DOCSLIB.ORG

Maribyrnong River Valley Vision and Design Guidelines April 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maribyrnong River Valley Vision and Design Guidelines April 2006 Maribyrnong River Valley Vision and Design Guidelines April 2006 Consultant Report to the Maribyrnong River Valley Project Steering Committee Consultants: IUM – Lester Townsend, Pia Herbert David Mayes Urban Design Project team The Project Steering Committee: City of Maribyrnong Jules Griffith and Robin Dunstone City of Moonee Valley Simon Cotterill/Rebecca Jenkins City of Melbourne Cletus Kweifio-Okai City of Brimbank Michael Mielczarek City of Hume Kim Giaquinta Dept. Sustainability & Environment Sue Hadden (Flora and Fauna) Dept. Sustainability & Environment Rhonda Boyle (Melbourne 2030) Parks Victoria Paul Dartnell Melbourne Water Peter Rankin The project consultant team: IUM – Lester Townsend & Pia Herbert David Mayes Urban Design – David Mayes Key stakeholders consulted: Port of Melbourne Corporation Port Phillip and Westernport VicUrban Catchment Management Authority Heritage Victoria Local and peak interest groups Environment Protection Authority including Friends groups, Victoria Environment Victoria, Green Department of Victorian Wedge Coalition, Bicycle Victoria Communities Recreational and boating clubs Tourism Victoria Commonwealth Dept of Defence Department of Infrastructure Melbourne Airport VicRoads Major developers with an interest in the study area. Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, April 2006 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2006 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. Printed by Documents On Call, Footscray ISBN 1 74152 453 9 For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Page ii SUBMISSIONS ARE NOW WELCOME! This report has been produced for consultation purposes and it should not be assumed that the content necessarily reflects the views of the Minister for Planning, the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), Parks Victoria, Melbourne Water or relevant municipalities. The Maribyrnong River Valley Project Steering Committee is keen to receive submissions addressing any of the following issues: o The extent to which the proposed vision, objectives and strategies reflect previous strategic work including former concept plans, current policies (such as Melbourne 2030 and the draft River Health Strategy) in addition to stakeholder input during the project. o Whether the proposed design objectives and guidelines adequately reflect the vision and broad objectives. o The suggested priorities for strengthening planning controls. o Suggestions as to how the proposed design objectives and guidelines could be translated into planning scheme provisions – including fine-tuning of performance standards, and whether performance criteria should be mandatory or subject to discretion. o Priorities for acquiring open space or negotiating access to the river. o Any of the recommendations. o Suggestions for improved mechanisms for State and local government to work together on issues affecting the Maribyrnong River, in consultation with key stakeholders and the community. Submissions will be collated by DSE and copies provided to the relevant councils, Parks Victoria and Melbourne Water, plus other Government agencies where appropriate. Outcomes of the consultation will be reported back to stakeholders. DSE will continue to work with the councils and agencies to come up with final agreed recommendations and will support implementation, including the preparation of future planning scheme amendments. Submissions should be posted, faxed or emailed by Wednesday 31 May 2006 to: Rhonda Boyle Project Manager, Urban Management Branch Department of Sustainability and Environment Level 9, 8 Nicholson Street East Melbourne 3002 Phone: 9637 9232; Fax: 9637 8108 Email: [email protected] Page ii Page iii Contents Project team....................................................................................................... ii List of maps ....................................................................................................... v List of Guidelines ............................................................................................. vi Definitions........................................................................................................ vii Executive summary.......................................................................................... ix Planning visions for a better river................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 3 1.1 The purpose of this study....................................................................... 3 1.2 Why has this study been undertaken?.................................................... 3 1.3 What is the study area for the guidelines? ............................................. 5 1.4 Study method and outputs...................................................................... 5 1.5 The structure of this report..................................................................... 6 2. Vision and broad objectives........................................................................ 