DOCSLIB.ORG

Anaconda Downtown Master Plan Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anaconda Downtown Master Plan Final DOWNTOWN ANACONDA MASTER PLAN ADOPTED March 15, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: INTRODUCTION……………………………………...1 5: GUIDING PRINCIPLES………………………..…….43 Plan Purpose Public Involvement Vison Statement 2: BACKGROUND……………………………………….5 Guiding Principles The Case for Revitalization Energy Conservation Lessons Learned Downtown Vision Plan Case Studies Plan Framework 6: THE DOWNTOWN PLAN………………………….47 Main Street Approach Economic Revitalization Previous Plans Business support strategies Public Input Redevelopment strategies Plan Organization Addressing decay Project Area Historic Resources Identity and Design 3: OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS………………….19 Transportation Land Use Circulation Historic Resources Complete streets Business Development Pedestrian Safety Housing Tax Increment Financing Identity and Design Organization Transportation and Parking Promotion Tourism Organization 7: ACTION PLAN……………………………………...63 Summary of Recommendations 4: MARKET ASSESSMENT………………………………35 Regulatory Population Trends Design Employment Trends Organization Housing Trends Promotion Retail Trade Analysis Opportunities APPENDIX……………………………………………….67 ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Downtown Master Plan was made possible by the contributions and cooperative input from numerous citizen participants, local stakeholders, staff members, and elected and appointed officials. The project team thanks all those that participated, including the following: Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Commission Anaconda Local Development Corporation Terry Vermeire, District 1 Jim Davison Patricia Mulvey, District 2 Charly Loper Kevin Hart, District 3 Paul Smith, District 4 Master Plan Prepared by: Elaine Lux-Burt, District 5 Sanderson Stewart Lauren Waterton Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Planning Board David Groshens Adam Vauthier, Chair Danielle Scharf Jay Slocum, Vice-Chair Megan Terry Rick Hamilton Philip Maechling Jason McDonald Paul Polzin Mary Kae Massey Mary Murphy Audrey Aspholm Vince Labbe Annette Smith ii ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN 1: INTRODUCTION 1: INTRODUCTION PLAN PURPOSE In June 2015, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County and Anaconda Local Development Corporation initiated a planning process with the local community to undertake the development of a Downtown Master Plan. Sanderson Stewart was engaged to help prepare the Downtown Master Plan and facilitate a public engagement process. Step 1: INITIATION The primary purpose of the Master Plan is Begins the project by aligning expectations, establishing goals, and developing a path for the to articulate the long-term vision and set planning project. practical, achievable strategies for improving Downtown’s appearance and Step 2: ANALYSIS economic vitality. The Downtown Master Involves the analysis of data, including previous planning studies, current economic and Plan also builds on past and current demographic data, and site observations. revitalization efforts undertaken by Anaconda Deer-Lodge County (ADLC) and Step 3: VISION Anaconda Local Development Corporation Focuses on early development of planning scenarios that holistically address the downtown’s (ALDC). development. Step 4: PLAN DEVELOPMENT Refine the vision, evaluation of options and input from stakeholders. Step 5: REFINEMENT Includes preparation of the final composite plan and relate supporting documents. Step 6: FINAL PLAN Includes public review and final approval by the County Commission. ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN 1 The Master Plan provides an opportunity to • Preserving architectural integrity of • Evaluating and recommending a address the following: the Anaconda’s Commercial Area framework for regulatory changes National Register Historic District. that promote appropriate land use, • Long-term planning for the economic vitality for Downtown reuse of historic structures and Anaconda. • Improving Downtown’s urban addresses community decay. design and physical environment through streetscape improvements, • Increasing the tax base through evaluation of the economic market landscape treatments and signage. overview and profile summary. • Promoting healthy communities. • Developing a strategy that prioritizes the reuse of existing buildings while diversifying uses to include an appropriate mix of commercial, residential and institutional uses. • Supporting and growing the tourism economy. • Promoting equitable, affordable housing. • Assessing transportation and parking issues with a focus on 2: Improving pedestrian and bicycle safety creates improving pedestrian and bicyclist greater travel options for residents safety. 