Security Sector Reform in Ukraine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Security Sector Reform in Ukraine Security Sector Reform in Ukraine Olga Oliker, Lynn E. Davis, Keith Crane, Andrew Radin, Celeste Ward Gventer, Susanne Sondergaard, James T. Quinlivan, Stephan B. Seabrook, Jacopo Bellasio, Bryan Frederick, Andriy Bega, Jakub Hlavka C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1475-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9597-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Ukrainian soldiers march on Independence Square in downtown Kiev (photo by Danil Shamkin/NurPhoto via AP Images). Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report provides a series of recommendations for the reform of Ukraine’s security and defense institutions. This research was under- taken in response to a request by the presidential administration of Ukraine and in participation with the National Security and Defense Council and sponsored by Ukraine Investment Alliance, a 501(c)(4) foundation. Research for this report was completed in the fall of 2015. Although some minor updates have been made, the analysis predomi- nantly reflects the situation as of that time. This report should be of interest to those in Ukraine who are engaged in security sector reform and those in the international com- munity supporting such reform in Ukraine. This report can also be useful to those interested in assisting with security sector reform in other countries. The research was conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD). NSRD conducts research and analysis on defense and national security topics for the U.S. and allied defense, foreign policy, homeland security, and intelligence communities and founda- tions and other nongovernmental organizations that support defense and national security analysis. For more information on the International Security and Defense Policy Center, see www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/isdp or contact the director (contact information is provided on the web page). iii Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures and Tables ...............................................................vii Summary .......................................................................... ix CHAPTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Approach ............................................................................ 2 CHAPTER TWO Reforming the Security Sector—Overall Architecture .................... 5 Clarify Roles and Responsibilities ............................................... 7 Strengthen Coordination Among Ministries and Agencies .................. 9 Improve Intelligence Coordination .............................................11 Align Roles and Functions of Internal Security Organizations .............13 CHAPTER THREE Organizing for Defense .........................................................21 Structure of Defense Institutions................................................21 Implementation of Defense Structural Recommendations ................. 38 CHAPTER FOUR Defense Reforms to Improve Warfighting and Efficient Use of Resources .....................................................................41 Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence ................... 42 Personnel, Recruiting, and Training ............................................47 Procurement .......................................................................57 Logistics ........................................................................... 64 v vi Security Sector Reform in Ukraine CHAPTER FIVE Cybersecurity .....................................................................71 National Cybersecurity Strategy and Concept ................................71 Cybersecurity and Defense Organizational Structure ........................73 Critical National Infrastructure Protection ....................................75 Incident Response .................................................................78 Military Cyber Defense and Cybersecurity ................................... 80 CHAPTER SIX Defense-Technical Cooperation with Global Partners ...................85 Addressing Source Country Concerns ........................................ 86 Impediments to Defense-Technical Cooperation in Ukraine ............... 