The Armed Forces 88 Les Forces Armées – from the Institution to Profession – De L’Institution À La Profession Lieutenant General Dr Sorin IOAN Lieutenant-Général Dr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Authors assume full intellectual responsibility for the articles submitted to the editorial staff, in keeping with law no. 206, 27.05.2004 Romanian Military Thinking Journal is recognised by the National University Research Council and included in the “B” category Contents Contenu Editorial Editorial NATO – from Expectation to Certitude 7 OTAN – de l’espoir à la certitude Colonel Dr Mircea T~NASE Colonel dr. Mircea T~NASE NATO OTAN – in Celebration – – à son anniversaire – Romania in NATO – Achievements 13 Roumanie dans l’OTAN and Aspirations Five Years – les réalisations et les aspirations after Accession à cinq années après son adhésion Admiral Dr Gheorghe MARIN Amiral dr. Gheorghe MARIN Six Decades since the Establishment 17 Six décennies après la création of NATO de l’OTAN Colonel (r.) Dr Petre OTU Colonel (ret.) dr. Petre OTU NATO Transformation 33 La transformation and Enlargement et l’élargissement de l’OTAN Colonel Liviu BUMB~CEA Colonel Liviu BUMB~CEA The EU-NATO Strategic Partnership 44 Le parteneriat stratégique UE-OTAN Adriana CR~CIUNESCU Adriana CR~CIUNESCU Bucharest NATO Summit 48 Sommet de l’OTAN à Bucarest – an Element of Continuity – un élément de continuité Captain Vicen]iu C~T~NEANU Colonel Vicen]iu C~T~NEANU 3 Romanian Military Thinking ~ 1/2009 Perspectives on Developing 55 Perspectives de développement a Common Euro-Atlantic une stratégie de sécurité Security Strategy euro atlantique commune Second Lieutenant Sous-lieutenant Alexandru-Ovidiu BELEA Alexandru-Ovidiu BELEA Origin and Evolution 64 L’origine et l’évolution of the Partnership for Peace du Parteneriat pour la Paix Aurora-Denea GHEORGHI}~ Aurora-Denea GHEORGHI}~ Conceptual Projections Projections conceptuelles Trends in the Evolution 70 Tendances de l’évolution of International Security – the State de la sécurité internationale of Security in the Military Field (IV) – la condition de la sécurité General (r.) Dr Mihail ORZEA}~ dans le domaine militaire (IV) Général (ret.) dr. Mihail ORZEA}~ Knowing and Countering Risk 78 La connaissance et la lutte contre Factors and Vulnerabilities to Human les facteurs de risque et la vulnérabilité Security (I) à la sécurité de l’homme (I) Lieutenant General Lieutenant-général Dr Teodor FRUNZETI dr. Teodor FRUNZETI The Armed Forces 88 Les forces armées – from the Institution to Profession – de l’institution à la profession Lieutenant General Dr Sorin IOAN Lieutenant-général dr. Sorin IOAN Military Organisation 93 L’organisation militaire – Definition and Components – définition et composants Colonel Dr Gheorghe MOTOC Colonel dr. Gheorghe MOTOC The Concept of Strategic Paralysis (I)101Le concept de paralysie stratégique (I) Colonel Mircea MÎNDRESCU Colonel Mircea MÎNDRESCU 4 Contents Geopolitics • Geostrategy Geopolitique • Geostrategie International Security Securite internationale Contemporary Terrorist 107Organisations terroristes Organisations – Non-State Actor contemporaines – acteur non étatique with Major Implications for Security avec des implications majeures Major General Dr Ion-Aurel STANCIU pour la sécurité Général-major dr. Ion-Aurel STANCIU Some Considerations regarding 116Quelques considérations Globalisation and its Associated sur la mondialisation Phenomena et les phénomènes associés Colonel (r.) Alexandru IOAN Colonel (ret.) Alexandru IOAN Romania and the European Union 129Roumanie et Union européenne – Economic Security – la sécurité économique through Integration par l’intégration Colonel Liviu LUNGULESCU Colonel Liviu LUNGULESCU Opinions Opinions Information Operations 137Opérations informationnelles within Maritime Security Operations dans les opérations de sécurité maritime Captain Constantin CIOROBEA Colonel Constantin CIOROBEA Aspects of Using Outer Space 147Aspects de l’utilisation de l’espace for Military Purposes extra atmosphérique Colonel Nicolaie BUZATU pour des fins militaires Colonel Nicolaie BUZATU International Connexions Connections internationales Montenegro, NATO and a New State’s153Le Monténégro, l’OTAN et la sécurité Security d’un nouvel Etat Boro VUCINIC< Boro VUCINIC< 5 Romanian Military Thinking ~ 1/2009 The Gulf and NATO 158Le Golfe et l’OTAN – Time to Revisit Relations – c’est le temps de revoir ses relations Abdulaziz SAGER Abdulaziz SAGER The Joint Operating 162The Joint Operating Environment 2008 – Challenges Environment 2008 – Challenges and Implications and Implications for the Future Joint Force (I) for the Future Joint Force (I) ,,, Pages in the National Pages de l histoire Military History militaire nationale Historical Study of the Terms 175Etude diachronique des termes for the Tasks Carried Out des fonctions remplies aboard Ships au bord