DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Report: Sustainable Solutions to Improve The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Report: Sustainable Solutions to Improve The Project 353 Draft report: Sustainable solutions to improve quality of drinking water affected by high arsenic contents in 3 Vojvodinian regions LOKACIJA “BEZDAN-APATIN” LOKACIJA “KNICANIN-CENTA” LOKACIJA LOKACIJA “POTPORANJ” “JAMENA-KURJAKOVAC” LOKACIJA “JARAK-KLENAK” LOKACIJA “KOVIN-DUBOVAC” Date 20.12.2005 Project# 353 DRAFT REPORT: SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER AFFECTED BY HIGH ARSENIC CONTENTS IN 3 VOJVODINIAN REGIONS Book II: Groundwater sources Stadt Wien MA 31 – Water Management -2.1- Project 353 Draft report: Sustainable solutions to improve quality of drinking water affected by high arsenic contents in 3 Vojvodinian regions TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 GROUNDWATER SOURCES.......................................................................................................... 2.7 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 2.7 2.2 SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE DATA AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT GROUNDWATER SOURCES ADDRESSED IN THE STUDY .......................................................................................................... 2.9 2.3 HYDROGEOLOGICAL AND HYDRODYNAMIC FEATURES OF WESTERN BAČKA ............................. 2.10 2.3.1 The Quaternary Aquifer in Western Ba čka............................................................................ 2.10 2.3.2 Pliocene aquifers in Western Ba čka ...................................................................................... 2.12 2.4 OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT WATER SOURCE SITUATION IN WESTERN BAČKA AND IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR PROBLEMS ....................................................................................................2.15 2.4.1 Municipality of Sombor.......................................................................................................... 2.15 2.4.1.1 Sombor ................................................................................................................................................ 2.16 2.4.1.2 Aleksa Šanti ć....................................................................................................................................... 2.18 2.4.1.3 Ba čki Breg........................................................................................................................................... 2.20 2.4.1.4 Ba čki Monoštor................................................................................................................................... 2.21 2.4.1.5 Bezdan ................................................................................................................................................. 2.23 2.4.1.6 Gakovo ................................................................................................................................................ 2.23 2.4.1.7 Doroslovo............................................................................................................................................ 2.25 2.4.1.8 Kljaji ćevo ............................................................................................................................................ 2.27 2.4.1.9 Kolut .................................................................................................................................................... 2.28 2.4.1.10 Rastina ................................................................................................................................................. 2.29 2.4.1.11 Ri ñica................................................................................................................................................... 2.31 2.4.1.12 Svetozar Mileti ć.................................................................................................................................. 2.32 2.4.1.13 Staniši ć ................................................................................................................................................ 2.34 2.4.1.14 Stapar................................................................................................................................................... 2.35 2.4.1.15 Ele čka .................................................................................................................................................. 2.36 2.4.1.16 Čonoplja .............................................................................................................................................. 2.37 2.4.2 Municipality of Apatin ........................................................................................................... 2.41 2.4.2.1 Apatin .................................................................................................................................................. 2.42 2.4.2.2 Kupusina.............................................................................................................................................. 2.48 2.4.2.3 Prigrevica............................................................................................................................................. 2.50 2.4.2.4 Sonta .................................................................................................................................................... 2.50 2.4.3 The Municipality of Kula ....................................................................................................... 2.53 2.4.3.1 Kula...................................................................................................................................................... 2.54 2.4.3.2 Crvenka................................................................................................................................................ 2.56 2.4.3.3 Kruš čić................................................................................................................................................. 2.57 2.4.3.4 Lipar..................................................................................................................................................... 