Wind Farm Update April 2008.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wind Farm Update April 2008.Pdf April 2008 W NNDDFAARMRM ByUUPDATE Dr Julian Elder PDATE he decision on WEL Networks’ proposed wind farm at Te Uku is expected to be Tannounced by the Waikato District Council in the near future. Like you, we keenly await the outcome. I’m sending you this UPDATE to provide important background information as part of WEL’s commitment to on-going consultation with the greater Raglan community. The UPDATE forms no part of the resource consent process. The business case for the wind farm is strong and financially sound. Otherwise, we would not be risking an investment of $200 million, particularly when we are owned by the community. The Te Uku wind farm project will only go ahead if it is profitable. But we do acknowledge that there are residents with mixed feelings about the wind farm, and those who oppose it. The proposed wind farm is among the smaller of the wind farms either in operation or planned elsewhere in New Zealand. The generation of power to meet the growing demands of consumers and industry always presents a dilemma. New Zealanders are demanding renewable energy resources, yet at the same time they are demanding more supply. In the Waikato region, 55 percent more power will be needed in the next 10 years to meet the growth of both residential and business consumers. NO TO NUCLEAR POWER Coal fired power stations are being rejected and no-one supports nuclear power. Other ways to deliver power, such as bio mass, tidal and solar, are not currently realistic in commercial terms. Wind, as an energy resource, continues globally as the most widely accepted form of renewable and sustainable generation. WEL has spent five years evaluating a number of sites in the Waikato region and based on that research the Te Uku site is the best location available to us. The wind data collected over the past three years at Te Uku confirms the site’s viability. There is a very real benefit to Raglan if the wind farm proceeds. As a direct result, the power supply will become more secure. We have planned a lines upgrade for Raglan for completion in 2017. But the new wind farm will require this to be completed in 2010 at the earliest along with a new substation at Raglan if the project proceeds. With, or without the wind farm, this work will go ahead. INVESTING IN RAGLAN Meanwhile, over the past three years the company has invested $4 million in improving the power supply to the Raglan district quite separately from planning for the wind farm. Now that we are all in a waiting mode over the wind farm decision, we felt it important to send you this Wind farm UPDATE. It has been prepared to answer questions you might still have and, hopefully, to correct some misinformation that is circulating in the community. As you can imagine, the evidence from both sides represents hundreds of thousands of words, much of it very technical. All of the documents can be viewed at the offices of the Waikato District Council. Alternatively, the WEL evidence is available on the company website, www.wel.co.nz. If you do have any questions please contact the Wind Farm Project Team at the address shown on the back of the UPDATE. *Dr Julian Elder is Chief Executive of WEL Networks Limited and has a background in infrastructure engineering and construction. He has a Doctorate in power generation. majority indicating that they were happy with the Why have the turbines level and quality of information provided to them increased in height from 80 by WEL. Almost everyone thought the information metres to 137 metres. WEL was excellent or good in terms of being clear and Networks told us in a brochure easy to understand. that the turbines would only be 80 After the delivery of the information pack, a series metres high. of advertised public meetings were held in Te Uku, Te Mata, Raglan, Kawhia and Te Akau regions. At At the time of announcing the these meetings, all WEL’s representatives were feasibility study we were in the early available to the public, including the CEO, the stages of considering a range of turbines, project team and expert consultants. sizes and models, from a number of international manufacturers. Two open days were also held at Te Uku. During the fi rst stage of informing the public, WEL fl ew 43 We felt it was important to give the residents residents to the Te Apiti wind farm in Palmerston a sense of visual perspective of the North so they could see for themselves an proposed turbines. So WEL announced operating wind farm. the feasibility study for the proposed site In terms of outcomes from this public process, quoting the turbines under consideration WEL then made a number of changes to the with a hub height of 80 metres and a total project, including repositioning of a turbine. height of 125 metres to the top of the blade. We believe that WEL has made every possible However, after presenting this information to effort