Convention on the Rights of the Child

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Convention on the Rights of the Child UNITED NATIONS CRC Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/ROM/4 18 November 2008 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Third and fourth periodic reports of States parties due in 2007 * ** ROMANIA [1 November 2007] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. ** Annexes can be consulted in the files of the Secretariat. GE.08-45181 (E) 191108 181208 CRC/C/ROM/4 page 2 CONTENTS Chapter Paragraphs Page Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 - 7 6 I. GENERAL MEASURES OF IMPLEMENTATION ....................... 8 - 156 7 II. DEFINITION OF THE WORD “CHILD” ........................................ 157 - 204 31 III. GENERAL PRINCIPLES ................................................................. 205 - 285 38 A. Non-discrimination .................................................................... 228 - 259 41 B. Best interests of the child ........................................................... 260 - 267 45 C. The right to life, survival and development ............................... 268 - 276 47 D. Respect for the views of the child .............................................. 277 - 285 48 IV. CIVIL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ................................................. 286 - 447 49 A. Name and nationality ................................................................. 286 - 301 49 B. Preservation of identity .............................................................. 302 - 329 51 C. Freedom of expression ............................................................... 330 - 353 54 D. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion ............................ 354 - 364 57 E. Freedom of association and peaceful assembly ......................... 365 - 367 58 F. Protection of privacy .................................................................. 368 - 383 59 G. Access to appropriate information ............................................. 384 - 387 60 H. The right not be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishment, including corporal punishment .................................................. 388 - 447 61 V. FAMILY ENVIRONMENT AND ALTERNATIVE CARE ............ 448 - 719 70 A. Parental guidance ....................................................................... 448 - 455 70 B. Parental responsibilities ............................................................. 456 - 487 85 C. Separation from parents ............................................................. 488 - 563 76 D. Family reunification ................................................................... 564 - 576 85 CRC/C/ROM/4 page 3 CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Paragraphs Page E. Recovery of maintenance for the child ...................................... 577 - 582 87 F. Children deprived of a family environment .............................. 583 - 621 88 G. Adoption .................................................................................... 622 - 644 95 H. Illicit transfer and non-return ..................................................... 645 - 674 100 I. Abuse and neglect, including physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration ............................................... 675 - 707 103 J. Periodic review of placement .................................................... 708 - 719 108 VI. BASIC HEALTH AND WELFARE ................................................. 720 - 897 109 A. Survival and development ......................................................... 720 - 725 109 B. Children with disabilities ........................................................... 726 - 766 110 C. Health and health services ......................................................... 767 - 852 117 D. Social security and childcare services and facilities .................. 853 - 890 138 E. Standard of living ...................................................................... 891 - 897 144 VII. EDUCATION, LEISURE AND CULTURAL ACTIVITIES .......... 898 - 1020 145 A. Education, including vocational training and guidance ............. 898 - 974 145 B. Aim of education with reference also to quality of education .................................................................................... 975 - 985 162 C. Rest, leisure, recreation and cultural and artistic activities ....... 986 - 1020 164 VIII. SPECIAL PROTECTION MEASURES ........................................... 1021 - 1400 169 A. Children in situation of emergency ........................................... 1021 169 1. Refugee children ................................................................ 1022 - 1094 169 2. Children in armed conflicts, including physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration ............... 1095 - 1103 179 CRC/C/ROM/4 page 4 CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Paragraphs Page B. Children in conflict with the Law .............................................. 1104 - 1129 181 1. The administration of juvenile justice ............................... 1130 - 1137 184 2. Children deprived of their liberty, including any form of detention, imprisonment or placement in custodial settings ............................................................................... 1138 - 1144 185 3. The sentencing of juveniles, in particular the prohibition of capital punishment and life imprisonment .................... 1145 187 4. Physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration ....................................................................... 