DOCSLIB.ORG

Melancholy Justice: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court During the Gilded Age

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Melancholy Justice: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court During the Gilded Age is published tlTrce tillles a ye,H' in Morch, .lui)" ond November by BL1ckwdl Publishing, Inc. wirh otfices at 350 Moin 9600 Road, Oxford OX4 27,<j, and .'Asia') 155 Cremorne St., Richmond VIC JI21, .AlIstralia. Bbckwell Publishing, Inc. is now parc of Information for Subscribers For new oders, rennv"ls. sample copy requests. cidims, of add",'''' and "II other correspondences contact the Journals Dq"'rt111ent ,)[ your !learnt Blackwell of'ficc phone: +44 (0) 1865-778315, Fax: +44 (0) 1865-471775, [mai!: US oFfice phone: 800-835-6770 or 78 I -388-8599, 1.1\: 781-388-8232, Email: f\si.1 o(lice H,5 6511 ROOO, ['ax: +44 (0) 1865-471775, E111']il Subscription Rates t'Or Volume 33, 2008 Institutional Premium R,lle: The Allleric.1S $ 156, Rest o(\Vorid 1: 120; print ,md online-only rlles Arc also available. Single ["lie Rates: InstitutiOn>: The Americas :-:57, Rest of \Vorld Prices include of print to rhe addre". Delivery Cerrm arc Delivered DUlY the recif)icnt is responsible for pa)'mg Jny imf'l)n duty or t3XCS. Legal tidc [",,,es to the customer on despatch by our distribuwl·s. Customers in Ccmda should add 5% CST to the ilmcric.1S rdre or cI'lcb,ce of entitlement to exemption. Customers In the \ K"nd EU should Jdd VAT at 7% to the Rest of\Vorld rale or provide J VAT numbCl or cI'idcnce of' entitlcmcll[ [0 exemprion. For more inf;)rlll.1tion "bolil online ,Kce" to BI.,ckwcll Publishing JOlll'l1ais, J(CC'SS infornl,:uion Jnd terms ;)nd conditions, pIC,l,)t' visit \V\vw.black\-\,E'llpllblishing.com. Ocher pricing optiolls for iJlstirurjon~ arc also available on Ollr website. or on request ('roln our cll~romcr service dt~parrlllcnt, rei: 1-800-835-6770 or + I 78 r 388-8599 office' (0) 1865-778315 (UK office) or +G5 6511 8000 office ). This is Jvailablt' online at V,SIt to scarch the articles Jnd for table of contents (-mail ,liens. Elecrronic Access Abstract information for' this journal is c1eClroniully ,wailable a[ J,ttp://www.bbekwfllpubllShlllg. COIll/jsch, For informJrion on full-text ,1ccrss, sec www.bhckwcllpublishing.com. Back Issues is'511e:) from current and recent volumes are JV;libblc;H rhe current issue pnce from ["!JCkwell Publishing Eadier is~uc.') mclY be ObL-:titlcd from PCrlodic:1L", Service 11 Main Srrccr, C'JcnnJnrowll. NY 12526, Tel: +15185374700, Fax: +15185375899, Em"il: [email protected]. Mailing Jomn:d is 111Jilcd St"n,Lu\l RJtc MaJ!ing to rest of world 10)' IMEX (Intern,Hional Moil J ClIl']dian mail is sellt by Canadian ~'ublicdtions Illail number 40573520. PO~o 1 \;tASTER: Send all address changes to Journal of Supreme Court History, Blackwell Publishing Inc., Journals Subscription Department, -'ISO Mai.n St., Malden, MA 0214R-5020. Copyright 1\11 reservcc1 by the purposrs of rE'sc<1t'ch or or crltici~m or rcvicv'/ J 110 pan 01 rhi:-- Ill;=tl/ be reproduccd, ~turcd, or tran~!nlttcd in ,]I1Y I-onn or by any mCJllS WIthout prior permission lfl from the to photocopy !tems for internal "nd use is gl'al1tcd by the copyright holder fat' libl·aric.s dnd orher USCIS of rhe Copyrighc CIc.lr.1ncc Center 222 Rosewood Drive. Donl'cr" MA 01923, L'SA provided the "PI'l'Opriatl' Icc is paid CCc. This consent does not.extcnd to otber kinds of cop)ing, sllch as copying f~)[" disrribution for 0[" purpose'), (or 101' res,lie. Institutions with J [,aid to this journal mal' make photocopies for ['UI,[,O)"', free of proVided such copies dre not resold. For dll other requests to rC}'lIb!ish marer;,,1 111 another work conUct JOlll'IlJIs Rights & Perll1issions CoordillJtor. Blc1ckwell Publishing, ')600 RO;1c1, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK, UK I mail: [email protected]. Advertising For ;:tdvcrrising inforillation, visit rhe jOl1!"nal's websier rir www.bJacb.vcllpublishillg.com/]SCI-J or contact the Advcnisin0 S.11cs Coordin;Hor, Jt 350 M"in Sr.M"lden, MA 02148. Phone: 781-388-8532, Fax: 781-338-8532. Thls Jllurnal is printed on 'Kid-lice p,'per. SUPREME COUR T HISTORIC AL SOCIETY HONORARY CHAIRMAN John G. Roberts, Jr. HONORARY TRUSTEE Sandra Day O'Connor CHAIRMAN EMERITUS Dwight D. Opperman CHAIRMAN Leon Silverman PRESIDENT Frank C. Jones VICE PRESIDENTS Vincent C. Burke, III Dorothy Tapper Goldman E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. Ralph 