2.59 2.4.3.5 Nova Crvenka ..................................................................................................................................... 2.60 2.4.3.6 Ruski Krstur ........................................................................................................................................ 2.62 -2.2- Project 353 Draft report: Sustainable solutions to improve quality of drinking water affected by high arsenic contents in 3 Vojvodinian regions 2.4.3.7 Sivac .................................................................................................................................................... 2.63 2.4.4 The Municipality of Odzaci.................................................................................................... 2.66 2.4.4.1 Odžaci.................................................................................................................................................. 2.67 2.4.4.2 Ba čki Brestovac .................................................................................................................................. 2.69 2.4.4.3 Ba čki Gra čac ....................................................................................................................................... 2.71 2.4.4.4 Bogojevo ............................................................................................................................................. 2.72 2.4.4.5 Deronje ................................................................................................................................................ 2.73 2.4.4.6 Karavukovo......................................................................................................................................... 2.75 2.4.4.7 Lali ć..................................................................................................................................................... 2.76 2.4.4.8 Ratkovo................................................................................................................................................ 2.77 2.4.4.9 Srpski Mileti ć...................................................................................................................................... 2.79 2.5 OVERVIEW OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF BA Č, VRBAS , SRBOBRAN , BEČEJ AND NOVI BEČEJ ........................................................................................................ 2.82 2.5.1 The municipality of Ba č ......................................................................................................... 2.82 2.5.2 The municipality of Vrbas...................................................................................................... 2.83 2.5.3 The municipality of Srbobran ................................................................................................ 2.84 2.5.4 The municipality of Be čej....................................................................................................... 2.85 2.5.5 The municipality of Novi Be čej .............................................................................................. 2.87 2.6 CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF OPTIMUM SOLUTIONS FOR DRINKING WATER SUPPLY .......... 2.90 2.7 LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF WATER SOURCES .................. 2.91 2.8 COST ESTIMATES FOR THE PROPOSED SOLUTIONS .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PLEASE NOTE: This Book Contains Graphic Description of Inhuman Acts
    PLEASE NOTE: This book contains graphic description of inhuman acts committed by a small but unfortunately significant segment of the Serb nation. It is published for the information of politicians, diplomats, historians, soldiers, reporters and other professionals. Not recommended to the general public. To keep one's sanity it should be read with total professional detachment. Please read POSTSCRIPTUM on page 162 before you start reading the book. It will give you basic knowledge and better understanding of the true nature of the Partisan Warfare. The Publisher TITOIST ATROCITIES in VOJVODINA 1944-1945 SERBIAN VENDETTA IN BACSKA TIBOR CSERES HUNYADI PUBLISHING Copyright © Tibor Cseres 1993 All rights reserved First edition in the English Language Hunyadi Publishing Buffalo, NY - Toronto, Ont. Hungarian title: VERBOSSZU BACSKABAN Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 92-76218 ISBN 1-882785-01-0 Manufactured in the United States of America 9 AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION At the end of World War I, the southern part of the thousand year old historical Hungary was occupied by Serbian troops. Under the terms of the Paris Peace Treaty in 1921 it was annexed to the Serbo-Croat-Slovenian Kingdom, that later became Yugoslavia. The new name of this territory, situated to the east of present Croatia, was VOJVODINA (also spelled Voivodina or Voyvodina). Its former Hungarian name had been Bacska and Banat. During World War II, in 1941, Germany occupied Yugoslavia. At the same time, Hungary took possession of and re-annexed VOJVODINA from divided Yugoslavia. At the end of 1944, the Serbs reoccupied Bacska, which has belonged to Serbia ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944
    Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 edited by: Sanela Schmid Milovan Pisarri Tomislav Dulić Zoran Janjetović Milan Koljanin Milovan Pisarri Thomas Porena Sabine Rutar Sanela Schmid 1 Project partners: Project supported by: Forced Labour in Serbia 2 Producers, Consumers and Consequences . of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 This collection of scientific papers on forced labour during the Second World War is part of a wider research within the project "Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour - Serbia 1941-1944", which was implemented by the Center for Holocaust Research and Education from Belgrade in partnership with Humboldt University, Berlin and supported by the Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future" in Germany. ("Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft" - EVZ). 3 Impressum Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941-1944 Published by: Center for Holocaust Research and Education Publisher: Nikola Radić Editors: Sanela Schmid and Milovan Pisarri Authors: Tomislav Dulić Zoran Janjetović Milan Koljanin Milovan Pisarri Thomas Porena Sabine Rutar Sanela Schmid Proofreading: Marija Šapić, Marc Brogan English translation: Irena Žnidaršić-Trbojević German translation: Jovana Ivanović Graphic design: Nikola Radić Belgrade, 2018. Project partners: Center for Holocaust Research and Education Humboldt University Berlin Project is supported by: „Remembrance, Responsibility And Future“ Foundation „Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft“ - EVZ Forced Labour in Serbia 4 Producers, Consumers and Consequences . of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 Contents 6 Introduction - Sanela Schmid and Milovan Pisarri 12 Milovan Pisarri “I Saw Jews Carrying Dead Bodies On Stretchers”: Forced Labour and The Holocaust in Occupied Serbia 30 Zoran Janjetović Forced Labour in Banat Under Occupation 1941 - 1944 44 Milan Koljanin Camps as a Source of Forced Labour in Serbia 1941 - 1944 54 Photographs 1 62 Sabine Rutar Physical Labour and Survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers Protest in Serbia: 'Most Fertile Land Is Given to Arabs'
    Search HOME ABOUT EVENT S GALLERY PUBLISH SUBSCRIBE HELP English/all Farmers protest in Serbia: ‘Most fertile land is given to Liberia: Cease governmental Arabs’ surveillance and harassment against human rights advocates defending land Published: 28 Jul 2014 and natural resource rights. Send Short URL: http://farmlandgrab.org/23773 letter to President Sirleaf Posted in: Abu Dhabi | Serbia | UAE Comments (0) Print Email this Tell T IAA-CREF to go deforestation inSerbia | 28 July 2014 and land grab-free! Farmers protest in Serbia: ‘Most f ertile land is given to Arabs’ Who's involved? Farmers from villages and settlements of Sivac, Kruscic, Lipar and Crvenka in Vojvodina are outraged at the Ministry Select Category of Agriculture of Serbia, which leased more than 3,000 hectares of the best arable land to the company “Al Farmers from Kula, Serbia block the Rafaved” from the United Arab Emirates for 250 euros per center of the municipality with their Posts Comments hectare. tractors, demanding an explanation of what is behind the decision of the Recent posts They demand that Ministry explain why this fertile land has Ministry of Agriculture to lease 3,000 been exempted from the lease program based on the hectares of the best arable land to the Huile de palme : Greenpeace cible preferential rent, or why the state has not offered the land UAE company Al Rawafed under the most HSBC to them first, and then the Arabs. Farmers from Kula, at the favorable conditions. 17 Jan 2017 | No Comments protest rally in front of the local municipality building, said that it is inconceivable that Serbia leases the land to “Al Rafaved” for only 250 euros per hectare, Niger-Arabie Saoudite : des without public bidding.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Small Religious Communities of Yugoslavia
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 3 Issue 6 Article 2 9-1983 The Small Religious Communities of Yugoslavia Rudolf Grulich Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Grulich, Rudolf (1983) "The Small Religious Communities of Yugoslavia," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 3 : Iss. 6 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol3/iss6/2 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. l THE SMALL RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES OF YUGOSLAVIA by Rudolf Grulich Th e Old Catholics Th e Croatian bishop Josip Jura j Stro ssmay er of Djakovo was th e most outspo ken oppon ent of th e dogma of papal infallibility at th e First Vatican Council , and also th e last bi shop to accept th e council 's decre es in 18 73, thr ee years aft er th e meet ing . Th ere was , how ever, no Old Catholic mov ement in th e Croatian dioc es es at that tim e, although th e situation was diff erent in th e German-sp eaking ar eas of middl e Europ e. This was becaus e the imp erial gov ernment in Vi enna was against th e Old Catholic mov ement .
    [Show full text]
  • QUANTITATIVE PRESENCE of Macropirytes in BASIC CHANNEL NETWORK of HYDROSYSTEM DANUBE - TISZA - DANUBE
    TISCIA28,25 23. QUANTITATIVE PRESENCE OF MACROPIryTES IN BASIC CHANNEL NETWORK OF HYDROSYSTEM DANUBE - TISZA - DANUBE M. Vudkovid,S. Stojanovii, Z. Stankovii,M. Zderii,P. Kilibarda, Lj. Radakand S. Radulovii Vutko|ii, M., Stoja o"ic, 3., Stankovii, Z.,Zdetic, M., Kilibarda, P., Ratlak, Lj. and Rarlulowc, S. (1994): Quantitatil,e prcsence of mac,aphytes itl basic cha let ,rctuo* af Hldlosystent Dan|be'Tisra " Danube.- Tiscia28, 25-28. Abstract. Quantitativepresence of aqualic vascularplants is given at certain sectionsof Hydrosyst€mDanube - Tisza - Danubein Backarchannels Vftas - Bezdan,Backi Petrovac- Karavlrkovoand Jegricka. Among submerg€d plants which e not rooted,species Ceftltophyllw denetstrtt is the most fr€quentin all sections.From subnergedplants that are rooted, b,tiaphrlln spicatu,nsnd Vdlisneriaspimlis h^ve the gr€atestquantitative presence. Floating non rootedhydrophytes are smrll floatingflowering plants and waler ferns. Spi,odela poltrhin, Lenna gibba, Sah,inianatdns and Azolla ceohtiara havehigh coverage values at certninspots. From grcupoffloating rootedbydrophytes, mosl numerousare napa nata t, Nylrphaeaalba, Nuphar l*eun ^nd Nyutphoides$a,ra. Due to greal surfaceand big floating leaves,they are coverioglarge areas of watermirror, especially in channelvrbas - Bezdan.Among numerous emergedmacrophytes giving coastzone of all channels,highest panicipalion is of PhruEniles co n t.]', TrphuatE|stifoltu andGlrcoia n'arnll,a.It is con€ludedthrt differencesin florislic siruclureand quantitative presence ofvafious lif€ fonnsofaquatic plants in investigatedsection! of HydrosystemDarube ' Tiszn- Danubeare due to differentage ofchann€ls (30 to 200 years), differenlpbysico-chenical conditions of aquaticenvironment, purpose functions of chanlels, poilutiondegree and application of differentprotection measures. Keyrords: Hydrosysten Da tbc - Tiszd - Da,,rtbe, hydrcph),ta,Jlotistic sbuctne, ecalosicctl grc ps, quantit ti'e ptesence.
