DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive and Legislative Bodies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive and Legislative Bodies Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) Under the Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation [1] the people are sovereign, and hence the supreme political authority. All Swiss citizens who have reached the age of 18 and are of sound mind have the right to vote and may be elected. In the canton of Glarus people have the right to vote and to be elected at cantonal and communal level at the age of 16. Foreign nationals do not have the right to vote or to be elected at federal level. In some cantons foreign nationals may vote and be elected at cantonal and/or communal level. The people can obtain a complete or partial revision of the Federal Constitution through a popular initiative (right to initiate legislation), by collecting the signatures of 100,000 eligible voters within a period of 18 months. All amendments of the Federal Constitution, accession to organisations for collective security or to supranational communities, and certain emergency federal acts must be put to a mandatory referendum, i.e. a popular vote must be carried out on these submissions. The adoption of an amendment of the Federal Constitution (initiated by a popular initiative or by a mandatory referendum) requires the double majority, i.e. a popular majority (majority of valid votes nationwide) and a state majority (majority of cantons in which the voters have approved the submission). Federal laws, certain emergency federal acts and certain international treaties must be submitted to an optional referendum. Within a period of 100 days of the official publication of the decree signatures must be collected from 50,000 eligible voters. If a vote is carried out through an optional referendum, a popular majority is sufficient to carry the vote. There is no constitutional jurisdiction in Switzerland: the Federal Court cannot check the constitutionality of federal laws. At cantonal level new laws and legislative amendments can also be carried out through a popular initiative. The period of time and number of signatures required for cantonal and communal popular initiatives and for optional referenda vary from canton to canton. The Confederation Switzerland is federal in structure and is divided into three political levels: the Confederation, cantons and communes. There is a separation of the legislative, executive and judicial powers at all three levels. The Confederation performs the tasks assigned to it by the Federal Constitution. The cantons decide what tasks they perform within the scope of their responsibilities. The Confederation undertakes only those tasks which the cantons cannot carry out alone or which require uniform regulation by the Confederation. The Confederation allows the cantons adequate sources of funding and helps ensure that they have the necessary financial means to perform their tasks. The Confederation is, moreover, responsible for foreign policy, security policy, defence, energy policy and for law-making which applies nationwide. Legislation in the sphere of civil law and civil procedural law, and of criminal law and criminal procedural law, also falls within the responsibility of the Confederation. Bern is the federal capital: the seat of the federal government and of the national parliament is in Bern. The parliament (legislative power) The parliament [2] consists of two chambers: the National Council (200 seats) the Council of States (46 seats) The National Council represents the population of Switzerland as a whole. The cantons are represented in the National Council in proportion to their population. Cantons with a small population have at least one seat. The most populous canton, Zurich, provides 35 members. The Council of States represents the 26 cantons. Regardless of its population each canton sends two representatives to the Council of States, with the exception of the six former half-cantons, which send just one each. Both Councils act separately: all topics are dealt with successively by each Council. The Presidents of each Council determine in each case which Council will deal with a given issue first (the “first Council”). The National Council and the Council of States act together as the United Federal Assembly [3], if elections are to be held (e.g. Federal Council elections, elections of federal judges) or if conflicts of competence between the supreme federal authorities are to be