DOCSLIB.ORG

War and Occupation in Iraq

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
War and Occupation in Iraq War and Occupation in Iraq Published by: Arab Commission for Human Rights • Center for Constitutional Rights Center for Development of International Law • Code Pink Council on International and Public Affairs • Fellowship of Reconciliation Global Action on Aging • Global Exchange • Global Policy Forum Hague Appeal for Peace • Instituto del Tercer Mundo • Institute for Policy Studies International Center for Law in Development • International Women’s Tribune Center Iraq Analysis Group • Jewish Voice for Peace • Lawyers’ Committee on Nuclear Policy Mennonite Central Committee • Middle East Research & Information Project Nuclear Age Peace Foundation • PLATFORM • Presbyterian United Nations Office Protection of Human Rights Defenders in the Arab World • Social Watch Tavola della Pace • Transnational Institute United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society US Labor Against the War • Weltwirtschaft, Ökologie & Entwicklung (WEED) Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom June 2007 Acknowledgements: Report prepared by Global Policy Forum Principal Authors: James Paul and Céline Nahory Senior Researchers: Rachel Laurence and Mike Lewis Research Associates: Philippa Curran, Anna Dupont, Peter Jenkins, Alice Skipper. Production: Katarina Wahlberg We gratefully acknowledge helpful comments and input from: Tony Alessandrini, Phyllis Bennis, Medea Benjamin, John Burroughs, Rob Callard, Pratap Chatterjee, Steve Crawshaw, Peter Davies, Clarence Dias, Rachel DuBois Montgomery, Sean Garcia, Irene Gendzier, AK Gupta, Jessica Huber, Janis Karpinski, Joel Krieger, Jens Martens, Greg Muttit, Sayre Nyce, Chris Toensing, Cedric Turlan, Hans von Sponeck, Jeff Spurr, Elizabeth Stone, Peter Weiss, Kristele Younes. Thanks to Akiko Harayama for creating the special map. We thank Gordon Gray, Jr. for his very generous lead support of this project. We also thank the Arab Commission for Human Rights, Code Pink, the General Board of Church and Society - United Methodist Church, the General Board of Global Ministries - United Methodist Church, Global Exchange, the Samuel Rubin Foundation, the World Council of Churches United Nations Liaison Office, as well as other partners and many generous individual donors, for their partnership and financial assistance. Cover photo credit: Spec. Charles Gill, US Department of Defense War and Occupation in Iraq Published by: Arab Commission for Human Rights • Center for Constitutional Rights Center for Development of International Law • Code Pink Council on International and Public Affairs • Fellowship of Reconciliation Global Action on Aging • Global Exchange • Global Policy Forum Hague Appeal for Peace • Instituto del Tercer Mundo • Institute for Policy Studies International Center for Law in Development International Women’s Tribune Center • Iraq Analysis Group Jewish Voice for Peace • Lawyers’ Committee on Nuclear Policy Mennonite Central Committee • Middle East Research & Information Project Nuclear Age Peace Foundation • PLATFORM Presbyterian United Nations Office Protection of Human Rights Defenders in the Arab World • Social Watch Tavola della Pace • Transnational Institute United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society US Labor Against the War • Weltwirtschaft, Ökologie & Entwicklung (WEED) Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom June 2007 Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................... i Map of Major Coalition Attacks, Bases and Prisons Political Map of Iraq 1. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 2. Destruction of Cultural Heritage ............................................................. 13 3. Indiscriminate and Especially Injurious Weapons .................................. 23 4. Unlawful Detention.................................................................................. 31 5. Abuse and Torture of Prisoners ............................................................... 43 6. Attacks on Cities...................................................................................... 55 7. Killing Civilians, Murder and Atrocities................................................. 