des navires Alina BALAGIU Alina BALAGIU Military Journalistic 183 Univers journalistique Universe militaire Editorial Events 187 Evenements editoriaux Abstracts 194 Resumes 6 NATO – from Expectation to Certitude – ix decades ago, on April 4, 1949, the USA and other 11 European countries agreed on the establishment of an element meant to secure S and guarantee the democratic regimes threatened by the Communist scourge that seemed contagious in a Europe shaken by war, thus achieving a performance that was worth envying: discouraging, through making the adversary acknowledge its potential for riposte, any attempt to assault the European democratic values and to limit the evil that struggled hard to extend over our old continent and to impose a strange, unnatural and inhumane social system on it. A political-military alliance generating security and, consequently, stability in a Europe that was vulnerable through its own suspicion and fragile because of its frequent ideological oscillations, NATO was an aspiration we had to nurture, for a long time, only expecting that one day we could express our own option. Situated, through the force of an unjust fate, at the edge of some empires whose fluid borders used to be overstepped, Romania often had to seek for alliances to protect its national essence and to fulfil the destiny that was in store for it in this corner of the continent. The choice it made or, many times, the imposition of the allies did not always prove to be the most fortunate one. When, after breaking loose from a system that was alien to the spirit of our people, we created the favourable conditions for an intelligent choice, we opted, in a broad national consensus, at the beginning of the ’90s, to join an alliance that we sincerely envied yet we wanted to be part of it. We chose what we believed to be most suitable for us to be guaranteed a genuine security, in the spirit of our nation real values that proved to be democratic. We opted for collective defence within NATO. As it was natural, the process of accession followed a road map, far from having been merely formal. Besides the interest in the own security 7 Romanian Military Thinking ~ 1/2009 the North Atlantic Alliance sought to safeguard in this area, the states that aspired to become members of the Alliance had to demonstrate their will to achieve it. Romania proved it wanted and was able to do it. Taking part in a race at the end of which it had to win, Romania mobilised its full potential to sip out of the victory cup on April 5, 2004, when it adhered to the North Atlantic Treaty. Raising our tricolour at the NATO Headquarters in Brussels marked the moment of achieving a major national desideratum, that of being part of a system that can offer the most important security guarantee possible in the world today. Our coming back in the great family of democratic nations was accompanied by a strong engagement and sacrifices that were mostly felt by the military. Vector of stability and element of genuine credibility, the Romanian Armed Forces were the main artisan and the most powerful engine of this national effort. Their role of fundamental actor in the accession process, played with abnegation and devotion, has to be fully recognised. At the end of a road that was not easy at all and that was sometimes obstructed by the hesitations of a political class that did not remain connected to the challenge of the final goal all the time, the armed forces demonstrated, in an exemplary way, that they understood to assume the own reform as a prerequisite for the accomplishment of their new missions within NATO. It is because the Alliance is not only an umbrella to safeguard its members. Besides the security guarantees the Alliance offers, being a member of it requires seriousness and political maturity. The transformation of the military body, necessary for it to tailor to the structures of the North Atlantic Alliance, has entailed generating and supporting an ample restructuring process that, although painful for a part of the military, aims at achieving full interoperability with allied armed forces. Assuming this transformation as a key instrument for the enhancement of the state armed power has obviously led to the Romanian Armed Forces being credited as supplier of regional stability and security within the Alliance. The engagement, alongside with the partner armed forces, in the fight against terrorism, in NATO-led operations, is a certain proof of the Romanian Armed Forces assuming and responsibly fulfilling their obligations within the Alliance. A change in attitude at the level of the strategic vision, as well as at the level of the individual mindset and at the one of the military culture in general, was indeed necessary. The capacity to adapt to novelty, the enthusiasm in accomplishing missions alongside the militaries in the Alliance have eloquently