DOCSLIB.ORG

HENRIK SELIN Associate Professor Frederick S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HENRIK SELIN Associate Professor Frederick S HENRIK SELIN Associate Professor Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies Boston University 154 Bay State Road Boston, MA 02215 USA Phone: +1-617-358-2590, Fax: +1-617-353-9290, E-mail: [email protected] Web: http:// blogs.bu.edu/selin/ PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2014- Associate Professor, Frederick S. Pardee School of GloBal Studies, Boston University 2010-14 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Boston University 2004-10 Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Boston University 2003-04 Associate, Center for International Development, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 2003 Lecturer, Department of International Relations, Boston University 2001-03 Associate, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 2001-03 Research Fellow, Research and Assessment Systems for SustainaBility Program, Harvard University 2001-04 WallenBerg Postdoctoral Fellow in Environment and SustainaBility, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2000-01 Lecturer, Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping University EDUCATION 1995-00 PhD, Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University 1991-95 BA/MA, Department of Political Science, Lund University PUBLICATIONS Books 5. H. Selin and N. E. Selin. 2020. Mercury Stories: Understanding Sustainability through a Volatile Element. CamBridge: MIT Press. 4. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2015. European Union and Environmental Governance. New York: Routledge [Reviewed in Political Studies Review 14(3): 481; Review of Policy Research 33(2): 224-226; Energy Research & Social Science 14: 133-134] 3. H. Selin. 2010. Global Governance of Hazardous Chemicals: Challenges of Multilevel Management. CamBridge: MIT Press [Reviewed in Environmental Politics 21(3): 536-538; Review of European Community & International Environment Law 20(3): 325-326; International Journal of Environmental Studies 68(2): 253-255; Review of Policy Research 28(3): 309-310; Environment International 37(3): 654-655; Perspectives on Politics 9(1): 101-103; Environment 53(1): 42-43; Global Environmental Politics 11(1): 116-118; CHOICE 48(1): 277; Ecological Economics 69(12): 2645-2646] - Runner-Up for the 2011 Harold and Margaret Sprout Award given by the International Studies Association Environmental Studies Section 2. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer (eds.) 2009. Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking and Multilevel Governance. Cambridge: MIT Press [Reviewed in Carbon & Climate Law Review 1(6): 89-91; Climate Policy 11(6): 1386-1388; Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92(4): 493-494; Electronic Green Journal 1(30)] 1. M. A. Schreurs, H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer (eds.) 2009. Transatlantic Environment and Energy Politics: Comparative and International Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate [Reviewed in Journal of Transatlantic Studies 9(2): 175-176; Review of Policy Research 27(3): 338-340] Curriculum Vitae, March 2020, page 1 Articles 24. C. Y. Chen, C. T. Driscoll, C. A. Eagles-Smith, C. S. Eckley, D. A. Gay, H. Hsu-Kim, S. E. Keane, J. L. Kirk, R. P. Mason, D. Obrist, H. Selin, N. E. Selin and M. Thompson. 2018. A Critical Time For Mercury Science To Inform GloBal Policy. Environmental Science & Technology 52(17): 9556-9561 [Selected second runner-up in the best ES&T paper in 2018 in the Feature category] 23. H. Selin, S. E. Keane, S. Wang, N. E. Selin, K. Davis and D. Bally. 2018. Linking Science and Policy To Support the Implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Ambio 47(2): 198-215 22. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2015. Broader, Deeper and Greener: European Union Environmental Politics, Policies, and Outcomes. Annual Review of Environment and Recourses 40: 309-335 21. H. Selin. 2014. GloBal Environmental Law and Treaty-Making on Hazardous SuBstances: The Minamata Convention and Mercury ABatement. Global Environmental Politics 14(1): 1-19 20. B-O Linnér and H. Selin. 2013. The United Nations Conference on SustainaBle Development: Forty Years in the Making. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 31(6): 971-987 [Also co-editor of Special Issue] 19. H. Bulkeley, A. Jordan, R. Perkins and H. Selin. 2013. Governing SustainaBility: Rio+20 and the Road Beyond. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 31(6): 958-970 [Also co-editor of Special Issue] 18. H. Selin. 2012. GloBal Environmental Governance and Regional Centers. Global Environmental Politics 12(3): 18-37 17. K. Sippl and H. Selin. 2012. GloBal Policy For Local Livelihoods: Phasing Out Mercury From Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. Environment: Science and Policy For Sustainable Development 54(3): 18-29 16. A. Najam and H. Selin. 2011. Institutions for a Green Economy. Review of Policy Research 28(5): 451- 457 [Also co-editor of Symposium Section] 15. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2011. Climate Change Regionalism in North America. Review of Policy Research 28(3): 295-304 14. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2011. US Climate Change Politics and Policymaking. Climate Change (Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews) 2(1): 121-127 13. H. Selin and N. E. Selin. 