1146 - 1162 187 C. Children in situation of exploitation, including the physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration ................. 1163 - 1357 189 1. Economical exploitation, including child labour ............... 1163 - 1173 189 2. Drug abuse ......................................................................... 1174 - 1237 191 3. Sexual exploitation and sexual abuse ................................ 1238 - 1263 203 4. Other forms of exploitation ............................................... 1264 - 1291 207 5. Sales, trafficking and abduction ........................................ 1292 - 1357 210 D. Children belonging to a minority or an indigenous group ......... 1358 - 1371 220 E. Children living or working on the street .................................... 1372 - 1400 222 IX. OPTIONAL PROTOCOLS TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ........................................................ 1401 - 1512 226 A. Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography ............................................................................... 1401 - 1507 226 B. The Optional Protocol on the Convention regarding the rights of the children involved in armed conflict ....................... 1508 - 1512 240 CRC/C/ROM/4 page 5 CONTENTS (continued) Annexes I. Children’s report on the observance of children’s rights in Romania II. Legislation III. Statistical data IV. The measures adopted by Romania to the recommendation made by the Committee on the previous country report V. List of the institutions that have contributed to the elaboration of the report CRC/C/ROM/4 page 6 Introduction 1. Child protection has been a priority for all of Romania’s governments from 1990 to the present day. Before this period many children were kept in institutions in inhuman and harsh conditions. Romania launched child protection reforms in the early 1990s after having been frequently accused of not being able to care of its children. 2. The first laws adopted accorded considerable importance to placing children in institutions. This was a continuation of the approach taken by the old regime, which saw adoption as an affordable solution for families that could not take proper care of their children. 3. It subsequently became clear that the role played by institutions and the State in child protection should be decreased as it had become obvious that the education and developmental needs of huge numbers of children were not well served by this institutional framework. A decision was therefore taken to close down these institutions and replace them with family type homes offering protection to a smaller number of children. This arrangement offered these children similar conditions to those they would find in a normal family, as well as better educational conditions. 4. Such measures needed of course a new legislative framework that should adapt itself to the new objective necessities of the system but also to the new demands imposed on Romania during the European Union accession process, which had become a national objective. In 2005 a new legislative package was introduced and brought a number of fundamental changes in Romania’s child protection system. The new legislation is based on the principles contained in the European Convention on Human Rights and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The new laws contained principles which recognized the primary role of the family in raising and caring for children. Institutions took on a less important role and were only considered after all other family type protection measures had been considered. 5. Thus, the role of State institutions was redefined. Their role was to
Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 30 November 1999
    United Nations A/AC.254/22 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 November 1999 Original: English Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime Sixth session Vienna, 6-17 December 1999 Analytical study on serious crime Report by the Secretariat I. Introduction 1. At its second session, held in Vienna from 8 to 12 March 1999, the Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime requested the Secretariat to carry out an analytical study on provisions of national laws V.99-90212 (E) A/AC.254/22 concerning serious offences punishable by deprivation of liberty, in relation to article 2 bis (b) of the draft Convention (see A/AC.254/11, para. 18). Pursuant to that request, the Secretariat asked States to provide information on the following: (a) What provisions were contained in their national laws relevant to the draft Convention concerning offences punishable by deprivation of liberty, with an indication of the number of years of imprisonment; (b) Whether their legislation qualified offences as serious and, if so, what criteria were used for such qualification and which crimes fell into that category. 2. As at 15 October 1999, the Secretariat had received responses from 45 States. The present analytical study is based on the information provided by those States. II. Analysis A. National laws concerning offences punishable by deprivation of liberty 3. In response to the first question, many States listed examples of offences punishable by deprivation of liberty and provided information on the number of years of imprisonment imposed for such offences.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2013 - Romania