1. Lancaster, J r. SECRETARY Virgin ia Warren Daly TREASURER Sheldon S. Cohen TRUSTEES George R. Adams Frank G. Jones Sally Rider J. Bruce Alverson Robb M. Jones J o nath ~n c. Rose Peter G. Angelos Gregory Josep h Richard A. Schneider Martha Barnett Philip Allen Lacovara David Scott David J. Beck Jerome B. Libin Jay Sekulow Herman Bel.z Joan Lukey Nicole K. Seligman Hugo L. Black, Jr. Maureen E. Mahoney Steven R. Shapiro Nancy Brennan Mrs. Thurgood Marshall Jerold S. Solovy Beth S. Bri nkmann Thurgood Marshall, Jr. Kenneth W Starr Leono ra Burger Timothy Mayopoulos Mathew D. Staver Patricia Dwinncll Buder Stephen R. McAllister Mrs. Potter Stewart Edmund N. C~rpenter II Teri McClure Cathleen Douglas Stone Charles J. Cooper Gregory Michael Mikel L. Stout Mi ch~eI A. Cooper Jeffrey R. Minear Dennis R. Suplee Harlan R. Crow Josep h R. Moderow Larry Thompson James C. Duff Mtchael Mone Seth P. Wnm:m Wtlltam Edlund Lucas Morel Agnes N. Willtams James D. Ellis Charles Morgan W Wayne Withers Mtgue1 A. Estrada J~mes W Morrts, III W. Foster Wollen Davtd Frederick John M. Nannes Donald Wrtght Charles 0. Ga lvin Ri ck D. Nydegger Robert E. Ju ceam Kenneth S. Geller James B. O'Hara General C~I/I1sel Frank B. Gibert Theodore B. Olsen James L. Goldman Brian B. O'Neill David T Pride Robert J. Grey, Jr. D~vtd Onorato Exec"UI ive Director Frank Gundlach Carrer G. Phillips Kathleen Shurtleff Robert A. Gwinn Leon Polsky Assistant Director Benjamin Het nema n Harry M. Re asoner Allen Hill Bernard Reese A.E. Dick Howa rd Charles B. Renfrew JOURNAL OF SUPREME COURT HISTORY 2008 vol. 33 no. 2 PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE James B. O'Hara, Chairman Donald B. Ayer Louis R. Cohen Lucas Morel Luther T Munford David O'Brien Carter G. Phillips E. Barrett Prettyman, J r. Michael Russ D. Grier Stephenson, Jr. Melvin 1. Urofsky BOARD OF EDITORS Melvin 1. Urofsky, Chairman Herman Belz David J. Bodenhamer Craig Joyce D avid O'Brien Michael Parrish L.A. Powe, Jr. Sandra VanBurkleo MANAGING EDITOR Clare Cushman Blackwell Publlshmg, Boscon, M.ls SJchuscrts &. Oxford, UK GENERAL STATEMENT The a private non-profit is dedicated to the collecriou and of the Court of the United States. in the District of Columbia iu 1974, It was founded by ChiefJustice Warren E. who served as its first honorary chairman. The SocidY accomplishes its mission by educatiOnal programs, historical research, publishing books, journals, and electronic materials, and by ""'PeTIn,\) to the Court's history. These activities and others increase the public's awareness of the Court's contributrons to our nation's rich constitutional The Society maintains an educational outreach program mClec,ra:na'llIg of the Court, the Constitution and the cosponsors Street Law Inc:s summer institute, school teachers to educate their students about the Court and the Constitution. It also sponsors an annual lecture series at the well as occasional public lectures around the countty. The Society maintains Its own educational website and cosponsors a website that curriculum support reachers about important Court cases. In terms of the distributes a newsletter to its members containing short historical pieces on the Court and articles describing the Society's programs and activities. It also publishes the Journal of Supreme Court a scholarly collection of articles and book reviews, which appears in March, July and November. The awards cash prizes to students and established scholars to promote scholarshIp. The Society Initiated the History of the Court of the United States, 178r-1800 in 1977 with a grant from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission The seeks to reconstruct an accurate record of the of the federal In the formative decade between and 1800 because records ftom this rr11mr,lp,·p or The Court became a cosponsor in then the project has LVJLIl~"':lXU seven out of the volumes. An ora! program in which former Solicitors General, former Attorneys General, and retired are interviewed is another research sponsored by (he The Society maintains a program that has interest books: The Supreme Court Illustrated Biographies 178r-1995 short illustrated biographies of the 108 Justices; Supreme Court Decisions and \\lomens Rights: Milestones to (2000), a guide to Court Cases for and About School Students a school textbook writren by Raskin; and Black \\lhite and Brown: The Landmark School Desegregation Case in t<ptr""n,ert a collection to mark the anniversary of rhe Brown case. is also program, which