- voorstellen - interrumpeer vooral - preliminary, ‘dust hasn’t settled yet’ so mainly focus on ideas, rather then hardcore calculations

SUPERSYMMETRY NONCOMMUTATIVE& GEOMETRY

Thijs van den Broek Workshop Bayrischzell Radboud Univ. Nijmegen / NIKHEF May 22nd, 2011 INTRODUCTIONIntro The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with

Title may be a bit (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM) misleading

Merits come from spectral action

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry

Title may be a bit (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM) misleading

How supersymmetric is the resulng acon?

Merits come from spectral (So: no superfields or anything...) action

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry

Title may be a bit (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM) misleading

How supersymmetric is the resulng acon?

Merits come from spectral (So: no superfields or anything...) action

Does it share the merits of ‘ordinary’ supersymmetry? (E.g. hierarchy problem)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry

Title may be a bit (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM) misleading

How supersymmetric is the resulng acon?

Merits come from spectral (So: no superfields or anything...) action

Does it share the merits of ‘ordinary’ supersymmetry? (E.g. hierarchy problem)

Can we predict anything from this? (E.g. scalar masses, c.f Higgs mass)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry

Title may be a bit (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM) misleading

How supersymmetric is the resulng acon?

Merits come from spectral (So: no superfields or anything...) action

Does it share the merits of ‘ordinary’ supersymmetry? (E.g. hierarchy problem)

Can we predict anything from this? (E.g. scalar masses, c.f Higgs mass) Why want this?

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM)

Why want this?

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM)

Why want this?

Promising BSM candidate.

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM)

Why want this?

Promising BSM candidate.

To see what NCG might have in store for us.

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The research project

Joint work with Walter van Suijlekom and Wim Beenakker

Try to extend the Standard Model from NCG with supersymmetry (Everywhere: N=1 supersymmetry , i.e. MSSM)

Why want this?

Promising BSM candidate.

To see what NCG might have in store for us.

Unificaon of coupling constants:

vs

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Movang example: super-QCD [1] (1/2) Opmerken dat canoniek spectraal tripel voor de rest van het praatje geimpliceerd is.

Take: - 3, 3^o: Breakdown vanaf SM - Dus je voegt M_3(C) toe aan de eindige Hilbert ruimte. tensored with

where

parametrizing a 3-tuple and its conjugate.

1TvdB, W. D. van Suijlekom, Physics Letters B 699 (2011), 119–122

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Movang example: super-QCD [1] (1/2) Opmerken dat canoniek spectraal tripel voor de rest van het praatje geimpliceerd is.

Take: - 3, 3^o: Breakdown vanaf SM - Dus je voegt M_3(C) toe aan de eindige Hilbert ruimte. tensored with

where

’ ‘anquark’ ‘

parametrizing a 3-tuple and its conjugate.

1TvdB, W. D. van Suijlekom, Physics Letters B 699 (2011), 119–122

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Movang example: super-QCD [1] (2/2)

Inner fluctuaons

parametrize (an)squark

Extra termen = tov ‘qcd’

Inner product goed?

1TvdB, W. D. van Suijlekom, Physics Letters B 699 (2011), 119–122

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Movang example: super-QCD [1] (2/2)

Inner fluctuaons

parametrize (an)squark

Gauge group : superpartners

Extra termen = tov ‘qcd’

Inner product goed?

1TvdB, W. D. van Suijlekom, Physics Letters B 699 (2011), 119–122

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Movang example: super-QCD [1] (2/2)

Inner fluctuaons

parametrize (an)squark

Gauge group : superpartners

Spectral acon , extra terms:

Extra termen = tov ‘qcd’

Inner product: Inner product goed?

1TvdB, W. D. van Suijlekom, Physics Letters B 699 (2011), 119–122

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Movang example: super-QCD [1] (2/2)

Inner fluctuaons

parametrize (an)squark

Gauge group : superpartners

Spectral acon , extra terms:

Extra termen = tov ‘qcd’

Inner product: Inner product goed?

SUSY automacally broken: (minus) mass terms for squarks.

1TvdB, W. D. van Suijlekom, Physics Letters B 699 (2011), 119–122

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry APPROACHAPPR The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The approach

Problem: More realisc situaons: calculaons get out of hand

More systemacal approach needed (cf. superfields)

Spectral triple is the basic object: want susy at that level

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The approach

Problem: More realisc situaons: calculaons get out of hand

More systemacal approach needed (cf. superfields)

Plan: 1) Define ‘supersymmetric spectral triple‘

Spectral triple is the basic object: want susy at that level

2) Prove ‘susy spectral triple’ supersymmetric acon

spectral acon

3) MSSM as a special case

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Krajewski diagram:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Krajewski diagram:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Grading

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Grading

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Grading

Dirac operator

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Grading

Dirac operator

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Grading

Dirac operator

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Grading

Dirac operator

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Intermezzo: Krajewski diagrams

Finite spectral triple: Waarom deze slide: dingen wat concreter maken. Alle eigenschappen ve eindig spectraal tripel af te lezen aan K diagram

Grading

Dirac operator ‘KO-dimension’

Krajewski diagram: ......

