DOCSLIB.ORG

Valuation Report 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Meridian Energy EQUITY RESEARCH – New Zealand ANALYST FIRST NZ CAPITAL SECURITIES LIMITED IS A NZX FIRM Jason Lindsay +64 4 496 5338 [email protected] 29 October 2010 A valuation perspective PG 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Recent Performance .................................................................................................................................................................................3 Earnings Outlook ......................................................................................................................................................................................3 Base Case Valuation .................................................................................................................................................................................3 Key Assumptions.......................................................................................................................................................................................3 Sensitivity Analysis....................................................................................................................................................................................3 COMPANY PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Trends .......................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Sector Outlook ..........................................................................................................................................................................................4 Company Outlook.....................................................................................................................................................................................7 EARNINGS MODEL ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Earnings estimates....................................................................................................................................................................................8 Cash Flow Estimates ...............................................................................................................................................................................10 Balance Sheet .........................................................................................................................................................................................10 ASSUMPTIONS ADOPTED............................................................................................................................................... 13 Economic Assumptions ..........................................................................................................................................................................13 Sector Assumptions.................................................................................................................................................................................13 Specific Assumptions ..............................................................................................................................................................................14 Capex Assumptions.................................................................................................................................................................................15 DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW VALUATION .......................................................................................................................... 16 Cost of capital assumptions....................................................................................................................................................................16 Summary of DCF valuation.....................................................................................................................................................................17 Cash Flows for forecast horizon .............................................................................................................................................................17 Key Assumption Sensitivity.....................................................................................................................................................................18 COMPARISON OF DCF VALUATION WITH ALTERNATIVE VALUATION METHODS ............................................................ 19 Peer Company Analysis ..........................................................................................................................................................................19 Peer Company Analysis Commentary ....................................................................................................................................................20 APPENDIX 1................................................................................................................................................................... 21 PG 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recent Performance Meridian Energy’s underlying profit after tax increased by 29% in FY10 to NZ$251.9mn (from NZ$195mn) primarily as a result of an improved LWAP/GWAP factor, and above average storage and high inflows combined with some significant thermal plant outages resulting in a short period of higher wholesale electricity prices. EBITDAF increased by 25% in FY10 to NZ$641.7mn (from NZ$512.4mn). We estimate the lower LWAP/GWAP (load weighted average price to generated weighted average price) factor in FY10 (1.13x versus 1.24x in FY09) added close to NZ$70mn to EBITDAF (although this was mitigated by a return to more normal levels of constraint rental rebates). The full commissioning of the 143MW West Wind project added a further circa NZ$15m to EBITDAF (and would have been more under more normal wholesale electricity prices). Benefits from the cost out programme were also seen. EBITDAF/MWh increased 10.6% from NZ$41.87 to NZ$46.29. Earnings Outlook A large portion of the forecast EBITDAF growth in FY11 and FY12 is as a result of acquisitions/capex (primarily Mt Millar and Te Uku) in FY10 and FY11. A full year contribution from Mt Millar wind farm is expected in FY11 with first turbine commissioning of Te Uku wind farm expected late calendar year 2010 (partial contribution in FY11 and full contribution in FY12). The new NZAS agreement takes effect from 1 January 2013. We forecast a significant lift in earnings as a result (partially reflected in FY13 and the full impact in FY14). Meridian Energy faces a significant increase in HVDC charges as a result of the Transpower Pole 3 project costing up to NZ$670mn due for completion in 2012 (although they will benefit from a lower location factor). We forecast the construction of Central Wind (which is consented) in FY13 and FY14 with commissioning from FY15. We do not forecast any further developments beyond what has been consented. Base Case Valuation Our DCF valuation is based on forecasting Meridian Energy’s cash flow for a 10 year period. This derives an enterprise valuation of NZ$7,495mn and an equity value of NZ$6,276mn using a WACC of 8.6% and a terminal growth rate of 2.5%. Key Assumptions Our retail price path effectively preserves the current profitability of the retail division. We assume the first leg of carbon pricing (from 1 July 2010) is reflected in FY11 (first half) with the removal of the 50% free allocation on emissions from 31 December 2012 causing a further leg up in tariffs FY13 (back half). Intense retail competition and softer wholesale electricity prices in the short term (meaning retail is currently quite profitable) may result in a delay in processing the forecast tariff increases giving rise to downside risk to our forecasts. After lowering our short term wholesale price path to reflect softer hedge data, our wholesale price forecasts are now in line with Energy Hedge and ASX data through to FY15. MED forecasts are higher than our forecast price path in later years. We assume HVAC and HVDC percentage increases in line with Transpower forecasts and CPI and distribution system growth (1.5%) increases to lines company charges. Our long run generation assumptions are based on the 13 year average per Energy Link with 3% efficiency gains on Manapouri and Benmore following recent capital expenditure. Line losses and LWAP/GWAP are forecast in line with historic levels with an improvement the the LWAP/GWAP factor from FY13 following the commissioning of the upgraded HVDC link (Pole 3). We have attempted to unwind the NZAS estimated cash flows liability with reference to wholesale price path forecasts. Our analysis suggests the tariff is at a 19% discount to the forecast wholesale price path. Sensitivity Analysis Relative to others in the sector Meridian Energy is less sensitive to moves in retail tariffs (as a result of their smaller residential book relative to
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand, Tokyo, Japan

    Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand, Tokyo, Japan

    APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand Workshop on Grid Interconnection Issues for Renewable Energy 12 October, 2010 Tokyo, Japan RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Coverage Electricity Generation in New Zealand, The Electricity Market, Grid Connection Issues, Technical Solutions, Market Solutions, Problems Encountered Key Points. RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity in New Zealand 7 Major Generators, 1 Transmission Grid owner – the System Operator, 29 Distributors, 610 km HVDC link between North and South Islands, Installed Capacity 8,911 MW, System Generation Peak about 7,000 MW, Electricity Generated 42,000 GWh, Electricity Consumed, 2009, 38,875 GWh, Losses, 2009, 346 GWh, 8.9% Annual Demand growth of 2.4% since 1974 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Installed Electricity Capacity, 2009 (MW) Renew able Hydro 5,378 60.4% Generation Geothermal 627 7.0% Wind 496 5.6% Wood 18 0.2% Biogas 9 0.1% Total 6,528 73.3% Non-Renew able Gas 1,228 13.8% Generation Coal 1,000 11.2% Diesel 155 1.7% Total 2,383 26.7% Total Generation 8,91 1 100.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity Generation, 2009 (GWh) Renew able Hydro 23,962 57.0% Generation Geothermal 4,542 10.8% Wind 1,456 3.5% Wood 323 0.8% Biogas 195 0.5% Total 30,478 72.6% Non-Renew able Gas 8,385 20.0% Generation Coal 3,079 7.3% Oil 8 0.0% Waste Heat 58 0.1% Total 11,530 27.4% Total Generation 42,008 1 00.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity from Renewable Energy New Zealand has a high usage of Renewable Energy • Penetration 67% , • Market Share 64% Renewable Energy Penetration Profile is Changing, • Hydroelectricity 57% (decreasing but seasonal), • Geothermal 11% (increasing), • 3.5% Wind Power (increasing).
  • Meridian Energy

    Meridian Energy

    NEW ZEALAND Meridian Energy Performance evaluation Meridian Energy equity valuation Macquarie Research’s discounted cashflow-based equity valuation for Meridian Energy (MER) is $6,531m (nominal WACC 8.6%, asset beta 0.60, TGR 3.0%). Forecast financial model A detailed financial model with explicit forecasts out to 2030 has been completed and is summarised in this report. Inside Financial model assumptions and commentary Performance evaluation 2 We discuss a number of key model input assumptions in the report including: Valuation summary 6 Wholesale and retail electricity price paths; Financial model assumptions 8 Electricity purchase to sales price ratio pre and post the HVDC link upgrade; Financial statements summary 18 HVDC link charging regime; Financial flexibility and generation Electricity demand growth by customer type; development 21 The impact of the Electricity Industry Act (EIA) asset transfer and VAS’; Sensitivities 22 The New Zealand Aluminium Smelters (NZAS) supply contract; Alternative valuation methodologies 23 Relative disclosure 24 MER’s generation development pipeline. Appendix – Valuation Bridge 26 Equity valuation sensitivities are provided on key variables. Alternative valuation methodology We have assessed a comparable company equity valuation for the company of $5,179m-$5,844m. This is based on the current earnings multiples of listed comparable generator/retailers globally. This valuation provides a cross-check of the equity valuation based on our primary methodology, discounted cashflow. This valuation range lies below our primary valuation due, in part to the positive net present value of modelled development projects included in our primary valuation. Relative disclosure We have assessed the disclosure levels of MER’s financial reports and presentations over the last financial period against listed and non-listed companies operating in the electricity generation and energy retailing sector in New Zealand.
  • Meridian Energy