2008. Indigenous Peoples in International Environmental Cooperation: Arctic Management of Hazardous SuBstances. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 17(1): 72-83 12. H. Selin. 2007. Coalition Politics and Chemicals Management in a Regulatory AmBitious Europe. Global Environmental Politics 7(3): 63-93 11. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2007. Political Science and Prediction: What’s Next for U.S. Climate Change Policy?. Review of Policy Research 24(1): 1-27 10. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2006. Raising GloBal Standards: Hazardous SuBstances and E-Waste Management in the European Union. Environment: Science and Policy For Sustainable Development 48(10): 6-18 [Re-printed in: M. V. Russo (ed.). 2008. Environmental Management: Readings and Cases. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2nd edition; C. A. Bily (ed.). 2009. At Issue: What Is the Impact of E-Waste? Farmington Hills: Greenhaven Press] 9. N. E. Selin and H. Selin. 2006. GloBal Politics of Mercury Pollution: The Need for Multi-Scale Governance. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 15(3): 258-269 8. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2005. Canadian-U.S. Environmental Cooperation: Climate Change Networks and Regional Action. The American Review of Canadian Studies 35(2): 353-378 Curriculum Vitae, March 2020, page 2 7. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2004. Baltic Sea Hazardous SuBstances Management: Results and Challenges. Ambio 33(3): 153-160 [also translated into Chinese] 6. N. Eckley and H. Selin. 2004. All Talk, Little Action: Precaution and its Effects on European Chemicals Regulation. Journal of European Public Policy 11(1): 78-105 5. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2003. Mapping Institutional Linkages in European Air Pollution Politics. Global Environmental Politics 3(3): 14-46 4. B. L. Turner II, P. Matson, J. J. McCarthy, R. W. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, G. Hovelsrud-Broda, J. X. Kasperson, R. E. Kasperson, A. Luers, M. L. Martello, S. Mathiesen, R. Naylor, C. Polsky, A. Pulsipher, A. Schiller, H. Selin and N. Tyler. 2003. Illustrating the Coupled Human-Environment System for VulneraBility Analysis: Three Case Studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14): 8080-8085 3. H. Selin and N. Eckley. 2003. Science, Politics, and Persistent Organic Pollutants: Scientific Assessments and their Role in International Environmental Negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 3(1): 17-42 2. J. Krueger and H. Selin. 2002. Governance for Sound Chemicals Management: The Need for a More Comprehensive GloBal Strategy. Global Governance 8(3): 323-342 1. H. Selin and O. Hjelm. 1999. The Role of Environmental Science and Politics in Identifying Persistent Organic Pollutants for International Regulatory Actions. Environmental Reviews 7(2): 61-68 Book Chapters 27. H. Selin. 2020. "GloBal Politics and Policy of Hazardous Substances" in R. Axelrod and S. D. VanDeveer (eds.) Global Environmental Policy: Institutions, Law and Policy. Washington D.C.: CQ Press/SAGE, 5th edition, pp 305-331 [Latest revised chapter from inclusion in also the 2015 4th edition and the 2010 3rd edition] 26. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2019. "GloBal Climate Change Governance: Where To Go After Paris?" in N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft (eds.) Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, 10th edition. Washington DC: CQ Press, pp 322-346 [Latest revised chapter from inclusion in also the 2016 9th edition, the 2013 8th edition, and the 2010 7th edition] 25. H. Selin. 2017. "GloBal Environmental Governance and Treaty-Making: The Arctic’s Fragmented Voice" in K. Keil and S. Knecht (eds.) Governing Arctic Change: Global Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 101-120 24. H. Selin. 2014. "Hazardous Wastes" in P. Harris (ed.) Routledge HandbooK of Global Environment Politics. New York: Routledge, pp 427-438 23. H. Selin. 2013. "GloBal Chemicals Politics and Policy" in R. Falkner (ed.) The HandbooK of Global Climate and Environment Policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp 107-123 22. H. Selin. 2013. "Minervian Politics and International Chemicals Policy" in Y. TiBerghien (ed.) Leadership in Global Institution Building: Minerva’s Rule. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 193-212 21. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2012. "U.S. Climate Change Politics: Federalism and Complexity" in S. Kamieniecki and M. E. Kraft (eds.) Oxford HandbooK on U.S. Environmental Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 164-183 20. H. Selin. 2012. "GloBal Multilevel Governance and the Management of Hazardous Chemicals" in P. Dauvergne (ed.) HandbooK of Global Environmental Politics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 2nd edition, pp 210-221 19. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2012 "Federalism, Multilevel Governance, and Climate Change Politics across the Atlantic" in P. F. Steinberg and S. D. VanDeveer (eds.) Comparative Environmental Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp 341-368 Curriculum Vitae, March 2020, page 3 18. H. Selin and S. D. VanDeveer. 2011. "Institutional Linkages and European Air Pollution Politics" in R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re Redacted a U Th O R
