DOCSLIB.ORG

High Times > JON GETTMAN's RESEARCH LIBRARY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Times > JON GETTMAN's RESEARCH LIBRARY High Times > JON GETTMAN'S RESEARCH LIBRARY 11/05/10 13:51 HOME MAGAZINE HEADSHOP CLASSIFIEDS NEWS GROW ACTIVISM EVENTS ENTERTAINMENT MISS HT VIDEO GALLERIES SUBMISSIONS VIDEO Galleries News search go JON GETTMAN'S RESEARCH LIBRARY hightimes.com 420.com 50 links you need to see before writing a cannabis research paper Tue, Sep 13, 2005 5:19 pm more: activism news Jack Herer Photo Gallery Anyone interested in the legalization of marijuana soon discovers that drug policy Some of our favorite shots of Jack... Photos by Dan Skye Tue Apr 20, 2010 reform of any kind is a complicated issue. One sure thing, though, is that more galleries 6 accurate information remains one of the most persuasive and powerful tools available to reformers. The key to getting accurate information is, whenever possible, to go to the source. sponsored links Formula 420 Detox Bud Smokers Wanted Discount Hydroponics Single Seeds Here are fifty links to valuable background information on marijuana and drug Legal Buds and Legal Bud Dutch Green Bud policy reform. While collected primarily for students and activists these sites also Pass a Drug Test provide interesting data, articles, commentary, and analysis for the general Grow Your Own! Bud Bud Bud Bud How to Breed Better Pot public. These links fall into four broad categories, providing sources for data, Shrooms They say two heads are better than one, analysis, legal and public policy context, and background on non-profit Drug Test: When You Need To Know 2010's Best Vaporizer and that goes double when youʼre organization management. They contain valuable information for the serious talking about the … Legal Buds Hawaiian Bud Sale! Wed May 05, 2010 more videos 2 reformer as well as interesting perspectives for interested observer. Get High Grade Bud! Buy Krypto, Dro, Skunk Bud sponsored links Drug Test Best Blueberry Bud Leaves of Grass Bud Soda Can Safes Seeds Pipes & Bongs Grow Box Top Vaporizers & Volcano The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) Make Your Own Bubble Hash Herb Grinders Smoke Marijuana? 420.com - Feed Your Head Best Legal Bud Indoor Hydro Superclosets www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov High Quality Buds 100% Free Bud Better than Spice & K2 Pineapple Express Weed This federal agency coordinates federal drug policy and programs; it is the Papers & Blunt Wraps Blade & Iphone Scales Drug Testing Solutions Vaporizer Superstore primary source Blueberry Bud #1 Best New Vaporizer for government analysis of drug policy issues and developments. Hydroponics Growing Systems #1 Rated LED Grow Lights Free Legal Buds Indoor Growing Barely Legal Buds Poppy Seeds Urine Clean 1 hour Marijuana.com 420 Community All in 1 Hydro Systems MaryJane's Best Smokes Smoke Shop Cultivation Books FirstGov Beat Any Drug Test Organic Gardens Now! Legal Bud Save 75% Harvest Gear Bubble Gum Kush Extreme Vaporizer www.firstgov.gov Chicks, Buds and Bud Pics Bud Box Wholesale Bud Hydroponic Grow Box Systems Sticky Green Bud Head Shop - Smoke Shop This portal provides access to every federal agency and important government Buy Kratom Herb Party Pills 420 Stuff High Power LED Grow Lights programs. Marijuana Dating & Personals Passing Drug Tests Made Easy Cheap Vaporizers Buy Buds Online Hydroponics Systems Hookah Waterpipes Blunt Smokers Wanted Monster Smoke Shop Annual National Drug Control Strategy Report seed center Vaporizers Montreal Seedbank Ganja Smokers Wanted Burmese Seeds Orange Krush Bud www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov Weed Seeds Grow Box Premium Amsterdam Seeds Albino Rhino Bud AAA Seeds Hawaiian Haze Bud This annual report analyzes progress in achieving the policy objectives of the Cannabis Seeds Free Vaporizer Contest Administration and the Acquisition of live cannabis seeds is Grow Lights illegal in the United States Best Herbal Head Shop 2010 Congress, and generally makes a case for how the government is winning the Payable in US Dollars from anywhere in Buy Rolling Papers the world Extreme Vaporizers war on drugs. Vintage Pot T-Shirts headshop LED Grow Lights ZEPHYR VAPORIZER Hydroponic Award Winners high times presents National Drug Intelligence Center http://hightimes.com/news/ht_admin/1301 Page 1 sur 9 High Times > JON GETTMAN'S RESEARCH LIBRARY 11/05/10 13:51 HIGH TIMES Pot Smoker's Handbook www.usdoj.gov Check out the definitive guide to marijuana from the world's most trusted The Bush Administration has eliminated funding for this agency, however it is name when it comes to getting high. Plus: "420 currently "the nation's 2010's Best Vaporizer! The New Things to do When You're Stoned!" principal center for strategic domestic counterdrug intelligence." This is an ZEPHYR VAPORIZER is here! The excellent source for Zephyr Ion is the newest, hottest HIGH TIMES CANNABIS CUP vaporizer on the market today. Vaporizer NOVEMBER 2010 - government analysis of trends in key policy indicators such as availability and enthusiasts around the globe are buzzing -- by its unique design & digital features. AMSTERDAM demand. Come judge the greatest 100% Digital at half the cost of the cannabis on earth... VOLCANO! Blows