DOCSLIB.ORG

Food Safety in Focus Food Act Report 2010 Food Safety in Focus Food Act Report 2010 This Report Has Been Developed As Required Under the Food Act 1984 (S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Food Safety in Focus Food Act Report 2010 Food Safety in Focus Food Act Report 2010 This Report Has Been Developed As Required Under the Food Act 1984 (S Food safety in focus Food Act report 2010 Food safety in focus Food Act report 2010 This report has been developed as required under the Food Act 1984 (s. 7(C)). If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format please phone 1300 364 352 using the National Relay Service 13 36 77 if required, or email: [email protected] This document is available as a PDF on the internet at: www.health.vic.gov.au/foodsafety © Copyright, State of Victoria, Department of Health 2012 This publication is copyright, no part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 50 Lonsdale St, Melbourne. Except where otherwise indicated, the images in this publication show models and illustrative settings only, and do not necessarily depict actual services, facilities or recipients of services. March 2012 (1201039) Print managed by Finsbury Green. Printed on sustainable paper. ISSN 2200-1220 (Print) ISSN 2200-1239 (Online) Food safety in focus Food Act report 2010 Contents From the Minister for Health 1 From the Municipal Association of Victoria 2 Highlights for 2010 3 About this report 6 Food safety reform in Victoria 7 Food regulation: a shared responsibility 15 Keeping food-borne illness in check 19 Safer food, better business: Victoria’s food industry 23 Annual review 2010 27 Supporting food safety statewide 43 Workforce: the capacity to change 49 In your municipality 55 The national picture 93 Looking forward 97 Appendices 99 Appendix 1: Data sources, specifications and limitations 100 Appendix 2: Governance 103 Appendix 3: Functions, accountabilities and legislation 105 Appendix 4: Fixed and mobile food premises registrations/notifications 106 by business class, region and municipality, Victoria, as at December 2010 Appendix 5: Fixed and mobile food premises registrations/notifications 108 by business class, region and similar municipality, Victoria, as at December 2010 Appendix 6: Municipalities by number of fixed and mobile food premises 110 registrations/notifications by business class, Victoria, as at December 2010 Appendix 7: Food premises by number and rate per 10,000 persons, Victoria 2010 112 Appendix 8: Offences under the Food Act 1984 which resulted in a conviction, 114 by type of offence, Victoria, July to December 2010 Appendix 9: Number of food premises where Food Act offences have been committed, resulting in a conviction, 117 by municipality and type and number of offences, Victoria, July to December 2010 Appendix 10: Major food safety and related committees 125 Appendix 11: Resources and publications 131 Appendix 12: Websites 133 Appendix 13: Glossary of terms 134 Appendix 14: Acronyms 137 References 138 List of figures Figure 1: Food Act and associated reforms 2010 12 Figure 2: Food Safety and Regulation Unit responsibilities 18 Figure 3: Food-borne and suspected food-borne outbreaks by cause (n = 40), Victoria, 2010 21 Figure 4: History of food regulation in Victoria 26 Figure 5: Typical food premises classifications under the Food Act 1984 30 Figure 6: Food premises registrations and notifications, as at December 2010 31 Figure 7: Food premises by Department of Health region, as at December 2010 31 Figure 8: Numbers of fixed and mobile food premises by municipality, Victoria, as at December 2010 34 Figure 9: Food premises per 10,000 population in Victoria, as at December 2010 35 Figure 10: Examples of food complaints 2010 37 Figure 11: Notifiable microorganisms, Schedule 5, Public Health and Wellbeing Regulations 2009 38 Figure 12: Visits to Department of Health food safety website, January to December 2010 47 Figure 13: Most viewed content on food safety website, January to December 2010 47 List of tables Table 1: Fixed and mobile food premises by business class and region, Victoria, as at December 2010 32 Table 2: Fixed and mobile food premises registrations/notifications by business class, 32 region and similar municipality, Victoria, as at December 2010 Table 3: Food recalls conducted by Department of Health by reason for recall, Victoria, 36 January to December 2010 Table 4: Food complaints and incidents by type, Victoria, January to December 2010 37 Table 5: Convictions for offences under the Food Act by number of food premises at which a conviction 41 was recorded for each offence, and by number and type of offence, Victoria, July to December 2010 Table 6: Number of food premises where Food Act offences have been committed at which a prosecution 42 resulted in a conviction, by municipality and region, Victoria, July to December 2010 Table 7: Participants in dofoodsafely food-handler training program, January to December 2010 51 Table 8: dofoodsafely participants by employment status, January to December 2010 51 Table 9: dofoodsafely users’ first or main language