Syria Peace Talks in Geneva: a Road to Nowhere

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Syria Peace Talks in Geneva: a Road to Nowhere Syria Peace Talks in Geneva: A Road to Nowhere Radwan Ziadeh March 27, 2017 Syria Peace Talks in Geneva: A Road to Nowhere Radwan Ziadeh On March 3, 2017, the United Nations’ Special Istanbul. The anti-government protests Envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, concluded intensified but were not under the opposition’s the last round of Syria peace negotiations in control. At the same time, the international Geneva by saying that it was a step forward community was focused elsewhere—on the fall because it succeeded in securing a final agenda of the Qadhafi regime and its aftermath. for another round of talks. The UN Security Council was united enough to It is interesting to note that the new measure of pass Resolution 1973 to “protect the civilians” of progress in peace talks, according to the United Libya by all necessary means. However, the Nations, is to create an agenda for the next council later became divided and polarized on round of talks! This reflects exactly how the Syria when Russia and China began to veto negotiations in Geneva have become: a goal statements critical of the Syrian regime. In 2011 unto themselves, instead of providing a bridge and 2012, the council could not issue any to end the Syrian crisis, now entering its seventh condemnations of the continued violence by the year. Syrian government against its own people because Russia used its veto twice. Prelude to the Geneva Communiqué of 2012 The Syrian opposition realized the need for After the eruption of the Syrian uprising in building an international coalition outside the 2011, the Syrian opposition faced the mammoth security council which could develop some task of building and structuring itself quickly. options to protect the Syrian people. Thus, a Due to the nature of Syrian authoritarianism, “Friends of the Syrian People” group of nations and the leaderless and ideology-less Syrian was established and it held its first meeting in revolution at the time, the opposition had to be Tunisia in February 2012. Nothing came of that created as a fully representative body in a few meeting, however, and another was arranged to months’ time, which was virtually impossible. be held in Istanbul. At that time, Turkey started talking about the need for safe zones and no-fly The first attempt at organizing the opposition zones as a means to protect the Free Syrian was the September 2011 establishment of the Army and encourage more defections within Syrian National Council (SNC), a loose alliance President Bashar al-Asad's army. that emerged as a political umbrella for different Syrian opposition groups. The SNC Here started the gap between the high used Istanbul as a base for all its activities. expectation of the Syrian opposition and Peaceful protests continued in most of the regional powers like Turkey and Saudi Arabia, Syrian cities without any ability to build a on the one hand, and the international strong connection between the protesters on the community and especially the United States, on ground and the leadership of the SNC in the other. The Obama Administration was not 1 Arab Center Washington DC March 2017 ready to move from political rhetoric to military the statement, requiring full Syrian regime action. The Syrian opposition realized that this cooperation, outlined the "release of makes the idea of “Friends of the Syrian People” arbitrarily detained persons, especially useless, and the newly appointed Joint Special persons involved in peaceful political Envoy of the United Nations and the League of activities” and “respecting freedom of Arab States for Syria, Kofi Annan, discovered association and the right to demonstrate that he had very limited power over the parties peacefully as legally guaranteed.” involved in the conflict. Annan learned that the Security Council would not grant him the As a result, the Syrian government realized support he needed for his mission, so he that the transition would be inevitable if the decided to move in a different direction and the Geneva Communiqué were implemented. Geneva process started. Instead, the government decided to execute a large-scale detention campaign against the The Geneva Process peaceful protesters while, at the same time, trying with all possible means to suppress the The Geneva Communiqué was announced by protests. They became larger in size, especially Kofi Annan on June 30, 2012 in Geneva, under in Hama and Homs, and took place in more the umbrella of the “Action Group for Syria.” targeted locations in the heart of the big cities However, neither the Syrian regime nor the like Hama and Aleppo. opposition attended the meeting that formulated the plan. Embedded in the The Joint Special Envoy, Kofi Annan, decided communiqué was the idea of “power sharing,” to resign in August 2012. He stated later in an which had worked very well in Kenya interview that the Security Council had not according to Annan, who was the UN secretary backed his efforts. Annan was