Vapor Bags up to 10 feet tall! Instead of burning tobacco or herbs and inhaling the toxic fumes, DRUG TEST INFO CENTER vaporizing heats the material in a controlled manner. Only the active HIGH TIMES presents Federal Data Sources compounds in the plant become vapor. How To Pass Your Drug Harmful effects of smoking are practically Test! The most eliminated. The eye-catching Ion is made comprehensive and www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov with high quality stainless steel and mesh current guide to drug -the finest safest materials, keeping testing available is just a click away. impurities out and sealing flavor in. More This portal from ONDCP provides access to the original source data used to info... DANNY DANKO'S MORE INFO... GET GROWING NOW: evaluate federal drug A Beginners Guide policy, including survey data on drug use, emergency room visits, drug treatment HIGH TIMES headshop HIGH TIMES Senior admissions, and other Cultivation Editor, Danny HIGH TIMES PRESENTS: JORGE Danko, has compiled key indicators of policy performance. CERVANTES ULTIMATE GROW some of his favorite DVD beginner articles in our Now, for the first time the ultimate guide to getting started. From world's ultimate ganja popping seeds and determining plant guide brings his expertise sex, to choosing systems, harvesting to this instructional DVD - and drying, every aspect of ganja Informing America's Policy on Illegal Drugs: What We Don't Know Keeps taking you step-by-step growing is exposed to all. Hurting Us from seeds and clones to harvest in the high style. HIGH TIMES LEGAL DIRECTORY Jorge … Sometimes the difference www.books.nap.edu more headsop products between freedom and -- select -- incarceration comes down to knowing how to This book from the National Research Council provides important background exercise your legal rights. information on the data used The Latest At Norml Get a crash course here - and stay out of jail! to evaluate drug policy as well as valuable critiques of its use in drug policy NORML.ORG US CO: City, County Prefer Regulating, Not analysis. This is an JORGE CERVANTES' ULTIMATE Banning, Medical Pot GROW DVD SERIES essential guide to the use of federal data sources by drug policy analysts and to (Fri, 07 May 2010) Pueblo Chieftain (CO) The world's ultimate ganja critical evaluation guide teams up with of claims of drug policy success. The National Academy Press (NAP) provides HIGH TIMES for a series of instructional DVD's that on-line access to this and take you step-by-step other publications. from seeds and clones to harvest in high style. HIGH TIMES VAPORIZER REVIEW With an array of models College on the Problems of Drug Dependence boasting a wide range of features at vastly differing prices, the current www.cpdd.vcu.edu vaporizer market can be confusing-but it doesn't have to be. Selecting the "best" vaporizer for you is See what the nation's experts on drugs, pharmacology, and addiction think of about matching the available units with your personal toking preferences. national drug policy. Marijuana legalization will require the support of these professionals. Advocates BLOWIN' SMOKE of marijuana Every now and then stoners need to clear the legalization need to understand how to appeal to the interests and concerns of air. Here are a few fresh professionals in this perspectives on the world of pot smoking. field. HIGH TIMES MEDICAL CANNABIS CUP JUNE 2010 - SAN FRANCISCO RAND Drug Policy Research Center The first annual HIGH TIMES Medical Cannabis Cup will include prizes for www.rand.org the best and most medicinal cannabis, hashish and edibles from California's legal medical marijuana dispensaries. This is one of the nation's most prominent and respected drug policy think-tanks. GROWING WITH L.E.D. LIGHTS Drug policy reformers We've presented all the need to persuade this academic community of the merits of their proposals in facts, but ultimately the order for the public to answer to that can only be determined by you. In take them seriously. As with the example above, advocates of marijuana case you're still having legalization need to understand trouble figuring it all out, here's a few how to effectively communicate this field of professionals. RAND affiliated http://hightimes.com/news/ht_admin/1301 Page 2 sur 9 High Times > JON GETTMAN'S RESEARCH LIBRARY 11/05/10 13:51 trouble figuring it all out, here's a few more facts straight from the HIGH how to effectively communicate this field of professionals. RAND affiliated TIMES Cultivation Labs: analysts are frequently HIGH ON THE AIR consulted by Congress on drug policy issues. HIGH TIMES Radio Show HIGH ON THE AIR, the long-time radio show of HIGH TIMES magazine is Dispelling the Myths About Addiction: Strategies to Increase Understanding making a comeback! We've brought Callum Francis out of retirement in and Strengthen Research order to resurrect HIGH ON THE AIR, the hugely popular Internet radio show that smoked out the Web for years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Just a Little Bit of History Repeating: the California Model of Marijuana Legalization and How It Might Affect Racial and Ethnic Minorities