    Coastal Urban Atmospheric Mercury Cycling and Emissions in Boston, MA by Emma Rutkowski Submitted to the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2019. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature redacted A u th o r........................................... ,...... Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science May 17, 2019 re redacted Certified by.. .Signatu Noelle Selin Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Accepted By......................................... Richard R Binzel MASSACHUSETTS INTITUTE OF TECHNQ9L.. Chair, Committee on Undergraduate Program JUN 1720191 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES Abstract This study aims to contribute to the body of knowledge regarding mercury emissions by reporting on a coastal, urban setting subject to inputs from both anthropogenic and oceanic reservoirs, in order to improve related policy decisions. Mercury can have se- rious health and ecological consequences, but the chemistry, transport and deposition of gaseous elemental mercury (Hg 0) are still not well understood. Estimates of anthro- pogenic emissions also remain uncertain. To better constrain urban- and regional-scale chemistry and emissions in a specifically coastal environment, concentrations of Hg0 were measured at an urban site in Boston, MA from Aug 2017 to Sept 2018. The recorded concentrations were compared against supplementary records of several additional pollu- tants and meteorological variables. Concentrations in Boston were found to be relatively low, but follow diurnal and seasonal trends previously observed in other sites in the United States driven by meteorology.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Co-Benefits of Renewable Energy Policy in the U.S. by Emil Dimantchev B.A. Mathematical Economics Colorado College (
    Air Quality Co-benefits of Renewable Energy Policy in the U.S. by Emil Dimantchev B.A. Mathematical Economics Colorado College (2011) Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2018 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018. All rights reserved. Author.………………………………………………………………………... Institute for Data, Systems, and Society August 10, 2018 Certified by.…………………………………………………………………... Noelle E. Selin Associate Professor, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Thesis Supervisor Accepted by.………………………………………………………………….. Munther Daleh Professor, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Director, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society 2 Air Quality Co-benefits of Renewable Energy Policy in the U.S. by Emil Dimantchev Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society on August 15, 2018 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy Abstract Despite lawmaker interest in transitioning electricity systems toward renewable energy sources and in mitigating harmful air pollution, the extent to which sub-national renewable energy policies in the U.S. can improve air quality and human health remains unclear. This thesis develops a systemic modeling framework to assess the impacts of future renewable energy policy on air quality, as well as on the economy and on climate change, employing the framework of cost-benefit analysis. To model the chain of policy effects from impacts on the economy to power plant emissions, human health, and climate change, I integrate an economy- wide computable general equilibrium model, an atmospheric chemistry model, and methodologies for the economic valuation of health impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Changes: Fall 2018
    GLOBAL CHANGES MIT JOINT PROGRAM ON THE SCIENCE & POLICY OF GLOBAL CHANGE FALL 2018 NEWSLETTER MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OUR RESEARCH MISSION At the Joint Program, our integrated team of natural and social scientists studies the interactions among human and Earth systems to provide a sound foundation of scientific knowledge. Such a foundation will aid decision‑makers in confronting the interwoven challenges of future food, energy, water, climate and air pollution issues, among others. Our mission is accomplished through: • Quantitative analyses of global changes and their social and environmental implications, achieved by employing and constantly improving an Integrated Global System Modeling (IGSM) framework; • Independent assessments of potential responses to global risks through mitigation and adaptation measures; • Outreach efforts to analysis groups, policymaking communities, and the public; and • Cultivating a new generation of researchers with the skills to tackle complex global challenges in the future. In This Issue: 1 PERSPECTIVES SAVE THE DATE: 3 JOINT PROGRAM NEWS XLII (42nd) GLOBAL CHANGE FORUM 3 Food, Water & Forestry March 27–29, 2019 • MIT Campus • Cambridge, MA 4 Air Quality & Health Theme: Global Change - Risks and Opportunities 5 Earth System Science 6 Climate Policy JOINT PROGRAM SPONSORS' MEETING 7 Regional Analysis March 27, 2019 • 2:00–5:00 pm EST 8 Energy 8 Modeling Tools Forum attendance is by invitation only. 9 PUBLICATIONS For additional information, please • Log into the sponsors’ section of our
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Co-Benefits, Sustainable Development
