DANIÈLE GUINOT, PEDRO ARTAL, RENÉ H.B. FRAAIJE & JOHN W.M. JAGT A revision of the Palaeocorystoidea and the phylogeny of raninoidian crabs (Crustacea, Deca- poda, Brachyura, Podotremata) (Zootaxa 3215) 216 pp.; 30 cm. 29 Feb. 2012 ISBN 978-1-86977-873-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-874-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2012 BY Magnolia Press P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle Guinot
    New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle Guinot To cite this version: Danièle Guinot. New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Geodiversitas, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, 2019, 41 (1), pp.747. 10.5252/geodiversitas2019v41a22. hal-02408863 HAL Id: hal-02408863 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02408863 Submitted on 13 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Changer fig. 19 initiale Inverser les figs 15-16 New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle GUINOT ISYEB (CNRS, MNHN, EPHE, Sorbonne Université), Institut Systématique Évolution Biodiversité, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, case postale 53, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] An epistemological obstacle will encrust any knowledge that is not questioned. Intellectual habits that were once useful and healthy can, in the long run, hamper research Gaston Bachelard, The Formation of the Scientific
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/30/2021 02:14:49PM Via Free Access B.M
    Contributions to Zoology, 72 (2-3) 83-84 (2003) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague An interesting case of homonymy: Notopus de Haan, 1841 (Crustacea, Raninidae; Recent) and Notopus Leonardi, 1983 (ichnofossil; Devonian) ³ Barry+W.M. van Bakel¹, John+W.M. Jagt² & René+H.B. Fraaije 1 2 Schepenhoek 235, NL-5403 GB Uden, the Netherlands; Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de 3 Bosquetplein 6-7, P.O. Box 882, NL-6200 AW Maastricht, the Netherlands; Oertijdmuseum de Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL-5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands Keywords: Homonymy, Crustacea, ichnofossils, Notopus Abstract N. petri, involves an ichnofossil from the Devonian of Paran-, Brazil (Leeonardi, 1983: 236). Leonard! Upper Cretaceous strata in the type area of the Maastrichtian interpreted this as the imprint of the left front limb Stage Netherlands, NE have yielded (SE Belgium) compara- of an amphibian. Roek & Rage (1994), who restudied tively abundant and diverse raninid assemblages (Collins et al., Leonardos .original material, were of the opinion 1995; Fraaye & van Bakel, 1998). To date, seven species are that this ichnofossil taxon did not represent part of known: Eumorphocorystes sculptus, Pseudoraninella muelleri, but rather similar to Lyreidinapyriformis, Raninoides? quadrispinosus,Raniliformis an amphibian trackway, was asteroid chevrona, Raniliformis prebaltica and Raniliformis occlusa. traces of an or ophiuroid, comparable to These Maastricht occur mainly from the portion of the Asteriacites upper the ichnofossil genus von Schlotheim. Formation[Emael, Nekum andMeerssen members, Belemnitella Irrespective of the correct assignment of this junior and Belemnella (Neobelemnella) kazimiroviensis bio- ichnotaxon, Notopus Leonard!, 1983 (non de Haan, zones]. is in need of substitute the 1841) a name, more so with since ichnotaxon names compete (palaeo)zoo- taxa June Introduction logical (A.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 08:33:28AM Via Free Access 224 E
    Contributions to Zoology, 67 (4) 223-235 (1998) SPB Academic Publishing bv, Amsterdam Optics and phylogeny: is there an insight? The evolution of superposition eyes in the Decapoda (Crustacea) Edward Gaten Department of Biology, University’ ofLeicester, Leicester LEI 7RH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Compound eyes, superposition optics, adaptation, evolution, decapod crustaceans, phylogeny Abstract cannot normally be predicted by external exami- nation alone, and usually microscopic investiga- This addresses the of structure and in paper use eye optics the tion of properly fixed optical elements is required construction of and crustacean phylogenies presents an hypoth- for a complete diagnosis. This largely rules out esis for the evolution of in the superposition eyes Decapoda, the use of fossil material in the based the of in comparatively on distribution eye types extant decapod fami- few lies. It that arthropodan specimens where the are is suggested reflecting superposition optics are eyes symplesiomorphic for the Decapoda, having evolved only preserved (Glaessner, 1969), although the optics once, probably in the Devonian. loss of Subsequent reflecting of some species of trilobite have been described has superposition optics occurred following the adoption of a (Clarkson & Levi-Setti, 1975). Also the require- new habitat (e.g. Aristeidae,Aeglidae) or by progenetic paedo- ment for good fixation and the fact that complete morphosis (Paguroidea, Eubrachyura). examination invariably involves the destruction of the specimen means that museum collections Introduction rarely reveal enough information to define the optics unequivocally. Where the optics of the The is one of the compound eye most complex component parts of the eye are under investiga- and remarkable not on of its fixation organs, only account tion, specialised to preserve the refrac- but also for the optical precision, diversity of tive properties must be used (Oaten, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • (Campanian) of the Moyenne Moulouya, Northeast Morocco
