Factors Affecting Attempts to Establish County-Wide Junior Colleges in Sparsely Populated Regions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Factors Affecting Attempts to Establish County-Wide Junior Colleges in Sparsely Populated Regions FACTORS AFFECTING ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH COUNTY-WIDE JUNIOR COLLEGES IN SPARSELY POPULATED REGIONS Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Snider, Richard Harlan, 1921- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 20:31:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/287524 This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-12,538 SNIDER, Richard Harlan, 1921- FACTORS AFFECTING ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH COUNTY-WIDE JUNIOR COLLEGES IN SPARSELY POPULATED REGIONS. University of Arizona, Ph.D., 1969 Education, administration University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan FACTORS AFFECTING ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH COUNTY-WIDE JUNIOR COLLEGES IN SPARSELY POPULATED REGIONS by Richard H. Snider A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1969 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: PREFACE This study was undertaken to analyze factors associated with the success and with the failure of attempts to establish public junior colleges in two large, sparsely populated counties in Arizona. Since much of the analysis was based on case studies of the two counties, an important aspect of the study was the presentation of the political history of the attempts to establish junior colleges in Cochise County, Arizona, between 1961 and 1962, and in Pinal County, Arizona, between 1961 and 1963. For their contributions toward the development of the study and for their specific suggestions, grateful acknowledgment is made to Dr. Lloyd E. McCann, Dr. Jerald L. Reece, and Dr. Marsden B. Stokes. Acknowledgment is also made to Dr. Oliver F. Sigworth and Dr. Alan E. Craven for their suggestions and cooperation. A special debt of gratitude is due Dr. John T. Greer for his important contributions to the design and development of the study, for his will­ ing cooperation under difficult circumstances, and finally for his constant encouragement. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter F>aSe LIST OF TABLES i* ABSTRACT xi I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Statement of the Problem 1 B. Importance of the Study 1 C. Literature Relevant to the Problem 4 Studies of the Founding of Junior Colleges 4 Studies of Public School Financial Elections ..... 6 Studies of Influences on Public Schools 9 Studies of Community Influence Structures 10 D. Summary 21 II. DESIGN OF THE STUDY 23 A. Limitations and Assumptions 23 B. Method of Collecting the Data 27 C. Presentation of the Findings 29 Hypotheses Examined 29 Organization of the Data 33 III. THE SUCCESSFUL ESTABLISHMENT OF A JUNIOR COLLEGE IN COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA, 1961-1962... 34 A. Geography, Population and Economy of Cochise County 35 B. The Movement to Establish a Junior College District 38 The Campaign for the Junior College District Election 43 The Results of the Election to Create the District . 45 iv V TABLE OF CON TENTS--Continued Page C. The Junior College Survey and Selection of a Site 46 Promotion of Sites by Community Leaders 47 Appointment of a Governing Board ...... ..... 49 Recommendations of the Survey Team 50 Selection of the College Site 53 D. Opposition to the Selected Site 56 Proposal of an Alternate Site 59 Restudy of the Site Problem 62 E. The Campaign for the Bond Election 68 F. The Success of the Bond Election 73 How Communities Voted . 73 Commentary on the Success of the Election 74 IV. THE UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT TO ESTABLISH A JUNIOR COLLEGE IN PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, 1961-1963 77 A. Geography, Population and Economy of Pinal County 78 B. The Movement to Establish a Junior College District 81 The Campaign for the Junior College District Election 86 The Results of the Election to Create the District 87 C. The Junior College Survey and Recommendation of a Site 88 Appointment of a Governing Board 90 Planning for the Survey 92 Indications of Opposition to the College . 94 First Election of the Governing Board 95 Commencement of the Feasibility Study 99 Dissatisfaction with the Survey Team's Approach 101 Completion of the Survey . 103 D. Controversy over the Finding of the Survey 104 Arguments Favoring the Recommended Site .... 