DOCSLIB.ORG

European Red List of Birds 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Red List of Birds 2015 Calidris alpina (Dunlin) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 5 Sources of reported national population data p. 8 Species factsheet bibliography p. 13 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Calidris alpina (Dunlin) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Belarus 0 <1 2003-2012 medium - 100 2001-2004 good - 100 1980-2004 medium C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Denmark 135 <1 2011 good - 20-33 2000-2011 good - 50-100 1980-2011 good C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa DK: Faroe Is 10-15 <1 2014 medium ? ? C. a. schinzii, Iceland & Greenland/NW and West Africa DK: Greenland 7,000-15,000 2 2000-2012 medium ? ? C. a. arctica, NE Greenland/West Africa Estonia 180-230 <1 2008-2012 good - 20-50 2001-2012 good - 50-70 1980-2012 good C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Finland 5,000-10,000 1 2006-2010 medium ? - 40-50 1980-2012 medium C. a. alpina, NE Europe & NW Siberia/W Europe & NW Africa Finland 55-60 <1 2010-2012 good 0 0 2001-2012 good - 42 1980-2012 medium C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Germany 7-16 <1 2005-2009 good - 64-87 1998-2008 good - 51-100 1985-2009 medium C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Iceland 270,000 56 2000 poor ? ? C. a. schinzii, Iceland & Greenland/NW and West Africa Rep. Ireland 150 <1 2008 medium - 27 1996-2008 poor - 58-79 1972-2008 poor C. a. schinzii, Britain & Ireland/SW Europe & NW Africa Latvia 0-1 <1 2012 medium ? - 90-100 1980-2012 good C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Lithuania 5-10 <1 2008-2012 medium - 60-80 2001-2012 medium - 60-80 1980-2012 medium C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Norway 25,000-35,000 6 2013 poor ? ? C. a. alpina, NE Europe & NW Siberia/W Europe & NW Africa NO: Svalbard 200-300 <1 2001-2013 poor ? ? C. a. alpina, NE Europe & NW Siberia/W Europe & NW Africa Poland 0-1 <1 2008-2012 good - 95-100 2000-2012 good - 100 1980-2012 medium C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Russia 100,000-200,000 29 1995-2010 poor - 5-30 2001-2012 poor - 5-30 1980-2012 poor C. a. alpina, NE Europe & NW Siberia/W Europe & NW Africa Russia 10-25 <1 2001-2012 good - 60-90 2000-2011 good - 70-95 1980-2012 medium C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa Sweden 10,000-20,000 3 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 medium + 10-30 1980-2012 medium C. a. alpina, NE Europe & NW Siberia/W Europe & NW Africa Sweden 80-120 <1 2008-2012 good - 35-65 2001-2012 good - 50-80 1980-2012 good C. a. schinzii, Baltic/SW Europe & NW Africa United Kingdom 8,600-10,600 2 2005-2007 good + 56 1998-2010 medium 0 0 1982-2006 medium C. a. schinzii, Britain & Ireland/SW Europe & NW Africa EU27 24,200-41,300 6 Stable Europe 426,000-562,000 100 Unknown THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Calidris alpina (Dunlin) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Calidris alpina (Dunlin) Table 2. Reported national wintering population sizes and trends in Europe1. Note that some countries within the species' wintering range did not report any data, and that only minimum totals are presented, to avoid double-counting of birds moving between countries. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (individuals)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 750-3,800 <1 2002-2012 good - 5-10 2002-2012 good - 20-30 1980-2012 poor Azerbaijan 4,000-10,000 <1 1996-2002 medium ? ? Belgium 1,774-2,252 <1 2008-2012 good - 6-7 2001-2012 good - 1-3 1992-2012 good Bulgaria 140-820 <1 2008-2012 medium + 37 2000-2012 good ? Croatia 100-250 <1 2010 good - 40-50 1998-2010 good ? DK: Faroe Is 0-10 <1 1992 medium ? ? France 253,300-361,000 24 2008-2012 good - 11-12 2000-2012 good + 29-30 1980-2012 good Georgia Present <1 2012 ? ? Germany 120,000 9 2000-2005 good F 0 1997-2009 good F 0 1987-2009 good Rep. Ireland 44,380 3 2006-2011 good - 40 1999-2011 good - 43 1987-2011 medium Italy 64,925-79,211 6 2007-2009 good + 5-15 2000-2009 good + 40-75 1991-2009 good Montenegro 5,000-8,000 <1 2003-2012 good F 0 2003-2012 good F 0 1991-2012 good Netherlands 158,216-300,789 17 2006-2010 good 0 0 2000-2011 good + 12-112 1981-2011 good Portugal 30,004 2 2008-2012 good 0 0 2001-2012 good - 1988-2012 