Origins of the Bilderberg Meetings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
| | | | | Bilderberg | Reports | Origins | Bernhard | Anti -Jewish? 2008 | 2007 | '06 | '05 | '04 | '03 | '02 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | '98 | '97 | '96 | '95 | '94 | '93 | '92 | '91 Bilderberg Conferences Origins of the Bilderberg meetings [This site campaigns for a press conference at all Bilderberg venues - and a declaration from the steering committee that any consensus reached must be in our public, not their private interest] Creator and chairman of the Bilderbergers was a card carrying member of Hitler's SS and repeatedly lied when asked if he was a Nazi party member as a student (separate page all about Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands) This photograph was taken at the first Bilderberg meeting at Prince Bernhard's Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeek, Holland in 1954. Hugh Gaitskell is in the far corner of the room looking rather sceptical and you can just see him scratching his chin. Another more limited photo of the same room which includes chairman Prince Bernhard is here Novus Ordo Seclorum: Pax Americana MUST READ: The Bilderberg Group and the project of European unification - by Prof. Mike Peters in 'Lobster' 32 04Apr12 - Inaugural Bilderberg meeting held in SS HexenKessel or 'Witches Cauldron', site of 1st Airborne slaughter March 2012 - Audio clips from the 1954 first Bilderberg meeting 18Mar12 - Operation Market Garden's curious Bilderberg connections Rare book about Hitler's No. 2 whose death was faked in 1972: Martin Bormann, Nazi In Exile by Paul Manning (1981) The Nuts And Bolts Of Nazi Continuity: Extract from the above which focusses on the crucial Red House Meeting which took place on Thursday 10th August 1944 at the Maison Rouge in Strasbourg Official attendee list PDF from the first ever Bilderberg meeting in Prince Bernhard's Bilderberg Hotel, Oosterbeek, Holland, May 1954 "Imagine yourselves to be dictators of Europe" extract from a paper on the EU single market programme The Round Table - Extracted from The Anglo -American Establishment, from Rhodes to Cliveden, by Carrol Quigley An Uncommon View of the Birth of an Uncommon Market - Alfred Mendez 1939 -1945 - The Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies Group - roundtable 'Memoirs of an Eminence Grise' - by John Pomian - 1972 - extract from biography of Joseph Retinger Sat21Dec1968 - Daily Telegraph - Sikorski pilot denies role in death plot Eisenhower ’s special assistant for psychological warfare....... 'The Global Manipulators' by Robert Eringer - Chapter 1 'In Search of Answers' 'Uniting the West' - by ex British chancellor Denis Healey - from his autobiography 'The Time of My Life' 'The Hôtel de Bilderberg' from 'H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands; an authorized biography' - Alden Hatch 'Bosnia, Bohemia & Bilderberg: The Cold War Internationale' - Alfred Mendes - from 'Common Sense' issue 16 - 1994 'Prince Bernhardt's Secret Society' by A.K. Chesterton Historical Links Trident research page now gone - recovered here NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM: PAX AMERICANA http://www.angelfire.com/wv2/blueridgeprint/ THE ANGLO-AMERICAN BLUEPRINT FOR A NEW WORLD ORDER, A WORLD FEDERAL UNION CALLED - the UNITED STATES OF MAN (originally entitled UNION NOW WITH BRITAIN) - by Clarence K. Streit, 1941, author also of UNION NOW This work, at the outset of Hitler’s rise, led to the establishment of the United Nations and its relevance to post-9/11 geo-political foreign policy by the governments of the United States and Great Britain is evident--the precise formula being executed by Bush and Blair governments! UNION NOW WITH BRITAIN was Streit’s second edition and expanded version of UNION NOW, which was widely distributed and read during WWII in America and England, what George Orwell called “this much-discussed book”. Now more obscure, this publisher, upon discovery, saw immediately the relevance of this book to post-9/11 events and thought it needed new distribution to warn of this master blueprint for Novus Ordo Seclorum—a new world order. The relevance of UNION NOW WITH BRITAIN can be readily observed by the Bush -Blair response and Anglo-American governments coalition to launch a global “War on Terrorism” to ”reorder the world” after September 11, 2001 under the guise of establishing “democracy”, “peace”, and “freedom” in the world. NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM: PAX AMERICANA (Union Now with Britain) Read this historical treatise and see how the events of 9/11 have accelerated this blueprint for an American-led new world order! "Out of these troubled times [Iraq/Kuwait conflict], our fifth objective -- a new world order can emerge: a new era...We're now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders." September 11, 1990 - Iraq Speech by President George H. W. Bush "Our mission is clear: to rid the world of evil" - Pres. George W. Bush, post-Sept. 11, 2001 "Out of the shadow of this evil [9/11], should emerge lasting good... This is a moment to seize...let us re-order this world around