DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Map of the Lacey 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Thurston County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Map of the Lacey 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Thurston County WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES OPEN FILE REPORT 2003-9 Division of Geology and Earth Resources 18 16 Ron Teissere - State Geologist VARIATIONS O/ O 2.0 2 16 6 12 20 1.5 18 10 4 8 1.0 14 8 ft Qgof Qgt 0.5 10 ft Qga 3 Qgas Beta No. 143971 122°52¢30² R 2 W R 1 W 122°45¢ 0 47°07¢30² 47°07¢30² >45,700 yr B.P. 14 Qgof Qgt Qga C age in wood 5b 5d Qga Sandy NISQUALLY REACH -0.5 peat PPPP 21 63rd Ave NE O VARIATIONS Qga Point 17 19 Qgt Qpg 18 Woodard Big Slough Beta No. 143031 d -1.0 47 ft Qps 5a 5c Woodard Bay Rd Bay Qb >46,970 yr B.P. 13 15 Qps 14C age in peat HENDERSON INLET Qp -1.5 Qmw 1 7 Qgof 11 Puget Beach Road Qgas Butterball 9 19 Tolmie Qb tephra XXXX -2.0 24 Qgof Cove (in standard deviation units about a zero mean) Qa 20 State Park 5e Qgof 22 23 Qmw 21 10 ft Qpg -2.5 Qp Qp Qp base of bluff Qps 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Qga TIME (K years ago) Puget Road Qgic Qp Qgof Qmw Qmw Figure 2. Outcrop of tephra interbedded with unit Qps at Butterball Cove. Chemical analysis Figure 1. Marine oxygen-isotope stages (from Morrison, 1991). The numbers within the graph are stage numbers; the even- Qgt 24 at three different laboratories identified this tephra as probably from Mount St. Helens, numbered peaks (at top) are glacial maxima and the odd-numbered troughs (at bottom) are interglacial minima. The blue areas Qmw Qgt Qgo although a specific match could not be positively identified. indicate interglacial episodes, based on a cutoff at -0.5 δ18O oxygen-isotope values (equivalent to Holocene interglacial values). 56th Ave NE Qb Woodard Qp Qp Qa Qgo Qga Qa Qgt Qmw Beachcrest 37 Qps Qgof Johnson Point Road Qgof Qp 25 30 28 27 Qgic Qgo Geologic Map of the Lacey 7.5-minute Quadrangle, 26 25 Qgt Qgof Lemon Road Qgos Qgt Schinke Road Qgt Thurston County, Washington Qp Marvin Road Qp 29 Qp by Robert L. Logan, Timothy J. Walsh, Henry W. Schasse, and Michael Polenz Qgo 46th Ave NE Qgof Qgof 2003 Sleater- Kinney Road Sleater- Qgt Qp Bay 37 Qgof Qa Qgt INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS OLDER THAN VASHON DRIFT Qgof Qp Qp 31 32 34 33 35 36 The Lacey quadrangle is located at the south end of Puget Sound in Thurston Support for identification of tephra was provided by Franklin F. Foit, Jr. Qps Pre-Vashon sand-size or finer deposits—Massive to cross-bedded Qp 36 County and includes most of the city of Lacey and part of the city of Olympia. (Wash. State Univ.) and Andrei M. Sarna-Wojcicki and Thomas W. Sisson Qps Qgt Qgt sand interbedded with laminated silt and minor peat, diatomite, and Land use is primarily urban, industrial, or low-density residential. (U.S. Geological Survey). We have also benefited greatly from discussions with gravel; immediately subjacent to Vashon Drift and generally Qp Qp Derek Booth and Kathy Troost (Univ. of Wash.) and Ray Wells and Brian overlying unit Qpg. This unit is thought to be of nonglacial origin, Qp Woodar Hawks Prairie Road GEOLOGIC HISTORY Sherrod (U.S. Geological Survey). This map is supported by the National Qgt and is dominated by varied Cascade-source volcanic lithic rock types. Qp Qgt Geologic Mapping Program under Cooperative Agreement No. 02HQAG0047 Libby Road Qa Late Wisconsinan–age Vashon Drift covers most of the quadrangle. Pre-Vashon These sediments have previously been referred to the Kitsap d with the U.S. Geological Survey. units are generally exposed only along coastal bluffs, where mass wasting is Formation and were inferred to be of Olympia age, although all known deposits in the south Puget Lowland are older than the type T 19 N 36th Ave NE common. Landslides and colluvium disrupt and obscure the continuity of Qgt T 19 N DESCRIPTION OF UNITS T 18 N exposures so that pre-Vashon geologic history is not easily deciphered. In the section of the Olympia nonglacial interval (Armstrong and others, 1 T 18 N Qgof south Puget Lowland (south of Tacoma), all finite radiocarbon ages reported Quaternary Unconsolidated Deposits 1965) and most are radiocarbon-infinite or suspect. Two radiocarbon South Carpenter Road Qgo samples were obtained from the cliff exposure that is detailed in the Qgos Bay before 1966 are suspect due to laboratory contamination (Fairhall and others, Qp HOLOCENE NONGLACIAL DEPOSITS stratigraphic column next to Figure 2. Deeter (1979) has shown that 37 Trail 1966, p. 501). Stratigraphic assignments based on these invalid radiocarbon ages Qp are now