to ensure accurate representation of the the community, we identifi ed that the Vestas visual impact, including the Te Apiti wind farm V90 turbine was the most suitable generic Many residents say they visit, which enabled people to make up their own model for the site. It had a hub height of 90 consider that WEL tried to deceive minds on noise and visual impact. metres and total height of 137 metres at the peak them by failing to include the In the event that the Commissioners grant of the blade. Telecom receiver tower in the the wind farm application, and subject During the second round of public open days, photographs published in the to any Environment Court appeal, it is WEL’s intention to set up a community the new turbine height size was discussed with original brochures. Why did WEL those who attended these meetings and this liaison group. This group, with WEL’s support, remove the receiver? would provide an opportunity for direct contact is where the confusion between the hub with the company and the project team. (see height from the initial 80 to the now 90 This is incorrect. The Telecom receiver has community liaison group question on page 4). metres arose. always been in the photographs but it is diffi cult to see against the skyline, particularly because of Much has been made of wind Originally there were only 24 the distance between where the photo was taken data at the site. Why did WEL ignore turbines. Now there are 28. Why? and the actual tower and turbine location some 3 kms away. data gathered independently over a It is correct that in the original information WEL 10 year period at another site? WEL has always been concerned to ensure planned for 24 turbines. that the community has been presented with The wind data related to a different location As landowner agreements became fi nalised the visual material that accurately refl ects the size some 10kms away from the Te Uku site and turbine layout was revised and subsequently of the turbines. at a much lower level relating to the ground increased to 28. conditions. WEL has been monitoring wind As well as the brochure, photographs of the fl ows at the plateau site for three years using The decision to add four more turbines was turbine sizes were clearly indicated in a specially internationally recognised and sophisticated discussed with those who attended the two produced CD. technology for wind data collection. community open days at Te Uku and has Why hasn’t WEL listened to the been consistent with all other subsequent Why did WEL make it diffi cult for information including the application. concerns of the community? submitters by holding the resource The application has always been available WEL has been proactive in communicating with hearings in Ngaruawahia instead of for public inspection at the offi ces of the the community located close to the wind farm at the Te Uku hall or at a venue in Waikato District Council (WDC) since it was and indeed the much wider community extending Raglan? It would have been more lodged on 19 March, 2007. from Whatawhata, Aotea, Kawhia, Raglan convenient and less travel cost township and over the harbour to Te Akau. More WEL is not seeking to increase the number than 7000 information packs announcing the for submitters. of turbines from 28 should the application feasibility study, were delivered to the area, as The hearing process was managed by the be successful. well as business and community leaders Waikato District Council. We understand that throughout the region served by WEL. because of the number of staff, fi les and the need We note in the application that for computer access that the WDC preferred the Professional research was undertaken by a WEL indicated a turbine numbered hearing at their facilities in Ngaruawahia. member of the Market Research Society of New as 29. Yet this is in confl ict with Zealand, Versus Research, following delivery WEL’s application for 28 turbines. of this information. It showed more than 80% We are concerned at the level Why? support for the project from those living in the of noise expected to be generated greater Raglan area, support in Te Uku was 64%, from the wind farm. There is a “number 29” turbine. only 17% opposed. The research had a margin Wind farms do generate noise, but at levels that As a result of community feedback, and after of error of 3.7%.
Recommended publications
  • Meridian Energy