88 Recommendations to Address the Challenges to Defense-Technical Cooperation ..................................................................95 CHAPTER SEVEN Conclusions ..................................................................... 103 Acknowledgments ............................................................. 107 Abbreviations ................................................................... 109 Bibliography .................................................................... 111 Figures and Tables Figures 3.1. Current Structure of Ukraine Ministry of Defense and General Staff ........................................................ 23 3.2. Proposed Organizational Structure for the Ukraine Ministry of Defense ................................................ 26 4.1. Proposed Operational Chain of Command .................... 44 4.2. Proposed Chain of Command for Personnel .....................51 4.3. Proposed Chain of Command for Procurement .................61 5.1. National Cybersecurity and Defense Organizational Structure ..............................................................83 Tables S.1. Recommended Structural Reforms ...............................xii S.2. Recommendations to Improve Warfighting ..................... xiv 4.1. Two Potential Force Structures for Ukraine ......................52 4.2. Potential Compensation Structure for Ukrainian Military Personnel ..................................................55 vii Summary The Maidan Revolution in Ukraine created an opportunity for change and reforms in a system that had resisted them for a quarter of a century. The war in the eastern region of Donbass that began in 2014 and con- tinues to this day has highlighted the desperate need for reforms both within Ukraine’s armed forces and in the security sector more broadly. In this report, we look at several aspects of Ukraine’s security sector. We assess what different institutions need to do and where gaps exist that preclude these institutions from being effective, efficient, transparent, and accountable. We then provide recommendations for changes Ukraine could make that would improve existing practices, in line with Euro-Atlantic standards and approaches. We provide rec- ommendations that do not require constitutional changes, due to the political challenges inherent in such reforms. However, we note that constitutional changes may prove advisable to ensure that Ukraine can build the security architecture that will serve it best. Clarify Roles and Responsibilities The roles and responsibilities of the President and Cabinet of Minis- ters (CoM) are ambiguous and the CoM is unwieldy. There are gaps and overlaps in the functions performed by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) and the General Staff (GS). Civilian control remains weak below the President and CoM. The Chief of Defense Force (CHoD) reports directly to the President, thereby disempowering the Minister ix x Security Sector Reform in Ukraine of Defense.1 Regulations and organizational culture tend to push rou- tine decisions upward to at least the Deputy Minister level, contribut- ing to a culture of avoiding responsibility. In the absence of substantial constitutional reform, which could prove politically infeasible, we recommend clarifying the roles and responsibilities of Ukraine’s leadership through legislation and policy documents. In particular, we recommend these declared roles and responsibilities: President: The President as the commander-in-chief would assume responsibility for the security and defense of Ukraine against threats to its sovereignty and independence. This description of the President’s role reflects the Constitution’s requirement that the Presi- dent “administer the national security and defence of the State.”2 The President would have responsibility for the command and control of military operations and policy control over the MoD and, through the Minister of Defense, over the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Prime Minister/Cabinet of Ministers:
Recommended publications
  • Euromaidan Newsletter # 343 CIVIC SECTOR of EUROMAIDAN
