Signature Redacted Department of Mechanical & Ocean Engineaing May 12, 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Signature Redacted Department of Mechanical & Ocean Engineaing May 12, 2014 Missiles & Misconceptions: Why We Know More About the Dark Side of the Moon than the Depths ARCNWVE, of the Ocean OF TECHNOLoGY byhe O c a JUL 3 0 20 14 - by Grace Calvert Young LIBRARIES Submitted to the Department of Mechanical & Ocean Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical & Ocean Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2014 @ Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014. All rights reserved. Author..................Signature redacted Department of Mechanical & Ocean Engineaing May 12, 2014 / Certified by... Sig.nature redacted........... Pierre Lermusiaux Associate Professor Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Accepted by........................................ Anette Hosoi Professor of Mechanical Engineering Missiles & Misconceptions: Why We Know More About the Dark Side of the Moon than the Depths of the Ocean by Grace Calvert Young Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on on May 16, 2014 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science in Mechanical & Ocean Engineering ABSTRACT Tens of billions of dollars are spent on manned and unmanned missions prob- ing deeper into space, while 95% of Earth's oceans remain unexplored. The more intensive focus on space exploration is a historically recent phenomenon. For millennia until the mid-20th century, space and ocean exploration pro- ceeded roughly at the same pace, driven by military and commercial inter- ests as well as simple curiosity. Both date back to early civilization when star-gazers scanned the skies, and sailors and free-divers scoured the seas. Since the 1960s, however, the trajectories of exploration diverged dramati- cally. Cold War-inspired geopolitical-military imperatives propelled govern- ment funding of space research to an extraordinary level, while ocean ex- ploration stagnated in comparison. Moreover, although the Cold War ended more than 20 years ago, the disparity in research efforts remains vast de- spite evidence that accelerating changes in our marine ecosystems directly threatens our wellbeing. This thesis reviews the history of space and ocean exploration through the Cold War to the present. It also dispels persistent misconceptions that led to the disparity in resources allocated between space and ocean exploration and argues for prioritizing ocean research. Thesis Supervisor: Pierre Lermusiaux, Associate Professor of Mechanical & Ocean Engineering 2 We shall not cease from exploration And the end of our exploring Will be to return where we started And know the place for the first time. - T.S. Eliot 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Pre-Cold War History of Space and Ocean Exploration 6 2.1 Early Star Gazers ............................ .. 6 2.2 Sea Explorers ....... ........ ... .... .... ... .. 10 3 Cold War & Beyond 15 3.1 Pre-NASA ........ ................................ 16 3.2 Pre-NOAA ........ ................................ 19 3.3 Founding of NASA & Subsequent Space Research ... ........ 29 3.4 Founding of NOAA & Subsequent Ocean Research .......... 33 4 Misconceptions 34 4.1 Space as a Military Imperative. ... ............ ...... 34 4.2 Ocean's Impact on Human Life ........ ............ 35 4.3 Extent of Oceanographic Knowledge ........ ......... 39 5 Conclusion: Will There Be a Sputnik for the Ocean? 42 6 Acknowledgements 44 Appendices 48 A Space Versus Sea Exploration Timeline 49 B US Government Expenditure on Space Activities, 1959 - 2008 54 C US Government Expenditure on Ocean Activities, 2014 55 3 1 Introduction We know less of the oceans at our feet, where we came from, than we do of the sky above our heads. - President John F. Kennedy, 1963 We know more about the dark side of the moon than the depths of the ocean. This is startling, considering how much more tangible the ocean is than space, and more importantly, how much more critical it is to the health and survival of humanity. Tens of billions of dollars are spent on manned and unmanned missions probing deeper into space, while 95% of Earth's oceans remain unexplored.1 The result is a perilous dearth in knowledge about our planet at a time when rapid changes in our marine ecosystems profoundly affect its habitability. The more intensive focus on space exploration is a historically recent phenomenon. For millennia until the mid-20th century, space and ocean exploration proceeded roughly at the same pace, driven by curiosity, military, and commerce. Both date back to early civilization when star-gazers scanned the skies, and sailors and free-divers scoured the seas. Since the 1960s when Don Walsh and Jacques Piccard descended to the deepest point on the ocean floor, and Neil Armstrong ascended to the moon, however, the trajectories of exploration diverged dramatically. Cold War-inspired geopolitical-military imperatives propelled space research to an extraordinary level, while ocean exploration stagnated in comparison. Moreover, although the Cold War ended more than 20 years ago, the disparity in effort remains vast despite evidence that accelerating changes in our marine ecosystems directly threatens our wellbeing.