decided. Both Councils are elected directly by the people. In most cantons both chambers are elected on the same date. In all cantons in which more than one seat is to be distributed the distribution of seats on the National Council is carried out on the basis of proportional representation: the seats are distributed proportionate to the number of votes obtained. In the cantons with only one seat on the National Council, majority voting comes into play: whoever obtains most votes is elected. In all cantons with the exception of Jura and Neuenburg the Council of States elections are based on the majority voting system. The members of both Councils are elected for four years and exercise their mandate on a part-time basis (militia system). The National Council and the Council of States usually meet in four ordinary sessions per year, each of three weeks. The sessions are public. Both Councils have standing committees which prepare the issues to be dealt with and file the corresponding motions at their respective Council. As the legislature both chambers discuss all amendments to the Constitution before these are submitted to a popular vote. They also decide on the enactment, amendment or repeal of federal laws. They reach federal decisions, approve international treaties, supervise the Federal Administration, decide among others on the preliminary federal budget (amount of revenues and expenditures to be approved) and examine and approve the actual state budget. The Federal Council (executive power) The Federal Council [4] has seven members. The members of the Federal Council and the Federal Chancellor are each elected by the United Federal Assembly (National Council and Council of States) for a four-year term of office. The United Federal Assembly elects the Federal President from among the seven members of the Federal Council for a one-year term. The Federal Council is the supreme governing and executive authority of the Confederation. The Federal Chancellor heads the Federal Council’s general staff office, the Federal Chancellery [5]. Under the Federal Constitution (Art. 177) the principle of collegiality applies: the Federal Council reaches its decisions as a collegial body. The members of the Federal Council represent the decisions of the college even if they personally hold a minority position. Each member of the Federal Council heads one of the seven Departments of the Federal Administration [6]: Federal Department of Foreign Affairs [7] (FDFA) Federal Department of Home Affairs [8] (FDHA) Federal Department of Justice and Police [9] (FDJP) Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport [10] (DDPS) Federal Department of Finance [11] (FDF) Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research [12] (EAER) Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications [13] (DETEC) The primary responsibility for education lies with the cantons, which have sole responsibility for compulsory education. In the post-compulsory education sector, the Confederation and the Cantons share responsibility within the scope of their responsibilities. The duties of the Confederation in those sectors of education in which it is competent are assumed by the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research [12] (EAER) through the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation [14] (SERI). The cantons The 26 cantons [15] (states) are sovereign, except where their sovereignty is limited by the Federal Constitution (Art. 3). The cantons exercise all rights which are not assigned to the Confederation. All cantons have the same rights of intervention at federal level. Each canton has its own constitution, its own parliament, its own government and its own courts. The institution of the Landsgemeinde or cantonal assembly as the supreme organ of the canton remains only in the cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus. In these two cantons eligible voters gather in their main town and take decisions on cantonal matters by a raising of hands. In all other cantons eligible voters decide at the ballot box. Cooperation between the cantons is institutionalised in various conferences. The aim of inter-cantonal cooperation is to promote cooperation between the cantons and between the Confederation and cantons in a specific area. The directors of the individual cantonal departments/directorates of the 26 cantonal governments thus coordinate their fields of activity in their own Switzerland-wide directors’ conferences. In education and culture, the Swiss