    Just a Little Bit of History Repeating: The California Model of Marijuana Legalization and How it Might Affect Racial and Ethnic Minorities ∗ Thomas J. Moran Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................... 557 I. When Marijuana Was Marihuana, the "Killer Weed" .................. 561 II. The Whitening of Marijuana ........................................................ 566 III. The Present Day Costs of Marijuana Prohibition ......................... 570 A. Generally, Marijuana Prohibition Has Not Worked .............. 570 B. The Cost of Prohibition on Minorities .................................. 573 IV. Is Legislation such as California’s Marijuana Control Act the Answer for Minority Communities? ...................................... 576 A. Productivity Concerns ........................................................... 578 B. What About Potency Regulation? ......................................... 579 C. The Money Drain from Minority Communities .................... 581 D. Federal Collateral Sanctions Would Still Exist with State Legalization .......................................................... 583 E. Will Legalization Predispose Minority Youth for Future Use? ........................................................................... 586 V. Conclusion ..................................................................................... 589 Introduction In January 2010, a California Assembly Committee passed Assembly Bill 390, entitled the Marijuana Control,
    [Show full text]
  • Up in Smoke: Removing Marijuana from Schedule I
    UP IN SMOKE (DO NOT DELETE) 4/9/2018 12:38 PM UP IN SMOKE: REMOVING MARIJUANA FROM SCHEDULE I DAVID R. KATNER* I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 167 II. DESCRIPTION OF MARIJUANA AND PUBLIC OPINION .......................... 170 III. HISTORY OF MARIJUANA USES AND LAWS IN THE U.S. AND ABROAD ......................................................................................... 174 IV. CREATION OF SCHEDULES OF DRUGS ................................................ 177 V. EVOLUTION OF MEDICINAL APPLICATIONS OF MARIJUANA ............... 178 VI. ADDICTIVE? ........................................................................................ 181 VII. DISSEMINATED PROPAGANDA ABOUT MARIJUANA, AND LEGAL ARBITRARINESS .............................................................................. 184 VIII. RESCHEDULING MARIJUANA TO SCHEDULE II ................................ 190 IX. REMOVING MARIJUANA ALTOGETHER FROM FEDERAL REGULATION .................................................................................. 195 X. CONCLUSION........................................................................................ 202 I. INTRODUCTION Billions of dollars are spent each year arresting, prosecuting, and incarcerating Americans convicted of possession of cannabis or marijuana.1 During the 1970’s, annual marijuana arrests ranged between 420,000 and 500,000 people each year.2 By 1995, there were roughly 600,000 marijuana arrests nationwide, with more Americans being imprisoned
    [Show full text]
  • Lost Taxes and Other Costs of Marijuana Laws
    Lost Taxes and Other Costs of Marijuana Laws by Jon Gettman, Ph.D. The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform www.drugscience.org September 5, 2007 Lost Taxes and Other Costs of Marijuana Laws Executive Summary Government reports indicate that the nation's marijuana laws cost taxpayers $41.8 billion annually. This calculation is based on (a) a reconciliation of estimates of the annual supply of marijuana in the United States and estimates of its overall value and (b) Office of Management and Budget (OMB) data on the share of the Gross Domestic Product diverted by regulatory taxes to US Government budgets. Government reports from the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the Library of Congress, and other sources indicate that the supply of marijuana in the United States is 14,349 metric tons, or 31.1 million pounds. Various price indexes from public and private sources produce a retail price of $7.87/gr or $3,570/lb, setting the overall retail value of the illicit marijuana market at $113 billion. The Office of Management and Budget reports that local, state, and the federal government receipts represent 28.7% of the gross domestic product as tax revenue. The diversion of $113 billion from the taxable economy into the illicit economy deprives taxpayers of $31.1 billion annually. According to the Uniform Crime Reporting Program of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, marijuana arrests consist of 5.54% of all arrests. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that total criminal justice expenditures in the United States in 2004, for example, were $193 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Amount of Tax Revenue Generated by Legalization