    [Show full text]
  • 105 Multe Construcţii Rurale Clar Ridicate Sub Protecţie Militară 522
    (87–89 p. Chr.), când romanii să fi pretins o terra deserta în faţa spaţiului cucerit, multe construcţii rurale clar ridicate sub protecţie militară522. Am cita doar iar aşezările dacice să se fi fost retras înspre interiorul Banatului sau chiar spre descoperirile de la Devin523, Bratislava-Dubravka524. Acolo, ele apar mai ales după Transilvania. Acest teritoriu rămânea un spaţiu liber fără o populaţie barbară războaiele marcomanice. În cazul nostru, acest lucru nu se poate încă prea bine controlat de Imperiu Roman. Nu se cunosc nici un fel de aşezări din interiorul preciza cronologic. În ce măsură avem de a face cu un control militar al Moesiei Banatului, care să-şi fi încetat existenţa la sfârşitul secolului I p. Chr. Superior în teritoriul de la nord de Dunăre, acest lucru a fost presupus şi probabil să Dacă am avea în vedere reprezentările de pe scenele Columnei lui Traian de fi şi reprezentat o realitate în antichitate525, mai ales pentru descoperirile de la la Roma, unde se constată de abia, după 16 scene de la trecerea armatei romane la Pancevo, Cuvin, Gaj, localităţi aflate în faţa valului median. nord de fluviu, apariţia primelor contacte ale armatei romane cu daci izolaţi, aduşi Prezenţa ştampilelor legiunii a VII-a Claudia (de tipul LEG VII C.P.F) la în faţa romanilor, ar trebui să presupunem că localnicii se retraseră din acel Banatska Palanka, Vrsac demonstrează existenţa aici a unor unităţi militare încă în teritoriu. Când anume a avut loc acest lucru nu putem încă preciza, deocamdată. vremea împăraţilor Traian – Hadrian. Ele ar putea fi puse în legătură cu pregătirile Recent, descoperirea sitului de la Unip (com.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribucija
    Distribucija Pored direktne prodaje Firma EKO DAR plasira svoje proizvode i putem distributivne mreže. Sledeći specijalizovani distributivni lanci predstavljaju naše poslovne saradnike i u njihovim objektima kupci mogu pribaviti naše proizvode: VELEPRODAJA MALOPRODAJA HEMOSLAVIJA DOO POLJOMARKET DOO AGROCENTAR PEJAK GAŠIĆ DP TR APATIN Stevana Sinđelića 17 Rade Končara 22 Đure Đakovića 29 Lađarska bb 21000 Novi Sad 25260 Apatin 25260 Apatin 25260 Apatin www.hemoslavija.co.rs SKALAGREEN DOO MALA BOSNA 1 STR MALA BOSNA 2 STR AGROHEMIKA PA Segedinski put 90 Save Kovačevića bb Nikole Tesle 65 Novosadska bb 24000 Subotica 25260 Apatin 25260 Apatin 23207 Aradac www.skalagreen.com POLJOPRIVREDNA APOTEKA RAS GEBI TOV TR AGROHEMIKA PA AGROHEMIKA PA Prhovačka 38, Nikole Tesle 28 Svetozara Markovića 45 Mladena Stojanovića 46 22310 Šimanovci 21420 Bač 21400 Bačka Palanka 21234 Bački Jarak www.apotekaras.rs AGRO-DUKAT DOO AGROHEMIKA PA AGROHEMIKA PA ROBINIA DOO Konstantina Danila bb Lenjinova 35 Svatoplukova 14 Đure Đakovića 29 23000 Zrenjanin 21470 Bački Petrovac 21470 Bački Petrovac 24300 Bačka Topola www.agrodukat.rs METEOR COMMERCE DOO HV PARTNER PA PA MIKRA COOP ZZ PRIMA Staparski Put bb Maršala Tita br.71 Jovana Popovića 8 Beogradska 146 25000 Sombor 24300 Bačka Topola 24300 Bačka Topola 24415 Bački Vinogradi www.meteorkomerc.com HALOFARM DOO OZZ ZORA SZABO KONCENTRAT HV PARTNER PA Matije Gupca 53 Branka Ćopića 20 SHOP Železnička 66 24000 Subotica 21429 Bačko Novo Selo Dr Imrea Kiša 48 24210 Bajmok www.halofarmsubotica.com 21226 Bačko Petrovo
    [Show full text]
  • Alibunar Prostorni Plan Op[Tine R-1:50000