has substantially contributed to of the Court's permanent collection of busts as well as papers, and artifacts and memorabilia These materials the Court Curator's Office for the benefit of the Court's one million annual Visitors. The 6,000 members whose financial support and volunteer in the Society's and ad hoc committees enables tbe to function. These cornrnircees report to an elected Board ofTrustees and an Executive Committee, the latter of which is principally for policy decisions and for the Society's permanent staff. for additional mformation should be directed to the headquarters at 224 East 543-0400, or to the Society's websltc ae The has to receive tax deductible SOl (c)(J)Ofihc Intern,,! Rtvcnuc JOURNAL OF SUPREME COURT HISTOR Y 2008, vol.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Judicial Lockjaw”: the Debate Over Extrajudicial Activity
    \\server05\productn\N\NYU\82-2\NYU205.txt unknown Seq: 1 18-APR-07 8:21 UNDERSTANDING “JUDICIAL LOCKJAW”: THE DEBATE OVER EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY LESLIE B. DUBECK* Federal judges are expected to conduct themselves differently than their counter- parts in the political branches. This Note considers the policy and historical rea- sons used to justify this different standard of conduct and concludes that these justifications are largely unsupported or overstated. These erroneous justifications obfuscate the debate over extrajudicial conduct and may result in a suboptimal level of extrajudicial activity. INTRODUCTION In 2006, news coverage of the State of the Union address included an analysis of the behavior of the four Supreme Court Justices in attendance. The Washington Post reported: “When Bush said ‘We love our freedom, and we will fight to keep it,’ Thomas looked at Roberts, who looked at Breyer, who gave an approving shrug; all four gentlemen stood and gave unanimous applause.”1 This brief episode illustrates three important points: First, there is a deep- seated understanding that federal judges are held to a different stan- dard of behavior than their counterparts in the legislative and execu- tive branches. Although audience members on both sides of the aisle were applauding, the Justices hesitated to do so. Second, it is difficult to identify exactly what is expected of judges. The Justices had to confer to determine whether applause would be appropriate. Third, the public is aware of the special behavior expected of judges. The Washington Post found it relevant enough to warrant a story the fol- lowing morning. Sixty years before this incident, Justice Felix Frankfurter noted that he suffered from “judicial lockjaw”2—a phenomenon of self- censorship that prevents judges from speaking about the judicial pro- cess and from pursuing extrajudicial activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah Haynes Swayne
    Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne (December 7, 1804 – June 8, 1884) was an Noah Haynes Swayne American jurist and politician. He was the first Republican appointed as a justice to the United States Supreme Court. Contents Birth and early life Supreme Court service Retirement, death and legacy See also Notes References Further reading Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States In office Birth and early life January 24, 1862 – January 24, 1881 Nominated by Abraham Lincoln Swayne was born in Frederick County, Virginia in the uppermost reaches of the Shenandoah Valley, approximately 100 miles (160 km) Preceded by John McLean northwest of Washington D.C. He was the youngest of nine children of Succeeded by Stanley Matthews [1] Joshua Swayne and Rebecca (Smith) Swayne. He was a descendant Personal details of Francis Swayne, who emigrated from England in 1710 and settled Born December 7, 1804 near Philadelphia.[2] After his father died in 1809, Noah was educated Frederick County, Virginia, U.S. locally until enrolling in Jacob Mendendhall's Academy in Waterford, Died June 8, 1884 (aged 79) Virginia, a respected Quaker school 1817-18. He began to study New York City, New York, U.S. medicine in Alexandria, Virginia, but abandoned this pursuit after his teacher Dr. George Thornton died in 1819. Despite his family having Political party Democratic (Before 1856) no money to support his continued education, he read law under John Republican (1856–1890) Scott and Francis Brooks in Warrenton, Virginia, and was admitted to Spouse(s) Sarah Swayne the Virginia Bar in 1823.[3] A devout Quaker (and to date the only Quaker to serve on the Supreme Court), Swayne was deeply opposed to slavery, and in 1824 he left Virginia for the free state of Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Supreme Court History Index
