DOCSLIB.ORG

Challenging Youth Racism: Project Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Challenging Youth Racism: Project Report Challenging Youth Racism: Project Report 1 Challenging Youth Racism: Project report 2019 Contents Contents Executive Summary 4 Part One 6 Introduction 6 Background of Project 6 Prior education interventions 8 Types of Delivery 11 Community Events and Engagement 13 Part Two - Key findings 14 Methodology 14 Typology of young people 15 Quantitative Findings 17 Experiences of racism 22 What is racism 24 Use of language- Black 27 Use of language - Asian 30 Use of language - Dual Heritage 32 Use of language - White 33 Islamophobia 35 Immigration 40 Prejudice and stereotyping 43 Roma Gypsy Travellers 44 Judaism 47 Buddhism, Sikhism, Hinduism, Christianity 49 Far right 51 History of racism 54 Culture 55 Challenging Racism 57 Social Influences 62 Media Influences 65 Part Three - Discussion of Key Themes 68 Part Four - Summary and Conclusion 78 Summary 78 Conclusion 87 Bibliography 89 Appendices 92 Appendix 1 – Workshop Questionnaire 92 Appendix 2 – Pre-Workshop Questionnaire 94 Appendix 3 – Peer Mentoring Questionnaire: Before 95 Appendix 4 – Peer Mentoring Questionnaire: After 98 Appendix 5 - Full Range of Participants’ Reported Ethnicities 102 Appendix 6 – Full Day Carousel Questionnaire: Before 103 Appendix 7 – Full Day Carousel Questionnaire: After 104 Appendix 8 – Racism Awareness Programme Module List 105 2 Meet the ‘Challenging Youth Racism’ team: From left to right: David Temple, Kelly McClay, Sara Bloomfield and Alex Carter David Temple Kelly McClay Sara Bloomfield Alex Carter Research Associate Senior Practitioner Project Worker Research Assistant Teesside University Humankind Humankind Teesside University Authors: Dr David Temple, Teesside University Professor Nigel Copsey, Teesside University Dr Alex Carter, Teesside University 3 Challenging Youth Racism: Project report 2019 Executive Summary ‘Challenging Youth Racism’ (CYR) is a Big Lottery funded project delivered by HumanKind (two project workers) in partnership with Teesside University (two researchers). The project was developed in response to concerns around high levels of prejudice and discrimination and disproportionate levels of racially and religiously motivated hate crime within North East England, an area with a large White British population. CYR has delivered anti- racism interventions to over 7,500 young people (aged 11-19) across the region since July 2016. The bulk of our interventions are our awareness raising workshops and our Racism Awareness Project (RAP) which are run in a variety of educational and community-based settings. The report will highlight the effectiveness of CYR interventions delivered to young people against its stated objectives, to: increase acceptance of others, increase awareness on the impact of racism, and to encourage young people to challenge/report racism. The CYR project has been particularly effective in meeting its objectives, as can be seen in some key figures based on young people’s responses… Workshops > 85% of young people maintained or increased their acceptance of people of a different religion, nationality and/or skin colour. > 91% of young people maintained or increased their understanding of how racist behaviour impacts people > 83% of young people maintained or increased their willingness to challenge or report people responsible for racist behaviour 4 Racism Awareness Programme (RAP) > 73% of young people maintained or increased their willingness to challenge or report people responsible for racist behaviour Workshops and RAP > 81% of young people from 14 different ‘BAME’ groups displayed increased confidence to engage in shared cultural activities and enjoy public spaces. The aim of this report is to provide additional context to these figures. It will do so by highlighting some key qualitative findings. Some notable findings include… > Experiences of young BAME populations highlight the extent to which they or people they know (friends, family) have been racially abused. They have been targeted across the region, both in schools and in the community in various places, on the street, in town centres, in schools. > The lack of adequate responses has a wider impact in terms of willingness of young people