Stephen Thomas Mergner______, Hereby Submit This Work As Part of the Requirements for the Degree Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stephen Thomas Mergner______, Hereby Submit This Work As Part of the Requirements for the Degree Of UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: May 22nd, 2006__ I, __Stephen Thomas Mergner_________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctorate of Philosophy, PhD in: Political Science, American Political Theory It is entitled: “The Implementation of the ‘Conciliated’ Model of Municipal Governance. Testing the Effectiveness Of ‘Hybrid’ Mayor Charter Reforms in Cincinnati, Ohio.” This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _Dr. Michael Margolis, PhD_____ _Dr. Alfred Tuchfarber, PhD____ _Dr. Barbara Bardes, PhD __ “The Implementation of the ‘Conciliated Model’ of Municipal Governance in Cincinnati, Ohio. Testing the Consequences of the ‘Hybrid Mayor’ Charter Reforms.” A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of Political Science of the College of Arts and Sciences May 2006 by Stephen Thomas Mergner B.A., University of Cincinnati, 1997 M.A., University of Cincinnati, 2003 Committee Chair: Dr. Michael Margolis 1 Copyright @ 2006 Stephen T. Mergner 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I cannot begin to express my thanks to all those who have offered their support over the years to complete this dream. Unquestionably, my wife Michele deserves all the accolades and praises for this achievement. Had it not been for her unwavering belief in my potential, this work would never have been completed. Far too many mortgage, car, and preschool payments have come down the line carrying with them a multitude of reasons to end this academic quest. For you Michele, I am eternally indebted. I would like to thank Stephanie Walls for all of her support and solidarity throughout graduate school. We shared virtually every class together, experienced the excitement of each other’s marriages and childbirths. Stephanie is a true friend and an academic comrade. Another constant supporter of my academic endeavors is Murphy Mergner, my beloved companion, who also happens to be my dog. Throughout all those nights of studying in graduate school, Murphy sat under the desk keeping my feet warm. Murphy never complained of another late night studying or writing and always offered her love freely. I thank my parents, Arthur and Barbara Mergner, Jr., who supported my decision to leave corporate America in search of a doctorate. I know that you hid your doubts deep inside, yet always believed that I would succeed. Once upon my academic path, you provided invaluable assistance that was both intellectually stimulating and emotionally comforting. I am so very proud to now be able to share this victory with you. The Department of Political Science at the University of Cincinnati is a wonderful place to attend graduate school. Department administrator Joe Waddle and accountant Cheryl Lindsey provided countless hours of support in helping graduate students get their paychecks and access to the raw materials that make our academic work possible. 3 Dr. Richard Harknett and the Taft Fund’s Broadcast Group was the only reason my dissertation was financially possible. His constant advocacy for my urban studies research resulted in an extremely generous grant of $12,000 over three years. Without this funding I would have had virtually no income. James Robert Masterson provided invaluable research advice as he assisted in bringing my SPSS skills back up to speed. Jim spent two long nights rowing through my datasets and tests with me to make sure they were all set up correctly. Jim’s advice shaved at least a year off my dissertation completion time. My dissertation chair, Dr. Michael Margolis, was incredibly supportive of my topic. He constantly encouraged my investigations and he challenged me to produce a level of work higher than I believed myself capable of producing. Dr. Margolis provided extremely swift and detailed reviews of my drafts and I always felt as if I was his only concern. Dr. Alfred Tuchfarber and Dr. Barbara Bardes both provided invaluable assistance in gathering background history and in setting up my datasets. They both believed in my research and made my work feel attainable and valuable. I could not have hoped for a better dissertation committee. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Abstract 8 II. Review of the Literature a. Corruption and the Rise of Progressive Reform 10 b. Weaknesses of the Strong Council Model 13 c. The Adapted City and the Adapted Mayor Model 14 III. Research Design a. Empirical Test of the Hybrid Governmental Model 18 b. The Cincinnati Experience; 20 Strong Mayor Rule in a Hierarchical City c. The At-Large, Nine-X Reforms; 20 The Beginning of Adapted-Strong Council Reforms d. The Top-Vote-Getter Reform; 24 Continued Adapted-Strong Council Reforms e. The Hybrid Mayor Reform Movement; 25 Cincinnati as a Hybrid City f. Development of the Null Hypotheses 29 5 g. Quantifiable Testing; Research Procedures, Data and Methods 34 i. Legislative Leadership and Party Unity 36 ii. Committee Assignments 38 iii. Political Participation 39 iv. Media Perception 41 h. Implications of Research 45 IV. Results of Testing a. Statistical Analysis of Each Hypothesis i. Hypothesis # 1: Legislative Leadership 46 ii. Hypothesis # 2: Party Unity 53 iii. Hypothesis # 3: Committee Chair Assignments 66 iv. Hypothesis # 4: Political Participation 69 v. Sub- Hypothesis to #4: Issue 4 Support 72 5a. Party Affiliation 78 5b. Race 83 5c. Level of Education 89 6 5d. Median Family Income 93 vi. Hypothesis # 5: Media Perception 99 b. Conclusions: Judging Luken’s First Term 103 c. Implications for Future Research 121 V. Attachments a. Bibliography 125 b. #1 Sample Newspaper Coding Sheets 131 c. #2 IOC Source Sheet 6 Years 133 d. #3 Party Affiliation of Chairmanships 12 Years 134 #4 Box Plot for Median Family Income 135 7 I. ABSTRACT The City of Cincinnati has experienced a wave of governmental reform of a magnitude that has not been felt since the 1920s. Frustrated with racial unrest, a lack of accountability and legislative inefficiencies, local political leaders and public activists called for greater accountability and decisiveness from their urban government. Blame for these failures landed squarely upon the backs of the City Council and the weak Mayor system. As a consequence of this pressure, Cincinnati reformed its city charter to incorporate a ‘Hybrid’ Model of municipal governance. This is not just a specific modification of the current charter, rather it is an attempt at a full governmental reform in order to change the very seat of legislative and leadership power. Within the field of political science, urban governance literature is founded solidly upon qualitative case study research. Because of the time consuming nature of gathering, encoding and statistically analyzing large volumes of data, the study of the impact of charter reform measures has remained relatively devoid of quantitative research. This dissertation offers a quantitative based analysis that reveals that there are certain statistically significant consequences that have resulted from this governmental reform. My research analyzes five critical hypotheses that the qualitative scholarly literature and political reformers determined would change as the result of a city adopting this governing model. Hypotheses tested involve Legislative Leadership, Party Unity, Committee Assignments, Media Perception and Political Participation. This dissertation illustrates that the primary consequences of reform have occurred within three areas; First, an increase in party unity within the (minority) Republican Party. Secondly, an increase in negative attitude towards the Hybrid Mayor 8 post-reform in the city’s newspaper reports. Third, a small increase in the percentage of ordinances the mayor proposed before Council. The results of this analysis argue that the expectation of broad changes within municipal governance has not occurred. These findings suggest that more drastic shifts in the structure of power are necessary if major changes are desired. 9 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: CORRUPTION AND PROGRESSIVE REFORM Before the municipal reforms of the Progressive era were enacted, the Mayor- Council Model dominated America’s municipal landscape. Versions of this form of government were found throughout all local, state and national governments and represented what was believed to be the natural distribution of power in a republic. It was generally understood that in order to have a successful republican form of government one must have separate political institutions sharing power within a structure of checks and balances. Also know as the “Strong Mayor” Model, the Mayor-Council system represents the hierarchical structure of government in its purest form. (Frederickson, et al., 2003). The system’s core source of motivation is within the competition of political parties for the control of legislative and administrative power. By winning seats in political posts, a party takes the reins of government and will be accountable to the voters at the next election. One key weakness within this model is its assumptions of both fair, competitive elections and a lack of corruption. The end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries witnessed what is arguably municipal democracy at its worst. The era is best described with terms such as corruption, bossism, favoritism, and patronage (Hansel, p.1, 2003). The party boss was the central figure and he carefully dispensed city jobs to his “trustees” in exchange for their loyal service and votes. City contracts and construction permits were dispensed as political patronage (Patton, p.18, 1981). It was commonly believed that there was little, if any, hope of the creation of an honest municipal government. 10 How widespread was the problem of corruption? It is not clear as to a percentage but it is generally accepted that the “perception” of universal corruption was accepted. The trend to reform government began at the federal level with the 1883 Pendleton Act that established the Civil Service Commission and brought about merit-based reforms.
