DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Municipal Spatial Planning Support Programme Muspp Phase 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Municipal Spatial Planning Support Programme Muspp Phase 3 Evaluation of the Municipal Spatial Planning Support Programme MuSPP Phase 3 June 2014 Municipal Spatial Planning Support Programme in Kosovo Implemented by: Financed by: SWEDISH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION Evaluation of the Municipal Spatial Planning Support Programme MuSPP Phase 3 Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme, the United Nations, or its Member States. Excerpts may be produced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. This report, as part of the Municipal Spatial Planning Support Programme, is funded by the Swedish Development Cooperation which does not necessarily share the views expressed hereto. Author: Forbes Davidson Contents Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... i Tables ....................................................................................................................................................... iii Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... v Acronyms and abbreviations .................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................viii Background and aims of the project .................................................................................................viii Purpose and approach of the evaluation ..........................................................................................viii Main findings of the evaluation ........................................................................................................... ix Conclusions and recommendations ..................................................................................................... x Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 The Project ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Evaluation design & methodology ....................................................................................................... 5 Approach to the evaluation............................................................................................................... 5 Limitations of the evaluation ............................................................................................................ 5 Criteria used ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Relevance ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Efficiency ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Impact ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sustainability ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Responsiveness ................................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology: Data collection and analysis .................................................................................... 7 Field visits ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Structure of the report ............................................................................................................................ 8 Chapter 1: Relevance of the project goals and strategy ......................................................................... 9 1.1 Relevance of the approach of the project ..................................................................................... 9 Relevance of the focus on development planning ........................................................................ 9 Relevance of focus on capacity development and integration in ongoing planning and project development ........................................................................................................................10 Relevance of focus on transparent and participatory approaches ............................................10 Relevance of focus on Capital Investment Programmes (CIP) .........................................................10 Relevance of focus on support to Central Institutions ..............................................................10 Relevance to Kosovo’s EU integration process ..........................................................................11 Maintaining Relevance - the flexibility to adapt...........................................................................11 1.2 Assessment of the relevance of the project ................................................................................11 1.3 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................................12 Chapter 2: Effectiveness ...........................................................................................................................13 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................13 2.1 Objective 1: Contribute to sustainable development of partner municipalities through strategic and comprehensive planning interventions with particular focus on the environment ..................................................................................................................................................................15 Objective 1/A: Sustainable development through planning, Component A – Support to smaller Serb-majority municipalities and selected other municipalities ...................................15 Objective 1/B: Sustainable development through planning: Component B – Further support to MuSPP2 partner municipalities ..................................................................................16 2.2 Project Objective 2: Enhanced local democracy through participatory and transparent municipal planning ................................................................................................................................17 a) The coaching approach to capacity development .................................................................17 b) Training courses and events ..................................................................................................18 i Contents c) Documentation ........................................................................................................................20 Publications .......................................................................................................................................20 d) Communication: Web site .........................................................................................................21 Objective 2: Enhanced democracy. Component A – support to smaller Serb-majority municipalities and selected other municipalities ..........................................................................22 Objective 2: Enhanced democracy, Component B – continued support to MuSPP2 municipalities .....................................................................................................................................23 2.3 Objective 3: Improvement of the physical environment through demonstration projects identified and designed through urban planning interventions .....................................................23 Objective 3/A: Demonstration projects, Component A- support to Serb majority and selected other municipalities ...........................................................................................................23 Objective 3/B: Physical demonstration projects Component B, continued support to MuSPP2 municipalities ....................................................................................................................25 2.4 Objective 4: strengthening he capacities of central level institutions (this objective is restricted to component C) .................................................................................................................28