65 8. Displacement and Mortality .................................................................... 76 9. Corruption, Fraud and Gross Malfeasance .............................................. 86 10. Long-Term Bases and the New Embassy Compound.......................... 101 11. Other Issues........................................................................................... 111 • Iraqi Public Opinion and the Occupation .............................................. 111 • Cost of the War and Occupation............................................................ 112 12. Conclusion & Recommendations ........................................................ 116 i War and Occupation in Iraq Executive Summary 1 – Introduction groups and whose policies have failed to protect the Iraqi people or to bring On March 20, 2003, the United States, peace, prosperity and democracy, as ear- the United Kingdom and a Coalition of lier claimed. allies invaded Iraq and overthrew the government of Saddam Hussein. They From our perspective, the responsibility claimed to bring peace, prosperity and of the US Coalition is especially grave because the UN Security Council gave it democracy. But ever since, violence, a mandate. As such, it should comply civil strife and economic hardship have with the highest standards of interna- wracked the land. Though US President tional legality. Though the Council had George W. Bush delivered his “mission refused to authorize the war, just a few accomplished” speech on May 2, 2003, months later it mandated the Coalition as the conflict has continued for more than a “multinational force” (MNF). Council four years. Thousands of innocent peo- members at the time hoped that the UN ple are now dead and wounded, millions would assume a “vital role” in Iraq, lead- are displaced, several of Iraq’s cities lie ing the way back to peace and interna- in ruins, and enormous resources have tional legality. But this did not happen. been squandered. The United States allowed the UN only marginal involvement, both on the This report considers many aspects of ground and in New York. On August 19, the conflict, with special emphasis on 2003, a truck bomb destroyed UN head- the US Coalition’s responsibilities under quarters in Baghdad and the organization international law. It also considers po- drastically reduced its presence in the country. Since then, the UN has had al- litical and economic issues in Iraq and most no oversight role and the Security argues for urgent change, including a Council has rarely had a substantive dis- speedy withdrawal of Coalition forces. cussion about the matter. The report does not examine in detail the Each week, there are further disturbing insurgency, or the criminal gangs and reports from Iraq and further evidence of militias which are so often in the news. international law violations and massive These forces, which have diverse moti- human suffering. Iraqi public opinion vations, often engage in violent tactics overwhelmingly favors a near-term and some are responsible for large num- withdrawal and the public in the United bers of deaths and injuries among inno- States has signaled its disapproval of the cent Iraqi civilians. The increasing occupation in the Congressional mid- bloodshed and sectarian division among term elections. Public officials and mili- Iraqis is abhorrent. But whatever respon- tary commanders in Washington and sibility Iraqis themselves bear for the London increasingly express misgivings, present impasse within the country, the too. But understanding of the conflict primary responsibility lies with the remains incomplete and clouded by offi- United States and its Coalition, whose cial dogma and multiple misconceptions. military occupation gave rise to these ii This report hopes to bring new informa- from arbitrary arrest and the number of tion and analysis to the public debate, to prisoners has risen greatly since 2003. help bring an end to the suffering and More than thirty thousand detainees lack violence. fundamental rights and they are kept in deplorable physical conditions, many for 2 – Destruction of Cultural Heritage long periods. US commanders have turned over thousands of detainees