    ANNUAL REPORT 2013 - Romania Authors: Silvia-Antoaneta Berbec (Ch. 1, 2, 9.3 and 9.5) Ágnes Csonta (Ch. 3) Mihaela Manole (Ch. 4) Iustina Ionescu (Ch. 5, 6 and 9.4) Delia Niţă (Ch. 7 and 10) Adela Dumbrăvan (Ch. 8, 9.1 and 9.2) Georgiana Fusu Plăiaşu (Ch. 11) Senior Expert: Lucian Bojin National Focal Point: Centre for Legal Resources The collection of data and information contained in this report were commissioned in 2013 by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights as background material for the Agency’s comparative analysis that feeds into its annual report. All opinions and views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not represent in any way the official position of the FRA. The FRA Annual report: Fundamental rights: challenges and achievements in 2013 is available online at: www.fra.europa.eu 1 1 ASYLUM, IMMIGRATION AND INTEGRATION 1.1 Monitoring of forced returns The 2011 amendments1 to the Aliens Act2 provided that national and international organizations and entities in the field of migration will have the possibility of monitoring the removal of aliens from the national territory.3 The general legal provisions in the field specify the categories of aliens who can be placed in public custody (administrative detention) until their removal from the territory4, what is the maximum period of public custody as well as the conditions for judicial control of the public custody measure,5 the requirements for granting a temporary permission to remain in Romania (known as toleration),6 and the rights of aliens in public custody.7 The monitoring system of forced returns established in 2011 by the NGO Romanian National Council for Refugees (NRCR) (Consiliul Naţional Român pentru Refugiaţi, CNRR) continued under the project “Improving the implementation and monitoring of forced returns“ until June 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Ii - 2018
    Persons under the supervision of Probation Agencies SPACE II - 2018 Marcelo F. Aebi Yuji Z. Hashimoto Strasbourg, 20 December 2018 pc-cp\space\documents\pc-cp (2018)13 PC-CP (2018) 13 Updated on 21 May 2019 This report has been written by Marcelo F. Aebi and Yuji Z. Hashimoto on behalf of the Council for Penological Cooperation (PC-CP) of the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France. The report has been prepared under a contract with the Action against Crime Department, Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate, DGI - Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law of the Council of Europe. It has also received support from the University of Lausanne, Switzerland. Country based information on persons under the supervision of Probation Agencies was collected through the SPACE II 2018 questionnaire (Ref: PC-CP (2018) 13) and analysed by the authors of this report. The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. Cover picture: Migrant European Robin (Erithacus rubecula), by Lucas Nicolás Muñoz. ©Lucas Nicolás Muñoz. Reproduction authorized for this publication by the author. Suggested citation [APA norms]: Aebi, M. F., & Hashimoto, Y. Z. (2018). SPACE II – 2018 – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Persons under the supervision of Probation Agencies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe © Council of Europe & University of Lausanne, 2018 Reproduction is authorised, except for commercial purposes, provided that the source is acknowledged. Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics – SPACE II – 2018 1 FINAL DRAFT REPORT: NOT FOR CIRCULATION – UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 21 MAY 2019 Key points of SPACE II 2018 The participation rate in the 2018 SPACE II Survey was satisfactory: 44 out of the 52 Probation Agencies (or equivalent institutions) of the 47 Council of Europe Member States answered the questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • An Approach to the Crime of Theft and Its Connection with the Civil Theory of Possession
    Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 1, No. 4, 2015, pp. 361-367 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/jssh An Approach to the Crime of Theft and Its Connection with the Civil Theory of Possession Doinel Dinuică 1, Mioara-Ketty Guiu 2, * 1Faculty of Law and Public Administration, “Spiru Haret” University, Bucharest, Romania 2Faculty of Law and Public Administration, Spiru Haret University, Research Associate of “Acad, Andrei Rădulescu” Legal Research Institute of Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania Abstract Contrary to appearances, the crime of theft raises many complex and difficult issues, most of which have not yet been settled. Almost all essential aspects related to this crime are controversial: its definition, legal object or protection purpose, the limitation period, its delimitation from other similar crimes (such as the crime of breach of trust) etc. One of the reasons of this failure is the so-called “subjective theory of possession” which continues to dominate the civil doctrine and to have a negative influence on the analysis of the crimes against patrimony, in general, and the crime of theft, in special. It is for this reason that the authors of the present paper have endeavoured, firstly, to develop a different theory of possession, an objective one, according to which possession and detention are not “facts as such” but specific prerogatives of the patrimonial rights which differ between themselves by content (possession implies detention, but its content is much broader). Then, starting from this point, the authors have set as their purpose to offer new answers regarding the controversial issues related to the crime of theft (for example, they consider that the theft ensures protection only to legal detention thus, there is no crime of theft if the good is taken from a thief).