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT January 2020 – January 2021
    PHOTO CREDIT: NORA SIQECA, USAID TEAM ANNUAL REPORT January 2020 – January 2021 USAID Transparent, Effective and Accountable Municipalities Activity in Kosovo USAID Transparent, Effective and Accountable Municipalities (USAID TEAM) Activity in Kosovo ANNUAL REPORT January 11, 2020 – January 10, 2021 Project Title: USAID Transparent, Effective and Accountable Municipalities (USAID TEAM) Activity in Kosovo Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Kosovo Contract Number: AID-167-C-17-00001 COR: Jeton Cana Contractor: DAI Global, LLC Date of Submission: February 11, 2021 Prepared By: USAID TEAM DISCLAIMER: This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by DAI Global, LLC. The author’s views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States Government. USAID TEAM ANNUAL REPORT 2020 | 1 CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 11 USAID TEAM BACKGROUND............................................................................................................. 11 WORK PLAN PROGRESS REPORT .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in JUNIK MUNICIPALITY of JUNIK 2 Invest in JUNIK
    Invest in JUNIK MUNICIPALITY OF JUNIK 2 Invest in JUNIK For Contact Details Visit us at: Web: http://kk.rks-gov.net/junik Layout and Design: www.rrota.com Photography: Municipality Junik 3 Mitrovicë/Mitrovica SERBIASERBIA MONTENEGROONTENEGRO 3HMs3Hý Pristina Junik Gjilan/Gnjilane *MDNRYsĂDNRYLFD Ferizaj/Uroševac Prizren/Prizren AALBANIALBANIA MACEDONIMACEDONIAA 4 Foreword by the Mayor would like to begin my introduction with the slogan “A Truly Urban Regulatory Plans, the Development Plan for the Conservation IUnique Junik” because there few towns that are lucky to be of Cultural Heritage, and the Strategy of Local Development. situated in the heart of the nature – these are Unique chances. The presentation of tourism potential, the preservation and Such is Junik, which breathes between the urban and the nature, the conservation of the kullas (tower houses) as an element of the tamed and the wilderness, the plane and the hillside, and the fi elds cultural heritage are of special priority for our Municipality. and the mountain. We see Junik and its tourism potential in the future as a suitable and The Municipality of Junik is a new one: it was established as a pilot- attractive location for the economic development, and in particular for municipality on 26 September 2005, and was certifi ed on 13 August the promotion of tourism, an area which may improve the business 2008. Albeit being a new municipality, through the engagement environment and bring normal living conditions to its citizens. of the Local Governance, of the people of the municipality and many donors, Junik succeeded in drafting and approving important With Respect strategic documents for the municipality such as: The Municipal Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Local Government Institute Local Governance Academy
    Kosovo Local Government Institute Local Governance Academy Kosovo Local Government Institute Local Governance Academy First Generation Kosovo Local Government Institute www.klg-institute.org Prishtinë Kosovo Local Government Institute Executive Summary Local Governance Academy Local Governance Academy - is a training program, built on the skills, knowledge and three year experience gained by Kosovo Institute of Local Government- KLGI. During this time, KLGI has successfully completed evaluative, research and training programs. KLGI’s main reference point has been both the lawmaking and politics of local government and also the institutional and executive powers. KLGI is actively seeking ways and means to intervene through efforts that strengthens local government. As mentioned above, LGA will gradually offer through training models a way to facilitate speeches, discussions, group works and a platform for the exchange of experiences and information. Initially LGA will focus on elaborating and clarifying the local governance concept in the region and Europe. This will help the participants of the project to invest on the concept of local governance. LGA will offer the opportunity to compare the various models of local governments from the proven democracies of the region. This kind of training makes it possible to discuss and analyse the properties, values of these models which could be than applied to the model of local governance in Kosovo. LGA will constructively criticise and deal with the treatment, interpretation and analysing of the politics and laws that regulate the local government in Kosovo. As a result, the participants of this training, being an important level of government against the central government, will have a chance to protect, promote and advance this level of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Changes in the Ethnic Structure of the Population in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija
    Bulletin of Natural Sciences Research DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/bnsr10-25625 Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020, pp. 23-27. Original Scientific Paper CONTEMPORARY CHANGES IN THE ETHNIC STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION IN THE AUTONOMOUS PROVINCE OF KOSOVO AND METOHIJA SAŠA MILOSAVLJEVIĆ1, JOVO MEDOJEVIĆ1 1Faculty of Sciences, University in Priština – Kosovska Mtrovica, Kosovska Mtrovica, Serbia ABSTRACT Twenty years (1999 - 2019) after the end of the conflict in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija, it can be stated that nowhere in Europe is there such ethnic segregation of the population as is the case with the AP of Kosovo and Metohija. Following the withdrawal of pumped security forces from the entire territory of Kosovo and Metohija and the entry of the United Nations peacekeeping force into the Serbian Autonomous Province, Kosovo Albanians carried out their persecution from Kosovo through terrorist attacks on Serbs and other non- Albanian populations (Montenegrins, Gorans, Roma, Ashkali) carried out their persecution from Kosovo and Metohija and fundamentally changed the ethnic structure of the Province. An insight into the majority of 223.081 exiles and displaced persons from Kosovo and Metohija indicates an exodus against the Serbs. The number of displaced Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians is estimated at about 100.000. The mass persecution of the Serb and other non-Albanian populations has resulted in tremendous changes in the ethnic structure of the Province, which today, with 93% of the total population, is dominated by Albanians, while other ethnic communities have a participation of 7%. Кeywords: Population, Ethnicity, Kosovo and Metohija. destroyed. The same tendencies have continued to this day, along INTRODUCTION with the desecration of cemeteries, stoning and burning of the returnees’ homes (Medojević & Milosavljević, 2019a).