to The United States and its allies ignored Iraqi authorities whose prisons seriously the warnings of organizations and schol- violate human rights standards. ars concerning the protection of Iraq’s cultural heritage, including museums, 5 – Prisoner Abuse and Torture libraries, archaeological sites and other precious repositories. Arsonists badly United States forces have criminally burned the National Library and looters abused and tortured large numbers of pillaged the National Museum. Looters Iraqi prisoners. Hundreds of Iraqis have also damaged or destroyed many historic suffered from this inhuman treatment buildings and artifacts. The US con- and some have died as a direct result. structed a military base on the site of an- Torture has taken place in many sites cient Babylon. Coalition forces de- across Iraq, including central prisons like stroyed or badly damaged many historic Abu Ghraib, secret interrogation centers urban areas and buildings, while thieves and dozens of local facilities. Torture have ruined thousands of incomparable, increasingly takes place in Iraqi prisons, unprotected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals
    UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before TOZZI, COOK, and MAGGS1 Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Private First Class LYNNDIE R. ENGLAND United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20051170 Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood James Pohl, Military Judge Colonel Clyde J. Tate, II, Staff Judge Advocate (pretrial) Colonel Mark Cremin, Staff Judge Advocate (post-trial) For Appellant: Major Timothy W. Thomas, JA (argued); Colonel Christopher J. O’Brien, JA; Captain Frank B. Ulmer, JA (on brief). For Appellee: Captain Nicole L. Fish, JA (argued); Colonel Denise R. Lind, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Mark H. Sydenham, JA; Major Christopher B. Burgess, JA; Captain Nicole L. Fish, JA (on brief). 10 September 2009 ---------------------------------- MEMORANDUM OPINION ---------------------------------- This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent. TOZZI, Senior Judge: An officer panel sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to her pleas, of one specification of conspiracy to commit maltreatment, four specifications of maltreatment, and one specification of indecent acts with another, in violation of Articles 81, 93, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 893, and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dishonorable discharge, three years confinement, and reduction to Private E1. The convening authority also waived 1 Judge MAGGS took final action in this case while on active duty. ENGLAND – ARMY 20051170 automatic forfeitures and credited appellant with ten days of confinement credit against the approved sentence to confinement. On appeal, appellant claims, inter alia, that (1) the military judge abused his discretion when he rejected her guilty plea; (2) appellant’s trial defense counsel were ineffective for calling Private (PVT) Charles Graner as a presentencing witness, in the alternative; and (3) information about an Article 15, UCMJ, was erroneously included in the staff judge advocate’s recommendation (SJAR).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Formula in the Battle for Fallujah | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds A New Formula in the Battle for Fallujah by Michael Knights May 25, 2016 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Michael Knights Michael Knights is the Boston-based Jill and Jay Bernstein Fellow of The Washington Institute, specializing in the military and security affairs of Iraq, Iran, and the Persian Gulf states. Articles & Testimony The campaign is Iraq's latest attempt to push militia and coalition forces into a single battlespace, and lessons from past efforts have seemingly improved their tactics. n May 22, the Iraqi government announced the opening of the long-awaited battle of Fallujah, the city only O 30 miles west of Baghdad that has been fully under the control of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant group for the past 29 months. Fallujah was a critical hub for al-Qaeda in Iraq and later ISIL in the