spoken, January to December 2010 51 Food safety in focus Food Act report 2010 From the Minister for Health Victoria has a vibrant food industry which is vitally Community and not-for-profit groups have welcomed the important to Victorians’ health and to our economy. new food premises classification system. Based on the Our state is Australia’s largest food production, lower food safety risks involved in running simple sausage processing and exporting state, and as such our sizzles, cake stalls and similar events, it significantly eases food industry is a major employer and a significant their obligations under the Food Act. contributor to Victoria’s export success. Public confidence in our first-class food regulatory This is a period of exciting challenges in food safety system remains justifiably high. As the new and better and food regulation. The Food Act 1984 recently food regulatory frameworks are bedded down, our focus underwent major amendment. This report focuses in coming years must be on continuing collaboration on the stories behind the changes and our progress between the Department of Health and local government in implementing them. as coregulators, and engaging with the food industry to improve food safety outcomes. Our regulatory system makes use of the best science to protect public health and consumer interests in food safety I commend the inaugural Food Act annual report to all and hygiene. At the same time, it is now better attuned to those with an interest in this important area. the issues facing the food industry – in particular its need to remain competitive in the marketplace, and its desire for a consistent regulatory approach across Victoria. Enhancing food safety and hygiene has obvious direct benefits for Victorians and also for the consumers who The Hon. David Davis, MLC enjoy Victorian food abroad. A strong food regulatory Minister for Health system has additional benefits for Victoria’s position in the global food market. Purchasers of our food exports have confidence that the products they buy have come from a market where a robust food safety regulatory framework is in place. Work to implement the amended Food Act has involved an intensive focus on a number of key areas – these include education for food handlers, enhanced surveillance, monitoring and enforcement, and provision of a sound scientific framework to underpin risk management decisions. During the year, significant progress was made in supporting local governments in their role as the primary food regulators on the ground. New tools, guidance and training have ensured they understand their responsibilities under the amended Act, and are well equipped to discharge them. While it rarely makes the headlines, local governments’ work in monitoring and enforcing the Food Act is the bedrock of our enviable food safety system. 1 From the Municipal Association of Victoria The Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV), as the The MAV thanks councils for their participation in this peak body representing local government in Victoria, endeavour and their willingness to share information. welcomes the partnership with the Department of Health As the reporting system matures, it will become a to implement a statewide system that improves information powerful tool enabling state and local government to and knowledge about food safety regulatory activities make policy decisions underpinned by strong evidence, undertaken by the department and councils. so that their efforts are better focused on the food risks that pose the greatest threat to safety. This in turn will Victoria’s 79 councils have an enduring involvement in strengthen food safety for consumers, and the proud food safety regulation. Hygiene, cleanliness and the reputation of Victoria’s food businesses. availability of safe food for sale have been key priorities for municipal health inspectors for many decades. Over time these responsibilities have been formalised through state legislation, with the resulting statutory requirements now contained in the Food Act 1984. While councils have had direct knowledge of, and worked Rob Spence closely with, food businesses in their municipalities for Chief Executive Officer many years, there has been a gap in understanding problems that cross municipal boundaries which could be mitigated through collaborative effort between councils and with the Department of Health. This report, for the first time, enables a statewide picture of food safety activities to be provided. The information collated through this process will assist policymakers in both state and local government to identify areas in need of attention and where additional regulatory effort should be focused. In delivering this report, there has been a vast amount of goodwill and collaborative effort by officers from the Department of Health, and within and across councils. In addition to the introduction of many new changes that council staff have needed to understand and explain to food businesses over the past 12 months, municipalities have also worked diligently to adjust their administrative processes so their data is in a format that can be shared with others. While this process remains ongoing and improvements are required, we are proud of councils’ commitment and the considerable inroads that have been made so far.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Community Care Review September 2000 Author: Jan Carter
    REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY CARE REVIEW September 2000 Jan Carter Deakin Human Services Australia Deakin University Report of the Community Care Review September 2000 Author: Jan Carter © Department of Human Services, September 2000 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted by the Copyright Act MCMLXVIII, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Department of Human Services, 555 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria. IBSN 0 731160 92 4 Report of the Community Care Review Summary ii Contents Summary viii Chapter 1The context 1 Overview 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Terms of reference 2 1.3 Review approaches 3 1.4 The key questions 4 1.5 Youth and Family Services Redevelopment, 1997–99 4 1.6 Themes 5 1.7 This Report 18 Chapter 2 The past: The YAFS Redevelopment and the reaction 21 Overview 21 2.1 Introduction 22 2.2 The environment for the Redevelopment 24 2.3 The Redevelopment 26 2.4 Problems and weaknesses of the Redevelopment 29 2.5 The positive aspects of the Redevelopment 36 2.6 Summary of information from consultations 40 2.7 Models of public administration 41 Report of the Community Care Review Summary iii 2.8 Summary and recommendation 47 Chapter 3 The future: principles and priorities for reform 48 Overview 48 3.1 Principles for community care services: the consultations 49 3.2 Principles for guiding reform 53 3.3 Opportunities and priorities 56 3.4 Implications 61 3.5 Building blocks for future network capability 62 3.6 Summary and recommendations 71 Chapter 4 The future: building resilient
    [Show full text]
  • October 2006
    N e w s www.ptua.org.au ISSN 0817 – 0347 Volume 30 No. 4 October 2006 State election looms: Parties challenged on transport Going into the state election, the PTUA is (including duplication of single track and challenging the major political parties to commit to signalling upgrades where this is necessary) funding real solutions to Melbourne and Victoria’s • transport problems. Upgrades to regional town bus services in line with those taking place in Melbourne: routes to With endemic traffic congestion and pollution, and operate 7 days a week into the evening (despite a brief respite recently) petrol prices set to • continue to climb, it is time to offer more people a Genuine priority for bus and tram services to genuine alternative to driving. ensure these vehicles are not delayed by heavy traffic Key commitments must include: • Commence removal of level crossings, • Reform of the Planning and Transport beginning with those worst affected by high Ministries to overhaul the management culture train frequencies, tram/train crossings and buses and ensure a holistic view of land-use planning held up in traffic and transport issues, to ensure the best “triple- bottom-line” (environmental, social, economic) The PTUA was highly critical of the government’s outcomes Meeting Our Transport Challenges document when it was released in May, because for all the money • Redesign of the bus system into a co-ordinated, being spent, very little is going towards getting direct, frequent, easy-to-understand network people out of their cars and onto public transport. that genuinely complements the train and tram With a few trivial exceptions, there is no systems in providing all of Melbourne with commitment to any the urgent priorities listed transport choices above.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Human Services, Victoria
    DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, VICTORIA Development of a Resource Allocation Model for the Post Acute Care Program FINAL REPORT Healthcare Management Advisors Pty Ltd ACN 081 895 507 1st Floor, 65 Henley Beach Road, Mile End, SA, 5031 PO Box 10086 Gouger Street, Adelaide SA 5000 Phone (08) 8150 5555 Fax (08) 8150 5599 15th September 2000 Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 THE POST ACUTE CARE PROGRAM ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 PROGRAM OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 TYPES OF PAC SERVICES PROVIDED ........................................................................................................ 13 2.3 STAFFING ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 FUNDING ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 PAC PROGRAM ISSUES IMPACTING ON RESOURCE ALLOCATION MODEL
    [Show full text]
  • Our Asset Management Journey
