Hak Cipta Dan Penggunaan Kembali: Lisensi Ini Mengizinkan Setiap
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Supply RETAIL SECTOR
Research & Forecast Report Jakarta I Retail Accelerating success. “Limited new retail supply in DKI Jakarta brought the After the start of operations of Baywalk Mall, which is located occupancy rate up 2% to 89.3%. In contrast, the greater within the Green Bay Pluit Complex, Jakarta saw little new retail Jakarta area outside DKI Jakarta registered a slight decline space provided from the extension projects at Mall Puri Indah in occupancy to 82% due to the opening of two new retail (around 3,000 sq m) and Mall Kelapa Gading (around 6,000 sq centers. In the meantime, the average asking base rental m). These extended spaces are designed as F&B areas. With rate in Jakarta climbed by 3.3% q-o-q to IDR491,675 / sq m the small addition, the Jakarta retail cumulative supply moved / month. Similarly in the greater Jakarta area, the average upward to 4.32 million sq m as of 1Q 2014. Of this, 2.86 million sq asking base rent moved to IDR302,618 / sq m / month, m or 66.3% was marketed for lease. representing a 9.2% increase compared to last quarter.” Historically, after growing by 10% and bringing huge supply to - Ferry Salanto, Associate Director | Research the market in 2009, the annual growth of supply of retail space in Jakarta began weakening. From 2010 to 2013, the average growth was only 3.6% per year. In 2014, the growth of supply for shopping centres in Jakarta will continue declining. Although St RETAIL SECTOR Moritz is a huge mall expected to enter the market, overall, the total additional supply is only 138,200 sq m. -
PROVINSI : DKI JAKARTA KABUPATEN/KOTA : KOTA JAKARTA BARAT BULAN : MEI TAHUN 2021 DAFTAR PERUBAHAN PEMILIH HASIL PDPB Model A-DP
Model A-DPB DAFTAR PERUBAHAN PEMILIH HASIL PDPB TAHUN 2021 PROVINSI : DKI JAKARTA KABUPATEN/KOTA : KOTA JAKARTA BARAT BULAN : MEI Status Status Jenis NO Perekaman No Nama Kecamatan Nama Kelurahan Nama Perkawinan Kelamin Disabilitas Keterangan *) TPS KTP e/l B/S/P L/P B/S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 009 ZEFANYA AURELIA B P 0 S P 2 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 022 EDI SETIAWAN B L 0 S P 3 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 024 DESSY MAYASARI P P 0 S B 4 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 035 MUHAMMAD FARID RAFFI B L 0 S P 5 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 038 CARLO ADITYA RABBANY B L 0 S P 6 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 058 ARISTI AYUNING TYAS B P 0 S P 7 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 062 NUR AINI P P 0 S B 8 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 067 RIZAL FAIZAL AM S L 0 S B 9 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 069 GRACIELA ARIETHA WILHELMINA B P 0 S P 10 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 080 MIA ADELIA MAHARANI B P 0 S P 11 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 087 AHMAD REYHAN B L 0 S P 12 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 100 MAYLIN JUNIAR B P 0 S P 13 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 106 APRIL LIANSYAH B P 0 S P 14 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 117 MUHAMMAD FACHRIZAL B L 0 S P 15 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 129 M. IZZET DALIMUNTHE B L 0 S P 16 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 131 ROY CORNELIUS BASUKI B L 0 S P 17 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 135 WIDYA SALSABILLAH B P 0 S P 18 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 147 DHELA JUNIAR B P 0 S P 19 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 150 WILLIAM FRIEDRICK JENSEN B L 0 S P 20 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG BARAT 168 ELISA FADILAH B P 0 S P 21 CENGKARENG CENGKARENG -