    Meridian Energy

    NEW ZEALAND Meridian Energy Performance evaluation Meridian Energy equity valuation Macquarie Research’s discounted cashflow-based equity valuation for Meridian Energy (MER) is $6,463m (nominal WACC 8.6%, asset beta 0.60, TGR 3.0%). We have assumed, in this estimate, that MER receives $750m for its Tekapo A and B assets. Forecast financial model Inside A detailed financial model with explicit forecasts out to 2030 has been completed and is summarised in this report. Performance evaluation 2 Financial model assumptions and commentary Valuation summary 5 We have assessed the sensitivity of our equity valuation to a range of inputs. Financial model assumptions and Broadly, the sensitivities are divided into four categories: generation commentary 7 assumptions, electricity demand, financial and price path. Financial statements summary 15 We highlight and discuss a number of key model input assumptions in the report: Financial flexibility and generation Wholesale electricity price path; development 18 Electricity demand and pricing; Sensitivities 19 The New Zealand Aluminium Smelters (NZAS) supply contract; Alternative valuation methodologies 20 Relative disclosure 21 MER’s generation development pipeline. Alternative valuation methodology We have assessed a comparable company equity valuation for the company of $4,942m-$6,198m. This is based on the current earnings multiples of listed comparable generator/retailers globally. This valuation provides a cross-check of the equity valuation based on our primary methodology, discounted cashflow. This valuation range lies below our primary valuation due, in part, to the recent de-rating of global renewable energy multiples (absolutely and vis-a-vis conventional generators). Relative disclosure We have assessed the disclosure levels of MER’s financial reports and presentations over the last financial period against listed and non-listed companies operating in the electricity generation and energy retailing sector in New Zealand.
  • Landscape & Visual Impact Part 5

    Landscape & Visual Impact Part 5

    Perception and Public Consultation SECTION 14 14.1 Perception People’s perception of wind farms is an important issue to consider as the attitude or opinion of individuals adds significant weight to the level of potential visual impact. The opinions and perception of individuals from the local community and broader area were sought and provided through a range of consultation activities. These included: • Community Open House Events; • Community Engagement Research (Telephone Survey); and • Individual stakeholder meetings. The attitudes or opinions of individuals toward wind farms can be shaped or formed through a multitude of complex social and cultural values. Whilst some people would accept and support wind farms in response to global or local environmental issues, others would find the concept of wind farms completely unacceptable. Some would support the environmental ideals of wind farm development as part of a broader renewable energy strategy but do not consider them appropriate for their regional or local area. It is unlikely that wind farm projects would ever conform or be acceptable to all points of view; however, research within Australia as well as overseas consistently suggests that the majority of people who have been canvassed do support the development of wind farms. Wind farms are generally easy to recognise in the landscape and to take advantage of available wind resources are more often located in elevated and exposed locations. The geometrical form of a wind turbine is a relatively simple one and can be visible for some distance beyond a wind farm, and the level of visibility can be accentuated by the repetitive or repeating pattern of multiple wind turbines within a local area.
  • Use Wind Intelligently. Live Sustain- Ability