107 Objections to the Survey Team's Methodology and Conclusions 108 Press Reactions to Criticisms of the Survey .... Ill Defense of Survey Team's Methodology 112 c vi TABLE OF CONTENTS--Continued Page Postponement and Restudy of Site Selection 114 Selection of the Junior College Site 120 E. The Campaign for the Bond Election a 122 Preparations to Promote the Bond Issue 124 Indications of Preparations to Oppose the Bond Issue .. 127 Failure of Proponents of the Bond Issue to Obtain Support 128 Organization of the Opposition . * 130 F. The Defeat of the Bond Proposal 137 How Communities Voted . 137 Commentary on the Defeat of the Bond Proposal. 138 V. GEOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC FACTORS IN RELATION TO JUNIOR COLLEGE ELECTION RESULTS IN THE TWO COUNTIES 143 A. Comparison of Population and Economic Characteristics . 143 B. Bond Election Results in Relation to Tax Rate, Distance from Site and the Establishment Election .. 146 Bond Election Results and Community Tax Rates and Assessed Valuations 146 Bond Election Results and Community Distances from College Sites 148 Bond Election Results and Community Vote in Election Creating the Districts 150 C. Summary . 158 VI. ANALYSIS OF ASPECTS OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDIES . 161 A. Comparison of the Scope, Content, and Objectives of the Published Surveys 161 Projections of the Educational Program in the Surveys 162 Discussions of the Purposes of a Junior College . 164 Examinations of Employment and Population Characteristics 165 Projections of High School Graduates and College Enrollments 169 vii TABLE OF CON TENTS- -Continue d Page General Treatment of Data in the Surveys 172 Site Recommendations of the Surveys 173 B. Analysis of Aspects of the Surveys as Targets for Criticism 175 Targets for Criticism in the Pinal Survey 175 Targets for Criticism in the Cochise Survey ....... 181 C. The Surveys as Documents with Potential Political Implications 185 VII. SOCIAL FACTORS IN RELATION TO THE SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF THE JUNIOR COLLEGE ELECTIONS A. Methods Employed in the Two Counties in the Attempt to Establish Junior Colleges 189 Differences in the Organization of Junior College Proponents .. 191 Differences in Large Community Promotion of the Junior Colleges ............ 193 Differences in Techniques Employed in Promoting the Bond Issues 195 Differences in the Conduct of the Feasibility Studies 197 B. The Influence of Community Leaders during the Establishment Processes 199 The Role of Influential Individuals in the County Where the Bond Election Succeeded 201 The Role of Influential Individuals in the County Where the Bond Election Failed 207 Comparison of the Power Structures in Relation to the Junior College Bond Elections 215 VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A. Summary 220 B. Conclusions 234 Examination of Specific Hypotheses 235 Implications 244 viii TABLE OF CON TENTS- -Continued Page APPENDICES 250 A. Provisions of the I960 Arizona Junior College Legislation Pertaining to the Establishment of New Junior Colleges 251 B. Projections of Pinal County and Cochise County High School Graduates Compared to Experience .... 255 C. Elements in the Pinal County Survey Which Affected Projections of Potential College Enrollments According to Location of the Proposed Institution ... 259 D. Interview Procedures 265 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 270 LIST OF TABLES Tables Page I. Employment by Category in Cochise and Pinal Counties, Arizona, April, 1961 . 145 II. Junior College Bond Election Vote in Relation to 1961 Tax Rates and Per Capita Assessed Valuations in High School Districts in Two Counties 147 III. Bond Election Vote and Distance to Proposed Sites of Pinal and Cochise County Communities 149 IV. Comparison of Community Vote in Junior College Establishment and Bond Elections in Cochise and Pinal Counties, 1961-1963 152 V. Percentage of 1961 Registered Voters Casting Ballots in Junior College Establishment and Bond Elections, Pinal and Cochise Counties, Arizona, 1961-1963 154 VI. Junior College and High School Bond Election Results of Selected Pinal County and Cochise County Communities, 1955 to 1965 . 156 VII. Influential Persons in the County with a Successful Bond Election as Choices of Eighteen Identified Leaaders .... 202 VIII. Influential Persons in the County with an Unsuccessful Bond Election as Choices of Twenty-two Identified Leaders . 208 IX. Actual Graduates
Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    A NPS Form 10-900 : OMB No.. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) I T""'""""" United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individu|l^open)j^Kafef dfet«ctS)jvSeeYnstructioris in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form*1! N^Lir>H^gBB^^Bialtoto^^A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information "^..^O+QH iton^im 1 ; ^ ;W'Y to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials., and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name: Paramount Theatre other names/site number. Casa Grande 1982 Inventory No. CG-150 2. Location street & number: 420 North Florence Street not for publication: _N/A_ city or town: Casa Grande vicinity: _N/A_ state: Arizona code: AZ county: Pinal code: 021 zip code: 85222 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • AZ Bibliography.Pdf (11.20Mb)
    17 September 2000 Memorandum To: Mary Ochs, Mann Library, Cornell University Fr: Doug Jones, Science-Engineering Lib, Univ of Arizona Su: Final Arizona bibliography for tJSAININEH project Enclosed is a copy ofthe final bibliography with average rank values attached consisting of 1150 items. 1. Book 1908 directory of Phoenix and the Salt River Valley including Tempe and Mesa, territory of Arizona: embracing a directory of the residents of Phoenix and additions, Tempe and Mesa, rural free delivery routes, giving their names, residence and business addresses, and occupations, together with a classified business directory: it contains a guide to the streets, halls, churches, lodges, schools, city, county, and territorial governments, etc., also data concerning the history, advantages, and existing conditions of Phoenix, Tempe and Mesa, and the great Salt RiverValley .Directory oiPhoenix and the Salt River Valley. Genealogy and local history; LH11624. 371 pages. Phoenix, Ariz.Phoenix Directory Co.8. OCLCIRLIN #: 39506270 . Catalog: OCLC. Holdings: Primary Location: No Holdings. Preservation & Microfilming Notes: Microfiche. Ann Arbor, Mich. : OMI, 1998.5 microfiche; 11 x 15 cm. (Genealogy and local history; LHl1624). Call #: No Information. Phoenix (Ariz.) -- Directories/Tempe (Ariz.) -- Directories/Mesa (Ariz.) -- Directories. Salt River Valley (Ariz.) -- Directories. Average Rank: 3.5. 2. Book Salt River Valley Water Users' Association.Agreement by and between Salt River Valley Water Users' Association and Local Union B-226 of Phoenix ofInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers A pages. Phoenix, Arizona?41. OCLCIRLIN #: 24866743. Catalog: OCLC. Holdings: Primary Location: AZP. Call #: 331.881 S17. Labor Laws and legislation - ArizonalTrade Unions - Arizona. Average Rank: 2.75. 3. Book Central Arizona Project Association, Phoenix, Arizona.The amazing story of Colorado River water in the Imperial Valley of California.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Session June 24, 2015 a Video Recording of This Meeting And
    Regular Session June 24, 2015 A video recording of this meeting and presentations can be viewed at www.pinalcountyaz.gov The Pinal County Board of Supervisors convened at 9:36 A.M. this date in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, 135 N. Pinal Street, Florence, Arizona. The meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Chase followed by an Invocation by Chaplain Michael Whitaker and the Pledge of Allegiance. Present: Chairwoman Cheryl Chase; Vice-Chairman Pete Rios; Supervisor Stephen Q. Miller; Supervisor Todd House; County Manager, Greg Stanley; Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, Chris Keller; Clerk of the Board, Sheri Cluff, and Assistant to the Clerk of the Board, Diane Gardner. Supervisor Anthony Smith was absent. Call to Public Barry McCain, Arizona City, appeared before the Board and expressed his satisfaction with the Board of Supervisors and stated that they have served the people well. David Coward, Gold Canyon, addressed the Board regarding Highway 60 and the fact that it is designated the Jefferson Davis Memorial Highway. He asked that the Board consider taking that designation off the highway. Chairwoman Chase asked staff to look into that and Supervisor Rios recommended to staff that they relay the request to the State. U.S. 60 is a state highway and comes under the jurisdiction of the State of Arizona. Tom Bean, Casa Grande, appeared before the Board regarding an article wherein the County Attorney stated marijuana dispensaries hurt Pinal County. Mr. Bean feels medical marijuana dispensaries help Pinal County and when opened, you have less of a criminal element. He does not feel the County Attorney is helping the Board make correct decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT October 2008 G E N E R a L P L a N 2 0 G E N R a L P
    EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT October 2008 G e n e r a l P l a n 2 0 G e n r a l P Existing Conditions Report acknowledgements City Council Members Robert “Bob” Jackson, Mayor Dick Powell, Mayor Pro Temp Matt Herman, Council Member Mary Kortsen, Council Member Steve Miller, Council Member Karl Montoya, Council Member Ralph Varela, Council Member City Administration James “Jim” Thompson, City Manager Larry Rains, Deputy City Manager Brett Wallace, City Attorney Mark Graffius, Assistant City Attorney Richard Rosales, Webmaster Planning and Zoning Commission Timothy Lee, Chairman Tina Cramp, Vice-Chairman Esther S. Halloran Sandra C. Hennessey John Klein Gordon L. Nedom Norman D. Sam Planning and Development Department Rick Miller, AICP, Planning Director Leila DeMaree, Senior Planner Benjamin Bitter, Management Analyst Laura Blakeman, Planner Carl Metz, Planner Keith Newman, Planner Melanie Podolak, Administrative Assistant G.I.S. Division Aaron Card, GIS Analyst Jon Colton, GIS Technician James Redd, GIS Technician G e n e r a l P l a n 2 0 G e n r a l P Existing Conditions Report OCT ‘08 General Plan Steering Forum Barry Albrecht, Executive Director, CAREDF Christopher Cacheris, Vice President, Harvard Investments Delia Carlyle, Chairperson, Ak-Chin Indian Community Cindy Compton, Resident and business owner Tina Cramp, Vice Chairperson, City of Casa Grande Planning and Zoning Commission Dr. Frank Davidson, Superintendent of Schools, Casa Grande Elementary School District J. Marty Dernier, President & CEO, Casa Grande Regional Medical Center
    [Show full text]
  • We Did It, Casa Grande!
    Sunday, April 7, 2019 | Casa Grande Valley Newspapers Inc. | NEON SIGN PARK — 1 We did it, Casa Grande! GRAND OPENING: Saturday, April 13, 2019 2 — NEON SIGN PARK | Casa Grande Valley Newspapers Inc. | Sunday, April 7, 2019 The Significance Of Highway 84 The popularity of Route 66 is well known. Our area of the state had Highway 84, often State Route 84 signage referred to locally as the Old Tucson Highway. (prior to 1942). Although less famous than Route 66, it arguably was more important. This all-weather southern State Route 84 signage route carried many more vehicles to California (after 1942). than did the “Mother Road”, as a short cut for through traffic between San Diego and Tucson Until 1942, the state route marker signs traveling U.S. Highway 80. Presently, it’s a short connecting road contained a Native American swastika, but between Casa Grande and Interstate 8. The they were removed after the US entry into road was first designated as a state highway World War II against Nazi Germany which Burma-Shave Signs in 1927 from Tucson to Picacho. In 1928 it came had a reversed swastika as its emblem. Burma-Shave was an American brand through Casa Grande and on to Gila Bend by 1930. of brushless shaving cream, famous for its Highway 84 originally came through Casa reveal their latest art project in the downtown. advertising gimmick of posting humorous Grande on Main Street and what is now known The history of Top and Bottom Street, the history rhyming poems on small sequential highway as Jimmie Kerr Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A)
    NPS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service DEC 0 9 ZOOS National Register of Historic Places NAT. REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Registration Form NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property______________________________________________________ Historic name Evergreen Addition Historic District________________________________________ Other names/site number 2. Location Generally Bounded by McMurray Blvd,Gilbert Ave, Florence Blvd, and street & number Casa Grande Ave. N/A not for publication city or town Casa Grande _____ N/A vicinity State Arizona code county Pinal code 027 zip code 85222 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this El nomination Q request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Histapc Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ffyneets Q doe^,not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 69-12,538 SNIDER, Richard Harlan, 1921- FACTORS AFFECTING