decade before ISIL's January 2014 takeover. On the one hand it may seem surprising that Fallujah has not been liberated sooner -- after all, it has been the ISIL- controlled city closest to Baghdad for more than two years. The initial reason was that there was always something more urgent to do with Iraq's security forces. In January 2014, the Iraqi security forces were focused on preventing an ISIL takeover of Ramadi next door. The effort to retake Fallujah was judged to require detailed planning, and a hasty counterattack seemed like a pointless risk. In retrospect it may have been worth an early attempt to break up ISIL's control of the city while it was still incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebooting U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq
    Rebooting U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq MICHAEL KNIGHTS POLICY FOCUS 137 Rebooting U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq MICHAEL KNIGHTS THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publica- tion may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2015 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Design: 1000colors Photo: A Kurdish fighter keeps guard while overlooking positions of Islamic State mili- tants near Mosul, northern Iraq, August 2014. (REUTERS/Youssef Boudlal) CONTENTS Acknowledgments | v Acronyms | vi Executive Summary | viii 1 Introduction | 1 2 Federal Government Security Forces in Iraq | 6 3 Security Forces in Iraqi Kurdistan | 26 4 Optimizing U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq | 39 5 Issues and Options for U.S. Policymakers | 48 About the Author | 74 TABLES 1 Effective Combat Manpower of Iraq Security Forces | 8 2 Assessment of ISF and Kurdish Forces as Security Cooperation Partners | 43 FIGURES 1 ISF Brigade Order of Battle, January 2015 | 10 2 Kurdish Brigade Order of Battle, January 2015 | 28 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks to a range of colleagues for their encouragement and assistance in the writing of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Complaint
    Case 1:18-cv-01612-CKK Document 11 Filed 11/17/18 Page 1 of 602 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ESTATE OF ROBERT P. HARTWICK, § HALEY RUSSELL, HANNAH § HARTWICK, LINDA K. HARTWICK, § ROBERT A. HARTWICK, SHARON § SCHINETHA STALLWORTH, § ANDREW JOHN LENZ, ARAGORN § THOR WOLD, CATHERINE S. WOLD, § CORY ROBERT HOWARD, DALE M. § HINKLEY, MARK HOWARD BEYERS, § DENISE BEYERS, EARL ANTHONY § MCCRACKEN, JASON THOMAS § WOODLIFF, JIMMY OWEKA OCHAN, § JOHN WILLIAM FUHRMAN, JOSHUA § CRUTCHER, LARRY CRUTCHER, § JOSHUA MITCHELL ROUNTREE, § LEIGH ROUNTREE, KADE L. § PLAINTIFFS’ HINKHOUSE, RICHARD HINKHOUSE, § SECOND AMENDED SUSAN HINKHOUSE, BRANDON § COMPLAINT HINKHOUSE, CHAD HINKHOUSE, § LISA HILL BAZAN, LATHAN HILL, § LAURENCE HILL, CATHLEEN HOLY, § Case No.: 1:18-cv-01612-CKK EDWARD PULIDO, KAREN PULIDO, § K.P., A MINOR CHILD, MANUEL § Hon. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly PULIDO, ANGELITA PULIDO § RIVERA, MANUEL “MANNIE” § PULIDO, YADIRA HOLMES, § MATTHEW WALKER GOWIN, § AMANDA LYNN GOWIN, SHAUN D. § GARRY, S.D., A MINOR CHILD, SUSAN § GARRY, ROBERT GARRY, PATRICK § GARRY, MEGHAN GARRY, BRIDGET § GARRY, GILBERT MATTHEW § BOYNTON, SOFIA T. BOYNTON, § BRIAN MICHAEL YORK, JESSE D. § CORTRIGHT, JOSEPH CORTRIGHT, § DIANA HOTALING, HANNA § CORTRIGHT, MICHAELA § CORTRIGHT, LEONDRAE DEMORRIS § RICE, ESTATE OF NICHOLAS § WILLIAM BAART BLOEM, ALCIDES § ALEXANDER BLOEM, DEBRA LEIGH § BLOEM, ALCIDES NICHOLAS § BLOEM, JR., VICTORIA LETHA § Case 1:18-cv-01612-CKK Document 11 Filed 11/17/18 Page 2 of 602 BLOEM, FLORENCE ELIZABETH § BLOEM, CATHERINE GRACE § BLOEM, SARA ANTONIA BLOEM, § RACHEL GABRIELA BLOEM, S.R.B., A § MINOR CHILD, CHRISTINA JEWEL § CHARLSON, JULIANA JOY SMITH, § RANDALL JOSEPH BENNETT, II, § STACEY DARRELL RICE, BRENT § JASON WALKER, LELAND WALKER, § SUSAN WALKER, BENJAMIN § WALKER, KYLE WALKER, GARY § WHITE, VANESSA WHITE, ROYETTA § WHITE, A.W., A MINOR CHILD, § CHRISTOPHER F.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Official Development Assistance