    NEW ZEALAND Meridian Energy Performance evaluation Meridian Energy equity valuation Macquarie Research’s discounted cashflow-based equity valuation for Meridian Energy (MER) is $6,531m (nominal WACC 8.6%, asset beta 0.60, TGR 3.0%). Forecast financial model A detailed financial model with explicit forecasts out to 2030 has been completed and is summarised in this report. Inside Financial model assumptions and commentary Performance evaluation 2 We discuss a number of key model input assumptions in the report including: Valuation summary 6 Wholesale and retail electricity price paths; Financial model assumptions 8 Electricity purchase to sales price ratio pre and post the HVDC link upgrade; Financial statements summary 18 HVDC link charging regime; Financial flexibility and generation Electricity demand growth by customer type; development 21 The impact of the Electricity Industry Act (EIA) asset transfer and VAS’; Sensitivities 22 The New Zealand Aluminium Smelters (NZAS) supply contract; Alternative valuation methodologies 23 Relative disclosure 24 MER’s generation development pipeline. Appendix – Valuation Bridge 26 Equity valuation sensitivities are provided on key variables. Alternative valuation methodology We have assessed a comparable company equity valuation for the company of $5,179m-$5,844m. This is based on the current earnings multiples of listed comparable generator/retailers globally. This valuation provides a cross-check of the equity valuation based on our primary methodology, discounted cashflow. This valuation range lies below our primary valuation due, in part to the positive net present value of modelled development projects included in our primary valuation. Relative disclosure We have assessed the disclosure levels of MER’s financial reports and presentations over the last financial period against listed and non-listed companies operating in the electricity generation and energy retailing sector in New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaimai Wind Farm Tourism and Recreation Impact Assessment
    Kaimai Wind Farm Tourism and Recreation Impact Assessment REPORT TO VENTUS ENERGY LTD MAY 2018 Document Register Version Report date V 1 Final draft 31 August 2017 V2 GS comments 10 Oct 2017 V3 Visual assessment, cycle route 30 Nov 2017 V4 Updated visual assessment 16 February 2018 V5 Turbine update 30 May 2018 Acknowledgements This report has been prepared by TRC Tourism Ltd. Disclaimer Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith but on the basis that TRC Tourism is not liable to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to in this document. K AIMAI WIND FARM TOURISM AND RECREATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction and Background ........................................................................... 4 2 Existing Recreation and Tourism Setting ........................................................... 5 3 Assessment of Potential Effects ...................................................................... 12 4 Recommendations and Mitigation .................................................................. 18 5 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 20 K AIMAI WIND FARM TOURISM AND RECREATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Te Uku Wind Farm, Near Raglan, Are Finding Out
    new zealand wind energy association ›› www.windenergy.org.nz Wind Energy Case Study Business and community opportunities There is more to wind energy than wind turbines and renewable energy. A new wind farm can become a catalyst for business and community renewal, as the people involved with Te Uku wind farm, near Raglan, are finding out. Earthworks at Te Uku wind farm Out towards Raglan, Meridian Energy is developing a new wind “I was just a one-man band but I had to employ staff and learn all farm at Te Uku. This high and windy site has become an important about how to do that. It was a real eye opener but I had lots of help community asset. The wind farm has added a new, positive dynamic from the managers of the construction firms Hick Bros and Spartan to this isolated farming site. Construction,” says Jim. It was a very wet winter, which did not help, but Jim is proud of Business opportunities his contribution. “We all need power at the end of the day.” An important aspect of the construction and ongoing management Local Hamilton firm Spartan Construction together with Hick of the wind farm was that the existing farm operations had to Bros from Silverdale formed Hick Spartan Joint Venture and continue with little or no disruption. That meant that stock and won the contract to supply infrastructure roading, foundations pasture had to be managed along with heavy construction, quarrying and erosion and sediment control at Te Uku. They won the and new roading. Jim Munns, a local fencer played an integral role.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 WDC Factsheet Raglan