to report racism to official sources, such as the police and schools. This is also likely to contribute to the continuing issue of underreporting. This is an aspect in which our Racism Awareness Programme (RAP) has become vital to encourage young people to report. > Young people have displayed a range of views related to racism, ranging from hostility, to ambivalence, to acceptance and willingness to challenge. > Young people may not have heard of the term ‘Islamophobia’, but are aware of its significance once understood. Indeed anti-Muslim sentiment was prevalent in young people’s discussions around, and conceptions of, racism. This was also often linked to strongly held anti-Muslim sentiment normalised within families and communities surrounding young people. > Young people often displayed a thinly veiled dislike around immigration. Often young people make automatic associations that an immigrant is something bad. For example, a belief that they are illegal and shouldn’t be here. Or that immigrants are taking something from them, such as jobs, housing, and benefits. > The majority of young people are unaware of the ‘far right’. Once understood, most displayed an apathy or dislike towards such groups. A minority of young people displayed support for far-right groups and figures. > This highlights the necessity of anti-racism interventions that address these associations directly, and provide a ‘safe space’ for fears and anxieties to be discussed. These can be unpicked successfully through counter- narratives that focus on knowledge and emotive based responses. These are particularly effective when views are based on ignorance rather than hostility. > CYR interventions have provided: valuable counter-narratives to ‘hostile’ and ‘critical’ groups; helped ‘mixture’ groups to recognise the seriousness of racism; and helped ‘acceptable bystanders’ become ‘challenging upstanders’. The timing of the project has been particularly crucial. A number of high profile events have taken place which have compounded and enhanced such feelings and beliefs. This has included: ‘Brexit’, the terror attacks in London and Manchester in 2017. Indeed, there has been a significant increase in hate crimes in the region since the project began. In the same period, the North East has had a disproportionately high number of far-right mobilisations. These have each clearly influenced the views and beliefs of young people to be presented within this report. These themes feature heavily throughout this report which will identify young people’s knowledge and thought on various themes related to racism. This will highlight the variety and range of thoughts, experiences and attitudes related to racism amongst young people. 5 Challenging Youth Racism: Project report 2019 Part One Introduction ‘Challenging Youth Racism’ is a National Lottery Community fund project delivered by Humankind (formerly DISC) in partnership with Teesside University. Throughout, there have been two full-time project workers (Humankind), and one full-time researcher (Teesside University). A part-time researcher has also been employed on the project since August 2018 (Teesside University). The Challenging Youth Racism (CYR) team provide anti-racism interventions to young people (aged 11-19) across North East England. Our main remit is to: increase acceptance of others, increase awareness on the impact of racism, and to encourage young people to challenge/report racism. We do this predominantly through awareness raising workshops, and our Racism Awareness Programme (RAP). In our one-day RAP session we train young people to: educate others, report racism, challenge racist behaviour and to provide support for those affected by racism. We have delivered over 350 workshops to over 7,000 young people and have trained over 150 RAP ambassadors since the project began in July 2016. The success of the project has also been recognised when it was nominated for the North East Equality Awards in 2017 and 2018. The aim of this report is to provide an account of the work of the project so far. This will detail work of the project from July 2016-April 2019. Though it should be noted that the project is ongoing and interventions will continue through until June 2019, the initial end-date of the project. The report will initially