    PROSTORNI PLAN OP[TINE ALIBUNAR SE^AW S R-1:50000 NEUZINA SE^AW MAGISTRALNI KANAL HS DTD NOVI BE^EJ - BANATSKA PALANKA - I Z V O D - 14 PLANDI[TE DOBRICA ORLOVAT ZREWANIN 13 7 DP II REDA BR.123 12 15 JERMENOVCI POLO@AJ PREDMETNOG PDR-a U [IREM OKRU@EWU 10 PLANDI[TE 6 11 16 JANO[IK ILANXA NOVI KOZJAK 5 2 9 REFERALNA KARTA BROJ 1 VR[AC 4 GRANICA RUMUNIJE LOKVE NAMENA PROSTORA 26 GRANICA OBUHVATA PLANA - GRANICA OP[TINE GRANICA KATASTARSKE OP[TINE KOVA^ICA GRANICA PPPPN SRP "DELIBLATSKA PE[^ARA" ȽRANICA SRP "DELIBLATSKA PE[^ARA" 3 25 postoje}e planirano REDA BR.125 II POQOPRIVREDNO ZEMQI[TE DP SELEU[ 22 + WIVE I VRTOVI PADINA DP VO]ARSKO-VINOGRADARSKE ZONE II REDA BR.110 VO]WACI I VINOGRADI - PLANTA@E LIVADE I PA[WACI TRSTICI I MO^VARE RIBWAK [UMSKO ZEMQI[TE [UME I [UMSKO ZEMQI[TE ZA[TITNI POJASEVI VODNO ZEMQI[TE 20 NASIP I ODBRAMBENE LINIJE ALIBUNAR MAGISTRALNI KANAL GLAVNI KANALI GRA\EVINSKO ZEMQI[TE 17 GRA\EVINSKO PODRU^JE NASEQA (POSTOJE]E / PLANIRANO) DR@AVNA GRANICA SA RUMUNIJOM 1 - 7 8 - 15 RADNE ZONE VAN GRA\EVINSKOG PODRU^JA NASEQA TURISTI^KO REKREATIVNI LOKALITET - IZLETI[TE "DEVOJA^KI BUNAR" ZONA SPORTSKO-REKREATIVNOG I ZDRAVSTVENOG TURIZMA UQMA TURISTI^KO REKREATIVNI LOKALITET "BANATSKI BISER" DP I REDA BR.1.9 16 TURISTI^KI LOKALITET ZA ZDRAVSTVENI (VELNES) TURIZAM "BAWA JANO[IK" 1 VR[AC 17 TURISTI^KO REKREATIVNI LOKALITET "BELI BAGER" + 21 18 ZONA TURISTI^KIH SADR@AJA I KU]A ZA ODMOR 24 NIKOLINCI BANATSKI KARLOVAC 19 / 1,2,3 20 ZONA KU]A ZA ODMOR 21 + 22 GROBQA VAN GRA\EVINSKOG PODRU^JA NASEQA PLANIRANA TRANSFER STANICA I DEPONIJA
    [Show full text]
  • Churches in Serbia and Germany in Dialogue
    TOWARD THE HEALING OF MEMORIES AND CHANGING OF PERCEPTIONS: CHURCHES IN SERBIA AND GERMANY IN DIALOGUE A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Angela V. Ilić MAY 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Leonard J. Swidler, Advisory Chair, Department of Religion Dr. Terry Rey, Department of Religion Dr. John C. Raines, Department of Religion Dr. Paul B. Mojzes, Rosemont College Dr. Kyriakos M. Kontopoulos, External Reader, Department of Sociology © by Angela Valeria Ilić 2012 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines a series of interchurch consultations that took place between 1999 and 2009 with the participation of the Evangelical Church in Germany, the Roman Catholic German Bishops’ Conference and the Serbian Orthodox Church. The Protestant-Catholic-Orthodox ecumenical encounters began in the immediate aftermath of the Kosovo crisis, and aimed to support Serbia’s democratization and European integration. At a total of nine meetings, delegates from the participating churches, together with politicians, representatives of non-governmental organizations, and scholars from various fields, discussed the role of churches and religion in the two countries. The meetings provided a forum for exchanging knowledge and addressing the challenges confronting the churches and their social organizations. Through lectures, discussions, and meetings in working groups, the consultations focused on theological, legal, political, and social topics, such as church and state relations in Serbia, the role of churches in secularized society, Serbia’s relationship to the rest of Europe, reconciliation, and the healing of memories. Focusing on the content and the outcomes of the consultations, the author places them into the broader ecumenical, social and political context in which they took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects and Profitability of Land Consolidation Projects: Case Study – the Republic of Serbia