* Misconception about the relative importance of space and ocean exploration caused, and continues to sustain, this knowledge disparity to our peril. In the following section, we review the history of space and ocean exploration *See the 2014 United Nations Climate Change Report. Alan B. Sielen also gives an overview of the ocean's poor health and it's repercussions in "See Change" (Foreign Affairs. 16 Apr. 2014. Web. 29 Apr. 2014). 4 before the Cold War, when the pace of exploration in each sector was more or less comparable for thousands of years. We show in section 3, however, how the relative paces and trajectories of exploration diverged dramatically during the Cold War and continue to the present. In section 4 we seek to dispel the persistent misconceptions that have led to the disparity in resources allocated between space and ocean explo- ration, and argue for prioritizing ocean research. Finally, in section 5 we highlight the urgent imperative for expanding our understanding of the ocean. 5 2 Pre-Cold War History of Space and Ocean Ex- ploration Science unfolded her treasures and her secrets to the desperate demands of men, and placed in their hands agencies and apparatus almost decisive in their character. - Winston Churchill, reflecting on WWI Space and ocean exploration proceeded at similar paces until the 1950s, when the Cold War commenced. The first star-gazers created maps of the heavens based on carefully observed patterns. During the Renaissance, they built telescopes and rockets to probe even deeper into space. Early sea explorers took to the seas for food, transportation, and military conquest. As early as Alexander the Great's era, they used technology to dive deeper and longer. Understanding of the sky and sea were tied, especially in ancient Egypt, because the stars informed navigators at sea and could predict tides and the agricultural seasons. 2.1 Early Star Gazers The earliest space explorers were star-gazers, driven by curiosity, spirituality, and the need for an agricultural calendar. The world's oldest observatory, known as the Goseck circle located in modern Germany, dates back to 4900 BC.2 Openings on the structure aligned with the sunrise and sunset of the winter and summer solstices, and it likely served as a place for celestial worship and as a calendar.3 Ancient Egyptians also observed the sky to predict floods and schedule plantings.4 The Nebra sky disk, dating from 1600 BC, contains the oldest known depiction of an astronomical phenomena and was found not far from the Goseck circle.5 Likewise, the ancient Mesopotamians, as well as the Inca, Maya and Aztecs, were famously sophisticated star gazers. 6 (a) (b) Figure 1: (a) Victor Hess (center) returning from his 1912 balloon flight, during which he discovered cosmic rays. (Credit: American Physical Society) (b) Launch of German V-2 in 1943; the developers of the rocket gave their knowledge to the US at the close of WWII as part of Operation Paperclip, which helped to launch the Cold War-era Space Age. (Credit: German Federal Archives) In the 2nd century BC, the Greek astronomer Eratosthenes furthered a mathemat- ical understanding of heavenly bodies when he measured the earth's circumference based on the sun's relationship to the earth. Scientific understanding of the solar system spiked during the Renaissance. In the 16th century, Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus provided a full mathematical de- scription of the heliocentric system, later corroborated by the Italian physicist Galileo Galilei. Meanwhile, Galileo improved the telescope for astronomical observations, and used the device to discover moons of Jupiter and the craters on earth's moon, among other celestial phenomenon. In late 17th and early 18th century England, Sir Isaac Newton and Edmond Halley, among others, developed scientists' understand- ing of planetary orbits and arrangements, and improved telescope optics pioneered by Galileo to facilitate the discovery of new heavenly bodies. We gained most of our knowledge of space during the 20th century, however, with the aid of technological advances in photography, telescopes, imaging across the electromagnetic spectrum, and rocketry. In 1912, the Austrian-American physicist 7 Victor Hess rode a balloon up to 5.3 km and collected data that proved the existence of cosmic rays. In 1924, using the world's largest telescope, American astronomer Edwin
Recommended publications
  • 1957 – the Year the Space Age Began Conditions in 1957