    INDEX TO THE JOURNAL OF SUPREME COURT HISTORY VOLUMES 1-44 (1976-2019) By JOEL FISHMAN, Ph.D., M.L.S. Associate Director for Lawyer Services, Emeritus Duquesne University Center for Legal Information/ Allegheny County Law Library Pittsburgh, PA Washington: The Supreme Court Historical Society, 2020 Copyright: The Supreme Court Historical Society, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents I. CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. AUTHOR INDEX.......................................................................................................................................... 39 III. TITLE INDEX ............................................................................................................................................. 73 IV. SUBJECT INDEX ...................................................................................................................................... 108 1. Introductions ................................................................................................................................................. 108 2. Articles. .......................................................................................................................................................... 111 Administrative Law ......................................................................................................................................... 111 Admiralty Law ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of •Œmelville Weston Fuller,•Š by Willard L. King
    Washington University Law Review Volume 1951 Issue 1 January 1951 Review of “Melville Weston Fuller,” By Willard L. King David Fellman University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Recommended Citation David Fellman, Review of “Melville Weston Fuller,” By Willard L. King, 1951 WASH. U. L. Q. 146 (1951). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol1951/iss1/16 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 146 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY MELI=vz WESTON FULLER. By Willard L. King. New York: Macmillan. 1950. Pp. 394. $5.00. One of the most significant facts about the United States Supreme Court has been the longevity of the Justices. When Justice Minton was appointed in October, 1949, he became the eighty-seventh member of the Court. Chief Justice Vinson, who took his oath of office on June 24, 1946, is the thirteenth Chief Justice in our history. The average length of service for a member of the Supreme Court has been a little over fifteen years. Eight Justices have served thirty years or more. In view of the tremendous authority of the Supreme Court as a central agency in the American governmental system, these facts point up a remarkable concentration of power in a very small group of men. Appointed by the President with senatorial confirma- tion, and enjoying life tenure, these men shape our basic law and determine important segments of public policy without fear of political interference or of retribution at the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln's Appointment of United States Justice Samuel F. Miller
    The Annals of Iowa Volume 33 Number 7 (Winter 1957) pps. 510-525 Lincoln's Appointment of United States Justice Samuel F. Miller David M. Silver ISSN 0003-4827 No known copyright restrictions. Recommended Citation Silver, David M. "Lincoln's Appointment of United States Justice Samuel F. Miller." The Annals of Iowa 33 (1957), 510-525. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17077/0003-4827.7444 Hosted by Iowa Research Online Lincoln's Appointment of United States Justice Samuel F. Miller By DAVID M. SILVER* Abraham Lincoln was to be privileged to appoint five men to the United States Supreme Court, and a Lin- coln appointee was to linger on the bench until 1897. Consequently, Lincoln's direct infiuence upon the court may be said to have endured until that time. Two main factors controlled the administration's ap- pointments to the court. Lincoln's demand that the se- lectees have sound views toward the great political issues of the Civil war, and the political forces that guided his selections. Lincoln did not regard legal training and judicial ex- perience as primary requirements. This was in har- mony with his policy of refusing to grant the court the right to provide the final answer on questions that were of political nature. He believed that many men rather than few could meet the requirements for membership on the bench. An analysis of the previous experience of Lincoln's appointees reveals how little their past activity guided him . president Lincoln demanded sound views on the war rather than extensive service in the state courts or the lower Federal courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Constricting the Law of Freedom: Justice Miller, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Slaughter-House Cases - Freedom: Constitutional Law
