Amended Admiralty Rule 5)4
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1890 REFERENCE INDEX Page Customary visit to President postponed 1 Miller, J., death of (Oct. I5, I89O) announced 2 Miller, J., resolutions of the bar presented 61 Brown, J., "qualified" 76 Court adjourned because of absence of Justices who accompanied body of Justice Miller 5 Adjournment of a month (Feb. 2 to March 2) 103 Allotment orders 21, Territories assigned to circuits 20l|. Rule 55 (writ of error under Act of Feb* 6, 1889, 55 Stat* 656) promulgated 21 Rule 8 amended 105 Rule 9 amended IO5 Rule 35, 56, 37, 38 (March 3, I89I Act establishing CCA) promulgated 202 Equity rule 6? amended 20lj. Admiralty rule 5)4. amended I0I4. Brief stricken from files (IO99) 77 In forma pauperis granted - record to be printed at public expense (I3II, 1607, ex parte Wilson) 21, II3 Costs - motion for attachment to enforce payment of denied (1280) 2ll|. - 2 - Page Bail granted (I5 Orig. ) 195 Judgment nunc pro tunc (92 of 1889* 126, 229) 115, 115, 161 Writ of error - leave granted to amend mder sec. 1105 Rev. Stat. (I525) I30 Dismissal by appellant - motion to file reasons for denied (U.S. v. Griffith, No. Ill;) see opinion iLil U.S. 212 5I]. : From CLERK'S/OFF SUPREME COURT U. S. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Monday, October 13, 1890. The court met pursuant to law. Present : The Chief-Justice and all of the Associate Justices, except Mr. Justice Miller and Mr. Justice Field. The Chief-Justice said The court reassembles under the shadow of impending affliction. The visit customarily paid to the President of the United States on the first day of the term will be postponed. Cases assigned for the second Monday of the term (October 20) will be set down for the third Monday of the term, the 27th of October. Applications for admissions to the bar will be entertained, and after they are disposed of the court will adjourn until to-morrow. William E.. Day and Joseph Frease, of Canton, Ohio, Frank J. Craw- ford, of Chicago, 111., I. W. Stephens, of Weatherford, Tex., Fred. B. Dodge, of Minneapolis, Minn., J. C. Gilmore, of New Orleans, La., Thomas S. Riley, of Wheeling, W. Ya., Wm. H. O'Hara and Daniel Davenport, of Bridgeport, Conn., E-ichard H. Savage, of San Francisco, Cal., W. B. Stoddard, of New Haven, Conn., and Samuel B. Adams, of Savannah, Ga., were admitted to practice. Adjourned until to- ^orrow at twelve o'clock. 11038 1 : SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Tuesday, October 14, 1890. Present : The Chief-Justice and all of the Associate Justices, except Mr. Justice Field. The Chief-Justice said It is with feelings of profound sadness that I announce the death of tlie senior Associate Justice of this Court, Mr. Justice Miller, which occurred at his residence in this city, at fifty-two minutes past ten o'clock, last even- ing. No business will be transacted, and the Court, as a mark of respect to the memory of its eminent associate, will adjourn until Monday next.'' Adjourned until Monday, October 20th, at twelve o'clock. 11038- 2 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Monday, October 20, 1890. Present : Mr. Justice Field, Mr. Justice Bradley, Mr. Justice Gray^ Mr. Justice Blatchford, and Mr. Justice Lamar. Mr. J ustice Field said : The Justices of this Court who accompanied the body of Mr. Justice Miller to its place of burial, in Iowa, have not returned to Washington. There is therefore not a quorum of Justices present to-day, and the Court will consequently stand adjourned until to-morrow at 12 o'clock. Adjourned until to-morrow at 12 o'clock. 11038 3 ; 2 No. 3.—D. Herbert Hostetter, admr., &c., appt. vs. R. C. Gray et al. Appearance of parties under order of publication, filed and entered on mo- tion of Mr. F. H. Mackey in behalf of counsel. No. 1301.—The U. S. ex rel. Amaza A. Redfield, plff. in error, vs. Wm. Windom, sec't^, &c. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. F. H. Mackey in support of motion. No. 1 174.—Dick Duncan, appt., vs. T. P. McCall, sheriff, &c. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. H. J. May in support of motion. No. 1210. —The Texas & Pacific Ry. Co., plff. in error, vs. the Southern Pacific Company. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted by Mr. H. J. Levey in support of motions and by Mr. D. W. Howe and Mr. Jno. F. Dillon in opposition thereto. No. 34.—Max Rosenthal, appt., vs. Kersey Coates, as assignee, &c. Death of appellee suggested and order of publication granted on motion of Mr. John Johns, in behalf of counsel. No. 808.