    1957 – The Year the Space Age Began Roger L. Easton, retired Naval Research Laboratory Linda Hall Library Kansas City MO 6 September 2007 Conditions in 1957 z Much different from now, slower, more optimistic in some ways z Simpler, yet very frightening, time 1 1957 in Politics z January 20: Second Presidential Inauguration of Dwight Eisenhower 1957 in Toys z First “Frisbee” from Wham-O 2 1957 in Sports z Third Year of Major League Baseball in Kansas City z the “Athletics,” not the “Royals” 1957 in Sports z No pro football in Kansas City z AFL was three years in future z no Chiefs until 1963 3 1957 at Home z No microwave ovens z (TV dinners since 1954) z Few color television sets z (first broadcasts late in 1953) z No postal Zip Codes z Circular phone diales z No cell phones z (heck, no Area Codes, no direct long-distance dialing!) z No Internet, no personal computers z Music recorded on vinyl discs, not compact or computer disks 1957 in Transportation z Gas cost 27¢ per gallon z September 4: Introduction of the Edsel by Ford Motor Company z cancelled in 1959 after loss of $250M 4 1957 in Transportation z October 28: rollout of first production Boeing 707 1957 in Science z International Geophysical Year (IGY) z (actually, “year and a half”) 5 IGY Accomplishments z South Polar Stations established z Operation Deep Freeze z Discovery of mid-ocean submarine ridges z evidence of plate tectonics z USSR and USA pledged to launch artificial satellites (“man-made moons”) z discovery of Van Allen radiation belts 1957: “First” Year of Space Age z Space Age arguably began in 1955 z President Eisenhower announced that USA would launch small unmanned earth-orbiting satellite as part of IGY z Project Vanguard 6 Our Story: z The battle to determine who would launch the first artificial satellite: z Werner von Braun of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to the the Future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt
    SpaceFlight A British Interplanetary Society publication Volume 62 No.7 July 2020 £5.25 SPACE PLANES: back to the the future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt 634089 The man behind the ISS 770038 Remembering Dr Fred Singer 9 CONTENTS Features 16 Multiple stations pledge We look at a critical assessment of the way science is conducted at the International Space Station and finds it wanting. 18 The man behind the ISS 16 The Editor reflects on the life of recently Letter from the Editor deceased Jim Beggs, the NASA Administrator for whom the building of the ISS was his We are particularly pleased this supreme achievement. month to have two features which cover the spectrum of 22 Why don’t we just wing it? astronautical activities. Nick Spall Nick Spall FBIS examines the balance between gives us his critical assessment of winged lifting vehicles and semi-ballistic both winged and blunt-body re-entry vehicles for human space capsules, arguing that the former have been flight and Alan Stern reports on his grossly overlooked. research at the very edge of the 26 Parallels with Apollo 18 connected solar system – the Kuiper Belt. David Baker looks beyond the initial return to the We think of the internet and Moon by astronauts and examines the plan for a how it helps us communicate and sustained presence on the lunar surface. stay in touch, especially in these times of difficulty. But the fact that 28 Probing further in the Kuiper Belt in less than a lifetime we have Alan Stern provides another update on the gone from a tiny bleeping ball in pioneering work of New Horizons.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Annual Report
    2012-13 Annual Accountability Report FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM of FLORIDA Board of Governors Annual Accountability Report FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY 2012-2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DASHBOARD p. 2 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS p. 5 NARRATIVE p. 6 DATA TABLES SECTION 1. FINANCIAL RESOURCES p. 16 SECTION 2. PERSONNEL p. 20 SECTION 3. ENROLLMENT p. 21 SECTION 4. UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION p. 23 SECTION 5. GRADUATE EDUCATION p. 32 SECTION 6. RESEARCH & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT p. 35 1 Annual Accountability Report FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY 2012-2013 Dashboard Headcount Fall % 2007-2012 Degree Programs Offered 2012 Carnegie Classifications Enrollments 2012 Total % Change TOTAL 50,394 100% 31% TOTAL (as of Spring 2013) 178 Research Universities Basic: White 6,259 12% -5% Baccalaureate 63 (high research activity) Hispanic 31,037 62% 36% Master’s 81 Undergraduate Professions plus arts & Black 6,639 13% 37% Research& Specialist’s Doctorate 30 Instructional Program: sciences, high graduate Doctorate Other 6,459 13% 50% Professional Doctorate 4 Graduate Comprehensive doctoral Full-Time 30,094 60% 31% Faculty Full- Part- Instructional Program: (no medical/veterinary) Part-Time 20,300 40% 30% (Fall 2012) Time Time Large four-year, primarily Size and Setting: Undergraduate 36,217 72% 22% TOTAL 1,116 34 nonresidential Graduate 8,414 17% 35% Tenure & Ten. Track 687 6 Community Curricular Engagement and T. Track Unclassified 5,763 11% 114% Non-Tenured Faculty 429 28 Engagement: Outreach and Partnerships DEGREE PRODUCTIVITY