outline the work of the project, which will include: the range of interventions delivered to young people, the ethos underpinning this work, where these interventions have been delivered and who to, the range of partners that have helped to support and influence the project, and the methods used to evaluate the project (Part One). With these points in place, the reports main focus is to shine a spotlight on young people’s knowledge, views and experiences of racism and topics related to racism. As noted, the project has been delivered to a large number of young people in the region, and we are keen to highlight not only their perspectives (based on a range of sources including comments during sessions, answers during activities and from questionnaires), but importantly what works and what doesn’t with regards to ‘challenging youth racism’ (Part Two). This will include a further discussion of key themes to provide additional context to these findings, and to explain why certain approaches are or are not successful (Part Three). The key findings are then summarised
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weaponized Humor: the Cultural Politics Of
    WEAPONIZED HUMOR: THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF TURKISH-GERMAN ETHNO-COMEDY by TIM HÖLLERING B.A. Georg-August Universität Göttingen, 2008 M.Ed., Georg-August Universität Göttingen, 2010 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Germanic Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) June 2016 © Tim Höllering, 2016 Abstract My thesis aims to show how the humor of Turkish-German ethno-comedians fulfills a double purpose of entertaining its audience while advancing a cultural political agenda that Kathrin Bower called “transnational humanism.” It includes notions of human rights consensus, critical self-reflection, respect, tolerance, and openness to cultural diversity. Promoting these values through comedy, the artists hope to contribute to abating prejudice and discrimination in Germany’s multi-ethnic society. Fusing the traditional theatrical principle of “prodesse et delectare” with contemporary cultural politics, these comedians produce something of political relevance: making their audience aware of its conceptions of “self” and “other” and fostering a sense of community across diverse cultural identifications. My thesis builds mainly on the works of Kathrin Bower, Maha El Hissy, Erol Boran, Deniz Göktürk, and Christie Davies. Whereas Davies denies humor’s potential for cultural impact, Göktürk elucidates its destabilizing power in immigrant films. Boran elaborates this function for Turkish-German Kabarett. El Hissy connects Kabarett, film, and theater of polycultural artists and ties them to Bakhtin’s concept of the carnivalesque and the medieval jester. Bower published several essays on the works of ethno-comedians as humorous catalysts for advancing a multiethnic Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-05-25 Prohibited Words List
    Clouthub Prohibited Word List Our prohibited words include derogatory racial terms and graphic sexual terms. Rev. 05/25/2020 Words Code 2g1c 1 4r5e 1 1 Not Allowed a2m 1 a54 1 a55 1 acrotomophilia 1 anal 1 analprobe 1 anilingus 1 ass-fucker 1 ass-hat 1 ass-jabber 1 ass-pirate 1 assbag 1 assbandit 1 assbang 1 assbanged 1 assbanger 1 assbangs 1 assbite 1 asscock 1 asscracker 1 assface 1 assfaces 1 assfuck 1 assfucker 1 assfukka 1 assgoblin 1 asshat 1 asshead 1 asshopper 1 assjacker 1 asslick 1 asslicker 1 assmaster 1 assmonkey 1 assmucus 1 assmunch 1 assmuncher 1 assnigger 1 asspirate 1 assshit 1 asssucker 1 asswad 1 asswipe 1 asswipes 1 autoerotic 1 axwound 1 b17ch 1 b1tch 1 babeland 1 1 Clouthub Prohibited Word List Our prohibited words include derogatory racial terms and graphic sexual terms. Rev. 05/25/2020 ballbag 1 ballsack 1 bampot 1 bangbros 1 bawdy 1 bbw 1 bdsm 1 beaner 1 beaners 1 beardedclam 1 bellend 1 beotch 1 bescumber 1 birdlock 1 blowjob 1 blowjobs 1 blumpkin 1 boiolas 1 bollock 1 bollocks 1 bollok 1 bollox 1 boner 1 boners 1 boong 1 booobs 1 boooobs 1 booooobs 1 booooooobs 1 brotherfucker 1 buceta 1 bugger 1 bukkake 1 bulldyke 1 bumblefuck 1 buncombe 1 butt-pirate 1 buttfuck 1 buttfucka 1 buttfucker 1 butthole 1 buttmuch 1 buttmunch 1 buttplug 1 c-0-c-k 1 c-o-c-k 1 c-u-n-t 1 c.0.c.k 1 c.o.c.k.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Hateful Extremism