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Superpartners (1/2)

General scheme as in super-QCD:

Parcle Superpartner

fermions: : Hilbert space finite Dirac operator

gauge bosons: gauginos: Dirac operator on Hilbert space (adjoint reps.)

Higgs: Higgsinos: finite Dirac operator Hilbert space

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Superpartners (2/2)

Gauge group:

:

Parcle Superpartner

fermions: sfermions: case of super QCD fits in Hilbert space finite Dirac operator

gauge bosons: gauginos: Dirac operator on Hilbert space (adjoint reps.)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Superpartners (2/2)

Gauge group:

:

Parcle Superpartner

fermions: sfermions: case of super QCD fits in Hilbert space finite Dirac operator

gauge bosons: gauginos: Dirac operator on Hilbert space (adjoint reps.)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Superpartners (2/2)

Gauge group:

:

Parcle Superpartner

fermions: sfermions: case of super QCD fits in Hilbert space finite Dirac operator

gauge bosons: gauginos: Dirac operator on Hilbert space (adjoint reps.)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Superpartners (2/2)

Gauge group:

:

Parcle Superpartner

fermions: sfermions: case of super QCD fits in Hilbert space finite Dirac operator

gauge bosons: gauginos: Dirac operator on Hilbert space (adjoint reps.)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Superpartners (2/2)

Gauge group:

:

Parcle Superpartner

fermions: sfermions: case of super QCD fits in Hilbert space finite Dirac operator

gauge bosons: gauginos: Dirac operator on Hilbert space (adjoint reps.)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

R-parity & KO-dimension (1/2)

Problem the gaugino-sector (adjoint elements of ) incompable with

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

R-parity & KO-dimension (1/2)

Problem the gaugino-sector (adjoint elements of ) incompable with

In fact parts of finite spectral triple possibly of different KO- dimensions

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

R-parity & KO-dimension (1/2)

Problem the gaugino-sector (adjoint elements of ) incompable with

In fact parts of finite spectral triple possibly of different KO- dimensions

Soluon given: two spectral triples of KO-dimension (say)

an operator with:

Direct sum:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

R-parity & KO-dimension (2/2)

Onderstrepen: een manier Direct sum: om het te zien.

Use to ‘even out’ the KO dimensions:

three new signs (‘super-KO-dimension’?)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

R-parity & KO-dimension (2/2)

Onderstrepen: een manier Direct sum: om het te zien.

Use to ‘even out’ the KO dimensions:

three new signs (‘super-KO-dimension’?)

Example KO-dimensions 6 (SM) and 0 (gauginos) has:

i.e.

Role ‘R-parity’, where

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

A supersymmetric spectral triple

Definion We call an R-parity extended spectral triple:

a spectral triple that is extended with a grading sasfying:

such that where

with only

We write:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

A supersymmetric spectral triple

Definion We call an R-parity extended spectral triple:

a spectral triple that is extended with a grading sasfying:

such that (...) Definion An R-parity extended spectral triple is supersymmetric when: each element that transforms under the gauge group comes in both -values. all allowed components of the - part of the Dirac operator are nonzero.

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

A supersymmetric spectral triple

Definion We call an R-parity extended spectral triple:

a spectral triple that is extended with a grading sasfying:

such that (...) Definion An R-parity extended spectral triple is supersymmetric when: each element that transforms under the gauge group comes in both -values. all allowed components of the - part of the Dirac operator are nonzero. Hope (sll) The acon resulng from such a spectral triple (via the spectral acon principle) is automacally supersymmetric.

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry APPLICATIONAPPR The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM?

A nice way to look at things is provided by Chamseddine & Connes [2]:

Look for irreducible soluons of a pair :

Chamseddine & Connes, Why the Standard Model, 0706.3688v1 [hep-th]

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM?

A nice way to look at things is provided by Chamseddine & Connes [2]:

Look for irreducible soluons of a pair :

Either: acng on with

Chamseddine & Connes, Why the Standard Model, 0706.3688v1 [hep-th]

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM?

A nice way to look at things is provided by Chamseddine & Connes [2]:

Look for irreducible soluons of a pair :

Either: acng on with

Or: acng on

with

Chamseddine & Connes, Why the Standard Model, 0706.3688v1 [hep-th]

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM?

A nice way to look at things is provided by Chamseddine & Connes [2]:

Look for irreducible soluons of a pair :

Either: acng on with Incompable with

Or: acng on

with

Chamseddine & Connes, Why the Standard Model, 0706.3688v1 [hep-th]

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM?