    FACTORS AFFECTING ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH COUNTY-WIDE JUNIOR COLLEGES IN SPARSELY POPULATED REGIONS Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Snider, Richard Harlan, 1921- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 09:10:33 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/287524 This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-12,538 SNIDER, Richard Harlan, 1921- FACTORS AFFECTING ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH COUNTY-WIDE JUNIOR COLLEGES IN SPARSELY POPULATED REGIONS. University of Arizona, Ph.D., 1969 Education, administration University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan FACTORS AFFECTING ATTEMPTS TO ESTABLISH COUNTY-WIDE JUNIOR COLLEGES IN SPARSELY POPULATED REGIONS by Richard H. Snider A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1969 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, C
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, C Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) C Cababi Mining District 34:121-22, 136 Caballero, Andres Arias 44:56, 57, 59, 67 Caballero, Carlos 31:176 photo of 31:176 Caballero, Gerarda See Serrano, Gerarda Caballero, José 46:172, 173, 175 Caballero, Juan 46:165 Caballero, Lucia (Chamorro) 46:173 Caballero, Luisa (Chamorro) 46:165 Caballeros Club, (Tucson) 31:173 “Caballero’s Way,” by Richard A. Summers, discussed 35:243, 248 Cabat-Gill Agency 28:152 n. 8 Cabaza de Vaca, Alvar Nunez, book about, reviewed 45:307-8 Cabell, DeRosey 51:17-21, 23 Cabell, DeRoy C. 46:356 2nd Punitive Expedition 7:130 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, C Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 Cabeza de Vaca, Àlvar Núñez 53:41 book about, reviewed 54:234 Cabeza Prieta 36:242 map of 36:240-41 Cabezon (Cahuilla leader) 37:136, 138 Cabezón, José 19:317, 319-20 Cabezón, Pisago (Apache Warrior) 27:49-50 n. 3 Cabinet Saloon (Prescott) 51:252, 254 Caborca Mission 9:128, 130 n. 29, 132 n. 36, 133 Caborca, Sonora 28:115, 132 n. 30; 31:120; 34:293, 295, 301; 35:144; 37:369; 39:386, 390 n. 5 and Crabbes filibuster 7:139-42 and Crabb Filibustering Expedition 34:234, 246, 258-60 and Pima Indian uprising 34:297, 300 Caborca-Sonoyta road 35:151 Cabórica, Sonora 34:288 Cabo San Lucas, Baja California 40:49 Cabot family 43:209 Cabot, Susan 54:82 Cabot, Thomas D.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Kit 10-11-16.Indd
    The key to reaching Pinal County’s rapidly-growing population Located between Phoenix and Tucson To Phoenix We of er Dispatch customer solutions to reach Saver our market. ARIZONA REAL E STATE BUYERS’ GUIDE Properties and Services To Tucson Our publications cover an area of more than 140 miles from east to west and 50 miles from north to south, a dynamic area in Pinal County, Arizona’s third most populous with more than 400,000 residents. No one else covers this area like we do. People are engaged in diverse occupations such as manufacturing, farming, cattle ranching, retail and tourism, and travel I-10 for entertainment and shopping. Our group of ers an ideal opportunity to blanket the entire market or target specii c communities. Casa Grande Valley Newspapers Inc. GENERAL OFFICES & MAILING ADDRESS DISPLAY ADVERTISING 200 W. 2nd St., Casa Grande, AZ 85122 408 N. Sacaton St. (520) 426-3814 NEARLY 1 MILLION PAGE VIEWS EACH MONTH! Our publications of er paid and free distribution opportunities Food is focus of upcoming Coffee with a Cop helps CGPD’s Zonta Club gala | 7A community relationship | 6A Published WEDNESDAY Dispatch OCTOBER 12, 2016 Tuesday through Sunday Mornings SERVING PINAL COUNTY FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY NO. 244 VOL. 105 TriValleyCentral.com 50 CENTS MISUSE OF RICO FUNDS Chief deputy in Pima The New Audit Bureau of Circulations indicted Solution Allegations similar Our morning motor routes not only reach toCasa those in PinalGrande, but all points in between in the Casa Grande Valley. to drought Staff and Wire Reports UCSON — A chief deputy with the P ffice has resigned after b TOTAL AVERAGE CIRCULATIONions of misu SundayDaily 8,0337,646 The Dispatch focuses on local, county■ and state news in addition to Associated Press articles from around■ the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Session April 20, 2016 a Video Recording of This Meeting And
