Article Integrating Hot and Cool Intelligences: Thinking Broadly about Broad Abilities W. Joel Schneider 1,*, John D. Mayer 2 and Daniel A. Newman 3 1 Department of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA 2 Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire at Durham, Durham, NH 03824, USA;
[email protected] 3 Department of Psychology and School of Labor & Industrial Relations, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA;
[email protected] * Correspondence:
[email protected]; Tel.: +1-309-438-8410 Academic Editor: Robert J. Sternberg Received: 8 July 2015; Accepted: 22 January 2016; Published: 30 January 2016 Abstract: Although results from factor-analytic studies of the broad, second-stratum abilities of human intelligence have been fairly consistent for decades, the list of broad abilities is far from complete, much less understood. We propose criteria by which the list of broad abilities could be amended and envision alternatives for how our understanding of the hot intelligences (abilities involving emotionally-salient information) and cool intelligences (abilities involving perceptual processing and logical reasoning) might be integrated into a coherent theoretical framework. Keywords: emotional intelligence; personal intelligence; hot intelligences; broad abilities; Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities E. O. Wilson [1] argued that scientists should work toward achieving a consilient integration of theories across diverse domains of human knowledge. In this article, we work on an admittedly smaller integration—but one that, someday might contribute to the whole: an integration of the concepts of cool and hot intelligences. Over the 20th century, most commonly studied intelligences concerned the cool, impersonal features of information.