questionable and need to be re-evaluated. We have systematically the type locality of the Kitsap Formation includes radiocarbon- Qp Qgt Qf Fill—Clay, silt, sand, gravel, organic matter, rip-rap, and debris; infinite sediments of both glacial and nonglacial origin, and we Qgos 31st Ave NE sampled all datable material from nonglacial sediments subjacent to the Vashon Qf Qp includes engineered and non-engineered fills; shown only where fill follow his suggestion that the name be abandoned. Because we Qgt Marvin Road Drift and found them to be older than previously reported. With a few Friendly Grove Road Qgof placement is extensive, sufficiently thick to be of geotechnical cannot establish that all pre-Vashon nonglacial sediments are 6 Woodland exceptions, these sediments have been beyond the range of radiocarbon dating. Qp significance, and readily verifiable. correlative, we have chosen not to assign them a stratigraphic name. 5 The antiquity of the pre-Vashon units causes radiocarbon dating to be of Qgo 3 2 1 67 4 little help for making correlations, and abrupt facies changes within glacial and Qp Qgt Qml Modified land—Soil, sediment, or other geologic material that has Qpg Pre-Vashon gravel—Gravel and sand, generally of mixed northern Qp Qml Qpg nonglacial units also render correlations tenuous. Despite these difficulties, we been locally reworked to modify the topography by excavation and and Cascade Range provenance; moderately to poorly sorted; Road have developed a conceptual model for the more recent pre-Vashon geologic 36 (or) redistribution. commonly cross bedded but may lack primary sedimentary Qgos Qgos Qgt Qp Creek history that is consistent with our observations but by no means compelling. structures; commonly tinted orange with iron-oxide staining; South Bay QpRoad The oxygen-isotope stage 4 glaciation, called the Possession Glaciation in Bay Qa Alluvium—Silt, sand, gravel, and peat deposited in stream beds and stratigraphically underlying the Vashon Drift; most commonly the northern Puget Lowland, was mild relative to stages 2 and 6 (Mix, 1987; Qa Qgt Qp estuaries; may include some lacustrine and beach deposits. exposed immediately beneath exposures of unit Qps; gravelly 26th Ave NE Creek Fig. 1), which are represented in the Puget Lowland by the Vashon and Double portions of unit Qpg are relatively resistant to erosion; inferred to be Bluff Drifts respectively. The Possession ice sheet probably did not extend far Qb Beach deposits—Mud and sand deposited in the intertidal zone or Hawks Prairie of glacial origin because interglacial conditions do not appear Qp Qgos Hogum south of Seattle (Lea, 1984; Troost, 1999). Because the ice sheet blocked Qb Qp Qgo Qml residual gravel on a wave-cut platform. conducive to streams with sufficient competency to deposit drainage out of Puget Sound to the Strait of Juan de Fuca, a proglacial lake was widespread gravels in most of the Puget Lowland and because the impounded in most of the southern Puget Lowland. Streams flowing into this Q mw Colluvium—Loose soil and glacial sand and gravel deposited by soil Setchfield Qf Qgt Qga Qmw majority of the exposures include northern-source metamorphic rock Lake lake, such as the Nisqually, Puyallup, and Skokomish Rivers, formed an alluvial creep and shallow ravelling on hillslopes, some of which occurred 40 clasts. Qp plain and deltas grading to lake level. These nonglacial sediments, deposited during the waning stages of the Vashon Stade of the Fraser 64 Qf Qgt during stage 4, are all radiocarbon-infinite and overlie and interfinger with Glaciation. Shown where colluvium is of sufficient thickness to mask 7 8 9 Qf REFERENCES CITED Qp Qga 10 11 Possession outwash deposits. Once Possession ice no longer impounded the lake underlying geologic strata. 12 Draham St (but sea level was still significantly below modern sea level), existing drainages, Armstrong, J. E.; Crandell, D. R.; Easterbrook, D. J.; Noble, J. B., 1965, Late 5 Qp Peat—Organic and organic-matter-rich mineral sediments deposited such as the Nisqually and Puyallup Rivers, deeply and rapidly incised into their Qp Pleistocene stratigraphy and chronology in southwestern British Columbia Bigelow in closed depressions; includes peat, muck, silt, and clay in and Lake former alluvial plains and became entrenched. At least initially, stage 3, called and northwestern Washington: Geological Society of America Bulletin, 15th Ave NE Thompson the Olympia Interglaciation locally (Armstrong and others, 1965), was adjacent to wetlands. Carpenter Road Place v. 76, no. 3, p. 321-330. Qgt characterized by downcutting and erosion. As sea level began to rise, most deposition was confined to the entrenched channels. Because stage 3 sea level Bodle, T. R., 1992, Microzoning the likelihood of strong spectral amplification Qp Qgt PLEISTOCENE GLACIAL DEPOSITS Qgo was probably about 100 ft lower than modern sea level (Ludwig and others, of earthquake motions using MMI surveys and surface geology: Earthquake Qp Spectra, v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Tacoma Way, Circa 1913, Photo Courtesy of the Tacoma Public Library, Amzie D