    Regular Session April 20, 2016 A video recording of this meeting and presentations can be viewed at www.pinalcountyaz.gov The Pinal County Board of Supervisors convened at 9:30 A.M. this date in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, 135 N. Pinal Street, Florence, Arizona. The meeting was called to order by Chairman House followed by an Invocation by Chaplain Del Budke and the Pledge of Allegiance. Present: Chairman Todd House; Vice-Chairman Anthony Smith; Supervisor Pete Rios; Supervisor Cheryl Chase; Supervisor Stephen Q. Miller; County Manager, Greg Stanley; Chief Civil Deputy County Attorney, Chris Keller; Clerk of the Board, Sheri Cluff and Assistant to the Clerk of the Board, Diane Gardner. Call to the Public - David Frie, Casa Grande, spoke regarding accusations made in the Casa Grande Dispatch against the Sheriff and his Chief Deputy. Mr. Frie felt the County Board of Supervisors should request the Arizona Attorney General do an investigation into the matter. Brandon Irish, Maricopa, spoke regarding his war on corruption on every level in the country. He expressed his dissatisfaction with Electrical District 3 and also Pinal County Animal Care and Control. Roberto Reveles, Gold Canyon, spoke regarding Pinal County Policy and Procedure 1.30 governing the political activity of Pinal County Employees. Mr. Reveles stated that Steve Henry was in violation of Policy 1.30 governing all County Employees. Presentation of Certificates of Service to employees for 20, 25 and 30 years of service. Greg Stanley, County Manager, presented Certificates of Service to Denise Keller, Library, 20 years; Gilbert Tarango, Public Works, 25 years; Laura Miller, Court Administration, 25 years; Jo A.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Files: Subject Files: "A"S Abortion
    Vertical Files: Subject Files: "A"s Abortion Accountancy, Board of Adams Digging Adamsville Adjunctant General Administration, Arizona State Department of Adobe House - Florence Adobe Mountain Railroad Park - Glendale Adobe Mountain Rifle Range ADONDE African American Multicultural Museum - Scottsdale AFSCME Agriculture - Clippings Agriculture - Articles, Newsletters, Press Releases Agriculture - Clippings Agriculture and Horticulture, Arizona Commission of Agribusiness Agricultural Inspection Stations Agua Caliente 1 Agua Caliente 2 - Brochures Agua Fria Freddie Agua Fria Conservation Area Agua Fria National Monument Agua Fria Watercourse AHCCCS - Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Ahwatukee (Phoenix) AIMS Test Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Air Crash - KC135A Jet Tanker & Small Plane Collide - Perryville (March 3, 1982) Air Force Bases Air Products Chandler Air Quality Air Transportation, Aviation & Airports Airlines Crash over Grand Canyon - June 30, 1965 Airplane House - Phoenix Ajo 1 - Clippings Ajo 2 - Pamphlets, Brochures, Memos to Governor Thomas Campbell Ak-Chin Indian Community Ak-Chin Him-Dak Eco Museum - Maricopa Al Qaeda in Arizona Alamo Dam Alamo Wildlife Area (including Alamo Lake) Alexandra (Yavapai County) Alfalfa Algodones Land Grant Alhambra Village - Phoenix Alien Trust Law - Japanese Alliant Techsystems (ATK) - Mesa Alpacas Alpine Alson House - Mesa Alternate Project Delivery Method (APDM) Aho Ambassador Manor - Phoenix Amendments to U.S. Constitution by Arizona America West Arena American Association of
    [Show full text]
  • History of FPC the First 120 Years, by Bill Heinle, 2016 in 1896 the Community of Casa Grande Numbered About 350 Souls, and on May 3Rd of That Year It Was Official
    History of FPC The First 120 Years, by Bill Heinle, 2016 In 1896 the community of Casa Grande numbered about 350 souls, and on May 3rd of that year it was official. Casa Grande and Arizola had their very first Protestant church, named Endeavor Church. It was the eleventh Presbyterian congregation to be organized in the Arizona Territory. Dr. Augustus E. Marden, a well-known physician, and L. C. Butler, an agent for Southern Pacific Railroad, were the first two elders to be ordained. The Arizona Republican stated at the time, “We believe a large future opens before this church, which starts out well and comes at a time when interest of the community is aroused on matters of religion and the advantages of having a church organization in their midst.” Two years before, Rev. Henry A. Thompson, began laying the ground work for a new church. He had a circuit of preaching spots at Arizola, Casa Grande and Maricopa all along the Southern Pacific Railroad main line. He traveled from one point to the next via handcar. The first meetings of the church were held in the first adobe schoolhouse First Adobe Schoolhouse located near present day Elliott Park. The first church building was erected in 1899 at the southwest corner of Florence Street and 1st Avenue from an icehouse that was disassembled in Florence and reconstructed into a two-room church building dubbed “The Little White Church.” There was one good sized room where services were held and a smaller supply room. There was no electricity in the building until many years later.
    [Show full text]