Recommended publications
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Amandamjones.CCAO
    DECEMBER 15, 2006 PAY BILL UPDATE During the CCAO/CEAO Winter Conference, Republican Legislative Leaders made it clear there was not adequate support for an elected officials pay bill yet this year. CCAO and other local officials associations have been advocating for a pay bill, particularly since county commissioners and auditors elected in November are scheduled to receive an annual adjustment during the first two years of their next term of office, but no adjustment in the last two years. Specifically, Ohio law provides township, county and state officials with raises in 2007 and 2008 that is the lesser of either 3 percent or the consumer price index (CPI). Yet, there is nothing in the law that speaks to a raise in 2009 or 2010. Ohio Constitution prohibits elected officials from receiving a raise legislatively enacted during their current term of office. Efforts are still being made to see if there would be support for “placeholder” language that would enable the off-year commissioner to receive a raise in 2009 and 2010, should the legislature take action in 2007 or 2008. The language provides that all three commissioners in a county shall receive the same wage, to put it simply. It is CCAO’s understanding that this “Plan B” option currently is under consideration in the Senate, but there has not been a commitment to support it yet by Leadership. Commissioners are urged to talk to their State Senator about this “Plan B” approach and we believe the amendment could be offered to the Capital Improvements Bill, H.B. 699 FLURRY OF ACTIVITY AS LEGISLATURE & TAFT ADMINISTRATION PREPARE FOR WRAP- UP Bills are quickly moving through the Legislature in anticipation for the 126th General Assembly to wrap up the week of December 19; though session is scheduled through December 21st, there is a push to wrap up on the 19th if possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Cincinnati Fundraisers and Incumbents Win
    Top Cincinnati fundraisers and incumbents win For immediate release October 23, 2002 Contact Catherine Turcer, (513) 221-2100 CINCINNATI -- The top fundraising candidates for Mayor and Cincinnati City Council won in 2001, according to a report released today by Ohio Citizen Action. The winning candidate for Mayor, incumbent Charlie Luken, raised 3.9 times more than his three challengers. All of the incumbent candidates also won in 2001. The average incumbent raised 3.7 times more than the average non-incumbent. "Contributions don’t necessarily make victory more likely," said Catherine Turcer, campaign reform director for Ohio Citizen Action. "Often, favor-seekers contribute to a candidate precisely because their victory at the polls is already a foregone conclusion. They want to curry favor with someone who can reciprocate after the election." "Cincinnati’s old campaign financing system, however," Turcer said, "is clearly stacked against challengers and less well-funded candidates." Contribution totals were similar during 1997 ($2,322,158), 1999 ($2,421,109) and 2001 ($2,461,993), according to a report released today by Ohio Citizen Action. 1997 contribution limits, however, changed the giving patterns. The 1997 limits restricted labor unions and Political Action Committees (PACs) and individual limits led some to use family members to inflate contributions. "Cincinnati campaign contributions study," (70 KB .doc). ​ ​ 2001 campaign finance profiles, (13 KB .doc): ● Mayoral candidates: Charlie Luken, Courtis Fuller, William Brodberger, Michael Riley. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ● Winning candidates for Cincinnati City Council: Paul Booth, Minette Cooper, John ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Cranley, David Crowley, Pat DeWine, Chris Monzel, David Pepper, Alicia Reece, Jim ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Tarbell. ​ ● Losing candidates for Cincinnati City Council: Jane Anderson, Ken Anderson, Toni ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Andrews, Theophilas Barnes, Lawra Baumann, Y.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Meeting Minutes