    The west side of the 5200 block of South Tacoma Way, circa 1913, photo courtesy of the Tacoma Public Library, Amzie D. Browning Collection 158 2 011 Historic South Tacoma Way South Tacoma Way Business District In early 2011, Historic Tacoma reached out to the 60+ member South Tacoma Business District Association as part of its new neighborhood initiative. The area is home to one of the city’s most intact historic commercial business districts. A new commuter rail station is due to open in 2012, business owners are interested in S 52nd St taking advantage of City loan and grant programs for façade improvements, and Historic Tacoma sees S Washington St great opportunities in partnering with the district. S Puget Sound Ave The goals of the South Tacoma project are to identify and assess historic structures and then to partner with business owners and the City of Tacoma to conserve and revitalize the historic core of the South Tacoma Business District. The 2011 work plan includes: • conducting a detailed inventory of approximately 50 commercial structures in the historic center of the district • identification of significant and endangered South Way Tacoma properties in the district • development of action plans for endangered properties • production of a “historic preservation resource guide for community leaders” which can be S 54th St used by community groups across the City • ½ day design workshop for commercial property owners • production & distribution of a South Tacoma Business District tour guide and map • nominations to the Tacoma Register of Historic Places as requested by property owners • summer walking tour of the district Acknowledgements Project funding provided by Historic Tacoma, the South Tacoma Business District Association, the South Tacoma Neighborhood Council, the University of Washington-Tacoma, and Jim and Karen Rich.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation
    South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation Dr. Timothy Stokes President September, 2014 Table of Contents Report on Year One Recommendation ......................................................................................................... 1 Mission .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Mission Fulfillment .................................................................................................................................... 1 Operational Planning ................................................................................................................................ 2 Core Themes, Objectives and Indicators .................................................................................................. 3 Part II ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Rationale for Indicators of Achievement .................................................................................................. 5 Increase Student Retention (Objective 1.A) ......................................................................................... 5 Support Student Completion (Objective 1.B) ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Appendices
    APPENDIX A Detailed Stormwater Goals and Policies DETAILED STORMWATER GOALS AND POLICIES City staff developed long-term goals for each SWMP program element below. Program elements are a comprehensive list of functions performed or influenced by the SWMP. This Appendix lists policies from the previous Stormwater Comprehensive Plan developed in 2013 (SCP 2013) related to each long-term goal. Policies that apply to multiple program elements are indicated with an asterisk. Flood Reduction: There is no flooding of the public stormwater system due to large storm events. FC1. Comply with all applicable requirements from federal, state, Thurston County, and City of Lacey related to flood protection FC2. Develop new drainage projects for the CIP plan to address flooding problems when these problems cannot be addressed through maintenance of the existing infrastructure FC3. Continue to encourage and allow the use of LID stormwater Best Management Practices for flow control for new development and redevelopment in accordance with current regulations * FC4. Provide adequate stormwater conveyance in the public