medium Slovenia 0-14 <1 2008-2012 good ? F 0-1000 1980-2012 medium Spain 94,217-104,728 8 2008-2010 good + 10 2000-2010 good + 2-7 1980-2009 good Turkey 4,000-12,000 1 2012 medium ? ? Ukraine 10-800 <1 1996-2009 medium F 10-70 1996-2009 medium F 10-80 1980-2009 medium United Kingdom 360,000 28 2004-2008 good - 14 1999-2010 good - 27 1980-2010 good EU27 1,130,000-1,400,000 98 Decreasing Europe 1,140,000-1,440,000 100 Decreasing 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Trend maps A symbol appears in each country where the species occurs: the shape and colour of the symbol represent the population trend in that country, and the size of the symbol corresponds to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sticta Arctica Degel.] Arctic Moon Habitat/Range: Over Mosses and Mossy Rocks in Alpine Localities; N Am – Eastern Eurasia, N to AK, S to OR
    STICTA/UMBILICARIA [Sticta arctica Degel.] Arctic moon Habitat/Range: Over mosses and mossy rocks in alpine localities; N Am – eastern Eurasia, N to AK, S to OR. Reaction: All spot tests negative. Contents: No lichen substances reported. Notes: Not recorded from B.C., but known to occur in southern coastal Alaska only a few kilometres from the B.C. border. Sticta fuliginosa (Hoffm.) Ach. Peppered moon (sooty leather lichen) Habitat/Range: Frequent over deciduous trees and conifers, also over mossy rock, in humid forests at lower eleva- tions throughout, except absent from boreal regions; incompletely circumpolar, N to AK, S to CA. Reaction: All spot tests negative. Contents: No lichen substances reported. Sticta limbata (Sm.) Ach. Powdered moon Habitat/Range: Infrequent over deciduous trees and especially mossy rock in open coastal forests at lower eleva- tions, also rare in intermontane (ICH zone); western N Am – eastern N Am – western Eurasia, N to AK, S to CA. Reactions: All spot tests negative. Contents: No lichen substances reported. Sticta weigelii (Ach.) Vainio Map 107 Fringed moon (Weigel’s leather lichen) Habitat/Range: Rare over trees and shrubs in open coastal forests at lower elevations; western N Am – eastern N Am – eastern Eurasia, N to AK, S to CA. Reactions: All spot tests negative. Contents: No lichen substances reported. Sticta wrightii Tuck. Map 108 Green moon Habitat/Range: Rare over conifers in semi-shady intermontane old-growth forests at lower elevations; western N Am – eastern Eurasia, N to AK, S to BC. Reactions: All spot tests negative. Contents: No lichen substances reported. Sticta sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species Check List
    Birds Description Date Location Terns & Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Black Skimmer Sterna caspia Caspian Tern Stema forsteri Forester's Tern Sterna antillarum Least Tern Sterna maxima Royal Tern Gulls Larus philadelphia Bonaparte's Gull Larus marinus Great Black‐backed Gull Larus argentatus Herring Gull Larus atricilla Laughing Gull Larus delawarensis Ring‐billed Gull Boobies & Gannets Morus bassanus Northern Gannet Pelicans Pelecanus occidentalis Brown Pelican Cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus Double‐Crested Cormorant Anhinga Anhinga anhinga Anhinga Loons Gavia immer Common Loon Gavia stellata Red‐throated Loon Grebes PodilymbusPodil ymbus popodicepsdiceps PiPieded‐billbilleded GrebeGrebe Ducks Anas rubripes American Black Duck Anas americana American Wigeon Anas discors Blue‐winged Teal Branta canadensis Canada Goose Mergus merganser Common Merganser Anas strepera Gadwall Aythya marila Greater Scaup Anas crecca Green‐winged Teal Lophodytes cucullatus Hooded Merganser Anas platyrhynchos Mallard Anas fulvigula Mottled Duck Anas clypeata Northern Shoveler Mergus serrator Red‐breasted Merganser Aythya collaris Ring‐Necked Duck Aix sponsa Wood Duck Birds Description Date Location Rails & Northern Jacana Fulica americana American Coot Rallus longirostris Clapper Rail Gallinula chloropus Common Moorhen Rallus elegans King Rail Porzana carolina Sora Long‐legged Waders Nycticorax nycticorax Black‐crowned Night‐Heron Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Plegadis falcinellus Glossy Ibis Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Casmerodius albus Great Egret Butorides
    [Show full text]
  • Biometric Comparisons Between North American and European Mammals