us." - British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Oct. 2, 2001 (BBC) http://www.angelfire.com/wv2/blueridgeprint/ The Bilderberg Group & the project of European unification Nato=Nazi - link four - click here for next From Lobster 32 http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk This article copyright Lobster Magazine and Sociology Prof. Mike Peters Lobster is a six-monthly magazine/journal devoted to parapolitics, uncovering hidden forces that govern the way we live. Typical articles include: 'The CIA, drugs and the media', Jane Affleck's web survey, 'the Rockefeller UFO initiative'. It is an independently published by the editor and needs all the support it can get. The following article has been used with permission, if you like what you read do please consider taking out Lobster's modest subscription. The annual cost is between six and nine pounds stirling depending on where you live. Postal address and email at the bottom of the article. You can subscribe to Lobster here: http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk Download this paper as an .rtf text document here The Bilderberg Group and the project of European unification Prof. Mike Peters Introduction Despite their reputation for 'empiricism', British academics have tended to treat political power by means of abstract concepts rather than empirical information about the actions of determinate individuals and groups (e.g. Giddens, 1984, 1985; Scott, 1986). After a brief efflorescence of empirical studies of the so-called 'Establishment' in the early 1960s, sociologists in Britain became diverted from empirical investigation of power, as the study of national and international power-structures became conducted under the aegis of increasingly abstract theoretical categories derived from Marxism, and in particular by a wave of concepts based on Poulantzas's 'structuralist' critique of Miliband, and was followed by ever more esoteric discussions of the 'theory' of the state (e.g. Jessop, 1990), culminating in the hegemony of a post-Marxist version of Gramsci's conception of 'hegemony' - in which 'struggle' is posited without any identifiable human beings as its active protagonists, and with the stakes reduced to ideas rather than concrete interests. This was in sharp contrast with the USA, where the impetus of C. Wright Mills's pioneering study of the network of interests involved in the Cold War (Mills, 1956) was continued by a flourishing group of scholars. There has been nothing in Britain of comparable scope or detail to the work conducted in the USA by G. W. Domhoff, Thomas Dye, Mark Mizruchi or Noam Chomsky, etc. The present article is concerned with one specific facet of American power-structure research which, I believe, has important implications for the study of power in the UK. This is the subject of power-elite networks and forums, conceptualised as arenas for the conduct of intra-capitalist and inter-corporate strategic debates and long-range social planning, from which wider 'democratic' interference is carefully excluded. The particular institution about which I will present information is the so-called 'Bilderberg Group', which is an interesting example of this kind of power-elite forum. It is one among a number of little-publicised institutions which have played an important role providing a means for debates and discussions to take place amongst different capitalist groups and different national governments over long-term planning issues and, especially, in Co-ordinating strategic policy at an international level. Other such bodies on this trans-national scale include the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the USA, with its UK sister organisation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (otherwise known simply as Chatham House) and the Trilateral Commission (which itself grew out of Bilderberg meetings and has been essentially a more globalist version of the latter, since it incorporates Japanese representatives). Each of these bodies will be mentioned in what follows. One of the 'functions' such institutions appear to serve is that of 'mediating' between the economic interests of private capital and the requirement of a general interest on the part of the capitalist class as a whole. I shall suggest that much of the theorising about the 'state' in the tradition of structural Marxism since the 1970s has confused this relation between capital and national governments, owing to the tendency to reify the abstraction called ‘the state' and posit it as enjoying a virtual autonomy vis-à-vis capital; whereas the empirical evidence lends more support to the rather hastily dismissed (and often grotesquely caricatured) model called 'instrumentalism’. To anticipate what will be said later, I believe that one of the key assumptions often made by structural Marxists, namely that the capitalist class is always divided into competing fractions which have no mechanisms for co-ordination other than the state, is not empirically sustainable. Part of this misconception, it could be said, derives from an over-literal understanding of the concept of the 'market' as constituting the only social relation amongst different fractions of capital.