DOCSLIB.ORG

Noah Haynes Swayne

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne (December 7, 1804 – June 8, 1884) was an Noah Haynes Swayne American jurist and politician. He was the first Republican appointed as a justice to the United States Supreme Court. Contents Birth and early life Supreme Court service Retirement, death and legacy See also Notes References Further reading Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States In office Birth and early life January 24, 1862 – January 24, 1881 Nominated by Abraham Lincoln Swayne was born in Frederick County, Virginia in the uppermost reaches of the Shenandoah Valley, approximately 100 miles (160 km) Preceded by John McLean northwest of Washington D.C. He was the youngest of nine children of Succeeded by Stanley Matthews [1] Joshua Swayne and Rebecca (Smith) Swayne. He was a descendant Personal details of Francis Swayne, who emigrated from England in 1710 and settled Born December 7, 1804 near Philadelphia.[2] After his father died in 1809, Noah was educated Frederick County, Virginia, U.S. locally until enrolling in Jacob Mendendhall's Academy in Waterford, Died June 8, 1884 (aged 79) Virginia, a respected Quaker school 1817-18. He began to study New York City, New York, U.S. medicine in Alexandria, Virginia, but abandoned this pursuit after his teacher Dr. George Thornton died in 1819. Despite his family having Political party Democratic (Before 1856) no money to support his continued education, he read law under John Republican (1856–1890) Scott and Francis Brooks in Warrenton, Virginia, and was admitted to Spouse(s) Sarah Swayne the Virginia Bar in 1823.[3] A devout Quaker (and to date the only Quaker to serve on the Supreme Court), Swayne was deeply opposed to slavery, and in 1824 he left Virginia for the free state of Ohio. His abolitionist sentiments caused him to move to Ohio.[4] He began a private practice in Coshocton and, in 1825, was elected Coshocton County Attorney. Four years later he was elected to the Ohio state legislature. In 1830 he was appointed U.S. Attorney for Ohio by Andrew Jackson, and moved to Columbus to take up the new position. While serving as U.S. Attorney, Swayne was elected in 1834 to the Columbus City Council, and in 1836 to the Ohio House of Representatives. As U.S. Attorney, Swayne became close friends with Supreme Court justice John McLean. McLean, by the end of his career, was a strong Republican, and when the party was formed in 1855 Swayne had become an early member and political organizer. In 1835, as escalating tensions in the boundary dispute between Ohio and Michigan Territory (the Toledo War) threatened to erupt into violent conflict, Ohio Governor Robert Lucas dispatched Swayne, along with former Congressman William Allen and David T. Disney, to Washington D.C. to confer with President Andrew Jackson. The delegation presented Ohio's case and urged the President to act swiftly to address the situation.[5] [6] [7] Supreme Court service John McLean was one of two dissenters in the Dred Scott case. He sought the Republican nomination for President in 1860, losing to Abraham Lincoln. However, he recommended to Lincoln on a number of occasions that Swayne be nominated to replace him on the court. This proved timely; McLean died shortly after Lincoln's inauguration, in April 1861. As the American Civil War began, Swayne campaigned for the vacant seat, lobbying several Ohio members of Congress for their support. As the Supreme Court media itself notes: "Swayne satisfied Lincoln's criteria for appointment: commitment to the Union, slavery opponent, geographically correct."[8] It is also believed that Swayne had also represented fugitive slaves in court. So eight months after McLean's death, Swayne was nominated, on January 21, 1862.[9] The nomination was confirmed by the United States Senate on January 24, 1862, with Swayne receiving his commission the same day.[10] In the Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873) -- a pivotal decision on the meaning of Section 1 of the relatively new Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution—Swayne dissented with Justices Stephen J. Field and Joseph Bradley. Field's dissent was important, and presaged later decisions broadening the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment. However, four years later Swayne joined the majority in Munn v. Illinois, with Field still dissenting.[9] Swayne's potential judicial greatness failed to materialize. He was the first of President Lincoln's five appointments to the Supreme Court: Noah Hayes Swayne – 1862;Samuel Freeman Miller – 1862; David Davis – 1862; Stephen Johnson Field – 1863; and Salmon P. Chase – Chief Justice – 1864. He is also said to have been "the weakest".[11] [12] His main distinction was his staunch judicial support of the president's war measures: the Union blockade (Prize Cases, 67 U.S. 635 (1862)); issuance of paper money (i.e., greenbacks); and support for the presidential prerogative to declaremartial law (Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)).[13] He is most famous for his majority opinion in Springer v. United States, 102 U.S. 586 (1881), which upheld the Federal income tax imposed under the Revenue Act of 1864.