Conference of Cantonal Ministers of Education [16] (EDK) coordinates the fields of activity of the cantons at national level. As well as national directors’ conferences for Switzerland as a whole there are also regional directors’ conferences which coordinate specific fields of activity. The cantonal parliaments (legislative power) The cantonal parliaments [17], known by different names depending on the canton (Kantonsrat, Grosser Rat, Landrat, Grand Conseil, Parlement, Gran Consiglio), are as a rule elected by the people for four years. The number of members varies greatly between the cantons, and ranges at present from 50 members in the canton of Appenzell Innerrhoden (one member per 300 residents) to 180 members in the canton of Zurich. In most cantons, members are elected by proportional representation: the seats are distributed proportionate to the number of votes obtained. Members of parliament exercise their office part-time. The cantonal parliaments adopt laws and ordinances, and supervise the government and the administration and the management of the court. The cantonal governments (executive power) The cantonal governments [18] (known as the Regierungsrat, Staatsrat, Landeskommission, Conseil d’État, Gouvernement or Consiglio di Stato depending on the canton) are elected by the people in all cantons.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Swiss Economy Cantonal Competitiveness Indicator 2019: Update Following the Swiss Tax Reform (STAF)
    Swiss economy Cantonal Competitiveness Indicator 2019: Update following the Swiss tax reform (STAF) Chief Investment Office GWM | 23 May 2019 3:12 pm BST | Translation: 23 May 2019 Katharina Hofer, Economist, [email protected]; Matthias Holzhey, Economist, [email protected]; Maciej Skoczek, CFA, CAIA, Economist, [email protected] Cantonal Competitiveness Indicator 2019 Following the adoption of the tax reform (STAF) on 19 • 1 ZG 0 = rank change versus previous year 100.0 May 2019, the canton of Zug remains the most competitive 2 BS +1 90.6 canton, as in 2018. Basel-Stadt has overtaken the canton of 3 ZH - 1 90.1 Zurich. 4 VD +3 75.2 5 AG - 1 74.3 • The cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus boast the 6 NW +2 72.4 most attractive cost environments. The canton of Bern has 7 SZ - 2 71.3 lost some of its tax appeal. 8 LU - 2 71.2 9 BL 0 71.1 • The tax reform burdens cantons' finances to different 10 GE +1 69.8 extents. In the near term, the cantons of Geneva and Basel- 11 TG - 1 66.7 Stadt are likely to lose revenue from profit tax. 12 SH 0 66.1 13 FR +1 62.9 14 SG - 1 62.8 Following the approval of tax reforms (STAF) in a recent referendum, 15 OW +3 58.6 cantons now need to make changes to their profits taxes. Although 16 AR +1 57.3 some cantons announced considerable cuts to profit taxes prior to 17 SO - 1 55.8 18 GL +4 55.5 the voting, others were more reluctant.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Democracy an Overview of the International IDEA Handbook © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2008
    Direct Democracy An Overview of the International IDEA Handbook © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2008 International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The map presented in this publication does not imply on the part of the Institute any judgement on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of such boundaries, nor does the placement or size of any country or territory reflect the political view of the Institute. The map is created for this publication in order to add clarity to the text. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: International IDEA SE -103 34 Stockholm Sweden International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications. Cover design by: Helena Lunding Map design: Kristina Schollin-Borg Graphic design by: Bulls Graphics AB Printed by: Bulls Graphics AB ISBN: 978-91-85724-54-3 Contents 1. Introduction: the instruments of direct democracy 4 2. When the authorities call a referendum 5 Procedural aspects 9 Timing 10 The ballot text 11 The campaign: organization and regulation 11 Voting qualifications, mechanisms and rules 12 Conclusions 13 3. When citizens take the initiative: design and political considerations 14 Design aspects 15 Restrictions and procedures 16 Conclusions 18 4. Agenda initiatives: when citizens can get a proposal on the legislative agenda 19 Conclusions 21 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 631.230.1 Interkantonale Vereinbarung Über Die Hochschule Für Heilpädagogik Zürich 1