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 70 Issue 2 Symposium on the Law of Freedom Part Article 8 I: Freedom: Personal Liberty and Private Law December 1994 Constricting the Law of Freedom: Justice Miller, The Fourteenth Amendment, and the Slaughter-House Cases - Freedom: Constitutional Law Richard L. Aynes Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard L. Aynes, Constricting the Law of Freedom: Justice Miller, The Fourteenth Amendment, and the Slaughter-House Cases - Freedom: Constitutional Law, 70 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 627 (1994). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol70/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CONSTRICTING THE LAW OF FREEDOM: JUSTICE MILLER, THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES RICHARD L. AYNES* "[O]ne of the canons of construction never to be lost sight of is to give effect, if possible, to every word of the written law." Fourteenth Amendment author John A. Bingham' "Criticism of [the Slaughter-HouseCases] has never entirely ceased, nor has it ever received universal assent by members of this Court." Justice William Moody2 INTRODUCHION The Slaughter-House Cases3 are simultaneously unremarkable and extraordinary. They are unremarkable because the matter at is- sue-whether butchers can be required to ply their trade at a central, state-franchised facility-has long since ceased to be a matter of con- cern.
    [Show full text]
  • Justices of the Supreme Court Justices of the Supreme Court, 1789 to 2008 1
    ø1570¿ 1570 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, 1789 TO 2008 1 Years 2 State whence ap- Date of com- Date service Name 3 of pointed mission terminated service CHIEF JUSTICES 1. John Jay ................................. New York .............. Sept. 26, 1789 June 29, 1795 5 2. John Rutledge ........................ South Carolina ..... July 1, 1795 Dec. 15, 1795 (4)(5) 3. Oliver Ellsworth .................... Connecticut ........... Mar. 4, 1796 Dec. 15, 1800 4 4. John Marshall ........................ Virginia ................. Jan. 31, 1801 July 6, 1835 34 5. Roger Brooke Taney .............. Maryland ............... Mar. 15, 1836 Oct. 12, 1864 28 6. Salmon Portland Chase ........ Ohio ....................... Dec. 6, 1864 May 7, 1873 8 7. Morrison Remick Waite ........ ....do ....................... Jan. 21, 1874 Mar. 23, 1888 14 8. Melville Weston Fuller .......... Illinois ................... July 20, 1888 July 4, 1910 21 9. Edward Douglas White ......... Louisiana .............. Dec. 12, 1910 May 19, 1921 5 10 10. William Howard Taft ............ Connecticut ........... June 30, 1921 Feb. 3, 1930 8 11. Charles Evans Hughes .......... New York .............. Feb. 13, 1930 June 30, 1941 5 11 12. Harlan Fiske Stone ............... ......do ..................... July 3, 1941 Apr. 22, 1946 5 4 13. Fred Moore Vinson ................ Kentucky ............... June 21, 1946 Sept. 8, 1953 7 14. Earl Warren ........................... California .............. Oct. 2, 1953 June 23, 1969 15 15. Warren E. Burger .................. Virginia ................. June 23, 1969 Sept. 26, 1986 17 16. William Hubbs Rehnquist .... Virginia ................. Sept. 25, 1986 Sept. 5, 2005 5 19 17. John G. Roberts, Jr. .............. Maryland ............... Sept. 29, 2005 ........................ ............ ASSOCIATE JUSTICES 1. John Rutledge ........................ South Carolina ..... Sept. 26, 1789 Mar. 5, 1791 1 2. William Cushing .................... Massachusetts ...... Sept. 27, 1789 Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • I Give Permission for Public Access to My Honors Paper and for Any