[14] In Gelpcke v. Dubuque 68 U.S. 175 (1864) Swayne wrote the majority opinion, repudiating a claim that the Iowa constitution could impair legal obligations to bondholders. When contracts are made on the basis of trust in past judicial decisions those contracts could not be impaired by any subsequent construction of the law. "We shall never immolate truth, justice, and the law, because a state tribunal has erected the altar and decreed the sacrifice." He strongly supported "the contractual rights of railroad bond holders, "even in the face of repudiation sanctioned both by the Iowa state legislature and state supreme court. Obligations sacred to law are not to be destroyed simply because 'a state tribunal has erected the altar and decreed the sacrifice.'"[13] [15] For a later decision on impairment of contracts, compare Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905). Swayne remained on the court until 1881, twice lobbying unsuccessfully to be elevated to the position of Chief Justice (after the death of Roger Taney in 1864 and Salmon Chase in 1873).[9] After his retirement, Swayne returned to Ohio. Retirement, death and legacy Swayne is not regarded as a particularly distinguished justice. He wrote few opinions, usually signing on to opinions written by others, and remained on the court well past his physical prime, being quite infirm at his retirement. Under pressure from President Rutherford B. Hayes, he finally agreed to retire on the condition that his friend and fellow Ohio attorney Stanley Matthews replace him.[13] His son, Wager Swayne, served in the American Civil War, rose to the rank of Major General, served as the military governor of Alabama after the Civil War, and subsequently founded law firms in Toledo, Ohio and New York City. Wager's son, named Noah Hayes Swayne after his grandfather, was president of Burns Brothers, the largest coal distributor in the U.S. when he retired in September 1932. Another of Wager's sons, Alfred Harris Swayne, was vice president of General Motors Corporation.[16] Another of Justice Swayne's sons, Noah Swayne, was a lawyer in Toledo and donated the land for Swayne Field, the former field for the Toledo Mud Hens baseball team.[17] Justice Swayne's remains were buried at the Oak Hill Cemetery in Washington, D.C.[18] The Georgetown graveyard overlooks Rock Creek, and is shared with: Chief Justice Edward Douglass White; and "almost-Justice" Edwin M. Stanton (President Ulysses S. Grant's nomination of him was confirmed by the Senate, but Stanton died before he could be sworn in). Also, Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase was buried there, but his body was transferred after 14 years toCincinnati, Ohio's Spring Grove Cemetery.[18][19] A collection of Swayne's legal papers, pre-dating his service as a Justice, is housed at the Ohio Historical Society, and correspondence with him is also located at other repositories.[20] See also Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United United States Supreme Court cases during the Chase States Court List of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United United States Supreme Court cases during the aneyT States Court List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United United States Supreme Court cases during the Waite States Court List of United States Chief Justices by time in office Wager Swayne List of U.S. Supreme Court Justices by time in office Notes Some data drawn in part from theNoah Haynes Swayne at Supreme Court Historical Society and Oyez Official Supreme Court media, Noah Haynes Swayne. References 1. Stephenson, Donald Grier, Jr. (2003). The Waite Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy (https://books.google.com/?id =f-59Mj6m0dMC&printsec=frontcover). ABC-CLIO. pp. 63–69. ISBN 1-57607-829-9. 2. Johnson, Rossiter; John Howard Brown (1904).The Twentieth Century Biographical Dictionary of Notable Americans (https://books.google.com/?id=Ou4UAAAAYAAJ&printsec=titlepage). 10. Boston: The Biographical Society. pp. s.v. Swain. OCLC 16845677 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/16845677). 3. Stephenson, p. 65 4. Noah H. Swayne (http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/entry.php?rec=364) at Ohio History Central 5. "American Law Encyclopedia, Vol. 9, Noah Hayes Swayne" (http://law.jrank.org/pages/10653/Swayne-Noah-Haynes. html). 6. Way, Willard V. (2005) [1869]. "The Toledo War" (http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moa;cc=moa; rgn=full%20text;idno=AFK4249.0001.001;didno=AFK4249.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000033). The facts and historical events of the Toledo war of 1835 (http://name.umdl.umich.edu/AFK4249.0001.001).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Date & Origin of County Names
    Bulletin 2018-6 June 11, 2018 COUNTY HISTORICAL DATA Date and Origin of County Names County Date Named Origin of Name Named for President John Adams, during whose administration the Adams 1797 county was organized. Allen 1820 Named for Ethan Allen, Revolutionary War hero. Ashland 1846 Named for “Ashland,” home of Henry Clay, near Lexington, KY. Named for the Ashtabula River, and Indian word meaning “fish Ashtabula 1805 river.” Sit of the first institution of higher learning in the Northwest Territory Athens 1808 founded by Federal Land Grant and named for Athens, Greece. Named for the Auglaize River, and Indian word meaning “fallen Auglaize 1848 timbers.” Come from the French words “Belle Monte,” meaning beautiful Belmont 1801 mountain, descriptive of the high, rugged hills. Named for General Jacob Brown, who defeated the British in the Brown 1818 Battle of Lundy’s Lane. Named