    Revista Mexicana de CienciasNew Geológicas, crabs from v. 27,the núm.Upper 2, Cretaceous 2010, p. 213-224 of the Moyenne Moulouya, Morocco 213 New crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda) from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) of the Moyenne Moulouya, northeast Morocco Àlex Ossó-Morales1, Pedro Artal2, and Francisco J. Vega3,* 1 Josep Vicenç Foix, 12-H, 1er-1ª 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain, 2 Museo Geológico del Seminario de Barcelona, Diputación 231, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain. 3 Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Del. Coyoacán, 04510, México D. F., Mexico. * [email protected] ABSTRACT The presence of the genera Costacopluma and Ophthalmoplax in Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Moroccan strata is documented on the basis of specimens collected from the Calcaires à slumps de Taghit Formation, Moyenne Moulouya (Morocco). Two new species are described, Ophthalmoplax minimus and Costacopluma maroccana. The first record for Opthalmoplax in the west Tethyan realm is reported, and systematic affinities of this genus and its species are discussed. An absolute age of the late Campanian was obtained for this assemblage from 87Sr/86Sr analysis applied to well preserved cuticle calcitic remains of Ophthalmoplax minimus. Costacopluma maroccana represents the 14th species for this genus and the fourth Cretaceous species. Its morphology reinforces hypothesis of two main phyletic groups for this genus. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Ophthalmoplax, Costacopluma, Campanian, Morocco. RESUMEN Se documenta la presencia de los géneros Ophthalmoplax y Costacopluma con base en especímenes recolectados en sedimentos del Cretácico Superior (Campaniano) de la Moyenne Mouluya (Marruecos). Se describen dos nuevas especies: Ophthalmoplax minimus y Costacopluma maroccana. Se identifíca y localiza (por primera vez en la parte occidental del dominio del Tethys) el género Ophthalmoplax, discutiéndose las afinidades sistemáticas de este género y sus especies.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an Assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde Biogeographic Marine Ecoregions
    Zootaxa 4413 (3): 401–448 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4413.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DF9255A-7C42-42DA-9F48-2BAA6DCEED7E Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde biogeographic marine ecoregions JOSÉ A. GONZÁLEZ University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, i-UNAT, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-6731. Abstract The complete list of Canarian marine decapods (last update by González & Quiles 2003, popular book) currently com- prises 374 species/subspecies, grouped in 198 genera and 82 families; whereas the Cape Verdean marine decapods (now fully listed for the first time) are represented by 343 species/subspecies with 201 genera and 80 families. Due to changing environmental conditions, in the last decades many subtropical/tropical taxa have reached the coasts of the Canary Islands. Comparing the carcinofaunal composition and their biogeographic components between the Canary and Cape Verde ar- chipelagos would aid in: validating the appropriateness in separating both archipelagos into different ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007), and understanding faunal movements between areas of benthic habitat. The consistency of both ecoregions is here compared and validated by assembling their decapod crustacean checklists, analysing their taxa composition, gath- ering their bathymetric data, and comparing their biogeographic patterns. Four main evidences (i.e. different taxa; diver- gent taxa composition; different composition of biogeographic patterns; different endemicity rates) support that separation, especially in coastal benthic decapods; and these parametres combined would be used as a valuable tool at comparing biotas from oceanic archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Crustaceans in Cold Seep Ecosystems: Fossil Record, Geographic Distribution, Taxonomic Composition, 2 and Biology 3 4 Adiël A
    1 Crustaceans in cold seep ecosystems: fossil record, geographic distribution, taxonomic composition, 2 and biology 3 4 Adiël A. Klompmaker1, Torrey Nyborg2, Jamie Brezina3 & Yusuke Ando4 5 6 1Department of Integrative Biology & Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, 1005 7 Valley Life Sciences Building #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Email: [email protected] 8 9 2Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. 10 Email: [email protected] 11 12 3South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA. Email: 13 [email protected] 14 15 4Mizunami Fossil Museum, 1-47, Yamanouchi, Akeyo-cho, Mizunami, Gifu, 509-6132, Japan. 16 Email: [email protected] 17 18 This preprint has been submitted for publication in the Topics in Geobiology volume “Ancient Methane 19 Seeps and Cognate Communities”. Specimen figures are excluded in this preprint because permissions 20 were only received for the peer-reviewed publication. 21 22 Introduction 23 24 Crustaceans are abundant inhabitants of today’s cold seep environments (Chevaldonné and Olu 1996; 25 Martin and Haney 2005; Karanovic and Brandão 2015), and could play an important role in structuring 26 seep ecosystems. Cold seeps fluids provide an additional source of energy for various sulfide- and 27 hydrocarbon-harvesting bacteria, often in symbiosis with invertebrates, attracting a variety of other 28 organisms including crustaceans (e.g., Levin 2005; Vanreusel et al. 2009; Vrijenhoek 2013). The 29 percentage of crustaceans of all macrofaunal specimens is highly variable locally in modern seeps, from 30 0–>50% (Dando et al. 1991; Levin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Classification of the Xanthoidea Sensu Lato