    631.230.1 Interkantonale Vereinbarung über die Hochschule für Heilpädagogik Zürich 1 (Vom 21. September 1999) Die Kantone Zürich, Schwyz, Obwalden, Glarus, Zug, Solothurn, Schaffhausen, Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Appenzell Innerrhoden, St. Gallen, Graubünden, Aar- gau und Thurgau vereinbaren: I. Allgemeine Bestimmungen § 1 Träger 1 Die Kantone Zürich, Schwyz, Obwalden, Glarus, Zug, Solothurn, Schaffhausen, Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Appenzell Innerrhoden, St. Gallen, Graubünden, Aar- gau und Thurgau errichten und führen gemeinsam eine Hochschule für Heilpä- dagogik (Heilpädagogische Hochschule HfH, nachfolgend Hochschule). 2 Das Fürstentum Liechtenstein kann der Vereinbarung mit den gleichen Rech- ten und Pflichten wie die eines Trägerkantons beitreten. § 2 Rechtsnatur und Sitz 1 Die Hochschule ist eine öffentlich-rechtliche Anstalt mit eigener Rechtsper- sönlichkeit und mit dem Recht auf Selbstverwaltung. 2 Sitz der Hochschule ist Zürich. § 3 Aufgabe der Hochschule 1 Die Hochschule dient der Aus- und Weiterbildung von heilpädagogischen Lehr- kräften und von pädagogisch-therapeutischem Fachpersonal. 2 Die Hochschule betreibt in ihrem Tätigkeitsgebiet anwendungorientierte For- schungs- und Entwicklungsarbeit und erbringt für Dritte Dienstleistungen. 3 Die Tätigkeit der Hochschule richtet sich, soweit erforderlich, nach den Vor- schriften des Bundes, interkantonaler Vereinbarungen und gegebenenfalls der Trägerkantone über die Anerkennung der von der Hochschule erteilten Ausweise und Diplome. 4 Die Hochschule nimmt auf die Bedürfnisse behinderter Studierender Rück- sicht. § 4 Freiheit von Lehre und Forschung Die Freiheit von Lehre und Forschung ist im Rahmen der Ausbildungsziele der Hochschule gewährleistet. SRSZ 1.1.2015 1 631.230.1 § 5 Studienrichtungen 1. Ausbildungsstufe und –bereiche 1 Die Hochschule bildet im Rahmen von Aus- und Weiterbildung und unter Berücksichtigung der berufs-, fach- und funktionsspezifischen Bedürfnisse in folgenden Bereichen aus: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In Innerrhoden Wandern Die Patienten Ab
    29. August 2020 Seite 23 Auflage 99'312 Ex. St. Galler Tagblatt GES Reichweite 249'000 Leser 9001 St. Gallen Erscheint 6 x woe Fläche 69'000 mm2 Christoph Zweili Wert 8'400 CHF InIn InInnerrhodennerrhoden wandernwandern diedie PaPatiententienten abab KaKantonsübergreifendentonsübergreifende PatientenströmePatientenströme stellenstellen dasdas GesundheitswesenGesundheitswesen inin Frage.Frage. DerDer RufRuf nachnach VersorgungsregionenVersorgungsregionen wirdwird lalauter.uter. ChriChristophstoph ZwZweilieili lungen nach den Kantonen Zürich und GeGehtht es um diedie eigeneeigene Gesundheit,Gesundheit, lungen nach den Kantonen Zürich und AkutspiAkutspitälerntälern jährjährlichlich 757500 MiMillionenllionen spielen die Kantonsgrenzen für die Bern schweizweit zu den Kantonen mit spielen die Kantonsgrenzen für die Bern schweizweit zu den Kantonen mit FFrankenranken GeGesundheitskostensundheitskosten spsparen»,aren», der grössten Zuwanderung. Dies zeigt meismeistenten PaPatiententienten keinekeine Rolle.Rolle. InIn drdreiei der grössten Zuwanderung. Dies zeigt ssagtagt PatrickPatrick Schwendener,Schwendener, Gesund¬Gesund- eine neue Studie des Krankenversiche- vovonn viervier OsOstschweizertschweizer KaKantonenntonen wawan-n- eine neue Studie des Krankenversiche- heitsexperte bei PwC Schweiz. «Für rers Helsana (siehe Grafik). «Diese re- heitsexperte bei PwC Schweiz. «Für dedernrn die PaPatiententienten ab,ab, sisiee lalassenssen sisichch inin rers Helsana (siehe Grafik). «Diese re- das gesamte Gesundheitswesen wäre lativ hohe Zuwanderung ist
    [Show full text]
  • Robin, K., Ruhlé, C., and Nigg, H. Translocation of Lynx to Northeastern Switzerland: the Project LUNO – Its History and Structures