    CIVIC SECTOR OF EUROMAIDAN GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT 2020 EuroMaidan Newsletter # 343 17, - Kyiv denies calling for new elections in Belarus Ukraine shares EU position on elections in Belarus mercenaries to Russia. Delegations of Ukraine, UK, Baltic States to PACE condemn election violations, violence in Belarus, President's Office denies statement by Belarusian August 11 August 11 warn Russia against interference. administration saying that Kyiv calls for new election in country. Belarusian police detain and beat teenagers, injure 5-year-old. Iran’s ambassador to Ukraine has said that 343. compensation for the Ukrainian plane which was Ukraine generally shares EU position on elections # downed mistakenly near Tehran in January 2020 in Belarus – MFA. will be based on international regulations. UWC condemns violence against protesters in StopFakeNews with Marko Suprun (No. 293). Belarus. Fake: Terrorists arrested in Crimea. Russian From falsifications to Russia’s role: Nine questions constitutional changes make Crimea forever and answers about the protests in Belarus. Russian. Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry acknowledges Belarus to start missile troops, artillery exercise that Crimeans are forever lost to Ukraine. near Belarusian Nuclear Power Plant on Lithuanian Pro-Kremlin disinformation and elections in NEWSLETTER border on Monday. Belarus. Belarus initiates ‘mass riot’ criminal charges Kremlin watch briefing: Russia’s pillars of against detained Ukrainian rights activists. disinformation and propaganda. Belarus hands over 32 of 33 Russian Wagner Bestiarium Kremlinensis S – Z. Left: Flowers stronger than guns as “Ladies in White” protests spread throughout Belarus Centre: Chilling testimonies of police brutality, humiliation & “re-education” amid vicious crackdown on Belarusian protesters. Right: Lukashenko regime’s savagery may be backfiring in Belarus Protests in Belarus: is there anything Ukraine can do? Russian hybrid intervention into Belarus is likely imminent The gathering autumn clouds.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
    ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • September 12, 2006 the Honorable John Warner, Chairman The
    GENERAL JOHN SHALIKASHVILI, USA (RET.) GENERAL JOSEPH HOAR, USMC (RET.) ADMIRAL GREGORY G. JOHNSON, USN (RET.) ADMIRAL JAY L. JOHNSON, USN (RET.) GENERAL PAUL J. KERN, USA (RET.) GENERAL MERRILL A. MCPEAK, USAF (RET.) ADMIRAL STANSFIELD TURNER, USN (RET.) GENERAL WILLIAM G. T. TUTTLE JR., USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL DANIEL W. CHRISTMAN, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL PAUL E. FUNK, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL ROBERT G. GARD JR., USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAY M. GARNER, USA (RET.) VICE ADMIRAL LEE F. GUNN, USN (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL ARLEN D. JAMESON, USAF (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL CLAUDIA J. KENNEDY, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL DONALD L. KERRICK, USA (RET.) VICE ADMIRAL ALBERT H. KONETZNI JR., USN (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL CHARLES OTSTOTT, USA (RET.) VICE ADMIRAL JACK SHANAHAN, USN (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL HARRY E. SOYSTER, USA (RET.) LIEUTENANT GENERAL PAUL K. VAN RIPER, USMC (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL JOHN BATISTE, USA (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL EUGENE FOX, USA (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL JOHN L. FUGH, USA (RET.) REAR ADMIRAL DON GUTER, USN (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL FRED E. HAYNES, USMC (RET.) REAR ADMIRAL JOHN D. HUTSON, USN (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL MELVYN MONTANO, ANG (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL GERALD T. SAJER, USA (RET.) MAJOR GENERAL MICHAEL J. SCOTTI JR., USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL DAVID M. BRAHMS, USMC (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL JAMES P. CULLEN, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL EVELYN P. FOOTE, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL DAVID R. IRVINE, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL JOHN H. JOHNS, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL RICHARD O’MEARA, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL MURRAY G. SAGSVEEN, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL JOHN K. SCHMITT, USA (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL ANTHONY VERRENGIA, USAF (RET.) BRIGADIER GENERAL STEPHEN N.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of Five Khanh Hoa Viet Cong Prisoners of War On