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Language Compliance in Kosovo JUNE 2014
    Municipal language compliance in Kosovo JUNE 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 5 2. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................. 6 3. FUNCTIONING OF THE OFFICE OF THE LANGUAGE COMMISSIONER AND THE LANGUAGE POLICY NETWORK .......................................................................................... 8 4. MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAW ON THE USE OF LANGUAGES .............. 10 4.1. Adoption of municipal regulations for the recognition and use of languages at the municipal level and awareness raising activities ................................................... 10 4.2. Display of municipal signs, notices and bulletin boards ....................................... 12 4.3. Multilingual provision of services ......................................................................... 14 4.4. Interpretation during meetings of representative and executive bodies, and translation of municipal meeting documents and municipal legal acts ...................... 17 4.5. Translation of municipal websites and job vacancies ........................................... 19 4.6. Availability of interpretation and capacity of municipal translation units ........... 20 4.7. Displaying of multilingual street names and road signs ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Five Essential Elements for a Long-Term Solution in Kosovo by Clive Baldwin
    briefing Five essential elements for a long-term solution in Kosovo By Clive Baldwin As the final deadline for international moderators to report without achieving any conclusion. The ‘final deadline’ for to the United Nations on Kosovo approaches, the future of final status was actually previously set as December 2006 – the region remains unclear. Serbia and Russia argue that a year ago. A group of UN experts, under former Finnish Kosovo is part of Serbia and they will not tolerate the President Martti Ahtisaari, spent the year drafting the territory breaking away, while Kosovo’s Prime Minister-elect details of a final settlement – independence for Kosovo. As Hashim Thaci has stated that, if the deadline passes and no Kosovo is currently run by the UN under a Security decision has been announced, Kosovo will proclaim its Council Resolution, it appears the final settlement needs independence. another Resolution, and therefore Russian acquiescence. Uncertainty has clouded the future of Kosovo since It remains to be seen what Thaci will do, and what will 1999. After the war it was given a special status: part of come next for the people of Kosovo. Whatever occurs, the Yugoslavia, but governed by the UN. But this set-up, negotiators must remember that, at its heart, the problems unique in the world, is not a sustainable, long-term of Kosovo lie in the violation of minority rights. If it is solution and it was never meant to be. going to last, any final settlement must resolve these Discussions about the future of Kosovo began even problems.