PT Agung Podomoro Land Tbk
PT Agung Podomoro Land Tbk Public Expose 2 Desember 2019 0 Disclaimer Presentasi ini dipersiapkan semata-mata dan secara eksklusif untuk para pihak terundang untuk tujuan diskusi. Baik presentasi maupun isinya tidak boleh diperbanyak, atau digunakan tanpa izin tertulis dari PT Agung Podomoro Land Tbk. Presentasi ini dapat berisi pernyataan yang menyampaikan harapan berorientasi masa depan yang mewakili pandangan Perusahaan saat ini untuk perkiraan kejadian dan keuangan masa depan. Pandangan tersebut disajikan berdasarkan asumsi saat ini, yang mungkin memiliki berbagai risiko dan potensi perubahan. Disajikan berdasarkan asumsi yang dianggap benar pada saat ini, dan berdasarkan data yang tersedia pada saat presentasi ini dibuat. Perusahaan tidak dapat menjaminan bahwa pandangan tersebut akan, sebagian atau secara keseluruhan, akhirnya terwujud. Hasil yang sebenarnya dapat berbeda secara signifikan dari yang diproyeksikan. 1 Agenda 1. Tentang Perusahaan 2. Kinerja Operasional 3. Kinerja Keuangan 2 PT Agung Podomoro Land Tbk (APLN) Pendapatan Berulang .Malls .Hotels .Lainnya .Pengembang terkemuka dan terdiversifikasi .Pionir pengembangan superblock .Model pengembangan property terintegrasi . IPO di tahun 2010 Penjualan .Pengembangan Superblock .Rumah tapak/apartemen .Lainnya 3 Project Locations 4 Lahan untuk pengembangan* (Hektar) Medan; Balikpapan; 4,9 5,2 Greater Jakarta; Batam; 58,2 40,8 Bandung; 1,8 Karawang ; 5,7 Bogor; 91,2 Dalam Pengembangan Pengembangan; 209 Mendatang; 554 Bali; 7,4 Makassar; 15,0 Jakarta; 36,3 Bandung; 120,5 * Tidak termasuk reklamasi Karawang; 374,9 5 Agenda 1. Tentang Perusahaan 2. Kinerja Operasional 3. Kinerja Keuangan 6 Sekilas 2019 . Penjualan Sofitel senilai Rp 1,6 triliun pada Maret 2019. Pelunasan Obligasi Berkelanjutan I APLN Tahap II Tahun 2014 sebesar Rp750 miliar Juni 2019 . -
After the Examination, the Priority for Indicator No.7 Is As Shown in Figure D2-14
The Project for Capacity Development of Wastewater Sector Through Reviewing the Wastewater Management Master Plan in DKI Jakarta After the examination, the priority for Indicator No.7 is as shown in Figure D2-14. Indicator No.7 River water quality is not good (BOD is high). ¯ 01230.5 Kilometers Legend zone 2011Oct v3 Max BOD (SurfaceWaterQuality) mg/L (Zone) 0.0 - 20.0 20.1 - 40.0 40.1 - 60.0 60.1 - 80.0 80.1 - 100.0 Max BOD (SurfaceWaterQuality) mg/L (Kelurahan) 2.0 - 25.0 25.1 - 50.0 50.1 - 75.0 75.1 - 100.0 100.1 - 125.0 River Water Quality by BOD (2011) [Priority for Indicator No.7] Zone No. BOD (Maximum) Rank 1 60 4 2 60 4 3 60 4 4 9 13 5 50 9 6 60 4 7 32 11 8 30 12 9 86 1 10 86 1 11 60 4 12 9 13 13 86 1 14 37 10 0 50 Source: JICA Expert Team Figure D2-14 Priority for Indicator No.7 YEC / JESC / WA JV Final Report (Main Report) D-26 The Project for Capacity Development of Wastewater Sector Through Reviewing the Wastewater Management Master Plan in DKI Jakarta After the examination, the priority for Indicator No.8 is as shown in Figure D2-15. Indicator No.8 Groundwater quality is not good (E-coli is high). ¯ ¯ 03691.5 Kilometers 03691.5 Kilometers Legend Legend zone2011oct_v3 zone2011oct_v3Groundwater Quality (E-Coli) GroundwaterMean Value Quality (10^6) (E-Coli) Mean Value (10^6)0.0 - 400.0 0.0 - 400.0400.1 - 800.0 400.1 - 800.0800.1 - 1200.0 800.1 - 1200.01200.1 - 1600.0 1200.1 - 1600.11600.0 - 2000.0 1600.1Groundwater - 2000.0 Quality (E-Coli) GroundwaterValue (10^6) Quality (E-Coli) Value (10^6) High : 1999.95 High : 1999.95 Low : 1.93 Low : 1.93 Groundwater Quality by E-Coli (2011) [Priority for Indicator No.8] Zone No. -
THE LARGEST Township Development in Jakarta by Ciputra