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS IS THE GRASS GREENER ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LAW?: THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF LEGALIZING MARIJUANA MICHELLE EVERT Spring 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Economics and Spanish with honors in Economics Reviewed and approved* by the following: David Shapiro Professor of Economics and Co-Director of Undergraduate Studies Thesis Supervisor and Honors Adviser Bee Yan Roberts Professor of Economics and Asian Studies Faculty Reader * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. Abstract This thesis will discuss a variety of economic implications that could result from the legalization of marijuana. It will provide background information on marijuana laws and drug policy, including arguments for and against legalization. Next, the thesis will discuss the estimated tax revenue that can be obtained if marijuana were legalized, drawing on reports by Dr. Jeffrey Miron, Dr. Jon Gettman, and Max Chaiken. The following section presents a cost- savings analysis as argued by Dr. Jeffrey Miron. The thesis will then examine other economic issues affected by legalization and determines that there is the possibility for a successful hemp industry in the United States as well as positive economic implications for Mexico. Finally, the thesis concludes with a libertarian perspective on the issue to demonstrate the way a good number of economists view drug policy an alternative view of legalization outside of the mainstream Democratic and Republican perspectives. i. Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 II. Background Information ........................................................................................................ 4 III. Arguments For and Against Marijuana Legalization .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Popular Culture and the Legal Treatment of Marijuana
    The Chronic 2013: The Evolution of Popular Culture and the Legal Treatment of Marijuana November 12, 2013 Owen M. Panner Inn of Court 1906 - Pure Food and Drugs Act Requires Labeling of Medicine, Including Cannabis Label for Piso's Cure, a cannabis-based medicine, after the passage of the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act Source: antiquecannabisbook.com (accessed Dec. 12, 2011) "[O]n 30 June 1906 President Roosevelt signed the Food and Drugs Act, known simply as the Wiley Act... The basis of the law rested on the regulation of product labeling rather than pre-market approval." US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "FDA History - Part I," FDA website (accessed Dec. 28, 2011) "An Act for preventing the manufacture, sale, or transportation of adulterated or misbranded or poisonous or deleterious foods, drugs, medicines, and liquors, and for regulating traffic therein, and for other purposes... That for the purposes of this Act an article shall also be deemed to be misbranded... if the package fail to bear a statement on the label of the quantity or proportion of any alcohol, morphine, opium, cocaine, heroin, alpha or beta eucaine, chloroform, cannabis indica, chloral hydrate, or acetanilide, or any derivative or preparation of any such substances contained therein." Pure Food and Drug Act (1906) , National Center for Biotechnology Information website, June 30, 1906 Source: http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.timeline.php?timelineID=000026 1911 - Massachusetts Becomes First State to Outlaw Cannabis "Bolstered by Progressive Era faith in big government, the 1910s marked a high tide of prohibitionist sentiment in America. In 1914 and 1916, alcohol prohibition initiatives would make the state ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Cannabis: What Doctors Need to Know
    MOJ Addiction Medicine & Therapy Research Article Open Access Synthetic cannabis: what doctors need to know Abstract Volume 2 Issue 2 - 2016 The use of synthetic cannabinoids (SC) is a serious and ongoing public health problem Panagiota Korenis, Sabina Fink, Ronak Patel, in the United States. It appeals to a younger population as well as people with mental illness. It is inexpensive in comparison to natural marijuana and readily available Raminder Cheema, Houssam Raai, Luisa in the community. Here we explore the psychiatric and medical sequela of SC as Gonzalez well as the ongoing public health concern of this harmful substance and the role for Department of Psychiatry, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, USA psychiatrists. Correspondence: Panagiota Korenis, Program Director, Residency Training, Department of Psychiatry, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, USA, Email [email protected] Received: September 25, 2016 | Published: November 02, 2016 Introduction various brain regions impacting mood, appetite, pain and immunity (Table 1). Currently, there are over 700 researched cannabinoid (CB) Synthetic cannabis (SC) use has become a widespread epidemic receptors identified with CB1 and CB2 playing the most significant in various parts of the United States. Illicit use of this devastating role resulting in psychoactive effects. CB1 receptors are mainly drug is manifested in both psychiatric and medical sequelae, resulting located in the hypothalamus, cerebellum and hippocampus. It has in various clinical presentations and posing a major challenge to an impact on mood, appetite, pain and memory. In addition, SC also clinicians regarding the identification of potential symptoms and has some effect on CB2 which can affect the immune system.2 While subsequent treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Reschedule Cannabis (Marijuana) Per 21 CFR §1308.44(B)