    —n '(f "’ , • -----~• ... _, ..• .,_~ •.., ~ \ _____,_......:-..a,.\._LrUJ•...:»..---.......,____.....:.... __ -~,.a: -- • ‘17:" '- unsung ... _- ,'. ... .‘ ' . _ l I *-u ’| ,- -. :3??? -" I. *find ".' .' r, “'- 'W'b’FOVe’proved for Release: 2019/01/17 C06772377 "T; I. 1: y. _..a 1'. .. I‘ T‘JZ'YI‘H“ '5‘, ‘TO‘FMWS‘EO'OTO‘HH 0877237 iffi%{2?%1.EKHRTJ¢¥Wifififlfifiififlfififi¥33Ru3» u -w.._«whfifififlgfifiVVNfijfifififii§§fifiggflg •• • EO ' ‘ 13526 ' •o PRIORITY 3.3(h)(2)3.3(h)(2 CENTRAL iNTELLIGENCEINTELLIGENCE AGENCYACENCY EO . IN 44916“#916 . IntelligenceIntelligenCe InfInformationonnation Cable 13526 PAGE 1 OF12OF 12 PWig-5(0) ~.5(c) STATE/INR DIA NMCC/MCMC CSECDEF{SECDEP JCS.Ics ARM?ARMY NAVYHAW AIR>AIR) CIA/NMCC NICmc NSANBA SDO500 ONEcm: (Tiny ssgr/zfmnDD/ t BIAEXO mace! OER FBISF319 DCSncs IRSms AID 1A Thts mntcrlnl '9Pcontalnsmin lnforme.tloni BH'ectlngeflectin the NationalNe.Uonol Defense of thothe 'OnttedUnited States wttblnwithin the meanlni;meaning Ofor tbethe EsDlonngeionnge Laws,Lawn. Tlt.leTitle 18,18. t1.B.O.0.3.0. secs.Ehecig fl793z‘ggcgwi and C73.794, tbein: gnégrsntl'IUlllmlB&Onfiaiésg?‘ or revelationreve Titian of wblcbwhich IDin 110.:,an? mannermanor to an unautborlZcdunauthorized per&0nperson 1Bis prohlbltedprohibited byy lnw.law. GROUP I ' !Ild:§::'°l::¥nog:i:n:jI ■d..d•d fro• 0111t0fft0tif N~EMN0 F 155m cl01fllP19•adi111g o,id I dHl011.1 foe a 16011 - ' -- THIS IS AEJNFORMATIONAN NFORMATION REPORT,REPORT. NOT FINALLY EVALUATED INTELLIGENCE. ---”MT--- -c- -- ·: - I CITE(315% 3.5(c) 5 CONF IALIALE l 0G14os06n+ ' z ~~~~~~ ECONF. A . .. — ' 05 Z DIST[”51- 6 FEBRUARY 1968 COUNTRYcwmm ' SOUTH%MHWUMM‘ VIETNAM 1110/7/09 fl✓wv9545-II 9-13 DOI 3.3(h)(2)3911112) SUBJECT VIEWS OF FIVE KHANH HOA VIET‘JIET CONG PRISONERS OF0F WARMAR ON OBJECTIVES OF CURRENT VC MILITtRYMILITARY ACTI~ITY~ACTIVITYQ ' ' THEIR RESPONSI~ILITIESRESPONSIEILTTIES HAD T~ETHE VC TAKEN NHA C'-.
    [Show full text]
  • Türkçe Öğreniyoruz 3
    TÜRKÇE ÖĞRENİYORUZ 3 Türkçe - İngilizce Anahtar Kitap Türkçe Öğreniyoruz HI Türkçe - İngilizce Anahtar Kitap Nur Yamaç - Isabella Akıncı engin yayınevi TATİL PROGRAMI HOLIDAY PROGRAMME tatil yapmak to have a holiday, to go on holiday aynı şekilde in the same way konuşmak to talk karar vermek to decide ısrar etmek to insist on hem... hem de both... and... (...and..., too) tarihî eser historical works birkaç a few, a couple bir yerde kalmak to stay somewhere yakın yerler nearby places gezmek to go about, to travel, to cruise (on a ship) uzun uzadıya extensively tartışmak to discuss turizm acentesi travel agency bir şey sormak to ask a question dikkatle dinlemek to listen carefully gülerek smilingly, with a smiling face tavsiye etmek to advise yat yacht yata binmek to board a yacht sahil boyunca along the coast antik kent antique city bir şeye rastlamak to come across something ıssız ada desert island gürültü noise kafa dinlemek to rest in a quiet place anlaşmak to come to an agreement MAVİ YOLCULUK THE BLUE CRUISE güneşin doğması sunrise teknek boat uyumak to sleep güneş the sun altın bir küre gibi like a golden sphere gece night karanlık darkness bir şeyi yok etmek to make something disappear köpük foam ilerlemek to move, to go forward rüzgar the wind saç hair bir şeyi okşamak to caress (or stroke) something balık fish güneşin ilk ışıkları the first rays of the sun bir şeyle yarış yapmak to race against something teknenin sağ yanında on the right side of the boat yunus balığı dolphin, porpoise gözlerine inanamak not to be able to believe
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Armed Forces
    June 23, 2021 Ukrainian Armed Forces In 2014, the Ukrainian military, which observers noted had lower (around 2.5% of GDP). Ukraine’s 2021 defense been weakened by years of neglect and underfunding, faced budget is 117.6 billion hryvnia ($4.2 billion), 127 million Russia’s occupation of Ukraine’s Crimea region and hryvnia ($4.6 million) less than 2020’s budget. invasion of eastern Ukraine. Since that time, the Ukrainian Additionally, Ukraine’s defense budget allocations are split armed forces have made considerable improvements; they between funds necessary to maintain the military and funds have undertaken efforts to adopt NATO standards and to support its ambitious reform program. received significant NATO and U.S. assistance. Many of these reforms began out of the experience of defending