1: Residences along Commercial Avenue 2 ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN • Encouraging sustainability by • Developing implementation • Creating a Master Plan that becomes exploring methods for promoting strategies that prioritizes projects a guidebook for policy for ADLC energy efficiency, sustainable design and actions, outlines roles and and the community for how features in streetscape and other responsibilities between Downtown Anaconda revitalizes public spaces. organizations and agencies and and redevelops over time. identifies other stakeholders that • Identifying funding strategies, should participate. including revenues within the Tax Increment Finance District created in 2014. ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN 3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4 ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN 2: BACKGROUND 2: BACKGROUND The Case for Revitalization Additionally, studies conducted by the and methods communities use to achieve National Trust for Historic Preservation revitalization goals vary, but successful Community revitalization is defined as a and state preservation agencies demonstrate outcomes rely on seven basis principles: process that citizens undertake to energize a that preservation of historic resources can 1. Community development is community and build economic value. It is a create jobs, generate revenue and improve process to improve infrastructure, expand community quality. economic development. employment opportunities, and provide a Development of community resources healthy environment for its citizens. Downtowns reflect a vast amount of public including leadership training, youth and private investment. When communities entrepreneurship and support of Rural communities often struggle with invest in the maintenance and upkeep of community through philanthropy population decline, loss of employment, public improvements, it encourages and enhances typical economic development failing infrastructure and deteriorating leverages private investment. In Colorado, projects. buildings. Community revitalization is the communities that invest in downtown process to confront those issues and turn infrastructure saw four times the amount of 2. Activities should be future oriented, losses into opportunities. private investment in those same embrace change and accept risk. downtowns (Colorado Main Street When communities actively work to Communities that prepare for the next Program, 2014 Annual Report). revitalize, the effects are felt throughout the opportunity, or create it themselves, see community. A revitalized downtown Lessons Learned greater results than communities waiting provides benefits beyond the commercial for opportunities to come to them. area. According to a study completed by the In building a plan for revitalizing Sonoran Institute in 2012 (“About Town”), Anaconda’s downtown, it is helpful to 3. Broadly held local vision guides downtowns provide greater value in tax evaluate programs from other communities. strategies. Local organizations are vital revenues as compared to a strip mall The University of North Carolina’s Rural to holding regular conversations development or big box retail store. When Economic Development Center studied 50 regarding revitalization and creating a comparing development in terms of acres, small towns throughout the United States. vision for a community’s future. downtown properties contribute five times Their evaluation of these towns highlighted the property tax revenue as single-use in the publication, Small Towns, Big Ideas: commercial establishments. Case Studies in Small Town Community Economic Development, demonstrate that the process ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN 5 4. Innovation in government, The City of Bozeman, institutions and partnerships Montana is enhance community capacity. Small undergoing parking towns often lack resources to fully lot improvements in address community issues. Creating downtown. By partnerships and alliances to address improving the public issues allows for greater success. spaces, cities enhance the visitor 5. Short-term success should be experience. identified and celebrated in order to build support for long-term activities. However small, celebrating success builds support and enthusiasm for future activities. 3: Bozeman parking lot current condition 6. Define assets and opportunities broadly. Rural communities tend to have limited resources. Providing a broader framework will allow exploration of greater opportunity. 7. There is no silver bullet. No single strategy worked for every community. Successful redevelopment is always multifaceted and occurs over time. Case Studies The following examples highlight the process and tactics that define community revitalization. 4: Envisioned Bozeman parking lot design 6 ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN ANACONDA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN Montana Avenue, Billings, MT is considered the shifting point in Montana Montana Avenue revitalization Avenue’s revitalization. highlights: Established as a railroad
