DOCSLIB.ORG

In Blue Are the Updates Since the Last 1 June 2007 Summary)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Blue Are the Updates Since the Last 1 June 2007 Summary) Muniwireless.com 1 August 2007 list of US cities and regions (in blue are the updates since the last 1 June 2007 summary) Region and citywide networks Tempe AZ MobilePro Chandler AZ MobilePro Pleasanton CA Network Anatomy Concord CA MetroFi, phase 1 rolled out Marina del Rey CA Planet Halo Foster City CA MetroFi Pacifica CA Veraloft Galt CA Softcom Anaheim CA EarthLink Mountain View CA Google Cerritos CA Cupertino CA MetroFi Sunnyvale CA MetroFi Santa Clara CA MetroFi Lompoc CA Hermosa Beach CA free Internet access San Diego Indian tribal villages CA West Hollywood CA Riverside CA AT&T, MetroFi - only a downtown hotzone for now Vail CO CenturyTel Longmont CO MobilePro St. Cloud FL Deployed and managed by Hewlett Packard Monticello FL Winter Park FL outdoor only Kissimmee FL Motorola, Scientel Adel GA Rome GA GTS Linton IN Scottsburg IN Brownsburg IN Moving Target Marion IN Western Kansas KS Lexington KY Owensboro KY Vivian LA Princeton MA Cape Cod MA Brookline MA Galaxy, Strix, multi-use network including public safety Rockland ME Redzone Wireless Thomaston ME Redzone Wireless Annapolis MD Annapolis Wireless Allegany County MD Coldwater MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Bronson MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Quincy MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Tekonsha MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Grand Haven MI Azulstar Ferrysburg MI Spring Lake MI Gladstone MI Washtenaw County MI 20/20 Communications Buffalo MN Chaska MN Moorhead MN Nevada MO Southaven MS Los Lunas NM Rio Rancho NM Azulstar Fire Island NY Dublin OH Tulsa OK Portland OR MetroFi, Microsoft Lebanon OR Sandy OR Umatilla County OR Philadelphia PA EarthLink Kutztown PA Dublin PA South Pittsburg TN Trinity Communications, free WiFi access Linden TX Addison TX Red Moon Granbury TX Southlake TX Corpus Christi TX Northrop Grumman, EarthLink (AMR project) Radford VA Radnet Dickenson County VA Braxton County VA West Virginia Broadband (nonprofit) Island Pond VT Brandon VT Marshfield-Plainfield VT Grand Isle VT Westmore VT Stevenson WA Federal Way WA Page 1 of 8 Muniwireless.com 1 August 2007 list of US cities and regions (in blue are the updates since the last 1 June 2007 summary) Benton County WA Renton WA Pasco WA Southeast Washington state WA Sun Prairie WI Waupaca WI Jackson WI Madison WI phase 1 live TOTAL 92 Page 2 of 8 Muniwireless.com 1 August 2007 list of US cities and regions (in blue are the updates since the last 1 June 2007 summary) City hotzones Scottsdale AZ Wildfire Wireless Broadband Surprise AZ Wildfire Wireless Broadband Fresno* CA San Joaquin CA Sanger CA Parlier CA Livermore CA Milpitas* CA EarthLink Newport Harbor CA Laguna Broadcasting Laguna Beach CA Laguna Broadcasting Covina CA Fullerton CA Culver City CA Los Angeles CA Encinitas CA Santa Barbara CA Burbank CA Pomona CA will expand Denver CO Kiva Networks Fort Collins CO Nortel, Front Range Washington DC Wilmington DE Daytona Beach FL Panama City FL Sarasota FL Sanford FL Honolulu (Chinatown) HI Highland Park IL Urbana IL Indianapolis IN Lexington KY Louisville KY Frankfort KY Marshalltown IA New Orleans LA EarthLink Nantucket MA Worcester MA Baltimore MD Michigan City MI Sheridan MT Southern Pines NC Aberdeen NC Greenville NC Wilmington NC Nashua NH Elizabeth NJ city-owned Rochester NY Glen Cove NY Utica NY Dayton OH Cleveland OH Sapulpa OK Forest Grove OR Cisco Pittsburgh PA US Wireless Bethlehem PA Charleston SC will expand Spartanburg SC San Antonio TX Richardson TX Spotsylvania VA Alexandria VA Vienna VA Tropos, WiFi Wizards Bellevue WA Harborlink, Cisco Spokane WA Vancouver WA Kent WA Cedarburg WI Time Warner Cable Cody WY TOTAL 68 *Milpitas and Fresno have separate citywide public safety networks, see next page Page 3 of 8 