in honor of General Richard Butler, who was killed when Butler 1803 forces led by General St. Clair were massacred by Indians. Named for Charles Carroll, last surviving signer of the Declaration Carroll 1833 of Independence. Comes from the French word meaning “a plain,” because of the Champaign 1805 character of its surface. Named for General George Roberts Clark, who defeated the Clark 1818 Indians near Springfield, the county seat. Clermont 1800 Comes from the French works meaning “clear mountain”. Named for George Clinton, Vice President of the United States Clinton 1810 when it was organized. County Date Named Origin of Name Columbiana 1803 A fanciful named derived from the names of Columbus and Anna. Coshocton 1810 Indian word meaning “black bear town.” Named in honor of Colonel William Crawford, burned at the stake Crawford 1820 by the Indians nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supremes on Religion: How Do the Justicesâ•Ž Religious Beliefs
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 2010 The uprS emes on Religion: How Do the Justices’ Religious Beliefs Influence their Legal Opinions? Leah R. Glasofer Seton Hall Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Glasofer, Leah R., "The uS premes on Religion: How Do the Justices’ Religious Beliefs Influence their Legal Opinions?" (2010). Law School Student Scholarship. 40. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/40 Leah R. Glasofer Law and Sexuality AWR Final Draft May 2, 2010 The Supremes on Religion: How Do the Justices’ Religious Beliefs Influence their Legal Opinions? This discussion is essentially an inquiry into the effect which religious beliefs have on the jurisprudence of the highest court of the land, the United States Supreme Court. With regard to actually creating laws, the Supreme Court wields an incredible amount of influence over the judiciary by way of precedent in federal courts, and persuasive authority in state courts. However, decisions by the most famed court in the country also mold and form the political and social climate of eras. Supreme Court decisions have defined our nation’s history, for example in US v. Nixon1 or Roe v. Wade.2 Thus, it seems worthwhile to explore the considerations taken into account by the Justices when they craft opinions which will inevitably shape the course of our national and personal histories. It is true that the religious beliefs of the people of the United States and their elected officials also play a leading role in the creation of laws which affect our lives; and people are entitled to be governed and live by the rules which they chose for society.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE JEFFREY B. MORRIS 234 Forest Road Touro College Little Neck, NY 11363 Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (718) 428-3507 225 Eastview Drive e-mail: [email protected] Central Islip, NY 11722 (631) 761-7135 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. in Political Science, Columbia University 1972 J.D., School of Law, Columbia University 1965 B.A., Princeton University 1962 PROFESSIONAL TEACHING EXPERIENCE Professor of Law Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center 1995-Present Associate Professor of Law, 1990-95 Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center Visiting Associate Professor of Law, 1988-90 Brooklyn Law School Assistant Professor of Political Science, 1981-88 University of Pennsylvania Department of Political Science, 1968-74 The City College of the City University of New York (Lecturer, 1968-70; Instructor, 1970-72; Assistant Professor, 1972-74) Lecturer in Law, Baruch College, Summer 1967 City University of New York COURSES TAUGHT ABROAD, TOURO SUMMER PROGRAMS Israel Program – Comparative „Church-State‟ Law 2011 Germany Program – Comparative Constitutional Law 2004, 2005 India Program – Comparative Supreme Courts: U.S. and India 1999 ADJUNCT TEACHING Brooklyn Law School 2002 Honors College, Adelphi University 2004 HONORS Christian R. and Mary F. Lindback Award for Distinguished 1986 Teaching [for “teaching that is intellectually demanding, unusually coherent, and permanent in its effect”] at the University of Pennsylvania Selected as one of three Judicial Fellows in the United States 1976-77 JUDICIAL COMMITTEES AND CONFERENCES Member, Second Circuit Committee on Historical and 1995-2000 Commemorative Events Member, Judicial Conference of the District of Columbia Circuit 1990-92 ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Research Associate to the Administrative Assistant 1976-81 to the Chief Justice of the United States Research and analysis for the Chief Justice of the United States, Warren E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 28 Number 2 Symposium on Civility and Judicial Ethics in the 1990s: Professionalism in the pp.583-646 Practice of Law Symposium on Civility and Judicial Ethics in the 1990s: Professionalism in the Practice of Law The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility Edward McGlynn Gaffney Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Edward McGlynn Gaffney Jr., The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility, 28 Val. U. L. Rev. 583 (1994). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol28/iss2/5 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gaffney: The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility THE IMPORTANCE OF DISSENT AND THE IMPERATIVE OF JUDICIAL CIVILITY EDWARD McGLYNN GAFFNEY, JR.* A dissent in a court of last resort is an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day, when a later decision may possibly correct the errorinto which the dissentingjudge believes the court to have been betrayed... Independence does not mean cantankerousness and ajudge may be a strongjudge without being an impossibleperson. Nothing is more distressing on any bench than the exhibition of a captious, impatient, querulous spirit.' Charles Evans Hughes I. INTRODUCTION Charles Evans Hughes served as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from 1910 to 1916 and as Chief Justice of the United States from 1930 to 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • The Free State of Winston"