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Butte-Anaconda Historic District NHL Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 BUTTE-ANACONDA HISTORIC DISTRICT Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Butte-Anaconda Historic District (Revised documentation) Other Name/Site Number: Butte Historic District NHL Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Historic District Headframes and Mine Yards in Butte Socialist Hall, Butte Anaconda Commercial Historic District Anaconda Goosetown Historic District Anaconda West Side Historic District Anaconda Mining Company Smoke Stack Tuttle Manufacturing and Supply Company 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Not For Publication: N/A Vicinity: N/A City/Town: Walkerville, Butte and Anaconda State: Montana Counties: Silver Bow and Deer Lodge Code: 093, 023 Zip Code: 59701, 59711 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property: Category of Property: Public: X Building(s): ___ Private/Local: X District: X State: X Site: ___ Public-Federal: X Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 5952 1872 building(s) 2 1 sites 36 21 structures 1 0 objects 5991 1894 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: N/A (Contributing resources were not formally tallied in earlier Butte NHL listings) Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 BUTTE-ANACONDA HISTORIC DISTRICT Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiggins Theater Clark County, Washington
    NPS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet – KIGGINS THEATER CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON Section number 8 Page 1of 13 Statement of Significance The Kiggins Theater, located on Main Street in Vancouver’s City Center, is eligible for listing to the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C (The property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction). The Theater is Vancouver’s, and Southwest Washington’s, finest example of art deco and streamlined moderne architecture. The period of significance is 1936, when the theater opened. Art deco is known primarily for its use of early modern ornamentation. The Streamline Moderne movement is similarly associated with early modernism, but is known for a less decorative approach than art deco, emphasizing instead smooth lines, bands and courses, and a more machine-like approach but with a continued emphasis on aesthetics. Prime examples of art deco design include William Van Alan’s 1924 Chrysler Building, which is topped by concentric bands with radial features, creating a beautiful repetition of form, much like can be seen with the bands of cast concrete which wrap the upper story of the Kiggins theater and which divide, like pilasters, the store-front bays and theater on the western façade. Another fine example of the smooth lines emphasized in these styles is evident in the famous Odoen Theater in London England.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaconda-Deer Lodge County DRAFT
    Anaconda-Deer Lodge County DRAFT Anaconda-Deer Lodge County STATEState OF THE of COUNTY the | CountyDRAFT Report | Draft | February 2021 1 DRAFT 2 DRAFT 3 Acknowledgments Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Planning Consultant Historic Resources Board The Lakota Group Bob Wren Gayla Hess, Historic Preservation Officer Henry Lussy Mary Lynn McKenna Vacant (2 positions) All photos by The Lakota Group unless otherwise noted. Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Commission Funding Terry Vermeire, District 1 Commissioner This Historic Preservation Plan was made Steve Gates, District 2 Commissioner possible by a grant from the Montana Kevin Hart, District 3 Commissioner Department of Commerce’s Montana Paul Smith, District 4 Commissioner Main Street Program in support the local Mike Huotte, District 5 Commissioner planning, economic development, urban revitalization, and historic preservation County Administration projects. The Montana Main Street Program assists communities in revitalizing and Bill T. Everett, Chief Executive Officer strengthening downtown commercial districts, while also offering technical Anaconda Local Development assistance, expertise and competitive Corporation Board of Directors grant funding to its member communities. Anaconda-Deer Lodge County is a Bekah Esquibel participating community in the Montana J. Ben Everett Main Street program. The contents and Mike Hale opinions of this Historic Preservation Mikal Harpster Plan do not necessarily reflect the views Steve Hill or policies of the Montana Main Street Tricia Hoiland Program or the Montana Department of Kim Jones Commerce. In addition, the Anaconda-Deer Abby Kovacich DRAFTLodge County Historic Resources Board Ben Krakowka and the Deer Lodge County Urban Renew Wyatt Larson Agency (URA) Tax Increment Financing Kaitlin Leary Grant program provided matching funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 1, 1983 / Notices 8621
    Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 1, 1983 / Notices 8621 UNITED STATES INFORMATION 2. The authority to redelegate the VETERANS ADMINISTRATION AGENCY authority granted herein together with the power of further redelegation. Voluntary Service National Advisory [Delegation Order No. 83-6] Texts of all such advertisements, Committee; Renewal notices, and proposals shall be This is to give notice in accordance Delegation of Authority; To the submitted to the Office of General Associate Director for Management with the Federal Advisory Committee Counsel for review and approval prior Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6,1972, Pursuant to the authority vested in me to publication. that the Veterans Administration as Director of the United States Notwithstanding any other provision Voluntary Service National Advisory Information Agency by Reorganization of this Order, the Director may at any Committee has been renewed by the Plan No. 2 of 1977, section 303 of Pub. L. time exercise any function or authority Administrator of Veterans Affairs for a 97-241, and section 302 of title 5, United delegated herein. two-year period beginning February 7, States Code, there is hereby delegated This Order is effective as of February 1983 through February 7,1985. 8,1983. to the Associate Director for Dated: February 15,1983. Management the following described Dated: February 16,1983. By direction of the Administrator. authority: Charles Z. Wick, Rosa Maria Fontanez, 1. The authority vested in the Director Director, United States Information Agency. by section 3702 of title 44, United States Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 83-5171 Filed 2-28-83; 8:45 am] Code, to authorize the publication of [FR Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaconda-Deer Lodge County
    Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Anaconda-Deer Lodge County STATEState OF THE of COUNTY the | CountyDRAFT Report | Draft | February 2021 1 2 3 Acknowledgments Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Planning Consultant Historic Resources Board The Lakota Group Bob Wren Gayla Hess, Historic Preservation Officer Henry Lussy Mary Lynn McKenna Vacant (2 positions) All photos by The Lakota Group unless otherwise noted. Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Commission Funding Terry Vermeire, District 1 Commissioner This Historic Preservation Plan was made Steve Gates, District 2 Commissioner possible by a grant from the Montana Kevin Hart, District 3 Commissioner Department of Commerce’s Montana Paul Smith, District 4 Commissioner Main Street Program in support the local Mike Huotte, District 5 Commissioner planning, economic development, urban revitalization, and historic preservation County Administration projects. The Montana Main Street Program assists communities in revitalizing and Bill T. Everett, Chief Executive Officer strengthening downtown commercial districts, while also offering technical Anaconda Local Development assistance, expertise and competitive Corporation Board of Directors grant funding to its member communities. Anaconda-Deer Lodge County is a Bekah Esquibel participating community in the Montana J. Ben Everett Main Street program. The contents and Mike Hale opinions of this Historic Preservation Mikal Harpster Plan do not necessarily reflect the views Steve Hill or policies of the Montana Main Street Tricia Hoiland Program or the Montana Department of Kim Jones Commerce. In addition, the Anaconda-Deer Abby Kovacich Lodge County Historic Resources Board Ben Krakowka and the Deer Lodge County Urban Renew Wyatt Larson Agency (URA) Tax Increment Financing Kaitlin Leary Grant program provided matching funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Washoe-NRHP-Nominati
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department off the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries — complete applicable sections ________________ 1. Name__________________ historic Washoe Theater ____________________________ and/or common Washoe Theater ________________________ 2. Location street & number 305 Main N/A not for publication city, town Anaconda N/A vicinity of congressional district Montana First state Montana code 030 county Deer Lodge code 023 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum x building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible _ X- entertainment religious object in process _X _ yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation N/A no military others 4. Owner of Property name___Henry Lussy street & number 1818 Tammany Avenue city, town Anaconda N/A vicinity of state Montana 59711 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Deer Lodge County Courthouse street & number Anaconda city, town state Montana 59711 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title N/A has this property been determined elegible? __ yes _X_ no date federal __ state __ county __ local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent deteriorated X unaltered _ X- original site qood ruins altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Washoe Theater occupies a large portion of the 300 block on Main Street in Anaconda.