    Challenging Hateful Extremism October 2019 Our Vision for Challenging Hateful Extremism Our vision is one where together we uphold our democratic way of life in a peaceful, plural and inclusive society that opposes intolerance; where people exercise individual liberty and take personal responsibility for promoting equal citizenship, recognising the harm extremist behaviours cause to everyone; and where our communities and institutions robustly challenge and resist hateful extremism and support those affected by it. Commission for Countering Extremism Foreword Hateful extremism demands a response. reviewed the Strategy and its delivery it is my From inspiring terrorist attacks, to hateful view that the current response is insufficient extremist groups engaging in persistent and too broad. hostility, we are grappling with what is a global challenge. If we are to be successful in reducing the extremist threat in our country, we must However, extremism, and how we counter it, focus on challenging hateful extremism. is a complex and contested policy area. The My report shows the destructive effect debate is often polarised and abusive; not hateful extremism is having on the lives helped by the overuse of the E-word. This of individuals, our communities and is particularly evident in these politically wider society. febrile times. Counter extremism policy over the years This climate makes serious discussions has also been characterised by a top-down about extremism challenging. And yet it is approach. The voices of the wider public, vital that we have those discussions. victims and counter extremism practitioners have been missing. That is why I have I have worked in the field of counter invested in extensive engagement, meeting extremism for over ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Bess Lomax Hawes Student Folklore Collection
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c85d8v11 No online items Guide to the Bess Lomax Hawes Student Folklore Collection Special Collections & Archives University Library California State University, Northridge 18111 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91330-8326 URL: https://library.csun.edu/SCA Contact: https://library.csun.edu/SCA/Contact © Copyright 2020 Special Collections & Archives. All rights reserved. Guide to the Bess Lomax Hawes URB.BLH 1 Student Folklore Collection Contributing Institution: Special Collections & Archives Title: Bess Lomax Hawes Student Folklore Collection Creator: Hawes, Bess Lomax, 1921-2009 Identifier/Call Number: URB.BLH Extent: 10.50 linear feet Date (inclusive): 1959-1975 Abstract: Bess Lomax Hawes is the daughter of famed folklorist John A. Lomax. Ms. Hawes had an active musical career as a singer, instrumentalist and songwriter. Her career as an educator began in 1954 when she became an instructor in guitar, banjo and folk music in the extension division at the University of California, Los Angeles. In 1963, she joined the Anthropology Department at San Fernando Valley State College. The material contained in this collection consists of folkloric data collected between 1958 and 1977 by students enrolled in Anthropology 309: American Folk Music, Anthropology 311: Introduction to Folklore, and various senior seminars at San Fernando Valley State College (now California State University, Northridge). Language of Material: English Biographical Information: Bess Lomax Hawes was born in Austin, Texas in 1921 to Bess Bauman-Brown Lomax and John A. Lomax, famed folklorist and author of Cowboy Songs, American Ballads and Folksongs, Adventures of a Ballad Hunter, and director of the Archive of American Folksong at the Library of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Discriminatory Language Research Presented to the BBFC on 15Th November 2010