A nice way to look at things is provided by Chamseddine & Connes [2]:

Look for irreducible soluons of a pair :

Either: acng on with Incompable with

Or: acng on

with

Chamseddine & Connes, Why the Standard Model, 0706.3688v1 [hep-th]

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM Why the MSSM

Observaon: Given the soluon for the algebra we we can take not only but in addion to that also the soluon for each of the two components of the algebra:

with

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM Why the MSSM

Observaon: Given the soluon for the algebra we we can take not only but in addion to that also the soluon for each of the two components of the algebra:

with

There is an R-parity operator:

(From )

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM Why the MSSM

Observaon: Given the soluon for the algebra we we can take not only but in addion to that also the soluon for each of the two components of the algebra:

with

SM parcles There is an R-parity operator:

(From )

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM Why the MSSM

Observaon: Given the soluon for the algebra we we can take not only but in addion to that also the soluon for each of the two components of the algebra:

with

SM parcles “Gaugino’s” There is an R-parity operator:

(From )

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Why the SM Why the MSSM

Observaon: Given the soluon for the algebra we we can take not only but in addion to that also the soluon for each of the two components of the algebra:

with

SM parcles “Gaugino’s” There is an R-parity operator:

(From )

(Krajewski diagrams: representaons have a solid fill.)

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM

Inial situaon: 1.

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM

Inial situaon: 1.

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM

Inial situaon: 1.

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: A vs A^C

1.

2.

As the result of a grading:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: A vs A^C

1.

2.

As the result of a grading:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: A vs A^C

1.

2.

As the result of a grading:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: A vs A^C

1.

2.

As the result of a grading:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: A vs A^C

1.

2.

As the result of a grading:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: A vs A^C

1.

2.

As the result of a grading:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM:

1.

2.

3.

By adding a Majorana mass for the right handed neutrino

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM:

1.

2.

3.

By adding a Majorana mass for the right handed neutrino

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM:

1.

2.

3.

By adding a Majorana mass for the right handed neutrino Bino

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM:

1.

2.

3.

By adding a Majorana mass for the right handed neutrino Bino

Gluino

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: Wino/Zino

1.

2.

3.

By adding a Majorana mass for the right handed neutrino Bino

Gluino

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: Higgsinos Wino/Zino

1.

2.

3.

By adding a Majorana mass for the right handed neutrino Bino

Gluino

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

The supersymmetric spectral triple for the MSSM’

Three steps to the (MS)SM: Higgsinos Wino/Zino + new parcles

1.

2.

3.

By adding a Majorana mass for the right handed neutrino Bino

Gluino

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry PRELIMINARYPrel RESULTS The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Gauge group | Unificaon

The gauge group:

is sll

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Gauge group | Unificaon

The gauge group:

is sll

We sll have unificaon:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Gauge group | Unificaon

The gauge group:

is sll

We sll have coupling constant unificaon:

This happens only because we have more parcles than the MSSM itself provides!

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Fermion doubling | Chiral anomalies

Copies of fermions exceed those of gaugino’s by a factor of four. Change inner product in:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Fermion doubling | Chiral anomalies

Copies of fermions exceed those of gaugino’s by a factor of four. Change inner product in:

Hypercharges:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Fermion doubling | Chiral anomalies

Copies of fermions exceed those of gaugino’s by a factor of four. Change inner product in:

Hypercharges:

All come in pairs of opposite charges: chiral anomalies cancel

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Comments on supersymmetry

NCG treats bosons & fermions differently

No auxiliary fields (on-shell descripon)

Automacally broken by masses

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Comments on supersymmetry

NCG treats bosons & fermions differently

No auxiliary fields (on-shell descripon)

Automacally broken by sfermion masses

Nonetheless: definitely susy-like properes

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Comments on supersymmetry

NCG treats bosons & fermions differently

No auxiliary fields (on-shell descripon)

Automacally broken by sfermion masses

Nonetheless: definitely susy-like properes

Try to prove susy modulo sfermion potenal terms:

1. prove susy for both soluons given by C&C:

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Comments on supersymmetry

NCG treats bosons & fermions differently

No auxiliary fields (on-shell descripon)

Automacally broken by sfermion masses

Nonetheless: definitely susy-like properes

Try to prove susy modulo sfermion potenal terms:

1. prove susy for both soluons given by C&C:

2. prove that susy stays intact upon breaking

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry OUTLOOKOUT The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Summary & Outlook

✓ ‘Supersymmetric spectral triple’ ? Supersymmetric acon / explicit susy transformaons

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Summary & Outlook

✓ ‘Supersymmetric spectral triple’ ? Supersymmetric acon / explicit susy transformaons ✓ Applied to SM-algebra gives MSSM’ ✓ Gauge group intact, anomaly free theory ✓ Coupling constant unificaon ? Role & effects extra parcles?

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Summary & Outlook

✓ ‘Supersymmetric spectral triple’ ? Supersymmetric acon / explicit susy transformaons ✓ Applied to SM-algebra gives MSSM’ ✓ Gauge group intact, anomaly free theory ✓ Coupling constant unificaon ? Role & effects extra parcles?

? Predicons?

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry The project Approach Applicaon Preliminary results Outlook

Summary & Outlook

✓ ‘Supersymmetric spectral triple’ ? Supersymmetric acon / explicit susy transformaons ✓ Applied to SM-algebra gives MSSM’ ✓ Gauge group intact, anomaly free theory ✓ Coupling constant unificaon ? Role & effects extra parcles?

? Predicons? For more (conclusive) results: stay tuned!

Thijs van den Broek (RU Nijmegen) Noncommutave geometry & supersymmetry