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Meteorology in the Cold War Era: Scientific Coalitions and International Leadership 1946-1964
    SATELLITE METEOROLOGY IN THE COLD WAR ERA: SCIENTIFIC COALITIONS AND INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP 1946-1964 A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Angelina Long Callahan In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in History and Sociology of Technology and Science Georgia Institute of Technology December 2013 Copyright © Angelina Long Callahan 2013 SATELLITE METEOROLOGY IN THE COLD WAR ERA: SCIENTIFIC COALITIONS AND INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP 1946-1964 Approved by: Dr. John Krige, Advisor Dr. Leo Slater School of History, Technology & History Office Society Code 1001.15 Georgia Institute of Technology Naval Research Laboratory Dr. James Fleming Dr. Steven Usselman School of History, Technology & School of History, Technology & Society Society Colby College Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Kenneth Knoespel Date Approved: School of History, Technology & 6 November 2013 Society Georgia Institute of Technology ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I submit this dissertation mindful that I’ve much left to do and much left to learn. Thus, lacking more elegant phrasing, I dedicate this to anyone who has set aside their own work to educate me. All of you listed below are extremely talented and because of that, managing substantial workloads. In spite of that, you have each been generous with your insight over the years and I am grateful for every meeting, email, and gesture of support you have shown. First, I want to thank my dissertation committee. I am extremely proud to claim each of you as a mentor. Please know how grateful I am for your patience and constructive criticism with this work in progress as it evolved milestone by milestone.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarius Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet: 2019 Designer: Perry Submarine Builders (Florida) Construction: Victoria Machine Works (Texas); start: 1986 | complete: 1987 Estimated construction cost: $5.5M Operational Timeline: St. Croix Deployment: Deployment in Salt River Canyon, St. Croix: 1987 Owner: NOAA Operator: Farleigh Dickenson University Interim Period: Recovered: 1990 by the University of North Carolina Wilmington Refurbished: 1990-1993 at North Carolina State Ports, Wilmington, NC Owner: NOAA Operator: University of North Carolina Wilmington Florida Keys Deployment: Initial deployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1993 (baseplate deployed 1992) Recovered for refurbishment: 1996-1998 - Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Ft. Pierce, FL Redeployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1998 – present Owner: NOAA: 1986-2014; Florida International University: 2014 – present Operator: FDU: 1987-1989; UNCW: 1990-2012; Florida International University: 2013 - present Aquarius Siting: Conch Reef, Florida Keys (Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary): Distance From Islamorada shore base: 15.4 km (8.5 nm) Distance offshore: 9 km (5.4 nm) Hatch depth/storage depth: 14 m (46 fsw) 35 psi Depth of bottom directly below Aquarius: 18 m (60 fsw) (updated: 09.15.19) Habitat Specifications: Aquarius weight: 82-ton double-lock pressure vessel Baseplate weight: 120 tons Dimensions: 14-meters long by 3-meters in diameter (46 ft x 10 ft) Crew: 4 scientists and 2 technicians Amenities: kitchen facilities that include a microwave, instant hot water dispenser, refrigerator, sink, dining
    [Show full text]
  • Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 6-2013 The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress Andrew Follett College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Follett, Andrew, "The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 584. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/584 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Andrew Follett Accepted for . John Gilmour, Director . Sophia Hart . Rowan Lockwood Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2013 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Part 1: Introduction and Background 4 Pre Soviet Collapse: Early American Failures in Space 13 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Successful Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Programs 17 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Quasi-Successful Shuttle Program 22 Part 2: The Thin Years, Repeated Failure in NASA in the Post-Soviet Era 27 The Failure of the Space Exploration Initiative 28 The Failed Vision for Space Exploration 30 The Success of Unmanned Space Flight 32 Part 3: Why NASA Fails 37 Part 4: Putting this to the Test 87 Part 5: Changing the Method.
