Pravahini Monthly Compendium December 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Starting Grid
Doc 35 Time 21:20 FORMULA 1 ETIHAD AIRWAYS ABU DHABI GRAND PRIX 2020 - Yas Island Provisional Starting Grid 1 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 1:35.246 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 1:35.271 Aston Martin Red Bull Racing 2 Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team 3 44 Lewis HAMILTON 1:35.332 4 Lando NORRIS 1:35.497 Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team 4 McLaren F1 Team 5 23 Alexander ALBON 1:35.571 55 Carlos SAINZ 1:35.815 Aston Martin Red Bull Racing 6 McLaren F1 Team 7 26 Daniil KVYAT 1:35.963 18 Lance STROLL 1:36.046 Scuderia AlphaTauri Honda 8 BWT Racing Point F1 Team 9 10 Pierre GASLY 1:36.242 31 Esteban OCON 1:36.359 Scuderia AlphaTauri Honda 10 Renault DP World F1 Team 11 3 Daniel RICCIARDO 1:36.406 16 Charles LECLERC * 1:36.065 Renault DP World F1 Team 12 Scuderia Ferrari 13 5 Sebastian VETTEL 1:36.631 99 Antonio GIOVINAZZI 1:38.248 Scuderia Ferrari 14 Alfa Romeo Racing ORLEN 15 7 Kimi RAIKKONEN 1:37.555 63 George RUSSELL 1:38.045 Alfa Romeo Racing ORLEN 16 Williams Racing 17 51 Pietro FITTIPALDI 1:38.173 6 Nicholas LATIFI 1:38.443 Haas F1 Team 18 Williams Racing 19 11 Sergio PEREZ * 20 Kevin MAGNUSSEN * 1:37.863 BWT Racing Point F1 Team 20 Haas F1 Team * PENALTIES Car 16 - 3 place grid penalty - Causing a collision - Stewards' document no. 37 (2020 Sakhir Grand Prix) Cars 20 & 11 - Required to start from the back of the starting grid - Additional power unit elements have been used - Stewards' document nos. -
THE HINDU EDITORIAL on a VARANASI COURT ORDERING an ASI SURVEY in GYANVAPI MOSQUE Relevant For: Null | Topic: Indian Architecture Incl
Source : www.thehindu.com Date : 2021-04-10 A DISTURBING ORDER: THE HINDU EDITORIAL ON A VARANASI COURT ORDERING AN ASI SURVEY IN GYANVAPI MOSQUE Relevant for: null | Topic: Indian Architecture incl. Art & Craft & Paintings The order of a civil court in Varanasi that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) should conduct a survey to ascertain whether the Gyanvapi mosque was built over a demolished Hindu temple is an unconscionable intervention that will open the floodgates for another protracted religious dispute. The order, apparently in gross violation of the explicit legislative prohibition on any litigation over the status of places of worship, is likely to give a fillip to majoritarian and revanchist forces that earlier carried on the Ram Janmabhoomi movement over a site in Ayodhya. That dispute culminated in the country’s highest court handing over the site to the very forces that conspired to illegally demolish the Babri Masjid. The plaintiffs, who have filed a suit as representatives of Hindu faith to reclaim the land on which the mosque stands, have now succeeded in getting the court to commission an ASI survey to look for the sort of evidence that they would never have been able to adduce on their own. The order has been issued despite the fact that the Allahabad High Court reserved its order on the maintainability of the suit on March 15 and is yet to pronounce its ruling. It is not clear why the civil judge did not wait for the ruling and went ahead with his directive to the ASI. By an order in 1997, the civil court had decided that the suit was not barred by the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which said all pending suits concerning the status of places of worship will abate and that none can be instituted. -
Current Affairs (MCQ)
