The Plight of the Hemlock in Eastern Forests
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Survey of the Taxonomic and Tissue Distribution of Microsomal Binding
Survey of the Taxonomic and Tissue Distribution of Microsomal Binding Sites for the Non-Host Selective Fungal Phytotoxin, Fusicoccin Christiane Meyer3, Kerstin Waldkötter3, Annegret Sprenger3, Uwe G. Schlösset, Markus Luther0, and Elmar W. Weiler3 a Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenphysiologie, Ruhr-Universität, D-44780 Bochum, Bundesrepublik Deutschland b Pflanzenphysiologisches Institut (SAG) der Universität, D-37073 Göttingen, Bundesrepublik Deutschland c KFA Jülich, D-52428 Jülich, Bundesrepublik Deutschland Z. Naturforsch. 48c, 595-602(1993); received June 4/July 13, 1993 Vicia faba L., Fusicoccin-Binding Sites. Taxonomie Distribution, Tissue Distribution, Guard Cell Protoplasts The recent identification of the fusicoccin-binding protein (FCBP) in plasma membranes from monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous angiosperms has opened the basis for an elucida tion of the toxin’s mechanism(s) of action and indicated a widespread occurrence of the FCBP in plants. Results of a detailed taxonomic survey of fusicoccin-binding sites are reported. Bind ing sites were not found in prokaryotes, animal tissues, fungi and algae including the most direct extant ancestors of the land plants (Coleochaete). From the Psilotales (Psilophytatae) to the monocotyledonous angiosperms, all taxa analyzed possessed high-affinity microsomal fusicoccin-binding sites. A heterogeneous picture emerged for the Bryophvta. Anthoceros cri- spulus (Anthocerotae), the only hornwort available to study, lacked fusicoccin binding. Within the Hepaticae as well as the Musci, species lacking and species exhibiting toxin binding were found. The binding site thus seems to have emerged very early in the evolution of the land plants. The tissue distribution of fusicoccin-binding sites was studied in Vicia faba L. shoots. All tissues analyzed showed fusicoccin binding, although not to the same extent. -
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. -
Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing -
The Distribution and Habitat Selection of Introduced Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus Carolinensis, in British Columbia
03_03045_Squirrels.qxd 11/7/06 4:25 PM Page 343 The Distribution and Habitat Selection of Introduced Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis, in British Columbia EMILY K. GONZALES Centre for Applied Conservation Research, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, 3004-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada Gonzales, Emily K. 2005. The distribution and habitat selection of introduced Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis,in British Columbia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 119(3): 343-350. Eastern Grey Squirrels were first introduced to Vancouver in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia in 1909. A separate introduction to Metchosin in the Victoria region occurred in 1966. I surveyed the distribution and habitat selection of East- ern Grey Squirrels in both locales. Eastern Grey Squirrels spread throughout both regions over a period of 30 years and were found predominantly in residential land types. Some natural features and habitats, such as mountains, large bodies of water, and coniferous forests, have acted as barriers to expansion for Eastern Grey Squirrels. Given that urbanization is replacing conifer forests throughout southern British Columbia, it is predicted that Eastern Grey Squirrels will continue to spread as habitat barriers are removed. Key Words: Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis, distribution, habitat selection, invasive, British Columbia. The vast majority of introduced species do not suc- such as backyards, parks, and cemeteries (Pasitschniak- cessfully establish populations in novel environments Arts and Bendell 1990). EGS co-occur with North (Williamson 1996). Many successful non-native species American Red Squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) are human comensals which thrive in human-modified throughout much of their range where habitat special- environments (Williamson and Fitter 1996; Sax and ization and not competition determines the differences Brown 2000). -
Carolina Hemlock Information