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Edition of International Conference
    DANUBIUS UNIVERSITY OF GALATI, ROMANIA UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO, ITALY 8th Edition of International Conference The European Integration – Realities and Perspectives PROCEEDINGS 2 0 1 3 Danubius University Press Galati ISSN 2067-9211 8th Edition of International Conference The European Integration – Realities and Perspectives. Proceedings 2013 © All rights reserved by the authors The selected articles cannot be given for publication to other journals. The quality of the articles is ensured by a blind review process with minimum four (4) national and international reviewers. Publication frequency: 1 issue per year Contact data Address: 3 Galati Boulevard, 800654 Galati, Romania E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro Telephone: +4 0372 361 140 Information about the Publishing House Danubius University Press 3 Galati Boulevard, 800654 Galati, Romania Telephone: + 4 0372 361 140 Fax: + 4 0372 361 294 Website: www.editura.univ-danubius.ro Email: [email protected] [email protected] The journal is financed by Danubius University of Galati, Romania Website: www.univ-danubius.ro Cover: Doru Trandafir Printed at Zigotto Printing House, Galati, Romania Gestrom, Galati, Romania Price per volume: 60 Euro 2 ORGANIZING COMMITTEES General Co-Chairs Andy Pusca, Danubius University, Romania Flavio Corradini, University of Camerino, Italy International Program Committee Benone Pusca, Danubius University, Romania Yvon Pesqueux, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, France Emanuele Felice, University
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child
    UNITED NATIONS CRC Convention on the Distr. GENERAL Rights of the Child CRC/C/65/Add.19 5 July 2002 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Periodic reports of States parties due in 1997 ROMANIA* [18 January 2000] * For the initial report submitted by the Government of Romania, see document CRC/C/3/Add.16, for its consideration by the Committee see documents CRC/C/SR.120-122 and for the concluding observations, see document CRC/C/15/Add.16 GE.02-43077 (E) 080802 CRC/C/65/Add.19 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES ........................ 1 - 51 5 II. THE DEFINITION OF A CHILD (art. 1)..................................... 52 - 53 13 III. GENERAL PRINCIPLES ............................................................ 54 - 120 18 A. Non-discrimination (art. 2) ............................................... 54 - 77 18 B. Best interests of the child (art. 3) ...................................... 78 - 97 22 C. Right to life, survival and development (art. 6) ................ 98 - 107 30 D. Respect for the views of the child (art. 12) ....................... 108 - 120 32 IV. CIVIL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ............................................ 121 - 182 34 A. Name and nationality (art. 7) ............................................ 121 - 129 34 B. Preservation of personal identity (art. 8) .......................... 130 - 136 36 C. Freedom of expression (art. 13) ........................................ 137 - 139 37 D. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (art. 14) ..... 140 - 144 38 E. Freedom of association and peaceful assembly (art. 15) ............................................................................. 145 - 152 39 F. Protection of privacy (art. 16) ........................................... 153 - 160 41 G. Access to appropriate information (art. 17 ) ..................... 161 - 167 42 H. The right not to be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment (art.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Eastern-European Criminal
    JOURNAL OF EASTERN‐EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW NO. 1/2014 1 JOURNAL OF EASTERN­EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW No. 1/2014 Evolution of the Penal Legislation in Romania and Hungary, in the Post­Communist Era 2014 2 AUTOR JOURNAL OF EASTERN‐EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW NO. 1/2014 3 UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS FACULTY OF LAW FACULTY OF LAW JOURNAL OF EASTERN­EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW P BOARD OF EDITORS P Editors­in­Chief Prof. dr. VIOREL PASCA Prof. dr. ISTVÁN GÁL West University of Timisoara University of Pécs Faculty of Law Faculty of Law Editors DR. ADRIAN FANU­MOCA Dr. LAURA MARIA STĂNILĂ Dr. ANDREEA VERTES­OLTEANU Dr. LIVIA SUMANARU Dr. CSABA FENYVESI DR. MIHÁLY TÓTH Dr. DOREL JULEAN Dr. MAGDALENA ROIBU DR. FLORENTINA MUŢIU Dr. PETRE DUNGAN Dr. FLAVIU CIOPEC Dr. TIBERIU MEDEANU Dr. IOANA­CELINA PAȘCA Dr. VOICU PUȘCAȘU ZOLTÁN ANDRÁS NAGY The board of editors shall not take responsibility for the authors' opinions therefore the authors are exclusively responsible for the former. Edited biannually by courtesy of the Criminal Law Departments within the Law Faculties of the West University of Timisoara and the University of Pécs 4 AUTOR Universul Juridic Publishing House Edited by Universul Juridic Publishing House Copyright © 2014, S.C. UNIVERSUL JURIDIC S.R.L. All rights on this edition are reserved to Universul Juridic Publishing House No part of this volume can’t be copied without the subscription of Universul Juridic Publishing House Editorial office: Phone/fax: 021.314.93.13 Phone: 0734.303.101 E­mail: [email protected] Distribution: Phone: 021.314.93.15 Phone/fax: 021.314.93.16 E­mail: [email protected] www.universuljuridic.ro ISSN 2360–4964 JOURNAL OF EASTERN‐EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW NO.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Was Originally Published in Issue 4.3 Of