Muniwireless.com 1 August 2007 list of US cities and regions (in blue are the updates since the last 1 June 2007 summary) Public safety and municipal use only networks Rio Rico AZ San Diego County CA San Mateo CA Milpitas CA Ripon CA Fresno CA Pleasant Hill CA Aurora CO Salida CO North Miami Beach FL Sarasota County FL Riviera Beach FL Cocoa Beach FL Sarasota County FL Smyrna Beach FL Macon GA Thomson GA McDuffie County GA Savannah GA Kansas City KS Lenexa KS New Orleans LA Washington LA Buffalo MN Lewis & Clark County MO Wake County NC Lincoln NE Las Vegas NM Las Vegas NV Jamestown NV Oklahoma City OK Beaverton OR Medford OR York County PA Providence RI Garland TX Colleyville TX Bellevue WA Seattle (port) WA Marquette WI Montpelier VT TOTAL 40 Page 4 of 8 Muniwireless.com 1 August 2007 list of US cities and regions (in blue are the updates since the last 1 June 2007 summary) City and countywide projects (received grants or RFP/RFI issued or deployment phase) Anchorage AK looking for another vendor (was MetroFi) Yuma (deploying) AZ Neoreach/MobilePro Sahuarita (deploying) AZ HP Mesa (RFP issued) AZ EarthLink, MobilePro are finalists Phoenix (deploying) AZ Flagstaff AZ RFP issued Gilbert (deploying) AZ MobilePro Marin County CA RFI issued Elk Grove CA Los Angeles CA RFP for consultant issued Napa CA AT&T Maywood (deploying) CA Netlogix Clovis CA negotiating with MetroFi Chico (deploying) CA Digital Path Oakland CA RFP for consultant issued Corona CA looking for another vendor (was MetroFi) West Covina (RFP issued) CA Long Beach (RFP issued) CA Pasadena (deploying) CA EarthLink Foster City (deploying) CA MetroFi Ontario (deploying) CA MetroFi San Francisco (negotiations) CA EarthLink Sacramento CA MetroConnect (Cisco, Intel, Seakay, Azulstar) San Jose (RFP issued) CA Santa Monica CA in final testing with Azulstar Irvine CA Nextphase Wireless setting up public safety 4.9 GHz network Santa Rosa CA Sonic.net deploying Petaluma CA Sonic.net deploying Santa Clarita CA Fremont (deploying) CA MetroFi Silicon Valley (negotiating) CA 42 cities Arvada CO ten CO cities issued Boulder CO joint RFP Broomfield CO responses due 13 April Lakewood CO Louisville CO Superior CO Northglenn CO Thornton CO Wheat Rdige CO Golden CO Denver (choosing vendor) CO public safety onlySeakay/Azulstar/IBM/Cisco Windsor CO Nortel, Front Range Loveland CO Nortel, Front Range Hartford (pilot phase) CT Manchester (RFP issued) CT Delray Beach FL deploying Dunedin (deploying) FL Citi Wifi Networks Miami Beach (deploying) FL IBM St. Petersburg FL EarthLink Treasure Island (deploying) FL Citi Wifi Networks Orlando (deploying) FL Smart City Tampa FL setting up downtown hotzone Gwinett County (RFP issued) GA RFP issued Alpharetta (RFQ issued) GA municipal use only Atlanta (RFP issued) GA Decatur (RFP issued) GA grant received Augusta GA grant received Dublin GA grant received Gwinett County GA grant received Milledgeville-Baldwin County GA RFP issued Thomasville GA grant received Lincoln County GA Columbia County GA Warren County GA Wilkes County GA West Des Moines (RFP issued) IA Pocatello ID deploying public safety network Meridian (RFP issued) ID Crystal Lake IL in deployment; Heartland Communications Naperville IL in deployment; MetroFi Montgomery County (RFP issued) IL RFP issued Macoupin County (RFP issued) IL RFP issued Chicago (RFP issued) IL Cook County (deploying) IL public safety only Rockford (deploying) IL Aurora (deploying) IL MetroFi Springfield (deploying) IL AT&T Rochelle (deploying) IL Rochelle Municipal Utilities South Bend (deploying) IN Beech Grove (deploying) IN Federal Signal Johnson County (RFP issued) KS North Newton KS negotiating with vendor Wichita KS selecting vendor Page 5 of 8 Muniwireless.com 1 August 2007 list of US cities and regions (in blue are the updates since the last 1 June 2007 summary) Lafayette LA adding wireless to fiber network New Orleans (expanding) LA EarthLink Newton MA in deployment; Galaxy Internet Boston (RFI) MA Pepperell (preliminary plans) MA Malden (deploying) MA Orleans (deploying) MA Cambridge (deploying) MA hotzone / MIT Rockville MD AEPC and Ricochet deploying Cabin John (RFI issued) MD Towson MD deploying hotzone Muskegon MI Marquette MI Genesee County (RFP issued) MI Ottawa County (RFP issued) MI Oakland County (deploying) MI MichTel Communications Grand Rapids (deploying) MI Clearwire Traverse City (choosing vendor) MI Macomb County (deploying) MI Mica Networks Austin MN Burnsville (deploying) MN Frontier Osseo (deploying) MN Unplugged Cities, RoamAD Minneapolis (deploying) MN US Internet St. Louis Park (deploying) MN Unplugged Cities St. Louis MO AT&T Armory MS Winston-Salem County (deploying) NC IBM, Cisco Rock Hill (deploying) NC CSG Data, Tropos Charlotte (RFP issued) NC Columbus (negotiating) NE Frontier Carroll county NH led by nonprofit NCIC Coos county NH led by nonprofit NCIC Grafton county NH led by nonprofit NCIC Summit (RFP issued) NJ Somerville NJ RFP for hotzone Ocean City NJ RFP issued, beach tagging, child safety apps Albuquerque NM issued RFP Red River (deploying) NM Sandoval County (deploying) NM Dandin Group Henderson NV Sprint Las Vegas NV Extenet Systems, Cheetah Wireless deploying Albany (deploying) NY Tech Valley, Cisco Suffolk County (choosing vendor) NY Suffolk-Nassau is a joint bid; Nassau County (choosing vendor) NY they receive 14 responses Buffalo NY issued RFPs for citywide Wi-Fi and wireless cameras New York City (deploying) NY Northrop-Grumman, public safety only Ulster (deploying) NY Cleveland OH issued RFP Akron (deploying) OH Cuyahoga Falls (deploying) OH Dayton (negotiating) OH HarborLink Toledo (choosing vendor) OH Gahanna OH RFP issued New Albany OH RFP issued Springfield (deploying) OH HarborLink Oklahoma City (RFP issued) OK public safety
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scanless Fast Handoff Technique Based on Global Path-Cache for Wlans
    Scanless fast handoff technique based on global Path-Cache for WLANs Wanalertlak, W., Lee, B., Yu, C., Kim, M., Park, S. M., & Kim, W. T. (2013). Scanless fast handoff technique based on global Path-Cache for WLANs. Journal of Supercomputing, 66(3), 1320-1349. doi:10.1007/s11227-012-0805-7 10.1007/s11227-012-0805-7 Springer Accepted Manuscript http://hdl.handle.net/1957/48745 http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Journal of Supercomputing manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Scanless Fast Handoff Technique Based on Global Path Cache for WLANs Weetit Wanalertlak · Ben Lee · Chansu Yu · Myungchul Kim · Seung-Min Park · Won-Tae Kim Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract Wireless LANs (WLANs) have been widely adopted and are more convenient as they are inter-connected as wireless campus networks and wire- less mesh networks. However, time-sensitive multimedia applications, which have become more popular, could suffer from long end-to-end latency in WLANs. This is due mainly to handoff delay, which in turn is caused by channel scan- ning. This paper proposes a technique called Global Path-Cache (GPC) that provides fast handoffs in WLANs. GPC properly captures the dynamic be- havior of the network and MSs, and provides accurate next-AP predictions to minimize the handoff latency. Moreover, the handoff frequencies are treated Weetit Wanalertlak and Ben Lee School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA Tel.: 1-541-737-3148 E-mail: {wanalewe,benl}@eecs.orst.edu Chansu
    [Show full text]
  • The Philadelphia Story Learning from a Municipal Wireless Pioneer