    VISIT. OPENWAIKATO.CO.NZ CALL. 0800 252 626 RAGLAN RAGLAN IS A WORLD FAMOUS WEST COAST SURFING AND BEACH TOWN, JUST 150KM SOUTH OF CENTRAL AUCKLAND AND 46KM WEST OF HAMILTON. IT DRAWS Raglan is a stunning township on Waikato’s west coast with three surf PEOPLE FROM ALL CORNERS beaches on its doorstep and an outstanding natural harbour. The town is steeped in history, dating back to early Ma¯ori who arrived OF THE GLOBE, ATTRACTED on the migratory canoe, Tainui. Early European settlers knew the town as Whaingaroa. It was renamed Raglan in 1858, after Lord Raglan, BY ITS MAGNIFICENT who was an officer in the Crimean War and led the charge of the Light SCENERY AND CREATIVE VIBE. Brigade. Today, it is known by both names. The town’s rugged landscape, superb surf waves and relaxed atmosphere make it a very popular destination for artists, surfers and holidaymakers. NTH The population grows by 300-400 per cent during summer. Auckland KEY: Activities in Raglan include surfing and kite boarding, kayaking, fishing, 158km Towns sport fishing and harbour activities, tramping, horse-trekking and walking. 2hr Roads There is a thriving township, full of fashion, arts and crafts, jewellery and Rail gift shops. A wide range of cafés and restaurants is available alongside a historical hotel. A large number of talented and creative artists have made Raglan their home. Discover original art, pottery, weaving, stone carving, jewellery and photography. Raglan also offesr a wide range of entertainment events throughout the year. Land Supply Six hectares of industrial land is currently available in Raglan for 50km 150km development.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato 179 Protection of Threatened Species in New Zealand Pip Wallace* and Shaun Fluker† The need to protect threatened species and facilitate their recovery to viable population levels enjoys widespread international support, but it is the domestic legal rules of individual nations that will implement international calls for protection and recovery. New Zealand purports to protect threatened species primarily with the Wildlife Act 1953, a statute whose purpose is more concerned with wildlife management than implementing a legal framework to protect threatened species. The consensus is that the Wildlife Act 1953 and other applicable legislation such as the Resource Management Act 1991 is not up to the task of protection and recovery of threatened species in New Zealand. In this article we explore how dedicated threatened species legislation in New Zealand might improve on the existing legal framework, and in particular with respect to the designation and planning on threatened species, recovery programmes and habitat protection. For an illustration of how these components may contribute to the threatened species problem we look to Canada as a nation which enacted dedicated threatened species legislation in 2002. The story thus far in Canada suggests legal rules are not a panacea for species decline, but nonetheless dedicated legislation can offer substantial benefits such as transparency and a systematic approach to species planning, better integration with resource development, and a measure of accountability in law to hold public officials to their promises on threatened species protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy Annual Report for Year Ended !" June #"$" How Much Power?
    Meridian Energy Annual Report for year ended !" June #"$" How much power? Meridian is the largest state-owned electricity generator in New Zealand, providing around 30% of New Zealand's total generation. We also retail electricity to more than 180,000 residential, rural and business customers. NAME: CalRENEW!1 NO. OF PV PANELS: %",""" CAPACITY: %MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' # i NAME: Mt Millar3 NAME: Ross Island NO. OF TURBINES: !% NAME: Macarthur2 NO. OF TURBINES: ! CAPACITY: &"MW LOCATION: Victoria CAPACITY: $MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED STAGE: Pre-construction design !"##$%&#' $" CAPACITY: '#"MW NAME: Mt Mercer LOCATION: Victoria STAGE: Pre-construction design CAPACITY: $!"MW Front Cover: The Ross Island wind farm and Mt Erebus from Observation Hill, Antarctica. Courtesy of George Blaisdell, Antarctica NZ Pictorial Collection. NAME: Central Wind NAME: Te Āpiti STAGE: Consented NO. OF TURBINES: ## CAPACITY: !"$MW CAPACITY: '$MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' %"# TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##(%#$' %$' NAME: Ohau A NAME: Te Uku NO. OF GENERATORS: & STAGE: Under construction CAPACITY: ")&MW CAPACITY: )&MW NAME: West Wind TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !,!%& !"##$%&#' NO. OF TURBINES: )" NAME: Mill Creek TOTAL GWh PRODUCED '(% CAPACITY: !&%MW !"##(%#$' STAGE: Environment Court appeal TOTAL GWh PRODUCED &'* CAPACITY: )*MW !"##$%&#' TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##(%#$' %( NAME: Ohau B NAME: Mokihinui NO. OF GENERATORS: & STAGE: Environment Court appeal CAPACITY: "!"MW CAPACITY: (#MW NAME: Tekapo A TOTAL GWh PRODUCED '&( !"##$%&#' NO. OF GENERATORS: ! ii TOTAL GWh PRODUCED iii CAPACITY: !"##(%#$' (%& "#MW Brooklyn TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' !#" TOTAL GWh PRODUCED Wellington !"##(%#$' !"& NAME: Ohau C NO. OF GENERATORS: & CAPACITY: "!"MW NAME: Hurunui Wind TOTAL GWh PRODUCED STAGE: Consultation NAME: Tekapo B !"##$%&#' '&$ CAPACITY: *(MW NO. OF GENERATORS: " TOTAL GWh PRODUCED ("( !"##(%#$' Christchurch CAPACITY: !)$MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' (!* TOTAL GWh PRODUCED (%% NAME: Benmore !"##(%#$' Twizel NAME: Hunter Downs Irrigation NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy to Partner with AGL in Developing Southern