    Year 4, Issue 3 CEE March 2017 Legal Matters In-Depth Analysis of the News and Newsmakers That Shape Europe’s Emerging Legal Markets Special Editorial: Calling the Better Angels Across the Wire: Deals and Cases in CEE On the Move: New Firms and Practices The Buzz in CEE Experts Review: Compliance A Closer Look: Reported CEE Deals in 2016 Market Spotlight: Serbia The Corner Office: Change of Practice The Belgrade Bar: Discord and Dissent The Fashion of the Day: Law Firm Networks and Alliances in the Former Yugoslavia Inside Out: The EBRD Issues RSD Floating Rate Bonds PRELIMINARY MATTERS MARCH 2017 CEE EDITORIAL: CALLING THE Legal Matters In-Depth Analysis of the News and Newsmakers That Shape Europe's Emerging Legal Markets BETTER ANGELS Special warning: planet. The dangers of this phenomenon are This is a personal real, and go far beyond the mere election of editorial, and not overmatched and unenlightened strongmen. particularly related to That wave could well generate major military lawyering in CEE. I conflict, and soon. Our friends in Ukraine hope our readers will might suggest that time has already come, in indulge this unusual fact, and Mikhail Gorbachev recently lamented exception to our nor- in Time magazine that “it looks as if the entire mal practice. world is preparing for war.” He’s right. As an American This is madness. living in Europe, I’ve received many requests Outrageously, infuriatingly, this retreat from for my thoughts about Donald Trump’s be- democratic principles and from the institutions coming President of the United States. In that have been so instrumental in creating an one sense, my explanation for that bewilder- unprecedented period of peace, progress, and ing achievement is simple: He encouraged and cooperation across the Western world flies di- then exploited fear for his own benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • G2006727.Pdf
    United Nations CAT/C/ROU/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 16 March 2020 and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English English, French and Spanish only or Punishment Committee against Torture Third periodic report submitted by Romania under article 19 of the Convention pursuant to the simplified reporting procedure, due in 2019*, ** [Date received: 30 September 2019] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. ** The annexes to the present report be accessed from the web page of the Committee. GE.20-04020(E) CAT/C/ROU/3 1. The Government of Romania received, through diplomatic channels, a List of questions of the United Nations Committee against Torture (CAT) in connection with the third regular report by Romania (CAT/C/ROU/QPR/3). 2. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) distributed this list of questions to all institutions concerned-the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the National Prison Administration, the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the Directorate for Investigating Organized Crime and Terrorism, the Ombudsman, the Ministry of Labor and Social Justice, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Probation Directorate – including to its own structures, for the purpose of replying and submitting remarks in connection with the comments and inquiries of information delivered by CAT. 3. The reply comprises a point-by-point detailing of the replies provided by Romanian authorities to the questions and inquiries of information delivered by CAT in its report and observes the order of the concerns addressed. At the same time, the responses provided in the present reply were intended to cover any relevant legislative, administrative or judicial measures taken in order to implement the provisions of the Convention, not only the Committee’s follow-up questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Elements in the Contemporary Business Law