    The Philadelphia Story Learning from a Municipal Wireless Pioneer Joshua Breitbart, Author Naveen Lakshmipathy, Appendices Sascha D. Meinrath, Editor NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION 1 The Philadelphia Story Learning from a Municipal Wireless Pioneer Joshua Breitbart, Author Naveen Lakshmipathy, Appendices Sascha D. Meinrath, Editor Washington, DC Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................3 Keys To Successful Municipal Wireless Network Deployment......................................................................4 Welcome To Philadelphia ............................................................................................................................................7 About This Report ..........................................................................................................................................................8 Philadelphia A Case Study..........................................................................................................9 Pilot Project.......................................................................................................................................................................9 The Executive Committee .........................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Privacy Analysis of the Six Proposals for San Francisco
    A Privacy Analysis of the Six Proposals for San Francisco Municipal Broadband Six companies have proposed plans to bring municipal broadband to San Francisco. They range from approaches where users will pay monthly fees, to advertising-supported services and free services. Whatever the City's approach, we think it is important that the accepted proposal respect Californian's fundamental right to privacy. San Franciscans have the right to a network that respects privacy and autonomy, one that allows users to explore what the Internet has to offer, including information about medical conditions and the use of online banking, without fear of government or commercial surveillance and intrusion. In the summary below, we compare the six proposals against a model standard of privacy rights. This comparison only judges the proposals on privacy rights; other important interests, such as bridging the digital divide, reliability in service, and quality of service, are not considered. Again, we applaud City officials for their efforts to bring municipal broadband to San Francisco. This effort is an important experiment in public policy, one that we fully support. Our efforts are intended not to slow down or frustrate this important process, but rather to ensure that the network respects privacy rights. Background On October 19, 2005, the ACLU of Northern California, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) submitted comments to TechConnect concerning the privacy implications of municipal broadband access. In that letter, the groups raised a series of privacy issues that sought to focus attention on whether uses of the municipal broadband network will have secure and private access to the Internet (see Appendix A).
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Broadband: Challenges and Perspectives
    Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 59 Issue 1 Article 4 12-2006 Municipal Broadband: Challenges and Perspectives Craig Dingwall Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Communications Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Dingwall, Craig (2006) "Municipal Broadband: Challenges and Perspectives," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 59 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol59/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Municipal Broadband: Challenges and Perspectives Craig Dingwall* I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ................................................ 68 II. BROADBAND DEMAND ............................................................. 69 III. POSSIBLE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL BROADBAND ............. 76 IV. SPEED, FEATURE, AND PRICE CONSIDERATIONS ....................... 77 V. MUNICIPAL BROADBAND STATUS ............................................. 81 A. MunicipalBroadband Deployment ..................................... 81 B. State and FederalLegislation ................................................. 85 C. Nixon v.