    Our Asset Management Journey Professor Sujeeva Setunge Deputy Dean, Research and Innovation School of Engineering 1 RMIT Journey in Infrastructure Asset Management • Central Asset Management System (CAMS) for Buildings • CAMS-Drainage • Disaster resilience of bridges, culverts and floodways • CAMS-Bridges • Automated Tree inventory using airborne LiDar and Aerial imagery • Intelligent Asset Management in Community Partnership – A smart cities project • Future cities CRC – New!! 2 CAMS for Buildings CAMS Mobile • Australian Research council grant in partnership with – MAV – City of Glen Eira – City of Kingston – City of greater Dandenong – Mornington Peninsula shire – City of Monash – City of Brimbank • State government grant to develop the cloud hosted platform • City of Melbourne investment to develop practical features such as backlog, scenario analysis, risk profile • RMIT University property services and City of Melbourne – CAMS Mobile inspection app 3 CAMS for Buildings - Features 1. Database management 2. Data exploration 3. Deterioration prediction 4. Budget calculation 5. Backlog estimation 6. Risk management 4 4 RMIT University©2015 CAMS clients Property Services Australia | Vietnam 5 CAMS TECHNOLOGY - Buildings Current Capability Research In Progress Next stage Data Driven Models for Multi-objective . Cross assets CAMS 700 components Decision Making . Augmented Cost and other input Life-Cycle Physical degradation Reality Scenarios Analysis Modelling modelling – improve . Emergency Risk-cost Relationship accuracy manageme
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Government Gazette No
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 161 Monday 22 August 2005 By Authority. Victorian Government Printer Road Safety Act 1986 ROAD SAFETY (VEHICLES) REGULATIONS 1999 Class 1 Notice as to Load Carrying Vehicles and Load Carrying Combinations and Notice as to Areas and Routes on which and Times at which Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicles and Load Carrying Combinations may be used Regulation 105(2)(e) of the Road Safety (Vehicles) Regulations 1999 provides that for the purposes of those Regulations the Corporation may by notice published in the Government Gazette declare an area to be an urban area. Regulation 502 of those Regulations provides that the Corporation may by a notice published in the Government Gazette exempt a category of Class 1 vehicles from – (a) a mass or dimension limit, other than a limit that relates to a GVM or GCM or a manufacturer’s limit; or (b) from any other requirement – set out in Schedule 1 to the Regulations. Clause 7 of Schedule 1 to the Regulations provides that a Class 1 vehicle may only be used on a highway – (a) that is in an area or on a route; and (b) at the times – specified by the Corporation by notice published in the Government Gazette. In accordance with those provisions, I, Ted Vincent, delegate of the Corporation – (a) exempt a Class 1 vehicle carrying a large indivisible item and a Class 1 vehicle that is specially designed to carry a large indivisible item from the night travel restrictions and pilot vehicle requirement in Clause 21 of Schedule 1 to the Regulations; and (b) declare the areas, routes, times and conditions set out in Annexure 1 to this Notice for a Class 1 vehicle carrying a large indivisible item and a Class 1 vehicle that is specially designed to carry a large indivisible item, subject to Annexure 2 and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Across the State with an Urgent Need for Support
    4/13/2021 Parliament of Victoria Question: 7472 QUESTION ON NOTICE — Mr Bull (Gippsland East) to ask the Minister for Housing, Disability and Ageing — With the roll out of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in the Wellington local government area not occurring until 1 January 2019, what will the Minister do to ensure that people on the Disability Support Register in that area are immediately transitioned as a priority to the NDIS so that they do not have to wait for the scheduled NDIS geographical roll out to commence receiving a support package. Answer: I am informed that: Over 1200 people registered on the Disability Support Register (DSR) across the state with an urgent need for support will be provided with the opportunity to transition to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) within the first 12 months of roll out. This includes people living in the Areas scheduled to transition during this period, as well as others with an immediate and pressing need for support, who will be provided with the opportunity to transition to the NDIS ahead of their planned area schedule. Any remaining people on the DSR will be the first group to enter the scheme in each area as the area commences the transition. Martin Foley MP Minister for Housing, Disability and Ageing Attachments: No Attachments Answer Published Date: 31/05/2016 Question: 7473 QUESTION ON NOTICE — Mr Bull (Gippsland East) to ask the Minister for Housing, Disability and Ageing — With the roll out of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in the West Wimmera local government area not occurring until 1 October 2017, what will the Minister do to ensure that people on the Disability Support Register in that area are immediately transitioned as a priority to the NDIS so that they do not have to wait for the scheduled NDIS geographical roll out to commence receiving a support package.