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2019 Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston" Susan Neelly Deily-Swearingen University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Deily-Swearingen, Susan Neelly, "Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston"" (2019). Doctoral Dissertations. 2444. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2444 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REBEL REBELS: RACE, RESISTANCE, AND REMEMBRANCE IN THE FREE STATE OF WINSTON BY SUSAN NEELLY DEILY-SWEARINGEN B.A., Brandeis University M.A., Brown University M.A., University of New Hampshire DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History May 2019 This dissertation has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in History by: Dissertation Director, J. William Harris, Professor of History Jason Sokol, Professor of History Cynthia Van Zandt, Associate Professor of History and History Graduate Program Director Gregory McMahon, Professor of Classics Victoria E. Bynum, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History, Texas State University, San Marcos On April 18, 2019 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Books & Special Collections Tarlton Law Library University Of
    Rare Books & Special Collections Tarlton Law Library University of Texas at Austin 727 E. 26th St., Austin, Texas 78705-3224 512/471-7263 SUPREME COURT NOMINATIONS RESEARCH FILES, 1823-1955, Bulk 1860-1939 Inventory Date printed: SUPREME COURT NOMINATIONS RESEARCH FILES Inventory Extent: 1.25 linear ft. (3 boxes). Frank, John P., 1917-2002- John P. Frank, a noted attorney and constitutional scholar, was born in 1917. He received his LL.B. at the University of Wisconsin, and his J.S.D. from Yale University. He was law clerk to Justice Hugo L. Black at the October, 1942 term, among other prominent positions. He taught law from 1946 to 1954 at Indiana and Yale Universities. He has authored 12 books on the Supreme Court, the Constitution and constitutional law. A senior partner with the Phoenix firm of Lewis and Roca, which he joined in 1954, Frank was lead counsel on the ground-breaking Miranda v. Arizona case, and served as counsel to Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. While serving on the Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure, Frank led a group that worked on drafting revisions to Rule 11 attorney sanctions. Frank also served from 1960 to 1970 on the Advisory Committee of Civil Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Scope and Content: The collection consists of research into U.S. Supreme Court nominations of the 19th and 20th centuries, and includes 8 inches of printed materials and 7 microfilm reels (35mm), 1823-1939 (bulk 1860-1939), collected by Frank, for a research project concerning Supreme Court nominations.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • February Speaker
    ______________________________________________________________________________ CCWRT February, 2016 Issue Meeting Date: February 18, 2016 Place: The Drake Center (6:00) Sign-in and Social (6:30) Dinner (7:15) Business Meeting (7:30) Speaker Dinner Menu: Baked Stuffed Fish, Wild Rice, Ratatouille, Waldorf Salad, Rye Dinner Roll, and Carrot Cake Vegetarian Option: Upon request Speaker: Gene Schmiel, Washington D.C. Topic: Citizen-General: Jacob D. Cox ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reservations: If you do not have an Automatic Reservation, please remember to email your meeting reservation to [email protected] or call it in to Lester Burgin at 513-891-0610. If you are making a reservation for more than yourself, please provide the names of the others. Please note that all reservations must be in no later than 8:00 pm Tuesday, February 9, 2016. _______________________________________________________________________________________ February Speaker: In the 19th century there were few professional schools other than West Point, and so the self-made man was the standard for success. True to that mode, Jacob Dolson Cox, a long-time Cincinnati resident who is buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, fashioned himself into a Renaissance man. In each of his vocations and avocations— Civil War general, Governor of Ohio, Secretary of the Interior, President of the University of Cincinnati, Dean of the Cincinnati Law School, President of the Wabash Railroad, historian, and scientist— he was recognized as a leader. Cox’s greatest fame, however, is as the foremost participant-historian of the Civil War. His accounts of the conflict are to this day cited by serious scholars and serve as a foundation for the interpretation of many aspects of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court, Segregation Legislation, and the African American Press, 1877-1920