    I give permission for public access to my Honors paper and for any copying or digitization to be done at the discretion of the College Archivist and/or the College Librarian. Signed______________________________________ Joe Angelillo Date______________________ The Nomination of L.Q.C. Lamar to the Supreme Court: Popular Constitutionalism, the Reconstruction Amendments, and the End of Reconstruction Joe Angelillo Department of History Rhodes College Memphis, Tennessee 2020 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts degree with Honors in History ii This Honors paper by Joe Angelillo has been read and approved for Honors in History. Dr. Timothy Huebner Project Advisor ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Dr. Robert Saxe Second Reader ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Dr. Ali Masood Extra-Departmental Reader ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Dr. Jeffrey Jackson Department Chair ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I am deeply indebted to Dr. Timothy Huebner for this project. He provided the idea that became this thesis and has guided me through this and several endeavors at Rhodes College. I would not be a historian today without him. I must also acknowledge my readers, Dr. Robert Saxe and Dr. Ali Masood, who provided essential comments that helped me refine my arguments. I am quite grateful for their time and assistance. Finally, the staff at the Paul Barrett Junior Library, particularly Kenan Padgett, Bill Short, Amanda Ford, and Caitlin Gewin all helped me acquire sources for this project. For this, I am very appreciative. iv Contents Signature Page ii Acknowledgements iii Contents iv List of Illustrations and Tables v Abstract vi Introduction 1 Chapter One: Origins of the Lamar Nomination 10 Chapter Two: The Nomination and Constitutional Interpretation 39 Conclusion: The End of Reconstruction 69 Bibliography 74 v List of Illustrations and Tables Figure 1: L.Q.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The 140Th Anniversary of the Fourteenth Amendment Elizabeth Reilly
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals June 2015 Infinite Hope - Introduction to the Symposium: The 140th Anniversary of the Fourteenth Amendment Elizabeth Reilly Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Reilly, Elizabeth (2009) "Infinite Hope - Introduction to the Symposium: The 140th Anniversary of the Fourteenth Amendment," Akron Law Review: Vol. 42 : Iss. 4 , Article 1. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol42/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Reilly: Introduction REILLY_INTRO_COPYFORPRINTER_FINAL.DOC 6/30/2009 3:28 PM INFINITE HOPE INTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM: THE 140TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT Elizabeth Reilly∗ I. Introduction ..................................................................... 1003 II. Symposium Articles ........................................................ 1012
    [Show full text]
  • A Lost World: Sallie Robinson, the Civil Rights Cases, and Missing Narratives of Slavery in the Supreme Court's Reconstruction Jurisprudence
    A Lost World: Sallie Robinson, the Civil Rights Cases, and Missing Narratives of Slavery in the Supreme Court's Reconstruction Jurisprudence ADERSON BELLEGARDE FRANCË OIS* ªIt is the sound of vanishingÐthe music as it plays itself to silence, the train as it travels away, a voice left on magnetic tape.º1 The Supreme Court tells stories about who and what we areÐthe sort of ªknowledge about [the] past that is shared, mutually acknowledged and re- inforced by a collectivity.º2 The Court is uniquely suited for this role: not just because of the moral authority it brings to the task of adjudication, and not just because of the rituals it uses for its decisionmaking, but also because the very act of telling and retelling in issuing decisions results in layers of these stories being deposited on and shaping constitutional doc- trine. In time, and with each iterationÐlike sandy water ¯owing over sedi- mentary rockÐthese stories settle, gather together, harden, and become part of constitutional topographyÐsheer repetition makes them rei®ed. These stories, a mix of fact and aspiration, a mingling of doctrine and meta- phors, rubbed smooth of contradictions, translated for public consumption, even when hotly contested in the caverns of academia, keep us bound to a ªconscious community of memory,º3Ða pact about the larger lessons to be derived from our past. There is a federalism story about how the Founders' experience with a distant, indifferent king led them to set up a government with de®ned limited federal power; a free-speech story about how our col- lective ability to think and speak freely contributes to an open marketplace of ideas; and a right-to-bear-arms story about how the Second Amendment serves as a bulwark against government tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • 1075 Ø950¿ Justices of the Supreme Court