    Petition to Reschedule Cannabis (Marijuana) per 21 CFR §1308.44(b) Filed with the Drug Enforcment Administration by The Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis www.drugscience.org October 9, 2002 PETITION TO RESCHEDULE CANNABIS (MARIJUANA) Exhibit A. Statement of the proposed rule .........................................................................................................3 Exhibit B. Statement of grounds..........................................................................................................................4 Part I – Introduction of argument.........................................................................................................................4 Part II -- Description of new relevant information............................................................................................10 I. Accepted medical use in the United States ...........................................................................................10 State laws.................................................................................................................................................10 Medical professionals ..............................................................................................................................10 Patients' experience and their confirmation by early studies...................................................................10 Reviews of earlier clinical studies ...........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The DEA: Four Decades of Impeding and Rejecting Science
    The DEA: Four Decades of Impeding And Rejecting Science Prepared By: Drug Policy Alliance www.drugpolicy.org MAPS www.maps.org Executive Summary Overruling DEA Administrative Law Judges. A DEA Administrative Law Judge is a government The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is official charged with evaluating the evidence on charged with enforcing federal drug laws. Under the rescheduling and other matters before the DEA and Controlled Substances Act of 1970, its powers include making recommendations based on that evidence to the the authority to schedule drugs (alongside other federal DEA Administrator. In three of the five cases – the first agencies) and to license facilities for the production and marijuana rescheduling petition, the decision to classify use of scheduled drugs in federally-approved research. MDMA as Schedule I, and the case of the researcher Those powers are circumscribed by a statute that seeking an independent marijuana supply – agency requires the agency to make its determinations based on administrators overruled their Administrative Law scientific data. Judges' recommendations. In the cases of the scheduling of marijuana and MDMA, the judges determined that The case studies compiled in this report illustrate a that they should be placed in Schedule II instead of decades-long pattern of behavior that demonstrates the Schedule I, where they would be regulated by the Food agency's inability to exercise its responsibilities in a fair and Drug Administration (FDA) as prescription and impartial manner or to act in accord with the medicines, but still retain criminal sanctions for non- scientific evidence – often as determined by its medical uses. Administrative Law Judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Consequences of Decriminalizing Marijuana
    Rethinking the Consequences of Decriminalizing Marijuana By James Austin, Ph.D. The JFA Institute 5 Walter Houp Court, NE Washington, DC 20002 1 The Decriminalization Movement The past three decades have witnessed a stormy and controversial debate about the possible merits to society that might be brought about by decriminalizing or legalizing marijuana. Beginning in 1973 with Oregon, another 11 states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, and Ohio) have in some manner altered their existing laws to reduce the penalties for marijuana possession.i A number of local cities have also modified their local ordinances and criminal justice practices to either decriminalize pot (Berkeley, Oakland and San Francisco, California, Breckenridge, Colorado, Amherst, Massachusetts, Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Urbana and Carbondale, Illinois, and Colombia, Missouri). There are three central arguments supportive of the decriminalization movement which have been advanced in these and other jurisdictions. Perhaps the most powerful and appealing argument for marijuana decriminalization (and the decriminalization of other illegal drug laws) is that it would save a huge amount of government money now being spent on the enforcement of such laws. The basic tenets of the cost saving argument can be summarized as follows: 1. The criminal justice system, ranging from police to corrections, now allocates a significant portion of its budgets arresting, prosecuting, sentencing and incarcerating marijuana users, dealers and others involved in the illegal drug infrastructure (e.g., transporters, manufacturers of drug paraphernalia, etc.). 2. If these behaviors would no longer be labeled as criminal, criminal justice agencies would reduce the enforcement and processing tasks now associated with such crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Marijuana Legalization, Racial Disparity, and the Hope for Reform