    Japan’s Official Development Assistance Japan pledged up to $ 5 billion of assistance for Technical reconstruction in Iraq Cooperation (Aimed at improving various skills) Madrid Conference (October 2003) Training FY 2003 - 2011 a total of about 5,000 Iraqi people participated Loan Assistance Grant Aid in training courses $ 3.5 billion $ 1.5 billion arranged by JICA in Japan or other countries. By JICA 15 projects Emergency assistance on Electricity, Oil, Water, basic infrastructures + Reconstruction in various Transportation, Irrigation, etc. Technical sectors + 4 new Cooperation Project 3 projects in the field of ⇒ beyond $ 4.１ billion + Agriculture in KRG & Japan pledged an 1 project in field of the additional $ 100 million Agriculture Irrigation in GOI Debt Reduction of grant aid. (2007) $ 6 billion JICA ODA Loan Projects in Iraq Water Supply Improvement Project in Kurdistan Region [JP¥ 34.3 bil / US$ 303 mil] Deralok Hydropower Plant Construction Project [[JP¥JP¥ 1 17.07.0 bil / US$ 165 mil] Electricity Sector Reconstruction Project in Kurdistan Region [ [JP¥JP¥ 14.7 bil / US$ 127 mil] Water Sector Loan Project in Midwestern Iraq [[JP¥JP¥ 41 41.3.3 bil / US$ 401 mil] Health Sector Reconstruction Project [[JP¥JP¥ 10.2 bil / US$ 126 mil] Irrigation Sector Loan [[JP¥JP¥ 9.5 bil bil// US$ 86 mil] AlAl-Akkaz-Akkaz Gas Power Plant Construction Project Electricity Sector Reconstruction Project [JP[JP¥¥ 29 29.6.6 bil / US$ 287 mil] JPJP¥¥ 32.6 bil bil// US$ 281 mil] ((BaijiBaiji Refinery Upgrading Project (E/S) Baghdad Sewerage Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • Counterinsurgency in the Iraq Surge
    A NEW WAY FORWARD OR THE OLD WAY BACK? COUNTERINSURGENCY IN THE IRAQ SURGE. A thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in US History. By Matthew T. Buchanan Director: Dr. Richard Starnes Associate Professor of History, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences. Committee Members: Dr. David Dorondo, History, Dr. Alexander Macaulay, History. April, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations . iii Abstract . iv Introduction . 1 Chapter One: Perceptions of the Iraq War: Early Origins of the Surge . 17 Chapter Two: Winning the Iraq Home Front: The Political Strategy of the Surge. 38 Chapter Three: A Change in Approach: The Military Strategy of the Surge . 62 Conclusion . 82 Bibliography . 94 ii ABBREVIATIONS ACU - Army Combat Uniform ALICE - All-purpose Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment BDU - Battle Dress Uniform BFV - Bradley Fighting Vehicle CENTCOM - Central Command COIN - Counterinsurgency COP - Combat Outpost CPA – Coalition Provisional Authority CROWS- Common Remote Operated Weapon System CRS- Congressional Research Service DBDU - Desert Battle Dress Uniform HMMWV - High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle ICAF - Industrial College of the Armed Forces IED - Improvised Explosive Device ISG - Iraq Study Group JSS - Joint Security Station MNC-I - Multi-National-Corps-Iraq MNF- I - Multi-National Force – Iraq Commander MOLLE - Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment MRAP - Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (vehicle) QRF - Quick Reaction Forces RPG - Rocket Propelled Grenade SOI - Sons of Iraq UNICEF - United Nations International Children’s Fund VBIED - Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Device iii ABSTRACT A NEW WAY FORWARD OR THE OLD WAY BACK? COUNTERINSURGENCY IN THE IRAQ SURGE.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law and the 2003 Invasion of Iraq Revisited
    International Law and the 2003 Invasion of Iraq Revisited Donald K. Anton Associate Professor of Law The Australian National University College of Law Paper delivered April 30, 2013 Australian National University Asia-Pacific College of Diplomacy The Invasion of Iraq: Canadian and Australian Perspectives Seminar1 INTRODUCTION Good morning. Thank you to the organizers for inviting me to participate today in this retrospective on the 2003 invasion of Iraq. My role this morning, as I understand it, is to parse the international legal arguments surrounding the invasion and to reconsider them in the fullness of time that has elapsed. It is a role I agreed to take on with hesitation because it is difficult to add much that is new. I suppose I can take comfort in saying what I’ve already