criticized from general at that time. The Geneva almost everyone in the Syrian government Communiqué states that any political solution and the opposition, both of whom were must be accepted by both parties, who have displeased because the former did not want “mutual vetoes,” referring here to the Syrian any implementation of the plan, and the latter government and the opposition. At the same because he was not doing enough to time, it mentioned that the transfer of power implement it. should be done through what is called a “transitional governing body with full Annan’s replacement was the Algerian authorities.” veteran diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi, who stated he would continue to work on carrying The Syrian government rejected the Geneva out the principles of the Geneva Communiqué Communiqué and never said it would by convening a new meeting in Geneva of the implement it. The six-point plan mentioned in two parties—the Syrian government and 2 Syria Peace Talks in Geneva: A Road to Nowhere Radwan Ziadeh opposition— to start direct negotiations to negotiate as well as to enforce any deal on the agree on the six-point plan. domestic players. This is why he insisted on including Iran, despite the Islamic Republic’s The Syrian opposition formed a new body rejection of the Geneva Communiqué. called the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces in After the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Doha, after criticism that the Syrian National Levant (ISIL) in Syria, the Obama Council was not representative of the Syrian Administration decided to conduct strikes opposition. It agreed to attend the first direct against it in Raqqa without conferring with the talks with representatives from the Asad Syrian government. Obama stated that to be government in January 2014. Brahimi able to eliminate ISIL from Syria, there needed discovered that the gap between the two to be a political transition that enabled the groups was huge. In addition, Russia did little Syrian people to form a legitimate government to persuade the Syrian government to accept that can unify them against terrorism. He the Geneva Communiqué, which became part instructed Secretary of State John Kerry to of the two Security Council resolutions 2042 convince Russia to support his new approach and 2043. Brahimi, however, felt powerless toward Syria—fighting ISIL as a priority but, at and resigned in May 2014. the same time, supporting negotiations to forge a political settlement in the country. The war in Syria entered a new stage after the Ghouta chemical attack in August 2013, which Kerry and Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs killed at least 1,400 civilians on the outskirts of Sergei Lavrov agreed to form two international Damascus, among them 400 children. The tracks to deal with the Syria crisis, one to ensuing deal between the United States and respond to the humanitarian crisis and Russia asserted that the Syrian government implement Security Council resolution 2268, give up its chemical weapons in order to avoid and another to convene a meeting in Vienna any military strikes by the Obama called the International Syria Support Group Administration. (ISSG), which was held on November 14, 2015. Again, representatives of neither the Syrian The Vienna and Astana Tracks government nor the opposition attended the meeting. The new group issued a statement Two months after the resignation of Joint acknowledging “the close linkage between a Special Envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, UN Secretary- ceasefire and a parallel political process under General Ban Ki-moon appointed the Italian the 2012 Geneva Communiqué, and that both diplomat Staffan de Mistura to take his place. initiatives should move ahead expeditiously.” De Mistura had a new approach, one that This agreement generated Security Council brought all regional actors to the table to resolution 2254 in December 2015, which was 3 Arab Center Washington DC March 2017 adopted unanimously and laid the foundation had become more frustrated by the United for the current Syrian negotiations in Geneva to States because of its continued support of the end the conflict. Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD, or the Syrian version of the PKK), sponsored the Since his appointment in January 2016, Joint “Astana track” with participation of the Syrian Special Envoy de Mistura convened two rounds armed opposition for the first time. The focus of talks in Geneva between the newly was exclusively on the implementation of the constituted opposition group, called the High ceasefire agreed to after the battles in Aleppo, Negotiation Committee (HNC), and the Syrian but neither the Syrian government nor Russia government. Like previous talks, there were no had respected the ceasefire. The opposition immediate results. The battle on the ground had discovered that the “Astana track” was a cover started to shift in favor of the Syrian for the government to control more areas like government after the Russian military the rebel-held al-Waer neighborhood in Homs.