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2007 Slipping Backwards: The Supreme Court, Segregation Legislation, and the African American Press, 1877-1920 Kathryn St.Clair Ellis University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ellis, Kathryn St.Clair, "Slipping Backwards: The Supreme Court, Segregation Legislation, and the African American Press, 1877-1920. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/160 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kathryn St.Clair Ellis entitled "Slipping Backwards: The Supreme Court, Segregation Legislation, and the African American Press, 1877-1920." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. W. Bruce Wheeler, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Ernest Freeberg, Stephen V. Ash,
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 46, folder “4/3/76 - Alabama” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 46 of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library I THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON THE PRESIDENT'S BRIEFING BOOK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ************************* ALABAMA MAY 3, 1976 ************************* ALABAMA State Profile Alabama is called the "Yellowhanuner state because of its state bird, the "Cotton state" because of its chief agricultural product and the "Heart of Dixie" because of its location. The total area of Alabama is 51,609 square miles, of which 549 square miles are inland water surface. It is the 29th state of the union is size. The state capital is Montgomery and the state entered the union on December 14, 1819, as the 22nd state. The southern pine has been adopted as the state's official tree and the camellia as the official flower.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewing an Exhibition
    Winter 1983 Annual Report 1983 Annual Report 1983 Report of the President Much important material has been added to our library and the many patrons who come to use our collections have grown to the point where space has become John Diehl quite critical. However, collecting, preserving and dissemi- President nating Cincinnati-area history is the very reason for our existence and we're working hard to provide the space needed Nineteen Eight-three has been another banner to function adequately and efficiently. The Board of Trustees year for the Cincinnati Historical Society. The well docu- published a Statement of the Society's Facility Needs in December, mented staff reports on all aspects of our activities, on the to which you responded very helpfully with comments and pages that follow clearly indicate the progress we have made. ideas. I'd like to have been able to reply personally to each Our membership has shown a substantial increase over last of you who wrote, but rest assured that all of your comments year. In addition to the longer roster, there has been a are most welcome and carefully considered. Exciting things heartening up-grading of membership category across-the- are evolving in this area. We'll keep you posted as they board. Our frequent and varied activities throughout the develop. year attracted enthusiastic participation. Our newly designed The steady growth and good health of the quarterly, Queen City Heritage, has been very well received.Society rest on the firm foundation of a dedicated Board We are a much more visible, much more useful factor in of Trustees, a very competent staff and a wonderfully the life of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Abington School District V. Schempp 1 Ableman V. Booth 1 Abortion 2
    TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Bill of Rights 66 Birth Control and Contraception 71 Abington School District v. Schempp 1 Hugo L. Black 73 Ableman v. Booth 1 Harry A. Blackmun 75 Abortion 2 John Blair, Jr. 77 Adamson v. California 8 Samuel Blatchford 78 Adarand Constructors v. Peña 8 Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell 79 Adkins v. Children’s Hospital 10 Bob Jones University v. United States 80 Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl 13 Boerne v. Flores 81 Advisory Opinions 15 Bolling v. Sharpe 81 Affirmative Action 15 Bond v. United States 82 Afroyim v. Rusk 21 Boumediene v. Bush 83 Age Discrimination 22 Bowers v. Hardwick 84 Samuel A. Alito, Jr. 24 Boyd v. United States 86 Allgeyer v. Louisiana 26 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale 86 Americans with Disabilities Act 27 Joseph P. Bradley 87 Antitrust Law 29 Bradwell v. Illinois 89 Appellate Jurisdiction 33 Louis D. Brandeis 90 Argersinger v. Hamlin 36 Brandenburg v. Ohio 92 Arizona v. United States 36 William J. Brennan, Jr. 92 Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing David J. Brewer 96 Development Corporation 37 Stephen G. Breyer 97 Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 38 Briefs 99 Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority 38 Bronson v. Kinzie 101 Assembly and Association, Freedom of 39 Henry B. Brown 101 Arizona v. Gant 42 Brown v. Board of Education 102 Atkins v. Virginia 43 Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association 104 Automobile Searches 45 Brown v. Maryland 106 Brown v. Mississippi 106 Bad Tendency Test 46 Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company 107 Bail 47 Buchanan v.
    [Show full text]