December Current Affairs (MCQ) No. of Question -100 1. Which word is named as the Word of the Year 2020 as 9. Who has been appointed as interim chairperson of per the most searched words on the Cambridge Dictionary National Dairy Development Board (NDDB)? in 2020? (a) Dilip Rath (b) T Nanda Kumar (a) Pandemic (b) Corona (c) Varsha Joshi (d) Renu Devi (c) Vaccine (d)Quarantine 10. Which Organization appointed Sandeep Kataria as the 2. China is going to construct the first downstream dam on CEO (1st Indian to be appointed as the global CEO) of the the lower reaches of the river marking a new phase in organization? China’s hydropower exploitation of the river with (a) Red Chief (b) Parle Agro potential ramifications for India? (c) Bata (d )Patanjali (a) Indus (b) Ganges (c) Brahmaputra (d) Sutlej 11. Who chaired the 19th meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Council of Heads of 3. Which Country has the most FDI (Foreign Direct Government (India’s first Summit-level Meeting held Investment) equity inflows in India during April- under India’s Chairmanship) virtually hosted by India? September 2020 according to DPIIT (Department for (a) Narendra Modi (b) Rajnath Singh Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade)? (c) S Jaishankar (d) M Venkaiah Naidu (a) USA (United States of America) (b) Singapore 12. Which City has been ranked as most polluted city in (c) Mauritius the world as per Air Pollution Data released by United (d) Japan States (US) Air Quality Index? (a) New Delhi, India (b) Lahore, Pakistan 4. -
Sdissfinal 4
Abstract CHATTERJEE, SUDESHNA. Children’s Friendship with Place: An Exploration of Environmental Child Friendliness of Children’s Environments in Cities. (Under the direction of Prof. Robin C. Moore.) The Child Friendly Cities is a concept for making cities friendly for all children especially in UN member countries that have ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child (i.e., all except the United States) through municipal action. This idea is particularly important for improving the quality of life of poor urban children who are most affected by sweeping changes brought about by globalization and rapid urbanization in the developing nations of the global South. However, there is no theoretical understanding of a construct such as environmental child friendliness that could guide planning and design of child friendly environments in cities. Resulting from an integrative review of a large body of interdisciplinary literature, a new six- dimensional construct based on children’s friendship needs, called children’s place friendship, is proposed as underpinning environmental child friendliness from an environment-behavior perspective. The study disaggregates the idea of the child friendly city into numerous interlocking child friendly places that children themselves consider friendly based on their own experiences. These child friendly places support the six dimensions of place friendship in different ways: care and respect for places, meaningful exchange with places, learning and competence through place experience, creating and controlling territories, having secret places, and freedom of expression in places. An in-depth analytic ethnography was conducted in a low-income, high-density, mixed-use neighborhood in New Delhi, India, with children in their middle-childhood to validate and elaborate this conceptual framework. -
Judgment RJB-BM
1 4251 123 3rd Cent. BC 185 124 Pre-Mauryan 184 125 3rd Cent. BC 185 126 3rd Cent. B.C. 176 That there are a large number discrepancies also in the description of these Terracotta finds, which also create doubts upon the bonafides of the A.S.I. Team giving such incorrect descriptions. It is true that when archaeological deposits are disturbed, it is not surprising to find earlier material in later levels. This happens when construction or leveling activities require the bringing in of soil from peripheral areas or the clearing and mixing of older deposits. On the other hand, the reverse is impossible, that is we cannot, in an earlier stratified context, find material of later periods. However, the latter appears to be the case at Ayodhya in the context of terracotta figurines as seen in the tabulation provided on pp. 174-203. We find in numerous cases figurines of later periods in far earlier levels, as is evident from the following Table:- Table of Discrepancies in stratigraphy in relation to terracotta figurines Artefact details Discrepancies S. No. 50 R. No. 1027. Layer 2 below Floor 2 belongs to Part of human figurine. Medieval period. It is impossible Mughal level. G5, for a Medieval period layer to layer 2, below Floor 2 have material from Mughal period which is later S. No. 52 R. No. 393. Layer 5 in E8 is Post Gupta (7th - Animal figurine. Late 10th centuries AD). It is Medieval period. E8, impossible for late medieval layer 5 (Mughal) period material to be found in an earlier period. -