Recommended publications
  • American University of Beirut Detection of Fake News in the Syrian
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT DETECTION OF FAKE NEWS IN THE SYRIAN WAR by ROAA AL FEEL A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science to the Department of Computer Science of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at the American University of Beirut Beirut, Lebanon January 2019 Acknowledgements I would like to use this opportunity to express my gratitude to everyone who supported me throughout my masters study and through the process of research- ing and writing this thesis. I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr. Fa- tima Abu Salem for giving me the opportunity to be involved in this research project and her invaluable guidance, patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and im- mense knowledge throughout this research. I am also grateful to the members of my thesis committee for all of their guidance throughout this process; your discussion, ideas, and feedback have been absolutely invaluable. I would also like to thank my friends at AUB who have shared this experience with me for all the fun we have had in this journey. And last but by no means least, I am extremely grateful to my parents and brother for all the love, support, and constant encouragement they have provided me with throughout my years of study. This accomplishment would not have been possible without you all. Thank you. v An Abstract of the Thesis of Roaa Al Feel for Master of Science Major: Computer Science Title: Detection of Fake News in the Syrian War After almost eight years of conflict, the humanitarian situation in Syria con- tinues to deteriorate year after year.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 140/ 30 March 2016
    Syrian Crisis United Nations Response A Weekly Update from the UN Department of Public Information No. 140/ 30 March 2016 Secretary-General appeals for greater global solidarity with Syrian refugees Speaking at a UNHCR conference on Syrian refugees on 30 March in Geneva, the Secretary-General called for an “exponential increase in global solidarity”. “Today, I ask that countries act with solidarity, in the name of our shared humanity, by pledging new and additional pathways for the admission of Syrian refugees. These pathways can include resettlement or humanitarian admission, family reunions, as well as labour or study opportunities”, Mr. Ban said. UNHCR is trying to get at least 480,000 Syrian refugees to resettle or find another form of admission in a third country. “The world must step up, with concrete actions and pledges. All countries can do more,” the Secretary-General stressed. http://www.un.org/sg/statements/index.asp?nid=9572 Humanitarian situation remains dire in many besieged areas, warns UN Emergency Relief Coordinator UN humanitarian chief Stephen O’Brien told the Security Council on 30 March that while there has been recent progress on humanitarian access, the UN continues to face daily obstacles to reach those in need across Syria. ”Many of the 4.6 million people in need in besieged and hard-to-reach areas still remain outside our reach due to insecurity and obstructions by the parties. Even where we receive responses, these are often not approved”, Mr. O’Brien said. “In 2016 so far, we have only reached some 30 per cent of people in besieged areas and less than 10 per cent of people in hard-to-reach areas”, he added, stressing that the humanitarian situation in many of those areas remains critical.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Civil Society During the Peace Talks in Geneva: Role and Challenges Zedoun Alzoubi Union of Medical Care and Relief Organizations, Syria
    New England Journal of Public Policy Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 11 3-20-2017 Syrian Civil Society during the Peace Talks in Geneva: Role and Challenges Zedoun Alzoubi Union of Medical Care and Relief Organizations, Syria Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp Part of the International Relations Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Recommended Citation Alzoubi, Zedoun (2017) "Syrian Civil Society during the Peace Talks in Geneva: Role and Challenges," New England Journal of Public Policy: Vol. 29 : Iss. 1 , Article 11. Available at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol29/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Journal of Public Policy by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. New England Journal of Public Policy Syrian Civil Society during the Peace Talks in Geneva: Role and Challenges Zedoun Alzoubi Union of Medical Care and Relief Organizations, Syria Syrian civil society witnessed a new birth in 2011 following decades of hibernation due to oppression. The fast growth and maturity of civil society organizations gave them the opportunity to occupy a formal space in the ongoing peace talks in Geneva. The presence of the Women’s Advisory Board, the Civil Society Support Room, and the recently established Experts Room during the peace talks in the Palais de Nations allows them to influence the negotiation process. This article is the first published documentation of the role of civil society in the peace process and the challenges that face these talks.