    [Show full text]
  • ANCHORAGE to GO “FREE WIRELESS” THIS SUMMER National Firm Awarded Contract for Wireless Services in Downtown First
    press_release_20070618 Home | Departments | Mayor | Assembly | Employee Directory | Contact Us | Find You are here : Home > Mayor's Office > press_release_20070618 spacer spacer spacer For Immediate Release Contact: Julie Hasquet June 18, 2007 343-7103 ANCHORAGE TO GO “FREE WIRELESS” THIS SUMMER National Firm Awarded Contract for Wireless Services in Downtown First Downtown Anchorage is scheduled to be “wireless” with free Internet access this summer, under the terms of a license agreement the Municipality plans to award to the leading national wireless broadband service provider, Mayor Mark Begich announced today. The contract with MetroFi, Inc., of Mountain View, Calif., calls for the company to build a wireless broadband network using city facilities such as light poles and buildings. Initially scheduled for the downtown, the network would eventually be expanded to include the rest of Anchorage. The contract is subject to approval by the Anchorage Assembly. It is scheduled for action on June 26. “Cities across America are starting to experience the cutting edge benefits of wireless technology,” Mayor Begich said. “Anchorage will soon be part of this trend which is improving city services and connecting its citizens with government and businesses.” MetroFi will offer free wireless services to Anchorage residents, visitors and businesses working, visiting or living in the downtown core. Additional services, at competitive pricing, will also be available to residents, businesses and Anchorage’s municipal government. The selection of MetroFi was conducted through a Request for Proposal competitive process. Six firms, both in-state and out-of-state, submitted proposals. MetroFi was selected as the best proposal based on experience, its successful deployment of wireless technology in other cities and what it offers Anchorage.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Municipal Wireless Infrastructure
    Developing Municipal Wireless Infrastructure Catherine A. Middleton Ryerson University digital.library.ryerson.ca/object/61 Please Cite: Middleton, C. A. (2009). Developing municipal wireless infrastructure. Public Sector Digest, Summer, 37-41. library.ryerson.ca TECHNOLOGY PARIS , France, is a leader in providing free Wi-Fi access to both residents and visitors. Developing Municipal Wireless Infrastructure BY CATHERINE MIDDLETON In the middle of this decade, there was great interest in the municipal service delivery, and improving citizens’ access to the development of municipal wireless networks. Recognizing that web. Large-scale, high profile projects were planned in cities like internet access was becoming an essential service, Toronto, San Francisco, and Philadelphia. In 2007, the municipalities considered building wireless networks as a means website muniwireless.com estimated that there were more than of fostering economic development, improving efficiency of 400 ‘muni Wi-Fi’ projects planned, under development or www.publicsectordigest.com Summer 2009 Public Sector Digest 3 7 The early hype and excitement has been replaced with a “” much more realistic outlook on what wireless networks can and cannot do for municipalities. actually operational in the United States. By late 2007, however, because the private company could generate revenues by it became evident that the espoused benefits of municipal providing internet access to local residences. wireless networks were not as easy to achieve as initially anticipated. Networks were abandoned, scaled back or delayed, It is now clear that, to be viable, this approach requires an as Earthlink, Google, MetroFi and other corporate partners ongoing financial commitment from the municipality as an exited the municipal wireless sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenard Files Comments with FCC On
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20544 In the Matter of ) ) Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services ) WT Docket No. 07-195 In the 2155-2175 MHz Band ) COMMENTS OF THOMAS M. LENARD, PH.D. PRESIDENT AND SENIOR FELLOW THE TECHNOLOGY POLICY INSTITUTE I. INTRODUCTION I am submitting these comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz band (AWS-3).1 The Commission is proposing to auction the AWS-3 spectrum (which includes a 5 MHz guard band) subject to rules that would require the winner to offer a basic tier of free wireless broadband service that virtually the entire U.S. population could access.2 The rules also require the service to filter out “indecent” material. The service conditions are similar to those in an application submitted by M2Z in May, 2006 to obtain this spectrum for free. Under the current proposal, the winner of the spectrum 1 These comments represent the views of the author and not necessarily the views of the Technology Policy Institute, its board or its staff. 2 http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.pdf must provide a basic free 768 kilobits per second service that would reach 50 percent of the population in four years and 95 percent of the population in ten years.3 These comments make the following points: The proposal to allocate the AWS-3 spectrum for a specific use represents a step backward from a market-based approach in favor of the command-and- control approach that had been largely abandoned due to its inherent inefficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Citywide Municipal Wifi Be a Feasible Solution for Local