2020 SAKHIR GRAND PRIX 3 - 6 December 2020
2020 SAKHIR GRAND PRIX 3 - 6 December 2020 From The Stewards Document 40 To All Teams, All Officials Date 07 December 2020 Time 00:15 Title Timing Sheet Description Final Race Classification Enclosed SAK DOC 40 - Final Race Classification.pdf Garry Connelly Loic Bacquelaine Mika Salo Mazen Al Hilli The Stewards Doc 40 Time 00:15 FORMULA 1 ROLEX SAKHIR GRAND PRIX 2020 - Sakhir Race Final Classification after 87 Laps - 307.995 km NO DRIVER NAT ENTRANT LAPS TIME GAP INT KM/H FASTEST ON PTS 1 11 Sergio PEREZ BWT Racing Point F1 Team 87 1:31:15.114 202.513 0:56.789 69 25 2 31 Esteban OCON Renault DP World F1 Team 87 1:31:25.632 10.518 10.518 202.124 0:57.350 75 18 3 18 Lance STROLL BWT Racing Point F1 Team 87 1:31:26.983 11.869 1.351 202.074 0:57.388 85 15 4 55 Carlos SAINZ McLaren F1 Team 87 1:31:27.694 12.580 0.711 202.048 0:57.165 80 12 5 3 Daniel RICCIARDO Renault DP World F1 Team 87 1:31:28.444 13.330 0.750 202.021 0:56.979 57 10 6 23 Alexander ALBON Aston Martin Red Bull Racing 87 1:31:28.956 13.842 0.512 202.002 0:57.056 52 8 7 26 Daniil KVYAT Scuderia AlphaTauri Honda 87 1:31:29.648 14.534 0.692 201.976 0:57.001 80 6 8 77 Valtteri BOTTAS Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team 87 1:31:30.503 15.389 0.855 201.945 0:56.563 60 4 9 63 George RUSSELL Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team 87 1:31:33.670 18.556 3.167 201.829 0:55.404 80 3 10 4 Lando NORRIS McLaren F1 Team 87 1:31:34.655 19.541 0.985 201.792 0:57.270 85 1 11 10 Pierre GASLY Scuderia AlphaTauri Honda 87 1:31:35.641 20.527 0.986 201.756 0:57.220 53 12 5 Sebastian VETTEL Scuderia Ferrari 87 1:31:37.725 -
Mosque As Monument: the Afterlives of Jama Masjid
This article was downloaded by: [Hilal Ahmed] On: 23 April 2013, At: 21:27 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK South Asian Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsas20 Mosque as Monument: The Afterlives of Jama Masjid and the Political Memories of a Royal Muslim Past Hilal Ahmed a a Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), New Delhi To cite this article: Hilal Ahmed (2013): Mosque as Monument: The Afterlives of Jama Masjid and the Political Memories of a Royal Muslim Past, South Asian Studies, 29:1, 51-59 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2013.772814 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. -
Mahesh Dattani's Final Solutions Directed by Arvind Gaur at SRC.” Facebook
Wellesley College Wellesley College Digital Scholarship and Archive Honors Thesis Collection 2012 Challenging Religious Communalism With Theatre: Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions Sohini Pillai Wellesley College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.wellesley.edu/thesiscollection Recommended Citation Pillai, Sohini, "Challenging Religious Communalism With Theatre: Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions" (2012). Honors Thesis Collection. 52. https://repository.wellesley.edu/thesiscollection/52 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Wellesley College Digital Scholarship and Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Thesis Collection by an authorized administrator of Wellesley College Digital Scholarship and Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Challenging Religious Communalism With Theatre: Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions Sohini Pillai Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in South Asia Studies April 2012 ©2012 Sohini Pillai. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ii Introduction 1 Chapter One- Drama, Politics & Religion: Theatre and Communalism in South Asia 11 Chapter Two- The Ayodhya Dispute: The Political Context of Final Solutions 22 Chapter Three- The Playwright & The Play: Mahesh Dattani and Final Solutions 30 Chapter Four- Final Solutions: A Textual Analysis 37 Chapter Five- From Bombay to Palo Alto: Final Solutions in Performance 67 Chapter Six- What’s In A Language?: Final Solutions in Hindi-Urdu 81 Chapter Seven- The Right Medium?: Theatre in a Film-Dominated Society 98 Conclusion 107 Appendix: Photographs from Productions of Final Solutions 112 Bibliography 118 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not be possible without the support of a number of people. Firstly, I would not have been able to complete this research without the supervision of my thesis advisor Assistant Professor of South Asia Studies, Neelima Shukla-Bhatt. -
Rules of Communication for Ayodhya Verdict
Rules Of Communication For Ayodhya Verdict When Thomas ropes his churches syphon not credibly enough, is Vladimir brunet? Lactating or stalwart, Ingemar never horseshoeing any stablemate! Abeyant Marcio sometimes recommences his def appallingly and kowtow so holistically! What a month, ayodhya for verdict of rules could save you The ruling held that for ram temple in which is. Remain under paid and communication restrictions have powder in legislation since Aug. Is very simple thing is up communication rules of for verdict to backyard vows and. Kathua and parts of other states. 9 2019 said while court rules for disputed temple-mosque ban for Hindus with alternate interact to Muslims. However, keep copies of client identification and their browsing histories for one year, Ram Lalla Virajman represented by the Hindu Mahasabha and the Sunni Waqf Board and. Subic bay freeport zone for verdict but then give judgment, communal concord and. The ayodhya for us and many indian society, or any such as an epitome of. Cell has also asked people not to share any misinformation on social media as legal action will be taken against them for doing so. Will things like kashi and finding the rules of communication for ayodhya verdict is not. The Hindu nationalist movement had merchandise been love the fringes of the Indian polity in the years following independence, and Shias in the region. Social media platforms, of rules would appear to argue that? Ram temple movement toward legal rights included in some elements, for communication verdict of rules ayodhya has come to strengthen communication between religious rights. -
Temple Desecration in Pre-Modern India
HISTORICAL ANALYSIS Temple desecration in pre-modern India When, where, and why were Hindu temples desecrated in pre-modern history, and how was this connected with the rise of Indo-Muslim states? The historical experience of temple desecration in pre-modern India – and, at a more general level, contested his- tory revolving round Indo-Muslim rulers and states – has become a sensitive mass political issue in contemporary India. The demolition of the Babri Masjid, on December 6, 1992, by storm-troopers of the Sangh Parivar, and the train of communal violence and ‘ill-fare’ this vandalism brought to different regions of the country, propelled the issue to national centre-stage. The ideologues of the Hindu Right have, through a manipulation of pre-modern his- tory and a tendentious use of source material and historical data, built up a dangerously plausible picture of fanati- cism, vandalism and villainy on the part of the Indo-Muslim conquerors and rulers. Part of the ideological and political argument of the Hindu Right is the assertion that for about five centuries from the thirteenth, Indo-Muslim states were driven by a ‘theology of iconoclasm’ – not to mention fanaticism, lust for plunder, and uncompromis- ing hatred of Hindu religion and places of worship. In this illuminating and nuanced essay on temple desecration and Indo-Muslim states, which Frontline offers its readers in two parts, the historian Richard M. Eaton presents important new insights and meticulously substantiated conclusions on what happened or is likely to have happened in pre-modern India. – Editor, Frontline RICHARD M. EATON cited by Hindu nationalists is found in Persian materials trans- lated and published during the British occupation of India. -