    950 950 ¿950¿ JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, 1789 TO 1995 1 Years 2 State whence ap- Date of com- Date service Name 3 of pointed mission terminated service CHIEF JUSTICES 1. John Jay .................................. New York .............. Sept. 26, 1789 June 29, 1795 5 2. John Rutledge 4 ....................... South Carolina ..... July 1, 1795 Dec. 15, 1795 (5) 3. Oliver Ellsworth ..................... Connecticut ........... Mar. 4, 1796 Dec. 15, 1800 4 4. John Marshall ......................... Virginia ................. Jan. 31, 1801 July 6, 1835 34 5. Roger Brooke Taney ............... Maryland .............. Mar. 15, 1836 Oct. 12, 1864 28 6. Salmon Portland Chase ......... Ohio ....................... Dec. 6, 1864 May 7, 1873 8 7. Morrison Remick Waite ......... ....do ....................... Jan. 21, 1874 Mar. 23, 1888 14 8. Melville Weston Fuller ........... Illinois ................... July 20, 1888 July 4, 1910 21 9. Edward Douglas White .......... Louisiana .............. Dec. 12, 1910 May 19, 1921 5 10 10. William Howard Taft ............. Connecticut ........... June 30, 1921 Feb. 3, 1930 8 11. Charles Evans Hughes ........... New York .............. Feb. 13, 1930 June 30, 1941 5 11 12. Harlan Fiske Stone ................ ......do ..................... July 3, 1941 Apr. 22, 1946 5 4 13. Fred Moore Vinson ................. Kentucky ............... June 21, 1946 Sept. 8, 1953 7 14. Earl Warren ............................ California .............. Oct. 2, 1953 June 23, 1969 15 15. Warren E. Burger ................... Virginia ................. June 23, 1969 Sept. 26, 1986 17 16. William Hubbs Rehnquist ..... Virginia ................. Sept. 25, 1986 ........................ (5) ASSOCIATE JUSTICES 1. John Rutledge ......................... South Carolina ..... Sept. 26, 1789 Mar. 5, 1791 1 2. William Cushing ..................... Massachusetts ...... Sept. 27, 1789 Sept. 13, 1810 20 3. James Wilson .......................... Pennsylvania ........ Sept. 29, 1789 Aug. 21, 1798 8 4. John Blair ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Green on Ross, 'Justice of Shattered Dreams: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court During the Civil War Era'
    H-CivWar Green on Ross, 'Justice of Shattered Dreams: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court during the Civil War Era' Review published on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 Michael A. Ross. Justice of Shattered Dreams: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court during the Civil War Era. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2003. xxii + 323 pp. $69.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8071-2868-8; $25.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8071-2924-1. Reviewed by Michael Green (Department of History, Community College of Southern Nevada.) Published on H-CivWar (March, 2006) Scholars of the Supreme Court often have referred to particular "seats." For example, Benjamin Cardozo, Felix Frankfurter, Arthur Goldberg, and Abe Fortas succeeded one another in the "Jewish seat." Frankfurter also held the "scholar's seat" previously occupied by Horace Gray, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Cardozo. It may be time to add the "maverick" seat, which only three men have held in ninety years: Louis Brandeis, William O. Douglas, and John Paul Stevens, all of whom have been known to dissent strongly and to take often lonely, controversial stands. But before Brandeis, Douglas, and Stevens, that seat on the Supreme Court belonged for twenty-eight years to Samuel Freeman Miller. The name is familiar to scholars of the Supreme Court, possibly to Civil War historians interested in the court in that era, and to those who encountered Charles Fairman's 1939 biography, Mr. Justice Miller and the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, Miller's name has been largely lost to most Americans, except perhaps as the author of the 1873 Slaughterhouse decision, a ruling widely perceived as driving a large nail in the coffin of black civil rights.
    [Show full text]