    Dobrinka Chankova (ed.) Ivan Pankevych (ed.) Dynamic Elements in the Contemporary Business Law Dynamic Elements in the Contemporary Business Law Editors: Dobrinka Chankova Activity Dobrinka Chankova, PhD, is Professor of Criminal Procedure Law at South-West University, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. From 2004 until 2018 she lectured on Mediation in Penal and Civil Matters at New Bulgarian University, Sofia. Guest-professor at many foreign universities. She is the Chair of the Institute of Conflict Resolution in Sofia and has served as an expert of the National Assembly and Ministry of Justice of Bulgaria and of the Council of Europe Committees on Crime Problems and Media- tion in Penal Matters. Mediator, founder and member of the Board of the National Association of Mediators, Bulgaria. Member of the European Forum for Restorative Justice, World Society of Victimology, the Union of the Scientists in Bulgaria and the Union of the Jurists in Bulgaria. Editor-in-chief of Law, Politics, Administration Journal. Member of the Editorial Board of the European Journal of Policing Studies, US-China Law Review and International Journal of Law and Society. Publications Editor of the Manual for the Local Elections Supervisor, Sofia, 2000 and Human Rights and Their Protection (compendium), Sofia, 2001. Co-editor of A Century of the Criminal Code and Current Issues of Criminal Legislation 1896-1996, Sofia, 1996 and Manual for Education of Pedagogical Staff for School Violence Prevention (V. 1, 2 and 3) Social Fund-Pazardjik, 2008. Sole author of 3 books: Investigation of Perjury, Sofia, 1995, Victim-Offender Mediation, Sofia, Feneya, 2002 and Restora- tive Justice. A Comparative Analysis, Avangard Prima Publishing, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovietization of the Romanian Criminal Justice System
    Subordinating Justice in Communist Romania: The Sovietization of the Romanian Criminal Justice System (1945-1953) By Cojocariu Maria Andreea Submitted to the Central European University, Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Constantin Iordachi Second reader: Virgiliu Ţârău CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2011 Statement of copyright Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details must be obtained from the librarian. This page must be a part of copies such made. Further copies made in accordance with the instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection ii ABSTRACT In this thesis I address the judicial and legal systems of Romania from 1945 to 1953 within the context of the communist tack-over of Sovietization of Romania. More precisely, I discuss the arrangement of the judiciary and several amendments brought to criminal legislation (Penal Code). I argue that during the period under my focus Soviet- type judicial institutions, legal concepts, and practices were transplanted to Romania at different stages. I also argue that beginning in 1948, when a Soviet-type constitution and a new penal code came into effect, the communist government of Romania gave political repression, to a certain extent a legal dimension. Accordingly, my aim is to demonstrate that the repressive nature of the regime was upheld by the ideological interpretation of criminal law.
    [Show full text]
  • AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences
    AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences www.juridicaljournal.univagora.ro Year 2014 No. 4 Publisher: Agora University Press This journal is indexed in: International Database International Catalog EDITORIAL BOARD Editor in chief: PhD. Professor Elena-Ana IANCU, Agora University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania – member in the Executive Editorial Board. Associate Editor in chief: PhD. Professor Adriana MANOLESCU, Agora University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania – member in Executive Editorial Board; PhD. Professor Cornelia LEFTER, The Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania. Scientific Editor: PhD. Professor Ovidiu ŢINCA, Agora University of Oradea, Romania – member in the Executive Editorial Board. Executive editor: PhD. Professor Salvo ANDO, “Kore” University, Enna, Italy; PhD. Associate Professor Alina-Angela MANOLESCU, Agora University of Oradea, Romania Associate executive editors: 1. PhD. Professor Ion DOGARU, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania; 2. PhD. Professor Emilian STANCU, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania. Associate editors: 1. PhD. Professor Alfio D'URSO, “Magna Grecia” University, Catanzaro, Italy; 2. PhD. Professor Alexandru BOROI, “Danubius” University from Galați, Galaţi, Romania; 3. PhD. Professor Ioan-Nuţu MIRCEA, associated professor “Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; 4. PhD. Professor Ovidiu PREDESCU, “Law Journal” (executive editor), “Criminal Law Journal” (editor in chief), Bucharest, Romania; 5. PhD. Professor Brânduşa ŞTEFĂNESCU, The Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania; 6. PhD. Alexandru CORDOŞ, Christian University „Dimitrie Cantemir”, Romania 7. PhD. Szabó BÉLA, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 8. PhD. Professor Farkas AKOS - University of Miskolc, State and Juridical Sciences Chair - The Institute of Criminal law sciences, Miskolc, Hungary; 9. PhD. Professor Jozsef SZABADFALVI, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 10. PhD. Professor Luigi MELICA, University of Lecce, Lecce, Italy; 11.
    [Show full text]