    ISSN 1330-3651 (Print), ISSN 1848-6339 (Online) https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20190401195229 Subject review Effects and Profitability of Land Consolidation Projects: Case Study – the Republic of Serbia Jelena LAZIĆ, Goran MARINKOVIĆ*, Mirko BORISOV, Milan TRIFKOVIĆ, Ilija GRGIĆ Abstract: An analysis of profitability and effects of land consolidation (LC) projects has been made in this paper. The measurable effects of land consolidation resulting from land consolidation goals such as: increase of average area of parcel, decrease of average number of parcels per participant as well as the change in the area of road and canal networks after the land consolidation projects were considered. Profitability was analysed from the aspect of return on investments and net present value of investment in land consolidation. Materials and methods for this study encompass a representative sample from Vojvodina, a part of the Republic of Serbia which is flatland and predominately orientated to agricultural production. The study results indicate that the effects of land consolidation are good and that land consolidation projects are highly profitable. Keywords: agricultural production; land consolidation; net present value; profitability 1 INTRODUCTION fragmented agricultural land were land consolidated, while from 2002 to 2013, 5×106 hectares of fragmented The land consolidation is a planned process through agricultural land was involved in land consolidation which the arrangement of land parcels and ownership over process [17]. These figures indicate that interest and need them is performed [1]. Land consolidation is also defined for land consolidation increase continuously and in many as a process through which the small parcels are integrated countries significance and benefits of land consolidation and form continuous and centralized land in areas where were recognised.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Fusarium Verticillioides and F
    UDC 575:632 DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1201163T Original scientific paper DIVERSITY OF THE FUSARIUM VERTICILLIOIDES AND F. PROLIFERATUM ISOLATES ACCORDING TO THEIR FUMONISIN B 1 PRODUCTION POTENCIAL AND ORIGIN Sonja TAN ČIĆ1, Slavica STANKOVI Ć2, Jelena LEVI Ć2, Vesna KRNJAJA 3, Jelena VUKOJEVI Ć4 1Laboratory of Phytopathology, Oilcrops Department, Institute of field and vegetable crops, Novi Sad, Serbia 2 Laboratory of Phytopathology, Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje, Serbia 3Institute of Animal Husbandry, Zemun, Serbia 4 Department of Algaeology, Mycology and Lichenology, University of Biology Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia Tan čić S., S. Stankovi ć, J. Levi ć, V. Krnjaja and J. Vukojevi ć (2012): Diversity of the Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum isolates according to their fumonisin B 1 production potencial and origin - Genetika, Vol 44, No. 1,163 -176. Species of the genus Fusarium are characterised by the exceptional intraspecies and interspecies variability in respect to morphological, physiological and genetic properties. Intraspecies and interspecies diversity of Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium proliferatum isolates in the production of fumonisin B 1 according to their origin from maize and wheat grains was studied. Fumonisin B 1 production potential of ____________________________ Corresponding author: Sonja Tan čić, Institute of vegetable and field crops,p hone +38121 4898425, +38164 8706073,Fax number: +38121 6413833,e-mail address: [email protected] 164 GENETIKA, Vol. 44, No.1, 163-176, 2012 investigated 42 isolates was assessed by HPTLC and ELISA method. All 22 and 20 investigated F. verticillioides and F. proliferatum isolates, respectively, had the ability to produce fumonisin B 1 toxin. Fumonisin B 1 production potential of F.
    [Show full text]