    Discriminatory Language Research Presented to the BBFC on 15th November 2010 Slesenger Research Research objectives To understand the role of context and how it changes attitudes to discriminatory language / issues To establish the degree to which the public expect to be warned about potentially offensive language/behaviour/stereotyping in CA, ECI/ECA To understand spontaneous reactions to a number of discriminatory terms To explore what mitigates the impact of these words and how To understand the public’s response to the Video Recordings Act and their appreciation of the ‘E’ classification 2 Slesenger Research Recruitment Criteria Group Discussions 2 hours 7/8 respondents All had personally watched a film either at the cinema or at home (DVD rental/purchase) at least once in the last two to three months Spread of occasional and more regular film viewers Even spread of parents of different ages of children and boys/girls All respondents were pre - placed with three relevant film/TV works All respondents completed a short questionnaire/diary about the material they had viewed Paired Depths 1-1 1/2 hours As for group discussions 3 Slesenger Research Sample and Methodology 9 x Group discussions 18-25 Single, working/students, BC1 Race Female Edgware 18-25 Single, working/students, C2D Sexuality Male Leeds 25-40 Children under 8 years Female Leeds Working, part-time and non, C2D Sexuality 25-40 Children under 8 years Male Scotland Working, BC1 Sexuality 25-40 Children 8-12 years Female Birmingham Working, part-time and non,
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Protest and Heterogeneous Diffusion
    BRITAIN FIRST AND THE UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY: SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOVEMENT-PARTY DYNAMICS1 Thomas Davidson and Mabel Berezin2 FORTHCOMING IN DECEMBER 2018 ISSUE OF MOBILIZATION. PLEASE CITE THE PUBLISHED VERSION. Social movement scholars have recently turned their attention to the interactions between political parties and social movements, but little is known about how social media have impacted these relationships, despite widespread adoption of these technologies. We present a case study of the relationship between Britain First, a far-right anti-Muslim social movement, and the U.K. Independence Party, the Eurosceptic political party that spearheaded the Brexit campaign. The movement appeared marginal in the press but it dominated social media, using this presence to support to the party. We examine the dynamics of the relationship between these groups from 2013 until 2017, drawing upon data from social media, newspapers, and other online sources, and focusing on interactions between elites and rank-and-file supporters. Our findings illustrate how far-right groups have used new technologies to generate an unprecedented amount of popular support and to attempt to influence the political mainstream. A number of western democracies have recently experienced a resurgence of right-wing political activity in both the parliamentary and extra-parliamentary sphere (Akkerman, de Lange, and Rooduijn 2016; Mudde 2016; Muis and Immerzeel 2017). In Germany, the unprecedented electoral performance of the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying Around Racism, Religion and Culture Bullying Around Racism, Religion and Culture
    Bullying around racism, religion and culture Bullying around racism, religion and culture PHOTO REDACTED DUE TO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS OR OTHER LEGAL ISSUES You can download this publication or order copies online at www.teachernet.gov.uk/publications Search using the ref: 0000-2006DOC-XX Copies of this publication can also be obtained from: DfES Publications PO Box 5050 Sherwood Park Annesley Nottingham NG15 0DJ Tel: 0845 60 222 60 Fax: 0845 60 333 60 Textphone: 0845 60 555 60 email: [email protected] Please quote ref: DfES-0000-2006DOC-XX ISBN: 0-00000-000-0 XXXXX/D00/0000/00 Crown Copyright 2006 Produced by the Department for Education and Skills Contents 1 INTRODUCING 4 1.1 Foreword by the Minister for Schools 6 1.2 Statutory requirements and expectations 7 1.3 Stories and messages from young people 9 1.4 Five key principles 26 1.5 Terms and definitions 28 1.6 The extent of racist bullying 37 1.7 Forms of prejudice and intolerance 39 1.8 Messages of support 41 1.9 Acknowledgements 43 2 RESPONDING 45 2.1 Frequently asked questions 47 2.2 Racist bullying and other forms of bullying 51 2.3 Supporting those at the receiving end 53 2.4 Challenging those who are responsible 55 2.5 Case studies 58 BULLYING AROUND RACISM, RELIGION AND CULTURE 1 3 PREVENTING 61 3.1 Starting points for school self-evaluation 63 3.2 Key concepts across the curriculum 67 3.3 Classroom activities 70 3.4 Case studies 79 3.5 Teaching about controversial issues 85 4 TRAINING 91 4.1 Discussing scenarios 93 4.2 Notes on scenarios 95 4.3 Sorting views and voices 98 4.4