    [Show full text]
  • Waurn Ponds Stabling and Maintenance Facility Planning Scheme Amendment GC 104
    Waurn Ponds Stabling and Maintenance Facility Planning Scheme Amendment GC 104 Date: 03/02/20 Author: Mike Stephens Version: Final Recipient/s: Ashurst Australia Waurn Ponds Stabling and Maintenance Facility Planning Scheme Amendment GC 104 Expert Witness Report Mike Stephens Yendon a 96 Harbours Road, Yendon VIC 3352 I p 03 5341 6100 I f 03 5341 7630 I e [email protected] Casterton a PO Box 226, 32 Henty Street, Casterton, VIC 3311 I p 03 5581 2826 I f 03 5581 2746 I e [email protected] abn 63 093 095 875 I acn 093 095 875 I www.meridian-ag.com.au 1. Expert qualifications and experience - Michael (Mike) Richard Stephens Mike holds a Diploma of Farm Management, and an MSc. He is an accredited advisor with Family Business Australia, is a Chartered Agricultural Professional (CAG) with the Ag Institute of Australia and is currently a PhD candidate studying Family Farm Business Succession. He is a Churchill Fellow (Farm Business Management), was awarded the inaugural Marcus Oldham College Excellence in Agriculture Award and is a Fellow of The Ag Institute Australia and the Australian Institute of Company Directors. Following experience as a Jackaroo, Stockman with New Zealand Loan, (Stock and Station Agency) and as a Snowy Mountains Scheme Worker, Mike graduated from Marcus Oldham and commenced working as a Property Manager in 1967. During his career as a property manager Mike managed properties running merino sheep and stud and commercial beef cattle. From 1983 to the present day Mike has been a Director of Meridian Agriculture (formerly Mike Stephens and Associates - MS&A), which is a broad based agricultural consulting company, providing advice, training and services to farmers, agribusiness and government.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020
    Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020 Version: 1.1 Date approved: 22 December 2015 Reviewed: 15 January 2019 Responsible Department: Planning Related policies: Nil 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 5 4 Scope .................................................................................................................... 5 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 6 Gambling and EGMs in the City of Casey ........................................................... 6 7 City of Casey Position on Electronic Gaming Machines ................................... 7 7.1 Advocacy & Partnerships ....................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Economy ....................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Consultation & Information Provision ...................................................................... 9 7.4 Community Wellbeing ............................................................................................ 9 7.5 Planning Assessment ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Yarra
    the future of the Yarra ProPosals for a Yarra river Protection act the future of the Yarra A about environmental Justice australia environmental Justice australia (formerly the environment Defenders office, Victoria) is a not-for-profit public interest legal practice. funded by donations and independent of government and corporate funding, our legal team combines a passion for justice with technical expertise and a practical understanding of the legal system to protect our environment. We act as advisers and legal representatives to the environment movement, pursuing court cases to protect our shared environment. We work with community-based environment groups, regional and state environmental organisations, and larger environmental NGos. We also provide strategic and legal support to their campaigns to address climate change, protect nature and defend the rights of communities to a healthy environment. While we seek to give the community a powerful voice in court, we also recognise that court cases alone will not be enough. that’s why we campaign to improve our legal system. We defend existing, hard-won environmental protections from attack. at the same time, we pursue new and innovative solutions to fill the gaps and fix the failures in our legal system to clear a path for a more just and sustainable world. envirojustice.org.au about the Yarra riverkeePer association The Yarra Riverkeeper Association is the voice of the River. Over the past ten years we have established ourselves as the credible community advocate for the Yarra. We tell the river’s story, highlighting its wonders and its challenges. We monitor its health and activities affecting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Access