said, and saying it again today, because of how I view my obligations as an international lawyer. I believe we lawyers have a duty to stand up and insist that our leaders adhere to the rule of law in international relations and to help ensure that they are held accountable for the failure to do so. As I am sure you are all aware, much remains to be done in terms of accountability, especially in the United States, and it is disappointing that the Obama Administration has so far refused to prosecute what seem to be clear violations of the Torture Convention, including all the way up the chain of command if necessary. Today, however, my talk is confined to the legal arguments about the use of force in Iraq and an analysis of their persuasiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abu Ghraib Convictions: a Miscarriage of Justice
    Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal Volume 32 Article 4 9-1-2013 The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice Robert Bejesky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Robert Bejesky, The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice, 32 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 103 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj/vol32/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ABU GHRAIB CONVICTIONS: A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION ..................... ..... 104 II. IRAQI DETENTIONS ...............................107 A. Dragnet Detentions During the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq.........................107 B. Legal Authority to Detain .............. ..... 111 C. The Abuse at Abu Ghraib .................... 116 D. Chain of Command at Abu Ghraib ..... ........ 119 III. BASIS FOR CRIMINAL CULPABILITY ..... ..... 138 A. Chain of Command ....................... 138 B. Systemic Influences ....................... 140 C. Reduced Rights of Military Personnel and Obedience to Authority ................ ..... 143 D. Interrogator Directives ................ ....
    [Show full text]
  • UM AL-IRAQ (THE DATE PALM TREE) the Life and Work of Dr
    UM AL-IRAQ (THE DATE PALM TREE) The Life and Work of Dr. Rashad Zaydan of Iraq By Nikki Lyn Pugh, Peace Writer Edited by Kaitlin Barker Davis 2011 Women PeaceMakers Program Made possible by the Fred J. Hansen Foundation *This material is copyrighted by the Joan B. Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice. For permission to cite, contact [email protected], with “Women PeaceMakers – Narrative Permissions” in the subject line. UM AL-IRAQ (THE DATE PALM TREE) ZAYDAN – IRAQ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A Note to the Reader …………………………………………………………. 4 II. About the Women PeaceMakers Program …………………………………… 4 III. Biography of a Woman PeaceMaker — Dr. Rashad Zaydan ….……………… 5 IV. Conflict History — Iraq………………………………………………………… 7 V. Map — Iraq ……………………………………………………………………. 14 VI. Integrated Timeline — Political Developments and Personal History ………… 15 VII. Dedication …………………………………………………………………….. 22 VIII. Narrative Stories of the Life and Work of Dr. Rashad Zaydan 23 ُ UM AL-IRAQ 24 ُّ ُّ ُّ أمُّ ُّالعُّــ راق ُُُُُّّّّّ ُُُُُُُُُّّّّّّّّّ ّأولُّث ُّمَرَةُُُُُّّّّّ FIRST FRUIT 25 ُُُُّّّّالنُّ ـــشــأْة I. GROWING UP a. The Dawn’s Prayer …………………………………………………………. 26 b. Memories of Al Mansur ……………………………………………..……… II. MEHARAB AL NOOR/TEMPLES OF LIGHT 29 م ُحــرابُّالنّـــــور c. Beauty in Diversity …………………………………………………………. 31 d. The Day of Ashura ………………………………………………………… 32 e. Summer School ……………………………………………………………. 34 f. The First Spark …………………………………………………………….. 35 g. A Place for Prayer …………………………………………………………. 37 h. Postscript: The Most Advanced Degree ……………………………………. 39 ُُُُّّّّالحـــــربُّ والعقوباتُّ)الحصار(ُُُُّّّّ III. WAR AND SANCTIONS 42 َ ُ ُ ّ i. The Meaning of Marriage ………….………………………………………. 44 j. Baiji ………….……………………………………….……………………. 45 k. Wishing for Stability …………………….…………………………………. 46 l. Kuwait………………….………………………………………………….. 49 m. The Charity Clinic ………….……………………………………………… n. Postscript: The Empty House ………….………………………………….. 51 52 ا لُّحـــــــتـــــــﻻل IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Interrogation of Detainees: Extending a Hand Or a Boot?