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by D-Scholarship@Pitt CAN CITYWIDE MUNICIPAL WIFI BE A FEASIBLE SOLUTION FOR LOCAL BROADBAND ACCESS IN THE US? AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF A TECHNO-ECONOMIC MODEL Ph.D. Dissertation by Kuang Chiu Huang B.A. in Transportation and Communication Management Science, National Cheng Kung University, 1991 M.A. in Telecommunications, Michigan State University, 2003 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Department of Information Science and Telecommunications in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2008 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS This dissertation was presented by Kuang Chiu Huang It was approved by Martin B. H. Weiss, Ph.D., Associate Professor, DIST Richard A. Thompson, Ph.D., Professor, DIST Prashant Krishnamurthy, Ph.D., Associate Professor, DIST Christinger Tomer, Ph.D., Associate Professor, DLIS Johannes M. Bauer, Ph.D., Professor DTISM, Michigan State University Dissertation Director: Martin B. H. Weiss, Ph.D., Associate Professor, DIST ii Copyright © by Kuang Chiu Huang 2008 iii CAN CITYWIDE MUNICIPAL WIFI BE A FEASIBLE SOLUTION FOR LOCAL BROADBAND ACCESS IN THE US? AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF A TECHNO-ECONOMIC MODEL Kuang Chiu Huang University of Pittsburgh 2008 Citywide wireless fidelity (WiFi) offers an opportunity for municipalities and BISPs to break through the duopoly broadband market structure that is prevalent in the US. Although municipal WiFi offers low deployment cost, short building time, high capacity, and wide coverage, the competition from the local broadband market makes it difficult to be self–sustainable from public Internet access revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Mar-28-2009 List of Cities
    Muniwireless.com 28 March 2009 list of US cities and regions Region and citywide networks Tempe AZ looking for new provider Chandler AZ looking for new provider Pleasanton CA Network Anatomy Concord CA MetroFi Marina del Rey CA Planet Halo Fremont CA MetroFi Foster City CA MetroFi Pacifica CA Veraloft Galt CA Softcom Anaheim CA EarthLink Mountain View CA Google Milpitas CA Silicon Valley Unwired Pleasant Hill CA Air Cloud Communications Cerritos CA Cupertino CA MetroFi Sunnyvale CA MetroFi Lompoc CA Hermosa Beach CA free Internet access San Diego Indian tribal villages CA West Hollywood CA Riverside CA AT&T Vail CO CenturyTel Longmont CO DHB Networks St. Cloud FL Deployed and managed by Hewlett Packard Monticello FL Winter Park FL outdoor only Kissimmee FL Motorola, Scientel Hollywood FL wireless AMR, public safety, free WiFi in parks Adel GA Rome GA GTS Thomasville GA Rose.Net (owned by Thomasville Utilities) Naperville IL MetroFi Granite City IL Network 1 Linton IN Beech Grove IN Unplugged Cities Scottsburg IN Brownsburg IN Moving Target Marion IN Western Kansas KS Lexington KY Owensboro KY Vivian LA Princeton MA Cape Cod MA Brookline MA Galaxy, Strix, multi-use network including public safety Rockland ME Redzone Wireless Thomaston ME Redzone Wireless Annapolis MD Annapolis Wireless Allegany County MD CONXX Cumberland MD CONXX Coldwater MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Bronson MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Quincy MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Tekonsha MI operated by Coldwater Board of Public Utilities Grand Haven MI Ferrysburg MI Springfield MI Spring Lake MI Gladstone MI Washtenaw County MI 20/20 Communications Austin MN Austin Utilities Minneapolis MN US Internet Buffalo MN Chaska MN Moorhead MN Florissant MO Network 1 Crestwood MO Network 1 Kirkwood MO Network 1 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband for All? Gaps in California’S Broadband Adoption and Availability
    Public Policy Institute of California CEP California Economic Policy Ellen Hanak, editor Volume 3, Number 2 n July 2007 Broadband for All? Gaps in California’s Broadband Adoption and Availability By Jed Kolko SUMMARY early half of California households have broadband (high- speed) Internet access. Broadband is more widely available Nin higher-income and higher-density areas, and there are large gaps in access between the urbanized coastal regions of California and the more rural inland areas. Differences in broadband adoption rates between different racial and ethnic groups are also significant, although some of these are due to different rates of computer ownership. The technical features of broadband, including the scale economies in providing broadband infrastructure, make some regions of California more profitable to serve than others, leading to gaps in availability. Even where broadband is available, the cost of service, as well as the cost of computer hardware, results in higher rates of adoption for some than others. However, these gaps are hard to measure. This issue of California Economic Policy assesses the extent of inequalities in broadband adoption and availability in California, using an innovative method to measure its availability. All levels of government—federal, state, and local—have policies to make broadband more widely available: Policymakers hope to raise the overall level of adoption and to close the gaps between those who have access and those who do not. This report reviews the policy approaches that California and its cities are taking to raise broadband adoption and availability, includ- ing local efforts to provide municipal Wi-Fi (wireless broadband).