7 2.1 Government policy................................................................................. 7 2.2 Previous studies ..................................................................................... 7 2.3 Community consultation........................................................................ 8 2.4 Vision................................................................................................... 11 3. An overview of the river valley................................................................. 13 4. Understanding the river............................................................................ 17 4.1 Valley physiography ............................................................................ 19 4.2 Flooding............................................................................................... 23 4.3 Open space........................................................................................... 25 4.4 Natural assets ....................................................................................... 29 4.5 Heritage................................................................................................ 31 4.6 Urban settlement .................................................................................. 33 4.7 Urban activity....................................................................................... 35 4.8 Trail network........................................................................................ 39 4.9 Valley access........................................................................................ 41 5. Preferred character ................................................................................... 43 5.1 The potential of the lengths.................................................................. 43 5.2 Preferred character............................................................................... 45 5.3 Developing guidelines to achieve preferred character......................... 46 6. Open space corridor .................................................................................. 47 6.1 Public acquisition of open space.......................................................... 47 6.2 Open space contributions..................................................................... 51 7. Design objectives and guidelines .............................................................. 53 7.1 Open space management – landscape.................................................. 53 7.2 Open space management – access ....................................................... 57 7.3 Landform ............................................................................................. 60 7.4 Urban development interface............................................................... 61 7.5 Site layout and building visibility ........................................................ 63 7.6 Building design .................................................................................... 67 7.7 Infrastructure design ............................................................................ 70 8. Site and precinct plans and capital works............................................... 73 8.1 Where are site and precinct plans needed? .......................................... 73 8.2 Capital works ....................................................................................... 74 Page iv 9. Governance .................................................................................................75 9.1 Coordinated planning............................................................................75 9.2 What planning controls are needed?.....................................................78 Bibliography.....................................................................................................84
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020
    i Rivers Monitoring and Evaluation Plan V1.0 2020 Contents Acknowledgement to Country ................................................................................................ 1 Contributors ........................................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Background and context ........................................................................................................ 3 About the Rivers MEP ............................................................................................................. 7 Part A: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 18 Habitat ................................................................................................................................. 24 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 29 Engaged communities .......................................................................................................... 45 Community places ................................................................................................................ 54 Water for the environment ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maribyrnong River Valley Design Guidelines