    [Show full text]
  • Fantasy Or Fiction , Volumesociety
    or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The Oceanography Society. Send all correspondence to: [email protected] ofor Th e The to: [email protected] Oceanography approval Oceanography correspondence all portionthe Send Society. ofwith any permitted articleonly photocopy by Society, is of machine, reposting, this means or collective or other redistirbution article has This been published in SPECIAL IssUE FEATURE Oceanography Fantasy or Fiction journal of The 21, NumberOceanography 3, a quarterly Society. , Volume Waking Up to the Public’s Lack of Understanding BY ELLEN PRAGER C opyright 2008 by The 2008 by opyright Oceanography Society. A ll rights reserved. P ermission is granted to copy this article for use in teaching and research. article use for research. and this copy in teaching to granted is ermission ONCE UPon A TIME, in a land ignorance, and even worse, indifference, all but a few, including the educator faraway, there was a society in which about the environment and, specifically, in the bunch, explained or agreed that P people understood and were excited the ocean. They were a diverse group of global warming is due to sun shining O Box 1931, about science, especially ocean science. individuals in terms of ethnicity, afflu- through the ozone hole. “Nooooooo!” R I first dreamed of this place a few years ence, and education; they were brought That’s me knocking my head on the wall ockville, R epublication, systemmatic reproduction, reproduction, systemmatic epublication, ago as I sat behind a wall of one-way together by an ocean-related industry to behind the glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Empire
    4 Alexander’s Empire MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES EMPIRE BUILDING Alexander the Alexander’s empire extended • Philip II •Alexander Great conquered Persia and Egypt across an area that today consists •Macedonia the Great and extended his empire to the of many nations and diverse • Darius III Indus River in northwest India. cultures. SETTING THE STAGE The Peloponnesian War severely weakened several Greek city-states. This caused a rapid decline in their military and economic power. In the nearby kingdom of Macedonia, King Philip II took note. Philip dreamed of taking control of Greece and then moving against Persia to seize its vast wealth. Philip also hoped to avenge the Persian invasion of Greece in 480 B.C. TAKING NOTES Philip Builds Macedonian Power Outlining Use an outline to organize main ideas The kingdom of Macedonia, located just north of Greece, about the growth of had rough terrain and a cold climate. The Macedonians were Alexander's empire. a hardy people who lived in mountain villages rather than city-states. Most Macedonian nobles thought of themselves Alexander's Empire as Greeks. The Greeks, however, looked down on the I. Philip Builds Macedonian Power Macedonians as uncivilized foreigners who had no great A. philosophers, sculptors, or writers. The Macedonians did have one very B. important resource—their shrewd and fearless kings. II. Alexander Conquers Persia Philip’s Army In 359 B.C., Philip II became king of Macedonia. Though only 23 years old, he quickly proved to be a brilliant general and a ruthless politician. Philip transformed the rugged peasants under his command into a well-trained professional army.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarius Reef Base • Study Guide
    Aquarius Reef Base • Study Guide In this exciting sneak preview of season 4, Jonathan visits Aquarius Reef Base—the world’s only undersea lab where scientists live in saturation for days or weeks at a time, studying the ocean. It’s an amazing combination of science fiction and undersea adventure! Objectives Discussion for after watching the program 1. Introduces viewers to issues regarding gas uptake and decompression in diving. 1. What two factors limit scuba divers in how long they can stay underwater before 2. Demonstrates how research can be surfacing? accomplished “in saturation.” 2. How does Aquarius Reef Base change the need for divers to limit their dive time? Questions for before watching the program 3. What are some technical difficulties that were overcome to allow divers to live in 1. If you hold a glass upside-down and then aquarius? submerge it, does water fill the glass? Why or why not? 4. What are some ways in which the higher ambient pressure inside Aquarius affects 2. What would happen if you then took that people? glass down to 33 feet of seawater? (Internet research: what is the significance of 33 feet 5. Even though we can’t metabolize of seawater?) nitrogen, why does it play a role in diving physiology? 3. If you took an empty glass down to 33 feet of seawater, flipped it upside down and filled 6. What is meant by the term “saturation it with air, what is the pressure of the air diving?” inside? 7. Why doesn’t water come inside Aquarius 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographyof Space Books Andarticlesfrom Non