    [Show full text]
  • YEAR V / No. 79 / 24 AUGUST 2010 LAW No. 03/L-199 on COURTS
    OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / PRISTINA: YEAR V / No. 79 / 24 AUGUST 2010 LAW No. 03/L-199 ON COURTS Assembly of Republic of Kosovo, Based on Article 65 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, Adopts LAW ON COURTS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 The Scope of the Law This Law regulates the organization, functioning and jurisdiction of the courts in the Republic of Kosovo. Article 2 Definitions 1. Terms used in this Law shall have the following meanings: 1.1. Appointment Process - the comprehensive, Kosovo-wide review of the suitability of all applicants for permanent appointments, until the retirement age determined by Law, as judges and prosecutors in Kosovo, carried out in accordance with UNMIK Administrative Direction 2008/02 and Article 150 of the Constitution. 1.2. Basic Court - the court of first instance comprised of seven geographic areas as established by this Law. 1.3. Branch - a geographical subdivision of a Basic Court. 1.4. Court of Appeals - the court of second instance as established by this Law. 1.5. Department - a subcomponent of a court established by this Law for purposes of assigning cases according to subject matter in order to increase the efficiency of the courts. 1.6. Division - a subcomponent of the General Department of a court established for purposes of assigning cases according to subject matter in order to increase the efficiency of the court. 1.7.Kosovo Judicial Council - the independent institution as foreseen by Article 108 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo. 1.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Turnout Among Youth of Kosovo
    Voter Turnout Among Youth of Kosovo July 2016 Voter Turnout Among Youth of Kosovo Copyright © 2016 International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES). All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of IFES. Requests for permission should include the following information: • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive, Floor 10 Arlington, VA 22202 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 202-350-6701 This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contents A. Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 4 B. Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 C. Methodology .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Municipalities from Elections to Solutions
    History of elections History of local elections in Kosovo dates back to 2000, which marked the first elections held, followed by 5 local elections up to now (in 2002, 2007, 2009, 2013 and 2017). After the end of the war, the first elections at the local level were held on October 28, 2000, which were administered and supervised by OMIK (The OSCE Mission in Kosovo). The second local elections were held on October 26, 2002. During 2002, UNMIK’s decision had been to postpone the mandate of Municipal Assemblies until 2007. As a result, joint central and local elections were held in 2007. The third local elections were held on November 17, 2007, which marked the first local elections organized by UNMIK/OMIK with temporary self-governing institutions, before Kosovo declared its independence. Until 2007, citizens voted in closed lists for the parties that would be represented in the Municipal Assembly based on UNMIK Regulation 2000/45 (On the municipal self-governance). In this case, the municipal assembly members were elected by the Chairperson of the Assembly. Apart from exercising the duty in the Assembly, the Chairperson was also a representative of the Municipality. Whereas, the Chief Executive Officer held the executive role and was elected by the Municipal Assembly. Since 2007, the amendment of the Regulation 2000/45 with that of 2007/30 (Amendment of the regulation no. 2000/45 on self-governance of Municipalities in Kosovo), the direct election system for the two municipal bodies was implemented: the Mayor and the Municipal Assembly. This was done through two different ballots; one for the mayor and one for the municipal assembly members in open lists for candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Compliance: a Case Study in Kosovo's Bjeshkët E Nemuna National Park a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Th
    Conservation and Compliance: A Case Study in Kosovo’s Bjeshkët e Nemuna National Park A thesis presented to the faculty of the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Meghan Nora Little May 2019 © 2019 Meghan Nora Little. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Conservation and Compliance: A Case Study in Kosovo’s Bjeshkët e Nemuna National Park by MEGHAN NORA LITTLE has been approved for the Program of Environmental Studies and the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs by Geoffrey Buckley Professor of Geography Mark Weinberg Dean, Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs 3 ABSTRACT LITTLE, MEGHAN NORA, M.S., May 2019, Environmental Studies Conservation and Compliance: A Case Study in Kosovo’s Bjeshkët e Nemuna National Park Director of Thesis: Geoffrey Buckley Global estimates indicate an average of thirteen million hectares of forest loss each year. In response to the ever-increasing threats to terrestrial biodiversity, protected areas such as national parks have become the main tool for nature conservation across the globe. However, a closer look at protected areas shows that compliance with regulations is a significant challenge, compromising the ability of conservation efforts to fulfill their goals and protect the ecosystems as intended. If protected areas are to remain a central conservation tool, more empirical research is needed to identify and understand drivers of noncompliance. This thesis takes an in-depth look at Bjeshkët e Nemuna National Park in Kosovo. Home to over 255 endemic species, the park was established in 2012 to protect the country’s most biodiverse region.
    [Show full text]