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Municipal Wireless Infrastructure by CATHERINE MIDDLETON
    TECHNOLOGY PARIS , France, is a leader in providing free Wi-Fi access to both residents and visitors. Developing Municipal Wireless Infrastructure BY CATHERINE MIDDLETON In the middle of this decade, there was great interest in the municipal service delivery, and improving citizens’ access to the development of municipal wireless networks. Recognizing that web. Large-scale, high profile projects were planned in cities like internet access was becoming an essential service, Toronto, San Francisco, and Philadelphia. In 2007, the municipalities considered building wireless networks as a means website muniwireless.com estimated that there were more than of fostering economic development, improving efficiency of 400 ‘muni Wi-Fi’ projects planned, under development or www.publicsectordigest.com Summer 2009 Public Sector Digest 3 7 The early hype and excitement has been replaced with a “” much more realistic outlook on what wireless networks can and cannot do for municipalities. actually operational in the United States. By late 2007, however, because the private company could generate revenues by it became evident that the espoused benefits of municipal providing internet access to local residences. wireless networks were not as easy to achieve as initially anticipated. Networks were abandoned, scaled back or delayed, It is now clear that, to be viable, this approach requires an as Earthlink, Google, MetroFi and other corporate partners ongoing financial commitment from the municipality as an exited the municipal wireless sector. Toronto’s network, anchor tenant, but the municipality does not receive any share of OneZone, was not a municipal wireless project, but its network revenues. Some networks are developed in partnership developer, Toronto Hydro Telecom, initially proposed covering with private sector companies, with costs and revenues shared a 630 km 2 area to blanket Toronto with wireless internet access.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Municipal Wireless
    Beyond Municipal Wireless BY STEVEN TITCH he harsh daylight of fiscal reality has rudely closed that it was considering a bankruptcy filing.This awakened city administrators across the coun- followed the company’s 2007 decision to limit partner- Ttry to the unfeasibility of funding or partnering ships to cities that agreed to purchase a significant level in citywide consumer wireless-broadband services. of wireless services themselves, thus providing the oper- Over the past year, city after city has retreated from ation with immediate cash flow. Azulstar, which had large-scale municipal wireless projects. Most, including won the contract to construct a multicity municipal Houston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Anchorage,Alaska, wireless system covering much of Silicon Valley, was backed away before committing any forced to exit the deal after failing to substantial funds or city assets. raise the necessary capital. That fol- The final nail in the municipal The case for lowed Rio Rancho, New Mexico’s wireless coffin may have been Earth- municipal wireless decision to pull the plug on an Azul- Link, Inc.’s May 13 announcement that star system there after the company it will be shutting down its system in was founded on the failed to pay $33,000 in electric bills Philadelphia. The City of Brotherly premise that owed to the city. Love was the first major U.S. city to In policy circles municipal wire- wade into the municipal wireless broadband service less, a subset of the larger municipal- waters, announcing its deal with Earth- was equivalent to broadband concept, intensified the Link in 2005.
    [Show full text]