    MARIBYRNONG RIVER VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES APRIL 2010 CONTENTS Minister’s foreword 01 Executive summary 02 Acknowledgements 09 1 Introduction 11 1.1 Why these guidelines are needed 13 1.2 Policy context 13 1.3 Overview of the river 14 1.4 Study area 18 2 What we want to achieve 21 2.1 Vision 22 2.2 Preferred river character 23 3 Priorities for action 29 3.1 Enlarge the open space corridor 30 3.2 Improve site and precinct planning 38 3.3 Undertake important capital works 41 3.4 Improve overall governance 44 3.5 Refine planning controls 45 3.6 Enhance community engagement 51 4 Design guidelines 53 4.1 Additional open space 54 4.2 Open space management – landscape 59 4.3 Open space management – access 63 4.4 Landform 66 4.5 Urban development interface 68 4.6 Site layout and building visibility 70 4.7 Building design 76 4.8 Infrastructure design 79 5 Definitions and abbreviations 81 5.1 Definitions 81 5.2 Abbreviations 82 6 Bibliography 83 7 Appendices 84 Appendix A Relevant maps of the Maribyrnong River 84 Appendix B Consultation, views and values 91 Appendix C Broad objectives table 96 Appendix D Possible planning permit conditions 102 Appendix E Planning Schemes zoning map 104 Appendix F Maribyrnong River Valley settlement chronology 105 Appendix G Maribyrnong River – responsibilities of government agencies 108 MINISTER’S FOREWORD Consistent and coordinated planning is essential for protecting the natural and built character of our treasured waterways. The Maribyrnong River is one of Melbourne’s most used and loved assets, with thousands of Melburnians relaxing along the river every day.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARIBYRNONG RIVER UPSTREAM of the DESIGNATED PORT of PORT PHILLIP Waterway Manager - Parks Victoria (Ph: 131 963)
    KEILOR EAST Exclusive Use & Special Purpose Areas for the Purpose of Clause 13. Allan Reserve Rosehill Maribyrnong ROAD Park a) Maribyrnong River- special light provisions N Creek A Recreational Vessel- (i) used for training or competition;ESSENDON and (ii) is not powered but is propelled by using oars or paddles; on the waters of the Maribyrnong River upstream of the Designated Port of Port Phillip to the Canning Street Moonee Monte Carlo Bridge shall exhibit between sunset and sunrise - Reserve (i) a light in accordance with Rule 25 of the MILLEARA Steele Clifton International Rules for Preventing Collisions at Sea, Park SUNSHINE NORTH LOWER MARIBYRNONG 1972; or RIVER LAND (ii) a fixed 180 degree white light located on the bow MILITARY of the vessel and a flashing 180 degree light on the Ponds AVONDALE HEIGHTS stern of the vessel. LOWER MARIBYRNONG RIVER LAND ABERFELDIE MOONEE PONDS CITYLINK See Inset A ROAD CANNING STREET BRIDGE CORDITE ROAD Creek RALEIGH AVENUE MARIBYRNONG STREET MARIBYRNONG ROAD ORMOND ROAD CANNING River Highpoint River Shopping Centre EPSOM Medway Golf Club ROAD Pipemakers Park ASCOT VALE BALLARAT ROAD HAMPSTEAD MAIDSTONE LANGS ROAD Thompson Reserve STREET BALLARAT LOWER MARIBYRNONG RIVER LAND FLEMINGTON AVENUE RACECOURSE ROAD ROAD BRAYBROOK ROAD Flemington FARNSWORTH Racecourse Creek SMITHFIELD KENSINGTON ROAD MACAULAY ROAD ASHLEY WEST FOOTSCRAY J J Holland Park SUNSHINE ROAD Stony FOOTSCRAY DYNON ROAD ROAD STREET DEMPSTER GEELONG TOTTENHAM ROAD Creek STREET SEDDON FOOTSCRAY Ponds KINGSVILLE CITYLINK ROAD ROAD
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle Notes Widths of Off-Road Shared Use Paths
    NO. 21 - JUNe 2010 Cycle Notes Widths of Off-Road Shared Use Paths Welcome to CYCLE NOTES No. 21. The purpose of CYCLE NOTES is to provide information on the design of bicycle facilities for engineers and planners. CYCLE NOTES should be read in conjunction with: Austroads Guides to Traffic Management and Road Design. Australian Standard 1742.9, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 9 Bicycle Facilities. VicRoads Traffic Engineering Manual Volumes 1 and 2. Introduction Passings and Meetings The purpose of this edition of Cycle Notes is to provide When cyclists and pedestrians are using a shared path, guidance on the width of off-road shared use paths. In they will often “meet” other cyclists and pedestrians particular, it relates the widths of paths to the volume of travelling in the opposite direction or “pass” slower cyclists cyclists and pedestrians who use the path. and pedestrians travelling in the same direction. Guidance is also provided on the circumstances under Delayed Passings which consideration should be given to separating cyclists Delayed passings occur when faster cyclists must slow from pedestrians. down to pass other path users travelling in the same direction. This usually occurs when a “passing” happens Shared Use Paths at the same time as a “meeting” and there is insufficient Shared use paths are the most common form of off road room for the faster cyclist to pass the slower path users. path in Australia and are based on cyclists and pedestrians The number of delayed passings that occur along a path is sharing the path (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • 285. La Trobe