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 1959 Biometric Comparisons between North American and European Mammals. I. A Comparison between Alaskan and Fennoscandian Wolverine (Gulo gulo Linnaeus) Björn Kurtén Institute of Geology and Paleontology of Helsingfors University Robert L. Rausch Arctic Health Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Kurtén, Björn and Rausch, Robert L., "Biometric Comparisons between North American and European Mammals. I. A Comparison between Alaskan and Fennoscandian Wolverine (Gulo gulo Linnaeus)" (1959). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 532. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/532 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Björn Kurtén & Robert L. Rausch in Acta Arctica (1959) Fasc. XI. BIOMETRIC COMPARISONS BETWEEN NORTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN MAMMALS 1. A COMPARISON BETWEEN ALASK.AN AND FENNOSCANDIAN WOLVERINE (GULO GULO LINNAEUS) INTRODUCTION The taxonomy ofmany circumpolar mammals is not at present in a satis(;lctory state. Whercas many European students favour the circumpolar species concept, the approach or Amnican students has often had a provincial tinge. This attitude has been criticized by one ofus (IC\t:SCII, '953)· This holds also for the wolverine or glutton, subject ofthe present study: DEGER""!.
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds
    European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Survival in a Declining Population of The
    Reproductionand Survivalin a Declining Population of the Southern Dunlin Calidris alpina schinzii Paul Eric J6nsson J6nsson,P.E. 1991.Reproduction and Survival in a DecliningPopulation of theSouthern Dunlin Calidrisalpina schinzii. Wader Study Group Bulletin 61, Supplement: 56-68. Reproductivesuccess and survival was studied in a declining population of theSouthern Dunlin in SW Sk,Sne,SSweden, in 1981-1986.Hatching success was low; on average only 30% of clutches hatched, dueto intense nest-predation from mainly Crows, Foxes and mustelids. Some nests (8%) were also lostby tramplingfrom grazing animals. Within a season,there was no significantdifference in hatchingsuccess between early and late clutches, but the overall annual hatching success was higher in yearswith an early onset of breeding.On average,the Dunlins yearly produced 0.3 - 0.4 hatched young/adult.Fledging success was estimated at36% and survival from fledging tothe age of one year at56%. Adult survival, estimated from rerum rates, averaged 89% in males and 77% in females (83% of thesexes combined). The sex-relateddifference in return-ratesbelieved to reflecta loweractuai survivalrate in females, assuggested bythe male-skewed sex-ratio inthe population. The average life expectancyfor an adult Dunlin is estimated at5.4 years and the mean longevity at7.4 years. Survival tendedto decrease with increasing age (up to 5 yearsafter ringing). The oldest bird recorded in the studywas 17 yearsold. The observed reproductive rate was found to be insufficientto maintaina stablepopulation and unless nest-predation issignificantly reduced, the Dunlin will become extinct in SW Sl•ne within20 to 30 years. PaulE. J6nsson,Dept. of Ecology, Ecology Building, University of Lund, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Schedule and Primary Moult in Dunlins <I>Calidris Alpina</I> Of
    29 Breeding scheduleand primary moult in Dunlins Calidris alpina of the Far East Panel S. Tomkoich Tomkovich,P.S. 1998. Breedingschedule and primarymoult in Dunlins Calidris alpina of the Far East. WaderStudy Group Bull. 85:29-34 On Chukotka,the breedinggrounds of the subspeciessakhalina, the primarymoult of Dunlin Calidrisalpina startsin mid-June,at the beginningof theincubation period, and birds migrate southward from thebeginning of August,when the moultis almostcomplete. On Kamchatka(kistchinski) and Sakhalin(actites), where breeding takes place earlier, primary moult startsin July,in the chick rearing period,or evenlater. Thesedifferences between northern and southern populations are similarto thosefound previously in Alaska (Holmes1971). The timing of theseevents is not strictlyrelated to latitude; it is thoughtthat, with localvariations, latitudinal differencesin datesof breedingand primary moult are brought about through subspecific characteristics. Knowledge of subspecific breedingschedules and primary moult periods can be usedtogether with biometricsto assignFar EasternDunlins to different populationsin the post-breedingperiod. P S. Tomkovich,Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University,Bolshaya Nikitskaya Street 6, Moscow103009, Russia. INTRODUCTION Far East are comparedin this study. Two new subspeciesof Dunlin from the Far East, Calidris alpina kistchinski(Tornkovich 1986) and C.a. actites(Nechaev STUDY AREAS AND METHODS & Tornkovich1987, 1988), were describedrecently, in The main data were collectedduring expeditions