—R. B. Hooper, plff. in error, vs. The People of the State of California. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. A. B. Browne in sup- port of motion. No. 837.—The Atlantic & Pacific R. R. Co., appt., vs. J. T. Lesueur, treas'r, &c. Appeal from the supreme court of the Territory of Arizona dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. A. B. Browne for appellant. No. 1195.—The U. S., ex. rel. R. Mason Lisle, pFff in error, vs. Jno. R. Lynch, 4th Auditor. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. W. V. R. Berry in behalf of counsel. No. 1356.—F. H. Ayers et al., pFffs in error, vs. A. E. Watson. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. Wm. E. Earle in support of motion. No. 988.—Joseph N. Haddock, pFff in error, vs. Wm. M. Wright et al., in error to the supreme court of the State of Florida. Dismissed with costs and mandate granted on motion of Mr. James Lowndes for the plaintiff in error. No. 1383.—Daniel G. Ambler et al., pFffs in error,^^??rfsaac Eppinger. Advanced pursuant to the 32d rule on motion of Mr. James Lowndes for the plaintiffs in error. No. 589.—C. S. Sweetland, trustee, app't, vs. Samuel Blatchford, surv'g exe'r, etc., on appeal from the supreme court of the District of Columbia. Dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. M. F. Morris for the appellant. No. 1103.—David J. Hennessey, app^t vs. George V. Bacon et al., sub- mitted by order of court by Mr. M. F. Morris for appellant and by Mr. E. G. Rogers for appellees. 3 No. 37.—Samuel G. Hickman, pVW in error, vs. The City of Fort Scott. Passed for settlement on motion of Mr. Wm. A. McKenney, of counsel for defendant in error. Nos. 50, 51 and 52.—John N. A. Griswold, appt. vs. Rowland G. Hazard et al. No. 53.—John N. A. Griswold, jolff. in error, vs. Rowland G. Hazard et al. Passed pursuant to 26th rule on motion of Mr. Wm. A . McKenney, in behalf of counsel. No. 300.—George L. Thayer, trustee, plff. in error, vs. Peter Butler, recr., etc. No. 301.—Peter Butler, recr., etc., plff. in error, vs. Mary J. Eaton. Motion to advance to be heard with No. 239 as one case, submitted by Mr. Wm. A. McKenney, in behalf of counsel. No. 580.—Byron M. Smith, appt., vs. Artemas Gale et al. Appearance of parties under order of publication filed and entered, on motion of Mr. Wm. A. McKenney, iu behalf of counsel. No. 1237.—Clifton Holden, appt., vs. The State of Minnesota. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. Wm. A. McKenney, in behalf of counsel. No. 1213.—The Dable Grain Shovel Co., plff. in error, vs. Flint, Odell <fe Co. Submitted pursuant to 20th rule, by Mr. Wm. Zimmerman, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Thos. A. Banning and Mr. Ephraim Banning, for defendants in error. No. 999.—F. B. York, pl'ff in error, vs. The State of Texas ; submitted pursuant to the 20th rule by Mr. Rufus H. Thayer for the plaintiff in error and by Mr. Jas. S. Hogg for the def ^t iu error. No. 5. —Hezekiah Bradford, pFff in error, vs. Harriet C. Miller et al., adm'x, etc., in error to the supreme court of the District of Columbia. Dismissed with costs pursuant to the 10th rule. No. 8. —Jesse Spalding, coll'r, etc., pPff in error, vs. George F. Stodder et al. Passed on motion of Mr. Solicitor-General Taft for plaintiff in error. No. 18.—Joseph Nethercleft et al., pl'ffs in error, vs. Wm. H. Robertson, colPr, etc. Passed on motion of Mr. Solicitor-General Taft for the de- fendant in error. No. 10. —The Washington Market Co., appt, vs. The District of Colum- bia. Submitted by Mr. A. A. Birney for appellant and by Mr. I. C. Hazelton and Mr. S. T. Thomas for defendant in error. No. 17. —Johann B. Hoff, appt, vs. Tarrant & Company. Death of appellant suggested and case passed on motion of Mr. Wm. A. McKenney in behalf of counsel. 7 4 Xo. 28.—Wm. Ferguson, et al., app'ts, vs. George G. Dent, et al. ; Ap- peal from the C. C. U. S. for the western district of Tenn. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the 19th rule. No. 3.—D. Herbert Hostetter, adm'r, etc., app't, m. R. C. Gray, d al, ; argued by Mr. A. H. Clarke, for the appellant, and submitted by Mr. James H. Reed, for the appellees. No. 11.—La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance Concentre pl'ff in error, vs. L'Incendie, John C. Hall ; argued by Mr. Charles B. Alexander, of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and submitted by Mr. Given Campbell, for the defendant in error. No. 19.—Abraham Shenfield, appt., vs. The Nashawannuck Mfg.