    In the matter of the NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT INQUIRY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF LA TROBE UNIVERSITY THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................... 2 FRAMEWORK FOR THE INQUIRY ............................................................................................... 3 The IAC’s Terms of Reference ................................................................................................. 3 The EES Scoping Requirements ............................................................................................... 4 The IAC’s report ....................................................................................................................... 6 EVIDENCE......................................................................................................................................... 6 LA TROBE UNIVERSITY IS A SIGNIFICANT ASSET TO THE REGION ................................. 8 The University is one of the north’s largest employers ............................................................ 8 The University has significant plans to become the University City of the Future .................. 8 Kingsbury Drive is of significance to the University and the region ....................................... 9 THE UNIVERSITY SUPPORTS THE PROJECT .......................................................................... 13 THE PROJECT’S TREATMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT SHOULD BE IMPROVED .......... 14 Planning policy
    [Show full text]
  • Our Asset Management Journey
    Our Asset Management Journey Professor Sujeeva Setunge Deputy Dean, Research and Innovation School of Engineering 1 RMIT Journey in Infrastructure Asset Management • Central Asset Management System (CAMS) for Buildings • CAMS-Drainage • Disaster resilience of bridges, culverts and floodways • CAMS-Bridges • Automated Tree inventory using airborne LiDar and Aerial imagery • Intelligent Asset Management in Community Partnership – A smart cities project • Future cities CRC – New!! 2 CAMS for Buildings CAMS Mobile • Australian Research council grant in partnership with – MAV – City of Glen Eira – City of Kingston – City of greater Dandenong – Mornington Peninsula shire – City of Monash – City of Brimbank • State government grant to develop the cloud hosted platform • City of Melbourne investment to develop practical features such as backlog, scenario analysis, risk profile • RMIT University property services and City of Melbourne – CAMS Mobile inspection app 3 CAMS for Buildings - Features 1. Database management 2. Data exploration 3. Deterioration prediction 4. Budget calculation 5. Backlog estimation 6. Risk management 4 4 RMIT University©2015 CAMS clients Property Services Australia | Vietnam 5 CAMS TECHNOLOGY - Buildings Current Capability Research In Progress Next stage Data Driven Models for Multi-objective . Cross assets CAMS 700 components Decision Making . Augmented Cost and other input Life-Cycle Physical degradation Reality Scenarios Analysis Modelling modelling – improve . Emergency Risk-cost Relationship accuracy manageme
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, 5Th August, 2020 Virtual Meeting Hosted by Zoom
    PO Box 89, Elwood, VIC 3184 incorporation number: A0034315X ABN: 18 683 397 905 Contact: [email protected] MTF website: www.mtf.org.au Minutes – General Meeting Wednesday, 5th August, 2020 Virtual meeting hosted by zoom Chair: Cr Jonathon Marsden 1. Welcome and introduction Cr Marsden opened the meeting, and welcomed members and guests. 2. Attendance and Apologies Present: Ben Rossiter Victoria Walks Melissa Backhouse VicHealth Shelley White VicHealth Cr Tom Melican City of Banyule Kathleen Petras City of Banyule Henry Lee City of Bayside Cr Bruce Lancashire City of Brimbank Jon Liston City of Brimbank Phillip Mallis City of Darebin Cr Jonathon Marsden City of Hobsons Bay Doug Rowland City of Hobsons Bay Alex Reid City of Kingston Cr Anna Chen City of Manningham Daniele Ranieri City of Manningham Thomas Hardie-Cogdon City of Manningham Richard Smithers City of Melbourne Cr Nic Frances-Gilley City of Melbourne Sam Romasko City of Melton Josh Fergeus City of Monash Damir Agic City of Moonee Valley Cr Natalie Abboud City of Moreland Simon Stainsby City of Moreland Claire Davey Mornington Peninsula Shire Council Tim Lecky City of Stonnington Cr Andrew Davenport City of Whitehorse Serman Uluca City of Whitehorse Russell Tricker City of Whittlesea Troy Knowling City of Whittlesea Michael Butler City of whittlesea Melissa Falkenberg City of Wyndham Julian Wearne City of Yarra Cr Jackie Fristacky City of Yarra Oliver Stoltz Chris Lacey Andrew Pringle Alison Wood Elina Lee Rachel Carlisle Department of Transport Raj Ramalingam VicRoads David Stosser MRCagney Greg Day Edunity Jane Waldock MTF Apologies Adam McSwain, City of Bayside Cr Andrea Surace, City of Moonee Valley 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, 1St September 2021 Virtual Meeting – by Zoom Start Time 6.15 Pm