http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/dendrology/syllabus/factsheet.cfm?ID=143 USDAFS Additional Silvics Index of Species Information SPECIES: Tsuga caroliniana Introductory Distribution and Occurrence Management Considerations Botanical and Ecological Characteristics Fire Ecology Fire Effects References Introductory SPECIES: Tsuga caroliniana AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Coladonato, Milo 1993. Tsuga caroliniana. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2009, November 2]. ABBREVIATION : TSUCAR SYNONYMS : NO-ENTRY SCS PLANT CODE : TSCA2 COMMON NAMES : Carolina hemlock TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of Carolina hemlock is Tsuga caroliniana Engelm. [12]. There are no recognized subspecies, varieties, or forms. LIFE FORM : Tree FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : Carolina hemlock is listed as rare in its natural range [11]. DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE SPECIES: Tsuga caroliniana GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Carolina hemlock has a very limited distribution. It occurs along the slopes of the Appalachian Mountains from southwestern Virginia and western North Carolina into South Carolina and northern Georgia [6,8,22]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES14 Oak - pine FRES15 Oak - hickory STATES : GA NC SC TN VA BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : NO-ENTRY KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K104 Appalachian oak forest K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest SAF COVER TYPES : 44 Chestnut oak 58 Yellow-poplar - eastern hemlock 59 Yellow-poplar - white oak - northern red oak 78 Virginia pine - oak 87 Sweet gum - yellow-poplar SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : NO-ENTRY MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS SPECIES: Tsuga caroliniana WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : The wood of Carolina hemlock can be used for lumber or pulpwood, but the species is so limited in extent that it is not considered commercially important [6,16]. -
November 27,2014 Available Description Potsize 4 Abies Alba
November 27,2014 Available Description Potsize 4 Abies alba Barabit's Spreader- std 24"hd #3 8 Abies alba Pendula #2 4 Abies alba Pendula #3 2 Abies alba Pendula #5 13 Abies alba Pyramidalis #3 213 Abies balsamea Nana #1 8 Abies balsamea Prostrata- std 18"hd #3 5 Abies balsamea Prostrata- std 2' #3 10 Abies cephalonica Meyer's Dwarf- std 18"hd #3 2 Abies concolor Blue Cloak #3 15 Abies concolor Candicans #3 8 Abies delavayi Herford #5 2 Abies forestii var. Forestii #5 20 Abies fraseri Klein's Nest- std 18"hd #3 28 Abies homolepis Tomomi- std 18"hd #3 11 Abies John's Pool #5 5 Abies koreana Gelbunt #1 7 Abies koreana Green Carpet #5 2 Abies koreana Oberon -std #3 2 Abies lasiocarpa Green Globe- 12" std #3 24 Abies lasiocarpa Green Globe #3 3 Abies nordmanniana Munsterland- std 18"hd #3 3 Abies nordmanniana Trautmann #5 2 Abies pinsapo Glauca #1 6 Abies pinsapo Glauca Nana #3 2 Abies procera Blaue Hexe- std 8"hd #3 4 Abies procera Prostrata #3 5 Abies procera Sherwoodii #3 5 Abies procera Sherwoodii #5 8 Abies veitchii Olivaceae #3 3 Abies veitchii var. Olivaceae #5 6 Acer griseum #3 1 Acer griseum #7 47 Acer griseum- 6'tall #5 14 Albizzia julibrissin #3 1 Albizzia julibrissin Summer Chocolate #3 5 Buxus microphylla John Baldwin #3 840 Buxus microphylla John Baldwin #1 20 Buxus sempervirens Faulkner #3 1 Buxus sempervirens Green Velvet #3 10 Buxus sempervirens Raket #3 263 Buxus sempervirens Suffruticosa #1 100 Buxus sempervirens Vardar Valley #1 185 Buxus sinica var. -
Susceptibility of Larch, Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, and Douglas-Fir to Phytophthora Ramorum1
Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fifth Science Symposium Susceptibility of Larch, Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, and 1 Douglas-fir to Phytophthora ramorum Gary Chastagner,2 Kathy Riley,2 and Marianne Elliott2 Introduction The recent determination that Phytophthora ramorum is causing bleeding stem cankers on Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi (Lam.) Carrière) in the United Kingdom (Forestry Commission 2012, Webber et al. 2010), and that inoculum from this host appears to have resulted in disease and canker development on other conifers, including western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), grand fir (Abies grandis (Douglas ex D. Don) Lindl.), and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière), potentially has profound implications for the timber industry and forests in the United States Pacific Northwest (PNW). A clearer understanding of the susceptibility of these conifers to P. ramorum is needed to assess the risk of this occurring in the PNW. Methods An experiment was conducted to examine the susceptibility of new growth on European (L. decidua Mill.), Japanese, eastern (L. laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch), and western larch (L. occidentalis Nutt.); western and eastern hemlock (T. canadensis (L.) Carrière); Sitka spruce; and a coastal seed source of Douglas-fir to three genotypes (NA1, NA2, and EU1) of P. ramorum in 2011. In 2012, a similar experiment was conducted using only the four larch species. Container-grown seedlings or saplings were used in all experiments. Five trees or branches of each species were inoculated with a single isolate of the three genotypes by spraying the foliage with a suspension of zoospores (105/ml). -
Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Fact Sheet
w Department of HEMLOCK WOOLLY ADELGID RK 4 ATE Environmental Adelges tsugae Conservation ▐ What is the hemlock woolly adelgid? The hemlock woolly adelgid, or HWA, is an invasive, aphid-like insect that attacks North American hemlocks. HWA are very small (1.5 mm) and often hard to see, but they can be easily identified by the white woolly masses they form on the underside of branches at the base of the needles. These masses or ovisacs can contain up to 200 eggs and remain present throughout the year. ▐ Where is HWA located? HWA was first discovered in New York State in 1985 in the lower White woolly ovisacs on an Hudson Valley and on Long Island. Since then, it has spread north to eastern hemlock branch Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, the Capitol Region and west through the Catskill Mountains to the Bugwood.org Finger Lakes Region, Buffalo and Rochester. In 2017, the first known occurrence in the Adirondack Park was discovered in Lake George. Where does HWA come from? Native to Asia, HWA was introduced to the western United States in the 1920s. It was first observed in the eastern US in 1951 near Richmond, Virginia after an accidental introduction from Japan. HWA has since spread along the East Coast from Georgia to Maine and now occupies nearly half the eastern range of native hemlocks. ▐ What does HWA do to trees? Once hatched, juvenile HWA, known as crawlers, search for suitable sites on the host tree, usually at the base of the needles. They insert their long mouthparts and begin feeding on the tree’s stored starches. -
Sass Forestecomgt 2018.Pdf
Forest Ecology and Management 419–420 (2018) 31–41 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Lasting legacies of historical clearcutting, wind, and salvage logging on old- T growth Tsuga canadensis-Pinus strobus forests ⁎ Emma M. Sassa, , Anthony W. D'Amatoa, David R. Fosterb a Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA b Harvard Forest, Harvard University, 324 N Main St, Petersham, MA 01366, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Disturbance events affect forest composition and structure across a range of spatial and temporal scales, and Coarse woody debris subsequent forest development may differ after natural, anthropogenic, or compound disturbances. Following Compound disturbance large, natural disturbances, salvage logging is a common and often controversial management practice in many Forest structure regions of the globe. Yet, while the short-term impacts of salvage logging have been studied in many systems, the Large, infrequent natural disturbance long-term effects remain unclear. We capitalized on over eighty years of data following an old-growth Tsuga Pine-hemlock forests canadensis-Pinus strobus forest in southwestern New Hampshire, USA after the 1938 hurricane, which severely Pit and mound structures damaged forests across much of New England. To our knowledge, this study provides the longest evaluation of salvage logging impacts, and it highlights developmental trajectories for Tsuga canadensis-Pinus strobus forests under a variety of disturbance histories. Specifically, we examined development from an old-growth condition in 1930 through 2016 across three different disturbance histories: (1) clearcut logging prior to the 1938 hurricane with some subsequent damage by the hurricane (“logged”), (2) severe damage from the 1938 hurricane (“hurricane”), and (3) severe damage from the hurricane followed by salvage logging (“salvaged”). -
Abstract Walker-Lane, Laura Newman
ABSTRACT WALKER-LANE, LAURA NEWMAN. The Effect of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Infestation on Water Relations of Carolina and Eastern Hemlock. (Under the direction of John Frampton.) In North America, hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA; Adelges tsugae Annand) is an exotic insect pest from Asia that is causing severe decimation of native eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.) and Carolina hemlock (Tsuga caroliniana Engelm.). Extensive research has been committed to the ecological impacts and potential control measures of HWA, but the exact physiological mechanisms that cause tree decline and mortality are not known. Eastern and Carolina hemlock may be reacting to infestation in a manner similar