    Robin, K., Ruhlé, C., and Nigg, H. Translocation of lynx to northeastern Switzerland: the project LUNO – its history and structures. Environmental encounters 58, 73-75. 2003. Council of Europe Publishing. 7-5-2003. Keywords: Alps/history/LUNO/lynx/Lynx lynx/Malme/project/translocation/ management/concept/environment/forest/landscape/population/longterm/survival/restoration Abstract: LUNO (Luchsumsiedlung Nordostschweiz = Translocation of lynx to northeastern Switzer-land) is on one side a first implementation of the Swiss Lynx Management Concept 2000 and on the other side a governmental project based on an agreement between the Governments of the cantons Appenzell Innerrhoden, Appenzell Ausserrhoden, St. Gallen, Thurgau, and Zurich and the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape. The main goals of project include: a) to set-up a regional lynx population, b) to develop and to assure the longterm survival of this population and, by that, c) to contribute to the restoration of the lynx population in the entire Alpine arc. 41 Translocation of lynx to northeastern Switzerland: the project LUNO – its history and structures K. ROBIN1, Ch. RUHLÉ2 , and H. NIGG3 1Robin Habitat AG, Rickenstrasse 2, CH-8730 Uznach; [email protected] 2Head of the wildlife agency of the Canton St. Gallen, Davidstrasse 35, CH-9001 St. Gallen; CHRIS- [email protected] 3 WILDARK Ostschweiz, Untere Gasse 9, CH-9470 Buchs; [email protected] LUNO (Luchsumsiedlung Nordostschweiz = Translocation of lynx to northeastern Switzer- land) is on one side a first implementation of the Swiss Lynx Management Concept 2000 (Blankenhorn 2002, Roch 2000) and on the other side a governmental project based on an agreement between the Governments of the cantons Appenzell Innerrhoden, Appenzell Ausserrhoden, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Notfallringe Und Notfalltierärzte
    Departement für Kleintiere Universität Zürich Departement für Kleintiere Winterthurerstrasse 260 CH-8057 Zürich Telefon +41 44 635 81 11 Telefax +41 44 635 89 40 www.vet.uzh.ch Notfallringe und Notfalltierärzte (Stand 26.01.2017) Es hat sich in den letzten Wochen herausgestellt, dass einige Notfallringe nur oder bevorzugt Patienten aufnehmen, die von den Tierärzten, die dem Ring angeschlossen sind behandelt werden. Daher bitte wie bisher Adressen herausgeben und gleichzeitig sagen, dass auch der Privattierarzt angerufen wird. Dort gibt es in der Regel eine Bandansage, die auf einen Notfallring oder auf einen Notfalltierarzt verweist. Aargau Region Aarau Tierklinik Aarau West, Muhenstrasse 56, 5036 Oberentfelden 24h 365 Tage / Telefon 062 737 80 07 BolligerTschuor AG, Fachtierärzte für Kleintiere, Kieferstrasse 2, 4665 Oftringen – Zofingen 24h 365 Tage / Telefon 062 789 70 70 Tierklinik24, Schmittenweg 5, 5053 Staffelbach 24h 365 Tage / Telefon 062 739 24 24 Region Baden Der Notfall-Tierarzt wechselt in der Region Baden zyklisch. Haustierarzt anrufen und man erfährt via Telefonbeantworter, wer der diensthabende Notfall-Tierarzt ist. Der Notfall- Tierarzt ist auch auf folgender Homepage ersichtlich: https://kleintierpraxis.ch/kontakt/#notfaelle Appenzell Innerrhoden Dr. med. vet. FVH T. Fritsche, Hofwiesweg 3, 9050 Appenzell 24h 365 Tage / Telefon 071 787 18 19 Basel-Land Kleintierklinik Klaus AG, Benzburweg 9, 4410 Liestal 24h 365 Tage / Telefon 061 921 66 66 Seite 1/8 Departement für Kleintiere Region Bern und Umgebung Der Tierarzt-Notruf wird von den Tierärzten der Stadt Bern und Agglomeration organisiert. 24h 365 Tage / Telefon 0900 00 25 25 (CHF 3.13/Min.) Tierambulanz Telefon 0900 388 388 (kostenpflichtige Nummer) Kleintierklinik Tierspital Bern Telefon 0900 90 09 60 (CHF 1.50/Min.) Freiburg Telefon 0900 503 503 (kostenpflichtige Nummer) Nur für Region Freiburg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Ponthaux, Granges-Paccot, Marly und Avry-sur-Matran Glarus Kleintierpraxis Buchholz, Buchholzstr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Swiss Parliament: a Hybrid System Based on the Idea of Changing Majorities
    The Swiss Parliament: A hybrid system based on the idea of changing majorities By Andreas Ladner © Parlamentsdienste 3003 Bern The Swiss Parliament – or better the Federal Assembly – was installed in 1848 when the former confederation of 25 independent cantons became a federal nation state. The form and organization of the Parliament was one of the main points of discussion while drafting the Constitution. Those in favour of a strong nation state - the liberal and predominantly protestant cantons which won the short civil war (“Sonderbund War”) - wanted a National Assembly with a composition reflecting the prevailing population proportions of the cantons. This would have put the smaller predominantly conservative and catholic cantons at a considerable disadvantage. They wanted a revised form of the Federal Diet (the legislative and executive council of the Swiss confederacy prior to 1848) representing the cantons equally. This, however, would have prevented the Liberals who were in the majority and located in the larger cantons of the Central Lowlands from building a more centralized and unified nation state. After laborious discussions a compromise was reached in the form of a two-chamber system following the model of the United States of America: a smaller chamber representing the cantons and a bigger chamber representing the citizens. The two Chambers were given equal power. In a comparative perspective Swiss bicameralism is therefore similar to countries like the United States, Canada, Australia and Germany since the two chambers are of equal importance (symmetric) and they are elected differently (incongruent). The Council of States (The Chamber of the Cantons, the upper house) consists of 46 seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimbursement of Excessive Premiums
    Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Public Health FOPH Health and Accident Insurance Division Federal Office of Public Health, Insurance Supervision Division, August 2018 Reimbursement of excessive premiums Article 17 of the Federal Act on the Oversight of Social Health Insurance (Health Insurance Oversight Act HIOA; SR 832.12) governs the reimbursement of excessive income from insurance premiums. In- surers can apply to the FOPH for permission to reimburse income from a particular canton if this signif- icantly exceeds the accumulated annual costs in that canton. During the 2017 financial year, three insurers applied to the FOPH for permission to reimburse excessive income from premiums in the cantons listed below: Genossenschaft Glarner Krankenversicherung in the canton of Glarus (GL) Kranken- und Unfallkasse Einsiedeln in the canton of Schwyz (SZ) Vivao Sympany AG in the cantons of Aargau (AG), Bern (BE), Basel-Landschaft (BL), Basel- Stadt (BS), Fribourg (FR), Lucerne (LU) and Solothurn (SO) In its ruling of 8 August 2018, the FOPH approved Genossenschaft Glarner Krankenversicherung’s ap- plication as follows: Canton of Glarus: Reimbursement of CHF 80.03 per insured person Everyone insured by Genossenschaft Glarner Krankenversicherung in the above-mentioned canton on 31 December 2017 will be reimbursed the relevant amount before the end of 2018. In its ruling of 8 August 2018, the FOPH approved Kranken- und Unfallkasse Einsiedeln’s application as follows: Canton of Schwyz: Reimbursement of CHF 130 per insured person Everyone insured by Kranken- und Unfallkasse Einsiedeln in the above-mentioned canton on 31 De- cember 2017 will be reimbursed the relevant amount before the end of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Democracy in Switzerland
    33 SESSION Report CG33(2017)14final 20 October 2017 Local and regional democracy in Switzerland Monitoring Committee Rapporteurs:1 Marc COOLS, Belgium (L, ILDG) Dorin CHIRTOACA, Republic of Moldova (R, EPP/CCE) Recommendation 407 (2017) .................................................................................................................2 Explanatory memorandum .....................................................................................................................5 Summary This particularly positive report is based on the second monitoring visit to Switzerland since the country ratified the European Charter of Local Self-Government in 2005. It shows that municipal self- government is particularly deeply rooted in Switzerland. All municipalities possess a wide range of powers and responsibilities and substantial rights of self-government. The financial situation of Swiss municipalities appears generally healthy, with a relatively low debt ratio. Direct-democracy procedures are highly developed at all levels of governance. Furthermore, the rapporteurs very much welcome the Swiss parliament’s decision to authorise the ratification of the Additional Protocol to the European Charter of Local Self-Government on the right to participate in the affairs of a local authority. The report draws attention to the need for improved direct involvement of municipalities, especially the large cities, in decision-making procedures and with regard to the question of the sustainability of resources in connection with the needs of municipalities to enable them to discharge their growing responsibilities. Finally, it highlights the importance of determining, through legislation, a framework and arrangements regarding financing for the city of Bern, taking due account of its specific situation. The Congress encourages the authorities to guarantee that the administrative bodies belonging to intermunicipal structures are made up of a minimum percentage of directly elected representatives so as to safeguard their democratic nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Design of Referendums an International Idea Working Paper *