    PO Box 89, Elwood, VIC 3184 incorporation number: A0034315X ABN: 18 683 397 905 Contact: [email protected] MTF website: www.mtf.org.au Agenda –Annual General Meeting Wednesday, 1st September 2021 Virtual meeting – by Zoom Start time 6.15 pm Chair: Councillor Marsden, MTF Chair 1. Welcome / Introduction & Present / Apologies 2. Confirmation of minutes from previous Annual General Meeting, Wednesday 2nd September 2020 3. Annual Report for 2020/21 financial year 4. Treasurer’s report for 2020/21 financial year 5. Resolve on (refer motions): • annual subscription fees for 2022/23 • confirmation of appointment of Executive Officer 2021/22 • confirmation of appointment of Finance Officer 2021/22 • appointment of auditor 2021/22 6. Approval of proposed schedule of meetings for 2021/22 7. Other Business 8. Meeting close Motions for Annual General Meeting Wednesday 1st September 2021 Item 5: Motions for resolution 5.1 Confirmation of annual subscription fees for 2022/23 Note - MTF practice is to approve the subscription for the subsequent year, which allows invoices to be sent early in the financial year. The subscription for the current year 2020/21 was approved at the previous AGM, 2nd September 2020. Motion: That the annual member subscriptions be raised to $2,500 (plus GST) per year for 2022/2023, and the Executive set associate member subscription amounts according to organisation nature and size. Moved: Seconded: 5.2 Appointment of Executive Officer Motion: That Jane Waldock be re-appointed as MTF Executive Officer for 2021/22 Moved: Seconded: 5.3 Appointment of Finance Officer Motion: That Lynn Dean be re-appointed as MTF Finance Officer for 2021/22 Moved: Seconded: 5.4 Appointment of Auditor Motion: That Stan Obliubek be appointed as auditor for 2021/22 Moved: Seconded: Item 6: Schedule of Meetings for 2021/2022 6.1 Approval of proposed schedule of meetings for 2021/22 That the MTF General Meetings be held on the first Wednesday of each month, except for January 2022, when no meeting is to be held.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Metro Region Five Year Plan for Jobs, Services and Infrastructure 2018–2022
    Eastern Metro Region Five Year Plan for Jobs, Services and Infrastructure 2018–2022 Eastern Metro Region © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Printed by (Impact Digital, Brunswick). ISBN 978-1-76077-179-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-76077-180-5 (pdf/online/MS word) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136 186, or email [email protected] (or relevant address), or via the National Relay Service on 133 677, www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au. Office for Suburban Development Aboriginal acknowledgement The Victorian Government proudly acknowledges Victoria’s Aboriginal community and their rich culture and pays respect to their Elders past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety in Focus Food Act Report 2010 Food Safety in Focus Food Act Report 2010 This Report Has Been Developed As Required Under the Food Act 1984 (S
    Food safety in focus Food Act report 2010 Food safety in focus Food Act report 2010 This report has been developed as required under the Food Act 1984 (s. 7(C)). If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format please phone 1300 364 352 using the National Relay Service 13 36 77 if required, or email: [email protected] This document is available as a PDF on the internet at: www.health.vic.gov.au/foodsafety © Copyright, State of Victoria, Department of Health 2012 This publication is copyright, no part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 50 Lonsdale St, Melbourne. Except where otherwise indicated, the images in this publication show models and illustrative settings only, and do not necessarily depict actual services, facilities or recipients of services. March 2012 (1201039) Print managed by Finsbury Green. Printed on sustainable paper. ISSN 2200-1220 (Print) ISSN 2200-1239 (Online) Food safety in focus Food Act report 2010 Contents From the Minister for Health 1 From the Municipal Association of Victoria 2 Highlights for 2010 3 About this report 6 Food safety reform in Victoria 7 Food regulation: a shared responsibility 15 Keeping food-borne illness in check 19 Safer food, better business: Victoria’s food industry 23 Annual review 2010 27 Supporting food safety statewide 43 Workforce: the capacity to change 49 In your municipality 55 The national picture 93 Looking forward 97 Appendices 99
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bird Monitoring Annual Report 2018-2019
    BirdLife Australia BirdLife Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. BirdLife Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; BirdLife Australia Monographs; the BirdLife Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of BirdLife Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact BirdLife Australia 60 Leicester Street, Suite 2-05 Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: (Australia): (03) 9347 0757 Fax: (03) 9347 9323 (Overseas): +613 9347 0757 Fax: +613 9347 9323 E-mail: [email protected] Recommended citation: BirdLife Australia (2020). Melbourne Water Regional Bird Monitoring Project. Annual Report 2018-19. Unpublished report prepared by D.G. Quin, B. Clarke-Wood, C. Purnell, A. Silcocks and K. Herman for Melbourne Water by (BirdLife Australia, Carlton) This report was prepared by BirdLife Australia under contract to Melbourne Water. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been undertaken to ensure that the information presented within is accurate. BirdLife Australia does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]