storm drain system as follows: Accommodate the 10-year 24-hour event from existing development within the public storm drain system, except as noted in the three bullets below Accommodate the 25-year 24-hour event from existing development for storm drains and culverts that pass under public roads Accommodate the 25-year 24-hour event from existing development within the long term UGA boundary public right-of-way without having water over more than 50 percent of the driving lane Accommodate the 100-year 24-hour event from existing development for culverts and bridges that convey natural channels Surface Water Quality Improvement: All surface water bodies in Lacey meet water quality criteria for designated recreation and fish uses.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008
    Thurston County Public Health and Social Services Department Environmental Health Division On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Table of Contents: Section Page Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 On-site Sewage System Management Plan 8 Part I – Database Enhancement 10 Part 2 – Identification of Sensitive Areas 16 Part 3 – Operation, Monitoring and Maintenance in Sensitive Areas 28 Part 4 – Marine Recovery and Sensitive Area Strategy 34 Part 5 – Education 39 Part 6 – Plan Summary 42 Appendices A – Amanda Reports 53 B – Henderson Watershed Protection Area Description 58 C – Process for Evaluation of Potential MRA’s and LMA’s 62 D – Marine Recovery Area and Local Management Area Designation Tool 63 E – Measurable Outcomes 70 F – Thurston County Septic Park 71 Page 2 of 71 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Acknowledgements Thurston County Public Health and Social Services would like to acknowledge all those who have been instrumental in our process to develop our Local Management Plan (LMA). First of all we appreciate the contributions of the Article IV Advisory Committee in assisting the Environmental Health Division. Your dedication to providing direction and tone for the LMA has been invaluable. We would also like to recognize the Environmental Health, Development Services and Geodata staff for supplying input, recommendations and attending committee meetings to offer insight into our program areas. Our appreciation is also extended to the Washington State Department of Health. We are grateful for their staff support and funding. We especially appreciate the use of the guidance document, which has provided section descriptions and format for our plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits
    PNNL-17161 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits Z Yang TP Khangaonkar December 2007 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Prairies the Nature Conservancy of Washington 2007 Conservation Vision
    Conservation Action Planning Report for the SOUTH PUGET SOUND PRAIRIES The Nature Conservancy of Washington 2007 CONSERVATION VISION Successful conservation of the South Puget Sound Prairies will entail elements of protection, active land management and restoration, and integration of the full suite of partners working within the Willamette Valley - Puget Trough - Georgia Basin Ecoregion. The portfolio of protected conservation sites will contain a mosaic of habitats that support the full-range of prairie and oak woodland species. This portfolio will be a total of 20 protected sites, including at least six core areas. The core areas of the portfolio consist of protected sites embedded within a mosaic of land-use that complements prairie conservation and the protected conservation sites. The portfolio will take advantage of the wide-range of microclimates in the South Puget Sound, aimed at providing resiliency to the potential effects of climate change. The South Puget Sound will contribute to the conservation of rare species by promoting and implementing recovery actions throughout their historic range. Active management of the prairie maximizes the contribution to conservation of all portfolio sites. These management actions are coordinated and integrated across a range of partners and landowners. This integration ensures that information transfer is exemplary, that organizations are linked formally and informally and that sufficient resources are generated for all partners. The South Puget Sound Prairies will be a primary source for prairie-specific science and restoration techniques. It will similarly be a source concerning the science and conservation for fragmented natural systems. Prairie conservation in the South Puget Sound will be supported by a community that is actively engaged through a vigorous volunteer program and supports the financial and policy issues that affect prairies.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report