    BAYSIDE PLANNING SCHEME 21.09 TRANSPORT AND ACCESS 09/05/2013 C100 Proposed This Clause provides local content to support Clause 18 (Transport) of the State Planning C124 Policy Framework. Overview Bayside is serviced by rail, a tram and buses; however there are large areas of the municipality which rely principally on the private motor vehicle for transport. The eastern boundary of the municipality is well serviced by the Frankston railway line, which has stations at Moorabbin (within Kingston City Council), Highett and Cheltenham. The State Government is currently progressing the establishment of a train station adjacent to the Southland Shopping Centre, an Activity Centre and area identified to support growth. The Sandringham railway line also dissects the northern and central sections of the municipality with stations at Elsternwick (within Glen Eira), Gardenvale, North Brighton, Middle Brighton, Brighton Beach, Hampton and Sandringham. This service does not extend to Black Rock and Beaumaris and these areas rely solely on bus services. Trams are restricted to a single route in Brighton East running along Hawthorn Road, terminating at the Nepean Highway. Bus services are provided throughout the municipality. The Nepean Highway is the major arterial road linking the municipality to the Melbourne CBD to the north and the south eastern suburbs and Mornington Peninsula to the south. There are also a number of primary and secondary arterial roads including Beach Road, North Road, South Road, Centre Road, Bluff Road and Balcombe Road which traverse the municipality. Bayside is serviced by the Sandringham and Frankston railway lines with a total of 9 stations, in addition there are 15 bus routes linking major shopping centres, Monash University, Central Melbourne and other suburbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Yarra's Topography Is Gently Undulating, Which Is Characteristic of the Western Basalt Plains
    Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Acknowledgement of country ............................................................................................................................ 3 Message from the Mayor ................................................................................................................................... 4 Vision and goals ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Nature in Yarra .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Policy and strategy relevant to natural values ................................................................................................. 27 Legislative context ........................................................................................................................................... 27 What does Yarra do to support nature? .......................................................................................................... 28 Opportunities and challenges for nature .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Brimbank Housing Strategy
    HOME AND HOUSED The Brimbank Housing Strategy August 2012 OVERVIEW Our Vision Th e Brimbank Housing Strategy, ‘Home and Housed’, has been developed by talking to the community, as well as conducting research and analysis Our vision for housing in the City of Brimbank is: since late 2010. • A place to live - accommodating growth by determining the location Th e main challenges the ‘Home and Housed’ strategy seeks to address are: of new housing in Brimbank. • Population growth. • A home for everybody - meeting the housing needs of diff erent people in the Brimbank community. • An ageing population. • Liveable neighbourhoods - protecting Brimbank’s existing suburbs • Housing aff ordability, both for homes to buy and to rent. and ensuring supporting infrastructure, including green open space, • More choice in housing. is provided. • Keeping the suburban character of Brimbank that residents enjoy. Th e population of Brimbank is growing and housing needs are changing. Th e municipality adjoins the Melton and Wyndham growth areas - which • Th e provision of roads, drainage, sewerage, green open spaces, together form the fastest growing region in Australia. As metropolitan transport etc., sometimes referred to as ‘infrastructure capacity’, in Melbourne re-orientates to the west, the pressure for residential conjunction with residential development. development in Brimbank will continue. Th e Brimbank Housing Strategy • Development of local residential design guidelines to preserve local is about responding to this growth and putting in place a plan that will character. determine where new housing is best located so that the existing character of Brimbank’s suburbs is protected. Th e Brimbank Housing Strategy, ‘Home and Housed’, is Council’s ten year plan to manage future housing growth so that it best meets the needs of the community into the future.
    [Show full text]