    Use Wind Intelligently. Live Sustain- Ability

    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT USE WIND INTELLIGENTLY LIVE SUSTAINABILITY USE WIND INTELLIGENTLY. LIVE SUSTAIN- consolidated net profit 2017 in EUR million, ABILITY. 2016: EUR 141.8 million As a company that is fully aware of its responsi- bilities, through our wind energy systems we aim to contribute to climate-friendly energy gener- ation – and ensure sustainable thinking is em- bedded in all areas of our Company. installed capacity 2017 in MW, WE ARE NORDEX 2016: 2,622 MW THE NORDEX GROUP is one of the world’s lead- ing providers of high-performance wind power systems. The Group unites the two formerly in- dependent manufacturers – Acciona Windpower and Nordex – which complement each other per- fectly. Whereas Acciona Windpower generates employees 2017 at the reporting date, the majority of its revenues from major projects in growth markets, Nordex focuses its business 2016: 5,129 employees activities on Europe. By bundling these business activities, we cover around 90 percent of the markets (excluding China) for onshore systems. As both sections of our Company have different focus areas we can offer suitable wind turbines to meet very different requirements. Our manu- facturing network includes facilities in Germany, Spain, Brazil and India. In 2017 we also estab- lished a technology center in Denmark for rotor energy consumption per installed blade development. Nordex’s focus lies not only capacity 2017 in kWh / MW, on sustainable economic growth but also on 2016: 22,819 kWh / MW taking responsibility and countering the chal- lenges posed by climate change. Our Sustain- ability Strategy forms the foundation for our actions, entitled: ‘Use wind intelligently – live sustainability’.
  • Wind Farm Update April 2008.Pdf

    Wind Farm Update April 2008.Pdf

    April 2008 W NNDDFAARMRM ByUUPDATE Dr Julian Elder PDATE he decision on WEL Networks’ proposed wind farm at Te Uku is expected to be Tannounced by the Waikato District Council in the near future. Like you, we keenly await the outcome. I’m sending you this UPDATE to provide important background information as part of WEL’s commitment to on-going consultation with the greater Raglan community. The UPDATE forms no part of the resource consent process. The business case for the wind farm is strong and financially sound. Otherwise, we would not be risking an investment of $200 million, particularly when we are owned by the community. The Te Uku wind farm project will only go ahead if it is profitable. But we do acknowledge that there are residents with mixed feelings about the wind farm, and those who oppose it. The proposed wind farm is among the smaller of the wind farms either in operation or planned elsewhere in New Zealand. The generation of power to meet the growing demands of consumers and industry always presents a dilemma. New Zealanders are demanding renewable energy resources, yet at the same time they are demanding more supply. In the Waikato region, 55 percent more power will be needed in the next 10 years to meet the growth of both residential and business consumers. NO TO NUCLEAR POWER Coal fired power stations are being rejected and no-one supports nuclear power. Other ways to deliver power, such as bio mass, tidal and solar, are not currently realistic in commercial terms. Wind, as an energy resource, continues globally as the most widely accepted form of renewable and sustainable generation.
  • Kaimai Wind Farm Tourism and Recreation Impact Assessment

    Kaimai Wind Farm Tourism and Recreation Impact Assessment

    Kaimai Wind Farm Tourism and Recreation Impact Assessment REPORT TO VENTUS ENERGY LTD MAY 2018 Document Register Version Report date V 1 Final draft 31 August 2017 V2 GS comments 10 Oct 2017 V3 Visual assessment, cycle route 30 Nov 2017 V4 Updated visual assessment 16 February 2018 V5 Turbine update 30 May 2018 Acknowledgements This report has been prepared by TRC Tourism Ltd. Disclaimer Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith but on the basis that TRC Tourism is not liable to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to in this document. K AIMAI WIND FARM TOURISM AND RECREATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction and Background ........................................................................... 4 2 Existing Recreation and Tourism Setting ........................................................... 5 3 Assessment of Potential Effects ...................................................................... 12 4 Recommendations and Mitigation .................................................................. 18 5 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 20 K AIMAI WIND FARM TOURISM AND RECREATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT
  • Te Uku Wind Farm, Near Raglan, Are Finding Out