    [Show full text]
  • The 12Th Annual Report on Human Rights in Syria 2013 (January 2013 – December 2013)
    The 12th annual report On human rights in Syria 2013 (January 2013 – December 2013) January 2014 January 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Genocide: daily massacres amidst international silence 8 Arbitrary detention and Enforced Disappearances 11 Besiegement: slow-motion genocide 14 Violations committed against health and the health sector 17 The conditions of Syrian refugees 23 The use of internationally prohibited weapons 27 Violations committed against freedom of the press 31 Violations committed against houses of worship 39 The targeting of historical and archaeological sites 44 Legal and legislative amendments 46 References 47 About SHRC 48 The 12th annual report on human rights in Syria (January 2013 – December 2013) Introduction The year 2013 witnessed a continuation of grave and unprecedented violations committed against the Syrian people amidst a similarly shocking and unprecedented silence in the international community since the beginning of the revolution in March 2011. Throughout the year, massacres were committed on almost a daily basis killing more than 40.000 people and injuring 100.000 others at least. In its attacks, the regime used heavy weapons, small arms, cold weapons and even internationally prohibited weapons. The chemical attack on eastern Ghouta is considered a landmark in the violations committed by the regime against civilians; it is also considered a milestone in the international community’s response to human rights violations Throughout the year, massacres in Syria, despite it not being the first attack in which were committed on almost a daily internationally prohibited weapons have been used by the basis killing more than 40.000 regime. The international community’s response to the crime people and injuring 100.000 drew the international public’s attention to the atrocities others at least.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of International Response to the Situation in Syria
    Timeline of International Response to the Situation in Syria Beginning with dates of a few key events that initiated the unrest in March 2011, this timeline provides a chronological list of important news and actions from local, national, and international actors in response to the situation in Syria. Skip to: [2012] [2013] [2014] [2015] [2016] [Most Recent] Acronyms: EU – European Union PACE – Parliamentary Assembly of the Council CoI – UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria of Europe FSA – Free Syrian Army SARC – Syrian Arab Red Crescent GCC – Gulf Cooperation Council SASG – Special Adviser to the Secretary- HRC – UN Human Rights Council General HRW – Human Rights Watch SES – UN Special Envoy for Syria ICC – International Criminal Court SOC – National Coalition of Syrian Revolution ICRC – International Committee of the Red and Opposition Forces Cross SOHR – Syrian Observatory for Human Rights IDPs – Internally Displaced People SNC – Syrian National Council IHL – International Humanitarian Law UN – United Nations ISIL – Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant UNESCO – UN Educational, Scientific and ISSG – International Syria Support Group Cultural Organization JSE – UN-Arab League Joint Special Envoy to UNGA – UN General Assembly Syria UNHCR – UN High Commissioner for LAS – League of Arab States Refugees NATO – North Atlantic Treaty Organization UNICEF – UN Children’s Fund OCHA – UN Office for the Coordination of UNRWA – UN Relief Works Agency for Humanitarian Affairs Palestinian Refugees OIC – Organization of Islamic Cooperation UNSC – UN Security Council OHCHR – UN Office of the High UNSG – UN Secretary-General Commissioner for Human Rights UNSMIS – UN Supervision Mission in Syria OPCW – Organization for the Prohibition of US – United States Chemical Weapons 2011 2011: Mar 16 – Syrian security forces arrest roughly 30 of 150 people gathered in Damascus’ Marjeh Square for the “Day of Dignity” protest, demanding the release of imprisoned relatives held as political prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Brotherhood Discourses on Daaʿsh
    TRADITIONAL ISLAMISM CONFRONTS A NEW ACTOR: SYRIAN BROTHERHOOD DISCOURSES ON DAAʿSH by ALYSSA GOESSLER A THESIS Presented to the Department of Social Sciences and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts June 2016 An Abstract of the Thesis of Alyssa Goessler for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of Social Sciences to be taken June 2016 Title: Traditional Islamism Confronts a New Actor: Syrian Brotherhood Discourses on Daa' sh David Hollenber Exiled from the Syrian political scene for thirty years, the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood seized upon the chaos of the 2011 uprising as an opportunity to revive their dwindling political status in the country. While they have made impressive strides towards this goal, they were certainly not the only organization to utilize the conflict for political ends. Daa' sh-the infamously barbaric Jihadi-Salafi institution-began expanding its operations into Syria as early as 2012. Daa'sh utilizes highly publicized brutality, which continues to revitalize a public dialogue on Islamism, forcing organizations like the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood to grapple with a rapidly evolving political and religious landscape. This Islamist challenge combined with the Ikhwan's struggle to unite various opposition forces has muddled the rhetorical scheme of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. Add to these challenges some burgeoning internal divisions, and the result is a rhetorical blunder. In this thesis, I analyze Syrian MB public statements on Daa'sh, focusing on the rhetorical tools they rely on to respond to the political Daa'sh poses to the MB's legitimacy.