    [Show full text]
  • Yaj/98 Y£ Signature of Fene Keeper Date of Action
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ——— Page ——— SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 98000396 Date Listed: 4/28/98 West Side Historic District Deer Lodge MT Property Name County State Historic & Architectural Properties of Anaconda r Montana MPS Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. yAj/98 y£ Signature of fene Keeper Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Significance: Criteria Consideration A&B are deleted from the nomination. [In neither case do the resources constitute a majority or predominant aspect of the historic district. In such cases the considerations do not need to be checked.] The level of significance documented by the MPS context and nomination is Local. Description: The Resource Count is revised to move 12 buildings from contributing to noncontributing status. This reflects several subsidiary garages that according to the building inventory dated from after the period of significance (post-1936) but were nonetheless incorrectly designated as contributing. [218, 506, 523, 610, 707 Hickory; 410 Locust; 712, 709, 800 Main; 216, 507 Maple; 411 West Third.] This information was confirmed with Lon Johnson of the MT SHPO. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Assessment of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest
    Social Assessment of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Prepared for the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest January 2003 Prepared by In association with 880 H STREET, SUITE 210, ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 T: 907.274.5600 F: 907.274.5601 E: [email protected] www.northerneconomics.com Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................................................................. ES-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. ES-1 Socioeconomic Background.......................................................................................................... ES-2 Demography ................................................................................................................................. ES2 Economy ..................................................................................................................................... ES-8 The Social and Cultural Context.................................................................................................. ES-14 Community Resiliency Summaries .............................................................................................. ES-15 Forest Management Concerns..................................................................................................... ES-23 Trends and Issues ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Team Assessment Report
    RESOURCE TEAM ASSESSMENT REPORT for ANACONDA, MONTANA OCTOBER 4 - 5, 2006 In Partnership with your Certified Regional Development Corporation: Headwaters RC& D; Anaconda Main Street, Montana Department of Commerce; Montana Economic Developers Association; Montana USDA/Rural Development; Montana Community Foundation, Applied Communications, Snowy Mountain Development and the people of Anaconda. Anaconda Resource Team Assessment 1 October 4 - 5, 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It was a privilege for the Anaconda Resource Team to spend two days in your community. Thank you for your hospitality, your time, and for sharing with the team the vision you have for Anaconda. Before digging in to the report itself, I would like to give recognition to the Certified Regional Development Corporation program that is funded through Montana Department of Commerce (MDOC). Headwaters RC& D, under the direction of Judie Tilman, is the Certified Regional Development Corporation for the community of Anaconda which made this assessment possible. In addition, support and training for the process is provided by Montana Economic Developers Association (MEDA). These three partnerships make Resource Team’s possible. Special thanks are also due to the Anaconda Main Street office. Betsy Pahut and Rose Nyman served as the champions behind this entire project and will continue to be involved with the project through activities detailed in this report. Bestsy and Rose had help from a host of other people, agencies and businesses, but without their “Let’s do it” energy, the assessment would not have taken place. In addition, I applaud each and every team member that dedicated hours of work and travel in order to participate on the team: Victor Bjornberg, Montana Department of Commerce Tourism Development Coordinator; Frank Kromkowski, Montana Department of Commerce Community Development Block Grant Program Specialist; Cathy Cooney, Program Director, Montana Community Foundation; Cindy Donnell, Area Director, Montana USDA/Rural Development and Kate McMahon of Applied Communications in Whitefish.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Travel Planner the Pups