    THE MINUTES OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE CINCINNATI SOUTHERN RAILWAY January 28, 2019 A special meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Cincinnati Southern Railway (the "Board") was held on Monday, January 28, 2019 at 3 p.m. at the Queen City Club, 331 E. 4th St, Cincinnati, OH 45202. Thomas Kilcoyne, Paul Sylvester, Charlie Luken, Paul Muething, and Mark Mallory were all present. William Weber, Assistant City Solicitor, and Tim Riordan, a former Trustee, were in attendance as well. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Weber presented the Board with the draft minutes from the December 11, 2018 regular meeting. The Board reviewed them. Mr. Luken moved to approve, and Mr. Kilcoyne seconded. Unanimously approved. TAX CREDIT AGREEMENTS Mr. Weber provided a history of and update on the tax credit agreements entered into between the Board and the lessee of the railway; the status of the Memorandum of Understanding (as amended, the "MOU") previously entered into between the City of Cincinnati (the "City") and the Board and related to the tax credit agreements; and the current status of the City's use of funds remitted from the Board pursuant to that MOU. The Board discussed the level of cash reserves being held by the Board and the foreseeable expenses relating to re-negotiation of the railway lease. Following the discussion, Mr. Sylvester made a motion to remit to the City $1.9 million dollars by the end of May 2019, with such funds comprised of the amount to be paid to the City pursuant to the terms of the MOU and also excess funds not needed for foreseeable expenses of the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Reference Library US-04-09 Vertical Files
    City of Cincinnati Municipal Reference Library US-04-09 Vertical Files File Cabinet 1 Drawer 1 1. A3MC Proposed Merger Cincinnati Enquirer and Post 1977 and 1978 2. No Folder Name 3. A33 Cincinnati Post 4. A33 Cincinnati Enquirer 5. A33 Sale of the Enquirer 6. A33 Cincinnati Kurier 7. A33 Newspapers and Magazines 8. Navy 9. A34 Copying, Processes, Printing, Mimeographing, Microfilming 10. A34C Carts, Codes Cincinnati 11. A45Mc General Public Reports (Cincinnati City Bulletin Progress) 12. A49Mc Name- Cincinnati’s “Cincinnati and Queen City of the West 2” 13. Cincinnati- Nourished and Protected by the River that Gave It by William H. Hessler 14. Cincinnati-Name-Flower-Flag-Seal-Key-Songs 15. A49so Ohio 16. Last Edition Printed by the Cincinnati Time-Star July 19, 1958 17. Ohio Sesquicentennial Celebration 18. A6 O/Ohio History-Historical Societies 19. A6mc General Information (I) Cincinnati 20. General Information 2 Cincinnati 21. Cincinnati Geological Society 22. Cincinnati’s Birthdays 23. Pictures of Old Cincinnati 24. A6mc Historical Society- Cincinnati 25. A6mc Famous Cincinnati Families (Enquirer Series 1980) 26. A6mc President Reagan’s Visit to Cincinnati 12/11/81 27. A6mc Pres. Fords Visit to Cincinnati July 1975 and October 28, 1976 28. A6c Famous People Who have Visited Cincinnati 29. A Brief Sketch of the History of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Chamber of Commerce 30. Cincinnati History 31. History of Cincinnati 1950? 32. Cincinnati 1924 33. Cincinnati 1926 34. Cincinnati 1928 35. Cincinnati 1930 36. Cincinnati 1931 37. Cincinnati 1931 38. Cincinnati 1932 39. Cincinnati 1932 40. Cincinnati 1933 41. Cincinnati 1935 42.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Rules Cincinnati?
    Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate
    [Show full text]
  • Council Structures Throughout the United States Overview for the 2016 Charter Review Committee
    Council structures throughout the United States Overview for the 2016 Charter Review Committee Presentation by J. Edward Johnson, Director of Legislative Affairs for Columbus City Council (as prepared for delivery) Good evening members of the Charter Review Committee. My name is Edward Johnson and I am the Director of Legislative Affairs for Columbus City Council. Chair Coe asked staff to offer an overview of the structures of municipal government throughout the United States and to provide committee members with data on the top 15 largest cities in Ohio and to offer the committee a brief overview on how Columbus City Council works. First, an overview of the forms of municipal government, with an acknowledgment of the assistance of the National League of Cities for providing much of the following information. Forms of Municipal Government The first form I will introduce members to is the mayor-council form of government, which is the category Columbus falls into. Primary characteristics of mayor-council governments include: The mayor is elected separate from the council, is often full-time and paid, with significant administrative and budgetary authority; Depending on the municipal charter, the mayor could have “weak” or “strong” powers – in Columbus’ case we have a strong mayor system: o Strong mayors are the chief executives of cities, centralizing executive power: . The mayor directs the administrative structure, appoints and removes department heads; . May exercise veto powers; . The council does not oversee daily operations of city government o Weak mayors have a powerful council, with both legislative and executive authority: . The mayor is not truly the chief executive officer, and has limited or no veto powers; 1 Council structures throughout the United States Overview for the 2016 Charter Review Committee .