    [Show full text]
  • 4: Potential Mineral Resources in Antarctica
    Chapter 4 Potential Mineral Resources in Antarctica Photo credit: U.S. Geological Survey Byrd Glacier CONTENTS Page SUMMARY . 93 INTRODUCTION . 93 GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONS . 96 Relationship to Adjacent Continents . 99 Offshore Shelf Areas . 102 ANTARCTICA IN THE CONTEXT OF FUTURE MINERALS SUPPLY . 103 Prospecting and Exploration in Antarctica . 105 Probabilities of Discovering Antarctic Mineral Deposits . 110 SELECTED MINERAL RESOURCES ● . 111 Oil and Gas . .. 111 coal . .114 Uranium . 114 Chromium . .115 Copper . 116 Gold . 117 Iron . .118 Molybdenum . .119 Platinum-Group Metals . .119 Rare-Earth Metals . .120 Diamonds . .. 122 Boxes Box Page 4-A. Mineral Resources and Reserves . 95 4-B. Geologic Time Scale . 98 4-C. Icebergs . 121 Figures Figure Page 4-1. Antarctic Mineral Occurrences . 97 4-2. Geologic Provinces of Antarctica and Their Relationship to Adjacent Gondwana Continents . 100 4-3. Reconstruction of Gondwana in Early Cretaceus Time . 103 4-4. Exposed Rock Outcrop in Antarctica . .. 106 4-5. What Antarctica Would Look Like If the Ice Were Removed . 107 4-6. Multichannel Seismic Data . .. 108 4-7. Sedimentary Basins in Antarctica . ,.. , 112 Tables Table Page 4-1. Desirable Research for Evaluating Resource Potential of Antarctica . 110 4-2. Research Required To Ensure That Petroleum Resources Are Safely and Efficiently Recovered With Minimum Environmental Impact . 110 4-3. Estimated Number of Major Mineral Deposits in Antarctica . 112 Chapter 4 Potential Mineral Resources in Antarctica SUMMARY The offshore sedimentary basins surrounding Antarctica offer the best prospects for petroleum Scientists have discovered occurrences (small exploration. The Weddell and Ross embayments in amounts) of several minerals in Antarctica, but West Antarctica, and Prydz Bay and the Wilkes there are no known mineral deposits of commer- Basin in East Antarctica are among the basins most cial interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Peeps and Related Sandpipers Peeps Are a Group of Diminutive Sandpipers That Are Notoriously Hard to Tell Apart
    Peeps and Related Sandpipers Peeps are a group of diminutive sandpipers that are notoriously hard to tell apart. They belong to a subfamily of subarctic and arctic nesting sandpipers known as the Calidridinae (in the sandpiper family, Scolopacidae). During their migrations, when most residents of North America have the opportunity to watch them, mixed flocks of calidridine sandpipers scurry about on mudflats, feeding at the edge of the retreating tide, or swarm aloft, twisting and turning like a dense school of fish. These traits, in a group of birds that look so much alike to start with, give bird watchers nightmares. Fortunately for Alaskans and visitors to our state, Alaska is an excellent location to view and identify calidridine sandpipers. The early summer breeding season is the easiest time of the year to distinguish the various species, not only because they are in breeding plumage and are more approachable than at other times of the year, but also because each species performs a characteristic courtship display with unique vocalizations. For the avid birder, Alaska has the additional attraction of being one of the best places in North America to view exotic Eurasian species. General description: Three peeps are abundant summer residents and breeders in Alaska—the least, semipalmated, and western sandpipers (Calidris minutilla, C. pusilla, and C. mauri) [all lists in order by size]. Another four species from Eurasia may also be seen—the little, rufous-necked, Temminck's, and long-toed stints (“stint” is the British equivalent for peep) (C. minuta, C. ruficollis, C. temminckii, C. subminuta). These seven species range from 5 to 6½ inches (15-17 cm) in length, and weigh from 2/3 to 1½ ounces (17-33 g).