    LCB_23_3_Article_1_Vitiello (Do Not Delete) 7/27/2019 3:08 PM MARIJUANA SYMPOSIUM MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION, RACIAL DISPARITY, AND THE HOPE FOR REFORM by Michael Vitiello * The criminalization of marijuana is rooted in a deeply racist history and has devastated minority communities. Studies show that usage of the drug is con- sistent across racial groups, but arrests of minorities are nevertheless higher than arrests of white offenders. Indeed, those kinds of disparities have per- suaded some voters and policy makers to support legalization of marijuana. California’s initiative, Proposition 64, passed in November 2016 and is now being implemented statewide. Drafters of Proposition 64 were aware of the racial disparity in enforcement of marijuana laws and attempted to offer a remedy. This Article asks whether Proposition 64 can achieve the goal of abat- ing the disproportionate impact of marijuana laws on minority communities. The author is agnostic about whether California will achieve its goal of ad- dressing inequity, certainly not without major changes in current regulations and costs of entry to the business. I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 790 II. From Medicinal Marijuana to Evil Weed .............................................. 791 III. Dog Whistles ........................................................................................ 800 IV. Proposition 64 ...................................................................................... 810 V. Unfulfillable
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Cannabis in the United States
    MEDICAL CANNABIS IN THE UNITED STATES Daniel Francis Scott B.S., San Francisco State University, 2001 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO SUMMER 2011 © 2011 Daniel Francis Scott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii MEDICAL CANNABIS IN THE UNITED STATES A Thesis by Daniel Francis Scott Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Edward (Ted) L. Lascher, Ph.D. __________________________________, Second Reader Mary Kirlin, D.P.A. ____________________________ Date iii Student: Daniel Francis Scott I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. __________________________, Department Chair ___________________ Robert W. Wassmer, Ph.D. Date Department of Public Policy and Administration iv Abstract of MEDICAL CANNABIS IN THE UNITED STATES by Daniel Francis Scott In 1970, the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) outlawed cannabis in the United States. Since then, advocates have petitioned to have cannabis rescheduled in a less restrictive manner and sixteen states have decriminalized cannabis for approved medical use. This thesis seeks to explain why certain federal organizations have oppositional policy positions on medical cannabis. It questions the common opinion that the conflict over medical cannabis is either a disagreement over scientific facts or a clash between political motivated actors. Instead, it examines motivations of the federal executive organizations tasked with oversight of the CSA in an attempt to understand their policy position on cannabis. More specifically, this thesis focuses on the policy position on medical cannabis of three organizations: The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), The National Institutes of v Health (NIH) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency
    Wednesday, April 18, 2001 Part II Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency Denial of Petition; Notice VerDate 11<MAY>2000 16:06 Apr 17, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\18APN2.SGM pfrm08 PsN: 18APN2 20038 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2001 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Congress may be amended by the Attorney DEA.2 Also attached is a document prepared General in rulemaking proceedings by DEA that specifies other data relevant to Drug Enforcement Administration prescribed by the Administrative Procedure your petition that DEA considered. Act. 21 U.S.C. 811(a). The Attorney General C. Basis for Denial of Your Petition: The Notice of Denial of Petition has delegated this authority to the Evidence Demonstrates That Marijuana Does Administrator of DEA. 28 CFR 0.100. Have A High Potential For Abuse By letter dated March 20, 2001, the As you have done, any interested party Your petition rests on your contention that Drug Enforcement Administration may petition the Administrator to initiate marijuana does not have a ‘‘high potential for rulemaking proceedings to reschedule a (DEA) denied a petition to initiate abuse’’ commensurate with schedule I or II rulemaking proceedings to reschedule controlled substance. 21 U.S.C. 811(a); 21 of the CSA. The Assistant Secretary has marijuana. Because DEA believes that CFR 1308.43(a). Before initiating such concluded, based on current scientific and this matter is of particular interest to proceedings, the Administrator must gather medical evidence, that marijuana does have members of the public, the agency is the necessary data and request from the a high potential for abuse commensurate publishing below the letter sent to the Secretary of HHS a scientific and medical with schedule I.
    [Show full text]