    [Show full text]
  • U R B a N LIFE And
    URBAN LIFE and URBAN LANDSCAPE SERIES CINCINNATI'S OVER-THE-RHINE AND TWENTIETH-CENTURY URBANISM Zane L. Miller and Bruce Tucker OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Columbus Copyright © 1998 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Miller, Zane L. Changing plans for America's inner cities : Cincinnati's Over-The-Rhine and twentieth-century urbanism / Zane L. Miller and Bruce Tucker. p. cm. — (Urban life and urban landscape series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0762-6 (cloth : alk. paper).—ISBN 0-8142-0763-4 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Urban renewal—Ohio—Cincinnati—History. 2. Over-the-Rhine (Cincinnati, Ohio)—History. I. Tucker, Bruce, 1948­ . 11. Title. III. Series. HT177.C53M55 1997 307.3'416'0977178—dc21 97-26206 CIP Text and jacket design by Gary Gore. Type set in ITC New Baskerville by Wilsted & Taylor Publishing Services. Printed by Thomson-Shore. The paper in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 For Henry List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction: Why Cincinnati, Why Over-the-Rhine? xv Prologue: 1850s-1910s 1 PART ONE ZONING, RAZING, OR REHABILITATION Introduction: From Cultural Engineering to Cultural Individualism 9 1 Social Groups, Slums, and Comprehensive Planning, 1915-1944 13 2 Neighborhoods and a Community, 1948-1960 29 PART TWO NEW VISIONS AND VISIONARIES Introduction: Community Action and
    [Show full text]
  • SWARTSELL-MASTERSREPORT-2013.Pdf (346.7Kb)
    DISCLAIMER: This document does not meet current format guidelines Graduate School at the The University of Texas at Austin. of the It has been published for informational use only. The Report Committee for Nikolas R Swartsell Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: William Minutaglio Co-Supervisor: Robert Jensen Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities by Nikolas R. Swartsell, B.A. Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2013 ii Abstract Turning the City Inside Out Shifting Demographics in American Cities Nikolas R. Swartsell, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: William Minutaglio Narratives around many of America's inner-city neighborhoods have changed significantly in the past decade. Once portrayed by the media and pop-culture as blighted, dangerous areas to be avoided, these neighborhoods have become hip epicenters of a new philosophy in urban planning-- "place-making," a concept popularized by economist and urbanist Richard Florida. Place-making claims to be a kinder, friendlier kind of urban renewal emphasizing tolerance and diversity-- but is this the case? Through both physical changes and city-lead branding efforts, place-making seeks to draw young professionals, specifically those in the rising "creative class," to inner city areas in hopes these young workers will in turn draw employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Xavier Newswire Volume XCV Published Since 1915 by the Students of Xavier University Issue 10
    Xavier University Exhibit All Xavier Student Newspapers Xavier Student Newspapers 2009-10-28 Xavier University Newswire Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio) Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper Recommended Citation Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio), "Xavier University Newswire" (2009). All Xavier Student Newspapers. 574. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/student_newspaper/574 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Xavier Student Newspapers at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Xavier Student Newspapers by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. October 28, 2009 XAVIER NEWSWIRE Volume XCV Published since 1915 by the students of Xavier University Issue 10 AlwaYS ONLINE: xavier.edu/ BASKETBALL PREVIEW newswire inside Eight pages of coverage on the upcoming men’s and women’s season @ Sustainability Day focuses on Xavier’s environmental commitment, actions BY SARAH WIETEN University Chicago, spoke on the ed remarks from President Fr. Campus News Editor unique sustainability efforts her Michael Graham, S.J., who noted campus has undertaken, including how far the university had come Sustainability Day, took place a program to power their shuttle but that more work could be yesterday October 27th in Cintas system with biodiesel created from done in the field of sustainabil- Center in front of an audience of vegetable oil waste from their din- ity especially in light of the new over 100 students and about
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter
    Chapter 5 U.S. Export Facilities and Ocean Transportation U.S. grains are exported from every coast in the country, as well as from the St. Lawrence Seaway in Canada. Each of the five export ranges that handle feed grains exports has a unique relationship with one or more interior producing regions. This relationship is characterized by the principal mode of transportation used to bring those feed grains into an export position. Long before the first European explorer reached the majestic sweep of the Mississippi River, Native Americans were using it for travel and trade. The Mississippi River has evolved since then into a transportation gateway to the interior of the United States. Mississippi A fleet of over 10,000 barges, towed by as many as 2,000 towboats, River/Center ply the river with many different kinds of cargo. There are nearly Gulf 6,000 miles of navigable river in the Mississippi River Basin serving the Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Illinois, Arkansas, Tennessee, White, Cumberland, Alabama and Minnesota Rivers. Through this system, river transportation reaches into every Corn Belt state, providing easy access to 80 percent of U.S. corn production, more than 33 percent of sorghum production and up to 15 percent of barley production. Hundreds of river terminals receive feed grains by truck or rail and transfer it into barges, each carrying approximately 1,500 tons, which are collected into tows of six or more barges and moved downriver to New Orleans or another river port. Barge transportation is traded actively between suppliers and users, quoted in percentage of tariff, and a cost schedule established with prices for each river shipping point.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island's Dorr Rebellion and Bay State Politics, 1842-1843 by Erik
    108 Historical Journal of Massachusetts • Summer 2011 Attorney Thomas W. Dorr (1805-54) 109 “Let the People Remember!”: Rhode Island’s Dorr Rebellion and Bay State Politics, 1842-1843 ERIK J. CHAPUT Editor’s Introduction: In 1842 a group of Rhode Island reformers took up arms in order to remove the state’s archaic form of government. The origins of the brief, but tumultuous, insurrection lay deep in Rhode Island history. The results, however, deeply impacted politics in Massachusetts. Beginning in 1776, all of the original thirteen colonies, except Connecticut and Rhode Island, wrote new constitutions and set up representative governments. The spark that led Providence attorney Thomas Wilson Dorr (1805- 54) to move from a war of words to the field of battle involved the continued reliance on the 1663 colonial charter as the state’s governing document. As John Quincy Adams noted in his diary on May 10, 1842, Dorr had taken steps to “achieve a revolution in government” because Rhode Island still “adhered” to the charter.1 Rhode Island’s colonial charter, which was still used as the state’s governing document as late as 1842, contained no amendment procedure and restricted suffrage to landowners possessing $134 of real estate. Because of the property qualification for voting, most of the populations of the growing commercial and manufacturing districts were disenfranchised. Indeed, only 40% of the state’s white male population was eligible to vote by 1840. Historical Journal of Massachusetts, Vol. 39 (1 & 2), Summer 2011 © Institute for Massachusetts Studies, Westfield State University 110 Historical Journal of Massachusetts • Summer 2011 Thomas Dorr was the scion of an old Yankee family.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Unions Attacked the Single Transferable Vote in Cincinnati∗
    Bad for Party Discipline: Why Unions Attacked the Single Transferable Vote in Cincinnati∗ Jack Santucci [email protected] This version: June 28, 2017 Original: July 22, 2015 The years around World War I brought major political changes to advanced industrial democracies. New demands led to rapid extensions of voting rights, mass defections to labor- based parties, and the adoption of proportional representation (PR) voting schemes.1 The last of these is the most important cause of a multi-party system.2 Roughly speaking, if a party gets ten percent of votes, it gets ten percent of legislative seats. Political scientists have long observed that social democracy thrives under PR.3 Oftentimes, as in Australia, Germany, and Switzerland, local PR experiments predated a national adoption.4 The United States was not immune to the global changes in party systems. Women won the vote in 1920, officially doubling electorates in states that had not yet granted voting rights.5 Third-party presidential runs in 1912 and 1924 shook the Republican Party in the Mountain States and American Midwest. This intra-party fighting continued in cities where reformers rewrote voting rules to eject the old-style parties from power.6 From 1915-48, in fact, the chosen reform in 24 cities was proportional representation. ∗Jasmine Underwood provided research assistance. Bill Collins, Jack Lucas, Colin Moore, Hans Noel, Rob Richie, and Kent Weaver gave helpful feedback on earlier drafts. Bill Gradison gave important insight into local history. 1 Compared to PR systems in
    [Show full text]