to the response of Fraser fir (Abies fraseri (Pursh.) Poir.) to infestation by balsam woolly adelgid (BWA; Adelges picea Ratz.). It is known that Fraser fir produces abnormal xylem in response to BWA feeding. This abnormal xylem obstructs water movement within the trees, causing Fraser fir to die of water-stress. In this study, water relations within 15 eastern and Carolina hemlock were evaluated to determine if infestation by HWA was causing water-stress. Water potential, carbon-13 isotope ratio, stem conductivity, and stomatal conductance measurements were conducted on samples derived from those trees. In addition, branch samples were analyzed for possible wood anatomy alterations as a result of infestation. Pre-dawn branch water potential (Ψ) measurements were more negative in infested hemlock than in non-infested trees. Carbon isotope ratios (normalized δ13C vs. VPDB) of the branches were more positive for infested trees, while stomatal conductance (gs) was lower in infested trees. These results indicate that infested eastern and Carolina hemlock are experiencing drought-like symptoms. -
Population Isolation Results in Unexpectedly High Differentiation in Carolina Hemlock (Tsuga Caroliniana), an Imperiled Southern Appalachian Endemic Conifer
Tree Genetics & Genomes (2017) 13:105 DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1189-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Population isolation results in unexpectedly high differentiation in Carolina hemlock (Tsuga caroliniana), an imperiled southern Appalachian endemic conifer Kevin M. Potter1 & Angelia Rose Campbell2 & Sedley A. Josserand3 & C. Dana Nelson3,4 & Robert M. Jetton5 Received: 16 December 2016 /Revised: 14 August 2017 /Accepted: 10 September 2017 # US Government (outside the USA) 2017 Abstract Carolina hemlock (Tsuga caroliniana Engelm.) is a range-wide sampling of the species. Data from 12 polymor- rare conifer species that exists in small, isolated populations phic nuclear microsatellite loci were collected and analyzed within a limited area of the Southern Appalachian Mountains for these samples. The results show that populations of of the USA. As such, it represents an opportunity to assess Carolina hemlock are extremely inbred (FIS =0.713)andsur- whether population size and isolation can affect the genetic prisingly highly differentiated from each other (FST =0.473) diversity and differentiation of a species capable of long- with little gene flow (Nm = 0.740). Additionally, most popu- distance gene flow via wind-dispersed pollen and seed. This lations contained at least one unique allele. This level of dif- information is particularly important in a gene conservation ferentiation is unprecedented for a North American conifer context, given that Carolina hemlock is experiencing mortality species. Numerous genetic clusters were inferred using two throughout -
Dry White Pine (Hemlock) Oak Forest
Dry white pine (hemlock) oak forest This community type occurs on fairly dry sites, often with 25% or more of the forest floor covered by rocks, boulders and/or exposed bedrock. The canopy may be somewhat open and tree growth somewhat suppressed. The tree stratum is dominated by a mixture of Pinus strobus (eastern white pine), or occasionally Tsuga canadensis (eastern hemlock), and a mixture of dry-site hardwoods, predominantly oaks. On most sites, the conifer and the hardwood component both range between 25% and 75% of the canopy. The oak species most often associated with this type are Quercus montana (chestnut oak), and Q. alba (white oak), although Q. velutina (black oak), Q. coccinea (scarlet oak), or Q. rubra (northern red oak) may also occur. Other associated trees include Nyssa sylvatica (black-gum), Betula lenta (sweet birch), Fraxinus americana (white ash), Prunus serotina (wild black cherry), and Castanea dentata (American chestnut) sprouts. There is often a heath-dominated shrub layer with Kalmia latifolia (mountain laurel) being especially important; Gaylussacia baccata (black huckleberry), Vaccinium spp. (blueberries), and Kalmia angustifolia (sheep laurel) are also common. Other shrubs, like Cornus florida (flowering dogwood), Hamamelis virginiana (witch-hazel), Viburnum acerifolium (maple-leaved viburnum) may also occur on less acidic sites. There is typically a sparse herbaceous layer with a northern affinity; Aralia nudicaulis (wild sarsaparilla), Pteridium aquilinum (bracken fern), Maianthemum canadense (Canada mayflower), Gaultheria procumbens (teaberry), Trientalis borealis (star-flower), and Medeola virginiana (Indian cumber-root) are typical. The successional status of this type seems variable, in some cases, especially on harsher sites, it appears relatively stable, in other cases it appears to be transitional.