    Contributions to Zoology, 75 (1/2) 23-73 (2006) A new classifi cation of the Xanthoidea sensu lato (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) based on phylogenetic analysis and traditional systematics and evaluation of all fossil Xanthoidea sensu lato Hiroaki Karasawa1, Carrie E. Schweitzer2 1Mizunami Fossil Museum, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu 509-6132, Japan, e-mail: GHA06103@nifty. com; 2Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthoidea, Portunidae, systematics, phylogeny Abstract Family Pilumnidae ............................................................. 47 Family Pseudorhombilidae ............................................... 49 A phylogenetic analysis was conducted including representatives Family Trapeziidae ............................................................. 49 from all recognized extant and extinct families of the Xanthoidea Family Xanthidae ............................................................... 50 sensu lato, resulting in one new family, Hypothalassiidae. Four Superfamily Xanthoidea incertae sedis ............................... 50 xanthoid families are elevated to superfamily status, resulting in Superfamily Eriphioidea ......................................................... 51 Carpilioidea, Pilumnoidoidea, Eriphioidea, Progeryonoidea, and Family Platyxanthidae ....................................................... 52 Goneplacoidea, and numerous subfamilies are elevated
    [Show full text]
  • Notopus Dorsipes (Linnaeus) in Singapore: First Record of the Brachyuran Superfamily Raninoidea (Crustacea: Decapoda) on the Sunda Shelf
    NATURE IN SINGAPORE 2012 5: 19–25 Date of Publication: 27 January 2012 © National University of Singapore NOTOPUS DORSIPES (LINNAEUS) IN SINGAPORE: FIRST RECORD OF THE BRACHYURAN SUPERFAMILY RANINOIDEA (CRUSTACEA: DECAPODA) ON THE SUNDA SHELF Martyn E. Y. Low1* and S. K. Tan2 1Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Graduate School of Engineering and Science University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan 2Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, National University of Singapore 6 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117546, Republic of Singapore (*Corresponding author: [email protected]) INTRODUCTION Recently, a brachyuran crab identified as Notopus dorsipes (Linnaeus, 1758), was found at Changi (north-east Singapore). This represents the first record of the superfamily Raninoidea de Haan, 1839, in Singapore and on the Sunda Shelf (Figs. 1, 2). The superfamily Raninoidea has a worldwide distribution and its members inhabit marine habitats from the intertidal zone to over 300 m deep (reviewed in Ahyong et al., 2009; see also Dawson & Yaldwyn, 1994). Fifty species of raninoids are currently assigned to 12 genera in six subfamilies (Ng et al., 2008). Notopus dorsipes belongs to a monotypic genus currently assigned to the subfamily Notopodinae Serène & Umali, 1972 (see Ng et al., 2008). Originally described as Cancer dorsipes by Linnaeus (1758), this species has had a confused nomenclatural history (see Holthuis, 1962). In order to stabilise the name Cancer dorsipes Linnaeus, Holthuis (1962: 55) designated a figure in Rumphius (1705: pl. 10: Fig. 3) as the lectotype of Notopus dorsipes (reproduced as Fig. 3). De Haan (1841) established the genus Notopus for Cancer dorsipes Linnaeus, the type species by monotypy.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Become a Crab: Phenotypic Constraints on a Recurring Body Plan
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 25 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0664.v1 How to become a crab: Phenotypic constraints on a recurring body plan Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Javier Luque1,2,3, Heather D. Bracken-Grissom4 1 Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa–Ancon, 0843–03092, Panama, Panama 3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA 4 Institute of Environment and Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, 3000 NE 151 Street, North Miami, FL 33181, USA * E-mail: [email protected] Summary: A fundamental question in biology is whether phenotypes can be predicted by ecological or genomic rules. For over 140 years, convergent evolution of the crab-like body plan (with a wide and flattened shape, and a bent abdomen) at least five times in decapod crustaceans has been known as ‘carcinization’. The repeated loss of this body plan has been identified as ‘decarcinization’. We offer phylogenetic strategies to include poorly known groups, and direct evidence from fossils, that will resolve the pattern of crab evolution and the degree of phenotypic variation within crabs. Proposed ecological advantages of the crab body are summarized into a hypothesis of phenotypic integration suggesting correlated evolution of the carapace shape and abdomen. Our premise provides fertile ground for future studies of the genomic and developmental basis, and the predictability, of the crab-like body form. Keywords: Crustacea, Anomura, Brachyura, Carcinization, Phylogeny, Convergent evolution, Morphological integration 1 © 2020 by the author(s).
    [Show full text]