Propertindo123.comTHE LARGEST | Properti Township Online Development in Jakarta by Ciputra Group Launching Apartment Propertindo123.com | Properti Online Ciputra Grup yang didirikan oleh Alm. Dr. (HC) Ir. Ciputra dan keluarganya pada tahun 1981, adalah salah satu pengembang properti terdiversifikasi paling terkemuka di Indonesia. Selama hampir empat dekade terakhir, Ciputra Group telah memelopori pengembangan berskala besar dan berhasil mengembangkan lebih dari 99 proyek di 33 kota di Indonesia bahkan beberapa negara di Asia. Ciputra Grup mempertahankan posisi terdepan dalam industri dengan memilih lokasi strategis untuk pengembangan perkotaan mandiri yang menggabungkan area perumahan dengan zona komersial, infrastruktur transportasi dan komunikasi, layanan public dan fasilitas. Alm. Dr. (HC) Ir. Ciputra Founders of Ciputra Group Propertindo123.com | Properti Online Propertindo123.comMilestones | Properti Online 1981 1984 – 1996 1997 – 2005 2006 – Present Establishment Growth Restructuring Expansion 1984: CitraGarden City , our first 1997: 2006: 2014: Citra Maja Raya residential project, in West • Century 21, our property broker • Grand Phnom Penh International City, Universitas Ciputra International Jakarta business unit Ciputra, Mall Ciputra Seraya Pekanbaru : CitraGarden City Malang • Citra Harmoni Sidoarjo 2015 Established under : Sedaya Citra Media, our media : CitraLiving Jakarta 1991 • CitraIndah Jonggol 2007 the name of PT business unit • Ciputra World Surabaya, CitraLand City Samarinda • CitraGran Cibubur Citra Towers Kemayoran -
Mode Shift Travel Demand Management Evaluation from Jakarta’S Experience
Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.7, 2009 Mode Shift Travel Demand Management Evaluation From Jakarta’s Experience Muhammad Nanang PRAYUDYANTO Ofyar Z. TAMIN Ph.D Student Professor Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Institute Technology Bandung (ITB) Institute Technology Bandung (ITB) Jl. Ganesha 10 Jl.Ganesha 10 Phone&Fax : 062 - 022 2502350 Phone&Fax : 062 - 022 2502350 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The study is meant to simply evaluate the mode shift TDM operational strategies from selected alternatives, available for metropolitan cities in Indonesia. Jakarta would be selected as sample city, while it has been producing more than 20 million trips every day, concentrating at very small area of 20 km2 out of 656 km2. Development of Busway, School Buses, Jakarta Staggered Working Hours and Road Pricing schemes would be elaborated, comparing with the current vehicle occupancy “3 in 1” policy. Selection of strategies would including transportation, financing and environmental aspects. Key words: TDM, mode shift, congestion. 1. BACKGROUND The influences of motorization and urbanization in Indonesia, later followed by sub- urbanization in many metropolitan areas, have been of interest to transportation and urban researchers for the last few decades (Bappenas-JICA, 2004, Tamin, 2006, Prayudyanto, 2007, Soehodho, 2007, Susilo, 2007). However, most of the studies were based on evidence in developed countries. It is unclear whether the results were also valid in developing countries, since the transportation conditions of both situations are different in many fundamental ways. Sprawling urban growth with a poor public transport network has also supported the trend of motorization among urban residents in developing countries cities in Indonesia, such in Jakarta, Surabaya, Medan, Makassar and Bandung. -
Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta
GUBERNUR PROVINSI DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA JAKARTA KEPUTUSAN GUBERNUR PROVINSI DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA JAKARTA NOMOR 1861 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG PENETAPAN LOKASI UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN NORMALISASI KALIPESANGGRAHAN DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA GUBERNUR PROVINSI DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA JAKARTA, Menimbang a. bahwa berdasarkan Peraturan Gubemur Nomor 142 Tahun 2012 sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan Gubernur Nomor 0106 Tahun 2013 telah ditetapkan penguasaan perencanaan/ peruntukan bidang tanah bagi pelaksanaan pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum rencana trace Normalisasl Kali Pesanggrahan; b. bahwa pelaksanaan Peraturan Gubernur sebagaimana dimaksud dalam huruf a masih terdapat sisa tanah yang belum selesai diproses pengadaannya sampai dengan jangka waktu berlaku Peraturan Gubernur dimaksud berakhir, sehingga untuk kelanjutan pelaksanaan normalisasi kali dimaksud, perlu memperbaharui penetapan lokasinya; c. bahwa berdasarkan pertimbangan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam huruf a dan liuruf b, perlu menetapkan Keputusan Gubernur tentang Penetapan Lokasi Untuk Pembangunan Normalisasi Kali Pesanggrahan; Mengingat I. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria; 2. Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Prp Tahun 1960 tentang Larangan Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin yang Berhak atau Kuasanya; 3. Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang; 4. Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2007 tentang Pemerintahan Provinsl Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta sebagai Ibukota °Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia; 5. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan; 6. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi 'Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum; 7. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah sebagaimana telah beberapa kali dlUbah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015; r 2 8. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2008 tentang Penataan Ruang Kawasan Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi, Puncak, Cianjur; 9. -
EEB Laboratory Jakarta Energy Efficiency in Buildings Project Leaders in Jakarta
EEB Laboratory Jakarta Energy Efficiency in Buildings Project leaders in Jakarta Partners of the EEB lab Jakarta Lafarge Indonesia UNEP SBCI WBCSD GBC Indonesia UNEP (Bangkok) IBCSD ICLEI MASKEEI BPPT (research institution) Universitas Indonesia Real Estate Indonesia (REI) ENGIE NaramaMandiri BOMA Indonesia Synergy Efficiency Solutions About the WBCSD About GBC Indonesia About IBCSD The World Business Council for Green Building Council Indonesia The Indonesia Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), (GBC Indonesia) is an independent, Sustainable Development (IBCSD) is a CEO-led organization of some 200 not-for-profit organization established a CEO-led association of companies forward-thinking global companies, in 2009 by professionals in design operating in Indonesia, who share a is committed to galvanizing the and construction industry who are commitment to promoting sustainable global business community to create concerned about green building development through sustainable a sustainable future for business, practices. The main focus of GBC economic growth, ecological balance society and the environment. Together Indonesia is to pursue the socialization and social progress. The launch of with its members, the council applies and transformation of sustainable this business council in April 2011 its respected thought leadership green principles, particularly in building represents a new regional chapter and effective advocacy to generate construction industry in Indonesia. of the World Business Council for constructive solutions and take In organizing its activities, GBC Sustainable Development (WBCSD). shared action. Leveraging its strong Indonesia collaborates with all building Founder members of IBCSD include 6 relationships with stakeholders as stakeholders, including professional, prominent Indonesian companies. the leading advocate for business, government and private sectors. -