    Meridian Energy to partner with AGL in developing Southern Hemisphere’s largest wind farm For immediate release: New Zealand's largest renewable electricity generator, Meridian, and Australia's largest renewable electricity generator AGL today announced the establishment of a joint venture to build what will be the southern hemisphere's biggest wind farm. The project is the 420 MW Macarthur wind farm in southwest Victoria. The final build cost will be around A$1 billion and is due for completion in 2013. Meridian’s 50 percent investment share in the project will be made through a combination of equity and project finance which will be sourced by the joint venture partners. Meridian chief executive Tim Lusk said today the investment was consistent with Meridian’s Australian wind investment strategy, which earlier this year saw the company acquire the 70 MW Mt Millar wind farm in South Australia. “The Macarthur project is a great opportunity to facilitate our growth ambitions in Australia. The project offers long term, reliable generation revenues which will complement the rest of Meridian’s developing Australian wind portfolio. The electricity purchase contracts have been structured in a way that the joint venture does not take market price or electricity production volume risk.” Mr Lusk said Macarthur cements a long term relationship between Meridian and AGL. “This joint venture between the largest renewable developers in New Zealand and Australia, each bringing complementary skill sets to the project, gives us great confidence that it will be delivered successfully. The good cultural fit evident between the parties creates ongoing opportunities for joint development.” As well as the Macarthur project and the Mt Millar wind farm, Meridian has a number of other high quality wind development sites in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 366 the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 16
    366 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 16 Name Situation and Remarks Name Situation and Remarks Heipipi ., Trig. Station L. Map reference, N. 82/ Tawhitirahi For Trig Station Y. in the Coromandel area. 326858. Instead of "Hepipi". Map reference, N. 44/031625. Horokaretu Stream Tributary of Orongo Stream. Map reference, Te Hue Stream A tributary of Waitomotomo Stream. Map N.64/545324. reference, N. 64/383318. Kaingata Stream Drains into Aotea Harbour from Trig. Te Mata Stream A tributary of the Opotoru River. Map re­ "Pirau". Map reference, N. 64/407250. ference, N. 64/388378. Instead of "Kaingote Stream". Te Mauku Point Coastal point It miles south-west of Trig. Kaitoke Creek A tidal tributary of Opotoru River. Map "Mauku". Map reference, approximately reference, N. 64/4044. N.82/1866. King Fern Stream .. Tributary of Settlers Stream. Map reference, Te Pare .. For Trig Station in the vicinity of Hahei. N.44/106417. Map reference, N. 44/309614. KoruaBay For bay in Aotea Harbour. Map reference, Te Pupuha Point Coastal point east of Hahei. Map reference N. 64/350217. Instead of "Koruahamuti N. 44/315605. Instead of "Te Pupuka Bay". Point". Kupapa Point At the mouth of the Waitetuna River which TePuru .. For locality and stream in Thames County enters Raglan Harbour. Map reference, situated approximately 7 miles north of N,64/485465. Thames. Manaia .. Locality near the mouth of the Manaia Te Putahaehae Tributary of the Awakino River draining River and at the head of Manaia Har­ Stream from Maungatewharau (hill). bour at the north-western shores of Te Rekereke Stream Flows into the sea near Woody Head.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Kuiti Piopio Kawhia Raglan Regional
    Helensville 1 Town/City Road State Highway Expressway Thermal Explorer Highway Cycle Trails Waikato River REGIONAL MAP Hamilton Airport i-SITE Visitor Information Centre Information Centre Thermal Geyser Surf Beach Water Fall Forest Mountain Range AUCKLAND Coromandel Peninsula Clevedon To Whitianga Miranda Thames Pukekohe Whangamata Waiuku POKENO To Thames Maramarua 2 Mangatarata to River TUAKAU Meremere aika W Hampton Downs Hauraki 25 Rail Trail Paeroa PORT WAIKATO Te Kauwhata Waihi 2 Rangiriri 2 Glen 1 Murray Tahuna 26 Kaimai-Mamaku Mount Forest Park Lake Hakanoa Te Aroha Mt Te Aroha Lake Puketirni HUNTLY TE AROHA 27 26 Waiorongomai Valley Taupiri Tatuanui 2 1B Gordonton Te Akau Te Awa NGARUAWAHIA MORRINSVILLE River Ride Ngarua Waingaro TAURANGA 39 Horotiu 2 27 Walton Wairere Falls Raglan HAMILTON Harbour Waharoa 2 Whatawhata Matangi RAGLAN MATAMATA Manu Bay Tamahere 1B 29 23 Te Puke Mt Karioi Raglan Trails CAMBRIDGE 29 Ngahinapouri Ruapuke 27 Beach Ohaupo Piarere 3 Te Awa Lake Te Pahu Bridal Veil Pirongia Forest Park River Ride Karapiro 1 Aotea Falls TIRAU Harbour 5 Mt Pirongia Pirongia Sanctuary TE AWAMUTU Mountain KAWHIA Kihikihi Mt Maungatautari PUTARURU 33 Pukeatua To Rotorua Parawera Arapuni 5 Kawhia 31 Harbour Tihiroa 3 Te Puia Springs 39 1 ROTORUA Hot Water Beach Waikato Optiki River Trails Taharoa OTOROHANGA WAITOMO CAVES Marokopa Falls 3 TOKOROA To Rotorua Waimahora 1 5 Marokopa TE KUITIKUITI 32 30 Mangakino Rangitoto 3 Pureora Forest Park Whakamaru to River Waika PIOPIOPIOPIO 30 4 Pureora Forest Park 32 3 30 To Taumarunui