    Final Draft THURSTON COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE Inventory and Characterization Report SMA Grant Agreements: G0800104 and G1300026 June 30, 2013 Prepared By: Thurston County Planning Department Building # 1, 2nd Floor 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW Olympia, WA 98502-6045 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 REPORT PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATES FOR CITIES WITHIN THURSTON COUNTY ...................................................................... 2 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 2 SHORELINE JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 DETERMINING SHORELINE JURISDICTION LIMITS ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006
    South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006 Making connections and building partnerships to protect the marine waters, streams, and watersheds of Nisqually, Henderson, Budd, Eld and Totten Inlets The economic vitality of South Puget Sound is intricately linked to the environmental health of the Sound’s marine waters, streams, and watersheds. It’s hard to imagine the South Sound without annual events on or near the water - Harbor Days Tugboat Races, Wooden Boat Fair, Nisqually Watershed Festival, Swantown BoatSwap and Chowder Challenge, Parade of Lighted Ships – and other activities we prize such as beachcombing, boating, fishing, or simply enjoying a cool breeze at a favorite restaurant or park. South Sound is a haven for relaxation and recreation. Businesses such as shellfish growers and tribal fisheries, tourism, water recreational boating, marinas, port-related businesses, development and real estate all directly depend on the health of the South Sound. With strong contributions from the South Sound, statewide commercial harvest of shellfish draws in over 100 million dollars each year. Fishing, boating, travel and tourism are all vibrant elements in the region’s base economy, with over 80 percent of the state’s tourism and travel dollars generated in the Puget Sound Region. Many other businesses benefit indirectly. Excellent quality of life is an attractor for great employees, and the South Puget Sound has much to offer! The South Puget Sound Forum, held in Olympia on April 29, 2006, provided an opportunity to rediscover the connections between economic vitality and the health of South Puget Sound, and to take action to protect the valuable resources of the five inlets at the headwaters of the Puget Sound Basin – Totten, Eld, Budd, Henderson, and the Nisqually Reach.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Eye of the European Beholder Maritime History of Olympia And
    Number 3 August 2017 Olympia: In the Eye of the European Beholder Maritime History of Olympia and South Puget Sound Mining Coal: An Important Thurston County Industry 100 Years Ago $5.00 THURSTON COUNTY HISTORICAL JOURNAL The Thurston County Historical Journal is dedicated to recording and celebrating the history of Thurston County. The Journal is published by the Olympia Tumwater Foundation as a joint enterprise with the following entities: City of Lacey, City of Olympia, City of Tumwater, Daughters of the American Revolution, Daughters of the Pioneers of Washington/Olympia Chapter, Lacey Historical Society, Old Brewhouse Foundation, Olympia Historical Society and Bigelow House Museum, South Sound Maritime Heritage Association, Thurston County, Tumwater Historical Association, Yelm Prairie Historical Society, and individual donors. Publisher Editor Olympia Tumwater Foundation Karen L. Johnson John Freedman, Executive Director 360-890-2299 Katie Hurley, President, Board of Trustees [email protected] 110 Deschutes Parkway SW P.O. Box 4098 Editorial Committee Tumwater, Washington 98501 Drew W. Crooks 360-943-2550 Janine Gates James S. Hannum, M.D. Erin Quinn Valcho Submission Guidelines The Journal welcomes factual articles dealing with any aspect of Thurston County history. Please contact the editor before submitting an article to determine its suitability for publica- tion. Articles on previously unexplored topics, new interpretations of well-known topics, and personal recollections are preferred. Articles may range in length from 100 words to 10,000 words, and should include source notes and suggested illustrations. Submitted articles will be reviewed by the editorial committee and, if chosen for publication, will be fact-checked and may be edited for length and content.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Puget Sound Update Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team