    Translating International Commitments to Domestic Action: Mercury Co-Benefits, Sustainable Development, and Climate Policy in China by Kathleen Mara Mulvaney B.S., Pennsylvania State University (2012) Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Technology Policy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2017 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2017. All rights reserved. Author.............................................................. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society May 12, 2017 Certified by. Noelle E. Selin Associate Prof. of Data, Systems, and Society and Atmospheric Chemistry Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Munther Dahleh W.A. Coolidge Prof. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Director, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Acting Director, Technology and Policy Program 2 Translating International Commitments to Domestic Action: Mercury Co-Benefits, Sustainable Development, and Climate Policy in China by Kathleen Mara Mulvaney Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society on May 12, 2017, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Technology Policy Abstract National commitments on the Paris Agreement on climate change interact with other global environment and sustainability objectives, such as the Minamata Convention on Mercury and the global Sustainable Development Goals. Understanding the inter- actions between climate change, air pollution, and sustainable development can help decision-makers identify more effective policies that can address environmental and economic goals simultaneously. To address environmental goals, I assess how mercury co-benefits (positive side effects that are peripheral to a policy’s main goal)ofana- tional climate policy in China could contribute to the country’s commitments under the Minamata Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Health Effects of Future Atmospheric Mercury Emissions
    Global Health Effects of Future Atmospheric Mercury Emissions Yanxu Zhang ( [email protected] ) Nanjing University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-3466 Zhengcheng Song Nanjing University Shaojian Huang Nanjing University Peng Zhang Nanjing University Yiming Peng Nanjing University Peipei Wu Nanjing University Jing Gu Nanjing University Stephanie Dutkiewicz Massachusetts Institute of Technology Huanxin Zhang Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Shiliang Wu Michigan Technological University Feiyue Wang University of Manitoba https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-0859 Long Chen East China Normal University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-7307 Shuxiao Wang School of Environment, Tsinghua University China https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-1963 Ping Li State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Science Article Page 1/26 Keywords: Mercury (HG), global health effects, atmospheric emissions Posted Date: January 12th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-136067/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 2/26 Abstract Mercury (Hg) is a potent neurotoxin that poses health risks to the global population. Anthropogenic Hg emissions to the atmosphere are projected to decrease in the future due to enhanced policy efforts such as the Minamata Convention, a legally-binding international treaty entered into force in 2017. To project the health benets of emission reduction requires considering both primary sources and recycling of previously deposited Hg from the land and ocean. Here we report the development of a comprehensive climate-atmosphere-land-ocean-ecosystem and exposure-risk model framework for Hg and its application to project the health effects of future atmospheric emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Proposed
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Proposed National Emissions Docket Nos. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0794, Standards for Hazardous Air EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234, Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0056, Electric Utility Steam Generating & Docket No. A–92–55 Units—Reconsideration of Supplemental Finding and Residual Via regulations.gov Risk and Technology Review, 84 Fed. April 17, 2019 Reg. 2670 (Feb. 7, 2019) COMMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND CIVIL RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS The undersigned organizations1 respectfully submit these comments in opposition to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal, 84 Fed. Reg. 2670 (Feb. 7, 2019) (“Proposal”), to find under section 112(n)(1) of the Clean Air Act that regulation of emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electric utility generating units (“EGUs”) is not “appropriate,” and to reverse its prior, contrary finding, Supplemental Finding that it is Appropriate and Necessary to Regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, 81 Fed. Reg. 24,420 (April 25, 2016) (“Supplemental Finding”).2 Undersigned organizations also oppose EPA’s unwarranted proposal to create a new sub-category that would allow certain waste-coal plants to emit greater quantities of acid gases. 1 Air Alliance Houston, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future, Clean Air Council, Clean Air Task Force, Clean Wisconsin, Conservation Law Foundation, Downwinders at Risk, Earthjustice, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Integrity Project, Environmental Law & Policy Center, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Sierra Club, Southern Environmental Law Center, The Ohio Environmental Council, and Waterkeeper Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATION, IMPROVEMENT, and APPLICATION of MODELS of ENVIRONMENTAL FATE and TRANSPORT of ATMOSPHERE- SURFACE EXCHANGEABLE POLLUTANTS (Aseps)