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebirds and Horseshoe Crabs in Jamaica Bay: 2014 Update
    Shorebirds and Horseshoe Crabs in Jamaica Bay: 2014 Update credit: Don Riepe Debra Kriensky, New York City Audubon Harbor Herons Working Group Annual Meeting –Dec. 11‐12, 2014 Photo Credit: coastaloutdooradventures.com Sanderling Ruddy Turnstone Red Knot Shorebird Migration Semipalmated Sandpiper Dunlin http://fossilcollector.wordpress.com/ Photo Credit: marinebio.org www.allposters.com Jamaica Bay JBWR Big Egg Marsh Plumb Beach Dead Horse Bay Bay Dunes Shorebird monitoring sites Horseshoe crab monitoring sites CITIZEN SCIENCE Horseshoe Crab Monitoring 2009‐2014 Average # of HSC Counted per Sampling Night 350 Note: Different sampling methods 300 used at PBW & DHB in 2014 Night 250 Sampling per 200 Plumb Beach Dead Horse Bay Counted 150 Big Egg Marsh HSC Plumb Beach West of # 100 Average 50 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year Plumb Beach June 2012 vs. November 2012 Shorebird Monitoring 2009‐2014 Maximum Count per Species ‐ Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge 3000 2500 American Oystercatcher Black‐bellied Plover 2000 Dunlin Least Sandpiper Red Knot 1500 Ruddy Turnstone Sanderling Semipalmated Plover 1000 Semipalmated Sandpiper Short‐billed Dowitcher White‐rumped Sandpiper 500 Willet 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Shorebird Monitoring 2009‐2014 Maximum Count per Species ‐ Plumb Beach 3500 3000 American Oystercatcher Black‐bellied Plover 2500 Dunlin Least Sandpiper Red Knot 2000 Ruddy Turnstone Sanderling 1500 Semipalmated Plover Semipalmated Sandpiper Short‐billed Dowitcher 1000 White‐rumped Sandpiper Willet 500 TOTAL HSC 0 2009 2010 2011 2012
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Satellite Views Iceberg
    National Weather Digest WEATHER SATELLITE VIEWS ICEBERG by Henry W. Brandli (1) During the first week in November 1987, an iceberg, twice to the shore of the Arabian Peninsula. Officials say that the size of the state of Rhode Island, broke away from Ant­ satellites will be used to spot the masses of ice that tugboats arctica and was drifting in the Ross Sea. The iceberg broke will move toward the equator. Researchers estimate the proj­ from the Ross Ice Shelf, a region of freshwater ice formed ect will take several months. The icebergs' massiveness should from snow, at a point called the Bay of Whales. keep them from melting away in transit." Icebergs often break away from the Antarctic ice shelves Earth resources satellites of the US, France and Russia, where they are affected by weather and tidal forces. This also can view the iceberg, but not as frequently as polar­ new iceberg (B 9) equaled two to three times the amount of orbiting weather spacecraft. Also, weather satellite imagery ice that normally breaks free in a year. On 19 February 1988 , (visual/infrared, microwave, etc.) provide other important the Defense Meteorological Satellite (DMSP) obtained a visual factors affecting the giant "ice cube," i.e. wind , water tem­ view of the iceberg (Fig. I). The iceberg was about 25 miles peratures, ocean currents, rain, etc. And the DMSP has the wide and 98 miles long, for an area of2,450 square miles and best resolution of any meteorological satellite. estimated at 750 feet thick. An interesting concept appeared in a recent issue ofInsight Magazine: "Equatorial lands in need offresh water may soon NOTES AND REFERENCES have access to a new source, Antarctic icebergs.
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015
    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sites and Plant Communities for the Alpine Subregion
    1 ECOLOGICAL SITES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES FOR THE ALPINE SUBREGION First approximation 2021 Prepared by: M.G. Willoughby and A.J. Gould Alberta Government Edmonton i ISBN No.: 978-1-4601-5057-3 (Online Edition) For information on this report contact: Michael G. Willoughby 9920 108 Street, 4th Floor Edmonton, AB (780) 422-4598 E-mail: [email protected] This publication is the property of the Government of Alberta and is available under the Alberta Open Government Licence (http://open.alberta.ca/licence) and the publication is available online at: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/ecological-sites-plant-communities-alpine-subregion-first-approximation © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Forestry, 2021 ii Table of Contents ECOLOGICAL SITES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES FOR THE ALPINE SUBREGION ...................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................................................vii
    [Show full text]