No. Kecamatan Kelurahan Jumlah Nilai Kepuasan 1 CENGKARENG RAWA BUAYA 434 92.40 KAPUK 376 87.15 DURI KOSAMBI 111 86.46 CENGKAREN
Nilai SKM dan Jumlah Responden Perkecamatan-Kelurahan untuk pelayanan Ketertiban Umum Tahun 2020 Nilai No. Kecamatan Kelurahan Jumlah Kepuasan 1 CENGKARENG RAWA BUAYA 434 92.40 KAPUK 376 87.15 DURI KOSAMBI 111 86.46 CENGKARENG BARAT 192 86.24 KEDAUNG KALIANGKE 196 86.00 CENGKARENG TIMUR 312 83.85 CENGKARENG Total 1621 87.63 2 GROGOL PETAMBURAN TANJUNG DUREN SELATAN 126 99.18 JELAMBAR BARU 354 89.30 TANJUNG DUREN UTARA 293 88.26 JELAMBAR 202 88.15 WIJAYA KUSUMA 370 88.06 GROGOL 189 87.29 TOMANG 358 86.75 GROGOL PETAMBURAN Total 1892 88.75 3 KALIDERES KAMAL 146 94.63 PEGADUNGAN 400 87.74 SEMANAN 324 87.32 TEGAL ALUR 362 86.51 KALIDERES 373 85.17 KALIDERES Total 1605 87.41 4 KEBON JERUK KEDOYA UTARA 108 93.54 KELAPA DUA 118 90.73 SUKABUMI UTARA 333 88.71 SUKABUMI SELATAN 292 86.81 KEDOYA SELATAN 318 86.40 KEBON JERUK 180 86.34 DURI KEPA 340 81.47 KEBON JERUK Total 1689 86.69 5 KEMBANGAN KEMBANGAN UTARA 139 94.70 KEMBANGAN SELATAN 117 92.47 SRENGSENG 124 90.23 JOGLO 164 88.77 MERUYA UTARA 208 88.43 MERUYA SELATAN 303 86.21 KEMBANGAN Total 1055 89.33 6 PALMERAH SLIPI 160 92.43 KOTA BAMBU SELATAN 405 91.02 JATI PULO 126 87.65 KOTA BAMBU UTARA 287 85.29 PAL MERAH 527 83.89 KEMANGGISAN 224 83.56 PALMERAH Total 1729 86.81 Nilai No. Kecamatan Kelurahan Jumlah Kepuasan 7 TAMANSARI GLODOK 105 90.77 TANGKI 112 89.88 KRUKUT 135 89.07 PINANGSIA 122 87.34 TAMAN SARI 126 87.06 KEAGUNGAN 233 86.97 MANGGA BESAR 234 86.67 MAHPAR 193 85.48 TAMANSARI Total 1260 87.53 8 TAMBORA DURI SELATAN 129 98.77 DURI UTARA 214 96.78 ROA MALAKA 110 93.03 TAMBORA 204 92.37 TANAH SEREAL 396 91.42 KALI ANYAR 382 87.94 KRENDANG 415 87.04 JEMBATAN LIMA 196 86.39 ANGKE 308 83.58 JEMBATAN BESI 220 82.50 PEKOJAN 239 81.00 TAMBORA Total 2813 88.39 Nilai SKM dan Jumlah Responden Perkecamatan-Kelurahan untuk pelayanan PPSU Tahun 2020 Nilai No. -
Agung Podomoro Land
Indonesia Company Guide Agung Podomoro Land Version 2 | Bloomberg : APLN IJ | Reuters: APLN.JK Refer to important disclosures at the end of this report DBS Group Research . Equity 7 Jun 2016 FULLY VALUED Laying low for now Last Traded Price: Rp244 (JCIJCIJCIJCI : 4,896.03) Price Target : Rp205 (-16% downside) (Prev Rp285) Maintain FULLY VALUED call. We adjusted our RNAV Potential Catalyst: More significant project acquisitions downwards to Rp502/sh to reflect latest revenue recognition Where we differdiffer:::: Having the most bearish estimates and earning estimates given the latest development of APLN’s Analyst existing and new projects. Subsequently, our TP is adjusted to Edward Ariadi Tanuwijaya +6221 3003 4932 Rp205 (implying c.19% downside from current level). [email protected] What’s New Reclamation project status remains uncleaunclearrrr.. The development of APLN’s major projects remain uncertain with all the swirling • New revenue stream from PGV Cimanggis project news on the 160-ha Pluit City reclamation project. APLN, • Reclamation project remains unclear given the known for its fast turnover business model, has to seek other latest development (and administrative court projects to maintain its earnings continuity and sustainability. order) • Balance sheet will continue to be highly geared New segment provides fresh revenue streamstream.. APLN recently groundbroke its new project Podomoro Golf View (PGV) • Maintain FULLY VALUED call Cimanggis in south Jakarta suburb area. The company, through its subsidiary PT. Graha Tunas Selaras, plans to build 25 apartment towers (i.e. 37,000 apartment units) on this 60- Price Relative ha project. This PGV project offers 20-30 sqm units with price Rp Relative Index per unit ranging between Rp198m and Rp470m. -