    [Show full text]
  • S/PV.8434 the Situation in the Middle East 20/12/2018
    United Nations S/ PV.8434 Security Council Provisional Seventy-third year 8434th meeting Thursday, 20 December 2018, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Adom ..................................... (Côte d’Ivoire) Members: Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ..................... Mr. Zambrana Torrelio China ......................................... Mr. Wu Haitao Equatorial Guinea ............................... Mr. Esono Mbengono Ethiopia ....................................... Mr. Amde France ........................................ Mr. Delattre Kazakhstan .................................... Mr. Umarov Kuwait ........................................ Mr. Alotaibi Netherlands .................................... Mr. Van Oosterom Peru .......................................... Mr. Meza-Cuadra Poland ........................................ Mr. Lewicki Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Nebenzia Sweden ....................................... Mr. Skoog United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Ms. Pierce United States of America .......................... Mr. Hunter Agenda The situation in the Middle East . This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 for Further Information, Contact Integrity UK On: Enquiries
    A B O U T I N T E G R I T Y U K Integrity UK is an organisation committed to preventing extremism through innovative approaches to promoting integration, cohesion and social reconciliation within the MENA region and the UK. S Y R I A I N T E L L I G E N C E R E P O R T 1st March 2018 At an emergency meeting of the Security Council on Wednesday evening, the officials of the United Nations issued severe criticisms of Russia's handling of the truce in East Ghouta and the continued shelling across the besieged suburb. The UN Under-Secretary for Humanitarian Affairs, Mark Lowcock, slammed the humanitarian corridors. He noted that neither the UN nor the International Committee of the Red Cross has managed to deliver aid during the five-hour window where the truce is active, remarking that such an undertaking is logistically impossible. According to Lowcock, over 580 civilians have been killed since the shelling started in earnest last weekend. Echoing Lowcock’s remarks, the United States' Deputy Ambassador to the UN, Kelley Curie, slammed Russia for selectively following the UNSC Resolution in “cynical, callous and in flagrant defiance” of its clauses. The UN's Special Envoy to Syria, Staffan de Mistura, noted that the UN is pushing for access into East Ghouta, warning that the alternative is another Aleppo. However, the general mood was one of pessimism, with Lowcock remarking that aid distribution across Syria has reduced due to refusals by Damascus to issue permissions. However, Syria's Ambassador to the UN, Bashar al-Jaafari, was concerned with a warning of a different nature.
    [Show full text]
  • A Special Report on the Chemical Attack in Khan Sheikhoun - Idlib April 4, 2017
    A Special Report on the Chemical Attack in Khan Sheikhoun - Idlib April 4, 2017 About JFL Justice for Life Observatory in Deir Ezzor in a Syrian independent non-governmental non- profit organization that includes human rights Syrian activists regardless of their affiliations and ideologies. It works on documenting the violations of human rights in order to be used in the phase after war; where the collected and checked proofs will be used in the process of reconciliation and transitional justice. The observatory works constantly on the campaigns of advocacy of human rights in order to reach the desired peace. About STJ “Syrians for Truth and Justice” (STJ) is an independent, non-governmental non-profit Syrian organization. It involves a number of Syrian human rights defenders, both men and women, from different backgrounds and affiliations. The founding team also includes academics from different nationalities. STJ works for Syria where all citizens, males and females, enjoy dignity, justice and equal human rights. 2 A Special Report on the Chemical Attack in Khan Sheikhoun - Idlib April 4, 2017 Table of Contents The Legal Framework for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons in Armed Conflicts . 4 Prohibition of Applying Chemical Weapons and the Syrian Conflict . 5 Methodology . 6 Challenges . .. 7 Preface . .. 7 Section 1: The Locations of the Rockets Loaded with Toxic Substances . 9 Section 2: The Details of the Attack . 21 Section 3: The Symptoms . 22 Section 4: Journalists and Medics Affected by the Gas . 24 Section 5: Displacement in the Wake of Khan Sheikhoun Attack . 26 Section 6: The Victims’ Accounts . .27 Section 7: The Casualties List .