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2018 EVALUATION, IMPROVEMENT, AND APPLICATION OF MODELS OF ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT OF ATMOSPHERE- SURFACE EXCHANGEABLE POLLUTANTS (ASEPs) Tanvir Khan Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2018 Tanvir Khan Recommended Citation Khan, Tanvir, "EVALUATION, IMPROVEMENT, AND APPLICATION OF MODELS OF ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT OF ATMOSPHERE-SURFACE EXCHANGEABLE POLLUTANTS (ASEPs)", Open Access Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2018. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/593 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons EVALUATION, IMPROVEMENT, AND APPLICATION OF MODELS OF ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT OF ATMOSPHERE-SURFACE EXCHANGEABLE POLLUTANTS (ASEPs) By Tanvir R. Khan A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Environmental Engineering MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Tanvir R. Khan This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Environmental Engineering. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Judith Perlinger Committee Member: Dr. Hugh Gorman Committee Member: Dr. Daniel Obrist Committee Member: Dr. Noelle Selin Committee Member: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of Appeals and Dispute Resolution
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617 -292-5500 THE OFFICE OF APPEALS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION July 29, 2016 ________________________ In the Matter of OADR Docket Nos. 2011-025 & 026 Brockton Power Co., LLC File No. W207973 Brockton, MA ________________________ RECOMMENDED FINAL DECISION INTRODUCTION Environmental Justice is based on the noble principle “that no group of people, because of race, ethnicity, class, gender, or handicap [should] bea[r] an unfair share of environmental pollution from industrial, commercial, state and municipal operations or have limited access to natural resources, including greenspace (open space) and water resources.”1 In the Commonwealth, this principle has its foundation in the requirements of Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VI”) and a 2002 Environmental Justice Policy that the predecessor agency of the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (“EEA”) issued to state agencies under its jurisdiction (“2002 EJ Policy”), including the 1 Environmental Justice Policy of the Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, now Energy and Environmental Affairs, October 9, 2002, at p. 3. DEP on the World Wide Web: http://www.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (“MassDEP” or “the Department”).2 The Department is required to follow the requirements of Title VI and the 2002 EJ Policy
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Submitted to the SAB Staff Office
    By Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail Dr. Thomas Armitage Designated Federal Officer EPA Science Advisory Board (1400R) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Email: [email protected] Re: Science Advisory Board (SAB) Consideration of the Scientific and Technical Basis of EPA’s Proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Power Plants Residual Risk and Technology Review and Cost Review Dear Mr. Armitage: The undersigned organizations respectfully submit this written statement concerning the Science Advisory Board’s (SAB’s) review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Proposed Rule entitled National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units—Reconsideration of Supplemental Finding and Risk and Technology Review, 84 Fed. Reg. 2670 (Feb. 7, 2019) (Proposal). INTRODUCTION The SAB has issued a Draft Report on its review of the Proposal. Although dated October 16, 2019, the Draft Report did not become publicly available until December 31, 2019, and the SAB has stated that written statements should be submitted by January 10, 2020. The abbreviated public comment period does not allow sufficient time for adequate in-depth review and detailed discussion of all of the topics raised in the Draft Report. Accordingly, in this letter, we offer general comments but point the SAB to more-extensive and detailed discussions in some of the comments that our groups and commenters have provided in response to EPA’s Proposal. See Comments of Environmental, Public Health, and Civil Rights Organizations (dated April 17, 2019) (Appendix A). We also attach for reference the rulemaking comments filed by Attorneys General of Massachusetts and 20 other states, and other governmental entities, which are also cited below.1 The SAB plans to accept oral testimony on the proposed rule and the Draft Report, together with three other major rulemaking reviews, for one hour during a single abbreviated session on January 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Making on Hazardous Substances: the Minamata Convention and Mercury Abatement • Henrik Selin*