    N. º 4, Segundo Semestre 2007 ISSN: 1659-2069 THE USE AND DESIGN OF REFERENDUMS AN INTERNATIONAL IDEA WORKING PAPER * Andrew Ellis ** [email protected] Nota del Consejo Editorial Abstract: Introduces an International IDEA working paper on referendum and direct democracy as result of an investigation carried out in Europe and Latin America. It analyzes matters such as the use of direct democracy and its impact in representative democracy, as well as the adoption of the referendum mechanism, referenda types, matters of situations where a referendum can take place, participation thresholds, financial controls, the writing of the question to be consulted, etc.. Key words: Direct democracy / Referendum / Popular consultation / Plebiscite / Latin America / Democracy. Resumen: Presenta un ensayo práctico de IDEA Internacional sobre el referéndum y la democracia directa producto de un trabajo investigativo realizado en Europa y América Latina. Analiza temas como el uso de institutos de democracia directa y su impacto en la democracia representativa, la adopción del mecanismo del referéndum, los tipos de referéndum, los temas o situaciones en que un referéndum puede ser celebrado, los umbrales de participación, los controles financieros, la redacción de la pregunta a consultar, etc. Palabras claves: Democracia directa / Referéndum / Consulta popular / América Latina / Democracia. * Dissertation presented at "Seminary of reflection on the importance and use of mechanisms of direct democracy in democratic systems", celebrated on May 25th, 2007, at San José, Costa Rica and organized by International IDEA and the Electoral Supreme Tribunal of the Republic of Costa Rica. This Working Paper is part of a process of debate and does not necessarily represent a policy position of International IDEA.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Geographic and Cultural Determinants of Bankruptcy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Buehler, Stefan; Kaiser, Christian; Jaeger, Franz Working Paper On the geographic and cultural determinants of bankruptcy Working Paper, No. 0701 Provided in Cooperation with: Socioeconomic Institute (SOI), University of Zurich Suggested Citation: Buehler, Stefan; Kaiser, Christian; Jaeger, Franz (2007) : On the geographic and cultural determinants of bankruptcy, Working Paper, No. 0701, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute, Zurich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/76140 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Socioeconomic Institute Sozialökonomisches Institut Working Paper No. 0701 On the Geographic and Cultural Determinants of Bankruptcy Stefan Buehler, Christian Kaiser, and Franz Jaeger June 2007 (revised version) Socioeconomic Institute University of Zurich Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Individual States in Fostering Migration - a Swiss and American Case Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eScholarship@BC Emigrants, Immigrants and the State: The role of Individual States in Fostering Migration - A Swiss and American Case Study Author: Melanie Simone Lorenz Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108834 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2019 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Emigrants, Immigrants and the State: The role of Individual States in Fostering Migration - A Swiss and American Case Study Melanie Simone Lorenz A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Boston College Morrissey College of Arts and Sciences Graduate School April 2019 © Copyright 2019 Melanie Simone Lorenz Emigrants, Immigrants and the State: The Role of Individual States in Fostering Migration - A Swiss and American Case Study Melanie Simone Lorenz Advisors: Dr. Heather Cox Richardson, PhD Dr. Marilynn Johnson, PhD Emigrants, Immigrants and the State: The Role of Individual States in Fostering Migration – A Swiss and American Case Study analyzes the role that individual American states (in opposition to the nation state) played in fostering migration during the long nineteenth century. The paper argues that individual states played a crucial role in fostering migration because of different economic challenges and that in order to create a more complex, and more inclusive narrative of American immigration history, scholars must pay closer attention to the individual states in Europe and the United States.
    [Show full text]