    Te Uku Wind Farm, Near Raglan, Are Finding Out

    new zealand wind energy association ›› www.windenergy.org.nz Wind Energy Case Study Business and community opportunities There is more to wind energy than wind turbines and renewable energy. A new wind farm can become a catalyst for business and community renewal, as the people involved with Te Uku wind farm, near Raglan, are finding out. Earthworks at Te Uku wind farm Out towards Raglan, Meridian Energy is developing a new wind “I was just a one-man band but I had to employ staff and learn all farm at Te Uku. This high and windy site has become an important about how to do that. It was a real eye opener but I had lots of help community asset. The wind farm has added a new, positive dynamic from the managers of the construction firms Hick Bros and Spartan to this isolated farming site. Construction,” says Jim. It was a very wet winter, which did not help, but Jim is proud of Business opportunities his contribution. “We all need power at the end of the day.” An important aspect of the construction and ongoing management Local Hamilton firm Spartan Construction together with Hick of the wind farm was that the existing farm operations had to Bros from Silverdale formed Hick Spartan Joint Venture and continue with little or no disruption. That meant that stock and won the contract to supply infrastructure roading, foundations pasture had to be managed along with heavy construction, quarrying and erosion and sediment control at Te Uku. They won the and new roading. Jim Munns, a local fencer played an integral role.
  • New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law

    New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato 179 Protection of Threatened Species in New Zealand Pip Wallace* and Shaun Fluker† The need to protect threatened species and facilitate their recovery to viable population levels enjoys widespread international support, but it is the domestic legal rules of individual nations that will implement international calls for protection and recovery. New Zealand purports to protect threatened species primarily with the Wildlife Act 1953, a statute whose purpose is more concerned with wildlife management than implementing a legal framework to protect threatened species. The consensus is that the Wildlife Act 1953 and other applicable legislation such as the Resource Management Act 1991 is not up to the task of protection and recovery of threatened species in New Zealand. In this article we explore how dedicated threatened species legislation in New Zealand might improve on the existing legal framework, and in particular with respect to the designation and planning on threatened species, recovery programmes and habitat protection. For an illustration of how these components may contribute to the threatened species problem we look to Canada as a nation which enacted dedicated threatened species legislation in 2002. The story thus far in Canada suggests legal rules are not a panacea for species decline, but nonetheless dedicated legislation can offer substantial benefits such as transparency and a systematic approach to species planning, better integration with resource development, and a measure of accountability in law to hold public officials to their promises on threatened species protection.
  • Use Wind Intelligently Live Sustainability

    Use Wind Intelligently Live Sustainability

    Use Wind Intelligently Live Sustainability SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 GLOBAL PRESENCE The Nordex Group’s key markets – read more on PAGE 06 2,459.1 SALES REVENUES 2018 in EUR million, 2017: EUR 3,077.8 million We Are Nordex GRI 102-2 For over three decades the development, manufacturing, 2,522 project execution and servicing of onshore wind power sys- INSTALLED CAPACITY 2018 tems have been the core competencies and the passion that in MW, 2017: 2,699 MW drive the Nordex Group and our approximately 5,600 employ- ees around the world. Under the brand names Acciona Wind- power and Nordex, the Company provides highly profitable, cost-efficient wind turbines that enable the long-term, eco- 5,676 nomically viable generation of electricity from wind power in all geographical and climatic conditions. EMPLOYEES 2018 at the reporting date, 2017: 5,260 employees By the end of 2018 we had installed over 25 GW of generat- ing capacity in a total of more than 40 countries. Our manu- facturing network includes facilities in Germany, Spain, Bra- zil and India. New production plants in Mexico and Argentina 27,519 will commence operations in 2019. ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER INSTALLED CAPACITY 2018 in kWh / MW, 2017: 29,306 kWh / MW Nordex not only focuses on sustainable economic growth but also on taking responsibility and countering the chal- lenges posed by climate change. Our Sustainability Strat- egy, entitled ‘Use wind intelligently – live sustainability’ forms the foundation for our actions. In this Sustainability 3,166 Report we present a detailed account of our economic, en- WASTE PER INSTALLED CAPACITY 2018 vironmental and societal commitment.
  • Meridian Energy Annual Report for Year Ended !" June #"$" How Much Power?

    Meridian Energy Annual Report for Year Ended !" June #"$" How Much Power?