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 41 2008 Interrogation of Detainees: Extending a Hand or a Boot? Amos N. Guiora S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, National Security Law Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Amos N. Guiora, Interrogation of Detainees: Extending a Hand or a Boot?, 41 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 375 (2008). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol41/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERROGATION OF DETAINEES: EXTENDING A HAND ORA BOOT? Amos N. Guiora* The current "war on terror" provides the Bush administrationwith a unique op- portunity to both establish clear guidelinesfor the interrogationof detainees and to make a forceful statement about American values. How the government chooses to act can promote either an ethical commitment to the norms of civil society, or an attitude analogous to Toby Keith's "American Way," where Keith sings that "you'll be sorry that you messed with the USofA, 'Cuz we'll put a boot in your ass, It's the American Way." * Professor of Law, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq
    The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq By Anthony H. Cordesman, Peter Alsis, Adam Mausner, and Charles Loi Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Revised: December 20, 2011 Note: This draft is being circulated for comments and suggestions. Please provide them to [email protected] Chapter 6: US Strategic Competition with Iran: Competition in Iraq 2 Executive Summary "Americans planted a tree in Iraq. They watered that tree, pruned it, and cared for it. Ask your American friends why they're leaving now before the tree bears fruit." --Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.1 Iraq has become a key focus of the strategic competition between the United States and Iran. The history of this competition has been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War, and the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Since the 2003 war, both the US and Iran have competed to shape the structure of Post-Saddam Iraq’s politics, governance, economics, and security. The US has gone to great lengths to counter Iranian influence in Iraq, including using its status as an occupying power and Iraq’s main source of aid, as well as through information operations and more traditional press statements highlighting Iranian meddling. However, containing Iranian influence, while important, is not America’s main goal in Iraq. It is rather to create a stable democratic Iraq that can defeat the remaining extremist and insurgent elements, defend against foreign threats, sustain an able civil society, and emerge as a stable power friendly to the US and its Gulf allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Foreign and Defense Policies
    Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies Updated May 8, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44017 SUMMARY R44017 Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies May 8, 2019 Iran’s national security policy is the product of many overlapping and sometimes competing factors such as the ideology of Iran’s Islamic revolution, perception of threats Kenneth Katzman to the regime and to the country, long-standing national interests, and the interaction of Specialist in Middle the Iranian regime’s factions and constituencies. Iran’s leadership: Eastern Affairs x Seeks to deter or thwart U.S. or other efforts to invade or intimidate Iran or to bring about a change of regime. x Has sought to take advantage of opportunities of regional conflicts to overturn a power structure in the Middle East that it asserts favors the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other Sunni Muslim Arab regimes. x Seeks to enhance its international prestige and restore a sense of “greatness” reminiscent of ancient Persian empires. x Advances its foreign policy goals, in part by providing material support to regional allied governments and armed factions. Iranian officials characterize the support as helping the region’s “oppressed” and assert that Saudi Arabia, in particular, is instigating sectarian tensions and trying to exclude Iran from regional affairs. x Sometimes disagrees on tactics and strategies. Supreme Leader Ali Khamene’i and key hardline institutions, such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), oppose any compromises of Iran’s national security core goals. Iran’s elected president, Hassan Rouhani, and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif support Iran’s integration into regional and international diplomacy.
    [Show full text]