Ukraine inherited a sprawling defense industry from the against Russian aggression. Reforms range from the tactical Soviet Union, producing a wide range of products, to the strategic levels and include both political measures including tanks and armored vehicles, aircraft, radars and (e.g., increasing transparency, countering corruption, and electronics, missiles, and ships. Defense conglomerate ensuring civilian control over the military) and military Ukroboronprom oversees the defense industry, which reforms (e.g., modernizing equipment, reforming command comprises over 130 state-run companies. In recent years, and control, and increasing professionalization). Ukrainian officials have made reforming Ukroboronprom and increasing transparency key goals, including passing a Significant hurdles remain, however, and the reform new law, On Defense Procurement, in July 2020 to process is complicated by Ukraine’s Soviet legacy, the implement NATO standards in defense procurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D European & Security ES & Defence 4/2016 International Security and Defence Journal Protected Logistic Vehicles ISSN 1617-7983 • www.euro-sd.com • Naval Propulsion South Africa‘s Defence Exports Navies and shipbuilders are shifting to hybrid The South African defence industry has a remarkable breadth of capa- and integrated electric concepts. bilities and an even more remarkable depth in certain technologies. August 2016 Jamie Shea: NATO‘s Warsaw Summit Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology The backbone of every strong troop. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles. When your mission is clear. When there’s no road for miles around. And when you need to give all you’ve got, your equipment needs to be the best. At times like these, we’re right by your side. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles: armoured, highly capable off-road and logistics vehicles with payloads ranging from 0.5 to 110 t. Mobilising safety and efficiency: www.mercedes-benz.com/defence-vehicles Editorial EU Put to the Test What had long been regarded as inconceiv- The second main argument of the Brexit able became a reality on the morning of 23 campaigners was less about a “democratic June 2016. The British voted to leave the sense of citizenship” than of material self- European Union. The majority that voted for interest. Despite all the exception rulings "Brexit", at just over 52 percent, was slim, granted, the United Kingdom is among and a great deal smaller than the 67 percent the net contribution payers in the EU. This who voted to stay in the then EEC in 1975, money, it was suggested, could be put to but ignoring the majority vote is impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 09.Qxd
    David Lewis, senior research fellow in the Department of Peace Studies at the University of Bradford, England, served previously as director of the International Crisis Group’s Central Asia Project, based in Kyrgyzstan. High Times on the Silk Road The Central Asian Paradox David Lewis In medieval times, traders carried jewels, seems like a major threat to the region, spices, perfumes , and fabulous fabrics along since it is so inextricably linked to violent the legendary Silk Route through Central crime and political instability in many other Asia. Today, the goods are just as valuable, parts of the world . More people died in but infinitely more dangerous. Weapons and Mexican drug violence in 2009 than in Iraq. equipment for American troops in Afghan- In Brazil , the government admits about istan travel from west to east, along the 23,000 drug-related homicides each year— vital lifeline of the Northern Supply Route. some ten times the number of civilians In the other direction, an unadvertised, but killed in the war in Afghanistan . And it ’s no less deadly product travels along the not just Latin America that suffers. On same roads, generating billions of dollars in Afghanistan’s border with Iran, there are illicit profits. As much as 25 percent of regular clashes between Iranian counter- Afghanistan’s heroin production is exported narcotics units and drug smugglers. Hun - through the former Soviet states of Central dreds of border guards have been killed Asia, and the UN’s drug experts express over the past decade in fights with heroin grave concerns . Antonio Maria Costa, head and opium traffickers.