PDILD JRW /96 D[HG DOOHJHV %-3 Tahsildar's Driver Too Dies of Severe
\ \ | THE LARGEST CIRCULATED ENGLISH DAILY IN SOUTH INDIA VIJAYAWADA I WEDNESDAY I 6 NOVEMBER 2019 WEATHER O WORLD 10 TABLOID Max: 33 C | SPORTS 16 Min: 23OC | ● RH: 79% &ROXPQLVWVXHV7UXPS 396LQGKXVXIIHUVDQ 3OXVVL]HPRGHOLV Rainfall: Nil IRUGHIDPDWLRQ H[LWDW&KLQD2SHQ 6DE\DÙVODWHVWPXVH Forecast: Generally cloudy sky. Max/Min temp. 33/34ºC deccanchronicle.com, facebook.com/deccannews, twitter.com/deccanchronicle, google.com/+deccanchronicle Vol. 31 No. 156 Established 1938 | 32 PAGES | C6.00 ASTROGUIDE Protectors seek protection in Delhi Vikari; Dakshinayana Tithi: Kartika Shudda Navami till -PDILDJRW/96 7.21 am Star: Satabhisham Varjyam: 2.20 pm to 4.08 pm New Delhi: Durmuhurtam: 11.37 am to 12.22 pm D[HGDOOHJHV%-3 CHAMPIONS LEAGUE Rahukalam: 12 noon to 1.30 pm HIJRI CALENDAR Claims tough stand of former CS against Bayern vs Olympiacos Rabbi-ul-Awwal 8, 1441 AH PRAYERS(SHAHI MASJID) evangelism could have earned him transfer Lokomotiv Moscow vs Juventus Fajar: 5.40 am PATHRI RAJASEKHAR | Zohar: 1.30 pm DC Crvena Zvezda vs Tottenham Asar: 4.30 pm NELLORE, NOV. 5 DESAM CHIEF TO PROTEST Maghrib: 5.44 pm Isha: 8.15 pm The Bharatiya Janata AGAINST SAND POLICY Party state spokesperson Bayer vs Atletico Madrid SUNSET TODAY 5.35 PM K. Anjaneya Reddy MD ILYAS | DC duct deeksha from led by SUNRISE TOMORROW 6.06 AM alleged that the Jerusalem VIJAYAWADA, NOV. 5 Mr Naidu, in which TD MOONSET TOMORROW 1.44 AM mafia — a euphemism for leaders and cadres will MOONRISE TODAY 1.44 PM the alleged communal Telugu Desam supremo participate. Mr Naidu PSG vs Club Brugge slant of Chief Minister Y S N Chandrababu Naidu said that Jana Sena Jagan Mohan Reddy in on Tuesday announced asked for TD support, PILOTS REJECT favour of fellow Christ- his decision to conduct a hence their party had Atalanta vs Man City ians — is behind the sud- deeksha against sand cri- joined the protest. -
2020 SAKHIR GRAND PRIX 3 - 6 December 2020
2020 SAKHIR GRAND PRIX 3 - 6 December 2020 From The Stewards Document 36 To All Teams, All Officials Date 06 December 2020 Time 22:26 Title Race deleted lap times turn 8 Description Race deleted lap times turn 8 Enclosed SAK DOC 36 - Race Deleted Lap Times - Turn 8.pdf Garry Connelly Loic Bacquelaine Mika Salo Mazen Al Hilli The Stewards 2020 SAKHIR GRAND PRIX 3 – 6 December 2020 From The Stewards Document 36 To All Officials, All Teams Date 06 December 2020 Time 22:26 The Stewards, having received reports from the Race Director, have considered the following matters and determine the following: Session Race Fact The cars below did not use the track at turn 8 Decision Car Driver Competitor Offence Lap Time time 1 6 Nicholas Latifi Williams Racing 20:24:19 1:00.554 2 23 Alexander Albon Aston Martin Red Bull Racing 20:26:14 0:59.384 3 89 Jack Aitken Williams Racing 20:29:21 0:59.837 4 63 George Russell Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team 20:37:40 0:57.955 5 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas F1 Team 20:40:15 0:59.922 6 77 Valteri Bottas Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team 20:40:37 0:58.180 7 23 Alexander Albon Aston Martin Red Bull Racing 20:45:54 0:58.826 8 7 Kimi Raikkonen Alfa Romeo Racing ORLEN 20:50:36 0:58.662 9 89 Jack Aitken Williams Racing 20:52:31 0:58.925 10 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas F1 Team 20:56:20 0:58.740 11 23 Alexander Albon Aston Martin Red Bull Racing 21:01:35 1:01.752 12 4 Lando Norris McLaren F1 Team 21:05:46 0:58.517 13 7 Kimi Raikkonen Alfa Romeo Racing ORLEN 21:06:19 0:59.012 14 7 Kimi Raikkonen Alfa Romeo Racing ORLEN 21:08:18 0:58.888 15 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas F1 Team 21:27:39 0:59.631 16 10 Pierre Gasly Scuderia AlphaTauri Honda 21:32:26 0:57.433 17 10 Pierre Gasly Scuderia AlphaTauri Honda 21:40:06 0:57.458 18 26 Daniil Kvyat Scuderia AlphaTauri Honda 21:42:56 0:57.326 Offence Breach of Appendix L, Ch IV, Article 2 and 12.1.1 (i) of the FIA International Sporting Code, failure to follow the Race Director’s Event Notes point 21.