    Global Environmental Law and Treaty-Making on Hazardous Substances Henrik Selin Research Articles Global Environmental Law and Treaty- Making on Hazardous Substances: The Minamata Convention and Mercury Abatement • Henrik Selin* In global environmental cooperation, legally binding agreements have come under increased scrutiny. Critics are discouraged by a lack of progress, as many ecological trends remain negative despite the proliferation of treaties designed to reverse them.1 A number of high-proªle examples provide evidence of this. The slow evolution of international agreements on climate change mitigation and adaptation is much debated, as many scholars and activists have started to examine alternative ways to move forward.2 The international community also failed to meet the target of signiªcantly reducing rates of biodiversity loss by 2010 that was adopted by the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity and included in the Millennium Development Goals.3 However, progress in in- stitution building varies considerably across issue areas. Importantly, several treaties on hazardous substances and wastes central to safeguarding human health and the environment have been negotiated since the 1970s.4 The international environmental politics literature has long analyzed the creation of treaty regimes. Starting in the 1990s, as early environmental treaties matured, analytical focus shifted from negotiations to implementation and treaty effectiveness.5 There is nevertheless a need to examine treaty making, as states negotiate new agreements. The Minamata Convention on Mercury—a major addition to the institutionally fragmented treaty landscape on hazardous * I would like to thank three anonymous reviewers, as well as Kristin Sippl, Noelle Selin, and Aarti Gupta, for insightful comments on earlier versions of the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences
    Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences The Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences (EAPS) has broad intellectual horizons encompassing the solid Earth, its fluid envelopes, and its diverse neighbors throughout the solar system and beyond. The department seeks to understand fundamental physical, chemical, and biological processes that define the origin, evolution, and current state of these systems and to use this understanding to predict future states. The department comprises 41 faculty members (including two with a primary appointment in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, one with a primary appointment in the Engineering Systems Division, and another with a primary appointment in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics), and more than 240 research staff, postdoctoral associates, and visiting scholars. EAPS is notable for its emphasis on interdisciplinary problems and is involved in numerous laboratories, centers, and programs that address broad questions in the Earth sciences, including those that are among the most pressing societal issues of our time: change in climate and environment, natural resources and hazards, and the origin and evolution of life on Earth and, perhaps, elsewhere. For example, the Earth Resources Laboratory (under the directorship of professor Bradford Hager) draws on faculty, staff, and students across disciplinary, department, and school boundaries to investigate geophysical and geological problems in energy and resource development. The Center for Global Change Science (under the directorship of professor Ronald Prinn) builds on the programs in meteorology, oceanography, hydrology, chemistry, satellite remote sensing, and policy. The Lorenz Center (under the directorship of professors Kerry Emanuel and Daniel Rothman) fosters creative approaches to learning how climate works.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17, 2019 Administrator Andrew Wheeler US Environmental
    April 17, 2019 Administrator Andrew Wheeler US Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0794 Subject: Comments on “National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units—Reconsideration of Supplemental Finding and Residual Risk and Technology Review” As academic researchers studying mercury fate, transport, and impacts, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Reconsideration of Supplemental Finding and Residual Risk Technology Review. We write to encourage the Environmental Protection Agency to withdraw its Proposed Finding and Residual Risk Review, given limitations in its assessment methodologies and developments in scientific research on mercury processes and impacts since 2011. This assessment is based on our own research (Giang and Selin 2016; Perlinger et al. 2018; attached; Angot et al. 2018), as well as our review of relevant scientific literature. In the below, we focus on mercury as one important component of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs). Our comments are in response to solicitations for comments C-2 and C-24. (C-2) The Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) from 2011 quantifies a very limited range of mercury- related benefits of regulation. Recent evidence indicates that benefits that were unquantified in the RIA may be substantial, and larger than the subset that were monetized. In Giang and Selin (2016), we estimated the benefits of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) policy for
    [Show full text]