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Nation Skun E S
    A- UNITED NATIONS NATION SKUN E S POSTAL ADDRESS - AORESSE POSTAL!: UNITED NATIONS. N.Y. 10017 CABLE ADMESS • AORESSE TELEGRAPHIQUE: UNATION5 NEWYORK EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL CABINET DU SECRETAIRE GENERAL FACSIMILE DATE: 25 August 1998 TO: FROM: Mr. Staffan de Mistura Edward Mortimer ^/u Director Principal Officer ^J T UNIC Rome New York FAX: 011-39-6-679-3337 FAX: (212) 963-2155 TEL: TEL: (212) 963-9220 E-MAIL: [email protected] SUBJECT: MESSAGE FOR FUNERAL OF LT. COLONEL CALO TOTAL NUMBER OF TRANSMITTED PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 4 Further to your fax of 24 August to Mr. Riza, attached is a message from the Secretary-General to be read at the funeral tomorrow. Best regards. f ft THE SECRETARY-GENERAL MESSAGE TO THE FUNERAL OF LT. COLONEL CARMINE CALO Delivered on his behalf by Mr. Staffan de Mistura, Director, United Nations Information Centre, Rome Ponte Cagnano Military Base. Italy. 26 August 1998 The men and women who go into the field on behalf of the United Nations, whether they wear the blue helmets of UN peacekeepers, work for one of our humanitarian agencies or undertake missions for other UN bodies, are a breed apart. They take to heart the stirring summons to global solidarity enshrined in the UN Charter; they take it upon themselves to leave their homes and their families so as to contribute to our global mission of peace and development; they take their jobs and their missions seriously, working selflessly, often in perilous situations, for the greater, common good. Such a person was Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Process in Its Own Right: the Syrian Civil Society Support Room
    A process in its own right: the Syrian Civil Society Support Room Dr Rim Turkmani and Marika Theros 16 June 2019 2 A process in its own right About the Conflict Research Programme at LSE The Conflict Research Programme aims to understand why contemporary violence is so difficult to end and to analyse the underlying political economy of violence with a view to informing policy. Our research sites are Iraq, Syria, South Sudan, Somalia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Syria Conflict Research Programme focuses on five interrelated research topics. The function and legitimacy of public authority, identity politics, economic drivers of the conflict, civicness and reconstruction. The programme uses a mixed methodology using primary and secondary sources. The programme collaborates with the Middle East based Governance and Development Research Centre. This research was funded by the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID); however the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official positions or policies. Front cover picture: The UN Special Envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura opening the Syria peace talks in Geneva in January 2017. Behind him he chose to have two Syrian women. A member of the Civil Society Support Room and a member of the Women Advisory Board. On his right sat the government delegation and on his left sat the opposition delegation, both not showing in this picture. Photo credit: Sputnik International. 3 A process in its own right Over the years, both in Afghanistan and in Syria, I have seen the substantial impact on peace building by civil society, and in particular women.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting the Risk of Extreme Massacres in Syria Adam Scharpf1, Gerald Schneider2, Anna Nöh3, Aaron Clauset4
    Forecasting the Risk of Extreme Massacres in Syria Adam Scharpf1, Gerald Schneider2, Anna Nöh3, Aaron Clauset4 An abundance of large data sets and improved estimation methods have enabled conflict researchers to estimate the risk of war or terrorist incidents quite precisely. However, as it is the case with the prediction of particularly violent earthquakes, forecasting extremely bloody events in ongoing conflicts has been difficult until now. This article reports how the power laws can be used to predict extreme massacres ex post and ex ante. The power law distribution that we use is based on the observation that the standard probability distributions like the normal distribution typically underestimate the risk of such escalations. Using fatality data until the end of February 2013, we calculate the probability of at least one single event with 250 or more dead civilians at 80% (59% - 94%) and between March and May 2013 of up to 48%. We discuss the ethical and practical implications of these findings and argue that the forecasts could provide a transparent risk assessment tool to decision makers. One-sided violence - civil war - power law distribution - conflict prediction - early warning - Syria 1 Doctoral student Graduate School of Economic & Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, [email protected] 2 Professor of International Politics, Department of Politics and Public Administration and Graduate School of Decision Sciences, University of Konstanz, [email protected] 3 Master student, Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Konstanz, [email protected] 4 Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado; external faculty member Santa Fe Institute, [email protected] 1.
    [Show full text]