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Communities Scheme Funding for the Waikato District
    Draft Creative Communities Scheme funding for the Waikato District - the Waikato District CCS committee needs to urgently seek additional funding from Creative New Zealand so that it can continue to support arts and creative projects across the entire district at the right level. Raglan Community Arts Council (RCAC) is the arts creative organisation for Raglan Whaingaroa and was given this designation in the NZ Government Gazette in 1984. It is also a registered NZ Charity. It receives no permanent funding from central or local Government. RCAC covers a large part of costs from its own fund raising activities. For the shortfall on arts projects it looks to funders for support. RCAC has a strategic plan and activities follow that plan. Two centres of excellence are part of the plan. These are clay art and filmmaking. Three major events are also part of the strategic plan. These are Raglan Art to Wear, Raglan Film Festival and Raglan Arts Weekend. Although these three events have now run for a number of years, they have changed considerably over the years. For example the Film Festival started off as just a screening of several art house movies. It has now become an inspiration and celebration of youth and community filmmaking. Each of these ongoing major events involves new participants and audiences and covers a wider area within the surrounding district – not just within Raglan ie Te Mata, Te Uku, Waitetuna, Ruapuke. Growth based on the success of an event will always incur costs that requires further funding support e.g. film festival demand for further space/move to town hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwec | Global Wind Report
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT Annual market update 2010 Foreword 2010 was a tough year for our industry, and although We are still waiting for a resolution to the global debate on cumulative market growth was still a healthy 24.1 %, the climate change and we are still waiting for any signs of a annual market decreased for the first time in about two clear pathway towards a global price on carbon. If the pace decades. The medium term consequences of the financial of the international climate negotiations during 2010 is any crisis and the economic slowdown finally took their toll, indication, we are going to have to continue to wait for and very low orders in OECD countries at the end of 2008 some time. Hopes are higher for COP17 in Durban this year and the beginning of 2009 made themselves felt in the than they were for Cancun, but few observers expect final 2010 installation totals, particularly in the United States. resolutions to the fundamental unresolved issues. Having said that, 38.3 GW of new wind power capacity was We expect that by the time this report is printed global added around the world last year, and for the first time the installed capacity will have reached 200 GW. We estimate majority of that new capacity was in developing countries that this will double again within three to four years, and emerging economies; driven mainly by the booming keeping open the option to reach GWEC’s aspirational goal wind sectors in China and India, but also with strong of 1,000 GW of installed capacity by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Report 2010
    1 Meridian Energy EQUITY RESEARCH – New Zealand ANALYST FIRST NZ CAPITAL SECURITIES LIMITED IS A NZX FIRM Jason Lindsay +64 4 496 5338 [email protected] 29 October 2010 A valuation perspective PG 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Recent Performance .................................................................................................................................................................................3 Earnings Outlook ......................................................................................................................................................................................3 Base Case Valuation .................................................................................................................................................................................3 Key Assumptions.......................................................................................................................................................................................3 Sensitivity Analysis....................................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]