    EXPERIENCE MONTANA’s MOST REMARKABLE TOWNS From culturally rich cities to Old West ghost towns PLAY WITH THE PUPS Outdoor adventures your kids will never forget 2015 TRAVEL PLANNER southwestmt.com I 800-879-1159 2 Missouri River (Jason Savage) Virginia City (Chuck Haney) SOUTHWESTMT.COM Powwow (Lisa Wareham) SOUTHWEST MONTANAWhen you think of Montana, do you picture skyscraping ranges of snowcapped rock? A cowboy tipping his hat to greet you as he passes by on a boardwalk? Herds of elk under a sky so wide it seems to swallow you up? Then you’re picturing Southwest Montana. Hemmed by the snow-crowned peaks of Glacier National Park to the north and the geological marvels of Yellowstone National Park to the south, this vast region holds the best of what Montana is about. Here you’ll find a treasure trove of friendly, lively communities and intriguing 19th- century ghost towns. You’ll meet a diverse mix of friendly people and have opportunities to glimpse the same wildlife Lewis and Clark encountered more than two centuries ago. When you’re done exploring for the day, you’ll find gems of places to rest your head — from campsites along crystal streams to lavish Western resorts. Rexford Yaak Eureka Westby GLACIER Whitetail Babb Sweetgrass Four Flaxville Welcome to Southwest Montana. NATIONAL Opheim Buttes Fortine Polebridge Sunburst Turner Trego St. Mary PARK Loring Whitewater Peerless Scobey Plentywood Lake Cut Bank Troy Apgar McDonald We’re glad to have you. Browning Chinook Medicine Lake Libby West Glacier Columbia Shelby Falls Coram Rudyard
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Submission Historic and Architectural Properties
    NFS Form 10-9OO-b (Jan. 1991) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service X New Submission _ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic and Architectural Properties of Anaconda, Montana B. Associated Historic Contexts Early Settlement and Community Development, 1883-1920 Transportation, 1890-1951 Ethnic Heritage, 1883-1945 Community Planning and Development, 1883-1945 Development of Commerce and Industry, 1883-1945 Smelting Industry, 1883-1945 Labor Relations, 1883-1945 Architect-designed Buildings 1883-1945 Influence of Federal Government, 1899-1982 Social and Cultural Development, 1883-1945 Movement of Buildings, 1883-1945 C. Form Prepared By Name/Title: Kimberly Currie Morrison Organization: Montana State Historic Preservation Office Date: December, 1995 Street & Number: 1410 Eighth Avenue, P.O. Box 201202 Telephone: (406)444-7715 City or Town: Helena State: Montana Zip: 59620-1202 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission rements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeology and Historic e continuation sheet fiftr additional comments.) Signature of certifying official Date MONTANA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE_____________ State or Federal agency and bureau______________________________________ I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. Signature of the Keeper of }fjayonal Register I/ NPS Form 10-900-a 0MB Approval No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post and Lintel, Winter 2015
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Post & Lintel Preservation Eastern Winter 2015 The oP st and Lintel, Winter 2015 Preservation Eastern Eastern Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/postlintel Recommended Citation Preservation Eastern, "The osP t and Lintel, Winter 2015" (2015). Post & Lintel. 53. http://commons.emich.edu/postlintel/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Preservation Eastern at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Post & Lintel by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WINTER 2015 ISSUE PRESERVATION EASTERN, 2014-2015 THE POST AND LINTEL WINTER 2015 ISSUE “ Architecture has been called the art of building beautifully, a fixation of man’s thinking, and record of his activity… Keep in mind that last phrase. It is important. ” -Ernst Johnson, architect, professor, colleague of Eero Saarinen CONTENTS Letter from the Director Dr. Ted’s Corner PE General Information FEATURES The Washoe Theater Anaconda, Montana Janell Keyser PE with Ypsilanti Habitat for Humanity (January 24, 2015) In Her Shoes: Exhibit Blog Excerpts Samantha Malott Camp Muir Preservation Site Report Chelsea Sturza Art and the Landscape Matthew Wagner Historic Preservation students Masonry Workshop Photograph courtesy of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Union, Local 2 of Michigan (May 13, 2015) 1 Winter 2015 Issue Letter from the Director Mallory Bower, 2014-2015 Preservation Eastern Board Hello Dear Reader! The Preservation Eastern Board is pleased to present the Winter 2015 Post and Lintel. As always, our members produced several interesting and diverse articles for your enjoyment.
    [Show full text]