    [Show full text]
  • On the Power of Slurring Words and Derogatory Gestures
    Charged Expressions: On the Power of Slurring Words and Derogatory Gestures Ralph DiFranco, Ph.D. University of Connecticut, 2016 Slurs have the striking power to promulgate prejudice. Standard semantic and pragmatic theories fail to explain how this works. Drawing on embodied cognition research, I show that metaphorical slurs, descriptive slurs, and slurs that imitate their targets are effective means of transmitting prejudice because they are vehicles for prompting hearers to form mental images that depict targets in unflattering ways or to simulate experiential states such as negative feelings for targets. However, slurs are a heterogeneous group, and there may be no one mechanism by which slurs harm their targets. Some perpetrate a visceral kind of harm – they shock and offend hearers – while others sully hearers with objectionable imagery. Thus, a pluralistic account is needed. Although recent philosophical work on pejoratives has focused exclusively on words, derogation is a broader phenomenon that often constitutively involves various forms of non- verbal communication. This dissertation leads the way into uncharted territory by offering an account of the rhetorical power of iconic derogatory gestures and other non-verbal pejoratives that derogate by virtue of some iconic resemblance to their targets. Like many slurs, iconic derogatory gestures are designed to sully recipients with objectionable imagery. I also address ethical issues concerning the use of pejoratives. For instance, I show that the use of slurs for a powerful majority
    [Show full text]
  • The School Report: Race, Education and Inequality in Contemporary Britain
    Runnymede Perspectives The Runnymede School Report Race, Education and Inequality in Contemporary Britain Edited by Claire Alexander, Debbie Weekes-Bernard and Jason Arday Disclaimer Runnymede: This publication is part of the Runnymede Perspectives Intelligence for a series, the aim of which is to foment free and exploratory thinking on race, ethnicity and equality. The facts presented Multi-ethnic Britain and views expressed in this publication are, however, those of the individual authors and not necessariliy those of the Runnymede Trust. Runnymede is the UK’s leading independent thinktank ISBN: 978-1-909546-10-3 on race equality and race Published by Runnymede in August 2015, this document is relations. Through high- copyright © Runnymede 2015. Some rights reserved. quality research and thought leadership, we: Open access. Some rights reserved. The Runnymede Trust wants to encourage the circulation of its work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. • Identify barriers to race The trust has an open access policy which enables anyone equality and good race to access its content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any relations; format, including translation, without written permission. • Provide evidence to This is subject to the terms of the Creative Commons support action for social Licence Deed: Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales. Its main conditions are: change; • Influence policy at all • You are free to copy, distribute, display and perform levels. the work; • You must give the original author credit; • You may not use this work for commercial purposes; • You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Producers Handbook
    PRODUCERS HANDBOOK November 2020 ITV PRODUCER’S HANDBOOK ITV’s Editorial and ComplianCe PoliCies and ProCedures Page 4 Introduction 4 Viewer Trust in ITV 5 Taking Part in Programmes 11 Protecting Programme Participants 15 Children in Programmes 25 Live Programmes 32 Interactivity 36 Covert Filming/Recording 38 Commercial ReFerences, Sponsorship and Product Placement 39 OFFensive Language 45 Internet Material 48 Charity Related Content 49 Compliance, Commissioning & Referral Up 50 OfCom BroadCast Code and GuidanCe 51 Section 1 - Protecting the Under-Eighteens Section 2 - Harm and OFFence Section 3 – Crime, Disorder, Hatred and Abuse Section 4 - Religion Section 