    [Show full text]
  • 14819/06 DCL 1 /Dl GSC.SMART.2.C Delegations Will Find Attached The
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 August 2018 (OR. en) 14819/06 DCL 1 SCH-EVAL 177 FRONT 221 COMIX 916 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST14819/06 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 10 November 2006 new status: Public Subject: Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - POLAND : report on Land Borders Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 14819/06 DCL 1 /dl GSC.SMART.2.C EN RESTREINT COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 November 2006 THE EUROPEAN UNION 14819/06 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 177 FRONT 221 COMIX 916 REPORT from: the Land BordersEvaluation Committee to: the Schengen Evaluation Working Party Subject : Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - POLAND : report on Land Borders TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 3 2. Management summary ............................................................................................................... 4 3. General information .................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Organisational (functional) structure ................................................................................ 9 3.3. Operational effectiveness ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 024682/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt Am 05/06/18
    024682/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt am 05/06/18 Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 June 2018 (OR. en) 8832/1/06 REV 1 DCL 1 SCH-EVAL 78 FRONT 89 COMIX 408 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST8832/1/06 REV 1 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 20 July 2006 new status: Public Subject: Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - POLAND: report on Sea Borders Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 8832/1/06 REV 1 DCL 1 /dl DGF 2C EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 20 July 2006 THE EUROPEAN UNION 8832/1/06 REV 1 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 78 FRONT 89 COMIX 408 REPORT from: the Evaluation Committee Sea Borders to: the Schengen Evaluation Working Party Subject : Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - POLAND: report on Sea Borders This report was made by the Evaluation Committee Sea Borders and will be brought to the attention of the Sch-Eval Working Party which will ensure a report and the presentation of the follow-up thereto to the Council. 8832/1/06 REV 1 EB/mdc 1 DG H 2 RESTREINT UE EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Management summary ............................................................................................................... 5 3. General information ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LAW of UKRAINE on Civil Service
    LAW OF UKRAINE On Civil Service This Law defines legal and organizational principles of civil service, and conditions and procedures for the exercise of the right to civil service by citizens of Ukraine. SECTION І GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. Terms and definitions 1. The terms listed below shall have the following meanings herein: 1) civil service shall mean professional activities of civil servants including development of proposals on state policy making, ensuring its implementation, and provision of administrative services; 2) civil servant shall mean a citizen of Ukraine holding a civil service position in any public agency of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or their secretariats (apparatus); earning a salary paid from the funds of the state budget unless otherwise specified by the law; and exercising the powers specified for that position and directly related to realization of tasks and performance of functions of the public agency of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea as regards: development of proposals on state policy making; drafting, examination, and/or editing of draft legal acts; provision of administrative services; public monitoring and supervision; management of state property of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, including management of state corporate rights; human resource management in public agencies of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or their secretariats; realization of other powers (or competence) of the respective public agency; 3) an order shall mean a form of exercise
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations and Acronyms
    PART II] THE GAZETTE OF PAKISTAN, EXTRA., MARCH 5, 2019 1 ISLAMABAD, TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 2019 PART II Statutory Notifications, (S.R.O.) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (Navy Branch) NOTIFICATIONS Rawalpindi, the 25th February, 2019 S.R.O. 283(I)/2019.—The following confirmation is made in the rank of Lieut under N.I. 20/71: Pakistan Navy Ag Lt to be Lt Date of Seniority Date of Grant of Gained during S. No Rank/Name/P No Confirmation SSC as Ag Training as Lt Lt (M-D) Ag Lt (SSC)(WE) 06-01-14 with 1. Muhammad Fawad Hussain PN 06-01-14 +01-25 seniority from (P No 9094) 11-11-13 [Case No.CW/0206/70/PC/NHQ/ dated.] (1) Price: Rs. 20.00 [340(2019)/Ex. Gaz.] 2 THE GAZETTE OF PAKISTAN, EXTRA., MARCH 5, 2019 [PART II S.R.O. 284(I)/2019.—Following officers are granted local rank of Commander w.e.f the dates mentioned against their names under NR-0634: S. No. Rank/Name/P No Date of Grant of Local Rank of Cdr OPERATIONS BRANCH 1. Lt Cdr (Ops) Muhammad Saleem PN 06-05-18 (P No 5111) 2. Lt Cdr (Ops) Wasim Zafar PN 01-07-18 (P No 6110) 3. Lt Cdr (Ops) Mubashir Nazir Farooq PN 01-07-18 (P No 6204) 4. Lt Cdr (Ops) Mohammad Ayaz PN 01-07-18 (P No 6217) 5. Lt Cdr (Ops) Tahir Majeed Asim TI(M) PN 01-07-18 (P No 6229) 6. Lt Cdr (Ops) Muhammad Farman PN 01-07-18 (P No 6209) 7.
    [Show full text]