Geology Background Booklet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pilot Rock - Soda Mountain 6089 Ft Elev
Pilot Rock Cascade-Siskiyou BLM BLM archives Rising 570 ft to an elevation of 5910 ft., Pilot Rock is perhaps the most striking feature of Cascade- Siskyou National Monument. Visible from much of the Shasta Valley in northern California and parts of Oregon’s Rogue Valley, the Rock serves as a friendly beacon to some five million vehicles and their passengers that travel the I-5 corridor annually. Competing Theories Pilot Rock is part of the Cascade Range, a mountain Put simply, a “plug” is an intrusive body formed by mag- range notable for its string of volcanic peaks stretching ma which cooled underground and was later exposed by from British Columbia to northern California’s Lassen erosion. Peak. The Monument’s proclamation refers to Pilot Rock as “a volcanic plug,” describing it as “a remnant of a Recent Research feeder vent left after a volcano eroded away, leaving an Recent research regarding Pilot Rock suggests that 25 outstanding example of the inside of a volcano.” Pilot million years ago, magma oozed through a weak spot Rock is composed mostly of volcanic andesite and has in the earth’s crust, but did not reach the surface. As a sheer, vertical faces with classic columnar jointing created result, some geologists refer to Pilot Rock as technically by the cooling of its andesite composition. a “volcanic plug,” but NOT as defined in the Monument’s proclamation. (The proclamation evidently uses “plug” Plug or a Neck or both? and “neck” interchangeably.) However “plugs”and Many geologists use the terms “neck” and “plug” in- “necks” are defined, what they both have in common is terchangeably, while others believe the terms apply to erosion. -
Ashland Ranger District Rogue River National Forest APPENDICES
'L-JCUMENU A 13.66/2: B 42x/APP./c.4 I V 0) C) oa)4e EN D\ Ashland Ranger District Rogue River National Forest APPENDICES APPENDIX A: KEY ISSUES & KEY QUESTIONS APPENDIX B: FIRE Identification of Specific Vegetation Zones for the Bear Watershed Analysis Area Fire Behavior Fuel Model Key Fuel Model Assignments Chronology of Events APPENDIX C: GEOLOGY, GEOMORPHOLOGY & SOILS Geology and Geomorphology of the Bear Watershed Analysis Area Characteristics of Soil Productivity APPENDIX D: HYDROLOGY What Sort of Debris is Transported Stream Classification Bibliography of Water Quality Studies Map: Drainageways Crossed Map: Dominant Precipitation Patterns APPENDIX E: FISHERIES Historic and Current Miles of Fish Habitat River Mile Index APPENDIX F: AQUATIC AND RIPARIAN HABITAT Habitat Comparison Chart Relative Comparison of Stream Gradients With Coarse Woody Debris Historic and Current Conditions for Aquatic Processes and Functions Maps: Reach Breaks of Neil Creek, West Fork & East Forks of Ashland Creek Table: Processes & Human Influences on Aquatic and Riparian Ecosystems Map: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Surveyed Wetlands Map: Supplemental Water Distribution System Broad Level Delineation of Major Stream Types (Rosgen) Delineative Criteria for Major Stream Types (Rosgen) APPENDIX G: HERITAGE RESOURCES Cultural Uses in the Bear Watershed Analysis Area Chronology of Important Dates APPENDIX A I KEY ISSUES & KEY QUESTIONS Key Questions IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: These questions drive the analysis for Chapter II: Historic and Current Conditions and Future Trends. CLIMATE Identification of the atmospheric/climate regimes under which the ecosystem of the Bear Watershed Analysis Area have developed is important to this analysis. Attributes to be discussed in this analysis include periods of flood and drought, storm patterns in the winter and summer, occurrence of severe lightning and wind storms, rain on snow events, etc. -
Metasomatized Lithospheric Mantle for Mesozoic Giant
https://doi.org/10.1130/G46662.1 Manuscript received 19 June 2019 Revised manuscript received 18 October 2019 Manuscript accepted 21 October 2019 © 2019 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. Published online 22 November 2019 Metasomatized lithospheric mantle for Mesozoic giant gold deposits in the North China craton Zaicong Wang1*, Huai Cheng1, Keqing Zong1, Xianlei Geng1, Yongsheng Liu1, Jinhui Yang2, Fuyuan Wu2, Harry Becker3, Stephen Foley4 and Christina Yan Wang5 1 State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources (GPMR), School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China 2 Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China 3 Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 12249, Germany 4 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia 5 Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China ABSTRACT to designate as crustal metamorphism-related The origin of giant lode gold deposits of Mesozoic age in the North China craton (NCC) is orogenic Au deposits because they formed prior enigmatic because high-grade metamorphic ancient crust would be highly depleted in gold. to 1.8 Ga after high-grade metamorphism of the Instead, lithospheric mantle beneath the crust is the likely source of the gold, which may have crust, which would have been strongly deplet- been anomalously enriched by metasomatic processes. However, the role of gold enrichment ed in gold and fluids (Goldfarb and Santosh, and metasomatism in the lithospheric mantle remains unclear. Here, we present comprehensive 2014; Goldfarb and Groves, 2015). -