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19800016707N 2020-03-11T18:02:45+00:00Zi_sB--rM-._lO&-{/£ 3 1176 00167 6031 HHR-51 NASA-TM-81068 ]9800016707 BibliographyOf Space Books And ArticlesFrom Non-AerospaceJournals 1957-1977 _'C>_.Ft_iEFERENC_ I0_,'-i p,,.,,gvi ,:,.2, , t ,£}J L,_:,._._ •..... , , .2 ,IFER History Office ...;_.o.v,. ._,.,- NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546 1979 i HHR-51 BIBLIOGRAPHYOF SPACEBOOKS AND ARTICLES FROM NON-AEROSPACE JOURNALS 1957-1977 John J. Looney History Office NASA Headquarters Washlngton 9 DC 20546 . 1979 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 033-000-0078t-1 Kc6o<2_o00 CONTENTS Introduction.................................................... v I. Space Activity A. General ..................................................... i B. Peaceful Uses ............................................... 9 C. Military Uses ............................................... Ii 2. Spaceflight: Earliest Times to Creation of NASA ................ 19 3. Organlzation_ Admlnlstration 9 and Management of NASA ............ 30 4. Aeronautics..................................................... 36 5. BoostersandRockets............................................ 38 6. Technology of Spaceflight....................................... 45 7. Manned Spaceflight.............................................. 77 8. Space Science A. Disciplines Other than Space Medicine ....................... 96 B. Space Medicine ..............................................119 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Sharks on Coral Reef Ecosystems } Do Healthy Reefs Need
    Impacts of sharks on coral reef ecosystems } Do healthy reefs need sharks? This is one of the most misunderstood questions in coral reef ecology. Shark populations are declining due to habitat loss, overfishing, and other stressors. It is important to understand how these losses could affect the rest of the ecosystem. Understanding the predator-prey interactions between herbivores and sharks is crucial for coral reef conservation. As top predators, sharks not only eat other fish, but they can also affect their behavior. In the presence of sharks, herbivorous fish may be concentrating their grazing to small, sheltered areas. Because these fish have to eat where they are safe from predators, there is more space to allow young coral to settle, grow, and thrive. In the absence of sharks, herbivorous fish may spread out their grazing randomly across large patches of algae, leaving few well-defined or cleared areas for corals to settle. Fortunately, Florida International University has just the place to explore these dynamic questions, a lab under the sea – Aquarius Reef Base. From September 7th to 14th, a mission at Aquarius Reef Base will combine sonar with baited remote underwater video surveys (BRUVs), an experiment the first of its kind to bring these technologies together. Researchers on this mission strive to understand the direct impact of shark presence on herbivorous fish behavior as well as the indirect impact of sharks on algae communities. Combining these technologies: • Provides a new way to study reef fish behavior • Carves the path forward for future ecological research • Offers insights that may lead to critical marine conservation outcomes Mission Overview: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt: Facts for Kids
    Egypt: Facts for Kids Learn some interesting information about China. Read about the Great Wall of China, its major cities, population, languages, rivers, animals, economy and much more. Egypt is officially known as the Arab Republic of Egypt. In 2012, the population of Egypt was just over 83 million. Egypt is bordered by the Gaza Strip, Israel, Libya and Sudan as well as the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea. The Sinai Peninsula in Egypt spans across two continents, Africa and Asia. Mount Catherine is the highest mountain in Egypt, standing 8625 feet. The official language of Egypt is Arabic, but others languages such as English and French are also understood by many. The capital city is Cairo, which also has the largest population. Other major cities include Alexandria and Giza. Egypt is a very dry country. The Sahara and Libyan Desert make up most of the area of Egypt. Egypt experiences natural hazards such as droughts, earthquakes, flash floods, landslides, windstorms (called khamsin), dust storms and sandstorms. The longest river in the world, the Nile, runs through Egypt. Egypt is famous for its ancient civilization, the Ancient Egyptians, who date back to around 3150 B.C. Egypt is home the Great Pyramid of Giza, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. The most popular sport in Egypt is football (soccer). Ancient Egypt was one of the greatest and most powerful civilizations in the history of the world. It lasted for over 3000 years from 3150 BC to 30 BC. The Nile River The civilization of Ancient Egypt was located along the Nile River in northeast Africa.
    [Show full text]