Buku Shalat Di Mall (JIC-2018)
- 1 - - 2 - SHALAT DI MALL KAJIAN KEBERADAAN MASJID & MUSHOLA DI PUSAT PERBELANJAAN JAKARTA - 3 - SHALAT DI MALL KAJIAN KEBERADAAN MASJID & MUSHOLA DI PUSAT PERBELANJAAN JAKARTA JAKARTA ISLAMIC CENTRE Alamat : Jalan Kramat Jaya, Koja, Jakarta Utara Jakarta, Indonesia 14260 Telp: 021-4413069 Fax: 021-44835349 Website : http://islamic-center.or.id Editor : Haerullah, M.Si. Moh. Hasyim, MMA Masad Masrur, M.IP. Riset : Tim Kajian JIC - Haerullah, M.Si. - Moh. Hasyim, MMA. - Masad Masrur, M.IP. - Arief Rahman Hakim, M.Si - Rina Uswatun Hasanah S.Sos. - Juhadi - Ernawati, S.Pd. - Ivan Herlambang - Hanny Fitriyah, S.Ag. - Darmi A.R., S.Ag. - Humi Nasita D., S.E. - Muchtar - Andrian, S.T. - Niswati Fatimah, S.IP. - Desmawati, SE. - Farid Broto Susatyo, ST. Foto : Kiki Hambali, Haerullah Lay Out : Paimun Cover : Arif & Paimun Hak cipta dilindungi undang-undang Dilarang mengutip atau memperbanyak sebagian atau seluruh isi buku ini tanpa izin tertulis dari penerbit Cetakan kedua, 12 November 2018 - 4 - Pengantar Kepala Badan Manajemen PPPIJ Alhamdulillahirabbil’alamin. Saya amat bersyukur, buku ini dapat diterbitkan sebagai wujud peran penting Jakarta Islamic Centre dalam mengkaji aspek-aspek kehidupan masyarakat yang sangat erat hubungannya dengan aspek ibadah dan keagamaan. Selain itu. Kajian ini juga berharap dapat ditingkatkan dan ditindaklanjuti oleh Pemda Provinsi DKI Jakarta menjadi sebuah produk hukum yang mengatur tata kelola tempat ibadah di ruang publik, khususnya di tempat perbelanjaan. Masjid dan pasar sesungguhnya adalah ruang ibadah yang luas, keduanya sesungguhnya dapat saling menyeimbangkan. Mall sebagai tempat yang “multi fungsi” saat ini memang telah mampu menggeser masjid sebagai tempat yang sesungguhnya juga memiliki banyak fungsi. Namun demikian, ketika mall memberikan ruangnya untuk kegiatan ibadah, mestinya hal ini dianggap sebagai upaya untuk “menyatukan” peran mall dan fungsi masjid. -
Townland Consultants
EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS IN INDONESIA Project TCL Project Description Client Lead Duration Completed Ref. Consultant of Project (year) (months) Master Planning for IP9 TOWNLAND was commissioned to PT. Sumber TOWNLAND 1997 Town Centre undertake the Master Planning of an Mitrarealtindo Development (43 ha) in Innovative Commercial Mixed-Use Complex Kelapa Gading on a 43 ha Site. Post Evaluation of the IP10 Post-Evaluation of a Master Layout Plan for PT. Sumber TOWNLAND 1997 Master Layout Plan and Mitra Gading Apartments and preparation Mitrarealtindo Preparation of a of an alternative Concept Plan for a 12 Concept Plan for storey residential development on a 7 ha Residential Site. Development (7 ha) at Kelapa Gading, Jakarta Urban Design and IP13 TOWNLAND was commissioned to PT. Bakrieland TOWNLAND 1999 Coordination of Master undertake the Urban Design and Master Development, Planning for a 200 ha Planning for the Project, comprising a 200 Tbk New Town Development ha Site about 100 km from Jakarta. The New in Purwakarta Town comprises predominantly residential uses and supporting facilities. Future development includes a business park and a tertiary education facility. Landscape Design for IP4/4 TOWNLAND prepared an Innovative Golf PT. Pulo Mas TOWNLAND 2 2000 Golf Courts Proposal, Court Concept and Framework Landscaping Jaya Pulo Mas, East Jakarta to Golf Court, Driving Range and Ancillary Facilities. Master Layout Planning IP21 TOWNLAND prepared the Master Layout PT. Waringin TOWNLAND 5 2000 for Warehouse and Plan for a 13.5 ha Site within the 100 ha Pluit Multicipta Commercial District Distribution Centre in Northwest Jakarta. Master Plan (13.5 ha) in Uses include light industrial, warehousing Kapuk Kamal Raya, and supporting commercial facilities.