    2000 Puget Sound update Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Seventh Report of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program March 2000 Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team P.O. Box 40900 Olympia,Washington 98504-0900 360/407-7300 or 800/54-SOUND http://www.wa.gov/puget_sound The Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team is an equal opportunity employer. If you have special accommodation needs, or need this document in an alternative format, please contact the Action Team’s ADA representative at (360) 407-7300. The Action Team’s TDD number is 1 (800) 833-6388. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is the product of the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program and the Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team. Prepared by Action Team staff. Compiled and written by Scott Redman and Lori Scinto. Edited by Melissa Pearlman. Layout and graphics by Toni Weyman Droscher and Jill Williams. The PSAMP Steering and Management committees directed the development of this report. The members of these committees and the following people contributed material, comments and advice. Their contributions were essential to the development of this document. Shelly Ament, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Armstrong Ken Balcomb, Center for Whale Research Greg Bargmann, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Allison Beckett, Washington Department of Ecology John Calambokidis, Cascadia Research Collective Liz Carr, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Denise Clifford, Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Wayne Clifford, Washington Department of Health Andrea
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence 4.1.1 Robert L. Mcdonald and Lee
    Correspondence 4.1.1 Robert L. McDonald and Lee Swoboda submitted applications for the Hood Canal Coordinating Council Citizens Advisory Group. 4.1.2 Robert McDonald submitted an application for the Housing Authority Board. 4.1.3 Liquor Control Board submitted a marijuana license application for Mayflower Partners and a special occasion license for Rotary Club of South Puget Sound. 4.1.4 Economic Development Council of Mason County submitted their first quarter report. Background: Correspondence received in the Commissioners' office. Recommended Action: None Attachments: Originals on file with the Clerk of the Board. 04-14-15 cc: CMMRS Neatherlin, Sheldon & Jeffreys Clerk ~l\..~ W~ MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 411 NORTH FIFTH STREET C<fP !fr~ · SHEL TON WA 98584 Fax 3601427-8437; Voice 3601427-9670, Ext. 419 MASON COUNTY ... f~~mlM~ POINTMENTTO fki,J.. CO.'no\ Cco\(\\wx:ilijj CbvYlcl \ c_,+~~t>V\ {4c\v,'.SO~G-0 vp D BOARD D COMMITTEE COUNCIL .> ADDRI PHONE CITY/2 WORK C/88( EmMAIL r············C·O·MM.UN.ir< ..s .ERvi«;·E····......... ........... r.E·M·PLOY·M-EN·T·;···(·i·F···RET·i·RE·D:· PREVIOUS I 1AcT1v1T1EsoRMEMBERsH1Ps1 i EXPERIENCE>Ovrwri-10 vvie,mp/&~ ls-1. Daw{ftepl>;Co~/ ch!kqf) COMPANY:,l!JbM lbw YRS IJ6d z ! _ 5°'{00..(v/"1 Btlv't:.or:fl"onrrl pro 0 r~,.,..->s I }.J)\//:; 1/Vo ,.. G~ POSITION: won:--hovfG, l0vb C!r?:;J..- 1 dcJ ~1d ,?/rtXtfr? +~an3 , co~ANY: G-\."j"- f&lonJ1ia YRS I+-' i i ~~ G~ i i PO ION: !JyJinberjf hum.fol ~f;rr;/-IOh 4ew : L.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sound Strategy
    SOUTH SOUND STRATEGY Draft 12-30-16 South Sound Strategy – 0 CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 8 Focus Areas ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Education and Outreach ....................................................................................................................... 9 Adaptive Management ........................................................................................................................ 10 How to Use the South Sound Strategy ................................................................................................ 10 II. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Vision for the South Sound Strategy ................................................................................................... 11 Purpose of the South Sound Strategy ................................................................................................. 11 South Puget Sound Overview .............................................................................................................. 11 South Puget Sound Near Term Actions ............................................................................................... 14 South Puget Sound Assessment Units ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]