    Meridian Energy Annual Report for year ended !" June #"$" How much power? Meridian is the largest state-owned electricity generator in New Zealand, providing around 30% of New Zealand's total generation. We also retail electricity to more than 180,000 residential, rural and business customers. NAME: CalRENEW!1 NO. OF PV PANELS: %",""" CAPACITY: %MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' # i NAME: Mt Millar3 NAME: Ross Island NO. OF TURBINES: !% NAME: Macarthur2 NO. OF TURBINES: ! CAPACITY: &"MW LOCATION: Victoria CAPACITY: $MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED STAGE: Pre-construction design !"##$%&#' $" CAPACITY: '#"MW NAME: Mt Mercer LOCATION: Victoria STAGE: Pre-construction design CAPACITY: $!"MW Front Cover: The Ross Island wind farm and Mt Erebus from Observation Hill, Antarctica. Courtesy of George Blaisdell, Antarctica NZ Pictorial Collection. NAME: Central Wind NAME: Te Āpiti STAGE: Consented NO. OF TURBINES: ## CAPACITY: !"$MW CAPACITY: '$MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' %"# TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##(%#$' %$' NAME: Ohau A NAME: Te Uku NO. OF GENERATORS: & STAGE: Under construction CAPACITY: ")&MW CAPACITY: )&MW NAME: West Wind TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !,!%& !"##$%&#' NO. OF TURBINES: )" NAME: Mill Creek TOTAL GWh PRODUCED '(% CAPACITY: !&%MW !"##(%#$' STAGE: Environment Court appeal TOTAL GWh PRODUCED &'* CAPACITY: )*MW !"##$%&#' TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##(%#$' %( NAME: Ohau B NAME: Mokihinui NO. OF GENERATORS: & STAGE: Environment Court appeal CAPACITY: "!"MW CAPACITY: (#MW NAME: Tekapo A TOTAL GWh PRODUCED '&( !"##$%&#' NO. OF GENERATORS: ! ii TOTAL GWh PRODUCED iii CAPACITY: !"##(%#$' (%& "#MW Brooklyn TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' !#" TOTAL GWh PRODUCED Wellington !"##(%#$' !"& NAME: Ohau C NO. OF GENERATORS: & CAPACITY: "!"MW NAME: Hurunui Wind TOTAL GWh PRODUCED STAGE: Consultation NAME: Tekapo B !"##$%&#' '&$ CAPACITY: *(MW NO. OF GENERATORS: " TOTAL GWh PRODUCED ("( !"##(%#$' Christchurch CAPACITY: !)$MW TOTAL GWh PRODUCED !"##$%&#' (!* TOTAL GWh PRODUCED (%% NAME: Benmore !"##(%#$' Twizel NAME: Hunter Downs Irrigation NO.
  • Meridian Energy to Partner with AGL in Developing Southern

    Meridian Energy to Partner with AGL in Developing Southern

    Meridian Energy to partner with AGL in developing Southern Hemisphere’s largest wind farm For immediate release: New Zealand's largest renewable electricity generator, Meridian, and Australia's largest renewable electricity generator AGL today announced the establishment of a joint venture to build what will be the southern hemisphere's biggest wind farm. The project is the 420 MW Macarthur wind farm in southwest Victoria. The final build cost will be around A$1 billion and is due for completion in 2013. Meridian’s 50 percent investment share in the project will be made through a combination of equity and project finance which will be sourced by the joint venture partners. Meridian chief executive Tim Lusk said today the investment was consistent with Meridian’s Australian wind investment strategy, which earlier this year saw the company acquire the 70 MW Mt Millar wind farm in South Australia. “The Macarthur project is a great opportunity to facilitate our growth ambitions in Australia. The project offers long term, reliable generation revenues which will complement the rest of Meridian’s developing Australian wind portfolio. The electricity purchase contracts have been structured in a way that the joint venture does not take market price or electricity production volume risk.” Mr Lusk said Macarthur cements a long term relationship between Meridian and AGL. “This joint venture between the largest renewable developers in New Zealand and Australia, each bringing complementary skill sets to the project, gives us great confidence that it will be delivered successfully. The good cultural fit evident between the parties creates ongoing opportunities for joint development.” As well as the Macarthur project and the Mt Millar wind farm, Meridian has a number of other high quality wind development sites in Australia.