5 - Due Impartiality and Due Accuracy, and Undue Prominence oF Views and Opinions Section 6 - Elections and ReFerendums Section 7 - Fairness Section 8 - Privacy Section 9 - Commercial ReFerences in Programmes OfCom On Demand ServiCe Rules 66 Media Law 69 Introduction 69 DeFamation 70 Privacy 73 Contempt 75 Copyright and Fair Dealing 77 Data Protection 83 ConFidentiality 90 2 Industry Codes and GuidanCe OFcom Broadcasting Code (including the Cross-Promotion Code): https://www.oFcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast- codes/broadcast-code OFcom Broadcasting Code Guidance: https://www.oFcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/inFormation-for- industry/guidance/programme-guidance Phone-paid Services Authority: https://psauthority.org.uk/For-business/code-guidance-and-compliance 3 ITV’S EDITORIAL AND COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IntroduCtion Welcome to the ITV Producer’s Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Roll List
    Master Roll List QRS O-6 1925 1 Cavalleria Rusticana 1890 Operatic Selecti Mascagni, Pietro 2 Sextette from "Lucia di Lammermoor" 1835 Aria Donizetti, Gaetano 3 Little Grey Home in the West 1903 Song Lohr, Hermann 4 Alma 0 Vals unknown 5 Qui Vive! 1862 Grand Galop de Ganz, Wilhelm 6 Grande Polka de Concert 1867 Polka Bartlett, Homer N. 7 Are You Sorry? 1925 Fox Trot Ager, Milton 8 What Do You Say, Boys? (Whadaya Say?) 1925 Fox Trot Voll, Cal de 9 Somewhere with You 1924 Fox Trot Magine, Frank 10 Save Your Sorrow (for Tomorrow) 1925 Fox Trot Sherman, Al QRS O-21 1925 Roen 1 Barney Google 1923 Fox Trot Conrad, Con 2 Swingin' down the Lane 1923 Fox Trot Jones, Isham 3 Just Lonesome 1925 Waltz Magine, Frank 4 O Solo Mio 1898 Canzonetta Capua, Eduardo di 5 That Red Head Gal 1923 Fox Trot Van, Gus 6 Paddlin' Madeline Home 1925 One-Step Woods, Harry QRS O-78 1915 Lbl 1 When It's Moonlight on the Mississippi 1915 One-Step Lange, Arthur 2 Circus Day in Dixie 1915 One-Step Gumble, Albert 3 What Would You Do for Fifty Thousand Dollars? 0 One-Step Paley, Herman 4 I Love to Tango with My Tea 1915 One-Step Alstyne, Egbert van 5 Go Right Along, Mister Wilson 1915 One-Step Brown, A. Seymour 6 Classic Rag 1909 Rag Moret, Neil 7 Norway (The Land of the Midnight Sun) 1915 One-Step, Trot Fisher, Fred 8 At the Old Plantation Ball 1915 Fox Trot Donaldson, Walter 9 Come back Dixie 1915 March Song Wenrich, Percy 10 At the Garbage Gentlemen's Ball 1914 One-Step Daly, Joseph M.
    [Show full text]
  • Final CERD Report Justifi.Qxd
    Dimensions of Discrimination in India A shadow report to 15th to 19th periodic reports (CERD/C/IND/19) of India to UN CERD Committee National Network for Human Rights Treaty Monitoring in India National Network for Human Rights Treaty Monitoring in India a Dimensions of Discrimination in India A shadow report to 15th to 19th periodic reports (CERD/C/IND/19) of India to UN CERD Committee National Network for Human Rights Treaty Monitoring in India Dimensions of Discrimination in India A shadow report to 15th to 19th periodic reports (CERD/C/IND/19) of India to UN CERD Committee © National Network for Human Rights Treaty Monitoring in India, 19 February 2007 All rights reserved. National Network for Human Rights Treaty Monitoring in India Secretariat: Asian Centre for Human Rights C-3/441-C, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058, India Phone/fax: +91-11-25620583, 25503624 E-Mail: [email protected] Contents INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . .1 PART 1: GENERAL: DIMENSIONS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN INDIA . .5 RESPONSES TO CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE . .5 ELEMENTARY EDUCATION AS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT (PARAS 20 TO 22) . .7 BROAD STRATEGIES (PARAS 23 TO 27): . .7 a. Children hardest to reach groups . .7 b. Child soldiers . .8 c. Affirmative actions . .8 LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT (PARAS 28 TO 34) . .8 RIGHT TO WORK (PARAS 35 TO 42) . .9 PART 2: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARTICLES 2 TO 7 OF ICERD . .9 ARTICLE 2: PARAS 44 TO 52 . .9 ARTICLE 4: PARAS 57 TO 63 . .9 ARTICLE 5: PARAS 64 TO 135 . .9 Article 5 (a): Right to equal treatment before the tribunals (paras 67-68) .
    [Show full text]