For Postcapitalist Studies: Inheriting Futures of Space and Economy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Alhojärvi — For Postcapitalist Studies: Inheriting Futures of Space and Economy Inheriting Futures Studies: Alhojärvi Postcapitalist — For 50:2 Tuomo Alhojärvi is a geographer immersed in postcapitalist praxis. In this study, he seeks to negotiate problematic legacies within the thinking of ‘other worlds’ by bringing together JK Gibson- Graham’s feminist economic geography and Jacques Derrida’s deconstructive philosophical practice. From this meeting emerges a fresh challenge for renegotiating the inherited futures of space and economy. Postcapitalism becomes a code word for trouble. In addition to thinking impossible things, Tuomo is keen on fathering, running and vermicomposting. nordia geographical publications 50:2 publications geographical nordia University of Oulu Graduate School For Postcapitalist Studies: Publication of The Geographical Society of Northern Finland & Inheriting Futures of Geography Research Unit at University of Oulu Space and Economy ISBN 978-952-62-2868-6 (print) ISBN 978-952-62-2869-3 (online) Tuomo Alhojärvi PunaMusta Oy 2021 nordia geographical publications volume 50 issue 2 For Postcapitalist Studies: Inheriting Futures of Space and Economy Tuomo Alhojärvi Academic dissertation to be presented with the permission of the Doctoral Training Committee for Human Sciences of the University of Oulu Graduate School (UniOGS) for public discussion in the lecture hall L10 on the 30th of March 2021 at 12. Supervised by Professor Anssi Paasi University of Oulu Finland Reviewed by Professor Associate Professor Clive Barnett Ceren Özselçuk University of Exeter Boğaziçi University United Kingdom Turkey Opponent Senior Lecturer Mitch Rose Aberystwyth University United Kingdom Nordia Geographical Publications is a publication of The Geographical Society of Northern Finland and Geography Research Unit at the University of Oulu. Address: PO Box 3000 FIN-90014 University of Oulu. Web: www.nordia.journal.fi. Editor-in-chief: Ville Kellokumpu [email protected]. Layout editor: Maija Toivanen. Cover and layout design: Maija Toivanen. Back cover photo: Aron Sandell. ISBN 978-952-62-2868-6 (print) ISBN 978-952-62-2869-3 (online) ISSN 1238-2086 (print) ISSN 2736-9722 (online) Printed at PunaMusta Oy, Joensuu, 2021 Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Tiivistelmä .................................................................................................................................. 7 Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction: Inheriting Ruins ........................................................................................... 13 1.1 A Postcapitalist Fold: Inheriting the Ruins of Future ......................................... 13 1.2 Capitalocentrism: Prismatic Economies of JK Gibson-Graham ..................... 16 1.3 Inheritance: Parasitic Legacies of Jacques Derrida .............................................. 28 1.4 Research Questions ................................................................................................... 39 1.5 Choreography ............................................................................................................ 45 2 Critical Gibson-Graham: Reading Capitalocentrism for Trouble ................................ 48 2.1 From Critique to Affirmation (and Back Again?) ............................................... 48 2.2 The Problem of Capitalocentrism .......................................................................... 52 2.3 Post/Critical Trajectories: Taming Capitalocentrism ........................................... 58 2.4 Reading Capitalocentrism for Trouble ................................................................... 65 2.5 Troubles We Therefore Inherit ............................................................................... 74 3 Archives of Violence: Capitalocentrism and the Grain of History ............................. 77 3.1 The Trouble with/in Postcapitalist Archives ........................................................ 77 3.2 The Hegemony of Capitalocentric Violence ........................................................ 79 3.3 Memories of Violence: Demanding History ........................................................ 88 3.3.1 Economy of Violence ................................................................................ 89 3.3.2 Aneconomy of Memory: The ‘Origins’ of Namelessness ................... 94 3.3.3 Demanding History: Of Responses .......................................................100 3.4 Violence, Our Memory ..........................................................................................103 3.4.1 With/in Violence: Brushing Against History’s Grain ........................104 3.4.2 Diverse (An)economies of Memory ......................................................108 3.4.3 Remembering Postcapitalist Promises ...................................................113 4 Postscripting Capitalism: Capitalocentric Remains and the Trouble of Postisms ..... 118 4.1 In the Fold: Post/Capitalism ................................................................................118 4.2 Postcapitalism (As We Already Knew It) ............................................................122 4.2.1 Capitalocentric Realism ............................................................................123 4.2.2 Symmetry of Isms: The Present ..............................................................126 4.2.3 Post/Capitalism: Temporal Rupture ......................................................128 4.2.4 Scalarisms: Vertical Orders ......................................................................131 4.2.5 Postisms: Economies of Performatives ................................................135 4.3 A Postcapitalist Politics ..........................................................................................140 4.3.1 Situatedness: Knowing Partially ..............................................................141 4.3.2 Landscaping Diversity ..............................................................................143 4.3.3 Postutopian Temporality .........................................................................147 4.3.4 Mediacy as Topology ................................................................................151 4.3.5 Any Whereness: A Postcapitalist Pedagogy ..........................................155 4.4 For Postcapitalist Studies .......................................................................................156 5 Jälkiä…: Economies of Language in Translation .........................................................160 5.1 Binds of Language ..................................................................................................160 5.2 The Troubling Mediacy of Language .................................................................162 5.3 Translation Spaces ...................................................................................................166 5.4 Translation Economises .........................................................................................171 5.4.1 Pericapitalism and Supply Chain Translations ......................................172 5.4.2 Untranslatables and Globality .................................................................175 5.4.3 Translations of Capitalist Modernity .....................................................180 5.5 Returns: Taking Back Translational Economies .................................................186 5.5.1 Elävä Talous: Translating Take Back the Economy ...................................187 5.5.2 Ongelma: The Problem of Opacity ..........................................................192 5.5.3 Jälkiä: Tracing the Olfactory of Capital(ism) ........................................199 6 Conclusion: Raising the Stakes ........................................................................................208 References ..............................................................................................................................217 Abstract The worldwide social and ecological unravelling of the 21st century presents an unprecedented challenge for thinking and practising liveable economies. As life support systems are annihilated in view of the sustainable accumulation of capital, social and economic alternatives are rapidly emerging to shelter possibilities for life amidst the ruins. Postcapitalism has gained increasing attention as an invitation to amplify existing alternatives to systemic scale. The transformations required are the focus of social movements, political projects and academic research that demand the theorisation and organisation of alternatives to capitalist realism today. What has often received less attention is how such emancipatory alternatives are burdened with problematic legacies living on within, in the epistemic heritage enabling and organ- ising societal transformation. The ‘post-’ prefix, and the break from capitalism that it announces, has largely been treated as a given. This study resists such temptations of the affirmative in order to ask how restrictive and counterproductive burdens are carried along in emancipatory thought and practice, and how their continuous negotiation might have to redefine postcapitalism itself. Taking the ‘post-’ seriously demands critical and theoretical skills capable of examining the